寄主胁迫下黄曲条跳甲取食量及体内酶活性的变异研究
|
摘要
近年来,在我国南方主要菜区,黄曲条跳甲防治出现了药效降低、药剂敏感性下降的现象,许多菜区黄曲条跳甲爆发成灾。在菜田生态系统中,黄曲条跳甲发生再猖獗的现象也比较严重。本文通过对常见的六种十字花科蔬菜寄主胁迫及寄主转换,黄曲条跳甲致害性和体内相关酶系的研究,揭示黄曲条跳甲再猖獗的深层次机理。
1.黄曲条跳甲在六种十字花科蔬菜的长期胁迫下,致害性的变化趋势和转化速率都有不同程度的变化。黄曲条跳甲在六种十字花科蔬菜上胁迫45d后取食量的大小为:芥菜>白菜>菜心>萝卜>芥兰>甘蓝。胁迫后取食量都有不同程度的减少,减少幅度最大的是芥菜,胁迫前取食量为96.33 mm2,胁迫45d后减少至80.67 mm2。说明在蔬菜生产中,由于同一蔬菜种植期内,各种寄主蔬菜的共同存在,黄曲条跳甲在各寄主蔬菜辗转为害,是造成黄曲条跳甲为害严重难以控制的原因之一。
2.在六种十字花科蔬菜的胁迫下,羧酸酯酶活性高低排列顺序为:芥菜>萝卜>白菜>甘蓝>菜心>芥兰;乙酰胆碱酯酶活性高低排列顺序为:萝卜>芥菜>甘蓝>白菜>芥兰>菜心;谷胱甘肽硫转移酶活性高低排列顺序为:芥菜>萝卜>白菜>甘蓝>菜心>芥兰。寄主胁迫下,黄曲条跳甲的取食量与其体内羧酸酯酶的规律基本一致,都是芥菜>白菜>萝卜>芥兰>甘蓝。说明黄曲条跳甲取食量对体内酶活性也有所影响,取食量较大的,其体内羧酸酯酶活性也相对较高。寄主胁迫下黄曲条跳甲体内相关酶变化幅度也不一致。羧酸酯酶,取食菜心的跳甲体内羧酸酯酶胁迫前和胁迫45d后活性分别为0.0158和0.0175,变化幅度最大,变化幅度较小的是甘蓝和芥兰。取食芥菜、萝卜、芥兰的乙酰胆碱酯向低活性方向发展,取食白菜的向高活性方向发展,芥兰在胁迫15d和30d的活性分别为0.0346和0.0390,变化幅度最大,幅度变化最小的是萝卜。
3.寄主转移以黄曲条跳甲的取食量及其体内的羧酸酯酶、乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶作为测定指标,研究黄曲条跳甲寄主转换后的变异规律。
本研究的结果表明,随着寄主的转换,黄曲条跳甲的取食量变异规律不一致。白菜与菜心寄主转换后,黄曲条跳甲的取食量变化不明显,从芥菜、菜心、白菜、萝卜转移到芥兰和甘蓝上,取食量的变化较为明显。
黄曲条跳甲随着寄主转换的不同其体内的羧酸酯酶、乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶的变异规律也不同,黄曲条跳甲体内的羧酸酯酶活性随着寄主的转换,变化的速率及幅度与乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶相比较大。这可能与植物营养物质及次生物质有关。乙酰胆碱酯酶在寄主转换后,也有不同程度的变化,这些都可能是菜田系统中黄曲条跳甲相关药剂敏感性变化的一个重要因素。
In recent years, phenomenons of potency and medicament sensitivity decreasing have been appeared in control of Phyllotreta striolata, and disasters have been come about by phyllotreta striolata in many vegetable fields in the main areas of Southern China. In the ecosystems of vegetable fields, rampant again phenomenons of Phyllotreta striolata occurred more seriously. Long term stress and host conversion of six cruciferous vegetables、virulence and enzymes in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata have been researched in this article.
