不同边界层参数化方案对江苏地区一次平流雾过程的模拟影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Influence of Different Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes on the Simulation of an Advection Fog Process in Jiangsu
  • 作者:崔驰潇 ; 包云轩 ; 袁成松 ; 周林义 ; 焦圣明 ; 宗晨
  • 英文作者:CUI Chixiao;BAO Yunxuan;YUAN Chengson;ZHOU Linyi;JIAO Shenming;ZONG Chen;Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast Meteorological Disaster Warning and Assessment, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology;Key Laboratory of Transportation Meteorology,China Meteorological Administration;Jiangsu Meteorological Institute;Jiangsu Meteorological Information Center;
  • 关键词:江苏地区 ; 平流雾 ; 边界层参数化方案 ; WRF模式 ; 模拟效果评估
  • 英文关键词:Jiangsu area;;Advection fog;;Scheme of boundary layer parameterization;;WRF model;;Simulation evaluation
  • 中文刊名:DQXK
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
  • 机构:南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心;中国气象局交通气象重点开放实验室;江苏省气象科学研究所;江苏省气象信息中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-15
  • 出版单位:大气科学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.42
  • 基金:国家公益性行业(气象)科研专项GYHY201306043;; 江苏省科技支撑计划项目BE2015732;; 江苏省气象局北极阁基金项目BJG201404~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DQXK201806012
  • 页数:19
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:11-1768/O4
  • 分类号:173-191
摘要
边界层参数化方案的选取在平流雾的预报准确度上起着决定性的作用。本文利用WRF模式对2013年3月18~19日发生在江苏地区的一次平流雾过程进行数值模拟试验,对耦合不同闭合方式边界层参数化方案的试验结果与实测气象数据进行对比分析,评估了他们对此次平流雾的模拟效果,探讨了边界层高度对此次平流雾的生成和发展的影响。研究结果表明:(1)耦合不同边界层方案的WRF模式对地面气象要素的模拟结果均呈现气温偏低、湿度和风速偏大的特征。(2)QNSE方案对气温的模拟能力最强;ACM2方案对相对湿度的模拟性能最好;YSU方案对风速的模拟效果最佳。不同边界层方案的模拟结果在垂直方向上的差别主要表现在低空相对湿度上:QNSE方案预报的湿度更大。(3)综合TS(Threat Score)和BS(Bias Score)两个评分指标来看,ACM2方案对雾区分布的模拟效果最好。三个边界层方案对此次平流雾的模拟结果在江苏沿海站点的预报评分较高,在距海较远站点的预报评分表现较差。YSU方案对东南沿海地区的雾区预报评分较高;QNSE方案对长江沿江区域的雾区预报评分较高;ACM2方案对沿海地区、尤其对沿海北部地区的有较好的预报效果。(4)QNSE方案对此次平流雾的生成时间、出现地点预报比较准确。(5)平流雾的生成与发展阶段模拟雾区覆盖范围与边界层高度关系十分紧密,适当强度的湍流混合作用有助于平流雾在地面的生成与发展;但是过强的湍流混合作用会导致大雾过早的消散。
        The simulation and prediction accuracy of advection fog depends on the selection of boundary layer parameterization scheme. Coupled with different schemes of boundary layer parameterization, the Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF) model was used in this paper to simulate an advection fog process occurred in Jiangsu during the period from March 18 th to 19 th in 2013 and the simulation results are compared with observed meteorological data to analyze and evaluate the simulation of the advection fog. The results of the experiments are as follows.(1) The surface air temperature is underestimated but the relative humidity and wind speed are overestimated.(2) Among the schemes of Quasi-Scale Elimination(QNSE), Asymmetrical Convective Model version 2(ACM2) and Youngstown State University Scheme(YSU), the QNSE scheme has the best ability to simulate air temperature, the ACM2 scheme has the best performance for the simulation of relative humidity and the YSU scheme performs best in the the simulation of wind speed. The main difference between the three boundary layer parameterization schemes for the simulation of meteorological elements in the vertical direction is the difference in the simulated relative humidity at low levels and the QNSE scheme was the most humid.(3) According to the Scoring Standards TS(Threat Score) and BS(Bias Score), the simulation effect of the ACM2 scheme is the best one among the three schemes. The simulation results of the three boundary layer parameterization schemes for this advection fog process are better at the coastal sites of Jiangsu, and the prediction scores at the sites far away from the sea are worse. The YSU scheme has higher score on the fog area forecast in the southeastern coastal area, the QNSE scheme has higher score on the fog area forecast in the Yangtze River Valley and the ACM2 scheme has good simulation effect on the fog area forecast in the coastal areas, especially in the northern coastal areas.(4) The QNSE scheme is more accurate in the prediction of the formation time and occurrence location of the advection fog.(5) The simulated fog coverage in the formation and development stages of the advection fog is closely related to the height of the boundary layer, and the turbulent mixing with an appropriate intensity would contribute to the formation and development of advection fog on the ground, but too strong turbulence mixing would lead to premature fog dissipation.
