区分小儿感染类型中血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验的临床价值评价
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 论文作者：温璐
- 年：2017
- 作者机构：河北省张家口市宣化区妇幼保健站检验科;
- 论文关键词：小儿感染 ; 血常规 ; C-反应蛋白 ; 临床价值
- 英文论文关键词：Pediatric infection ; Blood routine ; C-reactive protein ; Clinical value
- 会议召开时间：2017-05-26
- 会议录名称：2017年《中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志》临床研讨会论文集
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：R446.1;R725.1
- 学会代码：ZHXB
- 会议名称：2017年《中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志》临床研讨会
- 会议地点：中国湖北武汉
- 主办单位：《中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志》社有限公司
- 学会名称：《中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志》社有限公司
- 页数：1
- 文件大小：124k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
目的:对血常规联合C-反应蛋白(CRP)检验在区分小儿感染类型中的临床效果进行讨论与分析。方法:在我院自2015年8月至2016年8月接收治疗的感染性疾病患儿共100例,依据临床诊断的不同分为对照组与观察组,每组各50例,对照组患儿为病毒感染类型,观察组患儿为细菌感染类型,对所有患儿分别进行血常规检验与C-反应蛋白检验,另外对观察组患儿行血常规联合CRP检验,对比两组患儿的白细胞计数(WBC)、CRP浓度和观察组患儿的阳性检出率。结果:通过临床数据对比,发现观察组的WBC计数016.73±3.72)×109/L、CRP浓度(38.59±10.12)mg/L明显高于对照组的(5.92±1.39)×109/L、(4.35±1.78)mg/L;且观察组患儿应用血常规联合C-反应蛋白(CRP)检验的阳性检出率(94.0%)明显高于单独血常规检验的阳性检出率(62.0%)、CRP检验阳性检出率(66.0%),对比差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验可明确诊断患儿的感染类型,临床应用价值高,值得推广。
Objective:To discuss and analyze the clinical effect of blood routine combined with C-reactive protein(CRP) test in differentiating children from infection.Methods:A total of 100 children with infectious diseases were enrolled in our hospital from August 2015 to August 2016.According to the clinical diagnosis,the patients were divided into control group and observation group,50 cases in each group,and the control group The blood group and the C-reactive protein test were performed in all the children,and the blood test and CRP test were performed on the children in the observation group,and the white blood cells of the two groups were compared.Count(WBC),CRP concentration and the positive rate of detection of children in the observation group.Results:Compared with the control group,the WBC count(16.73±3.72) × 109/L and the CRP concentration(38.59±10.12)mg/L in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(5.92±1.93) × 109/L and(4.35±1.78)mg/L,respectively.The positive rate of blood test and C-reactive protein(CRP) test in the observation group was 94.0%(62.0%) and the positive rate of CRP test(66.0%).The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Blood test combined with C-reactive protein test can confirm the type of infection in children,clinical application value is high,worthy of promotion.
Objective:To discuss and analyze the clinical effect of blood routine combined with C-reactive protein(CRP) test in differentiating children from infection.Methods:A total of 100 children with infectious diseases were enrolled in our hospital from August 2015 to August 2016.According to the clinical diagnosis,the patients were divided into control group and observation group,50 cases in each group,and the control group The blood group and the C-reactive protein test were performed in all the children,and the blood test and CRP test were performed on the children in the observation group,and the white blood cells of the two groups were compared.Count(WBC),CRP concentration and the positive rate of detection of children in the observation group.Results:Compared with the control group,the WBC count(16.73±3.72) × 109/L and the CRP concentration(38.59±10.12)mg/L in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(5.92±1.93) × 109/L and(4.35±1.78)mg/L,respectively.The positive rate of blood test and C-reactive protein(CRP) test in the observation group was 94.0%(62.0%) and the positive rate of CRP test(66.0%).The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Blood test combined with C-reactive protein test can confirm the type of infection in children,clinical application value is high,worthy of promotion.
引文
[1]王申.血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验在区分小儿感染类型中的临床价值[J].中国实用医药,2015,(4):40-41.
[2]李任英,曹立娟.血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验对小儿感染类型的区分作用分析[J].心理医生,2015,21(14):83-84.
[3]吴能利.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断分析[J].中外女性健康研究,2016,(15):32,40.
[4]孙晓华.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断作用探讨[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(13):43-44.
[5]李青.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2015,(16):2446-2447.
[6]王武华.全血C反应蛋白和血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(34):6863-6864.
[7]何新民.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值分析[J].中外医疗,2016,35(17):110-111.
[2]李任英,曹立娟.血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验对小儿感染类型的区分作用分析[J].心理医生,2015,21(14):83-84.
[3]吴能利.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断分析[J].中外女性健康研究,2016,(15):32,40.
[4]孙晓华.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断作用探讨[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(13):43-44.
[5]李青.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2015,(16):2446-2447.
[6]王武华.全血C反应蛋白和血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(34):6863-6864.
[7]何新民.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值分析[J].中外医疗,2016,35(17):110-111.