外商直接投资与环境问题研究
|
摘要
发源于欧洲大陆的工业革命把人类社会推入了一个飞速发展的阶段。工业化进程深入同时伴随着自然资源的过度消耗和环境的严重污染,导致了诸多全球性环境的问题,如水资源危机、臭氧层被破坏、温室效应、生物物种的迅速减少等等,对人类的生存和可持续发展提出了严重挑战。在国际经济领域,人们日益关注贸易和国际资本流动对环境的影响,并由此衍生出“污染庇护所”等假说。
1978年以来市场导向型的经济改革逐步把中国变成了对外商直接投资最具吸引力的国家之一。二十世纪九十年代,中国仅次于美国,成为世界上第二大吸收外商直接投资的国家和吸引外商直接投资最多的发展中国家。在接近三十年的经济改革过程中,中国总共吸收了五万亿美元的外商直接投资。而外商直接投资作为中国经济增长的重要引擎,在上世纪九十年代,对中国经济增长的贡献率平均达到了2.3个百分点。
与此同时,我国的环境状况日益恶化。目前,全世界十个污染最严重的城市中有六个在中国,46.5%的河流受到污染,10.6%的河流严重污染,90%以上的城市水域污染严重,三亿多中国人饮用水达不到卫生标准。世界卫生组织2006年发布的一份报告说,有大约74%的中国人居住在空气品质不良的地区。
外商直接投资与环境恶化指标的同步增长促使人们考虑两者之间的相关性,在理论上进行探讨,在实践中也需要正确的政策设计来解决相关问题。
从实践上讲,认清外商直接投资与环境之间的关系,对促进我国国民经济健康、快速和稳定的发展,对实现环境友好型和资源节约型发展模式的重大转变,使国民经济走上一条可持续发展发展之路具有重大的实践意义。在理论上探讨外商直接投资与环境问题,对丰富和完善国际经济学和国民经济学的相关内容具有重要意义。首先,目前有关外商直接投资与环境之间的研究仍然存在很多空白,在研究对象、研究工具和方法的选择上仍有很多不确定之处。次之,对外商直接投资与环境问题进行研究,需要综合借鉴国际经济学、环境经济学、规制经济学等学科的理论知识,需要在可持续发展的大框架对该问题进行深入思考,才能提出科学可行的政策建议。因此,该研究为借鉴其他学科的理论成果提供了良好的实践机会。
通过对外商直接投资与环境相关文献的梳理,发现关于该问题的理论解释存在两种截然不同的理论观点和政策建议。研究同时发现,尽管几十年来,尽管外商直接投资在我国得到足够的重视,但是对其环境影响的研究却寥寥无及,不成体系,远远落后于发达国家的研究水平。因此,论文首先对国内外相关文献进行了细致的梳理,找出了它们之间的分歧,发现了研究的方向。
然后,论文对外商直接投资与环境问题从宏观和微观两个角度进行了一般性的分析。在上述基础之上,作为论文的重点之一,适用国际生产折衷理论对外商直接投资的环境行为进行分析,发现外商直接投资自身存在进行自我规制、实现企业竞争优势的内在动机。论文接着论述了外商直接投资对东道国环境规制的影响和促使外商直接投资正面环境效应放大的国际政策工具选择,指出,在国际协调得当和东道国腐败程度减弱的情况下,外商直接投资会产生正面的环境效应。
改革开放以来,我国政府对经济增长的过度追求,和由此导致的各地区之间对外商直接投资的激烈竞争,再加上资源利用制度、环境保护的不完善及其执行力度的欠缺,以及投资来源的特殊性(主要来自港澳地区)等等,都决定了我国肯定是一个研究的特例。因此,论文对我国外商直接投资的决定因素,特别是外商直接投资与环境规制之间的关系进行了实证研究,得出了外商直接投资与环境规制之间互为因果关系的结论。
在上述研究的基础上,论文最后提出了消除外商直接投资负面环境效应的一揽子解决方案,即国际规制、东道国规制、母国规制、企业自身规制和民间规制的相结合才是解决问题的唯一出路。
本文以马克思辩证唯物主义为指导,坚持理论与实践相结合,坚持定性分析与定量分析相结合,采用了规范分析与实证分析相结合的方法。以现代经济学理论为主要理论依据,如国民经济学、可持续发展经济学、环境经济学、规制经济学、福利经济学、博弈论与计量经济学等,并合理吸收与借鉴了其他学科的理论成果,如生态经济学和公共管理学等。
首先,本文采用理论借鉴的方法,适用国际生产折衷理论,较全面地从理论角度对外商直接投资企业的环境行为进行分析研究,得出了与国际贸易理论和生态经济学等截然不同的观点,辩证地看待和分析了相关问题。论文借鉴前人的研究成果,使用微观经济学和博弈论等学科的分析工具,分析了最优国际政策工具的选择以及腐败在弱化东道国环境规制力度中的作用。论文应用计量经济工具,详尽研究了我国外商直接投资的决定因素,特别是环境规制与外商直接投资之间的关系,得出两者之间互为因果的结论。
论文采用理论与实证相结合的方法对相关问题进行了研究,并得出了符合马克思主义唯物辩证观的结论。
论文创新之处在于有三点。首先,在梳理前人理论研究的基础上,应用国际生产折衷理论,从跨国公司污染生产转移和海外子公司环境行为的角度,对外商直接投资的环境业绩进行了评估和解析,认为跨国公司具有实行环境质量的跨境生产以取得生产和营销优势的内在动机。在后续的模型分析中也发现,只要包括东道国和母国两方面在内的政策工具选择适当,外商直接投资会对环境的改善起到积极的促进作用。
次之,论文结合中国的具体国情和经济发展阶段,采集了1987—2005年中国大陆连续19年的数据,以FDI流入量作为被解释变量,以经济发展水平、劳动力成本、工业三废排放和能源生产为辅助变量,系统地研究了外商直接投资与环境规制之间的关系。研究发现,环境规制与外商直接投资之间互为因果关系。环境规制力度的加大会对外商直接投资的流入产生阻碍作用,外商直接投资流入的增加也会促使一国加大环境规制的力度。
最后,论文系统地提出了针对外商直接投资的环境规制框架设计方案,特别是针对发展中国家的不足,提出消除腐败因素,国际规制、东道国规制、母国规制、民间规制和企业自我规制相结合的一整套规制方案,以使外商直接投资的正面环境效应得到最大化实现。
当然,论文的仍有很多不足之处有待完善和进一步探索。对外商直接投资的环境问题进行研究其实离不开可持续发展这个大的框架,跨国公司对自己的环境行为负责其实就是对社会负责,所以,企业的环境管理和社会责任是相辅相成的。外商直接投资的环境行为,社会责任的履行及其对可持续发展的贡献是作者未来的研究方向。同时,统计数据在一定程度上的失真肯定会对论文结论产生影响,而我国的复杂国情,特别是各地区之间的巨大差异也决定了论文的结论不一定具有普遍的指导意义。
The Industrial Revolution originated from Europe has promoted the human society into a rapid development phase, and the deepening of industrialization has been accompanied by the over-consumption of natural resources and the severe environmental pollution, thus resulting in such global environmental issues as water resources crisis, the depletion of ozone layer, the greenhouse effect and the extincton of bio-species, which has posed a serious threat to the survival of human beings and its sustainable development. In the field of international economics, people began to pay attention to the impact of international trade and capital flows on the environment, and gave rise to the Polluton Havens Hypothesis and so on.
The post-1978 market-oriented economic reforms in China have turned the country into one that is most attractive to foreign direct investment (FDI). In 1990s, China is second to the United States in the world and No. 1 among developing countries in attracting FDI. In its thirty years' development, the accumulated foreign capital into China has reached $5000 billion. As the key engine in promoting economic growth, the average contribution ratio of FDI China's economic growth has reaced 2.3% in 1990s.
At the same time, China's environment has been worsening. At present, out of the ten most heaviely polluted cities in the world, six are in China. In China, 46.5% of rivers are polluted and 10.6% of them have been seriously polluted, more than 90% of urban waters are severely polluted and 300 million citizens are drinking water below healthy standards. According to the report by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2006, about 74% of Chinese citizens live in air-polluted ares.
The simultaneous rise of FDI and environment deterioraton index stimulated people to ponder on the correaltion between the two phenomena both theoretically and practically in order to formulate feasible policy designs to solve the problem if it were.
It is practically significant to identify the correlation between Foreign Direct Investment and Environment for both the realization of the national economy's healthy, rapid and sustainable development and its transition towards the environmentally friendly and reources-saving development path. To probe into the issue theoretically is helpful in enriching and perfecting relevant research fields in both national economics and international economics. First of all, there are still many fields left unresearched in the above-mentioned issue and there still exist uncertainties in research objectives, research tools and research methodology. Secondly, to research into the issue of FDI and Environment, it is necessary to refer to and apply comprehensively such relevant subjects as international economics, environment economics,and regulation economics etc. and to ponder over it against the framework of sustainable development for the formulation of scientific and feasible policy proposals. The study thus provides a perfect opportunity to learn from the theoretical achievements of other subjects.
After reviwing relevant literature on FDI and Environment, it is found that there exist two controversal groups of theoretical viewpoints and policy proposals. Although enough attention has been paid to the attraction of FDI in China, scarecely has any systematic research been found on the environmental effect of FDI, which is far behind those in developed countries. So, a careful literature reviw has been carried out first to find out the discrepancies and research objectives.
Then, a general analysis is done on the issue from both macroeconomic and microeconomic perspectivesthe, on the basis of which a Eclectic Paradigm perspective is applied to study the environmental effect of FDI. It is found that there exist strong incentives for FDI enterprises to impose self-regulation for purpose of realizing corporate competitive advantages. After that, the impact of FDI on environment and the optimal international policy instrument composite on the issue is described and analyzed with the conclusion that on the premises of proper international coordination and the corruption level decline in the host country, the positve environmental effect of FDI will be exerted.
Since China adopted its open-door policy, the government exerted great enthusiasm in the pursuit of economic growth, which contributes to the competition for FDI in different areas, together with the imperfect reources use systems, improper envrionment protection institutions and their inefficient implementation, in additoin to the special sources of FDI (mainly from Hong Kong and Macao), all determine that China is surely a special case to study. Therefore, the paper probes into the decisive favctors on FDI and an empirical study on the correlationship between FDI and environmental regulation is carried out with the conclusion that FDI and environment are mutually causual to each other.
The paper finally concludes with the package of solutions to erase the negative environmental effect of FD1, that is, the combination of international regulation, host country regulation, home country regulation, corporate self-regulation and civil regulation is the only way out.
The paper is guided by Marxist dialectical materialism, adheres to the combination both of theories and pratices and of quantative analysis and qualitative analysis, applies normative and empirical methods, bases itself on such modern economic theories as those in national economics, sustainable development economics, environment economics, regulation economics, welfare economics, game theory and econometrics, and properly absorbes and refers to theories in other subjects, such as ecological economics and public administration.
