用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同酵母酒精发酵中乙醛产量特征及影响因素的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
二氧化硫(SO_2)因存在诸多健康问题日益引起人们的忧虑,减少SO_2的使用量已成为现代葡萄酒酿造学的一个重要目标。然而,葡萄酒中的乙醛可与游离SO_2稳定结合,降低SO_2抗微生物、抗氧化的效果,导致需要添加更多的SO_2以维持葡萄酒的稳定性。论文从酵母菌株的选择和应用出发,在模式体系和葡萄汁发酵中研究不同酵母菌株酒精发酵过程中生成、代谢乙醛的能力,研究发酵速率和SO_2终止发酵等因素对葡萄酒相关酵母乙醛生成的影响,旨在降低葡萄酒中乙醛的含量,为葡萄酒生产中减少SO_2的添加量提供依据。主要研究结果如下:
     1.以酵母静息细胞的悬浮液作为模式体系,研究26株葡萄酒相关酵母生成、代谢乙醛的能力。结果表明:所有酵母菌株在发酵过程中乙醛含量均呈现出先增加后降低的变化趋势,但不同菌株乙醛生成的动态特征及发酵中乙醛含量的最大值(峰值)不同。其中,各酵母菌株在发酵初期乙醛的产量系数(代谢单位还原糖而产生乙醛的量,单位mg/g)与发酵中乙醛的峰值显著相关(r2=0.92),26株酵母在模式体系下乙醛的产量系数在0.4-42 mg/g之间,乙醛峰值的范围为2.2-189.4 mg/L。在该模式体系下,粟酒裂殖酵母(Schizosaccharomyces pombe)的乙醛产量系数和峰值最高,其它非酿酒酵母的乙醛产量系数和峰值均显著低于酿酒酵母(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)。发酵初期添加SO_2增加所有酵母菌株的乙醛产量系数和峰值,其中非酿酒酵母的增加值小于酿酒酵母。所有酵母静息细胞在不添加葡萄糖时,均可代谢外源添加的乙醛,其中粟酒裂殖酵母的代谢速率最小,但各菌株静息细胞代谢外源乙醛的速率和发酵中乙醛的产量系数不相关。
     2.在霞多丽葡萄酒酿造过程中研究26株葡萄酒相关酵母乙醛生成量的动态变化。结果表明:各酵母菌株在发酵初期乙醛生成量迅速增加,当酵母生长至对数期末期时乙醛生成量达最大值,随后发酵葡萄汁中乙醛含量迅速降低。各菌株在发酵初期乙醛的生成速率与峰值过后乙醛的代谢速率显著正相关(r=0.83)。26株酵母乙醛产量系数的范围为0.13-4.4 mg/g,乙醛峰值的范围为9-129 mg/L,发酵结束时不同酵母菌株酿造葡萄酒中乙醛的残留量在2-64 mg/L之间。粟酒裂殖酵母的乙醛产量系数、峰值和残留量均最高,酿酒酵母居中,其它非酿酒酵母最低。发酵前添加SO_2增加了葡萄酒中乙醛的含量,各酵母菌株乙醛含量的增加范围为217-531μg/mg SO_2,平均增加值为325±17μg/mg SO_2。将葡萄汁发酵和模式体系发酵对比发现,两种发酵体系中各酵母菌株乙醛产量系数和峰值均线性相关。
     3.迟缓发酵在葡萄酒生产中很难预测,试验研究了6株酿酒酵母在霞多丽葡萄汁中快速和迟缓发酵时乙醛生成量的动态变化。结果表明:迟缓发酵时各酵母菌株乙醛产量系数和葡萄酒中乙醛含量均高于快速发酵。其中,迟缓发酵时各菌株乙醛产量系数的平均值为1.59±0.21 mg/g,快速发酵时各菌株乙醛产量系数的平均值为0.95±0.10 mg/g。发酵前不添加SO_2时,2株酵母(EC1118和E1219)快速发酵和迟缓发酵时乙醛产量系数的差异达显著性,添加50 mg/L SO_2时,5株酵母(CY3079、DV10、EC1118、A709和E1219)的差异达显著性(p<0.05)。测量不同酵母菌株发酵初期乙醛的产量系数有可能用于预测酒精发酵是否迟滞。
     4.发酵中添加SO_2抑制酒精发酵常用于生产甜葡萄酒,试验在霞多丽葡萄汁发酵中添加不同浓度的SO_2并结合低温处理,研究中途抑制发酵对2株酿酒酵母(CY3079和EC1118)代谢还原糖并生成乙醛的影响。结果表明:添加大于150 mg/L SO_2可显著抑制酵母糖代谢,不同浓度SO_2处理均提高酵母乙醛的生成量,但提高幅度与SO_2的添加量成反比。本试验中使用不同浓度的SO_2抑制发酵15 d后,各处理葡萄酒中乙醛含量低于79 mg/L,小于葡萄酒中乙醛的嗅觉阈值。
     5.通过研究8株酿酒酵母在霞多丽葡萄汁发酵过程中其它三种主要SO_2结合物丙酮酸、α-酮戊二酸和2-丁醇-3-酮含量的动态变化,并结合各菌株乙醛产量的研究结果,对不同酵母菌株发酵葡萄酒结合游离SO_2的能力进行计算。结果表明:酵母菌株显著影响葡萄酒中SO_2结合物的含量。商业酵母EC1118酿造的霞多丽葡萄酒中,SO_2结合物的总量最低,本土筛选菌株E1219酿造葡萄酒中SO_2结合物的总量最高。以葡萄酒中游离SO_2水平需达到50 mg/L为例,EC1118酿造的葡萄酒中需要加入的SO_2总量不应低于89 mg/L,而E1219酿造的葡萄酒中需要添加的SO_2总量不低于120 mg/L,是前者的1.34倍。因此,在酵母菌株筛选研究及葡萄酒生产中,可将不同菌株产乙醛等SO_2结合物的能力作为重要的参考指标。
The reduction of SO_2 concentrations in wine is a primary objective because of regulatory pressure or consumer concerns with regards to asthma or allergic reactions. Several wine constituents may bind to SO_2, acetaldehyde (ethanal) typically being the most important because of its quantity and binding power. This research evaluated the ability of 26 yeast strains, including Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces strains and commercial starters to form and degrade acetaldehyde in a model medium and during grape must vinifications. The effect of fermentation vigor was considered as well as yeast response to SO_2 additions at different fermentation stages. Specifically, the effect of using SO_2 to stop alcoholic fermentation with the aim of achieving wines with residual sugar was compared with cooling. In addition, the ability of production other SO_2 binders by 8 S. cerevisiae was investigated in grape must fermentation with the aim of calculation bound SO_2 concentrations in different wines. The major results were summarized as following.