引文
白永清,祁海霞,刘琳,等.2016.武汉大气能见度与PM2.5浓度及相对湿度关系的非线性分析及能见度预报[J].气象学报,74(2):189-199.Bai Yongqing,Qi Haixia,Liu Lin,et al.2016.Study on the nonlinear relationship among the visibility,PM2.5 concentration and relative humidity in Wuhan and the visibility prediction[J].Acta Meteor.Sinica(in Chinese),74(2):189-199,doi:10.11676/qxxb2016.013.
    Banks R F,Tiana-Alsina J,Baldasano J M,et al.2016.Sensitivity of boundary-layer variables to PBL schemes in the WRF model based on surface meteorological observations,lidar,and radiosondes during the HygrA-CD campaign[J].Atmos.Res.,176-177:185-201,doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.024.
    Bossioli E,Tombrou M,Dandou A,et al.2009.The role of planetary boundary-layer parameterizations in the air quality of an urban area with complex topography[J].Bound.-Layer Meteor.,131(1):53-72,doi:10.1007/s10546-009-9349-7.
    蔡淼,欧建军,周毓荃,等.2014.L波段探空判别云区方法的研究[J].大气科学,38(2):213-222.Cai Miao,Ou Jianjun,Zhou Yuquan,et al.2014.Discriminating cloud area by using L-band sounding data[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),38(2):213-222,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.12193.
    Chaouch N,Temimi M,Weston M,et al.2017.Sensitivity of the meteorological model WRF-ARW to planetary boundary layer schemes during fog conditions in a coastal arid region[J].Atmos.Res.,187:106-127,doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.12.009.
    陈杨瑞雪,罗亚丽.2016.不同边界层参数化方案和陆面过程参数化方案对一次梅雨锋暴雨显式对流模拟的影响分析[J].热带气象学报,32(5):656-667.Chen Yangruixue,Luo Yali.2016.Analysis of the influence of different parameterization schemes representing the planetary boundary layer and land surface processes on convection-permitting simulations of a heavy rainfall event along Mei-Yu front[J].Journal of Tropical Meteorology(in Chinese),32(5):656-667,doi:10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2016.05.008.
    Coniglio M C,Correia J Jr,Marsh P T,et al.2013.Verification of convection-allowing WRF model forecasts of the planetary boundary layer using sounding observations[J].Wea.Forecasting,28(3):842-862,doi:10.1175/WAF-D-12-00103.1.
    董昊,徐海明,罗亚丽.2012.云凝结核浓度对WRF模式模拟飑线降水的影响:不同云微物理参数化方案的对比研究[J].大气科学,36(1):145-169.Dong Hao,Xu Haiming,Luo Yali.2012.Effects of cloud condensation nuclei concentration on precipitation in convection permitting simulations of a squall line using WRF model:Sensitivity to cloud microphysical schemes[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),36(1):145-169.
    Draxl C,Hahmann A N,Pe?a A,et al.2014.Evaluating winds and vertical wind shear from Weather Research and Forecasting model forecasts using seven planetary boundary layer schemes[J].Wind Energy,17(1):39-55,doi:10.1002/we.1555.
