PROSPERO系统评价注册平台针灸资源现状分析
|
摘要
通过检索PROSPERO系统评价注册平台在2014年3月31日之前收录的针灸领域系统评价注册信息,对计划书涉及的疾病分布、干预措施、研究团队及完成状态等信息进行分析,全面了解该平台针灸领域系统评价注册情况。结果最终纳入分析的计划书共52篇,所关注的健康问题以疼痛性疾病为主,干预措施以单纯针刺及针灸结合的形式为主。由中国团队参与的注册计划出现时间较晚,独立承担的研究数量较少,研究单位集中,并未体现出在该领域的科研优势。认为国内研究者对系统评价注册的意识有待加强,在今后的研究中可合理利用PROSPERO平台的资源。
By searching the registry information of systematic review regarding acupuncture included before March 31,2014 in PROSPERO systematic review registry platform,information in the project plan such as categories of diseases,interventions,research team and the completion status was analyzed to make a comprehensive understanding on registry status of acupuncture systematic review in this platform.As a result,a total of 52 project plans was finally included.The health problem concerned was mainly pain-related diseases,and the interventions were mostly simple acupuncture or combination of acupuncture and moxibustion.The registered plan participated with Chinese team appeared comparatively late,which was featured with fewer independent projects and concentrated research organization,so its scientific research advantage in acupuncture did not present.In conclusion,it is believed that the consciousness on systematic review registry in domestic researchers needs to be improved,and researchers might take good advantages of the PROSPERO platform in the future.
By searching the registry information of systematic review regarding acupuncture included before March 31,2014 in PROSPERO systematic review registry platform,information in the project plan such as categories of diseases,interventions,research team and the completion status was analyzed to make a comprehensive understanding on registry status of acupuncture systematic review in this platform.As a result,a total of 52 project plans was finally included.The health problem concerned was mainly pain-related diseases,and the interventions were mostly simple acupuncture or combination of acupuncture and moxibustion.The registered plan participated with Chinese team appeared comparatively late,which was featured with fewer independent projects and concentrated research organization,so its scientific research advantage in acupuncture did not present.In conclusion,it is believed that the consciousness on systematic review registry in domestic researchers needs to be improved,and researchers might take good advantages of the PROSPERO platform in the future.
引文
[1]刘鸣.系统评价、Meta-分析设计与实施方法[M]﹒北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:3-9.
[2]杨智荣,詹思延.PROSPERO:为非Cochrane系统评价全新打造的注册平台[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(6):422-426.
[3]Booth A,Clarke M,Ghersi D,et al.An international registry of systematic-review protocols[J].Lancet,2011,377(9760):108-109.
[4]刘迈兰,兰蕾,吴曦,等.Cochrane图书馆针灸资源述评[J].中国针灸,2011,31(7):670-672.
[5]Straus S,Moher D.Registering systematic reviews[J].CMAJ,2010,182(1):13-14.
[6]Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J].PLoS Med,2009,6(7):e1000097.
[7]Booth A,Clarke M,Dooley G,et al.The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO:an international prospective register of systematic reviews[J].Syst Rev,2012,1:2.
[8]Booth A,Clarke M,Ghersi D,et al.Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews:an international consultation[J].PLoS One,2011,6(11):e27319.
[2]杨智荣,詹思延.PROSPERO:为非Cochrane系统评价全新打造的注册平台[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(6):422-426.
[3]Booth A,Clarke M,Ghersi D,et al.An international registry of systematic-review protocols[J].Lancet,2011,377(9760):108-109.
[4]刘迈兰,兰蕾,吴曦,等.Cochrane图书馆针灸资源述评[J].中国针灸,2011,31(7):670-672.
[5]Straus S,Moher D.Registering systematic reviews[J].CMAJ,2010,182(1):13-14.
[6]Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J].PLoS Med,2009,6(7):e1000097.
[7]Booth A,Clarke M,Dooley G,et al.The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO:an international prospective register of systematic reviews[J].Syst Rev,2012,1:2.
[8]Booth A,Clarke M,Ghersi D,et al.Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews:an international consultation[J].PLoS One,2011,6(11):e27319.