     1 Acetaldehyde metabolism of 26 yeast strains was evaluated in a reproducible resting cell model system. Acetaldehyde kinetics and peak values were highly genus, species, and strain dependent. Peak acetaldehyde values varied from 2.2 to 189.4 mg/L and correlated well (r2 = 0.92) with the acetaldehyde production yield coefficients that ranged from 0.4 to 42 mg acetaldehyde per g of glucose. S. pombe showed the highest acetaldehyde production yield coefficients and peak values. All other non-Saccharomyces species produced significantly less acetaldehyde than the S. cerevisiae strains and were less affected by SO_2 additions. All yeast strains could degrade acetaldehyde as sole substrate, but the acetaldehyde degradation rates did not correlate with acetaldehyde peak values or acetaldehyde production yield coefficients in incubations with glucose as sole substrate.
     2. In addition, acetaldehyde production property of 26 enological yeast strains was investigated in a natural grape must. All yeast strains led to uniform kinetics where acetaldehyde reached an initial peak value at the beginning of fermentation followed by partial reutilization. Peak acetaldehyde values and final concentrations in wine ranged from 9 to 129 mg/L and 2 to 64 mg/L, respectively. Acetaldehyde production yield coefficient at the beginning of alcoholic fermentation was found to be yeast strain specific and can be used as a discriminating factor between yeast strains. Initial addition of SO_2 led to higher acetaldehyde concentrations throughout the fermentation and the extent of increases at final values in wine was highly strain dependent, which ranged from 217-531μg acetaldehyde per mg of SO_2 addition. Compared with previous work reported in resting cell system, acetaldehyde yield coefficients calculated as acetaldehyde produced per sugar degraded of 26 yeast strains were also correlated with the values in grape must fermentation and could be used as a criteria to discriminate among yeast.
     3. In wine making, slow or sluggish alcoholic fermentations still occur frequently and is difficult to predict. Acetaldehyde kinetics of 6 S. cerevisiae strains at different fermentation speed was studied in Chardonnay wine vinification. By comparison with fast fermentations, sluggish fermentations led to higher acetaldehyde yield coefficient as well as final concentrations in wine. The average value of acetaldehyde yield coefficient was 1.59±0.21 mg acetaldehyde per g of sugar for sluggish fermentations, but 0.95±0.10 mg acetaldehyde per g of sugar for fast fermentations. The significance was evidenced in 2 strains (EC1118 and E1219) in absence of SO_2 and 5 strains (CY3079, DV10, EC1118, A709 and E1219) with 50 mg/L SO_2 addition.