Firsrt of all, the paper applies the theory of eclectic paradigm to study comprehensively the environmental impact of FDI enterprises, drawing the distinctively different conclusions from those of international trade and ecological economics. So the issue has been studied and analyzed dialectically and objectively. The paper refers to the analytical tools in microeconomics and game theory, probes into the optimal option of international policy instruments and also the role that corruption plays in weakending host country's environmental regualtion efforts. The paper also applies econometric tools to study empirically the decisive factors on FDI in China, expecially the relationship between FDI and environment regualtion with the conclusion that the two are mutually causual.
The paper combines theorectical methods and empirical methods together to study the relevant issue and its conclusion is in coherence with those of Marxist dialectical materialism.
The innovation of the paper lies in three points. Firstly, on the basis of literature review, the paper applies eclectic paradigm theory to analyze and evaluate the environmental effect of FDI from the perspectives of both Multinational Corporation's (MNCs) pollution production transfer and the environmental behavior of their overseas subsidiaris, concludes that MNCs have strong incentives to carry out the transboundary production of environmental quality and thus achieving production and marketing advantages. It is also found in subsequent model analysis that FDI will contribute to the improvement of environment if a proper package of policy instruments is applied, including those of both host and home countryies'.
Secondly, the paper takes into consideration China-specific conditions and its special development stage, collects the consecutive nineteen years' data from 1987 to 2005, with the FDI inflow as the explanatory variable and with economic development level, laobor cost, three industrial wastes emission and reources production as auxiliary variables, systematically probes into the relationship between FDI and environmental regulation, with the finding that environmental regulation and FDI are mutually causal to each other. The enhancement of environmental regulation will hinder the inflow of FDI and the inflow of FDI will also reinforce one country's environmental regulation.
Lastly, the paper brings forth a systematic package of regulatory framework design. With special reference to FDI's neagtive environmental effect in developing countries, the paper puts forward the scheme of deleting corruption and combining international regulation, host country regulation, home country regulation, civil regulation and corporate self-regulation in order to maximize FDI's positive environmental effect.
Of course, there are still drawbacks in the paper to perfected and further probed into. Actually, the study on the environmental effect of FDI can never depart from the context of sustainable development. MNCs' environmenta behavior and social accountability are equivalent and in consistency with each other. FDI's environmental behavior, its social accountability and their contribution to sustainable development will be the author's future reseach field. At the same time, the inaccuracy of statistics and China's complex conditions, especially the great differences among ares will surely have impact on the paper's conclusions and their universal guidance on the issue.
1978年以来市场导向型的经济改革逐步把中国变成了对外商直接投资最具吸引力的国家之一。二十世纪九十年代,中国仅次于美国,成为世界上第二大吸收外商直接投资的国家和吸引外商直接投资最多的发展中国家。在接近三十年的经济改革过程中,中国总共吸收了五万亿美元的外商直接投资。而外商直接投资作为中国经济增长的重要引擎,在上世纪九十年代,对中国经济增长的贡献率平均达到了2.3个百分点。
与此同时,我国的环境状况日益恶化。目前,全世界十个污染最严重的城市中有六个在中国,46.5%的河流受到污染,10.6%的河流严重污染,90%以上的城市水域污染严重,三亿多中国人饮用水达不到卫生标准。世界卫生组织2006年发布的一份报告说,有大约74%的中国人居住在空气品质不良的地区。
外商直接投资与环境恶化指标的同步增长促使人们考虑两者之间的相关性,在理论上进行探讨,在实践中也需要正确的政策设计来解决相关问题。
从实践上讲,认清外商直接投资与环境之间的关系,对促进我国国民经济健康、快速和稳定的发展,对实现环境友好型和资源节约型发展模式的重大转变,使国民经济走上一条可持续发展发展之路具有重大的实践意义。在理论上探讨外商直接投资与环境问题,对丰富和完善国际经济学和国民经济学的相关内容具有重要意义。首先,目前有关外商直接投资与环境之间的研究仍然存在很多空白,在研究对象、研究工具和方法的选择上仍有很多不确定之处。次之,对外商直接投资与环境问题进行研究,需要综合借鉴国际经济学、环境经济学、规制经济学等学科的理论知识,需要在可持续发展的大框架对该问题进行深入思考,才能提出科学可行的政策建议。因此,该研究为借鉴其他学科的理论成果提供了良好的实践机会。
通过对外商直接投资与环境相关文献的梳理,发现关于该问题的理论解释存在两种截然不同的理论观点和政策建议。研究同时发现,尽管几十年来,尽管外商直接投资在我国得到足够的重视,但是对其环境影响的研究却寥寥无及,不成体系,远远落后于发达国家的研究水平。因此,论文首先对国内外相关文献进行了细致的梳理,找出了它们之间的分歧,发现了研究的方向。
然后,论文对外商直接投资与环境问题从宏观和微观两个角度进行了一般性的分析。在上述基础之上,作为论文的重点之一,适用国际生产折衷理论对外商直接投资的环境行为进行分析,发现外商直接投资自身存在进行自我规制、实现企业竞争优势的内在动机。论文接着论述了外商直接投资对东道国环境规制的影响和促使外商直接投资正面环境效应放大的国际政策工具选择,指出,在国际协调得当和东道国腐败程度减弱的情况下,外商直接投资会产生正面的环境效应。
改革开放以来,我国政府对经济增长的过度追求,和由此导致的各地区之间对外商直接投资的激烈竞争,再加上资源利用制度、环境保护的不完善及其执行力度的欠缺,以及投资来源的特殊性(主要来自港澳地区)等等,都决定了我国肯定是一个研究的特例。因此,论文对我国外商直接投资的决定因素,特别是外商直接投资与环境规制之间的关系进行了实证研究,得出了外商直接投资与环境规制之间互为因果关系的结论。
在上述研究的基础上,论文最后提出了消除外商直接投资负面环境效应的一揽子解决方案,即国际规制、东道国规制、母国规制、企业自身规制和民间规制的相结合才是解决问题的唯一出路。
本文以马克思辩证唯物主义为指导,坚持理论与实践相结合,坚持定性分析与定量分析相结合,采用了规范分析与实证分析相结合的方法。以现代经济学理论为主要理论依据,如国民经济学、可持续发展经济学、环境经济学、规制经济学、福利经济学、博弈论与计量经济学等,并合理吸收与借鉴了其他学科的理论成果,如生态经济学和公共管理学等。
首先,本文采用理论借鉴的方法,适用国际生产折衷理论,较全面地从理论角度对外商直接投资企业的环境行为进行分析研究,得出了与国际贸易理论和生态经济学等截然不同的观点,辩证地看待和分析了相关问题。论文借鉴前人的研究成果,使用微观经济学和博弈论等学科的分析工具,分析了最优国际政策工具的选择以及腐败在弱化东道国环境规制力度中的作用。论文应用计量经济工具,详尽研究了我国外商直接投资的决定因素,特别是环境规制与外商直接投资之间的关系,得出两者之间互为因果的结论。
论文采用理论与实证相结合的方法对相关问题进行了研究,并得出了符合马克思主义唯物辩证观的结论。
论文创新之处在于有三点。首先,在梳理前人理论研究的基础上,应用国际生产折衷理论,从跨国公司污染生产转移和海外子公司环境行为的角度,对外商直接投资的环境业绩进行了评估和解析,认为跨国公司具有实行环境质量的跨境生产以取得生产和营销优势的内在动机。在后续的模型分析中也发现,只要包括东道国和母国两方面在内的政策工具选择适当,外商直接投资会对环境的改善起到积极的促进作用。
次之,论文结合中国的具体国情和经济发展阶段,采集了1987—2005年中国大陆连续19年的数据,以FDI流入量作为被解释变量,以经济发展水平、劳动力成本、工业三废排放和能源生产为辅助变量,系统地研究了外商直接投资与环境规制之间的关系。研究发现,环境规制与外商直接投资之间互为因果关系。环境规制力度的加大会对外商直接投资的流入产生阻碍作用,外商直接投资流入的增加也会促使一国加大环境规制的力度。
最后,论文系统地提出了针对外商直接投资的环境规制框架设计方案,特别是针对发展中国家的不足,提出消除腐败因素,国际规制、东道国规制、母国规制、民间规制和企业自我规制相结合的一整套规制方案,以使外商直接投资的正面环境效应得到最大化实现。
当然,论文的仍有很多不足之处有待完善和进一步探索。对外商直接投资的环境问题进行研究其实离不开可持续发展这个大的框架,跨国公司对自己的环境行为负责其实就是对社会负责,所以,企业的环境管理和社会责任是相辅相成的。外商直接投资的环境行为,社会责任的履行及其对可持续发展的贡献是作者未来的研究方向。同时,统计数据在一定程度上的失真肯定会对论文结论产生影响,而我国的复杂国情,特别是各地区之间的巨大差异也决定了论文的结论不一定具有普遍的指导意义。
The Industrial Revolution originated from Europe has promoted the human society into a rapid development phase, and the deepening of industrialization has been accompanied by the over-consumption of natural resources and the severe environmental pollution, thus resulting in such global environmental issues as water resources crisis, the depletion of ozone layer, the greenhouse effect and the extincton of bio-species, which has posed a serious threat to the survival of human beings and its sustainable development. In the field of international economics, people began to pay attention to the impact of international trade and capital flows on the environment, and gave rise to the Polluton Havens Hypothesis and so on.
The post-1978 market-oriented economic reforms in China have turned the country into one that is most attractive to foreign direct investment (FDI). In 1990s, China is second to the United States in the world and No. 1 among developing countries in attracting FDI. In its thirty years' development, the accumulated foreign capital into China has reached $5000 billion. As the key engine in promoting economic growth, the average contribution ratio of FDI China's economic growth has reaced 2.3% in 1990s.
At the same time, China's environment has been worsening. At present, out of the ten most heaviely polluted cities in the world, six are in China. In China, 46.5% of rivers are polluted and 10.6% of them have been seriously polluted, more than 90% of urban waters are severely polluted and 300 million citizens are drinking water below healthy standards. According to the report by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2006, about 74% of Chinese citizens live in air-polluted ares.
The simultaneous rise of FDI and environment deterioraton index stimulated people to ponder on the correaltion between the two phenomena both theoretically and practically in order to formulate feasible policy designs to solve the problem if it were.
It is practically significant to identify the correlation between Foreign Direct Investment and Environment for both the realization of the national economy's healthy, rapid and sustainable development and its transition towards the environmentally friendly and reources-saving development path. To probe into the issue theoretically is helpful in enriching and perfecting relevant research fields in both national economics and international economics. First of all, there are still many fields left unresearched in the above-mentioned issue and there still exist uncertainties in research objectives, research tools and research methodology. Secondly, to research into the issue of FDI and Environment, it is necessary to refer to and apply comprehensively such relevant subjects as international economics, environment economics,and regulation economics etc. and to ponder over it against the framework of sustainable development for the formulation of scientific and feasible policy proposals. The study thus provides a perfect opportunity to learn from the theoretical achievements of other subjects.
