公共财政中的生态补偿模式比较研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Study on Patterns of Ecological Compensation: The Market Regulation Integrated into the Government Compensation
  • 作者:聂倩 ; 匡小平
  • 英文作者:NIE Qian;KUANG Xiao-ping;College of Finance & Taxation and Public Administration,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics;College of Economics and Management,East China Jiao Tong University;
  • 关键词:生态补偿 ; 政府主导模式 ; 市场补偿模式
  • 英文关键词:Ecological Compensation;;the Government-led Pattern;;the Market Compensation Pattern
  • 中文刊名:CLSJ
  • 英文刊名:The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
  • 机构:江西财经大学财税与公共管理学院;华东交通大学经济管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2014-03-25
  • 出版单位:财经理论与实践
  • 年:2014
  • 期:v.35;No.188
  • 基金:江西省社会科学规划项目(10YJ36);; 江西省研究生创新专项资金资助项目(YC2011-B025)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CLSJ201402018
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:43-1057/F
  • 分类号:105-110
摘要
生态补偿机制是解决生态环境问题、实现环境资源有偿利用的重要政策工具,选择合适的生态补偿模式对于我国的生态补偿实践具有重要意义。而我国生态补偿模式过多依赖政府主导,生态补偿的市场化交易模式发展缓慢。为提升生态补偿效率,我国的生态补偿应在优化政府补偿模式的基础上,通过法律制度的完善、管理体制的健全和市场交易机制的激活来促进市场补偿模式的发展,实现生态补偿的政府主导和市场调节相结合。
        The ecological compensation mechanism is an important policy tool to resolve ecoenvironmental problems and realize the paid use of environmental resources.Selecting proper compensation patterns is of great significance to popularize ecological compensation practice in the whole country.Based on the international ecological compensation practices and policies,this paper reviews the patterns of ecological compensation in our country and points out that China's ecological compensation practice relies on the government-led pattern excessively and market compensation patterns develop too slowly.To enhance the efficiency of ecological compensation,the market compensation patterns should be developed through the improvement of the legal system and management system,and integrated into the government-led model at last.
引文
[1]孔凡斌.生态补偿机制国际研究进展及中国政策选择[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2010,10(2):1-5.
    [2]Stefano Pagiola.Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(5):712-724.
    [3]Carlos Mu珘noz-Pi珘na,Alejandro Guevara,Juan Manuel Torres,Josefina Bra珘na.Paying for the hydrological services of mexico's forests:analysis,negotiations and results[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(5):725-736.
    [4]Kathy Baylis,Stephen Peplow,Gordon Rausser,Leo Simon.Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States:a comparison[J].Ecological Economic,2008,65(5):753-764.
    [5]Sven Wunder,Stefanie Engel,Stefano Pagiola.Taking stock:a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries[J].Ecological Economic,2008,65(5):834-852.
    [6]葛察忠,许开鹏.越南生态补偿新举措:森林环境服务收费[J].环境保护,2010,(16):70-71.
    [7]Nigel M.Asquith,Maria Teresa Vargas,Sven Wunder.Selling two environmental services:In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in los negros,bolivia[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(5):675-684.
    [8]Sven Wunder,Montserrat Albán.Decentralized payments for environmental services:the cases of pimampiro and PROFAFOR in ecuador[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(5):685-698.
    [9]Danièle Perrot-Ma珘ntre.The Vittel payments for ecosystem services:a‘perfect’PES case?[R].Project Paper,2006,(3).IIED,London.
    [10]田义文,张明波,刘亚男.跨省流域生态补偿:从合作困境走向责任共担[J].环境保护,2012,(15):37-40.
    [11]穆琳.我国主体功能区生态补偿机制创新研究[J].财经问题研究,2013,(7):103-108.
    [12]刘晶,葛颜祥.流域生态服务市场化补偿管理制度[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(8):1018-1024.
    [13]王威,张凤麟.排污权交易市场的构建[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(12):47-50.
    [14]李平,高原.发达国家生态效益补偿经验借鉴[J]环境保护,2011,(4):69-71.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700