     4. The effect of using SO_2 to stop alcoholic fermentation on acetaldehyde production was also studied. Sugar metabolism was stopped with over 150 mg/L SO_2 addition and acetaldehyde production was increased with any SO_2 addition during fermentations. Acetaldehyde formation rate after the time-point of SO_2 adding was decreased as the increase of SO_2 dosage. However, final acetaldehyde concentration was below 79 mg/L in all wines, which did not over the acetaldehyde threshold in wines.
     5. Concentrations of other SO_2 binders as pyruvate,α-ketoglutaric acid and acetoin were studied throughout Chardonnay wine fermentation. Pyruvate and acetoin had similar kinetics with acetaldehyde during alcoholic fermentation. The amount of bound SO_2 in wines was yeast strain dependent. As calculated by three major binders, wine made with yeast strain EC1118 required at least 89 mg/L total SO_2 addition to reach a free SO_2 concentration of 50 mg/L, while wine made with yeast strain E1219 needed at least 120 mg/L total SO_2 addition, which was 1.34 fold higher.
引文
郭安鹊. 2007.葡萄酒氧化褐变的机制及二氧化硫抗氧化替代物的研究. [博士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学
    李华. 2000.现代葡萄酒工艺学.西安:陕西人民出版社
    李艳,牟德华. 2007.中途抑制发酵法制备葡萄酒的研究.酿酒科技(06): 107-110.
    秦丽娜. 2008.酿酒酵母乙醇脱氢酶Ⅰ基因的超表达. [硕士学位论文].福州:福建师范大学
    王丹,张强,李旺,戚南昌,郭春晓,杨志荣,张杰. 2011.酵母静息细胞催化丙酮酸乙酯不对称还原制(S)-乳酸乙酯.催化学报(06): 1035-1039.
    王清章. 1999.食品中的酶促褐变与防止进展.冷藏技术(01): 15-17
    魏运平译. 2003.葡萄酒酿造中乙醛的形成及其重要作用.酿酒科技(02): 77-78.
    朱碧云,李浩明. 2010.丙酮酸脱羧酶及其应用研究.生命科学(11): 1184-1191.
    Alexandre H, Blanchet S and Charpentier C. 2000. Identification of a 49-kDa hydrophobic cell wall mannoprotein present in velum yeast which may be implicated in velum formation. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 185(2): 147-150.
    Anonymous. 2009. The maximum sulphur dioxide content of wines. Official Journal of the European Union, L193 Annex I B: 26-29.
    Bakker BM, Bro C, Kotter P, Luttik MaH, Van Dijken JP and Pronk JT. 2000. The mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase adh3p is involved in a redox shuttle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bacteriology, 182(17): 4730-4737.
    Bakker J, Bridle P, Bellworthy SJ, Garcia-Viguera C, Reader HP and Watkins SJ. 1998. Effect of sulphur dioxide and must extraction on colour, phenolic composition and sensory quality of red table wine. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 78: 297-307.
    Bakker J, Preston NW and Timberlake CF. 1986. The deternination of anthocyanins in aging red wines-comparison of HPLC and spectra methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 37(2): 121-126.
    Barbe JC, De Revel G, Joyeux A, Lonvaud-Funel A and Bertrand A. 2000. Role of carbonyl compounds in SO_2 binding phenomena in musts and wines from botrytized grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(8): 3413-3419.
    Bartowsky EJ and Henschke PA. 2008. Acetic acid bacteria spoilage of bottled red wine - A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 125(1): 60-70.
    Beier DR, Sledziewski A and Young ET. 1985. Deletion analysis identifies a region, upstream of the ADH2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is required for ADR1-mediated derepression. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 5(7): 1743-1749.
    Bely M, Sablayrolles JM and Barre P. 1990. Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 70(4): 246-252.
    Bely M, Stoeckle P, Masneuf-Pomarede I and Dubourdieu D. 2008. Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii - Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 122(3): 312-320.
    Bird AJ, Gordon M, Eide DJ and Winge DR. 2006. Repression of ADH1 and ADH3 during zinc deficiency by Zap1-induced intergenic RNA transcripts. EMBO Journal, 25(24): 5726-5734.
    Bisson LF. 1999. Stuck and sluggish fermentations. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 50(1): 107-119.
    Boulton RB, Singleton VL, Bisson LF and Kunkee RE. 1996. Principles and Practices of Winemaking. New York: Chapman & Hall
    Buono MA and Erickson LE. 1985. Rapid measurement of Candida utilis dry-weight with microwave drying. Journal of Food Protection, 48(11): 958-960.
