论《大宪章》对美国征收条款历史变迁的影响
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 论文作者：孙聪
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：中南财经政法大学法学院;
- 论文关键词：《大宪章》 ; 美国征收条款 ; 制度变迁
- 会议召开时间：2015-10-24
- 会议录名称：全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——《大宪章》800年
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：D956.1;DD911;D971.2
- 学会代码：WFZS
- 会议名称：全国外国法制史研究会第二十八届年会
- 会议地点：中国广西南宁
- 主办单位：全国外国法制史研究会
- 学会名称：全国外国法制史研究会
- 页数：18
- 文件大小：788k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
《大宪章》是人类法治文明史上的重要文献之一,对现代法治文明的发展具有重要影响。美国的征收条款在现代化的过程中就深受《大宪章》的影响,具体表现为以下两个方面:第一,在制度建构方面,征收条款自革命前的古典时期萌芽至《权利法案》颁布的现代化时期形成,其间不论是州还是联邦都直接借鉴了《大宪章》中的制度因素,从而使征收条款一直具备限制权力、保障权利的属性。第二,在观念影响方面,《大宪章》先是为古典时期的征收制度的建构提供了保障自由权利的观念基因;后又在征收条款的现代化时期,通过理论家运用自然法理论编织的大宪章神话,实现了征收权的合理化和民主化,最终完成了征收条款从古典向现代的历史变迁。通过对这段制度变迁历史的挖掘,有助于为征收条款提供更为一致的解释框架。
引文
(1)See Bryan A.Garner,and Henry Campbell Black,Black's Law Dictionary,9th ed,St.Paul,MN:Thomson/West,2009m p.601.
(2)See Daniel P.Dalton,"A History of Eminent Domain",Public Corporation Law Quarterly,No.3,2006,p.1.
(3)See Ibid.,p.1.
(1)U.S.C.A.Const.Amend.V.
(2)See Stowell v.Flagg.ll Mass.364(1814).
(3)See Harding v.Goodlett,ll Tenn.(3 Yer.)40(1832).
(4)See Berman v.Parker,348 U.S.26(1954),Hawaii Housing Authority v.Midkiff,467 U.S.229(1984),Poletown Neighborhood Council v.City of Detroit,410 Mich.616(1981).
(5)See Kelo v.City of New London,545 U.S.469(2005).
(6)John G.Sprankling,Understanding Property Law,Matthew Bender&Company,Inc.,2013,pp.831-834.
(1)Lochner v.New York,198 U.S.45,53(1905).
(1)See William Michael Treanor,"The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment",Yale Law Journal,Vol.94,No.3,1985.
(2)See John F.Hart,"Colonial Land Use Law and Its Significance for Modern Takings Doctrine",Harvard Law Review,Vol.109,No.6,1996.
(3)Lindsay v.Commissioners,2 S.C.L.38(1796).
(4)M'clenachan v.Curwen,6 Binn.509(1806).
(5)Treanor,The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment,p.697.
(1)Lindsay,2 S.C.L.p.38.
(2)Treanor,The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment,p.699.
(3)Lindsay,2 S.C.L.p.38.see also Mtlenachan 6 Binn.at 509.
(1)Province Laws 1713,ch.15.
(2)Stowell v.Flagg,11 Mass.364(1814).
(3)See Jr.Philip Nichols,“The Meaning of Public Use in the Law of Eminent Domain",B.U.L.Rev,Vol,20,1940,p.615.
(4)See Harding v.Goodlett,11 Tenn.(3 Yer.)40(1832).See Emily A.Johnson,"Reconciling Originalism and the History of the Public Use Clause",Fordham L Rev,Vol.79,2010,p.265.
(1)William Michael Treanor,"The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process",Colum.L.Rev,Vol.95,1995,p.782,pp.786-787.
(2)Ralph V.Turner,Magna Carta-Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.Longman,2003,p.231.
(3)Treanor,The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process,pp.787-788.
(4)参见[美]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,沈宗美校,上海人民出版社2008年版,第78页。
(1)See Ostler,Duane L,"Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clause at the Founding of the Republic",Campbell L.Rev,Vo\.32,2009,p.227.
(2)16B Am.Jur.2d Constitutional Law§716.
