我国装备制造业技术创新路径优化研究
|
摘要
大量理论和实证研究成果均表明,技术在决定生产率差异、国家竞争力差异方面起到了关键性的作用。装备制造业作为为国民经济各行业提供技术装备的战略性产业,其对于国家竞争力的重要性已经形成广泛共识,而装备制造业竞争力提升的关键在于技术创新能力提升。我国装备制造业与发达工业化国家相比明显特征就是“大而不强”,当前我国已经进入重化工业化加速发展阶段,新型工业化和增长方式转变需要以大量先进技术装备为支撑,因此促进装备制造业技术创新能力升级成为当务之急。本文在分析我国装备制造业技术创新路径及其绩效的基础上,对如何优化技术创新路径进行系统研究,以期对促进我国装备制造业技术创新能力提升和产业升级起到理论推进和实践指导作用。
本文主要研究了以下内容：
第一章是绪论,阐释了论文的选题背景和研究意义,对相关文献进行了综述和评析,介绍了全文的结构安排、研究方法和主要创新之处。
第二章是技术后进下的最优技术创新路径分析。首先,阐释了技术创新及其实现路径。由于企业和产业组织形式决定了产业技术环境和企业竞争战略,从而决定企业技术创新的战略重点以及所采取技术创新模式,最终决定了技术创新绩效,因此本文将技术创新路径界定为由产业组织创新影响企业竞争战略,进而决定企业技术创新模式,最终决定技术创新绩效的整个过程。然后,针对技术创新路径方面的不同观点进行分析,得出利用国际技术扩散与自主研发二者对我国装备制造业发展都具有不可忽视的重要性。在此基础上,运用经济理论和经验证据分析自主研发与吸收国际技术扩散的互补性以及研发比较优势的内生性,进而得出了最优技术创新路径应该具备的基本特征：①在技术创新模式上以中高层次的技术引进消化吸收再创新和集成创新为主,实现外部技术资源与内部研发的协同作用；②在技术创新资源配置上以高研发投入和高消化吸收投入为特征；③在内部研发与外部技术利用的相互作用方面,应该表现为外部技术利用与内部研发相互支撑和相互促进的特征。④在技术进步效应方面,应该与世界先进装备制造业技术水平呈现收敛趋势。
第三章是我国装备制造业技术创新路径及其绩效分析。首先,阐述并分析了我国装备制造业技术创新路径演进过程及其基本特征,表明我国装备制造业与日韩产业技术创新路径的明显区别就是自主研发和消化吸收再创新经费投入严重不足,总体上表现为以低水平复制制造能力为主的低层次技术引进消化吸收再创新。然后,运用面板数据计量经济模型对我国装备制造业技术创新路径绩效进行实证分析,结果表明我国装备制造业未能实现吸收利用国际技术扩散与自主研发的相互促进,中高层次消化吸收再创新能力和集成创新能力明显不足。接着,从定性和定量两个方面分行业分析了我国装备制造业与国际先进水平的差距,结果表明我国装备制造业虽然在总量规模水平方面与世界先进水平的差距显著缩小,但是在人均劳动生产率和综合技术水平(全要素生产率)方面差距均没有明显减小,我国装备制造业技术水平仍远远落后于世界装备制造业强国美国,技术落后局面并未得到显著改善。本章研究结论是：由于我国装备制造业遵循的技术创新路径在技术创新模式和资源配置偏离了最优路径,从而导致未能形成外部技术利用与内部研发相互支撑和相互促进的良性循环,最终导致技术进步效应低下,未能缩小与先进装备制造业的技术差距。
第四章是我国装备制造业技术创新偏离最优路径的制约因素分析。首先从理论上对我国装备制造业自主创新动力机制缺失原因进行分析,然后运用pool数据计量模型进行实证分析,结果表明,研发创新活动的高外部性及高风险性、企业规模、公司治理水平、人力资本结构、市场需求、产业技术环境是影响企业自主研发动力的主要因素。最后基于分析结果提出了产业组织优化的基本方向。其一,促进产业集中度和企业规模水平的优化升级,提升技术创新投入能力和技术创新产品获利能力,从而提高研发创新能力。其二,优化微观企业组织结构,促进企业战略目标由追逐短期经济利益向深化科技能力和创造可持续性竞争优势回归,实现企业资源传承利用与技术创新的有效结合。其三,建立完善产业技术创新网络系统,整合产业科技资源,推进技术创新中的专业化分工与相互协作,俘获知识生产的规模收益递增效应。
第五章是产业集中度与研发密度的内生性协同升级机制研究。产业集中度升级和研发密度升级是促进装备制造业技术创新路径优化的关键因素,本章创新性地研究了我国装备制造业的内生性升级机制。首先运用Sutton的内生性产业升级理论阐释装备制造业产业集中度和研发投入密度升级的机制；然后以电子通讯设备制造业和电气设备制造业为例介绍了发达工业化国家装备制造业高集中度化和高研发密度化的升级过程；最后分析了我国装备制造业的产业集中度现状水平和产业升级面临的市场契机,并根据技术落后的具体情况,对经典的产业升级机制进行改进,创新性地提出我国装备制造业产业升级的路径和相应的促进措施。
第六章是我国装备制造业技术创新二元网络构建。装备制造业的系统性复杂性使得技术创新所需要的资源对于单个组织来说不可能完全具备,构建研发创新网络对于集成创新资源,降低风险和外部性从而优化技术创新路径至关重要。本章首先分析了研发网络的基本内涵以及形成条件和过程,研发网络的管理机制；然后运用规范分析和案例分析研究二元网络组织对于提升技术创新能力的关键性作用以及二元网络的结构和机理；最后研究了我国装备制造业研发创新网络的构建,提出复合型二元网络的构建方案。
第七章是我国装备制造业企业组织结构优化。企业作为技术创新的主体,其组织结构优化是技术创新路径优化的根本条件。本章首先分析了公司治理影响装备制造业升级的机制以及我国装备制造业升级的公司治理瓶颈,并提出了相应的改进措施；然后基于资源基础理论和动态能力理论创新性地提出了以资源传承和有效利用为基础的传承性创新方式,论证了传承性创新是实现企业资源积累、利用与竞争优势创造相互协同的最优选择,并基于经验研究给出了管理传承性创新的组织设计模式。
第八章是研究结论与启示。总结全文得出如下结论与启示：最优技术创新路径应该实现国际技术利用与自主研发相互促进；我国装备制造业偏离最优技术创新路径导致技术进步效应低下；技术创新路径优化的本质在于产业组织优化；有效的政策支持对于我国装备制造业升级至关重要。
Many theoretical and empirical research findings have revealed that technology is a key element in determining productivity and national competitiveness. As a strategic industry providing technical equipments for other industries of national economy, the importance of Equipment Manufacturing Industry for national competitiveness has been widely recognized while the competitiveness escalation of Equipment Manufacturing Industry is largely determined by its technological innovation capability. A distinctive feature of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry is "large but not powerful" compared with advanced Equipment Manufacturing Industry. At present, heavy industry in our country is getting into the accelerated development period, new-type industrialization and transformation of economic growth pattern need a large amount of advanced technical equipment to be supported. Thus the technological innovation capability escalation for Equipment Manufacturing Industry is of great urgency. This paper analyzed the technological innovation path and performance of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and did a systematic study on how to optimize the path of technological innovation. The purpose of this study is to push theoretical and practical research to promote the technological innovation capability of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry.
The main content of this paper is summarized in following:
The first chapter is introduction. I expound the background and meaning of this study. Then I do a literature review, and introduce the structure, method and innovation of this paper.
The second chapter analyzed the optimal technological innovation path on condition that the technology is lagging behind. In the first technological innovation and its realization path is explained. Because the organization of enterprise and industry determines the technological envirment of the indusry and firm's competitive strategy, thereby it determines firm's strategic emphasis and mode of technological innovation, and it finally determines the performance of technological innovation. Therefore this paper defines technological innovation path as the entire process in which industrial organizational innovation influences firm's competitive strategy and thereby influnces mode of technological innovation and finally determines the performance of technological innovation. Then I make an analysis on different viewpoint about technological innovation path and draw a conclusion that exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D are all of nonnegligible importance. Based on the foregoing analysis, I analyzed the complementarity between exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D as well as the endogeneity of R&D comparative advantage using economic theory and empirical evidences, consequently the essential feature of optimal technological innovation path is put forward. It includes:①the modes of technological innovation shoud mainly take the form of middle to high-level digestive absorption innovation and integrative innovation to synergize external technology resources and internal R&D;②the allocation of technological innovation resouces should manifest high R&D intensity and high level digestive absorption investment;③exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D should mutually support and promote;④the technological progress should have a tendency of convergence to the technological level of world advanced Equipment Manufacturing Industry.
The third chapter analyzed the technological innovation path and its performance of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. In the first, I expound and analyzed the evolvement process and essential features of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Compared with Japan and South Koreathe distinguished feature of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry is that self R&D and digestive absorption innovation are both severely undercapitalized and the emphasis is put on copying foreign manufacturing capacity at a low level. Then I make an empirical analysis on the performance of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry using panal data econometric model. The result of the econometric analysis revealed that the capability of middle to high-level digestive absorption innovation and integrative innovation is of significant deficiency and failed to realize mutual promotion between exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D. Next the disparity between China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and world advanced level is analyzed from qualitative and quantitative aspects. The result is that although the scale gap between China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and world advanced level is significantly reduced, but the per capita productivity and Total Factor Productivity is far behind the world advanced level and the gap did not become narrower. The situation of technological lagging behind of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry has not been improved. The conclusion of this chapter is that because the technological innovation mode of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry deviated from the optimal path, thereby it is unable to generate mutual promotion between exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D, consequently it resulted in poor technological progress effect and the unnarrowed technological gap.
In chapter four, I analyzed the constraints which cause the deviation of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry from the optimal path. Firstly I theretically analyzed the causes of self R&D shortage of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry, next the econometrical analysis is made by a pool data model. The conclusion is that high externality and high-risk, enterprise scale, corporate governance, human capital strcture, and industrial technological environment are key factors influencing firm's self R&D motive. Finally the fundamental direction for optimization is put forward based on the forgoing analysis. It included:①to facilitate escalation of industrial concentration and firm scale thereby to promote investment capabiity and profitability of technological innovation;②to optimize firm organization at micro level thereby to enable firm to shift its strategy from pursuing short term economic interest to sustainable competitive advantage creation and also to realize effective combination between firm resources inheritance and technological innovation;③to establish industrial technological innovation network system thereby to integrate technological resources and promote specialization and cooperation of technological innovation and consequently to realize the great scale economy effect of knowledge production.
