反应风格与人格特质的关系
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：The Relationship between Response Style and Personality Traits
- 论文作者：李盟 ; 冯琳琳 ; 孙伟 ; 郭庆科
- 英文论文作者：Li Meng ; Feng Linlin ; Sun Wei ; Guo Qing ke ; School of Psychology ; Shandong Normal University
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：山东师范大学心理学院;
- 论文关键词：反应风格 ; 大五人格 ; 受教育程度 ; 高中生 ; 大学生
- 英文论文关键词：response style ; Big Five Personality ; the level of education ; high school students ; undergraduates
- 会议召开时间：2015-10-16
- 会议录名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议摘要集——心理学与社会发展
- 英文会议录名称：Proceedings of the 18th National Academic Congress of Psychology
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：B848
- 学会代码：ZGXG
- 会议名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议
- 会议地点：中国天津
- 主办单位：中国心理学会
- 学会名称：中国心理学会
- 页数：2
- 文件大小：777k
- 原文格式：D
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
研究者们通常以问卷测验的方式分析被试的某些心理特质及其联系,然而研究者们发现一些与内容无关的因素也会影响被试的选择,例如等级量表中的反应风格。反应风格是指被试基于某些固定的倾向而不是基于具体的测验内容对题目做出选择。传统观点认为反应风格是一种系统的误差,应尽可能的排除掉;而新近的观点却发现反应风格很有可能是一种独特的人格变量,它被看作是个体与他人交流过程中的一种图式,贸然排除反应风格可能会剔除一部分真实的目标变量。鉴于此,本研究在后者的视角下试图检验反应风格的类特质属性以及反应风格的影响因素。本研究采用大五人格问卷(NEO-FFI)以及语义反转的NEO-FFI(即把原量表中正向陈述的题目改为反向陈述,原量表中反向陈述的题目改为正向陈述,选项部分保持与原量表一致)分别对1200名高中生和1200名大学生进行了前后两次施测,时间间隔为1个月。与以往研究不同的是,本研究在人格特征稳定性的基础上对比同一被试两次人格问卷的测量结果,如果被试是基于问卷内容作答那么被试在两次测验中选择的答案应该完全相反;若被试在两次测验中同一对题目上选择了完全相同的答案,我们就认为被试是基于一种特定风格作答的。计算两次测验中同一对题目相同答案的次数为反应风格的指标。结果发现:(1)中国被试的默认肯定反应风格最多,其次是默认否定、折中、极端否定和极端肯定风格,且各种反应风格并不是独立存在的。(2)随着受教育程度的提高,各种反应风格均显著下降。性别在默认肯定风格及折中风格上主效应显著,性别与受教育程度在极端肯定风格以及折中风格上的交互作用显著。具体来说,随受教育程度提高男生极端肯定以及折中风格下降程度要大于女生。(3)各反应风格与人格特质的不同维度均存在不同程度和不同方向的相关,例如反应风格受到神经质的正性影响,责任心与反应风格呈负相关等。
Researchers usually analyze respondents' psychological traits and their associations through the questionnaire test, but researchers have found that a number of factors unrelated to the test content will also affect the choice of respondents, e.g. the response style of rating scale. Response styles refer to respondents' systematic tendency to answer questionnaire items on some basis other than the specific item content. The traditional opinions view response style as a kind of system error, it should be ruled out as much as possible; And the new viewpoints found that the response styles are more likely to be a unique personality variables, it has been seen a schema of individual in the communication with e others, ruling out these response style prematurely may eliminate part of the real target variable. Due to this, the present study is trying to examine the trait-like properties and the effect factors of response styles in the latter perspectives. This research adopts the Big Five Personality questionnaire(NEO-FFI) and semantic reversal of NEO-FFI(i.e. the positive statement-items in the original scale are reserved to negative statements set and the negative statement-items in the original scale are changed to negative, option portion remains consistent with the original scale) measures 1200 high school students and 1200 undergraduates twice one month in between. In contrast to previous research, the present study compared the Personality Questionnaire measurements finding of the same respondents based on the stability of personality traits. If respondents response to the test based on the content, the answer should be chosen exactly the opposite; If respondents chose the same answer on a pair of items in the two tests exactly, we consider respondents answer based on a specific response styles. Calculating the number of the same answer at each pair of items as response styles indicators in two tests. The findings were as follows:(1) The acquiescent response style is more than other response styles in Chinese respondents, then the disacquiescence response style, midpoint response style, positive extreme response style and negative extreme response style. All kinds of response styles are not independent.(2) All response styles were significantly reduced with the higher education. The main effect of gender on the acquiescent response style and midpoint response style were significant, and the interaction effect were significant on midpoint response style and positive extreme response style. Specifically, the males reduced a lot than females on positive extreme response style and midpoint response style along with the level of education.(3) Each response styles were related to personality traits at different degree and direction. e.g. response styles were affected by Neuroticism, the conscientiousness were negatively correlated with response styles, etc.
Researchers usually analyze respondents' psychological traits and their associations through the questionnaire test, but researchers have found that a number of factors unrelated to the test content will also affect the choice of respondents, e.g. the response style of rating scale. Response styles refer to respondents' systematic tendency to answer questionnaire items on some basis other than the specific item content. The traditional opinions view response style as a kind of system error, it should be ruled out as much as possible; And the new viewpoints found that the response styles are more likely to be a unique personality variables, it has been seen a schema of individual in the communication with e others, ruling out these response style prematurely may eliminate part of the real target variable. Due to this, the present study is trying to examine the trait-like properties and the effect factors of response styles in the latter perspectives. This research adopts the Big Five Personality questionnaire(NEO-FFI) and semantic reversal of NEO-FFI(i.e. the positive statement-items in the original scale are reserved to negative statements set and the negative statement-items in the original scale are changed to negative, option portion remains consistent with the original scale) measures 1200 high school students and 1200 undergraduates twice one month in between. In contrast to previous research, the present study compared the Personality Questionnaire measurements finding of the same respondents based on the stability of personality traits. If respondents response to the test based on the content, the answer should be chosen exactly the opposite; If respondents chose the same answer on a pair of items in the two tests exactly, we consider respondents answer based on a specific response styles. Calculating the number of the same answer at each pair of items as response styles indicators in two tests. The findings were as follows:(1) The acquiescent response style is more than other response styles in Chinese respondents, then the disacquiescence response style, midpoint response style, positive extreme response style and negative extreme response style. All kinds of response styles are not independent.(2) All response styles were significantly reduced with the higher education. The main effect of gender on the acquiescent response style and midpoint response style were significant, and the interaction effect were significant on midpoint response style and positive extreme response style. Specifically, the males reduced a lot than females on positive extreme response style and midpoint response style along with the level of education.(3) Each response styles were related to personality traits at different degree and direction. e.g. response styles were affected by Neuroticism, the conscientiousness were negatively correlated with response styles, etc.
引文