(3)Vt.Const,of 1777,ch.I,art.II,http://www.leg.state,vt.us/statutes/const2.htm.
(4)Mass.Const,of 1780,part I,art.X,https://malegislature.gov/Laws/Constitution#pageTop.
(5)Northwest Ordinance of 1787,art.2,http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp.
(1)Ralph V.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,V ed.Longman,2003,p.231.
(2)See Peter J.Kulick,"Rolling the Dice:Determining Public Use in Order to Effectuate a Public-Private Taking-A Proposal to Redefine Public Use",L.Rev.MSU-DCL,2000,p.639,643.
(3)参见[美]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,沈宗美校,上海人民出版社2008年版,第85~86页。
(4)参见[美]斯科特·戈登:《控制国家》,应奇、陈丽微、孟军、李勇译,江苏人民出版社2008年版,第257~262页。
(1)See Treanor,The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process,p.787.
(2)See John F.Hart,"Property Rights,Costs,and Welfare:Delaware Water Mill Legislation,1719-1859",The Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.27,No.2,1998,p.455,n.3&n.4.
(3)Ibid,p.455,n.5.
(1)Northwest Ordinance of 1787,art.2,http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp.
(2)See William Michael Treanor,"The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment",Yale Law Journal,Vol.94,No.3,1985,p.782,855.
(3)See W.S.McKechnie,Magna Carta:A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John,2~(nd)ed.,J.Maclehose and sons,1914,p.105.
(4)See Ibid.,p.106.
(5)See Ibid,p.107.
(1)See W.S.McKechnie,Magna Carta:A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John,2~(nd)ed.,J.Maclehose and sons,1914,p.108.
(2)See Ibid.,p.110.
(3)See Ibid.pp.115-116.
(4)See Ibid.p.119.
(1)[美]卡尔文·达伍德:《威廉·布莱克斯通与英美法理学》,张志铭译,载《南京大学法律评论》1996年秋季号,第4页。
(2)See Sir William Blackstone,Commentaries on the Laws of England,Vol.1,Portland;T.B.Wait Company,1807,pp.38-40.
(1)参见[美]卡尔文·达伍德:《威廉·布莱克斯通与英美法理学》,张志铭译,载《南京大学法律评论》1996年秋季号,第12~13页。
(2)参见[美]莫顿·J.霍维茨:《美国法的变迁:1780~1860》,谢鸿飞译,中国政法大学出版社2004年版,第13~16页。
(3)See Sir William Blackstone,Commentaries on the Laws of England,Vol.1,Portland:T.B.Wait Company,1807,pp.43-44,49.
(1)Ralph v.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.,Longman,2003,p.209.
(2)[美]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,沈宗美校,上海人民出版社2008年版,第81页。
(3)See Ralph v.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.Longman,2003,p.209.
(4)See Ibid.,p.211.
(1)See Ralph v.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.Longman,2003,p.213.
(2)See Daniel P.Dalton,"A History of Eminent Domain",Public Corporation Law Quarterly,No.3,2006,p.1.
(3)See Ibid.,p.1.
(1)U.S.C.A.Const.Amend.V.
(2)See Stowell v.Flagg.ll Mass.364(1814).
(3)See Harding v.Goodlett,ll Tenn.(3 Yer.)40(1832).
(4)See Berman v.Parker,348 U.S.26(1954),Hawaii Housing Authority v.Midkiff,467 U.S.229(1984),Poletown Neighborhood Council v.City of Detroit,410 Mich.616(1981).
(5)See Kelo v.City of New London,545 U.S.469(2005).
(6)John G.Sprankling,Understanding Property Law,Matthew Bender&Company,Inc.,2013,pp.831-834.
(1)Lochner v.New York,198 U.S.45,53(1905).
(1)See William Michael Treanor,"The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment",Yale Law Journal,Vol.94,No.3,1985.
(2)See John F.Hart,"Colonial Land Use Law and Its Significance for Modern Takings Doctrine",Harvard Law Review,Vol.109,No.6,1996.
(3)Lindsay v.Commissioners,2 S.C.L.38(1796).
(4)M'clenachan v.Curwen,6 Binn.509(1806).
(5)Treanor,The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment,p.697.