After reviwing relevant literature on FDI and Environment, it is found that there exist two controversal groups of theoretical viewpoints and policy proposals. Although enough attention has been paid to the attraction of FDI in China, scarecely has any systematic research been found on the environmental effect of FDI, which is far behind those in developed countries. So, a careful literature reviw has been carried out first to find out the discrepancies and research objectives.
Then, a general analysis is done on the issue from both macroeconomic and microeconomic perspectivesthe, on the basis of which a Eclectic Paradigm perspective is applied to study the environmental effect of FDI. It is found that there exist strong incentives for FDI enterprises to impose self-regulation for purpose of realizing corporate competitive advantages. After that, the impact of FDI on environment and the optimal international policy instrument composite on the issue is described and analyzed with the conclusion that on the premises of proper international coordination and the corruption level decline in the host country, the positve environmental effect of FDI will be exerted.
Since China adopted its open-door policy, the government exerted great enthusiasm in the pursuit of economic growth, which contributes to the competition for FDI in different areas, together with the imperfect reources use systems, improper envrionment protection institutions and their inefficient implementation, in additoin to the special sources of FDI (mainly from Hong Kong and Macao), all determine that China is surely a special case to study. Therefore, the paper probes into the decisive favctors on FDI and an empirical study on the correlationship between FDI and environmental regulation is carried out with the conclusion that FDI and environment are mutually causual to each other.
The paper finally concludes with the package of solutions to erase the negative environmental effect of FD1, that is, the combination of international regulation, host country regulation, home country regulation, corporate self-regulation and civil regulation is the only way out.
The paper is guided by Marxist dialectical materialism, adheres to the combination both of theories and pratices and of quantative analysis and qualitative analysis, applies normative and empirical methods, bases itself on such modern economic theories as those in national economics, sustainable development economics, environment economics, regulation economics, welfare economics, game theory and econometrics, and properly absorbes and refers to theories in other subjects, such as ecological economics and public administration.
Firsrt of all, the paper applies the theory of eclectic paradigm to study comprehensively the environmental impact of FDI enterprises, drawing the distinctively different conclusions from those of international trade and ecological economics. So the issue has been studied and analyzed dialectically and objectively. The paper refers to the analytical tools in microeconomics and game theory, probes into the optimal option of international policy instruments and also the role that corruption plays in weakending host country's environmental regualtion efforts. The paper also applies econometric tools to study empirically the decisive factors on FDI in China, expecially the relationship between FDI and environment regualtion with the conclusion that the two are mutually causual.
The paper combines theorectical methods and empirical methods together to study the relevant issue and its conclusion is in coherence with those of Marxist dialectical materialism.
The innovation of the paper lies in three points. Firstly, on the basis of literature review, the paper applies eclectic paradigm theory to analyze and evaluate the environmental effect of FDI from the perspectives of both Multinational Corporation's (MNCs) pollution production transfer and the environmental behavior of their overseas subsidiaris, concludes that MNCs have strong incentives to carry out the transboundary production of environmental quality and thus achieving production and marketing advantages. It is also found in subsequent model analysis that FDI will contribute to the improvement of environment if a proper package of policy instruments is applied, including those of both host and home countryies'.
Secondly, the paper takes into consideration China-specific conditions and its special development stage, collects the consecutive nineteen years' data from 1987 to 2005, with the FDI inflow as the explanatory variable and with economic development level, laobor cost, three industrial wastes emission and reources production as auxiliary variables, systematically probes into the relationship between FDI and environmental regulation, with the finding that environmental regulation and FDI are mutually causal to each other. The enhancement of environmental regulation will hinder the inflow of FDI and the inflow of FDI will also reinforce one country's environmental regulation.
Lastly, the paper brings forth a systematic package of regulatory framework design. With special reference to FDI's neagtive environmental effect in developing countries, the paper puts forward the scheme of deleting corruption and combining international regulation, host country regulation, home country regulation, civil regulation and corporate self-regulation in order to maximize FDI's positive environmental effect.
Of course, there are still drawbacks in the paper to perfected and further probed into. Actually, the study on the environmental effect of FDI can never depart from the context of sustainable development. MNCs' environmenta behavior and social accountability are equivalent and in consistency with each other. FDI's environmental behavior, its social accountability and their contribution to sustainable development will be the author's future reseach field. At the same time, the inaccuracy of statistics and China's complex conditions, especially the great differences among ares will surely have impact on the paper's conclusions and their universal guidance on the issue.
引文
1. A. Ades, R. Di Telia, 1999, Rents, competition and corruption, Amer. Econ. Rev [J], 89,982-993.
2. Abicourco, 1997, Boletim Statistico de Couro, Novo Hamburgo, Brazil.
3. Adams, Jan., 1997a, Environmental Policy and Competitiveness in a Globalised Economy: Conceptual Issues and a Review of the Empirical Evidence, In OECD.
4. Adams, Jan., 1999, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: The Role of Voluntary Corporate Environmental Management, Paper Presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28-29, The Hague, Netherlands.
5. Aliyu, Mohammed Aminu, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Pollution Haven Hypothesis Revisited .Paper prepared for the Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany, June 9-11, 2005 https://www. gtap. agecon. purdue. edu/resources/download/2131. pdf
6. Antweiler, A, B. Copeland and M. Taylor, 2001, Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? , American Economic Review [J], 91, 877-908.
7. Barrett, Scott, and Kathryn Graddy, 2000, Freedom, Growth, and the Environment, Environment and Development Economics [J], 5,433-456.
8. Bartik, T. J, 1988, The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Business Location in the United States. Growth and Change [J], 19, 22-44.
9. Barton, J. R. Jul., 1999,Environmental Regulations, Globalization of Production and Technological Change in the Iron and Steel Sector, Paper Presented at a Conference on Environmental Regulations, Globalization of Production and Technological Change, University of East Anglia, 1-2.
10. Beers, Van, and Bergh, Van den, 1997, An Empirical Multicountry Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Trade Flows, Kyklos [J], 50, 29-46.
11. Benidickson, J., G. B. Doern and N. Olewiler, 1994, Getting the Green Light: Environmental Regulation and Investment in Canada, Policy Study [J], 22, Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute.
12. Bhagwati and Jadgish, On Thinking Clearly About the Linkage Between Trade and the Environment, in The Wind of the Hundred Days: How Washington Mismanaged Globalization [M], MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
13. Bhagwati, Jadgish, and T. N. Srinivasan, 1996, Trade and the Environment: Does Environmental Diversity Detract from the Case for Free Trade, in Fair Trade and Harmonization[M], Vol. 1: Economic Analysis, edited by Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert Hudec, MIT Press, Cambridge, 159-223.
14. Birdsall, N. and D. Wheeler, 1993, Trade policy and Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment and Development [J], 2(1), 137-149.
15. Blackman, A. and Wu, X, 1998, Foreign Direct Investment in China' s Power Sector: Trends, Benefits and Barriers, Discussion Paper, 98-50, Washington D. C, Resources for the Future, September.
16. Blazeiczak, J, 1993, Environmental Policies and Foreign Investment: the Case of Germany, Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness, OECD, Paris.
17. Bouman, M. 1996, Do Pollution Abatement Costs Induce Direct Foreign Investments? Evidence for Germany, Mimeo: University of Amsterdam.
18. Bradford, David, Rebecca Schlieckert and Stephen Shore, 2000, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification, NBER Working Paper NO. 8001. Forthcoming, Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy.
19. Brandt, Loren and Susan Zhu (undated), FDI, Technology Transfer and Absorption in Shanghai, Department of Economics, University of Toronto, manuscript.
20. B. R. Copeland, 1994, International Trade and the Environment.-Policy Reform in a Polluted Small Open Economy, J. Environ. Econom. Management [J], 26, 44-65.
21. B. R. Copeland, 1996, Pollution Content Tariffs, Environmental Rent Shifting, and the Control of Cross-border Pollution, J. Int. Econom. [J], 40, 459-476.
22. B. R. Copeland and M. S. Taylor, 1997, A Simple Model of Trade, Capital Mobility, and the Environment, NBER Working Paper NO. 5898.
23. B. R. Copeland and M.S. Taylor, 1995, Trade and Transboundary Pollution, American Economic Review. [J], 85, 716-737.
24. Broadman, Harry and Xiaolun Sun, 1997, The Distribution of Foreign Investment in China, World Economy [J], 20, 339-361.
26. Cagatay, S. and H. Mihci, Sep., 2003a, Degree of Environmental Stringency and Impact on Trade Patterns Paper presented at The European Trade Study Group Conference, Madrid, 11-13.
27. C. C. Chao and E. Yu, 1999, Foreign Aid, the Environment, and Welfare, J. Dev. Econom. [J], 59, 553-564.
28. Charnovitz, Steve, 2002b, A World Environment Organization, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law [J], 27, NO. 2, 323-362.
29. Chaudhuri, Shubham, and Alexander Pfaff, 2002, Economic Growth and the Environment: What Can We Learn from Household Data? Columbia University, February.
30. Chenery, H. B. , and A. M. Strout, 1966, Foreign Assistance and Economic Development, American Economic Review [J], 56(3), 679-733.
31. Cheng, Leonard K. and Yum K. Kwan, 2000, What are the Determinants of the Location of Foreign Direct Investment? The Chinese Experience, Journal of International Economics [J], 51, 370-400.
32. Chichilniskly, G. 1994, North-South Trade and the Global Environment, American Economic Review [J], 84(4), 851-874.
33. Co, C. et al, 2004, Intellectual Property Rights, Environmental Regulation, and Foreign Direct Investment , Land Economics[J], 80(2), 153-173.
34. Cole, M. A, 2002, FDI and the Capital Intensity of "Dirty" Sectors: A Missing Piece of the Pollution Haven Puzzle, University of Manchester, Faculty of Social Science and Law, http://fssl. man. ac. uk/ses/research/macroseminar/Elliott. pdf
35. Cole, M. A. et al, 2004, Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations? Robert Mimeo, www. ruf. rice. edu/econ/seminars/04Micro/Fredrikksson. pdf
36. Copeland, Brian and M. Scott Taylor, 2003, Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence [M], Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Copeland, B. , and S. Taylor, 1994, North-South Trade and the Global Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 109,755-787.
38. Copeland, Brian, and M. Scott Taylor, 1995, Trade and the Environment: A Partial Synthesis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics [J], 77, 765-771.
39. Copeland, Brian, and M. Scott Taylor, Oct., 2001, International Trade and the Environment: A Framework for Analysis, NBER Working Paper NO. 8540.
