济南泉域岩溶地下水防污性能评价方法研究
|
摘要
济南泉域内的四大泉群是济南市内最著名的旅游景点之一。随着经济的发展,济南市四大泉群泉水常规离子污染呈明显恶化趋势,生活饮用水常规指标含量较上世纪50年代有着明显的增加,摸清济南泉域的防污能力,有利于其地下水污染的分区治理和调控。地下水防污性能评价方法多种多样,但每种方法的评价对象不一,各有侧重。本文主要介绍了几种常用的地下水防污性能评价方法,并提出了适用于济南泉域岩溶地下水防污性能评价的方法。
The four largest group of springs in the Jinan spring field is one of the most famous tourist attractions in Jinan.With the development of economy,the conventional ion contamination of the four largest group of springs was developing worsen tendency,and the content of the routine index of drinking water has increased significantly compared with the 1950 s.Feel out the the stain-proof ability of the Jinan spring field will be very important for the protection of zhe spring filed.There are many evaluation methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment,but these methods has different evaluation objects and different emphases.This paper mainly introduces several common evaluation methods of the stain-proof ability,and puts forward some methods suitable for the evaluation of karst groundwater in the Jinan spring field.
The four largest group of springs in the Jinan spring field is one of the most famous tourist attractions in Jinan.With the development of economy,the conventional ion contamination of the four largest group of springs was developing worsen tendency,and the content of the routine index of drinking water has increased significantly compared with the 1950 s.Feel out the the stain-proof ability of the Jinan spring field will be very important for the protection of zhe spring filed.There are many evaluation methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment,but these methods has different evaluation objects and different emphases.This paper mainly introduces several common evaluation methods of the stain-proof ability,and puts forward some methods suitable for the evaluation of karst groundwater in the Jinan spring field.
引文
[1]白利平,王业耀.地下水脆弱性评价研究综述[J].工程勘察,2009(4):43-48.
[2]贺新春,邵东国,陈南祥,等.几种评价地下水环境脆弱性方法之比[J].长江科学院院报,2005,22(3):17-21.
[3]李大秋,邓春凯,刘新华,等.地下水脆弱性评价方法研究[J].环境保护科学,2007,33(5):64-67.
[4]钟佐燊.地下水防污性能评价方法探讨[J].地学前缘,2005(12):9-11.
[5]徐慧珍,高赞东.岩溶地区地下水防污性能评价-PI方法[J].新疆地质,2006,24(3):318-319 .
[6]Doerfliger N,Jeannin P Y,Zwahlen F.Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments:A new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method)[J].Environmental Geology,1999(2):165-176.
[7]章程,蒋勇军,Mich Le L,等.岩溶地下水脆弱性评价“二元法”及其在重庆金佛山的应用[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(4):334-340.
[8]邹胜章,张文慧,梁彬,等.西南岩溶区表层岩溶带水脆弱性评价指标体系的探讨[J].地学前缘,2005,12(特刊):152-158.
[9]章程,袁道先,李强,等.典型表层岩溶动力系统的环境敏感性研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2005(1):78-80.
[10]European Commission.Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate aquifers:final report COST action 620[R].Brussels:EC,2004.
[2]贺新春,邵东国,陈南祥,等.几种评价地下水环境脆弱性方法之比[J].长江科学院院报,2005,22(3):17-21.
[3]李大秋,邓春凯,刘新华,等.地下水脆弱性评价方法研究[J].环境保护科学,2007,33(5):64-67.
[4]钟佐燊.地下水防污性能评价方法探讨[J].地学前缘,2005(12):9-11.
[5]徐慧珍,高赞东.岩溶地区地下水防污性能评价-PI方法[J].新疆地质,2006,24(3):318-319 .
[6]Doerfliger N,Jeannin P Y,Zwahlen F.Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments:A new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method)[J].Environmental Geology,1999(2):165-176.
[7]章程,蒋勇军,Mich Le L,等.岩溶地下水脆弱性评价“二元法”及其在重庆金佛山的应用[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(4):334-340.
[8]邹胜章,张文慧,梁彬,等.西南岩溶区表层岩溶带水脆弱性评价指标体系的探讨[J].地学前缘,2005,12(特刊):152-158.
[9]章程,袁道先,李强,等.典型表层岩溶动力系统的环境敏感性研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2005(1):78-80.
[10]European Commission.Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate aquifers:final report COST action 620[R].Brussels:EC,2004.