不同情绪面孔刺激影响ADHD患儿持续注意任务事件相关电位
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Different Emotion Face Stimulus Will Affect ADHD Children's Sustained Attention Activity Relevant Potential
- 论文作者：刘世燕 ; 张文武 ; 丁士炬 ; 李湘兰 ; 胡珍玉 ; 程芳
- 英文论文作者：LIU Shi-Yan ; ZHANG Wen-Wu ; DING Shi-Ju ; LI Xiang Lan ; Hu Zhen Yu ; Cheng Fang ; Kangning Hospital
- 年：2014
- 作者机构：宁波市康宁医院;
- 论文关键词：注意缺陷多动障碍 ; 儿童 ; 情绪面孔 ; 持续注意 ; 事件相关电位
- 英文论文关键词：Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ; emotional faces ; child ; sustained attention ; event related potentials(ERP)
- 会议召开时间：2014-11-20
- 会议录名称：2014浙江省医学会精神病学分会学术年会、浙江省医师协会精神科医师分会第七届年会论文汇编
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：R749.94
- 学会代码：ZJKX
- 会议名称：2014浙江省医学会精神病学分会学术年会、浙江省医师协会精神科医师分会第七届年会
- 会议地点：中国浙江湖州
- 主办单位：浙江省医学会精神病学分会（The Society of Psychiatry ; ZJMA）、浙江省医师协会精神科医师分会
- 学会名称：浙江省科学技术协会
- 页数：5
- 文件大小：416k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：地方
摘要
目的:了解不同情绪面孔刺激下ADHD患儿执行持续注意任务时的事件相关电位特征。方法:选取符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-Ⅳ)诊断标准的混合型ADHD患儿32例(年龄9-15岁)及年龄、性别匹配的正常对照组儿童32例,要求被试在高兴、中性、恐惧和愤怒等四种情绪面孔刺激随机呈现后执行注意与选择任务,同时记录事件相关电位。观察ADHD患者和正常对照组儿童面孔诱发的N170电位及靶刺激诱发的P300电位的特征。结果:ADHD组患儿在四种不同情绪面孔刺激下颞枕区面孔特异性N170波波幅均低于对照组例恐惧[(17.7±9.5)uv vs.(25.8±14.0)uv,P<0.05],顶枕区P300潜伏期长于对照组例恐惧[454.2±51.3)ms vs.(433.0±29.8)ms,P<0.05]。ADHD患者组在不同情绪面孔诱发的N170波幅和潜伏期差异无统计学意义,诱发的P300以恐惧面孔刺激后执行注意任务的P300波幅最低,潜伏期最长。结论:在四种不同情绪面孔刺激下ADHD患儿以恐惧面孔刺激引起N170,P300波幅最低,且P300潜伏期延长最明显,提示恐惧面孔影响ADHD患儿情绪调节,并影响其持续注意过程。
Objective:To study ADHD children's brain potential evoked by different emotion faces when they are on the sustained attention tasks.Methods:so select 32 ADHD children aging from 9 to 15,diagnosed on the base of USA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM-IV),and 32 normal children of the same age and gender.Attendees to be asked to fulfill the assignment like attention and selection after they are presented with four faces of joy,neutral,fear,anger and relative portal will be recorded.To observe the N170 potentials evoked by emotion faces and P300 potentials evoked by target stimulus of ADHD children and normal children.Results:ADHD children's specific N170 wave amplitude in the temporal occipital is smaller than normal children's when stimulated by emotion face.As for under the fear face stimulus,the figure comes as[(17.7±9.5)uv vs.(25.8±14.0)uv,P<0.05].ADHD children's P300 latency in parital occipital is longer than normal children's when stimulated by emotion face.As for under the fear face stimulus,the figure comes as[454.2±51.3)ms vs.(433.0±29.8)ms,P<0.05].However,ADHD children's evoked N170 amplitude and latency has no big difference under the four emotion face conditions.As for the evoked P300 amplitude and latency of ADHD children when they are on the sustained attention task,the p300 amplitude comes as the smallest and the latency comes the longest when ADHD children are stimulated by fear face.Conclusion:fADHD children's N170 and P300 amplitude ranks smallest under the fear face stimulation and its p300 latency prolonging comes the most obvious,which means the fear face affect ADHD children's emotion regulation and further affect their sustained attention.