    杜川利,唐晓,李星敏,等.2014.城市边界层高度变化特征与颗粒物浓度影响分析[J].高原气象,33(5):1383-1392.Du Chuanli,Tang Xiao,Li Xingmin,et al.2014.Calculations of planetary boundary layer height and its relationship with particle size concentration in Xi’an city[J].Plateau Meteorology(in Chinese),33(5):1383-1392,doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00077.
    高笃鸣,李跃清,蒋兴文,等.2016.WRF模式多种边界层参数化方案对四川盆地不同量级降水影响的数值试验[J].大气科学,40(2):371-389.Gao Duming,Li Yueqing,Jiang Xingwen,et al.2016.Influence of planetary boundary layer parameterization schemes on the prediction of rainfall with different magnitudes in the Sichuan Basin using the WRF model[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),40(2):371-389,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1503.14323.
    Gultepe I,Tardif R,Michaelides S C,et al.2007.Fog research:A review of past achievements and future perspectives[J].Pure Appl.Geophys.,164(6-7):1121-1159,doi:10.1007/s00024-007-0211-x.
    Gunwani P,Mohan M.2017.Sensitivity of WRF model estimates to various PBL parameterizations in different climatic zones over India[J].Atmos.Res.,194:43-65,doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.026.
    何晓凤,周荣卫,孙逸涵.2014.3个全球模式对近地层风场预报能力的对比检验[J].高原气象,33(5):1315-1322.He Xiaofeng,Zhou Rongwei,Sun Yihan.2014.Verification on surface wind speed of three global circulation models in China[J].Plateau Meteorology(in Chinese),33(5):1315-1322,doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00093.
    Hong,Song-You,Yign Noh,Jimy Dudhia,2006:A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes.Mon.Wea.Rev.,134,2318-2341.doi:10.1175/MWR3199.1
    Hu X M,Nielsen-Gammon J W,Zhang F Q.2010.Evaluation of three planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model[J].Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology,49(9):1831-1844,doi:10.1175/2010JAMC2432.1.
    胡轶佳,钟中,闵锦忠.2008.两种积云对流参数化方案对1998年区域气候季节变化模拟的影响研究[J].大气科学,32(1):90-100.Hu Yijia,Zhong Zhong,Min Jinzhong.2008.Impacts of cumulus parameterization scheme on the seasonal variation simulation of regional climate in 1998[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),32(1):90-100,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2008.01.08.
    Huang H J,Liu H N,Huang J,et al.2015.Atmospheric boundary layer structure and turbulence during sea fog on the southern China coast[J].Mon.Wea.Rev.,143(5):1907-1923,doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00207.1.
    黄政,袁成松,包云轩,等.2016.基于不同参数化方案的高速公路大雾过程的数值模拟试验[J].气象,42(8):944-953.Huang Zheng,Yuan Chengsong,Bao Yunxuan,et al.2016.Numerical simulations of heavy fog processes on expressways based on different parameterization schemes[J].Meteorological Monthly(in Chinese),42(8):944-953,doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.08.004.
    Joffre S M,Kangas M,Heikinheimo M,et al.2001.Variability of the stable and unstable atmospheric boundary-layer height and its scales over a boreal forest[J].Bound.-Layer Meteor.,99(3):429-450,doi:10.1023/A:1018956525605.
    Kang Y F,Belu?i?D,Smith-Miles K.2015.Classes of structures in the stable atmospheric boundary layer[J].Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soci.,141(691):2057-2069,doi:10.1002/qj.2501.
    Kioutsioukis I,de Meij A,Jakobs H,et al.2016.High resolution WRFensemble forecasting for irrigation:Multi-variable evaluation[J].Atmospheric Research,167:156-174,doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.07.015.
    Kunkel B A.2010.Parameterization of droplet terminal velocity and extinction coefficient in fog models[J].J.Climate Appl.Meteor.,23(1):34-41,doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0034:PODTVA>2.0.CO;2.
    Lim K S S,Hong S Y.2010.Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei(CCN)for weather and climate models[J].Mon.Wea.Rev.,138(58):1587-1612,doi:10.1175/2009MWR2968.1.
