凉山州艾滋病传播风险的健康社会决定因素评价指标体系构建
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Establishment of an AIDS risk assessment index system based on social determinants of health,Liangshan
  • 作者:韩佳禹 ; 杨淑娟 ; 裴容 ; 吉克春农 ; 高博 ; 余刚 ; 肖琳 ; 王菊 ; 刘丹萍 ; 黄玉玲 ; 王子昕 ; 王科
  • 英文作者:HAN Jia-yu;YANG Shu-juan;PEI Rong;JI Ke-chunnong;GAO Bo;YU Gang;XIAO Lin;WANG Ju;LIU Dan-ping;HUANG Yu-ling;WANG Zi-xin;WANG Ke;Health and Social behaviour Department,West China School of Public Health,Sichuan University;
  • 关键词:艾滋病 ; 指标体系 ; 德尔菲法 ; 层次分析法
  • 英文关键词:AIDS;;Index system;;Delphi method;;AHP
  • 中文刊名:XDYF
  • 英文刊名:Modern Preventive Medicine
  • 机构:四川大学华西公共卫生学院(华西第四医院);凉山州疾病预防控制中心;郫都区疾病预防控制中心;香港中文大学赛马会公共卫生及基层医疗学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-10
  • 出版单位:现代预防医学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.46
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(81703279);; 凉山州艾滋病防治项目(H170614;H161236);; 四川省重大传染病防治项目(2018卫计委-03)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XDYF201907021
  • 页数:5
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:51-1365/R
  • 分类号:78-82
摘要
目的构建凉山州艾滋病传播风险的健康社会决定因素评价指标体系,为凉山州艾滋病防控工作提供科学依据。方法本研究首先采用文献法及专题小组讨论法初步确定指标体系,再应用德尔菲法和层次分析法相结合的方法构建指标体系并确定各级指标权重。结果两轮咨询的专家积极系数分别为100%、90.9%;一级指标的专家权威系数均值为0.93±0.04;两轮咨询专家意见协调系数分别为0.438和0.520,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);经过两轮专家咨询建立了凉山州艾滋病传播风险的健康社会决定因素评价指标体系,该指标体系包括8个一级指标,29个二级指标,89个三级指标;应用层次分析法确定了各级指标权重,各判断矩阵的一致性检验结果CR均<0.1,具有较好的逻辑合理性。结论本研究专家咨询质量好,所建立的指标体系结构合理、内容全面。
        Objective To establish an AIDS risk assessment index system based on social determinants of health in Liangshan prefecture and to provide evidence for the prevention and control of AIDS.Methods With methods of literature review and focus group discussion,a preliminary index system was established.Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)were applied to screen the indexes and determine the weight of each index.Results The active coefficients were 100% and 90.9% for the two rounds of expert consultation,respectively.The mean of authority coefficient of the primary index was 0.93±0.04.The concordance coefficients were 0.438 and 0.520,respectively,with statistically significant(P<0.05).The final indicators comprised 8 primary indexes,29 secondary indexes and 89 tertiary indexes.The weight of each index was calculated by AHP,and the consistency of each judgment matrix CR was lower than 0.1,suggesting that the index system exhibited good logical rationality.Conclusion The expert consultation has achieved reliable results.The established index system has reasonable structure and comprehensive contents,which can provide a quantitative basis for the empirical study.
引文
[1] 龚煜汉,王启兴,余刚,等.四川省凉山州1995-2012年HIV/AIDS病人死亡情况分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2014,20(11):849-852,856.
    [2] 杨淑娟,张建新,陈心月,等.艾滋病流行与防治的社会结构模型研究[J].中国科技成果,2013(1):12-14.
    [3] Health WC.Final report of the commission on social determinants of health[M].Geneva:World Health Organization,2008.
    [4] Braveman P,Egerter S,Williams DR.The social determinants of health:coming of age[J].Annual Review of Public Health,2011,32:381-398.
    [5] Zeglin RJ,Stein JP.Social determinants of health predict state incidence of HIV and AIDS:a short report[J].AIDS Care,2015,27(2):255-259.
    [6] Sutton MY,Gray SC,Elmore K,et al.Social determinants of HIV disparities in the Southern United States and in counties with Historically Black Colleges and Universities(HBCUs),2013-2014[J].PLOS One,2017,12(1):e170714.
    [7] Sharpe TT,Voute C,Rose MA,et al.Social determinants of HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases among black women:implications for health Equity[J].Journal of Women′s Health,2012,21(3):249-254.
    [8] 丁晋飞,谈立峰,郝东平,等.应用Delphi法构建区域性大型活动卫生保障住宿场所卫生监督量化评价指标体系[J].现代预防医学,2013,40(2):365-367,369.
    [9] 任晓晖,李宁秀,毛立坡.四川省社区卫生服务机构建设评价指标筛选[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2008,39(3):471-473.
    [10] 杨淑娟,罗敏,张素华,等.凉山彝族相关文化习俗与艾滋病流行的关系及干预对策[J].中国艾滋病性病,2017,23(3):271-274.
    [11] 周如南,周大鸣.情境中性的社会网络与艾滋病风险——凉山地区通过性途径传播艾滋病的风险研究[J].开放时代,2012(2):144-158.
    [12] 杨义,吴春霖,刘鹏,等.凉山州某县彝族村民偶遇性行为现状及其地理网络分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2012,28(3):184-186.
    [13] 杨淑娟,翟雯雯,吉克春农,等.凉山州彝族与其他民族社区人群艾滋病感染的影响因素分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2018,24(3):257-260.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700