In chapter five, I studied the endogenous synergetic escalation mechanism of industrial concentration and R&D intensity. The escalation of industrial concentration and R&D intensity is of essential importance to technological innovation path optimization. I creatively studied the endogenous escalation mechanism of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Firstly I use Sutton's endogenous escaltion theory to expound the endogenous escalation mechanism of of industrial concentration and R&D intensity. Next the escalation process of the Equipment Manufacturing Industry of industrialized countries is analyzed. Finally I studied the concentration level and market opportunity for China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry, and made an improvement on the classical escalation theory to put forward the boosting measures for the escalation of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry according to its technological lagging situation.
In chapter six, I have done a study on how to build the dualistic technological innovation network of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. System complexity of Equipment Manufacturing Industry makes it impossible for one organization to possess all needed resources for technological innovation. To build technological innovation network is of vital importance to the integration of technological innovation resources and thereby to the technological innovation path optimization. This chapter firstly analyzed the basic connotation of R&D network as well as the formation condition, formation process and governance mechanism of R&D network. Next normative analysis and case analysis were made to study the key effect of dualistic network on technological innovation capability promotion as well as the structure and mechanism of dualistic network. Finally I studied how to build dualistic technological innovation network for China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and designed the program to build a compound type dualistic technological innovation network.
In chapter seven, I studied how to optimize the firm organizational structure of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Since enterprises are technological innovation subjects, their organizational structure optimization is an essential condition for technological innovation path optimization. This chapter firstly analyzed the mechanism by which corporate governance influences industrial escalation as well as the corporate governance bottle-neck of industrial escalation in Equipment Manufacturing Industry, and also the improvement measures are put forward accordingly. Next, based on resource-based theory and dynamic capability theory, I creatively put forward a new technological innovation pattern—inheritence innovation which effectively inherit and exploit firm resources. I demonstrated that inheritence innovation is the optimal choice to realize mutual synergy between resource accumulation, exploitation and competitive advantage creation, and then the organizational design was given for the management of inheritence innovation according to empirical evidence.
In chapter eight, the conclusion and enlightenment of this paper was raised, including:the optimal technological innovation path shoud realize mutual promotion between international technological diffusion and self R&D; the deviation of the technological innovation path of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry from optimal path has resulted in poor technological progress effect; the essence of the optimization of technological innovation path is just the optimization of industrial organization; effective policy support is of vital importance for the escalation of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry.
本文主要研究了以下内容：
第一章是绪论,阐释了论文的选题背景和研究意义,对相关文献进行了综述和评析,介绍了全文的结构安排、研究方法和主要创新之处。
第二章是技术后进下的最优技术创新路径分析。首先,阐释了技术创新及其实现路径。由于企业和产业组织形式决定了产业技术环境和企业竞争战略,从而决定企业技术创新的战略重点以及所采取技术创新模式,最终决定了技术创新绩效,因此本文将技术创新路径界定为由产业组织创新影响企业竞争战略,进而决定企业技术创新模式,最终决定技术创新绩效的整个过程。然后,针对技术创新路径方面的不同观点进行分析,得出利用国际技术扩散与自主研发二者对我国装备制造业发展都具有不可忽视的重要性。在此基础上,运用经济理论和经验证据分析自主研发与吸收国际技术扩散的互补性以及研发比较优势的内生性,进而得出了最优技术创新路径应该具备的基本特征：①在技术创新模式上以中高层次的技术引进消化吸收再创新和集成创新为主,实现外部技术资源与内部研发的协同作用；②在技术创新资源配置上以高研发投入和高消化吸收投入为特征；③在内部研发与外部技术利用的相互作用方面,应该表现为外部技术利用与内部研发相互支撑和相互促进的特征。④在技术进步效应方面,应该与世界先进装备制造业技术水平呈现收敛趋势。
第三章是我国装备制造业技术创新路径及其绩效分析。首先,阐述并分析了我国装备制造业技术创新路径演进过程及其基本特征,表明我国装备制造业与日韩产业技术创新路径的明显区别就是自主研发和消化吸收再创新经费投入严重不足,总体上表现为以低水平复制制造能力为主的低层次技术引进消化吸收再创新。然后,运用面板数据计量经济模型对我国装备制造业技术创新路径绩效进行实证分析,结果表明我国装备制造业未能实现吸收利用国际技术扩散与自主研发的相互促进,中高层次消化吸收再创新能力和集成创新能力明显不足。接着,从定性和定量两个方面分行业分析了我国装备制造业与国际先进水平的差距,结果表明我国装备制造业虽然在总量规模水平方面与世界先进水平的差距显著缩小,但是在人均劳动生产率和综合技术水平(全要素生产率)方面差距均没有明显减小,我国装备制造业技术水平仍远远落后于世界装备制造业强国美国,技术落后局面并未得到显著改善。本章研究结论是：由于我国装备制造业遵循的技术创新路径在技术创新模式和资源配置偏离了最优路径,从而导致未能形成外部技术利用与内部研发相互支撑和相互促进的良性循环,最终导致技术进步效应低下,未能缩小与先进装备制造业的技术差距。
第四章是我国装备制造业技术创新偏离最优路径的制约因素分析。首先从理论上对我国装备制造业自主创新动力机制缺失原因进行分析,然后运用pool数据计量模型进行实证分析,结果表明,研发创新活动的高外部性及高风险性、企业规模、公司治理水平、人力资本结构、市场需求、产业技术环境是影响企业自主研发动力的主要因素。最后基于分析结果提出了产业组织优化的基本方向。其一,促进产业集中度和企业规模水平的优化升级,提升技术创新投入能力和技术创新产品获利能力,从而提高研发创新能力。其二,优化微观企业组织结构,促进企业战略目标由追逐短期经济利益向深化科技能力和创造可持续性竞争优势回归,实现企业资源传承利用与技术创新的有效结合。其三,建立完善产业技术创新网络系统,整合产业科技资源,推进技术创新中的专业化分工与相互协作,俘获知识生产的规模收益递增效应。
第五章是产业集中度与研发密度的内生性协同升级机制研究。产业集中度升级和研发密度升级是促进装备制造业技术创新路径优化的关键因素,本章创新性地研究了我国装备制造业的内生性升级机制。首先运用Sutton的内生性产业升级理论阐释装备制造业产业集中度和研发投入密度升级的机制；然后以电子通讯设备制造业和电气设备制造业为例介绍了发达工业化国家装备制造业高集中度化和高研发密度化的升级过程；最后分析了我国装备制造业的产业集中度现状水平和产业升级面临的市场契机,并根据技术落后的具体情况,对经典的产业升级机制进行改进,创新性地提出我国装备制造业产业升级的路径和相应的促进措施。
第六章是我国装备制造业技术创新二元网络构建。装备制造业的系统性复杂性使得技术创新所需要的资源对于单个组织来说不可能完全具备,构建研发创新网络对于集成创新资源,降低风险和外部性从而优化技术创新路径至关重要。本章首先分析了研发网络的基本内涵以及形成条件和过程,研发网络的管理机制；然后运用规范分析和案例分析研究二元网络组织对于提升技术创新能力的关键性作用以及二元网络的结构和机理；最后研究了我国装备制造业研发创新网络的构建,提出复合型二元网络的构建方案。
第七章是我国装备制造业企业组织结构优化。企业作为技术创新的主体,其组织结构优化是技术创新路径优化的根本条件。本章首先分析了公司治理影响装备制造业升级的机制以及我国装备制造业升级的公司治理瓶颈,并提出了相应的改进措施；然后基于资源基础理论和动态能力理论创新性地提出了以资源传承和有效利用为基础的传承性创新方式,论证了传承性创新是实现企业资源积累、利用与竞争优势创造相互协同的最优选择,并基于经验研究给出了管理传承性创新的组织设计模式。
第八章是研究结论与启示。总结全文得出如下结论与启示：最优技术创新路径应该实现国际技术利用与自主研发相互促进；我国装备制造业偏离最优技术创新路径导致技术进步效应低下；技术创新路径优化的本质在于产业组织优化；有效的政策支持对于我国装备制造业升级至关重要。
Many theoretical and empirical research findings have revealed that technology is a key element in determining productivity and national competitiveness. As a strategic industry providing technical equipments for other industries of national economy, the importance of Equipment Manufacturing Industry for national competitiveness has been widely recognized while the competitiveness escalation of Equipment Manufacturing Industry is largely determined by its technological innovation capability. A distinctive feature of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry is "large but not powerful" compared with advanced Equipment Manufacturing Industry. At present, heavy industry in our country is getting into the accelerated development period, new-type industrialization and transformation of economic growth pattern need a large amount of advanced technical equipment to be supported. Thus the technological innovation capability escalation for Equipment Manufacturing Industry is of great urgency. This paper analyzed the technological innovation path and performance of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and did a systematic study on how to optimize the path of technological innovation. The purpose of this study is to push theoretical and practical research to promote the technological innovation capability of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry.
The main content of this paper is summarized in following:
The first chapter is introduction. I expound the background and meaning of this study. Then I do a literature review, and introduce the structure, method and innovation of this paper.
The second chapter analyzed the optimal technological innovation path on condition that the technology is lagging behind. In the first technological innovation and its realization path is explained. Because the organization of enterprise and industry determines the technological envirment of the indusry and firm's competitive strategy, thereby it determines firm's strategic emphasis and mode of technological innovation, and it finally determines the performance of technological innovation. Therefore this paper defines technological innovation path as the entire process in which industrial organizational innovation influences firm's competitive strategy and thereby influnces mode of technological innovation and finally determines the performance of technological innovation. Then I make an analysis on different viewpoint about technological innovation path and draw a conclusion that exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D are all of nonnegligible importance. Based on the foregoing analysis, I analyzed the complementarity between exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D as well as the endogeneity of R&D comparative advantage using economic theory and empirical evidences, consequently the essential feature of optimal technological innovation path is put forward. It includes:①the modes of technological innovation shoud mainly take the form of middle to high-level digestive absorption innovation and integrative innovation to synergize external technology resources and internal R&D;②the allocation of technological innovation resouces should manifest high R&D intensity and high level digestive absorption investment;③exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D should mutually support and promote;④the technological progress should have a tendency of convergence to the technological level of world advanced Equipment Manufacturing Industry.
The third chapter analyzed the technological innovation path and its performance of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. In the first, I expound and analyzed the evolvement process and essential features of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Compared with Japan and South Koreathe distinguished feature of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry is that self R&D and digestive absorption innovation are both severely undercapitalized and the emphasis is put on copying foreign manufacturing capacity at a low level. Then I make an empirical analysis on the performance of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry using panal data econometric model. The result of the econometric analysis revealed that the capability of middle to high-level digestive absorption innovation and integrative innovation is of significant deficiency and failed to realize mutual promotion between exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D. Next the disparity between China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and world advanced level is analyzed from qualitative and quantitative aspects. The result is that although the scale gap between China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and world advanced level is significantly reduced, but the per capita productivity and Total Factor Productivity is far behind the world advanced level and the gap did not become narrower. The situation of technological lagging behind of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry has not been improved. The conclusion of this chapter is that because the technological innovation mode of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry deviated from the optimal path, thereby it is unable to generate mutual promotion between exploiting international technology diffusion and self R&D, consequently it resulted in poor technological progress effect and the unnarrowed technological gap.