    刘永和,严中伟,冯锦明,等.2013.基于TIGGE资料的沂沭河流域6小时降水集合预报能力分析[J].大气科学,37(3):539-551.Liu Yonghe,Yan Zhongwei,Feng Jinming,et al.2013.Predictability of6-hour precipitation in the Yishu River basin based on TIGGE data[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),37(3):539-551,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.11078.
    Liu S Y,Liang X Z.2010.Observed diurnal cycle climatology of planetary boundary layer height.[J].Journal of Climate,23(21):5790-5809.doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3552.1.
    陆雪,高山红,饶莉娟,等.2014.春季黄海海雾WRF参数化方案敏感性研究[J].应用气象学报,25(3):312-320.Lu Xue,Gao Shanhong,Rao Lijuan,et al.2014.Sensitivity study of WRF parameterization schemes for the spring sea fog in the Yellow Sea[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science(in Chinese),25(3):312-320,doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2014.03.008.
    Ma L M,Tan Z M.2009.Improving the behavior of the cumulus parameterization for tropical cyclone prediction:Convection trigger[J].Atmos.Res.,92(2):190-211,doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.022.
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.1995.Surface weather observations and reports.Federal Meteorological Handbook No.1,94 pp.Department of Commerce,NOAA,Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research,8455 Colesville Road,Suite 1500,Silver Spring,MD,20910(Available from).
    Nielsen-Gammon J W,Powell C L,Mahoney M J,et al.2008.Multisensor estimation of mixing heights over a coastal city[J].J.Appl.Meteor.Climatol.,47(1):27-43,doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1503.1.
    Nieuwstadt F T M.2005.The atmospheric boundary layer[M]//Environmental Stratified Flows.Armenio V,Sarkar S,Eds.Vienna:Springer,89-134,doi:10.1007/3-211-38078-7_4.
    Payra S,Mohan M.2014.Multirule based diagnostic approach for the fog predictions using WRF modelling tool[J].Adv.Meteor.,2014:456065,doi:10.1155/2014/456065.
    Pérez C,Jiménez P,Jorba O,et al.2006.Influence of the PBL scheme on high-resolution photochemical simulations in an urban coastal area over the Western Mediterranean[J].Atmos.Environ.,40(27):5274-5297,doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.039.
    Pleim J E.2007a.A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer.Part I:Model description and testing[J].J.Appl.Meteor.Climatol.,46(9):1383-1395,doi:10.1175/JAM2539.1.
    Pleim J E.2007b.A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer.Part II:Application and evaluation in a mesoscale meteorological model[J].J.Appl.Meteor.Climatol.,46(9):1396-1409,doi:10.1175/JAM2534.1.
    祁妙,朱彬,潘晨,等.2015.长江三角洲冬季一次低能见度过程的地区差异和气象条件[J].中国环境科学,35(10):2899-2907.Qi Miao,Zhu Bin,Pan Chen,et al.2015.Regional differences and meteorological conditions of a low visibility procedure over the Yangtze River delta region in winter[J].China Environmental Science(in Chinese),35(10):2899-2907,doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2015.10.003.
    Román-Cascón C,Yagüe C,Sastre M,et al.2012.Observations and WRFsimulations of fog events at the Spanish northern Plateau[J].Adv.Sci.Res.,8(1):11-18,doi:10.5194/asr-8-11-2012.
    石春娥,吴照宪,邓学良,等.2013.MM5与MM5-PAFOG模式区域雾预报效果评估比较[J].高原气象,32(5):1349-1359.Shi Chun’e,Wu Zhaoxian,Deng Xueliang,et at.2013.Validation and comparison of regional fog forecast by MM5 and MM5-PAFOG models[J].Plateau Meteorology(in Chinese),32(5):1349-1359.Doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2012,00126.
    石春娥,李耀孙,杨军,等.2015.MM5和WRF对中国东部地区冬季边界层模拟效果比较[J].高原气象,34(2):389-400.Shi Chun’e,Li Yaosun,Yang Jun,et al.2015.Comparison of simulations on winter sounding profiles in PBL in East China between WRF and MM5[J].Plateau Meteorology(in Chinese),34(2):389-400,doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00206.
