新地区主义与东亚经济合作
|
摘要
本论文选取了新地区主义作为理论框架来分析东亚经济合作并对中国构建在东亚地区的地区主义战略进行了探讨。20世纪90年代以来新地区主义的蓬勃发展已经成为东亚地区的一个重要特征。新地区主义在东亚的兴起无疑为东亚经济合作提供了很好的思路,发展和丰富了地区经济合作的理念,并推动着东亚经济合作的进程。东亚经济合作也为新地区主义提供了强大的发展动力。二者之间的良性互动,必将在很大程度上塑造东亚经济合作的未来。在新地区主义的影响下,东亚经济合作的四种结构(东盟FTA、东盟10+1FTA、中日韩FTA和10+3下的APT)开始建立或发展起来,它们都有可能成为东亚经济共同体的雏形。对这几种结构进行研究分析后,中日韩分别与东盟发展自由贸易区,待到时机成熟再将三者联合组建东亚自由贸易区,成为新地区主义框架下东亚经济合作发展的最佳途径选择。但是现阶段东亚经济合作的发展却因为东亚地区制度的缺失而面临诸多问题,本文借助国际关系理论对新地区主义发展的理解,分别从权利与利益、制度、规范与认同三个视角对东亚经济合作中的美国因素、主导国缺失和东亚认同缺乏等相关制约因素进行了分析。最后探讨了中国的东亚地区主义战略,认为积极参与东亚经济合作是中国在东亚的地区主义战略的重要内容之一。同时提出中国在东亚经济合作中应该继续保持积极参与者而非积极主导者的自我定位。
In this thesis, I choose new regionalism as the theory frame to analyze the East Asian economic cooperation and discuss the China’s East Asian regionalist stratagem. Since the1990s the vigorous development of new regionalism has been an important feature in East Asia. The rise of new regionalism emerged in East Asia provides a finer way, development and enriched the regional economic cooperation, and promote the process of the East Asian economic cooperation. The East Asian economic cooperation has also provided powerful driving for the new regionalism. Benign interaction between the two’s, will largely mold the future of the East Asian economic cooperation. Under the new regionalism, the four kinds of structure which belong to East Asian economy cooperation established and developing, they have the possibility to become the embryonic form that the East Asian economy community have. Under the new regionalism frame, after analysis these three development approach of The East Asian economy cooperation, it is most feasibility that China, Japan and South Korea develop the free-trade area separately with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, treats three composes to the East Asian free-trade area, when the conditions are ripe. Under the new regionalism, because of the East Asia system's flaw East Asian economy cooperation faced with many problems, this article use the international relations theory to the new regionalism's analysis frame, separately from the right and the benefit, the system, the standard and approved these three angles of view to analysis restriction factor which the East Asian economic cooperation have. The last, I have discussed China's East Asian regionalist strategy, thought that participates positively to the East Asian economic cooperation is an important contents. of China’s East Asian regionalist strategy. I also suggest that China should continue keep the self-localization which maintains the positive and active participants rather than leading, when China participates to the East Asian economic cooperation.
In this thesis, I choose new regionalism as the theory frame to analyze the East Asian economic cooperation and discuss the China’s East Asian regionalist stratagem. Since the1990s the vigorous development of new regionalism has been an important feature in East Asia. The rise of new regionalism emerged in East Asia provides a finer way, development and enriched the regional economic cooperation, and promote the process of the East Asian economic cooperation. The East Asian economic cooperation has also provided powerful driving for the new regionalism. Benign interaction between the two’s, will largely mold the future of the East Asian economic cooperation. Under the new regionalism, the four kinds of structure which belong to East Asian economy cooperation established and developing, they have the possibility to become the embryonic form that the East Asian economy community have. Under the new regionalism frame, after analysis these three development approach of The East Asian economy cooperation, it is most feasibility that China, Japan and South Korea develop the free-trade area separately with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, treats three composes to the East Asian free-trade area, when the conditions are ripe. Under the new regionalism, because of the East Asia system's flaw East Asian economy cooperation faced with many problems, this article use the international relations theory to the new regionalism's analysis frame, separately from the right and the benefit, the system, the standard and approved these three angles of view to analysis restriction factor which the East Asian economic cooperation have. The last, I have discussed China's East Asian regionalist strategy, thought that participates positively to the East Asian economic cooperation is an important contents. of China’s East Asian regionalist strategy. I also suggest that China should continue keep the self-localization which maintains the positive and active participants rather than leading, when China participates to the East Asian economic cooperation.