In chapter four, I analyzed the constraints which cause the deviation of the technological innovation path of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry from the optimal path. Firstly I theretically analyzed the causes of self R&D shortage of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry, next the econometrical analysis is made by a pool data model. The conclusion is that high externality and high-risk, enterprise scale, corporate governance, human capital strcture, and industrial technological environment are key factors influencing firm's self R&D motive. Finally the fundamental direction for optimization is put forward based on the forgoing analysis. It included:①to facilitate escalation of industrial concentration and firm scale thereby to promote investment capabiity and profitability of technological innovation;②to optimize firm organization at micro level thereby to enable firm to shift its strategy from pursuing short term economic interest to sustainable competitive advantage creation and also to realize effective combination between firm resources inheritance and technological innovation;③to establish industrial technological innovation network system thereby to integrate technological resources and promote specialization and cooperation of technological innovation and consequently to realize the great scale economy effect of knowledge production.
In chapter five, I studied the endogenous synergetic escalation mechanism of industrial concentration and R&D intensity. The escalation of industrial concentration and R&D intensity is of essential importance to technological innovation path optimization. I creatively studied the endogenous escalation mechanism of china's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Firstly I use Sutton's endogenous escaltion theory to expound the endogenous escalation mechanism of of industrial concentration and R&D intensity. Next the escalation process of the Equipment Manufacturing Industry of industrialized countries is analyzed. Finally I studied the concentration level and market opportunity for China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry, and made an improvement on the classical escalation theory to put forward the boosting measures for the escalation of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry according to its technological lagging situation.
In chapter six, I have done a study on how to build the dualistic technological innovation network of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. System complexity of Equipment Manufacturing Industry makes it impossible for one organization to possess all needed resources for technological innovation. To build technological innovation network is of vital importance to the integration of technological innovation resources and thereby to the technological innovation path optimization. This chapter firstly analyzed the basic connotation of R&D network as well as the formation condition, formation process and governance mechanism of R&D network. Next normative analysis and case analysis were made to study the key effect of dualistic network on technological innovation capability promotion as well as the structure and mechanism of dualistic network. Finally I studied how to build dualistic technological innovation network for China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry and designed the program to build a compound type dualistic technological innovation network.
In chapter seven, I studied how to optimize the firm organizational structure of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Since enterprises are technological innovation subjects, their organizational structure optimization is an essential condition for technological innovation path optimization. This chapter firstly analyzed the mechanism by which corporate governance influences industrial escalation as well as the corporate governance bottle-neck of industrial escalation in Equipment Manufacturing Industry, and also the improvement measures are put forward accordingly. Next, based on resource-based theory and dynamic capability theory, I creatively put forward a new technological innovation pattern—inheritence innovation which effectively inherit and exploit firm resources. I demonstrated that inheritence innovation is the optimal choice to realize mutual synergy between resource accumulation, exploitation and competitive advantage creation, and then the organizational design was given for the management of inheritence innovation according to empirical evidence.
In chapter eight, the conclusion and enlightenment of this paper was raised, including:the optimal technological innovation path shoud realize mutual promotion between international technological diffusion and self R&D; the deviation of the technological innovation path of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry from optimal path has resulted in poor technological progress effect; the essence of the optimization of technological innovation path is just the optimization of industrial organization; effective policy support is of vital importance for the escalation of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry.
引文
[1]Acemoglu, Daron; Simon Johnson and James Robinson. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development[J]. Amer. Econ. Rev.2001,91(5), pp.1369-401.
[2]Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith and Peter Howitt. Competition and innovation:an inverted U relationship[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics May 2005, Vol.120, No.2, pp.701-728.
[3]Aldrich, H. E.. Organizations and Environments[M]. New York:Prentice-Hall.1979, ISBN 1419629026.
[4]Alwyn Young. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade[R). NBER Working Papers,1991,3577.
[5]Angelmar, R. Market structure and Research Intensity in. High Technological Opportunity Industries[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1985,Vol.34,69-79.
[6]Arrow, K. J. Economic Welfare and the Allocation on Resources for Invention[R) NBER,1962, Princeton.
[7]Astley W. and Fombrun C. Collective strategy:Social ecology of organizational environments[J].Academy of Management Review,1983, ISSN 0363-7425,8(4): 576-587.
[8]Audretsch, D. B. and Vivarelli, M. Small Firms and R&D Spillovers:Evidence from Italy[R). CEPR Discussion Paper,1994,927.
[9]Auster E. Macro and strategic perspectives on interorganizational linkages:A comparative analysis and review with suggestions for reorientation[J]. Advances in Strategic Management,1994,ISBN 1559387270,10B:3-40.
[10]Banerjee, Abhijit and Lakshmi Iyer. History, Institutions, and Economic Performance:The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India[R). BREAD work. pap.2003.
[11]Barney J. B..Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management 1991,17,99-129.
[12]Basant, R., Fikkert, B. The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1996,78 (2),187-199.
[13]Basu, Susanto and David Weil. Appropriate Technology and Growth[J]. Quart. J. Econ.1998,113:4, pp.1025-54.
[14]Becker,W. and Peters, J. Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities and innovation[R). Paper presented at The Eighth International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Manchester, July,2000.
[15]Bell, M. and Pavitt, K. Technological accumulation and industrial growth:Contrasts between developed and developing countries[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1993,2,157-209.
[16]Bertalanffy L. General system theory[M].Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General System Theory,1956, ISBN 0807604534,1:1-10.
[17]Biemans, W G. Managing Innovations Within Networks[M]. London:Routledge. 1992.
[18]Block, Z.,& MacMillan, I. Corporate venturing[M]. Cambridge MA:Harvard Business School Press,1993.
[19]Bierly, P. E. and Coombs, J. E. Equity alliances, stages of product development, and alliance instability [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2004, ISSN 0923-4748,21(3):191-214.
[20]Braga, H. and Willmore, L. Technological Imports and Technological Effort:An Analysis of their Determinants in Brazilian Firms[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1991,39 (4),421—432.
[21]Brown, S. L., K. M. Eisenhardt. The art of continuous change:Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations[J]. Admin. Sci. Quart.1997,42,1-34.
[22]Browning, L D, J M Beyer and J C Shetler. Building cooperation in a competitive industry:SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(1),113-151.
[23]Burt, R. Strategic Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[24]Christensen, C. M. The Innovator's Dilemma[M]. HBS Press, Boston, MA.1997.
[25]Clark, K. B., T. Fujimoto. Product Development Performance:Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry[M]. HBS Press,
Cambridge, MA.1991.
[26]Coe, D., and E. Helpman. International R&D Spillovers[J]. European Economic. Review,1995,39, pp.859-887.
[27]Cohen, W. Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change[C]. MA:Blackwell Publishing,1995, pp.182-264.
[28]Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. Innovation and Learning:the two faces of R&D[J]. The Economic Journal,1989,99,569-596.
[29]Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35,128-52.
[30]Daron Acemoglu & Joshua Linn. Market Size in Innovation:Theory and Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry[R). NBER Working Papers,2003,10038.
[31]Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity[J]. Economic Journal,1980,90 (358),266—293.
[32]Demsetz, H. Information and Efficiency:Another Viewpoint[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1969,12,1—22.
[33]Debresson C, Amesse F. Networks of Innovators:A Review and Introduction to the Issue[J]. Research Policy,1991(20):363—379.
[34]De la Fuente, Angel, and Rafael Domenech. Human Capital in Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality Make?[R). CEPR Discussion Paper 2000, No.2466.
[35]Dierickx, I and Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage[J]. Management Science,1989,35:1504-1514.
[36]Dosi, G. Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1988, ⅩⅩⅥ,1120-1171.
[37]Doz Y, Olk P, and Ring P. Formation processes of R&D consortia:which path to take? Where does it lead?[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3),239-266.
[38]Doz, Y. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances:Initial conditions or learning processes?[J] Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(Summer Special issue),55-83.
[39]Dyer, J and K Nobeoka. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(3),345-367.
[40]Easterly, William and Ross Levine. It's Not Factor Accumulation:Stylized Facts and Growth Models[R). World Bank Econ. Rev.2001,15:2, pp.177-219.
[41]Eaton, Jonathan and Samuel Kortum. Trade in Ideas:Patenting and Productivity in the OECD[J]. Int. Econ.1996,40:3-4, pp.251-78.
[42]Edwards, Sebastian. Openness. Productivity and Growth What do We Really Know?[J]. Economic Journal,1998,108,383-398.
[43]Feldman, M. P. Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation[J]. Small Business Economics,1994,Vol.6,pp.363-372.
[44]Foster, R., S. Kaplan. Creative Destruction:Why Companies that Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—And How to Successfully Transform Them[R) Currency, New York.2001.
[45]Francesca Visintin et al. Italian Success and British Survival:Case studies of corporate governance and innovation in a mature industry[J]. Technovation,25 (June 2005),621-629.
[46]Freeman, C. Network of innovators:A synthesis of research issues[J]. Research Policy,1991(20).
[47]Futia, Carl A. Schumpeterian Competition[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,94, No.4 (1980),675-695.
[48]Galbraith J. Designing Complex Organizations[M]. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley. 1973.
[49]Galunic, D. C., K. M. Eisenhardt. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms[J]. Acad. Management.2001,44(6) 1229-1249.
[50]Gemunden, H, T Ritter and P Heydebreck. Network configuration and innovation success:an empirical analysis in German high-tech industries [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing,1996,13(5),449-462.
[51]G.M.Grossman and E.Helpman. Comparative advantage and long run growth[J]. American Economic Review,1990,80:796-815,.
[52]G Padula. Enhancing the innovation performance of firms by balancing cohesiveness and bridging ties[J]. Long Range Planning,2008,41 (4), pp.395-415.
[53]Granovetter, M. Economic Action and Social Structure:the Problem of Embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1985, Vol.91.
[54]Grant, R. M. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue,1996, (17), pp.109-122.
[55]Griffith, Rachel; Stephen Redding, and John Van Reenen. Mapping Two Faces of R&D:Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries[R). forthcoming, Rev. Econ. Statist.2000.
[56]Griliches, Zvi. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth [J]. Bell Journal of Economics,1979,10:92-1161.
[57]Griliches, Zvi. R&D and Productivity Econometric Results and Measurement Issues, in P. Stoneman, (ed.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change[M]. Oxford:Blackwell.1995.
[58]Grossman, Gene, and Helpman Elhanan. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.1991.
[59]Guare J. Six Degree of Separation:A Play [M). New York:Vintage Books,1990.