Objective:To study ADHD children's brain potential evoked by different emotion faces when they are on the sustained attention tasks.Methods:so select 32 ADHD children aging from 9 to 15,diagnosed on the base of USA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM-IV),and 32 normal children of the same age and gender.Attendees to be asked to fulfill the assignment like attention and selection after they are presented with four faces of joy,neutral,fear,anger and relative portal will be recorded.To observe the N170 potentials evoked by emotion faces and P300 potentials evoked by target stimulus of ADHD children and normal children.Results:ADHD children's specific N170 wave amplitude in the temporal occipital is smaller than normal children's when stimulated by emotion face.As for under the fear face stimulus,the figure comes as[(17.7±9.5)uv vs.(25.8±14.0)uv,P<0.05].ADHD children's P300 latency in parital occipital is longer than normal children's when stimulated by emotion face.As for under the fear face stimulus,the figure comes as[454.2±51.3)ms vs.(433.0±29.8)ms,P<0.05].However,ADHD children's evoked N170 amplitude and latency has no big difference under the four emotion face conditions.As for the evoked P300 amplitude and latency of ADHD children when they are on the sustained attention task,the p300 amplitude comes as the smallest and the latency comes the longest when ADHD children are stimulated by fear face.Conclusion:fADHD children's N170 and P300 amplitude ranks smallest under the fear face stimulation and its p300 latency prolonging comes the most obvious,which means the fear face affect ADHD children's emotion regulation and further affect their sustained attention.
引文
[1]Barkley RA.ttention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder:A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment[M].The Guilford Press,New York,2005.
[2]Barkley RA.Fischer M.The unique contribution of emotional impulsiveness to impairment in major life activities in hyperactive children as adults[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.2010,49(5):503-513.
[3]Maedgen JW,Carlson CL.Social functioning and emotional regulation in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes[J].Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.2000,29(1):30-42.
[4]Corbett B,Glidden H.Processing affective stimuli in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder[J].Child Neuropsychol.2000,6(2):144-155.
[5]Pelc K,Kornreich C,Foisy ML,et al.Recognition of emotional facial expressions in attention-d eficit hyperactivity disorder[J].Pediatr Neurol.2006,35(2):93-97.
[6]美国精神病学会.诊断与统计手册:精神障碍第四版(DSM-Ⅵ)[M].颜文伟,译.上海:上海精神医学,1994.
[7]龚耀先.蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993.
[8]王妍,罗跃嘉.大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13:396~398.
[9]Williams LM,Hermens DF,Palmer D,et al.Misinterpreting emotional expressions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:evidence for a neural marker and stimulant effects[J].Biol psychiatry.2008,63(10):917-926.
[10]Biehl SC,Ehlis AC,M(u|¨)ller LD,et al.The impact of task relevance and degree of distraction on stimulus processing[J].BMC Neurosci.2013,1(14):107.
[11]Ibanez A,Petroni A,Urquina H,et al.Cortical deficits of emotional face processing in adults with ADHD:its relationto social cognition and executive function.Soc Neurosci[J].2011,6(6):464-481.
[12]CauqmlAs,Edmonds Ge,Tayylor Mj.Is the face Rensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention[J].Neuroreport.2000,11(10):2167-2171.