40. Copeland, Brian, and M. Scott Taylor, Jul., 2003b, Trade, Growth and the Environment, NBER Working Paper NO. 9823.
41. Cosbey, A., 2002, The Trade, Investment and the Environment Interface, in Khan, R. S. (Ed) Trade and Environment, Zed, London.
42. Coughlin, Cletus, and Eran Segev, 2000, Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Spatial Econometric Study, World Economy [J], 23.
43. Coxhead, I. and S. Jayasuriya, 2003, Trade Liberalization, Resource Degradation and Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries, University of Melbourne, University of Melbourne, www. aae. wisc. edu/coxhead/courses/875/C&J-Lloyd. pdf.
44. Damania, R. et. al, 2003, Trade Liberalization, Corruption, and Environmental Policy Formation: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 46, 490-512.
45. Dasgupta, S. Hettige, H. and Wheeler, D. , 1998, What Improves Environmental Performance? Evidence from Mexican Industry, Policy Research Working Paper 1877, World Bank Development Research Group, January 1998.
46. Dasgupta, S. et. al, 1995, Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis, Policy Research Working Paper NO. 1448. Washington: World Bank.
47. Dean, J., 1998, Testing the Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment: Theory and Evidence, Chapter 4. in Fredriksson, Ed.
48. Dean, J. M. , 2002, Does Trade Liberalization Harm the Environment? A New Test, Canadian Journal of Economics [J], 35, 819-842.
49. Demurger, S., J. Sachs, W. T. Woo, S. Bao, and G. Chang, 2002, The Relative Contributions of Location and Preferential Policies in China' s Regional Development, China Economic Review[J], 13, 444-465.
50. Dixit, A. K. and V.Norman, Theory of International Trade [M], Cambridge University Press, 1980.
51. Dua, Andre, and Daniel Esty, 1997, Sustaining the Asia Pacific Miracle: Environmental Protection and Economic Integration, Institute for International Economics: Washington DC.
52. Duchiu, F. ET AL, 1995, Technological Change, Trade and the Environment, Ecological Economics [J], 14, 185-193.
53. Ederington, J. and J. Minier, 2001, Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analyis, mimeo, University of Miami.
54. Eiras, Ana, and Brett Schaefer, 2001, Trade: The Best Way to Protect the Environment, Backgrounder, The Heritage Foundation [J], NO. 1480, September 27.
55. Ekins, P, 1996, Can a Market Economy Produce Industrial Innovations that Lead to Environmental Sustainability? Paper presented at a Workshop on Innovation and Sustainable Development: Lessons for Innovation Policies? Fraunhofer Institute, Potsdam, Germany. November.
56. Environment Select Committee, 1996, World Trade and the Environment, HMSO, London.
57. Eskeland, G. S. and A. E. Harrison, 1997, Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-haven Hypothesis, World Bank Working Paper Series, NO. 1744.
58. Esty, D. C., 1995, Private Sector Foreign Investment and the Environment. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law [J], Vol. 4, Issue 2.
59. Esty, Daniel, 2001, Bridging the Trade-Environment Divide, Journal of Economic Perspectives [J], Summer 15, NO. 3, 113-130.
60. Esty, Daniel, and Bradford Gentry, 1997, Foreign Investment, Globalisation, and the Environment, Globalization and the Environment, edited by Tom Jones (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris).
61. Esty, Daniel, and Damien Giradin, 1998, Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness: A Conceptual Framework, Journal of World Trade [J], 32, NO. 3, June, 5-46.
62. Esty, D. C. and R. Mendelssohn, 1995, Powering China: The Environmental Implications of China' s Economic Growth. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
63. Esty, Daniel, and Michael Porter, 2001, Measuring National Environmental Performance and Its Determinants, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School, April.
64. Feng Helen Liang, Does Foreign Direct Investment Harm the Host Country' s Environment? Evidence from China, April 12, 2006. http://faculty, haas. berkeley. edu/fenliang/research/Pollution&FDI/FDI_Pollut ion. pdf
65. Fredriksson, P. G. et al, 2003, Bureaucratic Corruption, Environmental Policy and Inbound US FDI: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Public Economics [J], 87, 1407-1430.
66. Fung, K. C. 1997, Trade and Investment: Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan [M], Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
67. Fung, K. C., Hitorai Iizaka, and Stephen Parker, 2002, Determinants of U. S. and Japanese Direct Investment in China, Journal of Comparative Economics [J], 30, 567-578.
68. Fung, K. C., Hitomi Iizaka, Chelsea Lin, and Alan Siu, 2002, An Econometric Estimation of Locational Choices of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Hong Kong and U. S. Firms in China, University of California, Santa Cruz, manuscript.
69. GAO, Ting, 2002, Labor Quality and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from FDI in China by Investing Country, University of Missouri, manuscript.
70. Gentry, B.S., Jan., 1999, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Boon or Bane? Paper presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28-29, The Hague, Netherlands.
71. Gentry, B. S. et. al. 1996, Private capital flows and the environment: lessons from Latin America, mimeo, Yale Centre for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, Connecticut.
72. G. M. Grossman and A. B. Krueger, 1991, Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, NBER Working Paper,. NO. 3914.
73. Goldenman, G. Jan. , 1999,The Environmental Implications of Foreign Direct Investment: Policy and Institutional Issues, Paper presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28-29, The Hague, Netherlands.
74. Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger 1995, Economic Growth and the Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 110, 353-377.
75. G. Schulze, H. Ursprung, 2001, The Political Economy of International Trade and the Environment, in: G. Schulze, H. Ursprung, eds., International Environmental Economics: A Survey of the Issues[M], Oxford University Press, Oxford, 62-83.
76. Han, K. And J. B. Braden, 1996, Environment and Trade: New Evidence from U. S. Manufacturing. Mimeo.
77. Harbaugh, William, Arik Levinson, and David Wilson, May, 2000, Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve, NBER Working Paper NO. 7711.
78. Head, Keith and John Ries, 1996, Inter-City Competition for Foreign Investment: Static and Dynamic Effects of China' s Incentive Areas, Journal of Urban Economics [J], 40, 38-60.
79. Henley, John, Colin Kirkpatrick, and Georgina Wilde, 1999, Foreign Direct Investment in China: Recent Trends and Current Policy Issues, World Economy [J], 22, 223-243.
80. Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky, 1996, The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 30, 381-395.
81. Hettige, H. Huq, M. Pargal, S. and Wheeler, D, 1996, Determinants of Pollution Abatement in Developing Countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia, World Development [J], 24(12), 891-904.
82. Hilton, F. G. Hank, and Arik Levinson, 1998, Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Automotive Lead Emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 35, 126-141.
83. Jaffe, A. B. ET AL, 1993, Environmental Regulations and the Competitiveness of US Industry, Report prepared for Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington DC: US Dept. of Commerce.
84. Jaffe, A.B.ET AL, 1995, Environmental Regulations and International Competitiveness: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature [J], 33, 132-163.
85. J. Beghin, D. Roland-Hoist, and D. van der Mensbrugghe, 1997, Trade and pollution linkages: piecemeal policy reform and optimal intervention, Can. J. Econom. [J], 30, 442-455.
86. Jenkins, R, Jul., 1999, Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness-a Framework for Analysis, Paper presented at a Conference on Environmental Regulations, Globalisation of Production and Technological Change, University of East Anglia, 1-2.
87. Jeppessen, T. et al, 2002, Environmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis, Journal of Regional Science [J], 42(1), 19-49.
88. J. Merrifield, 1988, The Impact of Selected Abatement Strategies on Transnational Pollution, the Terms of Trade, and Factor Rewards: A General Equilibrium Approach, J. Environ. Econom. Management, 15, 259-284.
89. Johal, S. and A. Ulph, 2002, Global Environmental Governance, Political Lobbying and Transboundary Pollution, In List, A. J. and A. de Zeeuw (eds), Recent Advances in Environmental Economics [J], Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 36-43.
90. Jones, 1997a, Globalisation and Environment: Main Issues. In OECD.
91. Johnstone, N., 1997, Globalisation, Technology and Environment, Globalisation and Environment: Preliminary Perspectives, OECD, Paris.
92. Judith M. Dean, Foreign Direct Investment and Pollution Havens Evaluating the Evidence from China http://hotdocs. usitc. gov/docs/pubs/research_working_papers/EC200401B. pdf
93. Keller, Wolfgang and Arik Levinson, 2002, Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to the U. S. States, Review of Economics and Statistic [J], 84, 691-703.
94. Khan, R. S, 2002, Trade Liberalization and the Environment: Northern and Southern Perspectives, in Khan, R. S. (ed) Trade and Environment, Zed, London.
95. Krueger, A, 1997, Trade Policy and Economic Development: How We Learn, American Economic Review [J], 87(1), 1-22.
96. Leonard, H. J, Pollution and the Struggle for the World Product: Multinational Corporations, Environment and International Comparative Advantage [M], Cambridge University Press, 1988.
97. Levinson, Arik and M. Scott Taylor, 2001, Trade and the Environment: Unmasking the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, manuscript, Georgetown University.
98. Levy, D. L, 1995, The Environmental Practices and Performance of Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations [J], Vol.4, NO. 1.
99. List, J. A. and C. Y. Co, 2000, The Effects of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment, Journal of Economics and Environmental Management [J], 40(1), 1-20.
100. Low, P. (ed), 1992, International Trade and the Environment, Discussion Paper 159, Washington DC: World Bank.
101. Low, P. and A. Yeats, 1992, Do Dirty Industries Migrate? In P. LOW
102. Lucas, R., P. Wheeler and H. Hettige, 1992, Economic Development, Environmental Regulation and International Migration of Toxic Pollution 1960-1988, In Low.
103. Lucas, R. , 1990, Why doesn' t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? American Economic Review [J], 80, 92-96.
104. Li Yan Yong et. al, Study on the Two-stage Model of Corporate FDI Strategy, Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Strategic Management.
105. MAI (Negotiating Group on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment), Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: an Overview of the Literature http://wwwl. oecd. org/daf/mai/pdf/ng/ng9733rle. pdf
106. Mani, M. and D. Wheeler, 1997, In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960-1995, Working Paper Series, Research Project on Social and Environmental Consequences of Growth-Oriented Policies. Washington DC: Policy Research Department, World Bank.
107. Mani, M. et al, 1997, Is There an Environmental Race to the Bottom? Evidence on the Role of Environmental Regulation in Plant Location Decisions in India, Policy and Research Department, Washington D. C., World Bank.
108. Mani, M. S., 1996, Environmental Tariffs on Polluting Imports: An Empirical Study, Environmental and Resource Economics [J], 7, 391-411.
109. Markusen, J. R, 1999, Location Choice, Environmental Quality and Public Policy, in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (ed) Handbook of Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
110. May, P. H. ET AL, 1996, International Private Finance and Sustainable Development: Policy Infrastructure. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: CPDA-UFRRJ mimeo.
