Comparison of the impact of nesofilcon A hydrogel contact lens on the ocular surface and the comfort of presbyopic and non-presbyopic wearers
|
摘要
AIM: To assess and compare the impact of a daily disposable contact lens(CL) with high water content on the ocular surface and comfort of the presbyopic and nonpresbyopic population after one day of use. METHODS: Totally 20 presbyopes and 30 non-presbyopes non-contact wearers were fitted with nesofilcon A CLs. CL thickness was measured to assess material stability during daily wear, and ocular surface parameters were also assessed. Optical quality was analyzed for all cases. In addition, CL comfort was rated.RESULTS: No significant differences were found in CL thickness, tear film osmolarity, average tear break-up time, bulbar redness, central corneal thickness, corneal volume, root-mean-square of higher-order aberrations(RMS of HOAs) and vertical and horizontal coma, either as a function of the group or time of use. A significant decrease in tear meniscus height and first break-up of the tear film was found in the presbyopic group(P=0.038; P=0.007 respectively). A decrease in spherical aberration coefficient was found after CL insertion(P=0.031 monofocal CL; P=0.023 low addition multifocal CL; P=0.016 high addition multifocal CL). Multifocal CL were thicker than monofocal CL(P=0.045). Comparison between groups showed more discomfort in presbyopes than non-presbyopes(P=0.003).CONCLUSION: This study evidence that the behavior of the daily disposable CL with high water content seems to be stable during the day of use. Ocular parameters measured during wear show that CL behavior is the same for presbyopes and non-presbyopes, being more uncomfortable for presbyopes.
AIM: To assess and compare the impact of a daily disposable contact lens(CL) with high water content on the ocular surface and comfort of the presbyopic and nonpresbyopic population after one day of use. METHODS: Totally 20 presbyopes and 30 non-presbyopes non-contact wearers were fitted with nesofilcon A CLs. CL thickness was measured to assess material stability during daily wear, and ocular surface parameters were also assessed. Optical quality was analyzed for all cases. In addition, CL comfort was rated.RESULTS: No significant differences were found in CL thickness, tear film osmolarity, average tear break-up time, bulbar redness, central corneal thickness, corneal volume, root-mean-square of higher-order aberrations(RMS of HOAs) and vertical and horizontal coma, either as a function of the group or time of use. A significant decrease in tear meniscus height and first break-up of the tear film was found in the presbyopic group(P=0.038; P=0.007 respectively). A decrease in spherical aberration coefficient was found after CL insertion(P=0.031 monofocal CL; P=0.023 low addition multifocal CL; P=0.016 high addition multifocal CL). Multifocal CL were thicker than monofocal CL(P=0.045). Comparison between groups showed more discomfort in presbyopes than non-presbyopes(P=0.003).CONCLUSION: This study evidence that the behavior of the daily disposable CL with high water content seems to be stable during the day of use. Ocular parameters measured during wear show that CL behavior is the same for presbyopes and non-presbyopes, being more uncomfortable for presbyopes.
AIM: To assess and compare the impact of a daily disposable contact lens(CL) with high water content on the ocular surface and comfort of the presbyopic and nonpresbyopic population after one day of use. METHODS: Totally 20 presbyopes and 30 non-presbyopes non-contact wearers were fitted with nesofilcon A CLs. CL thickness was measured to assess material stability during daily wear, and ocular surface parameters were also assessed. Optical quality was analyzed for all cases. In addition, CL comfort was rated.RESULTS: No significant differences were found in CL thickness, tear film osmolarity, average tear break-up time, bulbar redness, central corneal thickness, corneal volume, root-mean-square of higher-order aberrations(RMS of HOAs) and vertical and horizontal coma, either as a function of the group or time of use. A significant decrease in tear meniscus height and first break-up of the tear film was found in the presbyopic group(P=0.038; P=0.007 respectively). A decrease in spherical aberration coefficient was found after CL insertion(P=0.031 monofocal CL; P=0.023 low addition multifocal CL; P=0.016 high addition multifocal CL). Multifocal CL were thicker than monofocal CL(P=0.045). Comparison between groups showed more discomfort in presbyopes than non-presbyopes(P=0.003).CONCLUSION: This study evidence that the behavior of the daily disposable CL with high water content seems to be stable during the day of use. Ocular parameters measured during wear show that CL behavior is the same for presbyopes and non-presbyopes, being more uncomfortable for presbyopes.
引文
1 Rueff EM,Bailey MD.Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.Cont Lens Anterior Eye2017;40(5):323-328.
2 Morgan PB,Efron N.Contact lens correction of presbyopia.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32(4):191-192.
3 Morgan PB,Efron N,Woods CA,International Contact Lens Prescribing Survey Consortium.An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia.Clin Exp Optom 2011;94(1):87-92.
4 Morgan PB,Woods CA,Tranoudis,et al.International contact lens prescribing in 2016.Contact Lens Spectrum 2017;32:30-35
5 Pérez-Prados R,Pi?ero DP,Pérez-CambrodíRJ,Madrid-Costa D.Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses:a review.Clin Exp Optom2017;100(2):107-127.