[60]Gulati, R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice of alliances [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(1), 85-112.
[61]Gulati, R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998, ISSN 0143-2095,19(4):293-317.
[62]Guo,Bin. Technology acquisition channels and industry performance:An industry-level analysis of Chinese large-and medium-size manufacturing enterprises[J]. Research Policy 2008,37,194-209.
[63]Guth, W. D.,& Ginsberg, A. Guest editors' Introduction:Corporate entrepreneurship[J].Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:5-15.
[64]Hagedoorn, J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993, ISSN 0143-2095,14(5):371-385.
[65]Hall, B. H. and J. Mairesse. Exploring the Relationship Between R&D and Pro-ductivity in French Manufacturing Firms[R). NBER Working Paper, No. (1992),3956.
[66]Hall, Robert and Charles Jones. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?[J]. Quart. J. Econ.1999,114:1, pp.83-116.
[67]Harrigan, K. Strategies for Joint Ventures[M]. Lexington, MA:Lexington Books, (1985) ISBN 0669104485.
[68]Heikkinen M, Tahtinen J. Managed formation process of a R&D network[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management (2006)10:271-298.
[69]Hellstrom, T andMJacob. Evaluating and managing the performance of universityindustry partnership:from central rule to dynamic research networks [J]. Evaluation,1999,5(3),330-339.
[70]Henderson, R., K. B. Clark. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Admin. Sci. Quart.1990,35(1) 9-30.
[71]Hennart, J. F. A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal, (1988) ISSN 0143-2095,9:361-376.
[72]Holmes, Thomas J., and James Schmitz. A Gain From Trade From Unproductive to Productive Entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2001,47, 417-446.
[73]Iansiti, M., West, J. Technology Integration: turning great research into great products[J]. HBR May-June 1997.
[74]Hipkinand and P. Naude. Developing effective alliance partnerships:lessons from a case study[J].Long Range Planning,2006,39(1),51e69.
[75]Hollanders, H., ter Weel, B. Technology, knowledge spillovers and changes in employment structure:evidence from six OECD countries[J]. Labour Economics,2002,9,579-599.
[76]Howitt, Peter. Endogenous Growth and Cross-Country Income Differences [J]. Amer. Econ Rev.2000,90:4, pp.829-46.
[77]Hu, A.G. and Jefferson, G.H. Returns to Research and Development in Chinese Industry: Evidence from State-owned Enterprises in Beijing. China Economic Review,2004, Vol.15, No.1, pp.86-107.
[78]Hu,A.G, Jefferson,G. H., Qian Jinchang. R&D and technology transfer: firm-level evidence from Chinese industry[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,2005,87(4),
780-786.
[79]Imai, K. and Itami, H..Interpretation of organization and Market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, (1984) ISSN 0167-7187,2:285-310.
[80]Jacobs, M.T. Short-term America: The causes and cures of our business myopia[M].Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.1991.
[81]Jaffe, A.B. Real effects of Academic Research [J], American Economic Review. 1989,79 (5):957-9701.
[82]J. Carlos Fdez. de Arroyabe & Nieves Arranz. Management in R&D networks as complex systems:The case of European networks[J]. E:CO Issue 2006,Vol.8 No.3 pp.24-39.
[83]J.C. Spender. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17,Winter pp45-62
[84]Jefferson, G.H., Bai Huamao, Guan Xiaojing,Yu Xiaoyun. R&D performance in Chinese industry[R). Graduate School of International Economics and Finance, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA,2002.
[85]Jian Tong. High-tech and High Capability in a Growth Model[J]. International Economic Review,2005,46 (1),215-243.
[86]Joglekar, P., Bohl, A.H. and Hamburg, M. Comments on Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm[J]. Management Science, (1997),43(10),1455-62.
[87]Jones, O, S Conway and F Steward. Introduction: social interaction and innovation networks[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,1998,2(2),123-136.
[88]Johnson, R., Hoskisson. R.,& Hitt, M. Board of director involvement in restructuring: The effect importance of board versus managerial controls and characteristics[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(special issue):33-51.
[89]Jones. G.,& Butler. J. Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship:An agency theory perspective [J]. Journal of Management,1992,18:733-749.
[90]Jones, O, S Conway and F Steward. Introduction:social interaction and innovation networks[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,1998,2(2),123-136.
[91]J. S. Coleman. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology 1988,94(Suppl),S95eS120.
[92]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. Market Structure,Elasticity of Demand and Incentive to Invent[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1970,13,241—252.
[93]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Timing of Innovations under Rivalry[J]. Econometrica,1972,40,43—60.
[94]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Patent Life and R&D Rivalry[J]. American Economic Review,1974,64,183—187.
[95]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. On the Degree of Rivalry for Maximum Innovative Activity[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1976,90,245—260.
[96]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. Self financing of an R&D Project[J]. American Economic Review,1978a,68,252—261.
[97]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Potential Rivalry, Monopoly Profits and the Pace of Inventive Activity [J]. Review of Economic Studies,1978b,45,547—557.
[98]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Market Structure and Innovation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1982.
[99]Kang, M. H. Economic Concentration and Innovation[J]. Kyong-Je-Hak-Yon-Gu, 1994, Vol.41, pp.3-25.
[100]Kim, B. M. The Relationship between R & D and Firm Size in the Raw Material Synthetic Industry in Korea[J]. The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, 1992, Vol.1, pp.85-104.
[101]Kleinknecht, A. and Reijnen, J.O.N. Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study[J]. Research Policy, (1992) 21,347-60.
[102]Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. On the Sources and Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities [J]. Research Policy,1995, 24,185-205.
[103]Kok, R, B Hillebrand and W Biemans. What makes product development market oriented? Toward conceptual framework[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2003,7(2),137-162.
[104]Kogut, B.. Joint ventures:Theoretical and empirical perspectives [J]. Strategic Management Journal, (1988) ISSN 0143-2095,9:319-332.
[105]Kuratko. D. F.. Montagno. R. V., & Hornsby. J. S. Developing an entrepreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:49-58.
[106]Lall, S. Technological capabilities and industrialization.World Development[J]. (1992)20,165-86.
[107]Lawler, EJ and J Yoon. Power and the emergence of commitment behaviour in negotiated exchange[J]. American Sociological Review,1993,58(4),456-481.
[108]Lawrence, P.R. "The Harvard Organization:An environment research program,"in Van der Ven y Joice (eds.), Perspectives on Organization:Design and Behavior[M]. New York:John Wiley, (1981).ISBN 0471093580.
[109]Lee, C-Y. A new perspective on industry R&D and market structure[J]. Journal of Industrial. Economics 2005,53:101-22.
[110]Levin, R. C., Cohen, W. M. and Mowery, D. C. R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure:New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses [J]. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings,1985,75(2),20—24.
[111]Liu, X., White, R.S. The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries[J]. Technovation,1997, 17(3),119-125.
[112]Liu, Z. Foreign direct investment and technology spillover:evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2002,30,579-602.
[113]Loury, G. C. Market Structure and Innovation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979,93,395—410.
[114]Love, J. and Roper, S. The Determinants of Innovation:R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects[J]. Review of Industrial Organization,1999,Vol.15, pp. 43-64.
[115]Lucas, RE, Jr. On the Mechanics of Economic Development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics (1988)22:3-42.
[116]Lumpkin, G. T.,& Dess, G. G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996,21: 135-172.
[117]Lundvall, B. A. and Johnson, B. Promoting Innovation Systems as a Response to the Globalising Learning Economy[R). Draft of Contribution to the project Local Productive Clusters and Innovations Systems in Brazil:New industrial and technological policies. Setembro. Rio de Janeiro. Brazil,2000.
[118]MacPherson, A. D. A Comparison of Within-firm and External Sources of Product Innovation[J].Growth and Change,1997,Vol.28, pp.289-308.
[119]Michael J. Boskin and Lawrence J. Lau. Generalized Solow—Neutral Technical Progress and Postwar Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper.2000.
[120]Malatesta, P.,& Walling, R. Poison pill securities:Stockholder wealth profitability and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1988,20:374-376.
[121]Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, (1993)2,45-71.
[122]Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,1997,6(1),83-117.
[123]Mankiw, Nicholas G, David, Romer, and David Weil. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1992,107, 407-437.
[124]McLoughlin, I, C Koch and K Dickson. What's this "tosh"? Innovation networks and new product development as a political process[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2001,5(3),275-298.
[125]Metcalfe, S., Ramlogan, R. Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (2007), doi:10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021
[126]M. Gargiulo and M. Benassi. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes and the adaptation of social capital[J]. Organization Science (2000)11(2),183e196.
[127]Michael Tushman and David Nadler. organizing for innovation. California Management Review.1986, Volume ⅩⅩⅩⅧ(3).
[128]Mitsuru Kodama. Knowledge Creation through Networked Strategic Communities-Case Studies on New Product Development in Japanese Companies. Long Range Planning,2005,38, pp.27-49.
[129]Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. Characteristics of partnership success:Partnership attributes, communication, behavior, and conflict resolution techniques[J]. Strategic Management Journal, (1994)ISSN 0143-2095,15:135-152.
[130]Mytelka, L. Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy[J]. Industry and Innovation, (2000)7(1),15-32.
[131]Nahapiet,J., and S. Ghoshal. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, (1998),Vol.23, No.2,242-266.
[132]Nelson, R. R. and G. Wright. The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,,1992,30(4):1931-1964.
[133]Nelson, Richard and Edmunds Phelps. Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth[J]. Amer. Econ. Rev.1966,56:2, pp.69-75.
[134]Nelson, R. and Winter, S. In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation[J]. Research Policy, (1977)6,36-76.
[135]Nelson, R. and Winter, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change[M]. Harvard US:Harvard University Press,1982.
[136]Nobelius, D. Towards the sixth generation of R&D management[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2005,22(5),369-375.
[137]Oltra, Maria J. and Flor, Marisa. The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Innovative Capabilities on Firms' Output Innovation[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.12, pp.137-144, September 2003.
[138]Palmberg, C. The sources of innovations—Looking beyond technological opportunities[J]. Econ. Innov. New Techn.,2004,13 (2), pp.183-197.
[139]Parente, Stephen, and Edward C. Prescott. Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1994,102(2),298-321.
[140]Paul Romer. Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy.,1986,Vol.94, No.5. pp.1002-1037.
[141]Paul Romer. Growth Based on lnereasing Returns Due to Specialization[J]. American Eeonomie Review,1987,77,2 (may), pp.56-62.
[142]Paul Romer. Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History and the Orgins of Modern. Economic Growth[J]. American Economic Review (May,1996) pp.202-206.
[143]Paul Romer. Endogenous Technological Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98(5):71-102.
[144]Paul M. Romer. Idea Gaps and Object Gaps in Economic Development[J]. Journal of. Monetary Economics 32 (December 1993):543-73.