1. Long-term stress of six cruciferous vegetables made trends of virulence changes and conversion rates of Phyllotreta striolata varying from each other.The order of feeding amount of phyllotreta striolata feeding on different cruciferous vegetables were as follows: Brassica juncea L.,B.chinensis L.,B.parachinensis Bailey,Raphanus sativus L.,B.alboglabra Bailey,B.oleracea. Long-term stress of six cruciferous vegetables made virulence capacity of Phyllotreta striolata change in varying degrees. R.sativus L.and B. parachinensis Bailey had a sharp increase, the change of B. juncea L.was not relatively obivious, B.oleracea and B.oleracea had decreasing trends.
2. In Long-term stress of six cruciferous vegetables, the order of carboxylesterase activity were as follows: B. juncea L.,R..sativus L.,B. chinensis L.,B.oleracea,B. parachinensis Bailey,B. alboglabra Bailey, the order of acetylcholinesterase activity were as follows: R .sativus L.,B. juncea L.,B. oleracea、B. chinensis L.,B. alboglabra Bailey,B. parachinensis Bailey,the order of glutathione S-transferase activity were as follows: B. juncea L.,R .sativus L.,B. chinensis L.,B.oleracea,B.parachinensis Bailey,B.alboglabra Bailey.Changes of enzymes in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata by host stress were inconsistent. The biggest changes of carboxylesterase of Phyllotreta striolata occurred in B. juncea L.and B. parachinensis Bailey,and the smallest changes of carboxylesterase of Phyllotreta striolata occurred in B.oleracea and B. alboglabra Bailey, Activity of carboxylesterase in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata had decentralization trends after 45 days.Acetylcholinesterase activity in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata feeding on different host plants were consistent after 45 days. Acetylcholinesterase activity of Phyllotreta striolata feeding on B. juncea L.,B. juncea L.,B. alboglabra Bailey decreased, the one feeding on B. chinensis L.increased, great changes occurred in B. alboglabra Bailey,smallest changes occurred in R.sativus L..
3. Host conversion based on such determination indicators: feeding amount、carboxylesterase activity、acetylcholinesterase activity、glutathione S-transferase activity, researched variation rules of Phyllotreta striolata after host conversion. The results showed that variation rule of feeding amount of Phyllotreta striolata was not consistent. Changes of feeding amount of Phyllotreta striolata were not obvious after host conversion on B. chinensis L.and B. parachinensis Bailey, changes of feeding amount of Phyllotreta striolata were more obvious after shifting them from B. juncea L.,B. parachinensis Bailey,B. chinensis L.,R.sativus L. to B. alboglabra Bailey and B.oleracea.
Variation rules of carboxylesterase,acetylcholinesterase,glutathione S-transferase in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata were different with different host conversion, changing rates of carboxylesterase activity in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata were more slowly than those of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase. This may be in relation to nutrients and secondary materials of plants. Acetylcholinesterase appeared actively after host conversion,this may be a important factor of medicament sensitivity decreasing and rampant again of Phyllotreta striolata in vegetable ecosystems.
1.黄曲条跳甲在六种十字花科蔬菜的长期胁迫下,致害性的变化趋势和转化速率都有不同程度的变化。黄曲条跳甲在六种十字花科蔬菜上胁迫45d后取食量的大小为:芥菜>白菜>菜心>萝卜>芥兰>甘蓝。胁迫后取食量都有不同程度的减少,减少幅度最大的是芥菜,胁迫前取食量为96.33 mm2,胁迫45d后减少至80.67 mm2。说明在蔬菜生产中,由于同一蔬菜种植期内,各种寄主蔬菜的共同存在,黄曲条跳甲在各寄主蔬菜辗转为害,是造成黄曲条跳甲为害严重难以控制的原因之一。
