摘要
进一步深化中国大学课程考核评价方法改革是保证教学质量、提高人才培养的重要环节。以闭卷考试为主的传统考核评价模式已不能满足新时代人才培养的要求。寻求并建立新的课程考核评价模式,充分调动每一位学生的学习积极性,提高学生的学习效率和满意度势在必行。课程采用"基于学生自主选择的多元化课程考核评价模式",根据学生的个人意愿灵活选择讲课、出试卷和期末闭卷考试等模式进行课程的考核评价,使考核评价的主体向多元化转变,考核评价的重点向过程评价转变,考核评价的方法向定性加定量转变,引导学生主动学习,培养学生的独立思考能力和创新思维。研究可为多元化课程考核评价在本科教学过程中的实践提供参考。
It is very important to further optimize the evaluation method of course assessment inuniversities for ensuring the teaching quality and improving the education quality.The traditional evaluation mode,which is mainly based on the closed-book exam,no longer meets the requirements of talent cultivation for the new era.Teachers need to find and establish a new curriculum evaluation model,to fully motivate students' enthusiasm for learning and to improve students' learning efficiency and satisfaction.In this paper,we adopt the new evaluation model of"diver curriculum evaluation based on students' independent choice".Students can independently choose one of three evaluation methods including giving a lecture,writing an examination paper and attending the final closed-book exam based on student's personal wishes.Implementation of this model can help to make main body of evaluation be diver,evaluation focus be procedural,and evaluation method be quantitative and qualitative.In addition,this evaluation method can guide students to learn actively and cultivate students' ability of independent and creative thinking.This paper provides reference for the practice of diverse curriculum evaluation in undergraduate teaching.
引文
[1]朱昌平,谢祖峰,高远,等.高频电路“闭卷”“半开卷”“开卷”相结合的考试方法研究[J].实验技术与管理,2011,28(5):20-22.
[2]闫福.本科生闭卷考试问题与优化对策[J].黑龙江教育,2015(1):48-49.
[3]吴坚,李文萍,商广义.研究型大学理科教学中的开卷考试及实践[J].中国大学教学,2012(6):60-61.
[4]许桂清.高校大班教学背景下通识教育课程小组研讨模式探讨[J].中国现代教育装备,2016(13):87-89.
[5]汪琨,裘娟萍,钟卫鸿,等.基于人生规划的小班研讨---以“微生物学”课程为例[J].微生物学通报,2016,43(4):749-755.
[6]钟启泉.基于核心素养的课程发展:挑战与课题[J].全球教育展望,2016,45(1):3-25.
[7]何玉海.课程改革中隐性课程的作用不容忽视[J].教育理论与实践,2004,24(2):34-36.