[145]Pavitt, K. Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change-Towards a Taxonomy and Theory[J]. Research Policy, (1984)13,343-373.
[146]Penrose, E. T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm[M]. Basil Blackwell, London, UK,1959.
[147]Peters, L, P Groenowegen and N Fiebelkorm. A comparison of networks between industry and public sector research in materials technology and biotechnology[J]. Research Policy, (1998)27(3),255-271.
[148]Pissarides, Chris. Economic Growth:How Much Does Education Count?[R) CentrePiece,3,London; CEP, London School of Economics.1996.
[149]Porter, M. E. Competitive Advantage[M]. New York, NY:Free Press, (1985).ISBN 068481460.
[150]Porter, M, E. Capital disadvantage:America's failing capital investment system[J]. Harvard Business Review,1992,70:65-82.
[151]Prescott, Edward. Needed A Theory of Total Factor Productivity[J]. Int. Econ. Rev. 1998,39:3, pp.525-51.
[152]Pritchett, Lant. Where Has All the Education Gone?[J]. World Bank Economic Review.2001,15(3),367-391.
[153]Ramirez, P., Tylecote, A. Hybrid Corporate Governance and Its Effects on Innovation:A Case Study of AstraZeneca[R). Sheffield University, Mimeo,2003.
[154]Rana Hasan. The impact of imported and domestic technologies on the productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing firms [R). East-West Center Working Papers, 2000, Economics Series, No.6.
[155]Raut L.K. R&D Spillover and Productivity Growth:Evidence from Indian Private Firms[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1995, (48):1—23.
[156]R.E. Lucas. Making a Miracle[J]. Econometrica,1993,61,251-72
[157]Ryu, S. H. Analyzing the Determinants of Company R D Investment:Using & a Semi-parametric Estimation Method[J]. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society,2003, Vol.6, pp.279-297.
[158]Rice, M. P., G. C. O'Connor, R. Leifer, C. M. McDermott, T.Standish-Kuon. Corporate venture capital models for promoting radical innovation[J]. Marketing Theory Practice,2000,8(3)1-10.
[159]Ring, P and AH Van de Ven. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, (1994)13(1), 90-119.
[160]Ritter, T and HG Gemunden. Network competence:its impact on innovation success and its antecedents[J]. Journal of Business Research, (2003)56(9), 745-755.
[161]Ritter, T, I Wilkinson and W Johnston. Managing in complex business networks [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, (2004)33(3),175-183.
[162]Rivera-Batiz, Luis and Paul Romer. Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth[J]. Quart. J. Econ.1991,106:2, pp.531-55.
[163]Roberts, E. B. and Mizouchi, R. Interfirm technological collaboration:The case of Japanese biotechnology [J]. Technology Management, (1989) ISSN 0895-6308, 4(1):43-61.
[164]Roe, M. J. Strong managers, weak owners[M]. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press,1994.
[165]Rosenberg, N. Technological change in the machine tool industry,1840-1910[J]. Journal of Economic History, (1963) Vol.4 pp.414-443.
[166]Rosenberg, N. Inside the Black Box:Technology and Economics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1982.
[167]Rosenberg, N. Science and Technology in the Twentieth Century. In Dosi, G, Giannetti, R. and Toninelli, P.(eds.) Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective. Oxford:Claredon Press,1992.
[168]Rothwell, R. Towards the fifth generation innovation process[J]. International Market Review, (1994) ISSN 0265-1335,22(3):56-75.
[169]Rothwell, R. The Characteristics of Successful. Innovators and Technically Progressive Firms[J]. R&D. Management,1977,7(3), pp.191-206.
[170]Sakakibara, M. Formation of R&D consortia:industry and company effects[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(11),1033-1050.
[171]Sanjaya lall. reinventing industrial strategy:the role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. Paper prepared for The Intergovernmental Group on Monetary Affairs and Development (G-24), UNCTAD, Geneva,2003.
[172]Saxenian, A. L. Regional Advantage:Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and. Route 128[J]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1994.
[173]Scherer, F. M. Research and Development Resource Allocation under Rivalry[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1967a,81 (3),359—394.
[174]Scherer, F.M. Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers[J]. American Economic Review,1967b,57(3),524—531.
[175]Scherer,F.M. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance[M]. Second Edition, Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1980.
[176]Scherer, Frederic M. Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1982,64,627-634.
[177]Scherer, F. M. and Ross, D. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston:Houghton-Mifflin.1990.
[178]Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York:Harper.1942.
[179]S.Conway and F. Steward. Networks and interfaces in environmental innovation:a comparative study in the UK and Germany[J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research (1998), pp.239-254.
[180]Scott, J. T. Firm Versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity. in Griliches, Z. (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1984.
[181]Shiue, Carol H. and Wolfgang Keller. Markets in China and Europe on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution. CEPR discus. pap.4420,2004.
[182]Siggelkow, N., D. A. Levinthal. Temporarily divide to conquer:Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation[J]. Organ. Sci.2003,14(6) 650-669.
[183]Smith,W.K., Tushman, M. L. Managing strategic contradictions:a top management model for managing innovation streams[J]. Organ. Sci.2005,16(5) 522-536.
[184]Soete, L. L. G.. Firm Size and Innovation Activity[J]. European Economic Review, 1979,12,319—340.
[185]Sokoloff, Kenneth L. Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America:Evidence from Patent Records[J]. Journal of Economic History 1988,48(4):813-850.
[186]Solow, Robert. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1957,39:312-320.
[187]Sterlacchini, A. Technological opportunities, intraindustry spillovers and firm R&D intensity[J]. Economic Innovation and New Technology,(1994) 3,123-37.
[188]Stopford, f, M, & Baden-Fuller, C. Creating corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:521-536.
[189]Stokey, Nancy L. Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New. Goods[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1988,96,701-717.
[190]Stokey, Nancy. The Volume and Composition of Trade Between Rich and Poor Countries[J]. Review of. Economic Studies,1991,58,63-84.
[191]Sung, T. K. Firm Characteristics and Innovative Activity: With Special Reference to Schumpeterian Hypothesis[J]. The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, (2001), Vol.9, pp.133-155.
[192]Sung, T. K. A Firm Size-Innovative Activity Relationship:An Empirical Study of the Korean Manufacturing Industry[J]. The Korean Small Business Review, 2003,Vol.25, pp.305-325.
[193]Sung, T. K. and Carlsson, B. The Evolution of a Technological System:The Case of CNC Machine Tools in Korea[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2003, Vol. 13, pp.435-460.
[194]Sung, T. and Carlsson, B. Network Effects, Technological Opportunity, and Innovation:Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Firms[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation (2007),15,1.
[195]Sutton, J. Technology and Market Structure[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1998.
[196]Tirole, Jean. Corporate Governance[J]. Econometrica, Econometric Society, 2001,vol.69(1), pages 1-35,
[197]Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[R). Oxford University Press,2000.
[198]Temple, Jonathan. Generalizations That Aren't? Evidence on Education and Growth[J]. European Economic Review,2001,45,905-918.
[199]Tidd, J. and Trewhella, M. Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning[J]. R&D Management, (1997), ISSN 0033-6807,27(4):359-375.
[200]Tushman, M. L., C. A. O'Reilly. Ambidextrous organizations:managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review.1996, 38(4).
[201]Tylecote, A., Conesa, E. Corporate governance, innovation systems and industrial performance[J]. Industry and Innovation,1999,6(1),25-50.
[202]Veugelers, R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing[J]. Research Policy, (1997) 26,303-315.
[203]Walker, G. and Weber, D. A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, (1984) ISSN 0001-8392,29(2):373-391.
[204]Watts D J, Strongatz S H. Collective Dynamics of'Small World' Networks [J]. Nature,1998,393:440-44.
[205]W.Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne. Strategy,Value Innovation,and the Knowledge Economy[J]. Sloan Management Review Spring 1999.
[206]W.C. Kim and R. Mauborgne. Value Innovation:The Strategic Logic of High Growth[J]. Harvard Business Review, July-August 2004.
[207]Wernerfelt, B. A resource based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984,5, pp.171-180.
[208]Westerman, G. et al. organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle[J]. Organ. Sci.2006,17(2) 230-238.
[209]William L. Miller. Innovation rules[J]. Research Technology Management March-April 2006
[210]Williamson, O. E. The theory of the firm as a governance structure:From choice to contract[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, (2002)ISSN 0895-3309,16(3): 171-196.
[211]Wolfgang Keller. International Technology Diffusion[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2004, vol.42(3), pages 752-782.
[212]Woolcock, M. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework[J]. Theory and Society, (1998), No.2, Vol.27, pp. 151-207.
[213]Yasemin Y. Kor.,Joseph T. Mahoney. Penrose's Resouce-Based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity [J]. Journal of Management Studies 37:1 January 2000 0022-2380.
[214]Yasemin Y. Kor.,Joseph T. Mahoney. Edith Penrose's (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management[J]. Journal of Management Studies 41:1 January 2004 0022-2380.
[215]Zahra,S.A.Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39 (6), pp.1713-1735.
