宫腹腔镜联合手术治疗术后子宫切口憩室的效果观察
|
摘要
目的探究宫腹腔镜联合手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的效果。方法随机将50例患者分为实验组(25例,应用宫腹腔镜联合手术治疗)、对照组(25例,应用阴式手术治疗)。研究对比实验组和对照组患者的疗效、手术时间、术后阴道出血时间、住院时间。结果实验组患者总有效率92.00%,高于对照组68.00%,P<0.05;实验组患者手术时间长于对照组,但术后阴道出血时间、住院时间短于对照组,P<0.05。结论宫腹腔镜联合手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室效果较佳。
Objective To explore the effect of laparoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section. Methods 50 patients were randomly divided into experimental group(25 cases, laparoscopy combined with surgical treatment), control group(25 cases, vaginal operation). The curative effect, the time of operation, the time of postoperative vaginal bleeding and the time of hospitalization were compared between the experimental group and the control group. Results The total effective rate of the patients in the experimental group was 92%, higher than that of the control group 68%(P < 0.05). The operation time of the patients in the experimental group was longer than that of the control group, but the time of vaginal bleeding and the time of hospitalization were shorter than those of the control group, P < 0.05. Conclusion The curative effect of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section is better.
Objective To explore the effect of laparoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section. Methods 50 patients were randomly divided into experimental group(25 cases, laparoscopy combined with surgical treatment), control group(25 cases, vaginal operation). The curative effect, the time of operation, the time of postoperative vaginal bleeding and the time of hospitalization were compared between the experimental group and the control group. Results The total effective rate of the patients in the experimental group was 92%, higher than that of the control group 68%(P < 0.05). The operation time of the patients in the experimental group was longer than that of the control group, but the time of vaginal bleeding and the time of hospitalization were shorter than those of the control group, P < 0.05. Conclusion The curative effect of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section is better.
引文
[1]张先华,陈哲,费梦.宫腹腔镜联合手术与阴式手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的效果比较[J].中国综合临床,2015,31(1):63-66.
[2]赵倩,李哲,秦玲,等.3种手术方式治疗子宫切口憩室的疗效分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2016,32(4):286-288.
[3]张翠芹,贺丽霞.阴式手术与宫腹腔镜联合手术治疗子宫切口憩室的疗效及安全性比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(22):3902-3904.
[4]袁英,李渊渊.宫腹腔镜及宫腔镜诊治剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室21例临床分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2016,37(2):136-139.
[5]魏艳,罗剑儒,石钢,等.宫腔镜及宫、腹腔镜联合治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的疗效分析[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(3):337-341.
[6]贾艳红.阴式手术与宫腹腔镜联合手术修复剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室[J].包头医学院学报,2016,32(1):49-50.
[7]江娟,郑超群,钟肇梅.宫、腹腔镜联合手术和阴式手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的效果对比[J].中国医药科学,2017,7(14):79-82.
[8]Jung W S,Cho J H.Incidentally Found Killian-Jamieson Diverticulum Due to an Embedded Fish Bone[J].J Craniofa c Surg,2014,25(2):515-516.
[9]王伟.宫腹腔镜联合手术在剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室中的应用体会[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(27):123-124.
[10]杨俊娟,郭宝枝,刘爱珍,等.人工流产术后剖宫产子宫切口憩室260例临床分析[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(4):54-56.
[2]赵倩,李哲,秦玲,等.3种手术方式治疗子宫切口憩室的疗效分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2016,32(4):286-288.
[3]张翠芹,贺丽霞.阴式手术与宫腹腔镜联合手术治疗子宫切口憩室的疗效及安全性比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(22):3902-3904.
[4]袁英,李渊渊.宫腹腔镜及宫腔镜诊治剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室21例临床分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2016,37(2):136-139.
[5]魏艳,罗剑儒,石钢,等.宫腔镜及宫、腹腔镜联合治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的疗效分析[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(3):337-341.
[6]贾艳红.阴式手术与宫腹腔镜联合手术修复剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室[J].包头医学院学报,2016,32(1):49-50.
[7]江娟,郑超群,钟肇梅.宫、腹腔镜联合手术和阴式手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的效果对比[J].中国医药科学,2017,7(14):79-82.
[8]Jung W S,Cho J H.Incidentally Found Killian-Jamieson Diverticulum Due to an Embedded Fish Bone[J].J Craniofa c Surg,2014,25(2):515-516.
[9]王伟.宫腹腔镜联合手术在剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室中的应用体会[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(27):123-124.
[10]杨俊娟,郭宝枝,刘爱珍,等.人工流产术后剖宫产子宫切口憩室260例临床分析[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(4):54-56.