111. Matthew A. Colea #, Robert J. R. Elliotta, Per G. Fredriksson, Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations? February 5, 2004 http://ideas, repec. org/a/bla/scandj/vl08y2006i1p157-178. html
112. Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and William Behrens, 1972, The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.
113. Michael W. Hansen. Cross Border Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations-an Analytical Framework. Occasional Paper NO. 5, Report as part of UNCTAD /CBS Project: Cross Border Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations, June 1999 http: //www. ikl. cbs. dk./departments/ikl/cbem
114. Millimet, D. L. and J. A. List, 2004, The Case of the Missing Pollution Haven Hypothesis, Annual Meeting Allied Social Science Associations, San Diego, CA, January 3-5. http://faculty.smu.edu/millimet/pdf/hetero.pdf.
115. Motta, M. and J. -F. Thiss, 1994, Does Environmental Dumping Lead to Dislocation, European Economic Review[J], 38, 563-576.
116. Muradian, Roldan, Martin 0' Connor and Joan Martinez-Alier, 2001, Embodied Pollution in Trade: Estimating the "Environmental Load Displacement" of Industrialized Countries, FEEM Working Paper NO. 57, July, Milan.
117. Neumayer, E., 2000, Trade and the Environment: A critical assessment and some suggestions for reconciliation, Environment and Natural Resources.
118. Neumayer, Eric, 2002, Does Trade Openness Promote Multilateral Environmental Cooperation? The World Economy [J], 25(6), 812-832.
119. Newell, P. 2001, Managing Multinational: The Governance of Investment for the Environment, Journal of International Development [J], 13(7), 907-919.
120. Nick Mabey and Richard McNally, Foreign Direct Investment and the environmentFrom pollution havens to sustainable development. A WWF-UK Report, July 1998
121. OECD, 1996, Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Co-operation. Paris: OECD.
122. OECD, 1997a, Globalisation and Environment: Preliminary Perspectives. Paris: OECD.
123. Olewiler, N., 1994, The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Investment. In BENIDICKSON ET AL.
124. Palmer, K et al, 1995, Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefits-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, [J], 9(4), 119-132.
125. Parson, Edward, 2002, protecting the Ozone Layer: Science, Strategy, and Negotiation in the Shaping of a Global Environmental Regime [M], Oxford University Press, forthcoming, 2002.
126. P. Bardhan, 1997, Corruption and Development: a Review of the Issues, J. Econ. Lit. [J], 35, 1320-1346.
127. P. Chander, L. Wilde, 1992, Corruption in Tax Administration, J. Public Econ. [J], 49(3), 333-349.
128. Pearson, C. S, 1987, Multinational Corporations, Environment, and the Third World. Durham [M], NC: Duke University Press, 3-31.
129. P. G. Fredriksson, 1997, The Political Economy of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy, J. Environ. Econ. Manage [J],33,44-58.
130. P.G.Fredriksson, 2003, Political Instability, Corruption and Policy Formation, the Case of Environmental Policy, J. Public Econ. [J], 87, 1383-1405.
131. P. Hatzipanayotou and M.S. Michael, 1995, Foreign Aid and Public Goods, J. Dev. Econom. [J], 47, 455-467.
132. P. Hatzipanayotou, S. Lahiri and M.S.Michael, 2002, Can Cross-border Pollution Reduce Pollution? Can. J. Econom. [J].
133. Porter, Michael, and Claas van der Linde, 1995, Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives [J], 9, NO. 4, 97-118.
134. Porter, M. E, 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. London: Macmillan.
135. Porter, M. E. and C. Van der linde, 1995a, Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review [J], September-October, 120-134.
136. Raspiller, S. and N. Riedinger, 2004, Do Environmental Regulations Influence the Location Behavior of French Firms? Paper Presented at the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the EAERE, Budapest, Hungary.
137. R. Damania, 2002, Environmental Controls with Corrupt Bureaucrats, Environ. Devel.Econ. [J], 7, 407-427.
138. R. Deacon, 2002, Dictatorship, Democracy and the Provision of Public Goods, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California at Santa Barbara.
139. Repetto, R. , 1995, Jobs, Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation: What are the Real Issues? Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
140. R. Ludema and I. Wooton, 1994, Cross-border Externalities and Trade Liberalization: the Strategic Control of Pollution, Can. J. Econom. [J], 27, 950-966.
141. R. Ludema and I. Wooton, 1997, International Trade Rules and Environmental Cooperation under Asymmetric Information, Int. Econom. Rev. [J], 38, 605-625.
142. Saint Paul, G, 1994, Trade Patterns and Pollution, Working Paper NO. 40, 94, Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
143. Schmidheiny, S. and B. S. Gentry, 1997, Privately Financed Sustainable Development, In D. C. Esty and M. Chertow (EDS.). Next Generation Environmental Policy [M], New Haven: Yale Press.
144. Selden, Thomas, and Daqing Song, 1994, Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 27, 147-162.
145. Selden, Thomas, and Daqing Song, 1995, Neoclassical Growth, the J Curve for Abatement, and the Inverted U Curve for Pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management[J], 29, 162-168.
146. Shafik, Nemat, 1994, Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers [J], 46, 757-773.
147. Shafik, N. and S. Bandyopadhyay, 1992, Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross Section Evidence, 1992 World Development Report Background Paper. Washington, D. C. , World Bank
148. Shuguang, Z., Z. Yansheng, and W. Zhongxin, 1998, Measuring the Cost of Protection in China. Washington, D. C. : Institute for International Economics.
149. Smarzynska, Beata K. and Shang-Jin Wei, 2001. Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment: Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?" NBER Working Paper NO. 8465.
150. Sorsa, P, 1994, Competitiveness and Environmental Standards: Some Exploratory Results, Policy Research Working Paper 1249, Washington DC: World Bank.
151. Tobey, J. A., 1990, The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test, Kyklos [J], 43,191-209.
152. Tobey, J. A. , 1993, The Impact of Domestic Environmental Policies on International Trade, In OECD.
153. U. Desai, Ecological Policy and Politics in Developing Countries: Economic Growth, Democracy and Environment [M], State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1998.
154. Ulrich J. Wagner, Christopher D. Timmins, Agglomeration Effects in Foreign Direct Investment and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, January 29, 2007 http://www. Columbia. edu/^uw210l/Wagner_Timmins_FDI. pdf
155. UNCTAD (UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT), 1993, Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations. New York: UNCTAD.
156. UNCTAD (UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT), 1995, World Investment Report 1995: Investment, Trade, and International Policy Arrangements. Geneva: UNCTAD.
157.Valerica Vlad and Sajal Lahiri.Foreign Investment and Environment in a North-South Model with Cross-border Pollution https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1850.pdf
158.Van Der Linde,C.,1993,Micro-economic Aspects of Environmental Policies and Competitiveness.In OECD.
159.Wheeler,D.andA.Mody,1992,International Investment Location Decisions:The Case of US Firms.Journal of International Economics[J],33,57-76.
160.W.Ascher,1999,Why Governments Waste Natural Resources:Policy Failures in Developing Countries[M],Johns Hopkins University Press,Baltimore,1999.
161.Yuqing Xing,Charles D.Kolstad,Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? Revised:August 2000http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=ucsb econ
162.Zamparutti,A.and J.Klavens,1993,Environment and Foreign Investment in Central and Eastern Europe:Results from a Survey of Western Corporations.In OECD.
163.Zarsky,Lyuba,1997a,Stuck in the Mud? Nation States,Globalisation and Environment,In OECD.
164.Zarsky,L.,1999,Havens,Halos and Spaghetti:Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment,Emerging Market Economy Forum,OECD.
165.曹萍,优化FDI产业结构减少其对我国环境的负面影响[J],企业家天地,2007年第1期。
166.曹秋菊,外商直接投资与我国生态环境安全问题研究[J],财经理论与实践(双月刊),2007年5月第147期。
167.曹晓蕾,外商直接投资的负面效应研究及评述[J],世界经济与政治论坛,2007年第5期。
168.陈红蕾,陈秋锋,“污染避难所”假说及其在中国的检验[J],暨南学报,2006年第4期。
169.陈愈,吴建伟,对我国招商引资中污染产业转移问题应予关注[J],商业研究,2003年第1期。
170.郭印,利用外国直接投资项目中的环境保护问题[J],甘肃社会科学,2004年第1期。
171.焦必方,环保型经济增长—21世纪中国的必然选择[M],上海:复旦大学出版社,2000年。
172.梁蓓,国际直接投资对自然环境的影响及我国的政策取向[J],对外经济贸易大学学报,2003年第5期。
173.梁从诫,2005年:中国的环境危局与突围[M],社会科学文献出版社,2006年。
174.李岚红,外商直接投资于我国高污染行业的现象分析[J],兰州商学院学报,2006年第6期。
175.林麟,污染产业转移的影响因素分析[D],硕士学位论文,北京:对外经济与贸易大学,2006年3月。
176.刘娇,洪河,中国环境污染状况备忘录[J],生态经济,2003年第1期。
177.刘淑琪,我国引进外资过程中的污染转移问题研究[J],山东财政学院学报,2001年第1期。
178.李延勇,国际生产宏观经济理论的环境涵义及政策启示[J],理论学刊,2006第2期。
179.李延勇,国际生产折衷理论的环境涵义[J],经济管理·新管理,2006年第6期。
180.李延勇,国际生产微观经济理论的环境涵义及政策启示[J],城市发展研究,2006年第4期。
181.李延勇,贸易与环境:对外贸易可持续发展的核心问题[J],枣庄学院学报,2006年第4期。
182.李延勇,跨境环境管理:跨国公司环境效应研究的新方向[J],技术经济与管理研究,2006年第6期。
183.李延勇,国际生产环境效应的微观经济理论分析[J],青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006年第4期。
184.李延勇,跨国公司环境效应的理论分析[J],国际贸易,2007年第2期。
185.李延勇,环境措施、社会责任与企业竞争优势[J],山东社会科学,2007年第8期。
186.李延勇,跨国公司与环境管理体系的扩散[J],山东经济,2007年第5期。
187.李延勇,跨国公司环境效应文献述评[J],东岳论丛,2007年第4期。
188.李延勇,跨国公司的跨境环境管理战略分析[J],改革与战略,2006年第12期。
189.马传栋,可持续发展经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2002年。
190.马传栋,生态经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1986年。
191.马传栋,资源生态经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1995年。
192.马传栋,城市经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1989年。
193.马传栋,论生态工业[J]经济研究,1991年第3期。
194.潘家华,可持续发展发展途径的经济学分析[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997年。
195.潘申彪等,江浙沪三省市外商直接投资与环境污染的因果关系检验[J],国际贸易问题,2005年第12期。
196.任丽娟,我国利用FDI项目中的环境保护问题[J],商场现代化,2007年第4期。
197.孙静,唐建荣,FDI与我国制造业中的污染转移[J],商场现代化,2006年第35期。
198.田东文,焦旸,污染密集型产业对华转移的区位决定因素分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006第8期。