    Burroughs LF and Sparks AH. 1964. The identification of sulphur dioxide-binding compounds in apple juices and ciders. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 15: 176-185.
    Burroughs LF and Sparks AH. 1973a. Sulphite-binding power of wines and ciders. I. Equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonyl bisulphite compounds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 24(2): 187-198.
    Burroughs LF and Sparks AH. 1973b. Sulphite-binding power of wines and ciders. II. Theoretical consideration and calculation of sulphite-binding equilibria. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 24(2): 199-206.
    Burroughs LF and Sparks AH. 1973c. Sulphite-binding power of wines and ciders. III. Determination of carbonyl compounds in a wine and calculation of its sulphite-binding power. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 24: 207-217.
    Cabranes C, Moreno J and Mangas JJ. 1998. Cider production with immobilized Leuconostoc oenos Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 104: 127-130.
    Cambon B, Monteil V, Remize F, Camarasa C and Dequin S. 2006. Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(7): 4688-4694.
    Cheng G, Shi YL, Sturla SJ, Jalas JR, Mcintee EJ, Villalta PW, Wang MY and Hecht SS. 2003. Reactions of formaldehyde plus acetaldehyde with deoxyguanosine and DNA: Formation of cyclic deoxyguanosine adducts and formaldehyde cross-links. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 16(2): 145-152.
    Cheraiti N, Guezenec S and Salmon JM. 2005. Redox interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum in mixed culture under enological conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(1): 255-260.
    Cheraiti N, Guezenec S and Salmon JM. 2010. Very early acetaldehyde production by industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: a new intrinsic character. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 86(2): 693-700.
    Cheraiti N, Sauvage FX and Salmon JM. 2008. Acetaldehyde addition throughout the growth phase alleviates the phenotypic effect of zinc deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 77(5): 1093-1109.
    Cheynier V, Doco T, Fulcrand H, Guyot S, Le Roux E, Souquet JM, Rigaud J and Moutounet M. 1997.
    ESI-MS analysis of polyphenolic oligomers and polymers. Analusis, 25(8): M32-M37.
    Ciani M, Comitini F, Mannazzu I and Domizio P. 2010. Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking. FEMS Yeast Research, 10(2): 123-133.
    Clarke RJ and Bakker J. 2004. Wine flavour chemistry. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd Cortes MB, Moreno J, Zea L, Moyano L and Medina M. 1998. Changes in aroma compounds of Sherry wines during their biological aging carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae races bayanus and capensis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46(6): 2389-2394.
    Danilewicz JC. 2007. Interaction of sulfur dioxide, polyphenols, and oxygen in a wine-model system: Central role of iron and copper. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 58(1): 53-60.
    Danilewicz JC, Seccombe JT and Whelan J. 2008. Mechanism of interaction of polyphenols, oxygen, and sulfur dioxide in model wine and wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59(2): 128-136.
    Dano S, Madsen MF and Sorensen PG. 2007. Quantitative characterization of cell synchronization in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(31): 12732-12736.
    Delfini C and Formica JV. 2001. Wine Microbiology: Science and Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker. Dellarco VL. 1988. A mutagenicity assessment of acetaldehyde. Mutation Research, 195: 1-20.
    Dharmadhikari MR and Wilker KL. 1998. Deacidification of high malate must with Schizosaccharomyces pombe. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 49(4): 408-412.
    Diaz-Montano DM, Delia ML, Estarron-Espinosa M and Strehaiano P. 2008. Fermentative capability and aroma compound production isolated from Agave tequilana Weber juice. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 42(7): 608-616.
    Divol B and Lonvaud-Funel A. 2004. Observation on the refermentation of sweet Botrytis-affected wines. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 38(3): 181-190.
    Dos Santos AM, Feuillat M and Charpentier C. 2000. Flor yeast metabolism in a model system similar to cellar ageing of the French "Vin Jaune": Evolution of some by-products, nitrogen compounds and polysaccharides. Vitis, 39(3): 129-134.
    Drysdale GS and Fleet GH. 1988. Acetic-acid bacteria in winemaking: a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 39(2): 143-154.
    Eglinton JM, Heinrich AJ, Pollnitz AP, Langridge P, Henschke PA and De Barros Lopes MA. 2002.
    Decreasing acetic acid accumulation by a glycerol overproducing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by deleting the ALD6 ALDH gene. Yeast, 19: 295-301.
    Embs RJ and Markakis P. 1965. Mechanism of sulfite inhibition of browning caused by polyphenol oxidase. Journal of Food Science, 30(5): 753-758.
