中文版简易决策冲突量表用于关节置换术老年病人的信效度研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Reliability and validity tests of the Chinese version of the Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale for elderly patients undergoing arthroplasty
  • 作者:吴娟 ; 陈文月
  • 英文作者:WU Juan;CHEN Wenyue;Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital,The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School;
  • 关键词:决策冲突 ; 简易决策冲突量表 ; 关节置换术 ; 信度 ; 效度 ; 老年人
  • 英文关键词:decision conflict;;Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale;;arthroplasty;;reliability;;validity;;elderly
  • 中文刊名:SXHZ
  • 机构:南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-21 18:39
  • 出版单位:护理研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.33;No.629
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SXHZ201909012
  • 页数:4
  • CN:09
  • ISSN:14-1272/R
  • 分类号:52-55
摘要
[目的]对简易决策冲突量表(Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale,DCS-LL)进行汉化,并在关节置换术老年病人中对中文版量表进行信效度检验。[方法]基于量表引进原则,对简易决策冲突量表进行跨文化调适,用中文版简易决策冲突量表对340例关节置换术老年病人进行调查,并进行信效度检验。[结果]中文版简易决策冲突量表的内容效度为0.85~1.00,量表的重测信度为0.865,总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.824;探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,方差累计贡献率为60.5%;验证性因子分析显示量表的模型拟合较好。[结论]中文版简易决策冲突量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评估我国关节置换术老年病人决策冲突情况。
        Objective:To translate the Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale(DCS-LL)into Chinese and test reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DCS-LL among elderly patients undergoing arthroplasty.Methods:Based on the principles of the introduction of scales,cross-cultural adjustment of DCS-LL was conducted.A total of 340 elderly patients undergoing arthroplasty were investigated with the Chinese version of DCS-LL,and the reliability and validity tests were performed.Results:The content validity of the Chinese version of DCS-LL was 0.85~1.00,the test-retest reliability was 0.865,and the Cronbach′sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.824.The exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors.The cumulative contribution rate of variance was 60.5%.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model of the scale was well fitted.Conclusions:The Chinese version of DCS-LL had good reliability and validity,which could be used to evaluate the decision-making conflicts of elderly patients undergoing arthroplasty in China.
引文
[1] 李玉安,谷长跃,王佳音.膝关节置换术及假体的研究进展[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33(6):1462-1464.
    [2] 于磊,刘利丹.共享决策——以患者为中心健康照护的顶峰[J].医学与哲学(B),2012,33(3B):81.
    [3] 于磊,石俊婷.医患共同决策诊疗模式的现状分析[J].医学与哲学(B),2013,34(1):50-53.
    [4] 袁一君,颜美琼.患者参与医疗护理决策现状及影响因素研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2013,28(5):93-96.
    [5] 张新庆.医患“共享决策”核心概念解析[J].医学与哲学(A),2017,38(10A):12-15.
    [6] 刘洪娟,吴明珑,廖宗峰,等.决策辅助在关节置换病人中的应用效果[J].骨科,2017,8(1):66-69.
    [7] LINDER S K,SWANK P R,VERNON S W,et al.Validity of a low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale[J].Patient Educ Couns,2011,85(3):521-524.
    [8] O′CONNOR A M.Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale[J].Med Decis Making,1995,15(1):25-30.
    [9] KOENIG H G,WESTLUND R E,GEORGE L K,et al.Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals[J].Psychosomatics,1993,34(1):61-69.
    [10] 郑晓华,李延知.状态-特质焦虑问卷[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(4):28-29.
    [11] JONES P S,LEE J W,PHILLIPS L R,et al.An adaptation of Brislin′s translation model for cross-cultural research[J].Nurs Res,2001,50(5):300-304.
    [12] 肖顺贞.护理研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:40-52.
    [13] 蒋艳,沈宁,邹树芳.护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174-176.
    [14] CHEN J Y,CLARK M J,CHANG Y Y,et al.Anxiety,decision conflict,and health in caregivers of children with ADHD:a survey[J].J Pediatr Nurs,2015,30(4):568-579.
    [15] LAM W W,CHAN M,OR A,et al.Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Clin Oncol,2013,31(23):2879-2885.
    [16] 李跃平,黄子杰.验证性因子分析在量表结构效度考核中作用[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(10):1198-1199.
    [17] 廖宗峰,方汉萍,刘洪娟,等.术前决策辅助对关节置换患者决策参与的影响[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(8):1-4.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700