199.王俊豪,政府管制经济学导论[M],北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
200.王雪,国际产业转移理论及其研究[J],山东工商学院学报,2007年第2期。
201.卫迎春,中国外商直接投资的结构研究[D],博士论文,武汉:华中科技大学,2005年5月。
202.吴玉鸣,环境规制与外商直接投资因果关系的实证分析[J],华东师范大学学报,2006年第1期。
203.夏友富,外商转移污染密集产业的对策研究[J],管理世界,1999年第3期。
204.谢姚刚,理性看待污染密集产业转移[J],国际贸易问题,2004年第11期。
205.许水平,赵兴,污染密集产业转移原因的经济学分析及防范措施建议[J],经济论坛,2004年第21期。
206.杨海生等,外商直接投资与环境库兹涅茨曲线[J],绿色经济,2006年第1期。
207.杨海生,贾佳,周永章,王树功,贸易、外商直接投资、经济增长与环境污染[J],中国人口·资源与环境,2005年第3期。
208.杨英,基于FDI的污染密集产业转移与环境福利效应研究—以东部沿海地区为例[D],硕士学位论文,杭州:浙江大学,2005年11月。
209.应瑞瑶,周力,外商直接投资、工业污染与环境规制—基于中国数据的计量经济学分析[J],财贸经济,2006年第1期。
210.于良春,自然垄断与政府规制[M],经济科学出版社,2003年。
211.张德强,外国直接投资与环境保护的冲突与融合—兼论我国如何平衡FDI与环境保护的关系[J],国际贸易问题,2007年第9期
212.张德强,谭晶荣,关于外商直接投资对我国环境库兹涅茨曲线的影响及优化途径分析[J],国际贸易问题,2006年第3期。
213.张连众等,贸易自由化对中国环境污染的影响分析[J],南开经济研究,2003年第3期
214.张梅,外商投资与我国环境保护问题初探[J],生态经济,2006年第3期。
215.张燕文,外商直接投资中的环境负效应与消解[J],求索,2006年第7期。
216.郑宇植,中国环境污染与投资、贸易、GDP的关系[D],博士论文,北京:对外经济与贸易大学,2001年5月。
217.朱作鑫,外商投资企业环境污染问题若干思考[J],广西政法管理干部学院学报,2004年第5期。
218.左玉辉,环境经济学[M],高等教育出版社。
219.2001-2006年中国统计年鉴。
2. Abicourco, 1997, Boletim Statistico de Couro, Novo Hamburgo, Brazil.
3. Adams, Jan., 1997a, Environmental Policy and Competitiveness in a Globalised Economy: Conceptual Issues and a Review of the Empirical Evidence, In OECD.
4. Adams, Jan., 1999, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: The Role of Voluntary Corporate Environmental Management, Paper Presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28-29, The Hague, Netherlands.
5. Aliyu, Mohammed Aminu, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Pollution Haven Hypothesis Revisited .Paper prepared for the Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany, June 9-11, 2005 https://www. gtap. agecon. purdue. edu/resources/download/2131. pdf
6. Antweiler, A, B. Copeland and M. Taylor, 2001, Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? , American Economic Review [J], 91, 877-908.
7. Barrett, Scott, and Kathryn Graddy, 2000, Freedom, Growth, and the Environment, Environment and Development Economics [J], 5,433-456.
8. Bartik, T. J, 1988, The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Business Location in the United States. Growth and Change [J], 19, 22-44.
9. Barton, J. R. Jul., 1999,Environmental Regulations, Globalization of Production and Technological Change in the Iron and Steel Sector, Paper Presented at a Conference on Environmental Regulations, Globalization of Production and Technological Change, University of East Anglia, 1-2.
10. Beers, Van, and Bergh, Van den, 1997, An Empirical Multicountry Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Trade Flows, Kyklos [J], 50, 29-46.
11. Benidickson, J., G. B. Doern and N. Olewiler, 1994, Getting the Green Light: Environmental Regulation and Investment in Canada, Policy Study [J], 22, Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute.
12. Bhagwati and Jadgish, On Thinking Clearly About the Linkage Between Trade and the Environment, in The Wind of the Hundred Days: How Washington Mismanaged Globalization [M], MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
13. Bhagwati, Jadgish, and T. N. Srinivasan, 1996, Trade and the Environment: Does Environmental Diversity Detract from the Case for Free Trade, in Fair Trade and Harmonization[M], Vol. 1: Economic Analysis, edited by Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert Hudec, MIT Press, Cambridge, 159-223.
14. Birdsall, N. and D. Wheeler, 1993, Trade policy and Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment and Development [J], 2(1), 137-149.
15. Blackman, A. and Wu, X, 1998, Foreign Direct Investment in China' s Power Sector: Trends, Benefits and Barriers, Discussion Paper, 98-50, Washington D. C, Resources for the Future, September.
16. Blazeiczak, J, 1993, Environmental Policies and Foreign Investment: the Case of Germany, Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness, OECD, Paris.
17. Bouman, M. 1996, Do Pollution Abatement Costs Induce Direct Foreign Investments? Evidence for Germany, Mimeo: University of Amsterdam.
18. Bradford, David, Rebecca Schlieckert and Stephen Shore, 2000, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification, NBER Working Paper NO. 8001. Forthcoming, Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy.
19. Brandt, Loren and Susan Zhu (undated), FDI, Technology Transfer and Absorption in Shanghai, Department of Economics, University of Toronto, manuscript.
20. B. R. Copeland, 1994, International Trade and the Environment.-Policy Reform in a Polluted Small Open Economy, J. Environ. Econom. Management [J], 26, 44-65.
21. B. R. Copeland, 1996, Pollution Content Tariffs, Environmental Rent Shifting, and the Control of Cross-border Pollution, J. Int. Econom. [J], 40, 459-476.
22. B. R. Copeland and M. S. Taylor, 1997, A Simple Model of Trade, Capital Mobility, and the Environment, NBER Working Paper NO. 5898.
23. B. R. Copeland and M.S. Taylor, 1995, Trade and Transboundary Pollution, American Economic Review. [J], 85, 716-737.
24. Broadman, Harry and Xiaolun Sun, 1997, The Distribution of Foreign Investment in China, World Economy [J], 20, 339-361.
26. Cagatay, S. and H. Mihci, Sep., 2003a, Degree of Environmental Stringency and Impact on Trade Patterns Paper presented at The European Trade Study Group Conference, Madrid, 11-13.
27. C. C. Chao and E. Yu, 1999, Foreign Aid, the Environment, and Welfare, J. Dev. Econom. [J], 59, 553-564.
28. Charnovitz, Steve, 2002b, A World Environment Organization, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law [J], 27, NO. 2, 323-362.
29. Chaudhuri, Shubham, and Alexander Pfaff, 2002, Economic Growth and the Environment: What Can We Learn from Household Data? Columbia University, February.
30. Chenery, H. B. , and A. M. Strout, 1966, Foreign Assistance and Economic Development, American Economic Review [J], 56(3), 679-733.
31. Cheng, Leonard K. and Yum K. Kwan, 2000, What are the Determinants of the Location of Foreign Direct Investment? The Chinese Experience, Journal of International Economics [J], 51, 370-400.
32. Chichilniskly, G. 1994, North-South Trade and the Global Environment, American Economic Review [J], 84(4), 851-874.
33. Co, C. et al, 2004, Intellectual Property Rights, Environmental Regulation, and Foreign Direct Investment , Land Economics[J], 80(2), 153-173.
34. Cole, M. A, 2002, FDI and the Capital Intensity of "Dirty" Sectors: A Missing Piece of the Pollution Haven Puzzle, University of Manchester, Faculty of Social Science and Law, http://fssl. man. ac. uk/ses/research/macroseminar/Elliott. pdf
35. Cole, M. A. et al, 2004, Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations? Robert Mimeo, www. ruf. rice. edu/econ/seminars/04Micro/Fredrikksson. pdf
36. Copeland, Brian and M. Scott Taylor, 2003, Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence [M], Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Copeland, B. , and S. Taylor, 1994, North-South Trade and the Global Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 109,755-787.
38. Copeland, Brian, and M. Scott Taylor, 1995, Trade and the Environment: A Partial Synthesis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics [J], 77, 765-771.
39. Copeland, Brian, and M. Scott Taylor, Oct., 2001, International Trade and the Environment: A Framework for Analysis, NBER Working Paper NO. 8540.
40. Copeland, Brian, and M. Scott Taylor, Jul., 2003b, Trade, Growth and the Environment, NBER Working Paper NO. 9823.
41. Cosbey, A., 2002, The Trade, Investment and the Environment Interface, in Khan, R. S. (Ed) Trade and Environment, Zed, London.
42. Coughlin, Cletus, and Eran Segev, 2000, Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Spatial Econometric Study, World Economy [J], 23.
43. Coxhead, I. and S. Jayasuriya, 2003, Trade Liberalization, Resource Degradation and Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries, University of Melbourne, University of Melbourne, www. aae. wisc. edu/coxhead/courses/875/C&J-Lloyd. pdf.
44. Damania, R. et. al, 2003, Trade Liberalization, Corruption, and Environmental Policy Formation: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 46, 490-512.
45. Dasgupta, S. Hettige, H. and Wheeler, D. , 1998, What Improves Environmental Performance? Evidence from Mexican Industry, Policy Research Working Paper 1877, World Bank Development Research Group, January 1998.
46. Dasgupta, S. et. al, 1995, Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis, Policy Research Working Paper NO. 1448. Washington: World Bank.
47. Dean, J., 1998, Testing the Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment: Theory and Evidence, Chapter 4. in Fredriksson, Ed.
48. Dean, J. M. , 2002, Does Trade Liberalization Harm the Environment? A New Test, Canadian Journal of Economics [J], 35, 819-842.
49. Demurger, S., J. Sachs, W. T. Woo, S. Bao, and G. Chang, 2002, The Relative Contributions of Location and Preferential Policies in China' s Regional Development, China Economic Review[J], 13, 444-465.
50. Dixit, A. K. and V.Norman, Theory of International Trade [M], Cambridge University Press, 1980.
51. Dua, Andre, and Daniel Esty, 1997, Sustaining the Asia Pacific Miracle: Environmental Protection and Economic Integration, Institute for International Economics: Washington DC.
52. Duchiu, F. ET AL, 1995, Technological Change, Trade and the Environment, Ecological Economics [J], 14, 185-193.
53. Ederington, J. and J. Minier, 2001, Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analyis, mimeo, University of Miami.
54. Eiras, Ana, and Brett Schaefer, 2001, Trade: The Best Way to Protect the Environment, Backgrounder, The Heritage Foundation [J], NO. 1480, September 27.
55. Ekins, P, 1996, Can a Market Economy Produce Industrial Innovations that Lead to Environmental Sustainability? Paper presented at a Workshop on Innovation and Sustainable Development: Lessons for Innovation Policies? Fraunhofer Institute, Potsdam, Germany. November.