2.在六种十字花科蔬菜的胁迫下,羧酸酯酶活性高低排列顺序为:芥菜>萝卜>白菜>甘蓝>菜心>芥兰;乙酰胆碱酯酶活性高低排列顺序为:萝卜>芥菜>甘蓝>白菜>芥兰>菜心;谷胱甘肽硫转移酶活性高低排列顺序为:芥菜>萝卜>白菜>甘蓝>菜心>芥兰。寄主胁迫下,黄曲条跳甲的取食量与其体内羧酸酯酶的规律基本一致,都是芥菜>白菜>萝卜>芥兰>甘蓝。说明黄曲条跳甲取食量对体内酶活性也有所影响,取食量较大的,其体内羧酸酯酶活性也相对较高。寄主胁迫下黄曲条跳甲体内相关酶变化幅度也不一致。羧酸酯酶,取食菜心的跳甲体内羧酸酯酶胁迫前和胁迫45d后活性分别为0.0158和0.0175,变化幅度最大,变化幅度较小的是甘蓝和芥兰。取食芥菜、萝卜、芥兰的乙酰胆碱酯向低活性方向发展,取食白菜的向高活性方向发展,芥兰在胁迫15d和30d的活性分别为0.0346和0.0390,变化幅度最大,幅度变化最小的是萝卜。
3.寄主转移以黄曲条跳甲的取食量及其体内的羧酸酯酶、乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶作为测定指标,研究黄曲条跳甲寄主转换后的变异规律。
本研究的结果表明,随着寄主的转换,黄曲条跳甲的取食量变异规律不一致。白菜与菜心寄主转换后,黄曲条跳甲的取食量变化不明显,从芥菜、菜心、白菜、萝卜转移到芥兰和甘蓝上,取食量的变化较为明显。
黄曲条跳甲随着寄主转换的不同其体内的羧酸酯酶、乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶的变异规律也不同,黄曲条跳甲体内的羧酸酯酶活性随着寄主的转换,变化的速率及幅度与乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶相比较大。这可能与植物营养物质及次生物质有关。乙酰胆碱酯酶在寄主转换后,也有不同程度的变化,这些都可能是菜田系统中黄曲条跳甲相关药剂敏感性变化的一个重要因素。
In recent years, phenomenons of potency and medicament sensitivity decreasing have been appeared in control of Phyllotreta striolata, and disasters have been come about by phyllotreta striolata in many vegetable fields in the main areas of Southern China. In the ecosystems of vegetable fields, rampant again phenomenons of Phyllotreta striolata occurred more seriously. Long term stress and host conversion of six cruciferous vegetables、virulence and enzymes in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata have been researched in this article.
1. Long-term stress of six cruciferous vegetables made trends of virulence changes and conversion rates of Phyllotreta striolata varying from each other.The order of feeding amount of phyllotreta striolata feeding on different cruciferous vegetables were as follows: Brassica juncea L.,B.chinensis L.,B.parachinensis Bailey,Raphanus sativus L.,B.alboglabra Bailey,B.oleracea. Long-term stress of six cruciferous vegetables made virulence capacity of Phyllotreta striolata change in varying degrees. R.sativus L.and B. parachinensis Bailey had a sharp increase, the change of B. juncea L.was not relatively obivious, B.oleracea and B.oleracea had decreasing trends.
2. In Long-term stress of six cruciferous vegetables, the order of carboxylesterase activity were as follows: B. juncea L.,R..sativus L.,B. chinensis L.,B.oleracea,B. parachinensis Bailey,B. alboglabra Bailey, the order of acetylcholinesterase activity were as follows: R .sativus L.,B. juncea L.,B. oleracea、B. chinensis L.,B. alboglabra Bailey,B. parachinensis Bailey,the order of glutathione S-transferase activity were as follows: B. juncea L.,R .sativus L.,B. chinensis L.,B.oleracea,B.parachinensis Bailey,B.alboglabra Bailey.Changes of enzymes in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata by host stress were inconsistent. The biggest changes of carboxylesterase of Phyllotreta striolata occurred in B. juncea L.and B. parachinensis Bailey,and the smallest changes of carboxylesterase of Phyllotreta striolata occurred in B.oleracea and B. alboglabra Bailey, Activity of carboxylesterase in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata had decentralization trends after 45 days.Acetylcholinesterase activity in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata feeding on different host plants were consistent after 45 days. Acetylcholinesterase activity of Phyllotreta striolata feeding on B. juncea L.,B. juncea L.,B. alboglabra Bailey decreased, the one feeding on B. chinensis L.increased, great changes occurred in B. alboglabra Bailey,smallest changes occurred in R.sativus L..
