海拔对烤烟品种NC102和NC297物理特性和化学成分的影响
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
为探讨昆明烟区美引烤烟新品种NC102、NC297的海拔适应性,在栽培措施一致的前提下,分别在安宁县和嵩明县的2个植烟乡镇,以每100 m为海拔梯度,从海拔1700~2200 m共布置10个试验点,研究了种植海拔对两品种烤烟物理性状和化学成分含量的影响。结果表明:①烟叶化学成分和物理性状对种植海拔的敏感性表现为化学成分>物理性状;②在1700~2200 m的研究范围内,烟叶单叶重、开片度、总氮、钾、绿原酸和芸香苷与海拔高度呈显著或极显著负相关,含梗率、总糖和还原糖与海拔呈显著或极显著正相关;③综合烟叶常规化学成分、多酚和香气物质含量认为,昆明烟区美引烤烟新品种NC102和NC297均更适宜种植在1700~1900 m的海拔区间,且烟叶品质表现为NC102>NC297。
Altitude adaptability of tobacco varieties of NC102 and NC297 were determined in two main tobacco growing townships in Anning and Songming county, Kunming City. Date were collected in experiments conducted at 10 sites at every 100 m in the altitude range of 1700~2200 m, where cultivation practices were largely consistent. The effects of altitude on physical properties and chemical components of flue-cured tobacco were determined. The result indicated that: ①The chemical components of leaves were more sensitive to altitude than the physical properties. ②In the 1700~2200 m altitude range, altitude was significantly or extremely significantly negative correlated with leaf single leaf weight, opening degree, content of total nitrogen, potassium, chlorogenic acid and rutin. Also in the 1700~2200 m altitude range, altitude was significantly or extremely significantly positive correlation with stem ratio, total sugar and reducing sugar content. ③In summary, the integrate analysis showed that leaf chemical components, polyphenol content and aroma properties of NC102 and NC297 were optimum at an altitude range of 1700~1900 m in Kunming City, and the tobacco leaf quality decreased in order as follows: NC102>NC297.
引文
[1]贾关华,冯全福,王元英,等.烤烟新品种中烟202(CF202)的选育及其主要性状鉴定[J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(1):1-6.
    [2]唐进驹.试论特色烟叶的形成和开发[J].中国烟草科学,2004,25(1):10-13.
    [3]李军营,方敦煌,宋春满,等.烤烟品种间烟叶化学成分含量对海拔高度的响应[J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(2):17-23.
    [4]罗华元,马剑雄,徐关阳,等.引迚美国烤烟品种对海拔高度的敏感性研究[J].中国烟草学报,2010,16(2):50-54.
    [5]徐益群,田育天,张留臣,等.美引烤烟品种NC297不同海拔生态适应性研究[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(22):167-172.
    [6]杨洪雄,徐关阳,罗华元,等.云南烟区推广种植NC102与NC297品种的良区良法配套方案探索[J].昆明学院学报,2011,33(6):23-26.
    [7]邓小华,陈东林,周冀衡,等.湖南烤烟物理性状比较及聚类评价[J].中国烟草科学,2009,30(3):63-68.
    [8]王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
    [9]杜瑞华,周明松.连续流动分析法在烟草分析中的应用[J].中国测试技术,2007,33(3):76-78.
    [10]王育军,周冀衡,张一扬,等.不同打叶时间对烤烟产质量和化学成分的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2014,29(1):78-83.
    [11]拓阳阳,赵铭钦,张广富,等.延边地区烤烟主要化学成分与中性香气物质的兲系[J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(3):37-41.
    [12]杨杰,王昌全,冯广林,等.四川凉山烟区红大烟叶化学成分可用性综合评价[J].烟草科技,2013(11):48-51.
    [13]沈晗,周冀衡,赵百东,等.云南保山烟区主栽品种海拔适应性研究[J].中国烟草学报,2013,19(5):29-35.
    [14]钟庆辉.烟草芳香吃味化学挃标的探索[J].烟草科技,2000(1):27-28.
    [15]铁军,毕庆文,何结望,等.湖北烤烟感官质量状况及与其它质量的兲系分析[J].中国烟草科学,2008,29(6):7-11.
    [16]陈传孟,陈继树,谷堂生,等.南岭山区不同海拔烤烟品质研究[J].中国烟草科学,1997,18(4):8-12.
    [17]李自强,刘新民,董建新,等.罗平县海拔高度和土壤类型与烟叶化学成分的兲系[J].中国烟草科学,2010,31(5):45-48.
    [18]王世英,卢红,杨骥,等.不同种植海拔高度对曲靖地区烤烟主要化学成分的影响[J].西南农业学报,2007,20(1):45-48.
    [19]李向阳,邓建华,张晓海,等.云南烟区不同海拔高度区间烤烟气象因子分析[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(3):877-881.
    [20]徐关阳,罗华元,欧阳迚,等.红花大金元品种的烟叶质量特征及配套栽培技术探讨[J].中国烟草科学,2007,28(5):26-30.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700