权力对惩罚公正的影响:违规者特质信息的作用
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Power and retributive justice:the role of perpetrator's trait information
- 论文作者：齐玲 ; 马红宇 ; 梁娟 ; 杨林川
- 英文论文作者：QI Ling ; MA Hongyu ; LIANG Juan ; YANG Linchuan ; School of Psychology ; Central China Normal University ; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室;华中师范大学心理学院;
- 论文关键词：权力 ; 惩罚公正 ; 特质信息
- 英文论文关键词：power ; retributive justice ; trait information power
- 会议召开时间：2015-10-16
- 会议录名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议摘要集——心理学与社会发展
- 英文会议录名称：Proceedings of the 18th National Academic Congress of Psychology
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：B842
- 学会代码：ZGXG
- 会议名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议
- 会议地点：中国天津
- 主办单位：中国心理学会
- 学会名称：中国心理学会
- 页数：2
- 文件大小：777k
- 原文格式：D
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
近年来研究者关于第三方公正的研究多集中于普通大众对违规者进行惩罚公正判断,惩罚公正是指人们受到不公正对待时通过报复或惩罚违规者来实现公正的方法。但一般来说,对违规者的惩罚主要是由权力持有者所操作执行的。且根据社会判断能力理论,权力持有者对自身拥有的刻板化信息更加自信,当违规者特质与刻板信息一致时,权力持有者更倾向基于违规者消极特质信息进行惩罚公正判断。本研究就是试图探讨作为特殊的第三方‐权力持有者与惩罚公正间的关系,且试图通过违规者的消极特质探讨权力持有者进行惩罚公正判断的心理机制。为此本研究假设权力持有者比无权力者对违规者的惩罚程度更强,且这是因为权力持有者比无权力者更倾向基于违规者的消极特质对违规者进行惩罚公正判断。本研究用两个实验来验证假设。实验1的目的是验证高低权力与惩罚公正间的关系,采用的是情景实验范式,被试为40名大学生,通过任务得分高低来操纵权力高低,研究结果为权力持有者的惩罚(M=5.01,SD=1.02)显著强于无权力持有者的惩罚(M=3.46,SD=0.96),T检验结果为t=4.72,P<.001,表明权力持有者比无权力者对违规者的惩罚程度更强,即权力持有者认为更加严重的惩罚是公正的。研究2拟采用情景实验范式,通过2(权力:高vs低)*2(违规者特质:积极特质vs消极特质)被试间设计,拟选取80名大学生为被试,探讨违规者特质如何影响权力持有者的惩罚公正判断。当前研究尝试探讨权力持有者的惩罚公正判断的心理机制。
In recent years, the researches about the third-party justice has focused on the retributive justice of public, namely the severity of punishment that people consider being fair. But in everyday life, punishment of offenders is typically carried out by power holders. And according to the social judgment theory, power holders have relatively more confidence in the correctness of their stereotypic beliefs and worldviews. where trait information confirms and reinforces existing stereotypes, power holders are likely to punish offenders more severe.This study try to explore the relationship between power holders,special third party and d retributive justice, and try to explore the psychology mechanism of retributive justice of the power holder by offender's negative traits.Therefore the research hypothesis is : participants who were primed with high power recommended more severe punishment than participants who were primed with low power, but only when the offender possessed negative character traits. In this study, two experiments were made to verify the hypothesis. Experiment 1 validated the relationship between power and retributive justice by situational experiment paradigm, 40 students are subjects, the high and low power were manipulated by the task score, the results showed that participants who were primed with high(M=5.01,SD=1.02)recommended more severe punishment than participants who were primed with low power(M=3.46,SD=0.96),the result of T-test is t=4.72,P<.001. Study 2 will use the experimental paradigm, by 2(power: high vs low) * 2(offenders traits: positive traits vs negative traits) between-subjects design, and will select 80 college students as subjects, want to explore how the traits of offenders influence the relationship between power holders and retributive justice. The current research explore the psychological mechanism of power holders by introduce the role of the offender's negative traits.
In recent years, the researches about the third-party justice has focused on the retributive justice of public, namely the severity of punishment that people consider being fair. But in everyday life, punishment of offenders is typically carried out by power holders. And according to the social judgment theory, power holders have relatively more confidence in the correctness of their stereotypic beliefs and worldviews. where trait information confirms and reinforces existing stereotypes, power holders are likely to punish offenders more severe.This study try to explore the relationship between power holders,special third party and d retributive justice, and try to explore the psychology mechanism of retributive justice of the power holder by offender's negative traits.Therefore the research hypothesis is : participants who were primed with high power recommended more severe punishment than participants who were primed with low power, but only when the offender possessed negative character traits. In this study, two experiments were made to verify the hypothesis. Experiment 1 validated the relationship between power and retributive justice by situational experiment paradigm, 40 students are subjects, the high and low power were manipulated by the task score, the results showed that participants who were primed with high(M=5.01,SD=1.02)recommended more severe punishment than participants who were primed with low power(M=3.46,SD=0.96),the result of T-test is t=4.72,P<.001. Study 2 will use the experimental paradigm, by 2(power: high vs low) * 2(offenders traits: positive traits vs negative traits) between-subjects design, and will select 80 college students as subjects, want to explore how the traits of offenders influence the relationship between power holders and retributive justice. The current research explore the psychological mechanism of power holders by introduce the role of the offender's negative traits.
引文