区域科技与社会协调发展评价
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：The Evaluation of Regional Science and Technology and Social Coordinated Development
- 论文作者：贾品荣
- 英文论文作者：JIA Pin-rong ; Beijing Research Center of Science of Science
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：北京科学学研究中心;
- 论文关键词：区域科技 ; 区域社会 ; 协调发展 ; 协调模型
- 英文论文关键词：regional science and technology ; regional society ; coordinated development ; coordination model
- 会议召开时间：2016-11-12
- 会议录名称：第十八届中国管理科学学术年会论文集
- 英文会议录名称：Proceedings of the 18th Chinese Annual Conference on Management Science
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：G322
- 学会代码：ZHYJ
- 会议名称：第十八届中国管理科学学术年会
- 会议地点：中国陕西西安
- 主办单位：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会、西安交通大学、中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院、《中国管理科学》编辑部
- 学会名称：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
- 页数：11
- 文件大小：1436k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
建立区域科技发展指数、区域社会发展指数;在此基础上,建构区域科技与社会协调发展指数模型,对全国科技与社会发展进行了比较分析,并选择北京进行了区域科技与社会协调发展的实证分析。结果显示:北京科技发展指数在全国30个省市区排名第1位。从社会综合发展及其因子变化情况看,生态环境是北京社会发展综合实力的第一因子,这说明北京市目前的社会发展,环境质量对其有着最深远的影响;生活质量是社会发展综合实力的第二因子,这要求政府更为关注民生发展;经济发展是社会发展综合实力的第三因子,政府应更好地协调好经济、社会、生态的关系;社会安定和人口素质是社会发展综合实力的第四、第五因子,注意均衡发展。本文对1996—2013年北京科技与社会发展协调度进行了分析。1996年以来北京市科技与社会发展协调状况总体维持高级协调的状态,科技和社会的发展水平基本以相同的步调增长。但1996—2013年期间,协调度经历了由高级协调向中级协调最后再向高级的发展过程。分析了北京市科技与社会协调发展出现波动的原因,提出促进北京科技与社会协调发展的政策建议。
In this paper,regional science and technology and social cooperative mechanism are analyzed,regional science and technology development index,index of regional development are established.On this basis,a index model considering regional science and technology and social harmonious development is constructed,the analysis and comparison of national science and technology and social development are carried on.Empirical analysis of the coordinated development of regional science and technology and society with Beijing is then conducted.The results show that:Beijing science and technology development index in the country's 30 provinces ranked first.From the comprehensive development of the society and its change factor,ecological environment is the Beijing social development comprehensive strength of the first factor,indicating that Beijing's current social development,the quality of the environment to have the most far-reaching impact(quality of life is the second factor of the comprehensive strength of social development,the government should more pay attention to people's livelihood development;economic development is the third factor of the comprehensive strength of social development,the government should better coordinate the relationship between economic,social,ecological,social stability and the quality of population is the comprehensive strength of social development of the fourth,the fifth factor,pay attention to the balanced development.In this paper,the coordination degree of Beijing science and technology and social development from 1996 to 2013 is analyzed.Since 1996,Beijing City,science and technology and social development of the overall coordination of the status of the overall coordination of the state,science and technology and social development level of the same pace of growth.However,during the period from 1996 to 2013,the coordination degree has experienced the development process from the advanced coordination to the intermediate coordination.The reasons of the fluctuation of the coordinated development between science and technology and society in Beijing are analyzed,and the policy suggestions to promote the harmonious development of Beijing's science and technology and society are put forward.
