财政分权视角下的新农村建设公共财政投入研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
按照公共产品的公共性强弱排序,新农村建设中的公共财政投入范围依次可以分为社会事业(主要包括教育、卫生、社会保障、文化等)、农业生产基础(主要包括农业补贴、农业综合开发、农业装备、贫困人口脱贫等)、生产基础设施(主要包括道路、水利、电力通讯设施等)、生活基础设施(主要包括安全饮用水、清洁能源等)等四大类。根据财政分权理论,中央财政应当负担受益范围广的社会性公共产品,地方财政应更多的承担地方性和社区性公共产品的供给。本文据此,以检验经典财政分权理论在我国财政支农领域的适用性为主线,对新农村建设公共财政投入进行了研究。
     首先,本文在对相关研究现状和相关理论基础进行梳理和述评,以及对发达国家财政支持农村发展的经验进行总结的基础上,结合理论模型考察我国新农村建设财政投入现行的分工制度。通过制度分析,发现我国中央政府和地方政府的新农村建设责任划分,是符合效用受益范围差别实行财政支出分工原则的。但是在农业生产基础方面,中央部委之间存在严重的“横向分权”不明的问题。在部分基础设施和社会事业方面,“纵向分权”也存在名义上责任清晰,实际分工不明的问题。这表明完善新农村建设财政投入分工的路径选择应当是通过整合新农村建设各级财政投入资金,合理确定农村公共产品的提供模式。
     其次,本文分别对我国新农村建设中,中央财政和地方财政投入现状进行了研究。研究表明中央财政投入呈现出支持范围不断拓宽、增量改革为主、比例逐渐量化、以项目方式推动资金投放等特点,但由于政府间财权事权的非均衡划分、缺乏有效的政策激励以及支农资金管理体制异常复杂等原因,其支持的范围,特别是支持的力度远远不能与农业、农村发展的实际相适应,存在资金来源渠道多,投入分散、偏重物质资本投资、忽视人力资本投资的问题。资金投入结构有待于进一步优化,使用效率有待于进一步提高。地方财政方面,受深层制度影响,县级财政呈现出“教育财政”的特征,其支持新农村建设的机制尚未形成,存在资金规模不足、结构失衡、缺乏积极性等问题。同时本文还分区域研究了“财力补助型转移支付”和“专项补助转移支付”对地方政府支农投入效应的差异,实证检验了财政分权理论中“粘蝇纸效应”假说。而作为平衡两种转移支付政策取向的产物是支农专项资金整合。
     再次,本文基于我国幅员辽阔,农村区域差异性大的国情,研究了在财政分权政策下不同区域在新农村建设中公共财政投入优先序问题。研究表明今后东部地区新农村建设财政投入的重点是加强规划方面的投入,改善公共性较弱的农民生活基础设施,同时要加强农民的社会保障;中部地区农村劳动力数量过于庞大是最主要的问题,未来财政支持重点是增加农民培训资金投入;西部地区财政支持新农村建设重点在于采取补助财力的转移支付方式;东北地区作为国家的粮食主产区,中央财政支持重点在于更大幅度提高种粮补贴,补偿其保障国家粮食安全而损失的机会收益。
     另外,本文通过典型案例,分析了在财政分权的政策下,县级财政资金的整合问题。案例揭示了建立支农资金整合统筹协调机制,通过以优势产业和重大项目为载体,积极开展整合支农投资实践,有利于资金统筹安排。但目前以县级整合为主的方式,还不足以在更高层次上提升资金投入效率,存在忽视小农户需求等问题。
     最后,本文根据上述研究,提出了优化新农村建设公共财政投入的基本思路和对策:一是明确财政支持新农村建设的目标是让农民分享经济增长成果,中央政府以稳粮增收促民生的全国性公共物品(服务)为主,地方政府以扶持社区建设和农民创业为主;二是要按照效用受益范围差异划分事权,利用各级政府的信息优势明确财政支出责任从而完善新农村建设公共财政投入的分权模式;三是近期优化新农村建设公共财政投入要加强公共财政支农资金预算管理,调整财政投入结构,整合各级财政投入资金,实施财政支持区域差别化政策;四是优化新农村建设公共财政投入,远期需支持制度性建设,发挥规划的引导和统筹作用,形成多元化支持农村建设政策框架体系,科学开展新农村建设公共财政投入绩效评估,坚持新农村建设投融资体系市场化取向。
In accordance with the degree of the public nature of public goods, public financial investment in New Countryside Construction can be divided into four categories:social service (mainly concerned with education, health, social security, culture, etc.), agricultural production basis (mainly concerned with agricultural subsidies, comprehensive development of agriculture, agricultural equipment, and helping the poor eradicate poverty, etc.), production infrastructures (mainly including roads, water conservancy, electrical power and communications facilities, etc.), life infrastructures (mainly including drinking water, clean energy, etc.). According to fiscal decentralization theory, the central government should supply public goods with a wide range of social benefits, while the local government should mainly provide local and community-oriented public goods. Thus, focusing on testing the applicability of the classic fiscal decentralization theory to China's financial support for agriculture, this dissertation does research into the public financial investment in New Countryside construction.