引文
①Norman D Palmer. The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific[M], Lexington Books, 1991:5.
②Gilpin Robert. The Political Economy of International Relations[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987:25
③Gowa Joanne. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994:5.
①Joseph S. Nye, Jr. International Regionalism: Readings, Little Brown and Company, 1968.转引自马孆.区域主义与发展国家[J].中国社会科学出版社, 2002: 2.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社, 2003: 8.
①耿协峰.“新地区主义”研究——不同视角的评析[J].世界经济与政治, 2001:22.
②Norman D. Palmer. The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Lexington Books, 1991:5.
③Peter Robson, The Economics of International Integration[M], London: Routleedge, 1998: 1.
④Paul Bowles. Regionalism and development after the global financial crisis[J]. New Political Economy, 2000, 11(5): 433.
⑤Edward D. Mansfield , Helen V. Milner.“The Political Economy of Regionalism: an Overview”, in their co-edited The Political Economy of Regionalism[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997: .3.
⑥Joseph S. Nye. Jr. International Regionalism: Readings. Little Brown and Company, 1968.转引自马孆.区域主义与发展国家[J].中国社会科学出版社,2002: 2.
①Helge Hveem. Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalization, in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill (eds), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order[M]. Oxford University press, 2000: 70-81.
②Andrew Hurrell. Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1995: 38-45.
③Fu-Kuo liu. East Asian Regionalism: Theoretical Perspective, in Fu-Kuo liu and Philippe Regnier, Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting[M], London: Routledgecurzon, 2003: 7.
④Biorn Hettne, A. Inota, The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security[M]. UNU/WIDER.Helsinki, 1994: 69.
⑤肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:148.
⑥耿协峰.新地区主义与亚太地区结构变动[M].北京大学出版社,2003:37.
⑦庞中英.地区主义与民族主义[J].欧洲,1999(2):42.
①王学玉.论地区主义及其对国际关系的影响[J].现代国际关系, 2002(8):29.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社, 2003:10.
③张超.新区域主义的兴起及其在东亚的发展研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2004:29.
①薛真,彭升.东亚区域合作对欧盟经验的借鉴与超越——以新地区主义的视角[J].社会科学战线,2006(3):185.
②Robert Z. Lawrence. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration[M]. Washington. D. C: The Brooking Institution, 1996:80.
③赵洪.东盟的区域一体化战略与东亚经济合作[J].东南亚,2006(2):2.
②宋玉华.开放的地区主义与亚太经济合作组织[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001:120-125.
①李建民.东亚区域经济合作战略选择的动因分析——“新地区主义”思潮的兴起[J].社会科学战线,2006(1): 293.
①Andrew Hurrell.“Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective”, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds.Regionalism in World Politics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1995:37-73.
②黄范章.90年代东亚地区的形势与格局[J].世界经济,1996(6):7.
①ASEAN Secretariat(2003),Declaration of ASEAN ConcordⅡ(Bali ConcordⅡ),7 October 2003, http://www.aseansec.org/15159.htm.
①外交部副部长长王毅向记者发表评论[N].人民日报,2002-12-5.
①北原淳,西口清圣.东南亚的经济[M].厦门大学出版社,2004:5.
①刘宁.构建东北亚铁三角——论中日韩自由贸易区的建立.改革与开放[J],2005(3):24.
②经济参考报[N].2003-5-21.
