基于熵权TOPSIS法的核电工程建设项目评标研究
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：A study on bidding appraisal in nuclear construction projects based on entropy weight TOPSIS method
- 论文作者：蔡立亚 ; 梁永明
- 英文论文作者：CAI Li-ya ; LIANG Yong-ming ; State Nuclear Power Research Institute ; Beijing
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：国核(北京)科学技术研究院有限公司;
- 论文关键词：核电 ; TOPSIS ; 熵权 ; 工程 ; 评标
- 英文论文关键词：nuclear power ; TOPSIS ; entropy weight ; bidding appraisal
- 会议召开时间：2015-09-21
- 会议录名称：中国核科学技术进展报告（第四卷）——中国核学会2015年学术年会论文集第9册（核技术经济与管理现代化分卷、核电子学与核探测技术分卷、核测试与分析分卷）
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：TM623
- 学会代码：EGVD
- 会议名称：中国核学会2015年学术年会
- 会议地点：中国四川绵阳
- 主办单位：中国核学会
- 学会名称：中国核学会
- 页数：6
- 文件大小：253k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
核电项目具有投资大、技术复杂、建设周期长、安全性要求高等特点。核电项目的自身特点使得招投标活动有别于其他工程,在招标过程中需要考虑的因素也较多,潜在投标人较少,招标活动往往采用邀请招标的方式,相比于公开招标,核电项目竞争程度较低。同时,项目评标时可供选择的专家不多。这些特点使得核电项目在投标、评标、定标过程中的时间管理难度较大。评标是招标中至关重要的环节,它将直接关系到项目投资方对施工企业的选取结果,直接关系到核电项目的工程质量。为在核电项目招标过程中有效降低风险,必须采用科学合理的方法进行评标,评出最优核电施工单位。评标方法是评标工作能否客观、顺利开展的决定性因素。在评标方法中,每一个方案常常需要考虑多个指标,只有在对这些指标进行综合评价后才能做出最优决策。构建核电项目招标活动后评价指标体系的过程中应当充分考虑核电项目的特殊性,通过运用TOPSIS综合评价法的计算原理,选取了选取了报价、工期、安全实绩、企业资质、企业信誉、项目经理等级等指标,建立核电工程项目评标模型,应用于核电建设工程项目投标方案的选优中,针对传统信息系统项目评标中单纯由主观判断确定指标权重方法的不足,本文提出了将主观判断与客观情况相结合、定性定量相结合的熵权法来确定指标的权重系数,进而将TOPSIS法与熵权系数综合集成进行合理方案的评价。将该方法应用于工程建设评标过程实践中,从而使工程项目的评标更加科学、有效。
Nuclear power projects are characterized by high investment,long project cycle and complicated technologies involved.Evaluation method is the decisive factor that whether the objective evaluation work smoothly.In the evaluation method,a number of indicators need to be considered of each project.Only in the comprehensive evaluation way can we make the optimal decision.Based on the research fruits of domestic and foreign researchers as well as the features of nuclear power projects,the authors of this article established an assessment index system for nuclear power projects.In the process of nuclear construction bidding and tendering,the most effective way to eliminate unfair competition is to examine the qualifications of tenders and to evaluate the biddings.Traditional evaluation methods of bidding have the defect of determining the weights,merely according to the subjective judgments of experts or decision makers.In this paper,an entropy-weight-based TOPSIS method is proposed to decide the weights.According to the method,the weight coefficients in TOPSIS method are given by means of entropy coefficient.The method has the advantages of combining experts' subjective opinions with objective situations and the combining quantitative analyses with qualitative analyses.The proposed method is applied to evaluating bidding of nuclear power construction project and numerical illustrations proved the effectiveness of this method.
Nuclear power projects are characterized by high investment,long project cycle and complicated technologies involved.Evaluation method is the decisive factor that whether the objective evaluation work smoothly.In the evaluation method,a number of indicators need to be considered of each project.Only in the comprehensive evaluation way can we make the optimal decision.Based on the research fruits of domestic and foreign researchers as well as the features of nuclear power projects,the authors of this article established an assessment index system for nuclear power projects.In the process of nuclear construction bidding and tendering,the most effective way to eliminate unfair competition is to examine the qualifications of tenders and to evaluate the biddings.Traditional evaluation methods of bidding have the defect of determining the weights,merely according to the subjective judgments of experts or decision makers.In this paper,an entropy-weight-based TOPSIS method is proposed to decide the weights.According to the method,the weight coefficients in TOPSIS method are given by means of entropy coefficient.The method has the advantages of combining experts' subjective opinions with objective situations and the combining quantitative analyses with qualitative analyses.The proposed method is applied to evaluating bidding of nuclear power construction project and numerical illustrations proved the effectiveness of this method.
引文
[1]李芳,张恩瑞.基于熵权的核电项目招标活动后评价研究[J].中小企业管理与科技(下旬刊),2013,(03):169-170.
[2]彭瑞华,金湘.三门核电建设工程项目管理特点[J].核标准计量与质量,2009,(03):24-31.
[3]Benirschka,M,Mintzbery,H.Multiple Attribute Decision-Making[M].America:Prineton Press,2000:16-19.
[4]TingYu,C.The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making[J].Applied Soft Computing,2015,26(0):57-73.
[5]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:91-92.
[6]余雁,梁棵.多指标决策TOPSIS方法的进一步探讨[J].系统工程,2003,(02):98-101.
[7]胡永宏.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1997:30-34.
[8]李灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,(05):217-227.
[2]彭瑞华,金湘.三门核电建设工程项目管理特点[J].核标准计量与质量,2009,(03):24-31.
[3]Benirschka,M,Mintzbery,H.Multiple Attribute Decision-Making[M].America:Prineton Press,2000:16-19.
[4]TingYu,C.The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making[J].Applied Soft Computing,2015,26(0):57-73.
[5]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:91-92.
[6]余雁,梁棵.多指标决策TOPSIS方法的进一步探讨[J].系统工程,2003,(02):98-101.
[7]胡永宏.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1997:30-34.
[8]李灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,(05):217-227.