56. Environment Select Committee, 1996, World Trade and the Environment, HMSO, London.
57. Eskeland, G. S. and A. E. Harrison, 1997, Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-haven Hypothesis, World Bank Working Paper Series, NO. 1744.
58. Esty, D. C., 1995, Private Sector Foreign Investment and the Environment. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law [J], Vol. 4, Issue 2.
59. Esty, Daniel, 2001, Bridging the Trade-Environment Divide, Journal of Economic Perspectives [J], Summer 15, NO. 3, 113-130.
60. Esty, Daniel, and Bradford Gentry, 1997, Foreign Investment, Globalisation, and the Environment, Globalization and the Environment, edited by Tom Jones (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris).
61. Esty, Daniel, and Damien Giradin, 1998, Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness: A Conceptual Framework, Journal of World Trade [J], 32, NO. 3, June, 5-46.
62. Esty, D. C. and R. Mendelssohn, 1995, Powering China: The Environmental Implications of China' s Economic Growth. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
63. Esty, Daniel, and Michael Porter, 2001, Measuring National Environmental Performance and Its Determinants, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School, April.
64. Feng Helen Liang, Does Foreign Direct Investment Harm the Host Country' s Environment? Evidence from China, April 12, 2006. http://faculty, haas. berkeley. edu/fenliang/research/Pollution&FDI/FDI_Pollut ion. pdf
65. Fredriksson, P. G. et al, 2003, Bureaucratic Corruption, Environmental Policy and Inbound US FDI: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Public Economics [J], 87, 1407-1430.
66. Fung, K. C. 1997, Trade and Investment: Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan [M], Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
67. Fung, K. C., Hitorai Iizaka, and Stephen Parker, 2002, Determinants of U. S. and Japanese Direct Investment in China, Journal of Comparative Economics [J], 30, 567-578.
68. Fung, K. C., Hitomi Iizaka, Chelsea Lin, and Alan Siu, 2002, An Econometric Estimation of Locational Choices of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Hong Kong and U. S. Firms in China, University of California, Santa Cruz, manuscript.
69. GAO, Ting, 2002, Labor Quality and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from FDI in China by Investing Country, University of Missouri, manuscript.
70. Gentry, B.S., Jan., 1999, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Boon or Bane? Paper presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28-29, The Hague, Netherlands.
71. Gentry, B. S. et. al. 1996, Private capital flows and the environment: lessons from Latin America, mimeo, Yale Centre for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, Connecticut.
72. G. M. Grossman and A. B. Krueger, 1991, Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, NBER Working Paper,. NO. 3914.
73. Goldenman, G. Jan. , 1999,The Environmental Implications of Foreign Direct Investment: Policy and Institutional Issues, Paper presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28-29, The Hague, Netherlands.
74. Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger 1995, Economic Growth and the Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 110, 353-377.
75. G. Schulze, H. Ursprung, 2001, The Political Economy of International Trade and the Environment, in: G. Schulze, H. Ursprung, eds., International Environmental Economics: A Survey of the Issues[M], Oxford University Press, Oxford, 62-83.
76. Han, K. And J. B. Braden, 1996, Environment and Trade: New Evidence from U. S. Manufacturing. Mimeo.
77. Harbaugh, William, Arik Levinson, and David Wilson, May, 2000, Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve, NBER Working Paper NO. 7711.
78. Head, Keith and John Ries, 1996, Inter-City Competition for Foreign Investment: Static and Dynamic Effects of China' s Incentive Areas, Journal of Urban Economics [J], 40, 38-60.
79. Henley, John, Colin Kirkpatrick, and Georgina Wilde, 1999, Foreign Direct Investment in China: Recent Trends and Current Policy Issues, World Economy [J], 22, 223-243.
80. Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky, 1996, The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 30, 381-395.
81. Hettige, H. Huq, M. Pargal, S. and Wheeler, D, 1996, Determinants of Pollution Abatement in Developing Countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia, World Development [J], 24(12), 891-904.
82. Hilton, F. G. Hank, and Arik Levinson, 1998, Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Automotive Lead Emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 35, 126-141.
83. Jaffe, A. B. ET AL, 1993, Environmental Regulations and the Competitiveness of US Industry, Report prepared for Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington DC: US Dept. of Commerce.
84. Jaffe, A.B.ET AL, 1995, Environmental Regulations and International Competitiveness: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature [J], 33, 132-163.
85. J. Beghin, D. Roland-Hoist, and D. van der Mensbrugghe, 1997, Trade and pollution linkages: piecemeal policy reform and optimal intervention, Can. J. Econom. [J], 30, 442-455.
86. Jenkins, R, Jul., 1999, Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness-a Framework for Analysis, Paper presented at a Conference on Environmental Regulations, Globalisation of Production and Technological Change, University of East Anglia, 1-2.
87. Jeppessen, T. et al, 2002, Environmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis, Journal of Regional Science [J], 42(1), 19-49.
88. J. Merrifield, 1988, The Impact of Selected Abatement Strategies on Transnational Pollution, the Terms of Trade, and Factor Rewards: A General Equilibrium Approach, J. Environ. Econom. Management, 15, 259-284.
89. Johal, S. and A. Ulph, 2002, Global Environmental Governance, Political Lobbying and Transboundary Pollution, In List, A. J. and A. de Zeeuw (eds), Recent Advances in Environmental Economics [J], Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 36-43.
90. Jones, 1997a, Globalisation and Environment: Main Issues. In OECD.
91. Johnstone, N., 1997, Globalisation, Technology and Environment, Globalisation and Environment: Preliminary Perspectives, OECD, Paris.
92. Judith M. Dean, Foreign Direct Investment and Pollution Havens Evaluating the Evidence from China http://hotdocs. usitc. gov/docs/pubs/research_working_papers/EC200401B. pdf
93. Keller, Wolfgang and Arik Levinson, 2002, Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to the U. S. States, Review of Economics and Statistic [J], 84, 691-703.
94. Khan, R. S, 2002, Trade Liberalization and the Environment: Northern and Southern Perspectives, in Khan, R. S. (ed) Trade and Environment, Zed, London.
95. Krueger, A, 1997, Trade Policy and Economic Development: How We Learn, American Economic Review [J], 87(1), 1-22.
96. Leonard, H. J, Pollution and the Struggle for the World Product: Multinational Corporations, Environment and International Comparative Advantage [M], Cambridge University Press, 1988.
97. Levinson, Arik and M. Scott Taylor, 2001, Trade and the Environment: Unmasking the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, manuscript, Georgetown University.
98. Levy, D. L, 1995, The Environmental Practices and Performance of Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations [J], Vol.4, NO. 1.
99. List, J. A. and C. Y. Co, 2000, The Effects of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment, Journal of Economics and Environmental Management [J], 40(1), 1-20.
100. Low, P. (ed), 1992, International Trade and the Environment, Discussion Paper 159, Washington DC: World Bank.
101. Low, P. and A. Yeats, 1992, Do Dirty Industries Migrate? In P. LOW
102. Lucas, R., P. Wheeler and H. Hettige, 1992, Economic Development, Environmental Regulation and International Migration of Toxic Pollution 1960-1988, In Low.
103. Lucas, R. , 1990, Why doesn' t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? American Economic Review [J], 80, 92-96.
104. Li Yan Yong et. al, Study on the Two-stage Model of Corporate FDI Strategy, Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Strategic Management.
105. MAI (Negotiating Group on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment), Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: an Overview of the Literature http://wwwl. oecd. org/daf/mai/pdf/ng/ng9733rle. pdf
106. Mani, M. and D. Wheeler, 1997, In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960-1995, Working Paper Series, Research Project on Social and Environmental Consequences of Growth-Oriented Policies. Washington DC: Policy Research Department, World Bank.
107. Mani, M. et al, 1997, Is There an Environmental Race to the Bottom? Evidence on the Role of Environmental Regulation in Plant Location Decisions in India, Policy and Research Department, Washington D. C., World Bank.
108. Mani, M. S., 1996, Environmental Tariffs on Polluting Imports: An Empirical Study, Environmental and Resource Economics [J], 7, 391-411.
109. Markusen, J. R, 1999, Location Choice, Environmental Quality and Public Policy, in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (ed) Handbook of Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
110. May, P. H. ET AL, 1996, International Private Finance and Sustainable Development: Policy Infrastructure. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: CPDA-UFRRJ mimeo.
111. Matthew A. Colea #, Robert J. R. Elliotta, Per G. Fredriksson, Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations? February 5, 2004 http://ideas, repec. org/a/bla/scandj/vl08y2006i1p157-178. html
112. Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and William Behrens, 1972, The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.
113. Michael W. Hansen. Cross Border Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations-an Analytical Framework. Occasional Paper NO. 5, Report as part of UNCTAD /CBS Project: Cross Border Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations, June 1999 http: //www. ikl. cbs. dk./departments/ikl/cbem
114. Millimet, D. L. and J. A. List, 2004, The Case of the Missing Pollution Haven Hypothesis, Annual Meeting Allied Social Science Associations, San Diego, CA, January 3-5. http://faculty.smu.edu/millimet/pdf/hetero.pdf.
115. Motta, M. and J. -F. Thiss, 1994, Does Environmental Dumping Lead to Dislocation, European Economic Review[J], 38, 563-576.
116. Muradian, Roldan, Martin 0' Connor and Joan Martinez-Alier, 2001, Embodied Pollution in Trade: Estimating the "Environmental Load Displacement" of Industrialized Countries, FEEM Working Paper NO. 57, July, Milan.
117. Neumayer, E., 2000, Trade and the Environment: A critical assessment and some suggestions for reconciliation, Environment and Natural Resources.
118. Neumayer, Eric, 2002, Does Trade Openness Promote Multilateral Environmental Cooperation? The World Economy [J], 25(6), 812-832.
119. Newell, P. 2001, Managing Multinational: The Governance of Investment for the Environment, Journal of International Development [J], 13(7), 907-919.
120. Nick Mabey and Richard McNally, Foreign Direct Investment and the environmentFrom pollution havens to sustainable development. A WWF-UK Report, July 1998
121. OECD, 1996, Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Co-operation. Paris: OECD.
122. OECD, 1997a, Globalisation and Environment: Preliminary Perspectives. Paris: OECD.
123. Olewiler, N., 1994, The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Investment. In BENIDICKSON ET AL.
124. Palmer, K et al, 1995, Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefits-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, [J], 9(4), 119-132.
125. Parson, Edward, 2002, protecting the Ozone Layer: Science, Strategy, and Negotiation in the Shaping of a Global Environmental Regime [M], Oxford University Press, forthcoming, 2002.