     Firstly, this dissertation surveys and makes comments on the related research status and theory basis. By summarizing the experience of financial support for agriculture in developed countries and combining theoretical models, it explores China's division system of financial investment in New Countryside construction. By analysis of the system, it discovers that the division of responsibilities between China's central government and local governments in New Countryside construction is in line with the principle that division is made in accordance with the range of social benefits. However, in respect of agricultural production basis, there is a serious problem of unclear "horizontal power division" among the central ministries and commissions. Concerning some infrastructures and social service, there is also the problem of seemingly clear but actually unclear "vertical power division". This indicates that the way to perfect the division of responsibility for financial investment in New Countryside construction is to integrate all levels of financial investment funds for New Countryside construction and to reasonably determine the models of supplying rural public goods.
     Secondly, this dissertation does research on the status quo of central and local government investment in New Countryside construction. It shows that the central government financial investment is characterized by increasingly widening scope of support, incremental reform, gradually quantifying proportions, promoting project investment, etc. Due to the unbalanced power division between governments, the shortage of effective incentive policies, and extremely complicated system of management of funds for supporting agriculture, the support scope and strength, in particular, cannot keep pace with the development of agriculture and rural areas whatsoever. Although there are many ways of raising funds, the investment of them is excessively diversifying. In addition, too much emphasis is put on physical capital investment and therefore human capital investment is neglected. Investment structure of funds needs to be epitomized and efficiency in using them also needs to be boosted. In respect of local finance, county finance corresponds to "education finance" because of the influence of the essential system. The mechanism for supporting New Countryside construction has not yet been formed. Problems exist such as insufficient scale of funds, unbalanced structure, lack of enthusiasm, etc. Meanwhile, the dissertation does research on the disparity between "transfer payment of financial subsidies" and "transfer payment of subsidies for special purposes" for the local governments to support agriculture by investment. It has empirically tested the "Flypaper Effect" hypothesis in fiscal decentralization theory. The way to balance the two kinds of transfer payment is to integrate agricultural supporting funds.
     Thirdly, given the vast territory and the wide regional disparity in rural areas, this dissertation has done research on the priority order of public financial investment in New Countryside construction in different regions under the fiscal decentralization policy. It shows that emphasis of financial investment should be placed on planning, improving rural infrastructures of weak public nature and strengthening social securities of farmers in New Countryside construction of eastern China. Due to the excessively large number of rural labor force in central China, the focus of financial support is to increase funds investment in farmer training. In western China, financial support for New Countryside construction should focus on adopting the method of transfer payment of subsidies. In northeastern China, one of the main grain production area of China, the financial support of the central government should focus on increasing grain subsidies on a larger scale and compensate the loss resulted from ensuring the nation's grain security.
     Furthermore, with typical cases the dissertation analyzes the issue of funds integration of county finance under the fiscal decentralization policy. The cases indicate that it is good for overall funds arrangement that building overall coordination mechanism for the integration of agricultural supporting funds and actively doing practice of integrating agricultural supporting funds in advantageous industries and key projects. Neveitheless, the present county integration serving as the major method which neglects the demand of small rural households is not good enough to boost the efficiency of funds investment.
