父母的网络利弊权衡对青少年网络成瘾的影响:性别的调节效应
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Parents' Internet Decisional Balance Impacts Adolescents' Internet Addiction:Moderating Effect of Gender
- 论文作者：郭亚飞 ; 金盛华
- 英文论文作者：Guo Yafei ; Jin Shenghua ; School of Psychology ; Beijing Normal University
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：北京师范大学心理学院;
- 论文关键词：网络利弊权衡 ; 青少年 ; 网络成瘾倾向 ; 性别
- 英文论文关键词：Internet decisional balance ; adolescents ; Internet addiction ; gender
- 会议召开时间：2015-10-16
- 会议录名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议摘要集——心理学与社会发展
- 英文会议录名称：Proceedings of the 18th National Academic Congress of Psychology
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：C913.4;C913.5
- 学会代码：ZGXG
- 会议名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议
- 会议地点：中国天津
- 主办单位：中国心理学会
- 学会名称：中国心理学会
- 页数：3
- 文件大小：857k
- 原文格式：D
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
为了考察青少年的家庭环境对其网络成瘾倾向的影响,以及家庭环境与个体之间的交互作用,本研究从贵州、江苏、云南、内蒙古等十个省份地区选取4500名中小学生,其中共有1209名青少年学生有父母的配对数据,男生占41.7%,女生占54.1%,平均年龄为13.08(SD=2.45),分别采用方晓义等人编写的《网络利弊权衡量表》和Young的《网络成瘾调查问卷》测量父母对青少年网络使用的权衡态度以及青少年的网络成瘾倾向得分。结果发现:1)父母的利弊权衡对青少年的网络成瘾倾向存在显著的负向预测作用(β=‐.303,p=.002),即父母认为网络对青少年的有益之处越多,青少年的网络成瘾倾向会越低,反之,父母知觉到的网络坏处越多,青少年的网络成瘾倾向则会越高;2)青少年的性别在网络成瘾倾向上面有显著差异(β=.062,p=.041),男生的网络成瘾倾向显著高于女生;3)父母的利弊权衡与青少年的性别之间存在显著的交互作用,β=0.087,t(1,1085)=2.135,p=.033,η~2=.004;简单斜率分析发现,对于男生来说,父母的利弊权衡能显著地负向预测其网络成瘾倾向,β=.161,t(1,463)=3.499,p=.001;对于女生来说,父母的利弊权衡则不能预测其网络成瘾倾向,β=.045,t(1,622)=1.123,p=.262.结论:1)父母是青少年校外活动的主要监护人,父母对网络的权衡态度直接决定着青少年接触网络的机会和时间、频率,本研究发现父母主观评价的网络使用对青少年的影响会显著影响其网络成瘾的倾向;2)父母的利弊权衡对青少年网路成瘾倾向的作用在不同性别之间有一定差异,对于男生来说,父母的利弊权衡能够显著负向预测其网络成瘾倾向,对于女生来说,父母的利弊权衡则无法预测网络成瘾倾向。因此,对于青少年网络成瘾的干预存在性别的不同,对于男生来说,来自父母的家庭环境的监督和引导比较重要,而对于女生而言,除了父母的监督之外还需要考虑其他因素如同伴的影响等,采取多种方式综合的干预方法。
In order to examine the effect of family environment on adolescents' Internet addiction and if this effect was moderated by gender, a large scale survey was conducted in present study. With the adoption of Internet Addiction Decisional Balance Questionnaire and Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire, 4,500 adolescents from 10 provinces and regions were investigated in this survey, of which 1209 data were matched by data from parents. The results revealed that, 1) Parents' Internet decisional balance significantly negatively predicted adolescents' degree of addiction to Internet(β=-.303, p=.002), such that when parents held positively toward Internet's influence on their children, adolescents would get higher scores on Internet addiction; 2) Male adolescents scored significantly higher than female(β=.062, p=.041); 3) An interaction between parents' Internet decisional balance and gender emerged, β =.087, t(1, 1085)=2.135, p =.033, η~2=.004. Simple slope analysis revealed that for male adolescents, parents' Internet decisional balance could significantly negatively predict their online addiction, β=.161, t(1, 463) =3.499, p=.001, whereas for female adolescents, parents' Internet decisional balance could not significantly predict their online addiction, β=.045, t(1, 622) =1.123, p=.262. To conclude, parents, as the major custody outside school, have direct control over adolescents' time and frequency of online surfing, and thereby can display an impact on their children's addiction to Internet. Moreover, this effect would be moderated by gender, specifically, this effect would be effective for male adolescents but not for female. Therefore, in terms of intervention, gender differences should be considered as well. For male adolescents, family supervision and regulation may prove to be necessary and efficient, whereas for female, more effective methods for intervention should be further examined.
In order to examine the effect of family environment on adolescents' Internet addiction and if this effect was moderated by gender, a large scale survey was conducted in present study. With the adoption of Internet Addiction Decisional Balance Questionnaire and Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire, 4,500 adolescents from 10 provinces and regions were investigated in this survey, of which 1209 data were matched by data from parents. The results revealed that, 1) Parents' Internet decisional balance significantly negatively predicted adolescents' degree of addiction to Internet(β=-.303, p=.002), such that when parents held positively toward Internet's influence on their children, adolescents would get higher scores on Internet addiction; 2) Male adolescents scored significantly higher than female(β=.062, p=.041); 3) An interaction between parents' Internet decisional balance and gender emerged, β =.087, t(1, 1085)=2.135, p =.033, η~2=.004. Simple slope analysis revealed that for male adolescents, parents' Internet decisional balance could significantly negatively predict their online addiction, β=.161, t(1, 463) =3.499, p=.001, whereas for female adolescents, parents' Internet decisional balance could not significantly predict their online addiction, β=.045, t(1, 622) =1.123, p=.262. To conclude, parents, as the major custody outside school, have direct control over adolescents' time and frequency of online surfing, and thereby can display an impact on their children's addiction to Internet. Moreover, this effect would be moderated by gender, specifically, this effect would be effective for male adolescents but not for female. Therefore, in terms of intervention, gender differences should be considered as well. For male adolescents, family supervision and regulation may prove to be necessary and efficient, whereas for female, more effective methods for intervention should be further examined.
引文