胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗急性心梗并室性心律失常效果探讨
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
目的:探析胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗急性心梗并室性心律失常效果。方法:随机抽取2014年1月一2015年12月时间段内来我院接诊的60例急性心梗并室性心律失常患者,以患者治疗方法为标准进行分组,两组患者均进行常规治疗,其中一组患者给予胺碘酮,另一组患者给予利多卡因,统计分析与观察两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:观察组患者的心律失常控制率是90%,对照组是76.7%,组间比较差异性明显(P<0.05)。观察组患者的心律失常发生率是6.7%,对照组是20%,组间比较差异性显著(P<0.05)。结论:胺碘酮治疗急性心梗并室性心律失常的临床治疗效果明显优于利多卡因,保障患者的生命安全。
Objective:to explore amiodarone and lidocaine treatment effect of acute myocardial infarction(ami) and ventricular arrhythmia.Methods:randomly selected in January 2014- December 2015 period to our hospital departments of 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction(ami) and ventricular arrhythmia,on the basis of treatment in patients with group,two groups of patients with routine therapy,one group patients give amiodarone,another group of patients given lidocaine,statistical analysis and to observe the clinical treatment effect of two groups of patients.Results:the observation group of patients with cardiac arrhythmias control rates were 90%,control group is 76.7%,the difference is compared between group significantly(P < 0.05).Observation group of patients the incidence of arrhythmia was 6.7%,control group is 20%,comparing differences between group significantly(P < 0.05) Conclusion:amiodarone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction(ami) and ventricular arrhythmia treatment effect is significantly better than that of lidocaine,safeguard the life safety of patients..
引文
[1]吴忠,乔平,王圣等.胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗急性心梗并室性心律失常疗效观察[J].中国热带医学,2010,10(9):1133-1133,1161.
    [2]马琴.胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗急性心梗并室性心律失常的临床疗效对比分析[J].中国保健营养(下旬刊),2014,24(4):2216-2217.
    [3]李光春.胺碘酮治疗急性心梗室性心律失常的临床分析[J].中国实用医药,2012,07(31):153-154.
    [4]杭爱荣.浅谈急性心梗并室性心律失常中B~受体阻滞剂的使用[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2010,26(3):66-66.
    [5]胡瑞玲.胺碘酮治疗急性心梗患者并发室性心律失常的疗效观察[J].中国实用医药,2011,06(9):169-170.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700