     Finally, based on the above research, the dissertation puts forward some general ideas and strategies of constructing the New Countryside via optimizing the public financial investment. First, set clear targets of financial support for New Countryside construction. The central government should focus on developing national public properties (services) by way of steadily increasing grain production and promoting people's livelihood, while the local government should concern more about supporting the community construction and farmer business initiations; second, perfect decentralized model of constructing the New Countryside with the public financial investment, and define scope of investment via the New Countryside construction supported by the public financial. As benefit from the different scopes of the effectiveness divide affairs and powers, and utilize the informational advantages of each rank of government to make sure the responsibilities of financial expenditure; third, in recent time, optimize the New Countryside construction in which public financial investment should play a leading and coordinating role, strengthen the budget management of the public finance earmarked to agriculture, adjust the pattern of public financial investment & expense in New Countryside construction, and implement policies of regional differentiation in financial-aiding; forth, optimize public financial investment in New Countryside construction, give support to institutional construction in the long run, form a system of framework of diversified policies to back up construction in rural areas, develop a scientific evaluation on how public financial investment performs in New Countryside construction, and uphold the market-oriented investment & financial system in New Countryside construction.
引文
[1]张晓山.关于社会主义新农村建设几个理论与实践问题的初步探索[J].调研世界,2006,(9):3-6.
    [2]P.GPardey, J.Roseboom and N.M.Beintema. Investments in African agricultural research[J]. World Development,1997,25(3):409-423.
    [3]E.A.Nicolini. Mortality, interest rates, investment, and agricultural production in 18th century England[J]. Explorations in Economic History,2004, 41:130-155.
    [4]M.W.rosegrant, F.Kasryno and N.D.Perez. Output response to prices and public investment in agriculture:Indonesian food crops[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1998,55:333-352.
    [5]T.Reardon,V.Kelly, E.Crawford et at. Promoting sustainable intensification and productivity growth in Sahel agriculture after macroeconomic policy reform[J]. Food Policy,1997,22(4):317-327.
    [6]K.K.Datta, C. de Jong and O.P.singh. Reclaiming salt-affected land through drainage in Haryana, India:a financial analysis[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2000,46:55-71.
    [7]K.Macintyre and D.R.Hotchkiss. Referral revisited:community financing schemes and emergency transport in rural Africa[J]. Social Science & Medicine,1999,49:1473-1487.
    [8]K.Deininger and S.Jin. Tenure security and land-related investment:Evidence from Ethiopia[J]. European Economic Review.2006,50:1245-1277.
    [9]W.chmielewska and D.Baker. The Polish agricultural marketing system:a policy perspective on developments[J]. Food Policy,1995,20(1):51-57.
    [10]J.M.Baland and A.Kotwal. The political economy of underinvestment in agriculture[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1998,55:233-247.
    [11]S.A.Block. The recovery of agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Food Policy,20(5):385-405.
    [12]F.Place, M.Adato and P.Hebinck. Understanding rural poverty and investment in agriculture:a assessment of integrated quantitative and qualitative research in Western Kenya[J]. World Development,2006, doi:10.1016/j. worlddev. 2006.10.005
    [13]F.Ellis and GBahiigwa. Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Uganda[J].
    World Development,2003,31(6):997-1013.
    [14]A.Kuyvenhoven. Creating an enabling environment:policy conditions for less-favored areas[J]. Food Policy,2004,29:407-429.
    [15]S.G.Fan and C.Chan-Kang. Returns to investment in less-favored areas in developing countries:a synthesis of evidence and implications for Africa[J]. Food Policy,2004,29:431-444.
    [16]P.C.Chen, M.M.Yu,C.C.Chang, et al. Total factor productivity growth in China's agricultural sector[J]. China Economic Review,2008,19:580-593.
    [17]S.G.Fan. Production and productivity growth in Chinese agriculture:new measurement and evidence[J]. Food Policy,1997,22(3):213-228.
    [18]S.Rozelle, A.Park, V.Benziger, et al. Targeted poverty investments and economic growth in China[J]. World Development,1998,26(12):2137-2151.
    [19]S.G.Fan, C.Fang and X.B.Zhang. Agricultural research and urban poverty:the case of China[J]. World Development,2003,31(4):733-741.
    [20]S.G. Fan. Research Investment and the economic returns to Chinese agricultural research[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2000,14:163-182.
