基于改进沙丘活动指数的晋北地区土地沙化风险动态分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis on the dynamics of desertification risk based on improved dune mobility index in north Shanxi Province
  • 作者:王云霞 ; 张红
  • 英文作者:WANG Yunxia;ZHANG Hong;Shanxi Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning;College of Environmental & Resource Sciences,Shanxi University;
  • 关键词:土地沙化 ; 沙丘活动指数 ; 沙化指数 ; 时空格局 ; 晋北地区
  • 英文关键词:desertification risk;;dune mobility index;;desertification index;;temporal-spatial pattern;;north Shanxi Province
  • 中文刊名:GHZH
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
  • 机构:山西省林业调查规划院;山西大学环境与资源学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 出版单位:干旱区资源与环境
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.33;No.249
  • 基金:山西省科技重大专项(20121101011);; 山西省自然科学基金(201701D221216)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GHZH201905016
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:15-1112/N
  • 分类号:97-102
摘要
土地沙化是全球主要环境问题之一,晋北地区由于地处北方干旱半干旱区,土地沙化是该区经济发展的制约因素之一。文中在传统的沙丘活动指数的基础上,结合地表环境特征对其进行了改进,探讨了基于改进的沙丘活动指数的2001-2012年来晋北地区土地沙化风险的时空分布和变化特征。结果如下:1)改进的沙丘活动指数将气候因子、植被因子和土壤因子纳入考虑。基于改进的沙丘活动指数分析,2001-2012年晋北主要以未沙化风险为主,轻度沙化风险居中,中度沙化风险和重度沙化风险较少。中度以上沙化风险主要集中在西南部的保德县和东北部的南郊区、阳高县和天镇县部分区域。2) 2001-2012年间,晋北沙化土地风险呈现一个持续逆转的态势;呈"明显逆转"和"逆转"的沙化土地风险主要集中在晋西北和左云县、怀仁县、大同县、阳高县等地,呈"发展"和"严重发展"的沙化土地风险则主要集中分布在大同的南郊区和天镇县。研究区重度沙化风险的区域面积在逐渐降低;轻度、中度沙化风险的土地面积在减少,未沙化风险的区域面积在逐渐增加; 3)文中探讨了基于改进的活动沙丘指数的晋北地区土地沙化风险,研究发现该指数在一定程度上能反映整个晋北地区的土地沙化风险特征。但是,该指数也存在一定的不足,人类活动(如国家退耕还林政策)对土地沙化风险会产生一定的影响,未来需要进一步验证指数的合理性。
        Desertification is a major environmental problem concerned by all world. Northern Shanxi is located in the east of loess plateau and the temperate semi-arid steppe zone,where the desertification caused by wind erosion is seriously. This research improved dune mobility index introduced by Lancaster,and put forward desertification risk index combined dune mobility index,NDVI and soil erodible K together. The spatial distribution,area and dynamic change of desertification risk of Northern Shanxi were explored based on the desertification risk index. The results indicated: 1) Based on the improved dune mobility index,northern Shanxi province was mainly no desertification risk. The moderate and severe desertification risk could be found in Baode County,Nanjiao District,Yanggao County and Tianzhen Counth. 2) Combining the climate factors and land surface environmental factors together,the desertification risk of research area from 2001 to 2012 exhibited a sustained reversal trend. The "obvious reversal"and "reversal "were mainly concentrated in the northwest of Shanxi and Zuoyun,Huairen,Datong and Yanggao County. The "development"and "serious development"were mainly concentrated in the Datong Nanjiao District and Tianzhen County. 3) The improved dune mobility index revealed the relationship between climates,land surface environment and desertification risk. However,human activities such as afforestation also impacted the desertification risk. The rationality of improved dune mobility index should be validated in future.
引文
[1]王涛.我国沙漠化研究的若干问题-3.沙漠化研究和防治的重点区域[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(1):1-9.
    [2]张莉秋,张红,李皎,等.晋北沙漠化地区1980-2014年的气候变化[J],中国沙漠,2016,36(4):1116-1125.
    [3]杨晓晖,张克斌,慈龙骏.中国荒漠化评价的现状,问题及其解决途径[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(1):22-28.
    [4]Berry L,Ford R B. Recommendations for a system to monitor critical indicators in areas prone to desertification[R]. Massachusetts,USA:Clark University,1977.
    [5]Reining P. Handbook on Desertification Indicators[M]. Washington USA:American Association for the Advancement of Science,1978.
    [6]Lancaster N. Development of linear dunes in the southwestern Kalahari,Southern Africa[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,1988,14(3):233-244.
    [7]Wang X,Dong Z,Liu L,et al. Sand sea activity and interactions with climatic parameters in the Taklimakan Sand Sea,China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2004,57(2):225-238.
    [8]Lancaster N,Helm P. A test of a climatic index of dune mobility using measurements from the southwestern United States[J]. Earth Surface Processes&Landforms,2015,25(2):197-207.
    [9]Thomas D S G,Leason H C. Dunefield activity response to climate variability in the southwest Kalahari[J]. Geomorphology,2005,64(1):117
    [10]王涛,吴薇,赵哈林,等.科尔沁地区现代沙漠化过程的驱动因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(5):519-528.
    [11]王君厚,孙司衡.荒漠化类型划分及数量化评价体系[J].干旱环境监测,1996,10(3):129-138.
    [12]彭国栋.沙漠化与气候变化互馈机制探究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2012.
    [13]Wang X M,Yang Y,Dong Z B,et al. Responses of dune activity and desertification in China to global warming in the twenty-first century.[J]. Global&Planetary Change,2009,67(3):167-185.
    [14]Thornthwaite C W. An approach toward a rational classification of climate[J]. Geographical Review,1948,38(1):55-94.
    [15]王训明,李吉均,董光荣,等.近50a来中国北方沙区风沙气候演变与沙漠化响应[J].科学通报,2007,52(24):2882-2888.
    [16]李金亚.科尔沁沙地草原沙化时空变化特征遥感监测及驱动力分析[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2014.
    [17]任国玉,郭军,徐铭志,等.近50年中国地面气候变化基本特征[J].气象学报,2005,63(6):942-956.
    [18]施雅风,沈永平,李栋梁,等.中国西北气候由暖干向暖湿转型的特征和趋势探讨[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(2):152-164.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700