[216]安同良,施浩和Alcorta.中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证——基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析[J].经济研究,2006(2)
[217]本.斯泰尔等编.技术创新与经济绩效[M].上海人民出版社,2006
[218]成思危.也谈技术创新的三种类型.中国知识产权局网站。
[219]陈柳钦.产业集群技术创新环境论综述[J].南都学坛,2007(02)
[220]陈仲常,余翔.企业研发投入的外部环境影响因素研究—基于产业层面的面板数据分析[J].科研管理,2007(2)
[221]樊霞,朱桂龙.基于小世界模型的企业创新网络研究[J].软科学,2008,22(1)
[222]冯锋,王亮.产学研合作创新网络培育机制分析——基于小世界网络模型[J].中国软科学,2008(11)
[223]冯梅.我国装备制造业技术进步研究：1996—2006[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2008(2)
[224]符平.“嵌入性”：两种取向及其分歧[J].社会学研究,2009(5)
[225]高梁.破除比较优势迷信,以自主技术强国.网上材料
[226]郭克莎.对中国外贸战略与贸易政策的评论[J].国际经济评论,2003(9)
[227]郭振军,汪建成.基于技术引进、消化吸收的自主创新路径研究——广日电梯自主集成创新能力的形成与演进[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(3)
[228]华民.比较优势、自主创新、经济增长和收入分配——何为中国未来经济发展之道路?[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2007(5)
[229]黄烨菁.开放条件下的技术进步——从技术引进到自主创新[J].世界经济研究,2008(6)
[230]“技术创新研究”课题组.中国企业技术创新政策基础及实证研究[J].管理世界,1996(2)：123-132
[231]林毅夫,孙希芳.经济发展的比较优势战略理论——兼评《对中国外贸战略与 贸易政策的评论》[J].国际经济评论,2003,11—12
[232]林毅夫,张鹏飞.适宜技术、技术选择和发展中国家的经济增长[EB／OL].北京大学中国.经济研究中心讨论稿,2005
[233]马龙龙.流通产业组织[M].清华大学出版社,2006
[234]迈克尔.波特著,陈小悦译.竞争优势[M].华夏出版社,1997
[235]马西莫·莫塔著,沈国华译.竞争政策—理论与实践[M].上海财经大学出版社,2006
[236]上海市经济委员会、上海科学技术情报研究所编著.2008年版：世界制造业重点行业发展动态[M].上海科学技术文献出版社,2008
[237]上海申银万国.2020年的中国装备制造业研究报告[R].网上材料
[238]王国跃等.技术引进的日韩模式分析及我国发展战略[J].对外经济贸易大学学报2005(1)
[239]魏杰.中国经济之变局[M].中国发展出版社,2009
[240]翁华强,郭凤典和管名.中国汽车业自主创新路径之探讨[J].特区经济,2004.(12)。
[241]吴延兵.R&D、创新与生产率——中国工业产业的经验证据[D).2006年中国社会科学院研究生院博士学位论文。
[242]吴延兵.中国工业创新水平及影响因素[J].产业经济评论,2006,5(2)
[243]吴延兵.企业规模、市场力量与创新：一个文献综述[J].经济研究,2007(5)
[244]徐建平、夏国平.我国装备制造业的国际比较及对策研究[J].中国机械工程,2008(20)
[245]阎莉.日本技术引进成功经验探析[J].日本研究,2008(2)
[246]张富春.企业集团组织导论[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1998
[247]张国宝.装备制造业的自主创新问题[EB／OL].中央政府门户网站：www.gov.cn
[248]周黎安,罗凯.企业规模与创新：来自中国省级水平的经验证据[J].经济学(季刊),2005,4(3)
[249]朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响[J].经济研究,2003(6)：45-53
[250]左大培.绕过比较优势“陷阱”,以技术立国.网上材料
[2]Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith and Peter Howitt. Competition and innovation:an inverted U relationship[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics May 2005, Vol.120, No.2, pp.701-728.
[3]Aldrich, H. E.. Organizations and Environments[M]. New York:Prentice-Hall.1979, ISBN 1419629026.
[4]Alwyn Young. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade[R). NBER Working Papers,1991,3577.
[5]Angelmar, R. Market structure and Research Intensity in. High Technological Opportunity Industries[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1985,Vol.34,69-79.
[6]Arrow, K. J. Economic Welfare and the Allocation on Resources for Invention[R) NBER,1962, Princeton.
[7]Astley W. and Fombrun C. Collective strategy:Social ecology of organizational environments[J].Academy of Management Review,1983, ISSN 0363-7425,8(4): 576-587.
[8]Audretsch, D. B. and Vivarelli, M. Small Firms and R&D Spillovers:Evidence from Italy[R). CEPR Discussion Paper,1994,927.
[9]Auster E. Macro and strategic perspectives on interorganizational linkages:A comparative analysis and review with suggestions for reorientation[J]. Advances in Strategic Management,1994,ISBN 1559387270,10B:3-40.
[10]Banerjee, Abhijit and Lakshmi Iyer. History, Institutions, and Economic Performance:The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India[R). BREAD work. pap.2003.
[11]Barney J. B..Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management 1991,17,99-129.
[12]Basant, R., Fikkert, B. The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1996,78 (2),187-199.
[13]Basu, Susanto and David Weil. Appropriate Technology and Growth[J]. Quart. J. Econ.1998,113:4, pp.1025-54.
[14]Becker,W. and Peters, J. Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities and innovation[R). Paper presented at The Eighth International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Manchester, July,2000.
[15]Bell, M. and Pavitt, K. Technological accumulation and industrial growth:Contrasts between developed and developing countries[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1993,2,157-209.
[16]Bertalanffy L. General system theory[M].Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General System Theory,1956, ISBN 0807604534,1:1-10.
[17]Biemans, W G. Managing Innovations Within Networks[M]. London:Routledge. 1992.
[18]Block, Z.,& MacMillan, I. Corporate venturing[M]. Cambridge MA:Harvard Business School Press,1993.
[19]Bierly, P. E. and Coombs, J. E. Equity alliances, stages of product development, and alliance instability [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2004, ISSN 0923-4748,21(3):191-214.
[20]Braga, H. and Willmore, L. Technological Imports and Technological Effort:An Analysis of their Determinants in Brazilian Firms[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1991,39 (4),421—432.
[21]Brown, S. L., K. M. Eisenhardt. The art of continuous change:Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations[J]. Admin. Sci. Quart.1997,42,1-34.
[22]Browning, L D, J M Beyer and J C Shetler. Building cooperation in a competitive industry:SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(1),113-151.
[23]Burt, R. Strategic Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[24]Christensen, C. M. The Innovator's Dilemma[M]. HBS Press, Boston, MA.1997.
[25]Clark, K. B., T. Fujimoto. Product Development Performance:Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry[M]. HBS Press,
Cambridge, MA.1991.
[26]Coe, D., and E. Helpman. International R&D Spillovers[J]. European Economic. Review,1995,39, pp.859-887.
[27]Cohen, W. Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change[C]. MA:Blackwell Publishing,1995, pp.182-264.
[28]Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. Innovation and Learning:the two faces of R&D[J]. The Economic Journal,1989,99,569-596.
[29]Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35,128-52.
[30]Daron Acemoglu & Joshua Linn. Market Size in Innovation:Theory and Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry[R). NBER Working Papers,2003,10038.
[31]Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity[J]. Economic Journal,1980,90 (358),266—293.
[32]Demsetz, H. Information and Efficiency:Another Viewpoint[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1969,12,1—22.
[33]Debresson C, Amesse F. Networks of Innovators:A Review and Introduction to the Issue[J]. Research Policy,1991(20):363—379.
[34]De la Fuente, Angel, and Rafael Domenech. Human Capital in Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality Make?[R). CEPR Discussion Paper 2000, No.2466.
[35]Dierickx, I and Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage[J]. Management Science,1989,35:1504-1514.
[36]Dosi, G. Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1988, ⅩⅩⅥ,1120-1171.
[37]Doz Y, Olk P, and Ring P. Formation processes of R&D consortia:which path to take? Where does it lead?[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3),239-266.
[38]Doz, Y. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances:Initial conditions or learning processes?[J] Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(Summer Special issue),55-83.
[39]Dyer, J and K Nobeoka. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(3),345-367.
[40]Easterly, William and Ross Levine. It's Not Factor Accumulation:Stylized Facts and Growth Models[R). World Bank Econ. Rev.2001,15:2, pp.177-219.
[41]Eaton, Jonathan and Samuel Kortum. Trade in Ideas:Patenting and Productivity in the OECD[J]. Int. Econ.1996,40:3-4, pp.251-78.
[42]Edwards, Sebastian. Openness. Productivity and Growth What do We Really Know?[J]. Economic Journal,1998,108,383-398.
[43]Feldman, M. P. Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation[J]. Small Business Economics,1994,Vol.6,pp.363-372.
[44]Foster, R., S. Kaplan. Creative Destruction:Why Companies that Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—And How to Successfully Transform Them[R) Currency, New York.2001.
[45]Francesca Visintin et al. Italian Success and British Survival:Case studies of corporate governance and innovation in a mature industry[J]. Technovation,25 (June 2005),621-629.
[46]Freeman, C. Network of innovators:A synthesis of research issues[J]. Research Policy,1991(20).
[47]Futia, Carl A. Schumpeterian Competition[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,94, No.4 (1980),675-695.
[48]Galbraith J. Designing Complex Organizations[M]. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley. 1973.
[49]Galunic, D. C., K. M. Eisenhardt. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms[J]. Acad. Management.2001,44(6) 1229-1249.
[50]Gemunden, H, T Ritter and P Heydebreck. Network configuration and innovation success:an empirical analysis in German high-tech industries [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing,1996,13(5),449-462.
[51]G.M.Grossman and E.Helpman. Comparative advantage and long run growth[J]. American Economic Review,1990,80:796-815,.
[52]G Padula. Enhancing the innovation performance of firms by balancing cohesiveness and bridging ties[J]. Long Range Planning,2008,41 (4), pp.395-415.
[53]Granovetter, M. Economic Action and Social Structure:the Problem of Embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1985, Vol.91.
[54]Grant, R. M. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue,1996, (17), pp.109-122.
[55]Griffith, Rachel; Stephen Redding, and John Van Reenen. Mapping Two Faces of R&D:Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries[R). forthcoming, Rev. Econ. Statist.2000.
[56]Griliches, Zvi. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth [J]. Bell Journal of Economics,1979,10:92-1161.
[57]Griliches, Zvi. R&D and Productivity Econometric Results and Measurement Issues, in P. Stoneman, (ed.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change[M]. Oxford:Blackwell.1995.
[58]Grossman, Gene, and Helpman Elhanan. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.1991.
[59]Guare J. Six Degree of Separation:A Play [M). New York:Vintage Books,1990.
[60]Gulati, R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice of alliances [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(1), 85-112.
[61]Gulati, R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998, ISSN 0143-2095,19(4):293-317.
[62]Guo,Bin. Technology acquisition channels and industry performance:An industry-level analysis of Chinese large-and medium-size manufacturing enterprises[J]. Research Policy 2008,37,194-209.
[63]Guth, W. D.,& Ginsberg, A. Guest editors' Introduction:Corporate entrepreneurship[J].Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:5-15.
[64]Hagedoorn, J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993, ISSN 0143-2095,14(5):371-385.
[65]Hall, B. H. and J. Mairesse. Exploring the Relationship Between R&D and Pro-ductivity in French Manufacturing Firms[R). NBER Working Paper, No. (1992),3956.
[66]Hall, Robert and Charles Jones. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?[J]. Quart. J. Econ.1999,114:1, pp.83-116.
[67]Harrigan, K. Strategies for Joint Ventures[M]. Lexington, MA:Lexington Books, (1985) ISBN 0669104485.
[68]Heikkinen M, Tahtinen J. Managed formation process of a R&D network[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management (2006)10:271-298.
[69]Hellstrom, T andMJacob. Evaluating and managing the performance of universityindustry partnership:from central rule to dynamic research networks [J]. Evaluation,1999,5(3),330-339.
[70]Henderson, R., K. B. Clark. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Admin. Sci. Quart.1990,35(1) 9-30.
[71]Hennart, J. F. A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal, (1988) ISSN 0143-2095,9:361-376.
[72]Holmes, Thomas J., and James Schmitz. A Gain From Trade From Unproductive to Productive Entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2001,47, 417-446.
[73]Iansiti, M., West, J. Technology Integration: turning great research into great products[J]. HBR May-June 1997.
[74]Hipkinand and P. Naude. Developing effective alliance partnerships:lessons from a case study[J].Long Range Planning,2006,39(1),51e69.