    Steeneveld G J,Ronda R J,Holtslag A A M.2015.The challenge of forecasting the onset and development of radiation fog using mesoscale atmospheric models[J].Bound.-Layer Meteor.,154(2):265-289,doi:10.1007/s10546-014-9973-8.
    Sukoriansky S.2008.Implementation of Quasi-Normal Scale Elimination model of stably stratified turbulence in WRF[R].Report on WRF-DTCVisit of Semion Sukoriansky-June.
    Sukoriansky S,Galperin B,Perov V.2005.‘Application of a new spectral theory of stably stratified turbulence to the atmospheric boundary layer over sea ice’[J].Bound.-Layer Meteor.,117(2):231-257,doi:10.1007/s10546-004-6848-4.
    Sukoriansky S,Galperin B.2008.A quasi-normal scale elimination(QNSE)theory of turbulent flows with stable stratification and its application in weather forecast systems[C]//6th IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Heat Transfer,Thermal Engineering and Environment(THE’08).Rhodes,Greece,376-380.
    涂静,张苏平,程相坤,等.2012.黄东海大气边界层高度时空变化特征[J].中国海洋大学学报,42(4):7-18.Tu Jing,Zhang Suping,Cheng Xiangkun,et al.2012.Temporal and spatial variation of atmospheric boundary layer height(ABLH)over the Yellow-East China Sea[J].Periodical of Ocean University of China(in Chinese),42(4):7-18,doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5174.2012.04.002.
    万小雁,包云轩,严明良,等.2010.不同陆面方案对沪宁高速公路团雾的模拟[J].气象科学,30(4):487-494.Wan Xiaoyan,Bao Yunxuan,Yan Mingliang,et al.2010.Simulation of the dumpling fog on the Nanjing-Shanghai Expressway based on different land-surface schemes[J].Scientia Meteorologica Sinica(in Chinese),30(4):487-494,doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0827.2010.04.009.
    王博妮,袁成松,陈鹏,等.2015.2013年初春一次平流雾过程对江苏交通的影响分析[J].气象与环境科学,38(1):46-53.Wang Boni,Yuan Chengsong,Chen Peng,et al.2015.Influence analysis of an advection fog process on Jiangsu transport in the early spring of the year 2013[J].Meteorological and Environmental Sciences(in Chinese),38(1):46-53,doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7148.2015.01.007.
    王佳,郭根华,严明良,等.2014.WRF模式对沪宁高速公路浓雾的模拟与检验研究[J].热带气象学报,30(2):377-381.Wang Jia,Guo Genhua,Yan Mingliang,et al.2014.WRF model simulation and verification of fog in Shanghai-Nanjing Expressway[J].Journal of Tropical Meteorology(in Chinese),30(2):377-381,doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2014.02.019.
    王益柏,梅娜,范磊,等.2014.WRF模式对2013年1月华北一次大雾的数值对比试验[J].气象,40(12):1522-1529.Wang Yibai,Mei Na,Fan Lei,et al.2014.Comparative experiments of WRF simulation on a fog event of January 2013 in North China[J].Meteorological Monthly(in Chinese),40(12):1522-1529,doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2014.12.011.
    王子谦,段安民,吴国雄.2014.边界层参数化方案及海气耦合对WRF模拟东亚夏季风的影响[J].中国科学:地球科学,44(3):548-562.Wang Ziqian,Duan Anmin,Wu Guoxiong.2014.Impacts of boundary layer parameterization schemes and air-sea coupling on WRF simulation of the East Asian summer monsoon[J].Science China Earth Sciences,57(7):1480-1493,doi:10.1007/s11430-013-4801-4.
    Wong W K,Lai E S T,Ghidaoui M S,et al.2010.Numerical simulation of fog using non-hydrostatic NWP model with third-order turbulence closure[J].Journal of Hydro-environment Research,4(2):131-141,doi:10.1016/j.jher.2010.04.001.
    吴晓京,朱江,王曦,等.2017.风云三号微波观测资料的海雾同化模拟[J].大气科学,41(3):421-436.Wu Xiaojing,Zhu Jiang,Wang Xi,et al.2017.Sea fog simulation with assimilation of FY-3A microwave data[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),41(3):421-436,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1610.16105.
