多孔芳香骨架吸附剂-固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Simultaneous determination of four azo dyes in paprika powder by high performance liquid chromatography using a porous aromatic framework as the solid-phase extraction sorbent
  • 作者:闻威 ; 张文芬 ; 张岩皓 ; 赵无垛 ; 张书胜
  • 英文作者:WEN Wei;ZHANG Wenfen;ZHANG Yanhao;ZHAO Wuduo;ZHANG Shusheng;College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University;State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry,Hong Kong Baptist University;
  • 关键词:多孔芳香骨架 ; 固相萃取 ; 高效液相色谱 ; 偶氮染料 ; 辣椒粉
  • 英文关键词:porous aromatic framework;;solid phase extraction(SPE);;high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC);;azo dyes;;paprika powder
  • 中文刊名:SPZZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Chromatography
  • 机构:郑州大学化学与分子工程学院;香港浸会大学化学系环境与生物分析国家重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-08
  • 出版单位:色谱
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.37
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(21475119,21775140)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SPZZ201905005
  • 页数:8
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:21-1185/O6
  • 分类号:41-48
摘要
建立了固相萃取-高效液相色谱同时测定辣椒粉中对位红、酸性橙Ⅱ、苏丹红Ⅰ和苏丹红Ⅱ4种偶氮染料的方法。以多孔芳香骨架-6(PAF-6)材料作为固相萃取吸附剂,考察并获得了影响自制固相萃取柱的萃取效率和吸附容量等主要因素。在优化条件下,4种目标分析物的检出限(LOD)为1.5~7.0μg/L(信噪比S/N=3),定量限(LOQ)为5.0~22.1μg/L(S/N=10),加标回收率为76.5%~89.8%,相对标准偏差(RSD)均不大于5.3%(n=6)。此外,基于量子化学计算,考察了PAF-6与目标分析物之间的相互作用机制,结果表明,目标分析物可以稳定地吸附在PAF-6分子上。该方法准确可靠,具有良好的回收率和较高的灵敏度,可用于辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料的检测。
        In this study, a solid-phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography(SPE-HPLC) method was developed for the determination of Para Red, Orange Ⅱ sodium salt, Sudan Ⅰ, and Sudan Ⅱ in paprika powder based on a self-made porous aromatic framework-6(PAF-6) solid-phase extraction cartridge. The major factors affecting the extraction efficiency and adsorption capacity of this solid-phase extraction were evaluated. Under optimized conditions, the limits of detection(LODs) and limits of quantification(LOQs) of the four target analytes ranged from 1.5 to 7.0 μg/L and 5.0 to 22.1 μg/L, respectively. The recoveries were in the range of 76.5-89.8%, and the relative standard deviation(RSD) was not more than 5.3%(n=6). Moreover, quantum chemistry calculations were performed to investigate the molecular interaction mechanism between the PAF-6 and target analytes. The results indicated that the target molecules could be stably adsorbed onto the PAF-6. The method is accurate, reliable, and sensitive, and can be successfully applied to detect the four azo dyes in paprika powder.
引文
[1]López-López A,Pic J S,Debellefontaine H.Chemosphere,2007,66(11):2120
    [2]Combes R D,Haveland-Smith R B.Mutat Res,1982,98(2):101
    [3]Yun H,Liu X,Wang J,et al.Chinese Journal of Chromatography,2013,31(9):845云环,刘鑫,王静,等.色谱,2013,31(9):845
    [4]Xing Y,Gao H,Liu Y D,et al.Food Research and Development,2017,38(13):140邢燕,高慧,刘玉栋,等.食品研究与开发,2017,38(13):140
    [5]Li C Y,Chen L G,You X X.Environ Sci Pollut Res,2014,21(21):12382
    [6]Murty M,Chary N S,Prabhakar S,et al.Food Chem,2009,115(4):1556
    [7]Ou Y M,Pei L,Lai K Q,et al.Food Anal Methods,2017,10(3):565
    [8]Awadelkarim K D,Mariani-Costantini R,Elwali N E.Sci Total Environ,2012,423:214
    [9]Fonovich T M.Drug Chem Toxicol,2013,36(3):343
    [10]Gómez M,Arancibia V,Aliaga M,et al.Food Chem,2016,212:807
    [11]?vila M,Zougagh M,Escarpa A,et al.J Supercrit Fluids,2011,55(3):977
    [12]Fu Y,Zhu Y,Wu Y L.Journal of Instrumental Analysis,2017,36(4):496付岩,朱勇,吴银良.分析测试学报,2017,36(4):496
    [13]Erta?E,?zer H,Alasalvar C.Food Chem,2007,105(2):756
    [14]Chen B,Chao X L,Gao W W,et al.Chemistry&Bioengineering,2017,34(10):44陈碧,晁小练,高雯雯,等.化学与生物工程,2017,34(10):44
    [15]Liu J,Gong Z B.Chinese Journal of Chromatography,2012,30(6):624刘珺,弓振斌.色谱,2012,30(6):624
    [16]Chen D M,Li X Q,Tao Y F,et al.J Chromatogr B,2013,939:45
    [17]Pitkowska M,Jedziniak P,Olejnik M,et al.J Vet Res,2017,61(3):299
    [18]Otero P,Saha S K,Hussein A,et al.Food Anal Methods,2017,10(4):876
    [19]Mejia E,Ding Y S,Mora M F,et al.Food Chem,2007,102(4):1027
    [20]Wang Y,Yang H,Wang B,et al.J Sci Food Agric,2011,91(10):1836
    [21]Rejczak T,Tuzimski T.Food Anal Methods,2017,10(11):3572
    [22]Chen L Y,Hu J G,Zhang W,et al.Food Anal Methods,2015,8(8):1903
    [23]Qi P,Zeng T,Wen Z J,et al.Food Chem,2011,125(4):1462
    [24]Hu M Z,Wu L J,Song Y,et al.Food Anal Methods,2016,9(7):2124
    [25]Yang F,Bian Z Y,Li Z H,et al.J AOAC Int,2016,99(5):1370
    [26]Chen N,Liu K F,Zhang Y P.Journal of Instrumental Analysis,2014,33(8):959陈娜,刘坤峰,张裕平.分析测试学报,2014,33(8):959
    [27]Zhang Z,Xu S F,Li J H,et al.J Agric Food Chem,2011,60(1):180
    [28]Lin W,Wei S B,Jiang R F,et al.Anal Chim Acta,2016,933:117
    [29]Niu X Y,Ding S Y,Wang W F,et al.J Chromatogr A,2016,1436:109
    [30]Yin D,Chen Y L,Zhang Y H,et al.Chromatographia,2018,81(5):749
    [31]Chen Y L,Zhang W F,Zhang Y H,et al.J Chromatogr A,2018,1556:1
    [32]Zhang W F,Zhang Y H,Zhou L L,et al.Anal Methods,2016,8(17):3613
    [33]Liu H Y,Yang J F,LüJ L,et al.Chemical Industry Times,2014,28(12):15刘环宇,杨剑锋,吕君亮,等.化工时刊,2014,28(12):15
    [34]Liu R Y,Hei W J,He P L,et al.J Chromatogr B,2011,879(24):2416

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700