NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MICROSEISMIC WAVEFIELDS WITH MOMENT-TENSOR SOURCES
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
Background, Motivation and Objective Microseismic monitoring technology has been widely used in many geophysical areas such as oil and gas reservoir monitoring, rock burst monitoring of mines and tunnels, geothermal exploration monitoring and natural microseismicity analysis of geological structure. The source mechanism of microseisms in hydraulic fracturing is the basis to further interpret the growth of fractures and can provide important parameters for discrete fracture network(DFN) modeling and stimulated reservoir volume(SRV) estimation. Forward numerical simulation of various types of microseismic sources can not only help to investigate the wavefield characteristics, but also lay the foundation for source location and source mechanism inversion. Statement of Contribution/Methods Microseismic monitoring is also called passive seismic monitoring, which is similar to earthquake monitoring and the impacts of focal mechanisms should be considered. Meanwhile, microseismic monitoring belongs to seismic exploration technologies and is relative small-scale, so numerical simulations methods, such as finite difference method(FDM) can be used to model microseismic wavefields and records. In this paper, equations of equivalent body forces with stress components and particle velocity components are concluded, and then they are included in the staggered-grid based FDM to represent moment-tensor source formulations. Microseismic wavefields based on three typical moment-tensor sources(include ISO, DC and CLVD source) are simulated and analyzed. Results Microseismic wavefields and records with different moment-tensor sources are simulated by staggered-grid based FDM in this paper. The feasibility and validity of the method are verified by comparing simulated results with far-field analytic solutions under the condition of three-dimensional isotropic homogeneous model. Results of isotropic and transverse isotropic with a vertical axis of symmetry(VTI) models show response characteristics of different microseismic sources, which can offer fundamental guidance and instruction for subsequent microseismic data processing(such as seismic phase identification) and interpretation. Through the forward modeling of microseismic wavefields with the surface star-array monitoring, the feasibility of source mechanism inversion by P-wave polarity for surface monitoring has been primarily demonstrated.Discussion and Conclusions In this paper, although only three typical moment-tensor sources are simulated and discussed, any type of moment-tensor sources can be decomposed into ISO, DC and CLVD components and implemented with equivalent body forces. Following conclusions can be drew from simulated results of different moment-tensor sources in different media:(a) In VTI model, not only P-wave but also S-wave can be excited by ISO source, and the velocity is dependent on propagation directions, which presents the characteristics of anisotropic media.(b) DC source can excite P-wave in both isotropic and anisotropic media, and CLVD source excites much stronger S-wave energy than that of P-wave.(c) When the surface monitoring aperture and azimuth coverage are enough, the P-wave polarity can be used in source mechanism inversion.
Background, Motivation and Objective Microseismic monitoring technology has been widely used in many geophysical areas such as oil and gas reservoir monitoring, rock burst monitoring of mines and tunnels, geothermal exploration monitoring and natural microseismicity analysis of geological structure. The source mechanism of microseisms in hydraulic fracturing is the basis to further interpret the growth of fractures and can provide important parameters for discrete fracture network(DFN) modeling and stimulated reservoir volume(SRV) estimation. Forward numerical simulation of various types of microseismic sources can not only help to investigate the wavefield characteristics, but also lay the foundation for source location and source mechanism inversion. Statement of Contribution/Methods Microseismic monitoring is also called passive seismic monitoring, which is similar to earthquake monitoring and the impacts of focal mechanisms should be considered. Meanwhile, microseismic monitoring belongs to seismic exploration technologies and is relative small-scale, so numerical simulations methods, such as finite difference method(FDM) can be used to model microseismic wavefields and records. In this paper, equations of equivalent body forces with stress components and particle velocity components are concluded, and then they are included in the staggered-grid based FDM to represent moment-tensor source formulations. Microseismic wavefields based on three typical moment-tensor sources(include ISO, DC and CLVD source) are simulated and analyzed. Results Microseismic wavefields and records with different moment-tensor sources are simulated by staggered-grid based FDM in this paper. The feasibility and validity of the method are verified by comparing simulated results with far-field analytic solutions under the condition of three-dimensional isotropic homogeneous model. Results of isotropic and transverse isotropic with a vertical axis of symmetry(VTI) models show response characteristics of different microseismic sources, which can offer fundamental guidance and instruction for subsequent microseismic data processing(such as seismic phase identification) and interpretation. Through the forward modeling of microseismic wavefields with the surface star-array monitoring, the feasibility of source mechanism inversion by P-wave polarity for surface monitoring has been primarily demonstrated.Discussion and Conclusions In this paper, although only three typical moment-tensor sources are simulated and discussed, any type of moment-tensor sources can be decomposed into ISO, DC and CLVD components and implemented with equivalent body forces. Following conclusions can be drew from simulated results of different moment-tensor sources in different media:(a) In VTI model, not only P-wave but also S-wave can be excited by ISO source, and the velocity is dependent on propagation directions, which presents the characteristics of anisotropic media.(b) DC source can excite P-wave in both isotropic and anisotropic media, and CLVD source excites much stronger S-wave energy than that of P-wave.(c) When the surface monitoring aperture and azimuth coverage are enough, the P-wave polarity can be used in source mechanism inversion.
引文

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700