6 Nichols KK,Redfern RL,Jacob JT,Nelson JD,Fonn D,Forstot SL,Huang JF,Holden BA,Nichols JJ.The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort:report of the definition and classification subcommittee.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54(11):TFOS14.
7 Rico-Del-Viejo L,Lorente-Velázquez A,Hernández-Verdejo JL,GarcíaMata R,Benítez-Del-Castillo JM,Madrid-Costa D.The effect of ageing on the ocular surface parameters.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(1):5-12.
8 Ruiz-Alcocer J,Monsálvez-Romín D,García-Lázaro S,Albarrán-Diego C,Hernández-Verdejo JL,Madrid-Costa D.Impact of contact lens material and design on the ocular surface.Clin Exp Optom 2018;101(2):188-192.
9 Potvin R,Makari S,Rapuano CJ.Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease:a review of the literature.Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:2039-2047.
10 Nichols JJ,Sinnott LT.Tear film,contact lens,and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(4):1319-1328.
11 Miller WL,Doughty MJ,Narayanan S,Leach NE,Tran A,Gaume AL,Bergmanson JP.A comparison of tear volume(by tear meniscus height and phenol red thread test)and tear fluid osmolality measures in non-lens wearers and in contact lens wearers.Eye Contact Lens 2004;30(3):132-137.
12 Nagahara Y,Koh S,Maeda N,Nishida K,Watanabe H.Prominent decrease of tear meniscus height with contact lens wear and efficacy of eye drop instillation.Eye Contact Lens 2015;41(5):318-322.
13 Craig JP,Willcox MD,Argüeso P,Maissa C,Stahl U,Tomlinson A,Wang JH,Yokoi N,Stapleton F;members of TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort.The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort:report of the contact lens interactions with the tear film subcommittee.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2013;54(11):TFOS123-TFOS156.
14 Palakuru JR,Wang JH,Aquavella JV.Effect of blinking on tear dynamics.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(7):3032-3037.
15 Palakuru JR,Wang JH,Aquavella JV.Effect of blinking on tear volume after instillation of midviscosity artificial tears.Am J Ophthalmol2008;146(6):920-924.
16 Lowther GE,Hill RM.Sensitivity threshold of the lower lid margin in the course of adaptation to contact lenses.Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1968;45(9):587-594.
17 Stern ME,Beuerman RW,Fox RI,Gao J,Mircheff AK,Pflugfelder SC.The pathology of dry eye:the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands.Cornea 1998;17(6):584-589.
18 Deláguila-Carrasco AJ,Ferrer-Blasco T,García-Lázaro S,EsteveTaboada JJ,Montés-MicóR.Assessment of corneal thickness and tear meniscus during contact-lens wear.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38(3):185-193.
19 Sapkota K,Franco S,Lira M.Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens:Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort?Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(3):252-257.
20 Mousavi M,Jesus DA,Garaszczuk IK,Szczesna-Iskander DH,Iskander DR.The utility of measuring tear film break-up time for prescribing contact lenses.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(1):105-109.
21 Schafer J,Steffen R,Reindel W,Chinn J.Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials,using refractive index shifts after wear.Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:1973-1979.
22 Chao C,Richdale K,Jalbert I,Doung K,Gokhale M.Non-invasive objective and contemporary methods for measuring ocular surface inflammation in soft contact lens wearers-a review.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017;40(5):273-282.
23 Madrid-Costa D,Ruiz-Alcocer J,García-Lázaro S,Ferrer-Blasco T,Montés-MicóR.Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses:effect of pupil size.Cont Lens Anterior Eye2015;38(5):317-321.
24 Wagner S,Conrad F,Bakaraju RC,Fedtke C,Ehrmann K,Holden BA.Power profiles of single vision and multifocal soft contact lenses.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38(1):2-14.
25 Papadatou E,Deláguila-Carrasco AJ,Esteve-Taboada JJ,MadridCosta D,Cervi?o-Expósito A.Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.Int JOphthalmol 2017;10(1):103-108.
26 Plainis S,Atchison DA,Charman WN.Power profiles of multifocal contact lenses and their interpretation.Optom Vis Sci 2013;90(10):1066-1077.
27 Liu HX,Thibos L,Begley CG,Bradley A.Measurement of the time course of optical quality and visual deterioration during tear break-up.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(6):3318-3326.
28 Montés-MicóR,Cervi?o A,Ferrer-Blasco T,García-Lázaro S,Madrid-Costa D.The tear film and the optical quality of the eye.Ocul Surf 2010;8(4):185-192.
29 Denoyer A,Rabut G,Baudouin C.Tear film aberration dynamics and vision-related quality of life in patients with dry eye disease.Ophthalmology 2012;119(9):1811-1818.
30 Richdale K,Sinnott LT,Skadahl E,Nichols JJ.Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation.Cornea 2007;26(2):168-174.
2 Morgan PB,Efron N.Contact lens correction of presbyopia.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32(4):191-192.
3 Morgan PB,Efron N,Woods CA,International Contact Lens Prescribing Survey Consortium.An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia.Clin Exp Optom 2011;94(1):87-92.