    Es-Safi NE, Fulcrand H, Cheynier V and Moutounet M. 1999. Studies on the acetaldehyde-induced condensation of (-)-epicatechin and malvidin 3-O-glucoside in a model solution system. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47(5): 2096-2102.
    Espina N, Lima V, Lieber CS and Garro AJ. 1988. In vitro and in vivo inhibitory effect of ethanol and acetaldehyde on O6-methylguanine transferase. Carcinogenesis, 9(5): 761-766.
    Fenton GA and Kennedy MJ. 1998. Rapid dry weight determination of kiwifruit pomace and apple pomace using an infrared drying technique. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 26(1): 35-38.
    Ferreira ACD, Barbe JC and Bertrand A. 2002. Heterocyclic acetals from glycerol and acetaldehyde in port wines: evolution with aging. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(9): 2560-2564.
    Fleet GH. 2008. Wine yeasts for the future. FEMS Yeast Research, 8(7): 979-995.
    Flikweert MT, De Swaaf M, Van Dijken JP and Pronk JT. 1999. Growth requirements of pyruvate-decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 174(1): 73-79.
    Flikweert MT, Vanderzanden L, Janssen W, Steensma HY, Vandijken JP and Pronk JT. 1996. Pyruvate decarboxylase: An indispensable enzyme for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose. Yeast, 12(3): 247-257.
    Fugelsang KC and Edwards CG. 2007. Wine Microbiology. Practical applications and procedures. New York: Springer.
    Fulcrand H, Dossantos PJC, Sarnimanchado P, Cheynier V and Favrebonvin J. 1996. Structure of new anthocyanin-derived wine pigments. Journal of the Chemical Society-Perkin Transactions 1(7): 735-739.
    Guijo S, Mauricio JC, Salmon JM and Ortega JM. 1997. Determination of the relative ploidy in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for fermentation and "flor" film ageing of dry Sherry-type wines. Yeast, 13(2): 101-117.
    Gunnison AF and Jacobsen DW. 1988. Sulfite hypersensitivity. A critical review. CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 17(3): 17.
    Heard GM and Fleet GH. 1988. The effect of sulphur dioxide on yeast growth during natural and inoculated wine fermentation. Australian & New Zealand Wine Industry Journal, 3(3): 57-60.
    Henick-Kling T, Edinger WD, Daniel P and Monk P. 1998. Selective effects of sulfur dioxide and yeast starter culture addition on indigenous yeast populations and sensory characteristics of wine. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 84: 865-876.
    Herraiz T, Martin-Alvarez PJ, Reglero G, Herraiz M and Cabezudo MD. 1989. Differences between wines fermented with and without SO_2 using various selected yeasts. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 49: 249-258.
    Herrero M, Garcia LA and Diaz M. 2003. The effect of SO_2 on the production of ethanol, acetaldehyde, organic acids, and flavor volatiles during industrial cider fermentation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51(11): 3455-3459.
    Hohmann S. 1991. Characterization of PDC6, a third structural gene for pyruvate decarboxylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bacteriology, 173(24): 7963-7969.
    Hohmann S and Cederberg H. 1990. Autoregulation may control the expression of yeast pyruvate decarboxylase structural genes PDC1 and PDC5. European Journal of Biochemistry, 188(3): 615-621.
    Holz M, Otto C, Kretzschmar A, Yovkova V, Aurich A, Poetter M, Marx A and Barth G. 2011. Overexpression of alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase in Yarrowia lipolytica and its effect on production of organic acids. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 89(5): 1519-1526.
    Ingledew WM and Kunkee RE. 1985. Factors influencing sluggish fermentations of grape juice. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 36: 65-75.
    Ingraham JL, Maaloe O and Neidhardt FC. 1983. Growth of the Bacterial Cell. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
    Jackowetz JE, Dierschke SE and Mira de Orduna R. 2011. Multifactorial analysis of acetaldehyde kinetics during alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Research International, 44: 310-316.
    Jarvis B and Lea AGH. 2000. Sulphite binding in ciders. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35(1): 113-127.
    Jones RP. 1989. Biological principles for the effects of ethanol. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 11(3): 130-153.
    Jurd L. 1964. Reactions involved in sulfite bleaching of anthocyanins. Journal of Food Science, 29(1): 16-19.
    Jussier D, Dube Morneau A and Mira de Orduna R. 2006. Effect of simultaneous inoculation of yeast and bacteria on fermentation kinetics and key wine parameters during white winemaking. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(1): 221-227.