    [21]W.N.Mao and W.W.Koo. Productivity growth, technological progress, and efficiency change in Chinese agriculture after rural economic reforms:a dea approach. China Economic Reviwe[J],1997,8(2):157-174.
    [22]S.Rozelle and M.W.Rosegrant. China's past, present, and future food economy: can China continue to meet the challenges? [J]. Food Policy,1997, 22(3):191-200.
    [23]N.Heerink, X.B.Bao, R.Li, et al. Soil and water conservation investments and rural development in China[J]. China Economic Review,2009, doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2009.01.001
    [24]J.J.Heckman. China's human capital investment[J]. China Economic Review, 2005,16:50-70.
    [25]温铁军.中国“三农”:值得深思的三大问题[J].学习月刊,2005,(3):23-25.
    [26]李剑阁主编:中国新农村建设调查,上海远东出版社,2007年
    [27]王国平.环境保护与中国农村社区机制的选择[J].求索,2004,(4):7-11
    [28]潘岳.环境保护与社会公平.环境教育[J],2005,(4)::4-8
    [29]余艳琴、黄尚海.关于农村义务教育师资问题的实证研究[J].教育理论与实践,2005,25(9):27-29.
    [30]李祖平.经济结构转型进程中农村新型社会保障制度探析[J].农村经济,
    2006,(4):87-89.
    [31]李炳坤.关于统筹城乡发展的几点思考[J].中国发展观察,2007,(12):26-28.
    [32]韩俊.城乡一体化新格局还有多远[J].人民论坛,2008,(1):22-23.
    [33]丁学东,张岩松.公共财政覆盖农村的理论和实践[J],管理世界,2007,(10):1-50.
    [34]马晓河.建设社会主义新农村需要把握的几个重大问题[J].中国经贸导刊,2006,(11):23-26.
    [35]王世敏.城郊新农村建设的特色模式选择[J].青岛行政学院学报,2006,(1):35-37.
    [36]赵树凯.政府治理是新农村建设的关键[J].中国发展观察,2006,(6):29-31.
    [37]罗来武.从“机构观”到“功能观”:中国农村金融制度创新的路径选择[J].中国农村经济,2004,(8):20-25.
    [38]中国社会科学院农村发展研究所,国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.2005-2006年:中国农村经济形势分析与预测.社会科学文献出版社,2006.
    [39]柯炳生.农业发展面临资金短缺困境.中国经济时报,2003-11-24.
    [40]苏明.财政体制改革对农业和农村经济的影响及对策[J].管理世界,1995,(2):153-162.
    [41]张晓山,崔红志.“三农”问题根在扭曲的国民收入分配格局[J],中国改革,2001,(8):9-11.
    [42]陈锡文主编. 中国农村公共财政制度:理论·政策·实证研究,中国发展出版社,2005年
    [43]胡鞍钢,魏星.财政发展与建设社会主义新农村:挑战与策略[J].财经问题研究,2007,(5):3-9.
    [44]Huther. J, Shah. Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate Decentralization. World Bank, Washington, DC,1998.
    [45]Tanzi. On Fiscal Federalism:Issues on Worry about [Z]. Woking Paper,2000.
    [46]Arikan. G. Fiscal Decentralization s A Remedy for Corruption [J]. International Tax and Public Finance,2004,(11)
    [47]Qian,Y.and G.,Roland, Federalism and the Soft Budget Constrain[J]. American Economic Review,1998 (88):1143-1162.
    [48]姚洋,杨雷.制度供给失衡和中国财政分权的后果[J].战略与管理,2003,(3):27-33.
    [49]Fornasari. F., Webb S. B, Zou. The Macroeconomic Import of Decentralized Spending and Deficits. International Evidence[J]. Annals of Finacne and
    Economics,2000:430-433.
    [50]Zhou Huizhong. Fiscal Decentralization and Development of the Tabacco Industry in China[J]. China Economic Review,2000, (11).
    [51]严冀,陆铭.分权与区域经济发展:面向一个最优分权程度的理论[J].世界经济文汇,2003,(3):55-66.
    [52]杨灿明.地方政府行为与区域市场结构[J].经济研究,2000,(11):58-64.
    [53]乔宝云,范剑勇,彭骥鸣.政府间转移支付与地方财政努力[J].管理世界,2006,(3):50-56.
