不同基质配比处理对奶白菜生长的影响
|
摘要
为筛选出利于奶白菜生长的基质配比,以沙子、草炭、腐殖酸配比成6种基质处理相互对照(T1～T6),采用随机排列的方法,研究了6种基质处理对奶白菜生长的影响。结果表明:T1、T2、T3处理株高、开展度、叶龄、鲜质量和干质量指标均高于其它处理,不同处理对奶白菜的株高、开展度、叶龄和干鲜质量有显著性影响;T1、T2处理的奶白菜最大叶片的柄长、叶长、叶宽指标高于其它处理,但不同处理的奶白菜最大叶片的柄长、叶长、叶宽的差异不明显;T1、T2、T3处理奶白菜的维生素C含量多,不同处理对奶白菜的维生素C含量呈极显著影响;T1、T2、T4处理奶白菜的粗蛋白和可溶性糖含量高,不同处理对奶白菜粗蛋白和可溶性糖含量呈极显著影响;综合评价分析说明,T1、T2处理综合评价指数高,奶白菜的生长效果较好。综上所述,推荐使用T1(20%沙子+60%草炭+20%腐殖酸)和T2(30%沙子+60%草炭+10%腐殖酸)2种基质。
In order to select the suitable ratio which is beneficial to the growth of cabbage,six substrates were treated with sand,peat and humic acid and compared with each other(T1-T6),and the effects of the growth of cabbage were studied by random arrangement.The results showed that the plant height,development degree,leaf age,fresh weight and dry weight indexes of T1,T2 and T3 treatments were higher than those of other treatments.Different treatments had significant effects on plant height,development degree,leaf age and dry weight and fresh weight of cabbage;the petiole length,leaf length and leaf width of the largest leaf of cabbage of T1 and T2 treatments were higher than those of other treatments,but there was no significant difference;the contents of vitamin C in cabbage of T1,T2 and T3 treatments were higher,and there was significantly affected by different treatments;the contents of crude protein and soluble sugar in cabbage of T1,T2 and T4 treatments were higher,and there was significantly affected by different treatments;comprehensive evaluation analysis showed that the comprehensive evaluation index of T1 and T2 treatments were higher,and the growth effect of cabbage was better.In conclusion,T1(20% sand+60% peat+20% humic acid)and T2(30%sand+60% peat+10% humic acid)were recommended.
In order to select the suitable ratio which is beneficial to the growth of cabbage,six substrates were treated with sand,peat and humic acid and compared with each other(T1-T6),and the effects of the growth of cabbage were studied by random arrangement.The results showed that the plant height,development degree,leaf age,fresh weight and dry weight indexes of T1,T2 and T3 treatments were higher than those of other treatments.Different treatments had significant effects on plant height,development degree,leaf age and dry weight and fresh weight of cabbage;the petiole length,leaf length and leaf width of the largest leaf of cabbage of T1 and T2 treatments were higher than those of other treatments,but there was no significant difference;the contents of vitamin C in cabbage of T1,T2 and T3 treatments were higher,and there was significantly affected by different treatments;the contents of crude protein and soluble sugar in cabbage of T1,T2 and T4 treatments were higher,and there was significantly affected by different treatments;comprehensive evaluation analysis showed that the comprehensive evaluation index of T1 and T2 treatments were higher,and the growth effect of cabbage was better.In conclusion,T1(20% sand+60% peat+20% humic acid)and T2(30%sand+60% peat+10% humic acid)were recommended.
引文
[1]刘婧.无土栽培技术的应用与发展[J].北方园艺,2012(16):204-206.
[2]袁四清.改进型有机生态无土栽培技术[J].长江蔬菜,2000,10(7):23-24.
[3]陆东娇,夏董霞.室内无土栽培介质简介[J].园林,1987(5):9.
[4]郑光华.无土栽培的生产成本与发展前景[J].农业工程学报,1988(1):65-70.
[5]冯海萍,曲继松,郭文忠,等.栽培模式对柠条复合基质栽培有机番茄生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2012(18):30-32.
[6]李淑仪,邓许文,陈发,等.有机无机肥配施比例对蔬菜产量和品质及土壤重金属含量的影响[J].生态环境,2007,16(4):1125-1134.
[7]吴继红.几种固形栽培基质物料的理化性状比较[J].吉林农业科学,2006,31(4):17-21.
[8]钟顺清.水肥耦合下草炭对小白菜生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(3):478-482.