    Kennedy MJ and Phillips T. 1996. An infrared drying technique as a rapid reliable means of cell concentration estimation in fermentation systems. Biotechnology Techniques, 10(12): 895-898.
    Kiviharju K, Salonen K, Moilanen U and Eerikainen T. 2008. Biomass measurement online: the performance of in situ measurements and software sensors. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 35(7): 657-665.
    Kontkanen D, Inglis DL, Pickering GJ and Reynolds A. 2004. Effect of yeast inoculation rate, acclimatization, and nutrient addition on icewine fermentation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55(4): 363-370.
    Kronlof J and Linko M. 1992. Production of beer using immobilized yeast encoding alpha-acetaldehyde decarboxulase. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 98(6): 479-491.
    Kutyna DR, Varela C, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ and Stanley GA. 2010. Microbiological approaches to lowering ethanol concentration in wine. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 21(6): 293-302.
    Lachenmeier DW, Kanteres F and Rehm J. 2009. Carcinogenicity of acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages: risk assessment outside ethanol metabolism. Addiction, 104(4): 533-550.
    Lachenmeier DW and Sohnius EM. 2008. The role of acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism in the carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages: Evidence from a large chemical survey. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46(8): 2903-2911.
    Lea AGH, Ford GD and Fowler S. 2000. Analytical techniques for the estimation of sulphite binding components in ciders and wines. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35(1): 105-112.
    Lees GJ and Jago GR. 1976a. Acetaldehyde: an intermediate in the formation of ethanol from glucose by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science, 43: 63-73.
    Lees GJ and Jago GR. 1976b. Formation of acetaldehyde from threonine by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Research, 43: 75-83.
    Lees GJ and Jago GR. 1977. Formation of acetaldehyde from 2-deoxy-D-ribose-5-phosphate in lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Research, 44: 139-144.
    Lemperle E. 1994. Yeast nutrients - why use them? Der Deutsche Weinbau(19): 23-26.
    Li E and Mira De Orduna R. 2010. A rapid method for the determination of microbial biomass by dry weight using a moisture analyzer with an infrared heating source and an analytical balance. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 50(3): 283-288.
    Li E and Mira De Orduna R. 2011. Evaluation of the acetaldehyde production and degradation potential of 26 enological Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeast strains in a resting cell model system. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 38(9): 1391-1398.
    Li H, Guo A and Wang H. 2008. Mechanisms of oxidative browning of wine. Food Chemistry, 108(1): 1-13.
    Liu SQ and Pilone GJ. 2000. An overwiew of formation and roles of acetaldehyde in winemaking with emphasis on microbiological implications. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35: 49-61.
    Longo E, Velazquez JB, Sieiro C, Cansado J, Calo P and Villa TG. 1992. Production of higher alcohols, ethyl-acetate, acetaldehyde and other compounds by 14 Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains isolated from the same region (Salnes, NW Spain). World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 8(5): 539-541.
    Lonvaud-Funel A. 1999. Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology, 76: 317-331.
    Luek E. 1997. Antimicrobial Food Additives. New York: Springer Macheix JJ, Sapis JC and Fleuriet A. 1991. Phenolic compounds and polyphenol oxidase in relation to browning in grapes and wines. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 30(4): 441-486.
    Maestre O, Garcia-Martinez T, Peinado RA and Mauricio JC. 2008. Effects of ADH2 overexpression in Saccharomyces bayanus during alcoholic fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(3): 702-707.
    Meaden PG, Dickinson FM, Mifsud A, Tessier W, Westwater J, Bussey H and Midgley M. 1997. The ALD6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a cytosolic, Mg(2+)-activated acetaldehyde dehydrogenase. Yeast, 13(14): 1319-1327.
    Millan C and Ortega JM. 1988. Production of ethanol, acetaldehyde, and acetic acid in wine by various yeast races: role of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 39(2): 107-112.
    Mira De Orduna R, Liu SQ, Patchett ML and Pilone GJ. 2000. Kinetics of the arginine metabolism of malolactic wine lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus buchneri CUC-3 and Oenococcus oeni LO111. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 89(3): 547-552.
    Miyake T and Shibamoto T. 1993. Quantitative analysis of acetaldehyde in foods and beverages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 41: 1968-1970.
    Mohammed I. 2007. Gene expression profile of ethanol-stressed yeast in the presence of acetaldehyde: Victoria University
    Moreno-Arribas MV and Polo MC. 2008. Wine chemistry and biochemistry. New York, USA: Springer Naumova ES, Ivannikova YV and Naumov GI. 2005. Genetic differentiation of the sherry yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 41(6): 578-582.