In this paper,regional science and technology and social cooperative mechanism are analyzed,regional science and technology development index,index of regional development are established.On this basis,a index model considering regional science and technology and social harmonious development is constructed,the analysis and comparison of national science and technology and social development are carried on.Empirical analysis of the coordinated development of regional science and technology and society with Beijing is then conducted.The results show that:Beijing science and technology development index in the country's 30 provinces ranked first.From the comprehensive development of the society and its change factor,ecological environment is the Beijing social development comprehensive strength of the first factor,indicating that Beijing's current social development,the quality of the environment to have the most far-reaching impact(quality of life is the second factor of the comprehensive strength of social development,the government should more pay attention to people's livelihood development;economic development is the third factor of the comprehensive strength of social development,the government should better coordinate the relationship between economic,social,ecological,social stability and the quality of population is the comprehensive strength of social development of the fourth,the fifth factor,pay attention to the balanced development.In this paper,the coordination degree of Beijing science and technology and social development from 1996 to 2013 is analyzed.Since 1996,Beijing City,science and technology and social development of the overall coordination of the status of the overall coordination of the state,science and technology and social development level of the same pace of growth.However,during the period from 1996 to 2013,the coordination degree has experienced the development process from the advanced coordination to the intermediate coordination.The reasons of the fluctuation of the coordinated development between science and technology and society in Beijing are analyzed,and the policy suggestions to promote the harmonious development of Beijing's science and technology and society are put forward.
引文
[1]Godin B.The emergence of S&T indicators;Why did governments supplement statistics with indicators?[J].Research Policy,2003,32(4):679-691.
[2]Ganegodage K R.Rambaldi A N.Rao D S P,et al.A new multidimensional measure of development:The role of technology and institutions[J].Social Indicators Research,2015,1-28.
[3]朱李鸣.区域经济与科技协调发展水平的评价指标体系研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2000,(8):7-9.
[4]张磊.区域创新系统与区域经济发展的协调性及测度研究[D],天津:河北工业大学,2006.
[5]王海鹏.中国科技投入与经济增长的Granger因果分析[J].系统工程,2005,(7):85-88.
[6]李海燕,张淑英.中国科技投入与经济增长的面板数据的实证研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2008,(6):24-25.
[7]张维维.我国经济社会协调发展的动态监测、影喻轨理及实现路径研究[D],杭州:浙江大学,2014.
[8]贾品荣.民生科技:创新模式与评价体系[M],北京:经济科学出版社,2014.
[9]贾品荣.民生科技的政策实施绩效评价[J],中国管理科学,2014,(S1).
[10]杨建仁.区域科技竞争力理论及其在中部六省会城市的实证研究[D],南昌:南昌大学,2011.
[11]董晔,安尼瓦尔·阿木提.区域科技与经济社会发展协调度评价—基于新疆的实证研究[J],经济问题探索,2010,(12):82-88.
[12]柳劲松.民族地区科技投入、技术进步与经济增长的协调性分析——基于广西等4个民族地区面板数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2009,(23):65-68.
[2]Ganegodage K R.Rambaldi A N.Rao D S P,et al.A new multidimensional measure of development:The role of technology and institutions[J].Social Indicators Research,2015,1-28.
[3]朱李鸣.区域经济与科技协调发展水平的评价指标体系研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2000,(8):7-9.
[4]张磊.区域创新系统与区域经济发展的协调性及测度研究[D],天津:河北工业大学,2006.
[5]王海鹏.中国科技投入与经济增长的Granger因果分析[J].系统工程,2005,(7):85-88.
[6]李海燕,张淑英.中国科技投入与经济增长的面板数据的实证研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2008,(6):24-25.
[7]张维维.我国经济社会协调发展的动态监测、影喻轨理及实现路径研究[D],杭州:浙江大学,2014.
[8]贾品荣.民生科技:创新模式与评价体系[M],北京:经济科学出版社,2014.
[9]贾品荣.民生科技的政策实施绩效评价[J],中国管理科学,2014,(S1).
[10]杨建仁.区域科技竞争力理论及其在中部六省会城市的实证研究[D],南昌:南昌大学,2011.
[11]董晔,安尼瓦尔·阿木提.区域科技与经济社会发展协调度评价—基于新疆的实证研究[J],经济问题探索,2010,(12):82-88.
[12]柳劲松.民族地区科技投入、技术进步与经济增长的协调性分析——基于广西等4个民族地区面板数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2009,(23):65-68.