[75]Hollanders, H., ter Weel, B. Technology, knowledge spillovers and changes in employment structure:evidence from six OECD countries[J]. Labour Economics,2002,9,579-599.
[76]Howitt, Peter. Endogenous Growth and Cross-Country Income Differences [J]. Amer. Econ Rev.2000,90:4, pp.829-46.
[77]Hu, A.G. and Jefferson, G.H. Returns to Research and Development in Chinese Industry: Evidence from State-owned Enterprises in Beijing. China Economic Review,2004, Vol.15, No.1, pp.86-107.
[78]Hu,A.G, Jefferson,G. H., Qian Jinchang. R&D and technology transfer: firm-level evidence from Chinese industry[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,2005,87(4),
780-786.
[79]Imai, K. and Itami, H..Interpretation of organization and Market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, (1984) ISSN 0167-7187,2:285-310.
[80]Jacobs, M.T. Short-term America: The causes and cures of our business myopia[M].Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.1991.
[81]Jaffe, A.B. Real effects of Academic Research [J], American Economic Review. 1989,79 (5):957-9701.
[82]J. Carlos Fdez. de Arroyabe & Nieves Arranz. Management in R&D networks as complex systems:The case of European networks[J]. E:CO Issue 2006,Vol.8 No.3 pp.24-39.
[83]J.C. Spender. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17,Winter pp45-62
[84]Jefferson, G.H., Bai Huamao, Guan Xiaojing,Yu Xiaoyun. R&D performance in Chinese industry[R). Graduate School of International Economics and Finance, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA,2002.
[85]Jian Tong. High-tech and High Capability in a Growth Model[J]. International Economic Review,2005,46 (1),215-243.
[86]Joglekar, P., Bohl, A.H. and Hamburg, M. Comments on Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm[J]. Management Science, (1997),43(10),1455-62.
[87]Jones, O, S Conway and F Steward. Introduction: social interaction and innovation networks[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,1998,2(2),123-136.
[88]Johnson, R., Hoskisson. R.,& Hitt, M. Board of director involvement in restructuring: The effect importance of board versus managerial controls and characteristics[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(special issue):33-51.
[89]Jones. G.,& Butler. J. Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship:An agency theory perspective [J]. Journal of Management,1992,18:733-749.
[90]Jones, O, S Conway and F Steward. Introduction:social interaction and innovation networks[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,1998,2(2),123-136.
[91]J. S. Coleman. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology 1988,94(Suppl),S95eS120.
[92]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. Market Structure,Elasticity of Demand and Incentive to Invent[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1970,13,241—252.
[93]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Timing of Innovations under Rivalry[J]. Econometrica,1972,40,43—60.
[94]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Patent Life and R&D Rivalry[J]. American Economic Review,1974,64,183—187.
[95]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. On the Degree of Rivalry for Maximum Innovative Activity[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1976,90,245—260.
[96]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. Self financing of an R&D Project[J]. American Economic Review,1978a,68,252—261.
[97]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Potential Rivalry, Monopoly Profits and the Pace of Inventive Activity [J]. Review of Economic Studies,1978b,45,547—557.
[98]Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. Market Structure and Innovation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1982.
[99]Kang, M. H. Economic Concentration and Innovation[J]. Kyong-Je-Hak-Yon-Gu, 1994, Vol.41, pp.3-25.
[100]Kim, B. M. The Relationship between R & D and Firm Size in the Raw Material Synthetic Industry in Korea[J]. The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, 1992, Vol.1, pp.85-104.
[101]Kleinknecht, A. and Reijnen, J.O.N. Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study[J]. Research Policy, (1992) 21,347-60.
[102]Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. On the Sources and Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities [J]. Research Policy,1995, 24,185-205.
[103]Kok, R, B Hillebrand and W Biemans. What makes product development market oriented? Toward conceptual framework[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2003,7(2),137-162.
[104]Kogut, B.. Joint ventures:Theoretical and empirical perspectives [J]. Strategic Management Journal, (1988) ISSN 0143-2095,9:319-332.
[105]Kuratko. D. F.. Montagno. R. V., & Hornsby. J. S. Developing an entrepreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:49-58.
[106]Lall, S. Technological capabilities and industrialization.World Development[J]. (1992)20,165-86.
[107]Lawler, EJ and J Yoon. Power and the emergence of commitment behaviour in negotiated exchange[J]. American Sociological Review,1993,58(4),456-481.
[108]Lawrence, P.R. "The Harvard Organization:An environment research program,"in Van der Ven y Joice (eds.), Perspectives on Organization:Design and Behavior[M]. New York:John Wiley, (1981).ISBN 0471093580.
[109]Lee, C-Y. A new perspective on industry R&D and market structure[J]. Journal of Industrial. Economics 2005,53:101-22.
[110]Levin, R. C., Cohen, W. M. and Mowery, D. C. R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure:New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses [J]. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings,1985,75(2),20—24.
[111]Liu, X., White, R.S. The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries[J]. Technovation,1997, 17(3),119-125.
[112]Liu, Z. Foreign direct investment and technology spillover:evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2002,30,579-602.
[113]Loury, G. C. Market Structure and Innovation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979,93,395—410.
[114]Love, J. and Roper, S. The Determinants of Innovation:R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects[J]. Review of Industrial Organization,1999,Vol.15, pp. 43-64.
[115]Lucas, RE, Jr. On the Mechanics of Economic Development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics (1988)22:3-42.
[116]Lumpkin, G. T.,& Dess, G. G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996,21: 135-172.
[117]Lundvall, B. A. and Johnson, B. Promoting Innovation Systems as a Response to the Globalising Learning Economy[R). Draft of Contribution to the project Local Productive Clusters and Innovations Systems in Brazil:New industrial and technological policies. Setembro. Rio de Janeiro. Brazil,2000.
[118]MacPherson, A. D. A Comparison of Within-firm and External Sources of Product Innovation[J].Growth and Change,1997,Vol.28, pp.289-308.
[119]Michael J. Boskin and Lawrence J. Lau. Generalized Solow—Neutral Technical Progress and Postwar Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper.2000.
[120]Malatesta, P.,& Walling, R. Poison pill securities:Stockholder wealth profitability and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1988,20:374-376.
[121]Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, (1993)2,45-71.
[122]Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,1997,6(1),83-117.
[123]Mankiw, Nicholas G, David, Romer, and David Weil. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1992,107, 407-437.
[124]McLoughlin, I, C Koch and K Dickson. What's this "tosh"? Innovation networks and new product development as a political process[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2001,5(3),275-298.
[125]Metcalfe, S., Ramlogan, R. Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (2007), doi:10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021
[126]M. Gargiulo and M. Benassi. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes and the adaptation of social capital[J]. Organization Science (2000)11(2),183e196.
[127]Michael Tushman and David Nadler. organizing for innovation. California Management Review.1986, Volume ⅩⅩⅩⅧ(3).
[128]Mitsuru Kodama. Knowledge Creation through Networked Strategic Communities-Case Studies on New Product Development in Japanese Companies. Long Range Planning,2005,38, pp.27-49.
[129]Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. Characteristics of partnership success:Partnership attributes, communication, behavior, and conflict resolution techniques[J]. Strategic Management Journal, (1994)ISSN 0143-2095,15:135-152.
[130]Mytelka, L. Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy[J]. Industry and Innovation, (2000)7(1),15-32.
[131]Nahapiet,J., and S. Ghoshal. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, (1998),Vol.23, No.2,242-266.
[132]Nelson, R. R. and G. Wright. The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,,1992,30(4):1931-1964.
[133]Nelson, Richard and Edmunds Phelps. Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth[J]. Amer. Econ. Rev.1966,56:2, pp.69-75.
[134]Nelson, R. and Winter, S. In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation[J]. Research Policy, (1977)6,36-76.
[135]Nelson, R. and Winter, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change[M]. Harvard US:Harvard University Press,1982.
[136]Nobelius, D. Towards the sixth generation of R&D management[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2005,22(5),369-375.
[137]Oltra, Maria J. and Flor, Marisa. The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Innovative Capabilities on Firms' Output Innovation[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.12, pp.137-144, September 2003.
[138]Palmberg, C. The sources of innovations—Looking beyond technological opportunities[J]. Econ. Innov. New Techn.,2004,13 (2), pp.183-197.
[139]Parente, Stephen, and Edward C. Prescott. Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1994,102(2),298-321.
[140]Paul Romer. Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy.,1986,Vol.94, No.5. pp.1002-1037.
[141]Paul Romer. Growth Based on lnereasing Returns Due to Specialization[J]. American Eeonomie Review,1987,77,2 (may), pp.56-62.
[142]Paul Romer. Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History and the Orgins of Modern. Economic Growth[J]. American Economic Review (May,1996) pp.202-206.
[143]Paul Romer. Endogenous Technological Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98(5):71-102.
[144]Paul M. Romer. Idea Gaps and Object Gaps in Economic Development[J]. Journal of. Monetary Economics 32 (December 1993):543-73.
[145]Pavitt, K. Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change-Towards a Taxonomy and Theory[J]. Research Policy, (1984)13,343-373.
[146]Penrose, E. T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm[M]. Basil Blackwell, London, UK,1959.
[147]Peters, L, P Groenowegen and N Fiebelkorm. A comparison of networks between industry and public sector research in materials technology and biotechnology[J]. Research Policy, (1998)27(3),255-271.
[148]Pissarides, Chris. Economic Growth:How Much Does Education Count?[R) CentrePiece,3,London; CEP, London School of Economics.1996.
[149]Porter, M. E. Competitive Advantage[M]. New York, NY:Free Press, (1985).ISBN 068481460.
[150]Porter, M, E. Capital disadvantage:America's failing capital investment system[J]. Harvard Business Review,1992,70:65-82.
[151]Prescott, Edward. Needed A Theory of Total Factor Productivity[J]. Int. Econ. Rev. 1998,39:3, pp.525-51.
[152]Pritchett, Lant. Where Has All the Education Gone?[J]. World Bank Economic Review.2001,15(3),367-391.
[153]Ramirez, P., Tylecote, A. Hybrid Corporate Governance and Its Effects on Innovation:A Case Study of AstraZeneca[R). Sheffield University, Mimeo,2003.
[154]Rana Hasan. The impact of imported and domestic technologies on the productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing firms [R). East-West Center Working Papers, 2000, Economics Series, No.6.
[155]Raut L.K. R&D Spillover and Productivity Growth:Evidence from Indian Private Firms[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1995, (48):1—23.
[156]R.E. Lucas. Making a Miracle[J]. Econometrica,1993,61,251-72
[157]Ryu, S. H. Analyzing the Determinants of Company R D Investment:Using & a Semi-parametric Estimation Method[J]. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society,2003, Vol.6, pp.279-297.