    Navarro-Avino JP, Prasad R, Miralles VJ, Benito RM and Serrano R. 1999. A proposal for nomenclature of aldehyde dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterization of the stress-inducible ALD2 and ALD3 genes. Yeast, 15: 829-842.
    Neuberg C, Hirsch J and Reinfurth E. 1920. The three fermentation-forms of sugar, their coherences and balance. Biochemische Zeitschrift, 105: 307-336. Neuberg C and Reinfurth E. 1918. The determination of the aldehyde stage in alcoholic fermentation an experimental argument for the acetaldehyde pyrunic acid theory. Biochemische Zeitschrift, 89: 365-414.
    Nevoigt E and Stahl U. 1996. Reduced pyruvate decarboxylase and increased glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD+] levels enhance glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 12(13): 1331-1337.
    Nisiotou AA, Spiropoulos AE and Nychas GJE. 2007. Yeast community structures and dynamics in healthy and Botrytis-affected grape must fermentations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(21): 6705-6713.
    Nykanen L. 1986. Formation and occurrence of flavor compounds in wine and distilled alcoholic beverages. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 37: 84-96.
    Osborne JP, Dube Morneau A and Mira de Orduna R. 2006. Degradation of free and sulphur-dioxide-bound acetaldehyde by malolactic lactic acid bacteria in white wine. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 101: 474-479.
    Osborne JP, Mira de Orduna R, Liu SQ and Pilone GJ. 2000. Acetaldehyde metabolism by wine lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 191(1): 51-55.
    Ough CS and Amerine MA. 1961. Studies on controlled fermentation. V. Effects on color, composition, and quality of red wines. American Journal Enology and Viticulture, 12(1): 9-19.
    Pan W, Jussier D, Terrade N, Yada RY and Mira de Orduna R. 2011. Kinetics of sugars, organic acids and acetaldehyde during simultaneous yeast-bacterial fermentations of white wine at different pH values. Food Research International, 44: 660-666.
    Park H and Hwang YS. 2008. Genome-wide transcriptional responses to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Microbiology, 46(5): 542-548.
    Peppler HJ and Perlman D. 1979. Microbial Technology: Fermentation Technology. New York: Academic Press.
    Pigeau GM and Inglis DL. 2005. Upregulation of ALD3 and GPD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during Icewine fermentation. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 99(1): 112-125.
    Pigeau GM and Inglis DL. 2007. Response of wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae aldehyde dehydrogenases to acetaldehyde stress during Icewine fermentation. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103(5): 1576-1586.
    Pretorius IS. 2000. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast, 16: 675-729.
    Racker E. 1950. Crystalline alcohol dehydrogenase from bakers’yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 184(1): 313-320.
    Rankine BC. 1967. Influence of yeast strain and pH on pyruvic acid content of wines. Journal of the Sc ience of Food and Agriculture, 18(2): 41-47.
    Rankine BC and Pocock KF. 1969. Influence of yeast strain on binding of sulphur dioxide in wines, and on its formation during fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 20: 104-109.
    Remize F, Sablayrolles JM and Dequin S. 2000. Re-assessment of the influence of yeast strain and environmental factors on glycerol production in wine. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 88(3): 371-378.
    Remy S, Fulcrand H, Labarbe B, Cheynier V and Moutounet M. 2000. First confirmation in red wine of products resulting from direct anthocyanin-tannin reactions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80(6): 745-751.
    Riballo E, Herweijer M, Wolf DH and Lagunas R. 1995. Catabolite inactivation of the yeast maltose transporter occurs in the vacuole after internalization by endocytosis. Journal of Bacteriology, 177(19): 5622-5627.
    Ribereau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Don?che B and Lonvaud-Funel A. 2000. Handbook of enology: The microbiology of wine and vinifications.
    Richard P, Bakker BM, Teusink B, Vandam K and Westerhoff HV. 1996. Acetaldehyde mediates the synchronization of sustained glycolytic oscillations in populations of yeast cells. European Journal of Biochemistry, 235(1-2): 238-241.
    Romano P, Caruso M, Capece A, Lipani G, Paraggio M and Fiore C. 2003. Metabolic diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from spontaneously fermented grape musts. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 19(3): 311-315.
    Romano P and Suzzi G, 1993. Sulphur dioxide and wine microorganisms. In: Fleet G. H., ed. Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 373-393.
    Romano P and Suzzi G. 1996. Origin and rroduction of acetoin during wine yeast fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62(2): 309-315.
    Romano P, Suzzi G, Turbanti L and Polsinelli M. 1994. Acetaldehyde production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 118(3): 213-218.