126. P. Bardhan, 1997, Corruption and Development: a Review of the Issues, J. Econ. Lit. [J], 35, 1320-1346.
127. P. Chander, L. Wilde, 1992, Corruption in Tax Administration, J. Public Econ. [J], 49(3), 333-349.
128. Pearson, C. S, 1987, Multinational Corporations, Environment, and the Third World. Durham [M], NC: Duke University Press, 3-31.
129. P. G. Fredriksson, 1997, The Political Economy of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy, J. Environ. Econ. Manage [J],33,44-58.
130. P.G.Fredriksson, 2003, Political Instability, Corruption and Policy Formation, the Case of Environmental Policy, J. Public Econ. [J], 87, 1383-1405.
131. P. Hatzipanayotou and M.S. Michael, 1995, Foreign Aid and Public Goods, J. Dev. Econom. [J], 47, 455-467.
132. P. Hatzipanayotou, S. Lahiri and M.S.Michael, 2002, Can Cross-border Pollution Reduce Pollution? Can. J. Econom. [J].
133. Porter, Michael, and Claas van der Linde, 1995, Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives [J], 9, NO. 4, 97-118.
134. Porter, M. E, 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. London: Macmillan.
135. Porter, M. E. and C. Van der linde, 1995a, Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review [J], September-October, 120-134.
136. Raspiller, S. and N. Riedinger, 2004, Do Environmental Regulations Influence the Location Behavior of French Firms? Paper Presented at the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the EAERE, Budapest, Hungary.
137. R. Damania, 2002, Environmental Controls with Corrupt Bureaucrats, Environ. Devel.Econ. [J], 7, 407-427.
138. R. Deacon, 2002, Dictatorship, Democracy and the Provision of Public Goods, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California at Santa Barbara.
139. Repetto, R. , 1995, Jobs, Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation: What are the Real Issues? Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
140. R. Ludema and I. Wooton, 1994, Cross-border Externalities and Trade Liberalization: the Strategic Control of Pollution, Can. J. Econom. [J], 27, 950-966.
141. R. Ludema and I. Wooton, 1997, International Trade Rules and Environmental Cooperation under Asymmetric Information, Int. Econom. Rev. [J], 38, 605-625.
142. Saint Paul, G, 1994, Trade Patterns and Pollution, Working Paper NO. 40, 94, Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
143. Schmidheiny, S. and B. S. Gentry, 1997, Privately Financed Sustainable Development, In D. C. Esty and M. Chertow (EDS.). Next Generation Environmental Policy [M], New Haven: Yale Press.
144. Selden, Thomas, and Daqing Song, 1994, Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 27, 147-162.
145. Selden, Thomas, and Daqing Song, 1995, Neoclassical Growth, the J Curve for Abatement, and the Inverted U Curve for Pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management[J], 29, 162-168.
146. Shafik, Nemat, 1994, Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers [J], 46, 757-773.
147. Shafik, N. and S. Bandyopadhyay, 1992, Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross Section Evidence, 1992 World Development Report Background Paper. Washington, D. C. , World Bank
148. Shuguang, Z., Z. Yansheng, and W. Zhongxin, 1998, Measuring the Cost of Protection in China. Washington, D. C. : Institute for International Economics.
149. Smarzynska, Beata K. and Shang-Jin Wei, 2001. Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment: Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?" NBER Working Paper NO. 8465.
150. Sorsa, P, 1994, Competitiveness and Environmental Standards: Some Exploratory Results, Policy Research Working Paper 1249, Washington DC: World Bank.
151. Tobey, J. A., 1990, The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test, Kyklos [J], 43,191-209.
152. Tobey, J. A. , 1993, The Impact of Domestic Environmental Policies on International Trade, In OECD.
153. U. Desai, Ecological Policy and Politics in Developing Countries: Economic Growth, Democracy and Environment [M], State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1998.
154. Ulrich J. Wagner, Christopher D. Timmins, Agglomeration Effects in Foreign Direct Investment and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, January 29, 2007 http://www. Columbia. edu/^uw210l/Wagner_Timmins_FDI. pdf
155. UNCTAD (UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT), 1993, Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations. New York: UNCTAD.
156. UNCTAD (UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT), 1995, World Investment Report 1995: Investment, Trade, and International Policy Arrangements. Geneva: UNCTAD.
157.Valerica Vlad and Sajal Lahiri.Foreign Investment and Environment in a North-South Model with Cross-border Pollution https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1850.pdf
158.Van Der Linde,C.,1993,Micro-economic Aspects of Environmental Policies and Competitiveness.In OECD.
159.Wheeler,D.andA.Mody,1992,International Investment Location Decisions:The Case of US Firms.Journal of International Economics[J],33,57-76.
160.W.Ascher,1999,Why Governments Waste Natural Resources:Policy Failures in Developing Countries[M],Johns Hopkins University Press,Baltimore,1999.
161.Yuqing Xing,Charles D.Kolstad,Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? Revised:August 2000http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=ucsb econ
162.Zamparutti,A.and J.Klavens,1993,Environment and Foreign Investment in Central and Eastern Europe:Results from a Survey of Western Corporations.In OECD.
163.Zarsky,Lyuba,1997a,Stuck in the Mud? Nation States,Globalisation and Environment,In OECD.
164.Zarsky,L.,1999,Havens,Halos and Spaghetti:Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment,Emerging Market Economy Forum,OECD.
165.曹萍,优化FDI产业结构减少其对我国环境的负面影响[J],企业家天地,2007年第1期。
166.曹秋菊,外商直接投资与我国生态环境安全问题研究[J],财经理论与实践(双月刊),2007年5月第147期。
167.曹晓蕾,外商直接投资的负面效应研究及评述[J],世界经济与政治论坛,2007年第5期。
168.陈红蕾,陈秋锋,“污染避难所”假说及其在中国的检验[J],暨南学报,2006年第4期。
169.陈愈,吴建伟,对我国招商引资中污染产业转移问题应予关注[J],商业研究,2003年第1期。
170.郭印,利用外国直接投资项目中的环境保护问题[J],甘肃社会科学,2004年第1期。
171.焦必方,环保型经济增长—21世纪中国的必然选择[M],上海:复旦大学出版社,2000年。
172.梁蓓,国际直接投资对自然环境的影响及我国的政策取向[J],对外经济贸易大学学报,2003年第5期。
173.梁从诫,2005年:中国的环境危局与突围[M],社会科学文献出版社,2006年。
174.李岚红,外商直接投资于我国高污染行业的现象分析[J],兰州商学院学报,2006年第6期。
175.林麟,污染产业转移的影响因素分析[D],硕士学位论文,北京:对外经济与贸易大学,2006年3月。
176.刘娇,洪河,中国环境污染状况备忘录[J],生态经济,2003年第1期。
177.刘淑琪,我国引进外资过程中的污染转移问题研究[J],山东财政学院学报,2001年第1期。
178.李延勇,国际生产宏观经济理论的环境涵义及政策启示[J],理论学刊,2006第2期。
179.李延勇,国际生产折衷理论的环境涵义[J],经济管理·新管理,2006年第6期。
180.李延勇,国际生产微观经济理论的环境涵义及政策启示[J],城市发展研究,2006年第4期。
181.李延勇,贸易与环境:对外贸易可持续发展的核心问题[J],枣庄学院学报,2006年第4期。
182.李延勇,跨境环境管理:跨国公司环境效应研究的新方向[J],技术经济与管理研究,2006年第6期。
183.李延勇,国际生产环境效应的微观经济理论分析[J],青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006年第4期。
184.李延勇,跨国公司环境效应的理论分析[J],国际贸易,2007年第2期。
185.李延勇,环境措施、社会责任与企业竞争优势[J],山东社会科学,2007年第8期。
186.李延勇,跨国公司与环境管理体系的扩散[J],山东经济,2007年第5期。
187.李延勇,跨国公司环境效应文献述评[J],东岳论丛,2007年第4期。
188.李延勇,跨国公司的跨境环境管理战略分析[J],改革与战略,2006年第12期。
189.马传栋,可持续发展经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2002年。
190.马传栋,生态经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1986年。
191.马传栋,资源生态经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1995年。
192.马传栋,城市经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1989年。
193.马传栋,论生态工业[J]经济研究,1991年第3期。
194.潘家华,可持续发展发展途径的经济学分析[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997年。
195.潘申彪等,江浙沪三省市外商直接投资与环境污染的因果关系检验[J],国际贸易问题,2005年第12期。
196.任丽娟,我国利用FDI项目中的环境保护问题[J],商场现代化,2007年第4期。
197.孙静,唐建荣,FDI与我国制造业中的污染转移[J],商场现代化,2006年第35期。
198.田东文,焦旸,污染密集型产业对华转移的区位决定因素分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006第8期。
199.王俊豪,政府管制经济学导论[M],北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
200.王雪,国际产业转移理论及其研究[J],山东工商学院学报,2007年第2期。
201.卫迎春,中国外商直接投资的结构研究[D],博士论文,武汉:华中科技大学,2005年5月。
202.吴玉鸣,环境规制与外商直接投资因果关系的实证分析[J],华东师范大学学报,2006年第1期。
203.夏友富,外商转移污染密集产业的对策研究[J],管理世界,1999年第3期。
204.谢姚刚,理性看待污染密集产业转移[J],国际贸易问题,2004年第11期。
205.许水平,赵兴,污染密集产业转移原因的经济学分析及防范措施建议[J],经济论坛,2004年第21期。
206.杨海生等,外商直接投资与环境库兹涅茨曲线[J],绿色经济,2006年第1期。
207.杨海生,贾佳,周永章,王树功,贸易、外商直接投资、经济增长与环境污染[J],中国人口·资源与环境,2005年第3期。
208.杨英,基于FDI的污染密集产业转移与环境福利效应研究—以东部沿海地区为例[D],硕士学位论文,杭州:浙江大学,2005年11月。
209.应瑞瑶,周力,外商直接投资、工业污染与环境规制—基于中国数据的计量经济学分析[J],财贸经济,2006年第1期。
210.于良春,自然垄断与政府规制[M],经济科学出版社,2003年。
211.张德强,外国直接投资与环境保护的冲突与融合—兼论我国如何平衡FDI与环境保护的关系[J],国际贸易问题,2007年第9期
212.张德强,谭晶荣,关于外商直接投资对我国环境库兹涅茨曲线的影响及优化途径分析[J],国际贸易问题,2006年第3期。
213.张连众等,贸易自由化对中国环境污染的影响分析[J],南开经济研究,2003年第3期
214.张梅,外商投资与我国环境保护问题初探[J],生态经济,2006年第3期。
215.张燕文,外商直接投资中的环境负效应与消解[J],求索,2006年第7期。
216.郑宇植,中国环境污染与投资、贸易、GDP的关系[D],博士论文,北京:对外经济与贸易大学,2001年5月。
217.朱作鑫,外商投资企业环境污染问题若干思考[J],广西政法管理干部学院学报,2004年第5期。
218.左玉辉,环境经济学[M],高等教育出版社。
219.2001-2006年中国统计年鉴。