③陆忠伟:.新旧交替的东亚格局[M].北京时事出版社,1993:218.
①星洲联合早报[N].1997-12-20.
①肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:153.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:154.
③Andrew Hurrell.“Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective”, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds.Regionalism in World Politics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1995:51-52.
④肖欢容地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:129.
①大卫鲍德温主编.新现实主义和新自由主义[M].浙江人民出版社,2001:209.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:130.
①Amitav Acharya. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia:ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order[M]. London: Routleedge, 2001:4.
②郭树勇.建构主义的”共同体和评论”[J].欧洲,2001(2):22.
③Glenn Hook & Ian Kearns. Subregionalism and World Order[M]. Macmillan Press Ltd., 1999:3.
④庞中英.地区化、地区性与地区主义——论东亚地区主义.世界经济与政治[J],2003(11):26.
①孙学峰,陈寒溪.中国地区主义政策的战略效应[J].世界经济与政治,2006(5):27.
①秦亚青.国家身份、战略文化和安全利益[J].世界经济与政治,2003(1):11.
②姜运仓.东亚经济合作中的身份构建[J].国际观察,2004(4):63.
③庞中英.中国与亚洲——观察、研究、评论[M].上海社会科学出版社,2004:226.
④肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社.2003:239.
⑤西方国家20世纪90年代前半期对中国的看法,参见阎学通.西方人看中国的崛起.现代国际关系,1996(9):41~45.东盟国家对中国的看法,参见曹云华.新中国—东盟关系论.北京:世界知识出版社,2005:214.
①曼谷协定,全称为《亚太经济社会发展中国家成员国贸易谈判第一协定》,1975年签订.
①http://win.mofcom.gov.cn/yanjiu/view.asp?news_id=7621.
②http://www.customslawyer.cn/cn/articleshow.asp?CId=20277.
③数据来自:http://news.qq.com/a/20071125/000638.htm.
④http://www.yishangwang.com/info/detail/20-34068.html.
①马树生,刘厚俊.新地区主义与中国东亚区域合作战略[J].金融纵横,2004(4):32.
[1]耿协峰.“新地区主义”研究——不同视角的评析[J].世界经济与政治,2001(1).
[2]庞中英.地区主义与民族主义[J].欧洲,1999(2).
[3]王学玉.论地区主义及其对国际关系的影响[J].现代国际关系,2002(8).
[4]赵洪.东盟的区域一体化战略与东亚经济合作[J].东南亚,2006(2).
[5]李建民.东亚区域经济合作战略选择的动因分析——“新地区主义”思潮的兴起[J].社会科学战线,2006(1).
[6]黄范章.90年代东亚地区的形势与格局[J].世界经济,1996(6).
[7]刘宁.构建东北亚铁三角——论中日韩自由贸易区的建立[J].改革与开放,2005(3).
[8]郭树勇.建构主义的“共同体和评论”[J].欧洲,2001(2).
[9]庞中英.地区化、地区性与地区主义——论东亚地区主义[J].世界经济与政治,2003(11).
[10]孙学峰,陈寒溪.中国地区主义政策的战略效应[J].世界经济与政治,2006(5).
[11]秦亚青.国家身份、战略文化和安全利益[J].世界经济与政治,2003(1).
[12]姜运仓.东亚经济合作中的身份构建[J].国际观察,2004(4).
[13]马树生,刘厚俊.新地区主义与中国东亚区域合作战略[J].金融纵横,2004(4).
[14]金熙德.“后‘雁行模式’”时代的中日关系[J].世界经济与政治,2002(8).
[1]肖欢容.地区主义理论的历史演进[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,2003.
[2]倪世雄.当代西方国际关系理论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
[3]张蕴岭,周小兵.东亚合作的进程与前景[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003.
[4]高增杰.日本与东亚经济合作[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2002.
[5]宋玉华.开放的地区主义与亚太经济合作组织[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[6]耿协峰.新地区主义与亚太地区结构变动[M].北京大学出版社,2003.