    [54]Jin,H., Y.Qian and B.Weingast. Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2005,89: 1719-1742.
    [55]邹继础. 中国财政制度改革之探索[M].北京:人民出版社,2000
    [56]王绍光.分权的底线[J].战略与管理,1995,(2):37-56.
    [57]张秀生,柳芳,王军民.农民收入增长:基于农村公共产品供给视角的分析[J].经济评论,2007,(3):48-55.
    [58]叶子荣,刘鸿渊.农村公共产品供给制度:历史、现状与重构[J].学术研究,2005,(1):57-62.
    [59]马晓河、方松海.我国农村公共品的供给现状、问题与对策[J].农业经济问题,2005,(4):22-29.
    [60]何精华,岳海鹰,杨瑞梅.农村公共服务满意度及其差距的实证分析——以长江三角洲为案例[J].中国行政管理,2006,(5):91-95
    [61]孔祥智,李圣军,马九杰等.农村公共产品供给现状及农户支付意愿研究[J].中州学刊,2006,(4):54-58.
    [62]岳书铭,綦好东,杨学成等.基于农户意愿的农村公共品融资问题分析[J].中国农村经济,2005,(11):47-52.
    [63]张林秀,李强,罗仁福等.中国农村公共物品投资情况及区域分布[J].中国农村经济,2005,(11):18-25.
    [64]赵宇,姜海臣.基于农民视角的主要农村公共品供给情况——以山东省11个县(市)的32个行政村为例[J].中国农村经济,2007,(5):52-62.
    [65]刘义强.建构农民需求导向的公共产品供给制度——基于一项全国农村公共产品需求问卷调查的分析[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,45(2):15-23.
    [66]林万龙.乡村社区公共产品的制度外筹资[J].中国农村经济,2002,(7):28-35.
    [67]叶敬忠.新农村建设中的九个问题亟待关注.新华网,2006-12-7.
    [68]A.Samuelson. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1954,36:387-389.
    [69]J.A.Buchanan, An Economic Theory of Clubs, Economics 32,1965,PP.1-14.
    [70]陈共,《财政学》第四版,中国人民大学出版社,2002年8月
    [71]Buchanan M.James. Federalism and Fiscal Equity [J].American Economic Review,1950,40(4):583-599.
    [72]陈昌盛,蔡跃洲编著.中国政府公共服务:体制变迁与地区综合评估[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007
    [73]张恒龙,陈宪.政府间转移支付对地方财政努力程度财政均等化的影响[J].北京:经济科学2007(1),15-23
    [74]Myrdal G. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London:Gerald Duckworth,1957
    [75]Hirschman, A. O. Strategy of Economic Development [M]. Yale University Press,1958
    [76]Grewal,B.S., G..H.Brennan, and R.L.Mathews(eds.). The Economics of Federalism, National Universtiy Press,1980.
    [77]Oates,Wallace.E. The Theory of Public Finance in A Federal System [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,1968, (1):37-54.
    [78]Oates,W. "An Essay on Fiscal Federalism",J ournal of Economic Literat ure[J],1999,37(3),1120-1149.
    [79]W.E.Oates, Fiscal Federalism, New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1972
    [80]C.Tiebout, A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, Journal of Political Economy[J],1956,64:416-424.
    [81]R.A.Musgrave, The Theory of Public Finance, New York:McRaw-Hill,1959.
    [82]Buchanan, James M., and Geoffrey Brennan. The Power to Tax, New York: Cambridge University Press,1980
    [83]G.Montinola, Y.Qian and B.R.Weingast, Federalism, Chinese Style-the Political Basis for Economic Success in China[J].World Politics,1995,48(1).
    [84]Mckinnon, Ronald I. "Market-preserving Fiscal Federalism in the American Monetary Union", in Mario Blejer and Teresa Ter-Minassian eds., Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance:Essays in Honor of Vito Tanzi, London:Routledge,1997, pp.73-93.
    [85]Qian,Y.,and B.,Weingast. Federalism as a commitment to preserving market
    incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives [J],1997,(11),pp.83-92.
    [86]钱颖一.现代经济学在美国[J].财经问题研究,2003,(1):3-11.