[13]K(o|¨)chelA,LeutgebV,SchienleA.Affective inhibitor contrlina attention deficit hyperactivity disorder:abnormalities in electrocortical late positivity[TJ.Neurosci Lett.2012 Nov 14:530(1):47-52
[14]Kochel A,Leutgeb V,Schienle A.Disrupted Response Inhibition Toward Facial Anger Cues in Children With Attention-DeficitHyperactivity Disorder(ADHD):An Event-Related Potential Study[J].Child Neurol.2014,29(4):459-468.
[15]Roth RM,Saykin AJ.Executive dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:cognitive and neuroimaging findings[J].Psychiatr Clin North Am.2004;27(1):83-96.
[16]丁岩,王玉平.情绪信息刺激对视觉认知过程的影响[J].中国临床康复,2005,,28(9):152-155.
[17]Singhal A,Shafer AT,Russell M,et al.Electrophysiological correlates of fearful and sad distraction on target processing in adolescents with attentiondeficit-hyperactivity symptoms and affective disorders[J].Front Integr Neurosci.2012,19(6):119.
[18]杜忆,吴玺宏,李量.杏仁核对感觉刺激的情绪性加工:自动化过程和注意调控过程的整合[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(6):1020-1027.
[2]Barkley RA.Fischer M.The unique contribution of emotional impulsiveness to impairment in major life activities in hyperactive children as adults[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.2010,49(5):503-513.
[3]Maedgen JW,Carlson CL.Social functioning and emotional regulation in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes[J].Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.2000,29(1):30-42.
[4]Corbett B,Glidden H.Processing affective stimuli in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder[J].Child Neuropsychol.2000,6(2):144-155.
[5]Pelc K,Kornreich C,Foisy ML,et al.Recognition of emotional facial expressions in attention-d eficit hyperactivity disorder[J].Pediatr Neurol.2006,35(2):93-97.
[6]美国精神病学会.诊断与统计手册:精神障碍第四版(DSM-Ⅵ)[M].颜文伟,译.上海:上海精神医学,1994.
[7]龚耀先.蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993.
[8]王妍,罗跃嘉.大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13:396~398.
[9]Williams LM,Hermens DF,Palmer D,et al.Misinterpreting emotional expressions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:evidence for a neural marker and stimulant effects[J].Biol psychiatry.2008,63(10):917-926.
[10]Biehl SC,Ehlis AC,M(u|¨)ller LD,et al.The impact of task relevance and degree of distraction on stimulus processing[J].BMC Neurosci.2013,1(14):107.
[11]Ibanez A,Petroni A,Urquina H,et al.Cortical deficits of emotional face processing in adults with ADHD:its relationto social cognition and executive function.Soc Neurosci[J].2011,6(6):464-481.
[12]CauqmlAs,Edmonds Ge,Tayylor Mj.Is the face Rensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention[J].Neuroreport.2000,11(10):2167-2171.
[13]K(o|¨)chelA,LeutgebV,SchienleA.Affective inhibitor contrlina attention deficit hyperactivity disorder:abnormalities in electrocortical late positivity[TJ.Neurosci Lett.2012 Nov 14:530(1):47-52
[14]Kochel A,Leutgeb V,Schienle A.Disrupted Response Inhibition Toward Facial Anger Cues in Children With Attention-DeficitHyperactivity Disorder(ADHD):An Event-Related Potential Study[J].Child Neurol.2014,29(4):459-468.
[15]Roth RM,Saykin AJ.Executive dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:cognitive and neuroimaging findings[J].Psychiatr Clin North Am.2004;27(1):83-96.
[16]丁岩,王玉平.情绪信息刺激对视觉认知过程的影响[J].中国临床康复,2005,,28(9):152-155.
[17]Singhal A,Shafer AT,Russell M,et al.Electrophysiological correlates of fearful and sad distraction on target processing in adolescents with attentiondeficit-hyperactivity symptoms and affective disorders[J].Front Integr Neurosci.2012,19(6):119.
[18]杜忆,吴玺宏,李量.杏仁核对感觉刺激的情绪性加工:自动化过程和注意调控过程的整合[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(6):1020-1027.