[158]Rice, M. P., G. C. O'Connor, R. Leifer, C. M. McDermott, T.Standish-Kuon. Corporate venture capital models for promoting radical innovation[J]. Marketing Theory Practice,2000,8(3)1-10.
[159]Ring, P and AH Van de Ven. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, (1994)13(1), 90-119.
[160]Ritter, T and HG Gemunden. Network competence:its impact on innovation success and its antecedents[J]. Journal of Business Research, (2003)56(9), 745-755.
[161]Ritter, T, I Wilkinson and W Johnston. Managing in complex business networks [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, (2004)33(3),175-183.
[162]Rivera-Batiz, Luis and Paul Romer. Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth[J]. Quart. J. Econ.1991,106:2, pp.531-55.
[163]Roberts, E. B. and Mizouchi, R. Interfirm technological collaboration:The case of Japanese biotechnology [J]. Technology Management, (1989) ISSN 0895-6308, 4(1):43-61.
[164]Roe, M. J. Strong managers, weak owners[M]. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press,1994.
[165]Rosenberg, N. Technological change in the machine tool industry,1840-1910[J]. Journal of Economic History, (1963) Vol.4 pp.414-443.
[166]Rosenberg, N. Inside the Black Box:Technology and Economics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1982.
[167]Rosenberg, N. Science and Technology in the Twentieth Century. In Dosi, G, Giannetti, R. and Toninelli, P.(eds.) Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective. Oxford:Claredon Press,1992.
[168]Rothwell, R. Towards the fifth generation innovation process[J]. International Market Review, (1994) ISSN 0265-1335,22(3):56-75.
[169]Rothwell, R. The Characteristics of Successful. Innovators and Technically Progressive Firms[J]. R&D. Management,1977,7(3), pp.191-206.
[170]Sakakibara, M. Formation of R&D consortia:industry and company effects[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(11),1033-1050.
[171]Sanjaya lall. reinventing industrial strategy:the role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. Paper prepared for The Intergovernmental Group on Monetary Affairs and Development (G-24), UNCTAD, Geneva,2003.
[172]Saxenian, A. L. Regional Advantage:Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and. Route 128[J]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1994.
[173]Scherer, F. M. Research and Development Resource Allocation under Rivalry[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1967a,81 (3),359—394.
[174]Scherer, F.M. Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers[J]. American Economic Review,1967b,57(3),524—531.
[175]Scherer,F.M. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance[M]. Second Edition, Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1980.
[176]Scherer, Frederic M. Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1982,64,627-634.
[177]Scherer, F. M. and Ross, D. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston:Houghton-Mifflin.1990.
[178]Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York:Harper.1942.
[179]S.Conway and F. Steward. Networks and interfaces in environmental innovation:a comparative study in the UK and Germany[J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research (1998), pp.239-254.
[180]Scott, J. T. Firm Versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity. in Griliches, Z. (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1984.
[181]Shiue, Carol H. and Wolfgang Keller. Markets in China and Europe on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution. CEPR discus. pap.4420,2004.
[182]Siggelkow, N., D. A. Levinthal. Temporarily divide to conquer:Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation[J]. Organ. Sci.2003,14(6) 650-669.
[183]Smith,W.K., Tushman, M. L. Managing strategic contradictions:a top management model for managing innovation streams[J]. Organ. Sci.2005,16(5) 522-536.
[184]Soete, L. L. G.. Firm Size and Innovation Activity[J]. European Economic Review, 1979,12,319—340.
[185]Sokoloff, Kenneth L. Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America:Evidence from Patent Records[J]. Journal of Economic History 1988,48(4):813-850.
[186]Solow, Robert. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1957,39:312-320.
[187]Sterlacchini, A. Technological opportunities, intraindustry spillovers and firm R&D intensity[J]. Economic Innovation and New Technology,(1994) 3,123-37.
[188]Stopford, f, M, & Baden-Fuller, C. Creating corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:521-536.
[189]Stokey, Nancy L. Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New. Goods[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1988,96,701-717.
[190]Stokey, Nancy. The Volume and Composition of Trade Between Rich and Poor Countries[J]. Review of. Economic Studies,1991,58,63-84.
[191]Sung, T. K. Firm Characteristics and Innovative Activity: With Special Reference to Schumpeterian Hypothesis[J]. The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, (2001), Vol.9, pp.133-155.
[192]Sung, T. K. A Firm Size-Innovative Activity Relationship:An Empirical Study of the Korean Manufacturing Industry[J]. The Korean Small Business Review, 2003,Vol.25, pp.305-325.
[193]Sung, T. K. and Carlsson, B. The Evolution of a Technological System:The Case of CNC Machine Tools in Korea[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2003, Vol. 13, pp.435-460.
[194]Sung, T. and Carlsson, B. Network Effects, Technological Opportunity, and Innovation:Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Firms[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation (2007),15,1.
[195]Sutton, J. Technology and Market Structure[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1998.
[196]Tirole, Jean. Corporate Governance[J]. Econometrica, Econometric Society, 2001,vol.69(1), pages 1-35,
[197]Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[R). Oxford University Press,2000.
[198]Temple, Jonathan. Generalizations That Aren't? Evidence on Education and Growth[J]. European Economic Review,2001,45,905-918.
[199]Tidd, J. and Trewhella, M. Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning[J]. R&D Management, (1997), ISSN 0033-6807,27(4):359-375.
[200]Tushman, M. L., C. A. O'Reilly. Ambidextrous organizations:managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review.1996, 38(4).
[201]Tylecote, A., Conesa, E. Corporate governance, innovation systems and industrial performance[J]. Industry and Innovation,1999,6(1),25-50.
[202]Veugelers, R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing[J]. Research Policy, (1997) 26,303-315.
[203]Walker, G. and Weber, D. A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, (1984) ISSN 0001-8392,29(2):373-391.
[204]Watts D J, Strongatz S H. Collective Dynamics of'Small World' Networks [J]. Nature,1998,393:440-44.
[205]W.Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne. Strategy,Value Innovation,and the Knowledge Economy[J]. Sloan Management Review Spring 1999.
[206]W.C. Kim and R. Mauborgne. Value Innovation:The Strategic Logic of High Growth[J]. Harvard Business Review, July-August 2004.
[207]Wernerfelt, B. A resource based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984,5, pp.171-180.
[208]Westerman, G. et al. organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle[J]. Organ. Sci.2006,17(2) 230-238.
[209]William L. Miller. Innovation rules[J]. Research Technology Management March-April 2006
[210]Williamson, O. E. The theory of the firm as a governance structure:From choice to contract[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, (2002)ISSN 0895-3309,16(3): 171-196.
[211]Wolfgang Keller. International Technology Diffusion[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2004, vol.42(3), pages 752-782.
[212]Woolcock, M. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework[J]. Theory and Society, (1998), No.2, Vol.27, pp. 151-207.
[213]Yasemin Y. Kor.,Joseph T. Mahoney. Penrose's Resouce-Based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity [J]. Journal of Management Studies 37:1 January 2000 0022-2380.
[214]Yasemin Y. Kor.,Joseph T. Mahoney. Edith Penrose's (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management[J]. Journal of Management Studies 41:1 January 2004 0022-2380.
[215]Zahra,S.A.Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39 (6), pp.1713-1735.
[216]安同良,施浩和Alcorta.中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证——基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析[J].经济研究,2006(2)
[217]本.斯泰尔等编.技术创新与经济绩效[M].上海人民出版社,2006
[218]成思危.也谈技术创新的三种类型.中国知识产权局网站。
[219]陈柳钦.产业集群技术创新环境论综述[J].南都学坛,2007(02)
[220]陈仲常,余翔.企业研发投入的外部环境影响因素研究—基于产业层面的面板数据分析[J].科研管理,2007(2)
[221]樊霞,朱桂龙.基于小世界模型的企业创新网络研究[J].软科学,2008,22(1)
[222]冯锋,王亮.产学研合作创新网络培育机制分析——基于小世界网络模型[J].中国软科学,2008(11)
[223]冯梅.我国装备制造业技术进步研究：1996—2006[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2008(2)
[224]符平.“嵌入性”：两种取向及其分歧[J].社会学研究,2009(5)
[225]高梁.破除比较优势迷信,以自主技术强国.网上材料
[226]郭克莎.对中国外贸战略与贸易政策的评论[J].国际经济评论,2003(9)
[227]郭振军,汪建成.基于技术引进、消化吸收的自主创新路径研究——广日电梯自主集成创新能力的形成与演进[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(3)
[228]华民.比较优势、自主创新、经济增长和收入分配——何为中国未来经济发展之道路?[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2007(5)
[229]黄烨菁.开放条件下的技术进步——从技术引进到自主创新[J].世界经济研究,2008(6)
[230]“技术创新研究”课题组.中国企业技术创新政策基础及实证研究[J].管理世界,1996(2)：123-132
[231]林毅夫,孙希芳.经济发展的比较优势战略理论——兼评《对中国外贸战略与 贸易政策的评论》[J].国际经济评论,2003,11—12
[232]林毅夫,张鹏飞.适宜技术、技术选择和发展中国家的经济增长[EB／OL].北京大学中国.经济研究中心讨论稿,2005
[233]马龙龙.流通产业组织[M].清华大学出版社,2006
[234]迈克尔.波特著,陈小悦译.竞争优势[M].华夏出版社,1997
[235]马西莫·莫塔著,沈国华译.竞争政策—理论与实践[M].上海财经大学出版社,2006
[236]上海市经济委员会、上海科学技术情报研究所编著.2008年版：世界制造业重点行业发展动态[M].上海科学技术文献出版社,2008
[237]上海申银万国.2020年的中国装备制造业研究报告[R].网上材料
[238]王国跃等.技术引进的日韩模式分析及我国发展战略[J].对外经济贸易大学学报2005(1)
[239]魏杰.中国经济之变局[M].中国发展出版社,2009
[240]翁华强,郭凤典和管名.中国汽车业自主创新路径之探讨[J].特区经济,2004.(12)。
[241]吴延兵.R&D、创新与生产率——中国工业产业的经验证据[D).2006年中国社会科学院研究生院博士学位论文。
[242]吴延兵.中国工业创新水平及影响因素[J].产业经济评论,2006,5(2)
[243]吴延兵.企业规模、市场力量与创新：一个文献综述[J].经济研究,2007(5)
[244]徐建平、夏国平.我国装备制造业的国际比较及对策研究[J].中国机械工程,2008(20)
[245]阎莉.日本技术引进成功经验探析[J].日本研究,2008(2)
[246]张富春.企业集团组织导论[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1998
[247]张国宝.装备制造业的自主创新问题[EB／OL].中央政府门户网站：www.gov.cn
[248]周黎安,罗凯.企业规模与创新：来自中国省级水平的经验证据[J].经济学(季刊),2005,4(3)
[249]朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响[J].经济研究,2003(6)：45-53
[250]左大培.绕过比较优势“陷阱”,以技术立国.网上材料