    [87]Qian, Y. and Weingast B.R. China's Transition to Market-Preserving Federalism, Chinese Style [J]. Journal of Policy Reform,1996,1(2):149-186.
    [88]Blanchard,O.,and A.Shleifer. Federalism with and without Political Centralization:China versus Russia. MIT Working Paper 00215,2000.
    [89]Zhuravskaya,E.V. Incentives to Provide Local Public Goods:Fiscal Federalism, Russian Style[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2000,76:337-68.
    [90]李果仁.国外公共财政支出向“三农”倾斜的经验及启示[J].农村财政与财务,2007(5):45-48.
    [91]洪民荣.美国农场家庭收入:经验、问题与政策[J].中国农村经济,2005,(8):73-80.
    [92]苏明,王小林,陈冠群.国外公共财政支持农业和农村发展的主要途径及启示[J].经济研究参考,2007,(24):4-11.
    [93]李燕凌,曾福生,匡远配.农村公共品供给管理国际经验借鉴[J].世界农业,2007,(9):19-22.
    [94]贺达水.欧盟与美国兴农宏观政策的经验与启示[J].中国党政干部论坛,2006,(4):44-46.
    [95]戴蓬军,沈屏.欧盟农村发展的目标、措施和资金[J].农村经济,2002,(6):45.
    [96]李锋传.日本建设新农村经验及对我国的启示[J]. 中国国情国力,2006,(4):10-14.
    [97]林智坦.韩国农村社区经济社会发展考察报告[J].发展研究,1996,(7):44-47.
    [98]李水山. 韩国政府扶持农业和农村社会发展的制度创新[J],高等农业教育,2007,(2):3-6.
    [99]华兴顺.建设新农村中的财政投入机制研究—基于中央和地方政府的博弈分析[J].新西部,2008,(4):62-63.
    [100]柯炳生.财政支农资金虽不断增加但柯炳生发现占财政支出比重却呈下降趋势[J].领导决策信息,2008,(29):12
    [101]李放,朱靖娟.试论我国财政支农支出口径的调整[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007,7(3):18-26.
    [102]张俊伟.支持新农村建设的财政政策选择[J].经济研究参考,2006,(68):19-37.
    [103]新华社.关于2007年中央和地方预算执行情况与2008年中央和地方预算 草案的报告(摘要).新华网,2008-3-6.
    [104]审计署.50个县财政支农资金审计调查结果[J].中国审计,2004,(18):32-33.
    [105]杨颂国.财政支农资金整合探讨[J].邵阳学院学报(社会科学版),2006,5(6):45-46.
    [106]张维萍,张晓明.财政支农资金亟待深度整合[J].农业经济,2006,(6):68-69.
    [107]周克军,李东升.整合支农资金促进社会主义新农村建设[J].农村财政与财务,2006,(10):23-24.
    [108]陈秀荣.关于整合财政支农资金的探讨[J].现代农业,2006,(12):52-53.
    [109]闫杰.整合政府支农投资的难点探析[J].地方财政研究,2006,(9):37-39.
    [110]丁守生.支农资金整合面临的主要问题及对策[J].决策与信息,2006,(9):64-65.
    [111]审计署.审计署财政审计司负责人就中央支农专项资金审计调查结果答记者问.中央政府门户网站,2008-7-25
    [112]朱信凯,马九杰.关于农业投资管理体制改革的思考[J].中州学刊,2008,(2)
    [113]谷有利.财政支农资金拨付渠道问题及整合路径研究[J].农业经济,2008,(5): 91-92.
    [114]黄中文.中国财政分权体制的问题和原因探析[J]. 学术论坛,2005,(12):98-102.
    [115]钟晓敏.市场化改革中的地方财政竞争[J].财经研究,2004,(1):21-30.
    [116]楼继伟.深化财税体制改革完善公共财政体制[J].中国投资,2005,(8):29.
    [117]谢子远.中国财政支出结构存在的问题及改革取向[J].浙江万里学院学报,2005,(4):150-153.
    [118]余珊,丁忠民. ”粘蝇纸效应”在我国政府间财政转移支付中的实证研究——基于一般性转移支付资金的研究[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2008 25(3):61-64.
    [119]Oates,Wallace E.,1994,"Federalism and Government Finance",in Modern Public Finance.J.Quigley and E.Smolen-sky,eds. Cambridge,MA:Harvard U.Press,pp.126-51.