    Romero C and Bakker J. 1999. Interactions between grape anthocyanins and pyruvic acid, with effect of pH and acid concentration on anthocyanin composition and color in model solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47(8): 3130-3139.
    Romero C and Bakker J. 2000. Effect of acetaldehyde and several acids on the formation of vitisin A in model wine anthocyanin and colour evolution. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35: 129-140.
    Rosenfeld E, Beauvoit B, Blondin B and Salmon JM. 2003. Oxygen consumption by anaerobic Saccharomyces cerevisiae under enological conditions: effect on fermentation kinetics. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(1): 113-121.
    Sacchi KL, Bisson LF and Adams DO. 2006. A review of the effect of winemaking techniques on phenolic extraction in red wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 56(3): 197-206.
    Saint-Prix F, Bonquist L and Dequin S. 2004. Functional analysis of the ALD gene family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic growth on glucose: the NADP+-dependent Ald6p and Ald5p isoforms play a major role in acetate formation. Microbiology, 150(7): 2209-2220.
    Salaspuro M. 2011. Acetaldehyde and gastric cancer. Journal of Digestive Diseases, 12(2): 51-59.
    Salmon JM. 1989. Effect of sugar transport inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on sluggish and stuck fermentations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55(4): 953-958.
    Saucier C, Little D and Glories Y. 1997. First evidence of acetaldehyde-flavanol condensation products in red wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 48(3): 370-373.
    Sayavedrasoto LA and Montgomery MW. 1986. Inhibition of polyphenoloxidase by sulfite. Journal of Food Science, 51(6): 1531-1536.
    Sonni F, Chinnici F, Natali N and Riponi C. 2011. Pre-fermentative replacement of sulphur dioxide by lysozyme and oenological tannins: Effect on the formation and evolution of volatile compounds during the bottle storage of white wines. Food Chemistry, 129(3): 1193-1200.
    Stanbury PF, Whitaker A and Hall SJ. 1995. Principles of fermentation technology. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Stanley GA, Douglas NG, Every EJ, Tzanatos T and Pamment NB. 1993. Inhibition and stimulation of yeast growth by acetaldehyde. Biotechnology Letters, 15: 1199-1204.
    Stanley GA, Hobley TJ and Pamment NB. 1997. Effect of acetaldehyde on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis subjected to environmental shocks. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 53: 71-78.
    Stratford M, Morgan P and Rose AH. 1987. Sulphur dioxide resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces ludwigii. Journal of General Microbiology, 133: 2173-2179.
    Then R and Radler F. 1970. Regulation of acetaldehyde concentration in culture medium during fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Archiv fur Mikrobiologie, 72(1): 60-67.
    Timberlake CF and Bridle P. 1976. Interactions between anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, and acetaldehyde and their significance in red wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 27(3): 97-105.
    Tronchoni J, Gamero A, Arroyo-Lopez FN, Barrio E and Querol A. 2009. Differences in the glucose and fructose consumption profiles in diverse Saccharomyces wine species and their hybrids during grape juice fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 134(3): 237-243.
    Ugliano M and Henschke PA, 2009. Yeasts and Wine Flavour. In: Moreno-Arribas M. V. and Carmen Polo M., eds. Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry. New York: Springer, 313-392.
    Vally H, Misso NLA and Madan V. 2009. Clinical effects of sulphite additives. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 39(11): 1643-1651.
    Walker-Caprioglio HM and Parks LW. 1987. Autoconditioning factor relieves ethanol-induced growth inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53(1): 33-35.
    Wang DL, Sun JS, Zhang WJ, Jia FC, Yang Y, Lin ZP, Feng JZ and Pavlovic M. 2006. Disruption of brewer's yeast Alcohol dehydrogenase II gene and reduction of acetaldehyde content during brewery fermentation. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 64(4): 195-201.
    Wang M, Mcintee EJ, Cheng G, Shi YL, Villalta PW and Hecht SS. 2000. Identification of DNA adducts of acetaldehyde. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 13(11): 1149-1157.
    Weeks C. 1969. Production of sulfur dioxide-binding compounds and of sulfur dioxide by two Saccharomyces yeasts. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 20: 32-39.
    Wildenradt HL and Singleton VL. 1974. The production of aldehydes as a result of oxidation of polyphenolic compounds and its relation to wine aging. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 25(2): 119-126.
    Wills C and Phelps J. 1975. A technique for the isolation of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase mutants with altered substrate specificity. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 167(2): 627-637.
    Zamora F, 2009. Biochemistry of Alcoholic Fermentation. In: Moreno-Arribas M. V. and Carmen Polo M., eds. Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry. New York: Springer, 3-22.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700