渣油加氢脱氮催化剂对比研究
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Comparative Study of Residue hydrodenitrogenation Catalysts
- 论文作者：赵博 ; 刘朔 ; 袁瑞 ; 曹东炜 ; 赵瑞玉
- 英文论文作者：Bo Zhao ; Liu ; Yuan ; Cao ; Zhao ; State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing ; Key Laboratory of Catalysis ; CNPC ; China University of Petroleum(Huadong)
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：中国石油大学(华东)重质油国家重点实验室CNPC催化重点实验室;
- 论文关键词：渣油加氢脱氮催化剂 ; 对比表征 ; 酸性
- 会议召开时间：2016-07-01
- 会议录名称：中国化学会第30届学术年会摘要集-第三十二分会： 多孔功能材料
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：TE624.9
- 学会代码：ZGHY
- 会议名称：中国化学会第30届学术年会-第三十二分会 ; 多孔功能材料
- 会议地点：中国辽宁大连
- 主办单位：中国化学会
- 学会名称：中国化学会
- 页数：1
- 文件大小：140k
- 原文格式：D
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
随着原油重质化与轻油需求之间的矛盾逐渐加深,重油轻质化技术得到了广泛应用。其中最主要的是加氢工艺,而催化剂是其中的技术关键,对国内加氢催化剂提出了提高性能、降低成本的要求。本论文研究对比了国内外共五种加氢脱氮催化剂,主要就催化剂孔结构、活性相纳米结构、金属负载量、酸性强弱与酸量、MSI等方面的差异进行表征分析。研究发现五种催化剂在金属负载量、孔结构、MSI和活性组分分布情况等方面的差异较小,主要区别体现在酸强度与酸量,如下表1所示。国外X公司脱氮催化剂总酸量相对国内催化剂偏少,且强酸比例增加,而国外R公司脱氮催化剂表现出了相反的规律。
Five kinds of domestic and foreign hydrodenitrogenation catalysts were studied.These catalysts were characterized by using measurements of BET specific surface area,infrared spectroscopy,temperature programmed desorption of ammonia,high-resolution transmission electron microscopy,scanning electron microscopy and temperature programmed reduction of hydrogen.The rules showed that all the characterization results were similar except the acid amount and acid distribution.The figures were shown in the Table.1.It showed that catalysts from X company had lower acid amount and a higher percentage of strong acid compared with domestic catalysts,while the rules expressed by the catalysts from R company were contrary.
Five kinds of domestic and foreign hydrodenitrogenation catalysts were studied.These catalysts were characterized by using measurements of BET specific surface area,infrared spectroscopy,temperature programmed desorption of ammonia,high-resolution transmission electron microscopy,scanning electron microscopy and temperature programmed reduction of hydrogen.The rules showed that all the characterization results were similar except the acid amount and acid distribution.The figures were shown in the Table.1.It showed that catalysts from X company had lower acid amount and a higher percentage of strong acid compared with domestic catalysts,while the rules expressed by the catalysts from R company were contrary.
引文
[1]Hamid,A.;Sergio,L.;Tiancun,X;Malcolm L.H.Appl.Catal.A:Gen.2007,329:36.
[2]Prins,R.;Zhao,Y.;Sivasankar,N.;Kukula,P.J.Catal.2005,234:509.
[3]Shaofeng,Y.;Changhai,L.;Roel,P.J.Catal.2006,241:465.
[4]Minh-Tuan,N.;Melaz,T.;Gerhard,D.;Fabien,C.Ind.eng.chem.res.2015,54:9278.
[2]Prins,R.;Zhao,Y.;Sivasankar,N.;Kukula,P.J.Catal.2005,234:509.
[3]Shaofeng,Y.;Changhai,L.;Roel,P.J.Catal.2006,241:465.
[4]Minh-Tuan,N.;Melaz,T.;Gerhard,D.;Fabien,C.Ind.eng.chem.res.2015,54:9278.