    [120]Stine,William F., "Is Local Government RevenueResponse to Federal Aid Symmetrical?" [J],Nat.Tax J.,1994,47,pp.799-816.
    [121]杨能良.从粘蝇纸效应看我国财政转移支付制度的若干问题[J].四川财政,2002,(11):14-16.
    [122]Inman, R.P.,"Federal Assistance and Local Services in the United States:The
    Evolution of a New Federalist Fiscal Order", Fiscal Federalism:Quantitative Studies, Edited by Rosen, H.S., Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1988,pp.33-77.
    [123]王韬,董安民,张进华.地方财政支持新农村建设的范围及机制创新研究[J].新疆农垦经济,2008,(4):35-38.
    [124]贺煜光,尹孝凡.地方财政支农资金投入结构的未来走向[J].农村财政与财务,2004,(4):28-29.
    [125]刘惠林.构建我国农村教育财政体制的思考[J]. 教育探索,2006,(12):54-55.
    [126]谭春芳,李继宏.农村义务教育财政体制存在的问题[J]. 教育与经济,2003,(3):64.
    [127]刘惠林. 中国农村教育财政问题研究:[博士学位论文].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2007
    [128]李春,彭国甫.当前我国县乡财政问题的体制成因及治理对策[J].当代经济管理,2005,27(4):84-89.
    [129]于永臻.消除新农村建设资金困境探讨[J].青海社会科学,2006,(5):22-25.
    [130]黄冠豪.我国“三农”问题解决之前的乡镇财政危机分析[J]. 商丘师范学院学报.2006,22(6):123-124.
    [131]孙少茹,郑少锋,石峰.财政支农资金投入结构合理性选择分析[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(7):1491-1493.
    [132]杨聪杰.论协调区域发展的财政转移支付制度创新[J].新疆财经,2006,(1):37-40.
    [133]张敖春.促进区域经济发展的财政政策选择[J].合作经济与科技,2008,(3):112-123.
    [134]娜仁图雅.论财政政策与区域协调发展[J].北方经济,2005,(11):69-70.
    [135]刘溶沧,夏杰长.论促进地区经济协调发展的财政政策[J].财贸经济,1998,(4):22-30.
    [136]李娟. 区域协调发展中的财政制度安排[J]. 商丘师范学院学报,2003,19(6): 81-85.
    [137]张义春.我国区域农业发展模式的构想[J].北方经贸,2004,(10):107-108.
    [138]崔和瑞,王伟,赵黎明.区域农业可持续发展系统分析及实现模式[J].国土与自然资源研究,2004,(1):16-17.
    [139]韦文珊.区域农业比较优势评价方法综述[J];中国农业资源与区划,2003,(1):20-24
    [140]段豫川.区域农业可持续发展面临的两个战略问题[J].重庆社会科学,1998,(1):36-38
    [141]任保平,钞小静.工业反哺农业、城市带动乡村:长江三角洲地区的经验及其对西部的启示[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,36(2):11-18.
    [142]黄守宏.区域农业发展的主导产品和支柱产业(上)[J].调研世界,2000,(9):18.
    [143]黄守宏.区域农业发展的主导产品和支柱产业(下)[J].调研世界,2000,(10):7.
    [144]陈印军,杨瑞珍.我国区域农业发展方向与重点[J].中国农业信息,2003,(9):8.
    [145]朱孔山.农业国际化与我国区域农业的发展[J].临沂师范学院学报,2004,(2):93-96.
    [146]赵柏林.WTO条件下区域农业发展对策研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2002,(1):46-48.
    [147]彭克强.基于财政支农资金整合的理性反思[J].调研世界,2008,(2):7-9.
    [148]刘光明,宋洪远.外出劳动力回乡创业:特征、动因及其影响—对安徽、四川两省四县71位回乡创业者的案例分析[J].中国农村经济,2002,(3):65-71.
    [149]陈剑波.县域财产制度与银行信用[J].中国农村信用合作,2007,(2):32-33.
    [150]王韬,董安民,张进华.新农村建设中地方财政支持资金困境探讨—以河南为分析对象[J].中州学刊,2008,(3):51-53.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700