4 Morgan PB,Woods CA,Tranoudis,et al.International contact lens prescribing in 2016.Contact Lens Spectrum 2017;32:30-35
5 Pérez-Prados R,Pi?ero DP,Pérez-CambrodíRJ,Madrid-Costa D.Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses:a review.Clin Exp Optom2017;100(2):107-127.
6 Nichols KK,Redfern RL,Jacob JT,Nelson JD,Fonn D,Forstot SL,Huang JF,Holden BA,Nichols JJ.The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort:report of the definition and classification subcommittee.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54(11):TFOS14.
7 Rico-Del-Viejo L,Lorente-Velázquez A,Hernández-Verdejo JL,GarcíaMata R,Benítez-Del-Castillo JM,Madrid-Costa D.The effect of ageing on the ocular surface parameters.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(1):5-12.
8 Ruiz-Alcocer J,Monsálvez-Romín D,García-Lázaro S,Albarrán-Diego C,Hernández-Verdejo JL,Madrid-Costa D.Impact of contact lens material and design on the ocular surface.Clin Exp Optom 2018;101(2):188-192.
9 Potvin R,Makari S,Rapuano CJ.Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease:a review of the literature.Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:2039-2047.
10 Nichols JJ,Sinnott LT.Tear film,contact lens,and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(4):1319-1328.
11 Miller WL,Doughty MJ,Narayanan S,Leach NE,Tran A,Gaume AL,Bergmanson JP.A comparison of tear volume(by tear meniscus height and phenol red thread test)and tear fluid osmolality measures in non-lens wearers and in contact lens wearers.Eye Contact Lens 2004;30(3):132-137.
12 Nagahara Y,Koh S,Maeda N,Nishida K,Watanabe H.Prominent decrease of tear meniscus height with contact lens wear and efficacy of eye drop instillation.Eye Contact Lens 2015;41(5):318-322.
13 Craig JP,Willcox MD,Argüeso P,Maissa C,Stahl U,Tomlinson A,Wang JH,Yokoi N,Stapleton F;members of TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort.The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort:report of the contact lens interactions with the tear film subcommittee.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2013;54(11):TFOS123-TFOS156.
14 Palakuru JR,Wang JH,Aquavella JV.Effect of blinking on tear dynamics.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(7):3032-3037.
15 Palakuru JR,Wang JH,Aquavella JV.Effect of blinking on tear volume after instillation of midviscosity artificial tears.Am J Ophthalmol2008;146(6):920-924.
16 Lowther GE,Hill RM.Sensitivity threshold of the lower lid margin in the course of adaptation to contact lenses.Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1968;45(9):587-594.
17 Stern ME,Beuerman RW,Fox RI,Gao J,Mircheff AK,Pflugfelder SC.The pathology of dry eye:the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands.Cornea 1998;17(6):584-589.
18 Deláguila-Carrasco AJ,Ferrer-Blasco T,García-Lázaro S,EsteveTaboada JJ,Montés-MicóR.Assessment of corneal thickness and tear meniscus during contact-lens wear.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38(3):185-193.
19 Sapkota K,Franco S,Lira M.Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens:Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort?Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(3):252-257.
20 Mousavi M,Jesus DA,Garaszczuk IK,Szczesna-Iskander DH,Iskander DR.The utility of measuring tear film break-up time for prescribing contact lenses.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(1):105-109.
21 Schafer J,Steffen R,Reindel W,Chinn J.Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials,using refractive index shifts after wear.Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:1973-1979.
22 Chao C,Richdale K,Jalbert I,Doung K,Gokhale M.Non-invasive objective and contemporary methods for measuring ocular surface inflammation in soft contact lens wearers-a review.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017;40(5):273-282.
23 Madrid-Costa D,Ruiz-Alcocer J,García-Lázaro S,Ferrer-Blasco T,Montés-MicóR.Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses:effect of pupil size.Cont Lens Anterior Eye2015;38(5):317-321.
24 Wagner S,Conrad F,Bakaraju RC,Fedtke C,Ehrmann K,Holden BA.Power profiles of single vision and multifocal soft contact lenses.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38(1):2-14.
25 Papadatou E,Deláguila-Carrasco AJ,Esteve-Taboada JJ,MadridCosta D,Cervi?o-Expósito A.Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.Int JOphthalmol 2017;10(1):103-108.
26 Plainis S,Atchison DA,Charman WN.Power profiles of multifocal contact lenses and their interpretation.Optom Vis Sci 2013;90(10):1066-1077.
27 Liu HX,Thibos L,Begley CG,Bradley A.Measurement of the time course of optical quality and visual deterioration during tear break-up.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(6):3318-3326.
28 Montés-MicóR,Cervi?o A,Ferrer-Blasco T,García-Lázaro S,Madrid-Costa D.The tear film and the optical quality of the eye.Ocul Surf 2010;8(4):185-192.
29 Denoyer A,Rabut G,Baudouin C.Tear film aberration dynamics and vision-related quality of life in patients with dry eye disease.Ophthalmology 2012;119(9):1811-1818.
30 Richdale K,Sinnott LT,Skadahl E,Nichols JJ.Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation.Cornea 2007;26(2):168-174.