(1)Lindsay,2 S.C.L.p.38.
(2)Treanor,The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment,p.699.
(3)Lindsay,2 S.C.L.p.38.see also Mtlenachan 6 Binn.at 509.
(1)Province Laws 1713,ch.15.
(2)Stowell v.Flagg,11 Mass.364(1814).
(3)See Jr.Philip Nichols,“The Meaning of Public Use in the Law of Eminent Domain",B.U.L.Rev,Vol,20,1940,p.615.
(4)See Harding v.Goodlett,11 Tenn.(3 Yer.)40(1832).See Emily A.Johnson,"Reconciling Originalism and the History of the Public Use Clause",Fordham L Rev,Vol.79,2010,p.265.
(1)William Michael Treanor,"The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process",Colum.L.Rev,Vol.95,1995,p.782,pp.786-787.
(2)Ralph V.Turner,Magna Carta-Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.Longman,2003,p.231.
(3)Treanor,The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process,pp.787-788.
(4)参见[美]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,沈宗美校,上海人民出版社2008年版,第78页。
(1)See Ostler,Duane L,"Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clause at the Founding of the Republic",Campbell L.Rev,Vo\.32,2009,p.227.
(2)16B Am.Jur.2d Constitutional Law§716.
(3)Vt.Const,of 1777,ch.I,art.II,http://www.leg.state,vt.us/statutes/const2.htm.
(4)Mass.Const,of 1780,part I,art.X,https://malegislature.gov/Laws/Constitution#pageTop.
(5)Northwest Ordinance of 1787,art.2,http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp.
(1)Ralph V.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,V ed.Longman,2003,p.231.
(2)See Peter J.Kulick,"Rolling the Dice:Determining Public Use in Order to Effectuate a Public-Private Taking-A Proposal to Redefine Public Use",L.Rev.MSU-DCL,2000,p.639,643.
(3)参见[美]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,沈宗美校,上海人民出版社2008年版,第85~86页。
(4)参见[美]斯科特·戈登:《控制国家》,应奇、陈丽微、孟军、李勇译,江苏人民出版社2008年版,第257~262页。
(1)See Treanor,The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process,p.787.
(2)See John F.Hart,"Property Rights,Costs,and Welfare:Delaware Water Mill Legislation,1719-1859",The Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.27,No.2,1998,p.455,n.3&n.4.
(3)Ibid,p.455,n.5.
(1)Northwest Ordinance of 1787,art.2,http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp.
(2)See William Michael Treanor,"The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment",Yale Law Journal,Vol.94,No.3,1985,p.782,855.
(3)See W.S.McKechnie,Magna Carta:A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John,2~(nd)ed.,J.Maclehose and sons,1914,p.105.
(4)See Ibid.,p.106.
(5)See Ibid,p.107.
(1)See W.S.McKechnie,Magna Carta:A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John,2~(nd)ed.,J.Maclehose and sons,1914,p.108.
(2)See Ibid.,p.110.
(3)See Ibid.pp.115-116.
(4)See Ibid.p.119.
(1)[美]卡尔文·达伍德:《威廉·布莱克斯通与英美法理学》,张志铭译,载《南京大学法律评论》1996年秋季号,第4页。
(2)See Sir William Blackstone,Commentaries on the Laws of England,Vol.1,Portland;T.B.Wait Company,1807,pp.38-40.
(1)参见[美]卡尔文·达伍德:《威廉·布莱克斯通与英美法理学》,张志铭译,载《南京大学法律评论》1996年秋季号,第12~13页。
(2)参见[美]莫顿·J.霍维茨:《美国法的变迁:1780~1860》,谢鸿飞译,中国政法大学出版社2004年版,第13~16页。
(3)See Sir William Blackstone,Commentaries on the Laws of England,Vol.1,Portland:T.B.Wait Company,1807,pp.43-44,49.
(1)Ralph v.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.,Longman,2003,p.209.
(2)[美]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,沈宗美校,上海人民出版社2008年版,第81页。
(3)See Ralph v.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.Longman,2003,p.209.
(4)See Ibid.,p.211.
(1)See Ralph v.Turner,Magna Carta:Through the Ages,1~(st)ed.Longman,2003,p.213.