[7]陈玉刚.国家与超国家——欧洲一体化理论比较研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
[8]姜春明,张强.东亚地区的国际分工与经济合作[M].天津:南开大学出版社,1994.
[8]张蕴岭,赵江林.亚太区域合作的发展[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003.
[10]陆建人.东盟的今天与明天[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1999.
[11]廖少廉,陈雯.东盟区域经济合作研究[M].北京:中国对外经济贸易出版社,2003.
[12]韦红.地区主义视野下的中国—东盟合作研究[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2006.
[13]陈勇.新区域主义与东亚经济一体化[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.
[14]韦民.民族主义与地区主义的互动:东盟研究新视角[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[15]吉尔平.杨宇光.译.全球政治经济学——解读国际经济秩序[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[16]徐长文.中国领跑东亚区域合作[M].北京:中国海关出版社,2003.
[17]陈乔之.东亚区域经济合作研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.
[18]王振锁,李钢哲.东亚区域经济合作:中国与日本[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2002.
[19]肖欢容.和平的地理学——中国学者论东亚地区主义[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2005.
[20]夏禹龙.亚太地区经济合作与中国亚太经济战略[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1996.
[21]马孆.区域主义与发展中国家[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.
[22]庞中英.中国与亚洲——观察、研究、评论[M].上海:上海社会科学出版社,2004.
[23]大卫鲍德温.新现实主义和新自由主义[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001.
[24]陆忠伟.新旧交替的东亚格局[M].北京:北京时事出版社,1993.
[25] (日)北原淳,西口清圣.东南亚的经济[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2004.
[1]纪振强.东亚地区主义的分析:以10+3合作机制为视角[D].山东:山东大学.2004.
[2]卢春光.东亚地区主义的结构、特点与前景——兼论中国的东亚地区战略[D].上海:华东师范大学.2006.
[3]姜运仓.东亚区域经济合作研究——国际政治经济学视角分析[D].北京:中共中央党校.2005.
[4]尹枚.区域主义理论与东亚区域主义实践——兼论中国的政策选择[D].广东:暨南大学.2005.
[5]张超.新区域主义的兴起及其在东亚的发展研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学.2004.二、英文参考文献
[1] Andrew Hurrell. Regionalism in Theoretic Perspective,in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell eds. Regionalism in World Politics:Regionalism Organization and International Order[M]. Oxford University Press,1995∕1997.
[2] Andrew Mark, John Ravenhill (eds.). Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region[M]. Westview Press, 1995.
[3] Norman D. Palmer. The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Lexington Books, 1991.
[4] Vayrynen Raimo,. Regionalism: Old and New[J], International Studies Review 5, 2003.
[5] Edward J. Lincoin (eds.). East Asian Economic Regionalism[M], Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
[6] Adlai E Stevenson. Regional financial cooperation in Asia[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2004(10).
[7] David Shambaugh.“China Engages Asia:Reshaping the Regional Order”[J]. International Security, 2005(3).
[8] Glenn Hook & Ian Kearns. Subregionalism and World Order[M]. Macmillan Press Ltd, 1999.
[9] Amitav Acharya. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia:ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order[M]. London: Routleedge, 2001.
[10] Kart W. Dcutsh. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area——International Organization in the Light Historical Experience[M]. Princeton University Press, 1957.
[11] Robert Z. Lawrence. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration[M]. Washington D C: The Brooking Institution, 1996.
[12] Biorn Hettne, A. Inota. The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security[M]. UNU/WIDER, Helsinki, 1994.
[13] Fu-Kuo liu. East Asian Regionalism: Theoretical Perspective, in Fu-Kuo liu and Philippe Regnier, Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting[M]. London: Routledgecurzon, 2003.
[14] Helge Hveem. Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalization, in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill (eds). Political Economy and the Changing Global Order[M], Oxford University press, 2000.
