摘要
作者利用城市经济学理论模型分析长效性保障房供给规模对城市空间和社会福利的影响。长效性保障房的供给会提高低收入居民的效用,缩小社会的贫富差距,抑制商品住房价格,但是也会扩大城市边界并减少公共服务。过度的长效性保障房供给将导致财政困难,减少社会福利。因此,应把握好长效性保障房供给规模和商品住房供给规模的均衡问题,只有供给适当规模的长效性保障房,才能实现社会福利的最大化。
Using urban economic model,the author analyzes the effects of long-term affordable housing supply scale on urban spatial structure and social welfare. Long-term affordable housing supply will improve low-income households' utilities,mitigate inequality,and inhibit commodity housing price,but it will expand city size and reduce public service.If the supply scale of long-term affordable housing is excessive,it will lead to financial difficulties and reduce social welfare. Therefore,the balance between long-term affordable housing supply scale and commercial housing supply scale should be hold well. Only when the supply scale of long-term affordable housing is appropriate,the social welfare will be maximized.
引文
[英]巴顿(1984):《城市经济学---理论和政策》,北京:商务印书馆,第89页。
顾澄龙、周应恒、严斌剑(2016):《住房公积金制度、房价与住房福利》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第109~124页。
李梦玄、周义(2012):《保障房建设的社会福利效应测度和实证研究》,《中南财经政法大学学报》第5期,第29~34页。
李培(2007):《最优城市规模研究述评》,《经济评论》第1期,第131~135页。
马树才、宋丽敏(2003):《我国城市规模发展水平分析与比较研究》,《统计研究》第7期,第30~34页。
潘爱民、韩正龙(2012):《城镇公共住宅保障制度的发展阶段问题及对策研究》,《经济研究导刊》第28期,第159~160页。
王小广(2012):《如何合理确定保障房建设目标》,《经济研究参考》第44期,第9~12页。
余劲、程甜(2015):《城镇保障性住房福利效用评价指标体系构建与测度》,《统计与决策》第14期,第56~59页。
张金水(2003):《应用国际经济学》,北京:清华大学出版社,第7页。
郑思齐、廖俊平、任荣荣、曹洋(2011):《农民工住房政策与经济增长》,《经济研究》第2期,第73~86页。
Arnott,R.J.and R.M.Braid(1997),“A Filtering Model with Steady-State Housing”,Regional Science and Urban Economics,27(4-5),pp.515-546.
Braid,R.M.(1986),“The Comparative Statics of a Filtering Model of Housing with Two Income Groups”,Regional Science and Urban Economics,16,pp.437-448.
Brueckner,J.K.(1981),“A Dynamic Model of Housing Production”,Journal of Urban Economics,10(1),pp.1-14.
Burns,J.H.(2005),“Happiness and Utility:Jeremy Bentham's Equation”,Utilitas,17(1),pp.46-61.
Chudacoff,H.P.and J.E.Smith(2009),The Evolution of American Urban Society,New York:Pearson Higher Education.
Glaeser,E.L.(2003),“Does Rent Control Reduce Segregation?”,Swedish Economic Policy Review,10,pp.179-202.
Hardman,A.M.and Y.M.Ioannides(1999),“Residential Mobility and the Housing Market in a Two-Sector Neoclassical Growth Model”,Scandinavian Journal of Economics,101(2),pp.315-335.
Huang,Y.(2003),“A Room of One's Own:Housing Consumption and Residential Crowding in Transitional Urban China”,Environment and Planning A,35(4),pp.591-614.
Ohls,J.C.(1975),“Public Policy Toward Low Income Housing and Filtering in Housing Markets”,Journal of Urban Economics,2(2),pp.144-171.
Sasaki,K.(1987),“A Comparative Static Analysis of Urban Structure in the Setting of Endogenous Income”,Journal of Urban Economics,22(2),pp.53-72.
Sasaki,K.(1990),“An Alternative Version of a Vintage Model of An Urban Housing Market”,Journal of Urban Economics,28(2),pp.125-139.
Smith,R.E.and K.Ferryman(2006),“Saying Good-Bye:Relocating Senior Citizens in the HOPEVI Panel Study”,https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/50476/311279-Saying-GoodBye.PDF,Washington DC,US:The Urban Institute.
Susin,S.(2002),“Rent Vouchers and the Price of Low-Income Housing”,Journal of Public Economics,83(1),pp.109-152.
Sweeny,J.L.(1974),“A Commodity Hierarchy Model of the Rental Housing Market”,Journal of Urban Economics,1(3),pp.288-323.
(1)共有产权房根据土地划拨方式可分为共有产权经济适用房和共有产权限价房。共有产权经济适用房由原经济适用房转化而来,其土地是无偿划拨的;而共有产权限价房的土地是有偿出让的。
(1)它们都属于产权式保障性住房,对政府而言均有土地出让金收入,只解决购买人的住房问题(一次性保障)。限价房以出让方式获得建设用地,棚户区改造房和旧城改造房可以盘活部分土地获得土地出让收入。通过调研发现,它们的开发资金回笼较快,政府和开发商较倾向于这些项目的开发。
(1)建筑品质与建筑成本正相关,收入越高的家庭愿意购买品质越高的住房,因此假设建筑品质属于消费品需求。