[9]REINECKE F,GROTH T.Isolation and characterization of an Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain B3and other bacteria capable to degrade the synthetic chelating agent iminodisuccinate[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters,2000,188(1):41-46.
[10]SARATHCHANDRA S U,CHANI A.Effects of iron compounds,surfactants and other adjuvants[J].Soil Biology And Biochemistry,2001,33(7/8):953-964.
[11]张典文.特种蔬菜-奶白菜[J].农民致富之友,2007(9):16.
[12]张白鸽,高惠楠,陈琼贤,等.不同肥料对矮脚奶白菜产量及养分吸收效果的影响[J].2014(14):69-71.
[13]华孟,王坚.土壤物理学实验指导[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1990.
[14]中华人民共和国农业行业标准[Z].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[15]中华人民共和国林业行业标准[Z].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[16]鲁如坤,土壤化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
[17]刘庆超.三种重要盆栽花卉的有机代用基质研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
[18]郭世荣.无土栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:134-144.
[19]王清华,程鸿雁.栽培基质的选择与评价[J].山东林业科技,2006(1):72-74.
[20]邓煜,刘志峰.温室容器育苗基质及苗木生长规律的研究[J].林业科学,2000,36(5):33-39.
[21]朱锦茹,江波,袁位高.阔叶树容器育苗关键技术研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,28(5):728-732.
[22]黄志玲,彭玉华,朱积余,等.不同基质对台湾桤木容器苗生长的影响[J].西部林业科学,2014,43(2):91-96.
[23]孙洁,刘俊,郁培义,等.不同基质配方对降香黄檀幼苗生长生理的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(7):45-49.
[24]林霞,郑坚,刘洪见,等.不同基质对无柄小叶榕容器苗生长和叶片生理特性的影响[J].林业科学,2010,46(8):62-70.
[2]袁四清.改进型有机生态无土栽培技术[J].长江蔬菜,2000,10(7):23-24.
[3]陆东娇,夏董霞.室内无土栽培介质简介[J].园林,1987(5):9.
[4]郑光华.无土栽培的生产成本与发展前景[J].农业工程学报,1988(1):65-70.
[5]冯海萍,曲继松,郭文忠,等.栽培模式对柠条复合基质栽培有机番茄生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2012(18):30-32.
[6]李淑仪,邓许文,陈发,等.有机无机肥配施比例对蔬菜产量和品质及土壤重金属含量的影响[J].生态环境,2007,16(4):1125-1134.
[7]吴继红.几种固形栽培基质物料的理化性状比较[J].吉林农业科学,2006,31(4):17-21.
[8]钟顺清.水肥耦合下草炭对小白菜生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(3):478-482.
[9]REINECKE F,GROTH T.Isolation and characterization of an Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain B3and other bacteria capable to degrade the synthetic chelating agent iminodisuccinate[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters,2000,188(1):41-46.
[10]SARATHCHANDRA S U,CHANI A.Effects of iron compounds,surfactants and other adjuvants[J].Soil Biology And Biochemistry,2001,33(7/8):953-964.
[11]张典文.特种蔬菜-奶白菜[J].农民致富之友,2007(9):16.
[12]张白鸽,高惠楠,陈琼贤,等.不同肥料对矮脚奶白菜产量及养分吸收效果的影响[J].2014(14):69-71.
[13]华孟,王坚.土壤物理学实验指导[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1990.
[14]中华人民共和国农业行业标准[Z].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[15]中华人民共和国林业行业标准[Z].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[16]鲁如坤,土壤化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
[17]刘庆超.三种重要盆栽花卉的有机代用基质研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
[18]郭世荣.无土栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:134-144.
[19]王清华,程鸿雁.栽培基质的选择与评价[J].山东林业科技,2006(1):72-74.
[20]邓煜,刘志峰.温室容器育苗基质及苗木生长规律的研究[J].林业科学,2000,36(5):33-39.
[21]朱锦茹,江波,袁位高.阔叶树容器育苗关键技术研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,28(5):728-732.
[22]黄志玲,彭玉华,朱积余,等.不同基质对台湾桤木容器苗生长的影响[J].西部林业科学,2014,43(2):91-96.
[23]孙洁,刘俊,郁培义,等.不同基质配方对降香黄檀幼苗生长生理的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(7):45-49.
[24]林霞,郑坚,刘洪见,等.不同基质对无柄小叶榕容器苗生长和叶片生理特性的影响[J].林业科学,2010,46(8):62-70.