[15] Edward D. Mansfield, Helen V. Milner. The Political Economy of Regionalism: an Overview, in their co-edited The Political Economy of Regionalism[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
[16] Paul Bowles. Regionalism and development after the global financial crisis[J]. New Political Economy, 2000.(3)5.
[17] Peter Robson. The Economics of International Integration[M]. London: Routleedge, 1998.
②Gilpin Robert. The Political Economy of International Relations[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987:25
③Gowa Joanne. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994:5.
①Joseph S. Nye, Jr. International Regionalism: Readings, Little Brown and Company, 1968.转引自马孆.区域主义与发展国家[J].中国社会科学出版社, 2002: 2.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社, 2003: 8.
①耿协峰.“新地区主义”研究——不同视角的评析[J].世界经济与政治, 2001:22.
②Norman D. Palmer. The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Lexington Books, 1991:5.
③Peter Robson, The Economics of International Integration[M], London: Routleedge, 1998: 1.
④Paul Bowles. Regionalism and development after the global financial crisis[J]. New Political Economy, 2000, 11(5): 433.
⑤Edward D. Mansfield , Helen V. Milner.“The Political Economy of Regionalism: an Overview”, in their co-edited The Political Economy of Regionalism[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997: .3.
⑥Joseph S. Nye. Jr. International Regionalism: Readings. Little Brown and Company, 1968.转引自马孆.区域主义与发展国家[J].中国社会科学出版社,2002: 2.
①Helge Hveem. Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalization, in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill (eds), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order[M]. Oxford University press, 2000: 70-81.
②Andrew Hurrell. Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1995: 38-45.
③Fu-Kuo liu. East Asian Regionalism: Theoretical Perspective, in Fu-Kuo liu and Philippe Regnier, Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting[M], London: Routledgecurzon, 2003: 7.
④Biorn Hettne, A. Inota, The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security[M]. UNU/WIDER.Helsinki, 1994: 69.
⑤肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:148.
⑥耿协峰.新地区主义与亚太地区结构变动[M].北京大学出版社,2003:37.
⑦庞中英.地区主义与民族主义[J].欧洲,1999(2):42.
①王学玉.论地区主义及其对国际关系的影响[J].现代国际关系, 2002(8):29.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社, 2003:10.
③张超.新区域主义的兴起及其在东亚的发展研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2004:29.
①薛真,彭升.东亚区域合作对欧盟经验的借鉴与超越——以新地区主义的视角[J].社会科学战线,2006(3):185.
②Robert Z. Lawrence. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration[M]. Washington. D. C: The Brooking Institution, 1996:80.
③赵洪.东盟的区域一体化战略与东亚经济合作[J].东南亚,2006(2):2.
②宋玉华.开放的地区主义与亚太经济合作组织[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001:120-125.
①李建民.东亚区域经济合作战略选择的动因分析——“新地区主义”思潮的兴起[J].社会科学战线,2006(1): 293.
①Andrew Hurrell.“Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective”, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds.Regionalism in World Politics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1995:37-73.
②黄范章.90年代东亚地区的形势与格局[J].世界经济,1996(6):7.
①ASEAN Secretariat(2003),Declaration of ASEAN ConcordⅡ(Bali ConcordⅡ),7 October 2003, http://www.aseansec.org/15159.htm.
①外交部副部长长王毅向记者发表评论[N].人民日报,2002-12-5.
①北原淳,西口清圣.东南亚的经济[M].厦门大学出版社,2004:5.
①刘宁.构建东北亚铁三角——论中日韩自由贸易区的建立.改革与开放[J],2005(3):24.
②经济参考报[N].2003-5-21.
③陆忠伟:.新旧交替的东亚格局[M].北京时事出版社,1993:218.
①星洲联合早报[N].1997-12-20.
①肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:153.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:154.
③Andrew Hurrell.“Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective”, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds.Regionalism in World Politics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1995:51-52.
④肖欢容地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:129.
①大卫鲍德温主编.新现实主义和新自由主义[M].浙江人民出版社,2001:209.
②肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社,2003:130.
①Amitav Acharya. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia:ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order[M]. London: Routleedge, 2001:4.
②郭树勇.建构主义的”共同体和评论”[J].欧洲,2001(2):22.
③Glenn Hook & Ian Kearns. Subregionalism and World Order[M]. Macmillan Press Ltd., 1999:3.
④庞中英.地区化、地区性与地区主义——论东亚地区主义.世界经济与政治[J],2003(11):26.
①孙学峰,陈寒溪.中国地区主义政策的战略效应[J].世界经济与政治,2006(5):27.
①秦亚青.国家身份、战略文化和安全利益[J].世界经济与政治,2003(1):11.
②姜运仓.东亚经济合作中的身份构建[J].国际观察,2004(4):63.
③庞中英.中国与亚洲——观察、研究、评论[M].上海社会科学出版社,2004:226.
④肖欢容.地区主义:理论的历史演进[M].北京广播学院出版社.2003:239.
⑤西方国家20世纪90年代前半期对中国的看法,参见阎学通.西方人看中国的崛起.现代国际关系,1996(9):41~45.东盟国家对中国的看法,参见曹云华.新中国—东盟关系论.北京:世界知识出版社,2005:214.
①曼谷协定,全称为《亚太经济社会发展中国家成员国贸易谈判第一协定》,1975年签订.
①http://win.mofcom.gov.cn/yanjiu/view.asp?news_id=7621.
②http://www.customslawyer.cn/cn/articleshow.asp?CId=20277.
③数据来自:http://news.qq.com/a/20071125/000638.htm.
④http://www.yishangwang.com/info/detail/20-34068.html.
①马树生,刘厚俊.新地区主义与中国东亚区域合作战略[J].金融纵横,2004(4):32.
[1]耿协峰.“新地区主义”研究——不同视角的评析[J].世界经济与政治,2001(1).
[2]庞中英.地区主义与民族主义[J].欧洲,1999(2).
[3]王学玉.论地区主义及其对国际关系的影响[J].现代国际关系,2002(8).
[4]赵洪.东盟的区域一体化战略与东亚经济合作[J].东南亚,2006(2).
[5]李建民.东亚区域经济合作战略选择的动因分析——“新地区主义”思潮的兴起[J].社会科学战线,2006(1).
[6]黄范章.90年代东亚地区的形势与格局[J].世界经济,1996(6).
[7]刘宁.构建东北亚铁三角——论中日韩自由贸易区的建立[J].改革与开放,2005(3).
[8]郭树勇.建构主义的“共同体和评论”[J].欧洲,2001(2).
[9]庞中英.地区化、地区性与地区主义——论东亚地区主义[J].世界经济与政治,2003(11).
[10]孙学峰,陈寒溪.中国地区主义政策的战略效应[J].世界经济与政治,2006(5).
[11]秦亚青.国家身份、战略文化和安全利益[J].世界经济与政治,2003(1).
[12]姜运仓.东亚经济合作中的身份构建[J].国际观察,2004(4).
[13]马树生,刘厚俊.新地区主义与中国东亚区域合作战略[J].金融纵横,2004(4).
[14]金熙德.“后‘雁行模式’”时代的中日关系[J].世界经济与政治,2002(8).
[1]肖欢容.地区主义理论的历史演进[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,2003.
[2]倪世雄.当代西方国际关系理论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
[3]张蕴岭,周小兵.东亚合作的进程与前景[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003.
[4]高增杰.日本与东亚经济合作[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2002.
[5]宋玉华.开放的地区主义与亚太经济合作组织[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[6]耿协峰.新地区主义与亚太地区结构变动[M].北京大学出版社,2003.
[7]陈玉刚.国家与超国家——欧洲一体化理论比较研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
[8]姜春明,张强.东亚地区的国际分工与经济合作[M].天津:南开大学出版社,1994.
[8]张蕴岭,赵江林.亚太区域合作的发展[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003.