    徐慧燕,朱业,刘瑞,等.2013.长江下游地区不同边界层参数化方案的试验研究[J].大气科学,37(1):149-159.Xu Huiyan,Zhu Ye,Liu Rui,et al.2013.Simulation experiments with different planetary boundary layer schemes in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),37(1):149-159,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.12021.
    严明良,缪启龙,袁成松,等.2011,沪宁高速公路一次大雾过程的数值模拟及诊断分析[J].高原气象,30(2):428-436.Yan Mingliang,Miao Qilong,Yuan Chengsong,et al.2011.Numerical simulation and diagnostic analysis of a heavy fog process in Shanghai-Nanjing Expressway[J].Plateau Meteorology(in Chinese),30(2):428-436.
    杨悦,高山红.2016.黄海海雾WRF数值模拟中垂直分辨率的敏感性研究[J].气象学报,74(6):974-988.Yang Yue,Gao Shanhong.2016.Sensitivity study of vertical resolution in WRF numerical simulation for sea fog over the Yellow Sea[J].Acta Meteor.Sinica(in Chinese),74(6):974-988,doi:10.11676/qxxb2016.062.
    姚日升,涂小萍,张小伟,等.2017.宁波一次罕见持续重度污染事件的成因分析[J].气象学报,75(2):342-355.Yao Risheng,Tu Xiaoping,Zhang Xiaowei,et al.2017.Analysis on a rare persistent heavy pollution event in Ningbo[J].Acta Meteor.Sinica(in Chinese),75(2):342-355,doi:10.11676/qxxb2017.018.
    曾波,谌芸,李泽椿.2015.我国中东部地区夏季中尺度对流系统形成前物理量诊断分析[J].地球物理学报,58(1):32-46.Zeng Bo,Chen Yun,Li Zechun.2015.Diagnostic analysis of physical quantities for the precursor environment of mesoscale convective system during summer in central-eastern China[J].Chinese J.Geophys.(in Chinese),58(1):32-46,doi:10.6038/cjg20150104.
    曾新民,吴志皇,熊仕焱,等.2011.WRF模式短期高温天气模拟对陆面方案的敏感性[J].中国科学:地球科学,41(9):1375-1384.Zeng Xinmin,Wu Zhihuang,Xiong Shiyan,et al.2011.Sensitivity of simulated short-range high-temperature weather to land surface schemes by WRF[J].Science China Earth Sciences,54(4):581-590,doi:10.1007/s11430-011-4181-6.
    张舒婷,牛生杰,赵丽娟.2013.一次南海海雾微物理结构个例分析[J].大气科学,37(3):552-562.Zhang Shuting,Niu Shengjie,Zhao Lijuan.2013.The microphysical structure of fog droplets in a sea fog event in the South China Sea[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),37(3):552-562,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.11204.
    张颖,刘志红,吕晓彤,等.2016.四川盆地一次污染过程的WRF模式参数化方案最优配置[J].环境科学学报,36(8):2819-2826.Zhang Ying,Liu Zhihong,LüXiaotong,et al.2016.Optimal configuration of parameterized schemes in WRF model during a pollution episode in Sichuan basin[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(in Chinese),36(8):2819-2826,doi:10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2016.0009.
    朱丰,徐国强,李莉,等.2014.同化青藏高原地区GPSPW数据对长江中下游地区降水预报的影响评估[J].大气科学,38(1):171-189.Zhu Feng,Xu Guoqiang,Li Li,et al.2014.An assessment of the impact on precipitation prediction in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River made by assimilating GPSPW data in the Tibetan Plateau[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),38(1):171-189,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.13117.
    朱格利,林万涛,曹艳华.2014.用WRF模式中不同云微物理参数化方案对华南一次暴雨过程的数值模拟和性能分析[J].大气科学,38(3):513-523.Zhu Geli,Lin Wantao,CaoYanhua.2014.Numerical simulation of a rainstorm event over South China by using various cloud microphysics parameterization schemes in WRF model and its performance analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences(in Chinese),38(3):513-523,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.13202.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700