[10]陆建人.东盟的今天与明天[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1999.
[11]廖少廉,陈雯.东盟区域经济合作研究[M].北京:中国对外经济贸易出版社,2003.
[12]韦红.地区主义视野下的中国—东盟合作研究[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2006.
[13]陈勇.新区域主义与东亚经济一体化[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.
[14]韦民.民族主义与地区主义的互动:东盟研究新视角[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[15]吉尔平.杨宇光.译.全球政治经济学——解读国际经济秩序[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[16]徐长文.中国领跑东亚区域合作[M].北京:中国海关出版社,2003.
[17]陈乔之.东亚区域经济合作研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.
[18]王振锁,李钢哲.东亚区域经济合作:中国与日本[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2002.
[19]肖欢容.和平的地理学——中国学者论东亚地区主义[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2005.
[20]夏禹龙.亚太地区经济合作与中国亚太经济战略[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1996.
[21]马孆.区域主义与发展中国家[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.
[22]庞中英.中国与亚洲——观察、研究、评论[M].上海:上海社会科学出版社,2004.
[23]大卫鲍德温.新现实主义和新自由主义[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001.
[24]陆忠伟.新旧交替的东亚格局[M].北京:北京时事出版社,1993.
[25] (日)北原淳,西口清圣.东南亚的经济[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2004.
[1]纪振强.东亚地区主义的分析:以10+3合作机制为视角[D].山东:山东大学.2004.
[2]卢春光.东亚地区主义的结构、特点与前景——兼论中国的东亚地区战略[D].上海:华东师范大学.2006.
[3]姜运仓.东亚区域经济合作研究——国际政治经济学视角分析[D].北京:中共中央党校.2005.
[4]尹枚.区域主义理论与东亚区域主义实践——兼论中国的政策选择[D].广东:暨南大学.2005.
[5]张超.新区域主义的兴起及其在东亚的发展研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学.2004.二、英文参考文献
[1] Andrew Hurrell. Regionalism in Theoretic Perspective,in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell eds. Regionalism in World Politics:Regionalism Organization and International Order[M]. Oxford University Press,1995∕1997.
[2] Andrew Mark, John Ravenhill (eds.). Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region[M]. Westview Press, 1995.
[3] Norman D. Palmer. The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Lexington Books, 1991.
[4] Vayrynen Raimo,. Regionalism: Old and New[J], International Studies Review 5, 2003.
[5] Edward J. Lincoin (eds.). East Asian Economic Regionalism[M], Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
[6] Adlai E Stevenson. Regional financial cooperation in Asia[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2004(10).
[7] David Shambaugh.“China Engages Asia:Reshaping the Regional Order”[J]. International Security, 2005(3).
[8] Glenn Hook & Ian Kearns. Subregionalism and World Order[M]. Macmillan Press Ltd, 1999.
[9] Amitav Acharya. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia:ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order[M]. London: Routleedge, 2001.
[10] Kart W. Dcutsh. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area——International Organization in the Light Historical Experience[M]. Princeton University Press, 1957.
[11] Robert Z. Lawrence. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration[M]. Washington D C: The Brooking Institution, 1996.
[12] Biorn Hettne, A. Inota. The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security[M]. UNU/WIDER, Helsinki, 1994.
[13] Fu-Kuo liu. East Asian Regionalism: Theoretical Perspective, in Fu-Kuo liu and Philippe Regnier, Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting[M]. London: Routledgecurzon, 2003.
[14] Helge Hveem. Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalization, in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill (eds). Political Economy and the Changing Global Order[M], Oxford University press, 2000.
[15] Edward D. Mansfield, Helen V. Milner. The Political Economy of Regionalism: an Overview, in their co-edited The Political Economy of Regionalism[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
[16] Paul Bowles. Regionalism and development after the global financial crisis[J]. New Political Economy, 2000.(3)5.
[17] Peter Robson. The Economics of International Integration[M]. London: Routleedge, 1998.