3. Host conversion based on such determination indicators: feeding amount、carboxylesterase activity、acetylcholinesterase activity、glutathione S-transferase activity, researched variation rules of Phyllotreta striolata after host conversion. The results showed that variation rule of feeding amount of Phyllotreta striolata was not consistent. Changes of feeding amount of Phyllotreta striolata were not obvious after host conversion on B. chinensis L.and B. parachinensis Bailey, changes of feeding amount of Phyllotreta striolata were more obvious after shifting them from B. juncea L.,B. parachinensis Bailey,B. chinensis L.,R.sativus L. to B. alboglabra Bailey and B.oleracea.
Variation rules of carboxylesterase,acetylcholinesterase,glutathione S-transferase in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata were different with different host conversion, changing rates of carboxylesterase activity in vivo of Phyllotreta striolata were more slowly than those of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase. This may be in relation to nutrients and secondary materials of plants. Acetylcholinesterase appeared actively after host conversion,this may be a important factor of medicament sensitivity decreasing and rampant again of Phyllotreta striolata in vegetable ecosystems.
引文
[1] Feeny P, Paauwk K L, Demony N J. Flea beetles and mustard oils: Host plant specificity of Phyllotreta cruciferae and P.striotata adults(Coleoptera:chrysomelidae). Annual Entomological Society of America, 1970, 63(3): 841-847.
[2]高泽正,吴伟坚,崔志新.关于黄曲条跳甲的寄主范围.生态科学,2000,19(2):70-72.
[3] Allison B, Lauemt L. A late seventeenth century occurrence of Phyllotreta striolata(F).
[4]陈世骧,龚韵清.中国黄曲条跳甲记述.昆虫学报,1955,5(3):317-326.
[5] Amano K. Host preference of the yellow striped leaf beetle, Phyllotreta striolata Fab. (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) . Journal of Economic Entomology,1966,59:769-770.
[6] Tahvaanainen J. The relationship between leaf beetle and their cruciferous host plants:the role of plant and habitat characteristics. Oikos,1983,40(3):433-437.
[7]赵利敏,杜晓丽.甲拌磷对黄曲条跳甲的毒杀途径与毒力测定试验.青海农林科技,1989,(4):23-27.
[8]张茂新.黄曲条跳甲种群动态及控制的研究.华南农业大学博士学位论文,1998.
[9] Lamb R J. Phenology of flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) flight in relation to their invasion of canola fields in Manitoba. Canadian Entomologist.1983,115(11):1493-1502.
[10] Vincent C and R K Stewart.Crucifer-feeding flea beetle dispersal and statistics of directional data. Environmental Entomology,1983,12(5):1380-1383.
[10]曾玲.黄曲条跳甲种群动态及其防治的研究.华南农业大学博士学位论文,1989.
[12]顾启明.上海地区蔬菜害虫研究,黄曲条跳甲生物学特性、预测预报和防治的研究.上海农学院学报,1990,8(4):297-302.
[13]屈天祥.黄曲条跳甲及其防治.浙江农业科学,1961,(49):436-437.
[14]朱圣波.黄曲条跳甲的寄主选择性及其机理的研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2001.
[15]高泽正,吴伟坚,崔志新.关于黄曲条跳甲的寄主范围.生态科学,2000,19(2):70-72.
[16] Bodnaryk R P. Glucosinolate levels in cotyledons of mustard, Brassica juncea and rape,Bnapus do not determine feeding rates of flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1990,(16):2735-2746.
[17]刘芸.黄曲条跳甲寄主选择性研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[18]沈长朋,罗万春,慕卫,等.苦豆子提取物混剂对十字花科蔬菜害虫的田间控制作用.莱阳农学院学报,1998,15(3):195-200.
[19] Meisner J and B K Mitchel. Phagodeterrency effects of neem extracts and azadirachtin on flea beetles ,Phyllotreta striolata(F.).Journal of plant diseases and protection.1982, 89(8/9):463-467.
[20] Lamb R J. Susceptibility of low and high glucosinolate oilseed rapes to damage by flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 1988, 120(2) 195-196.
[21] Meisner J and B K Mitchell. Phagodeterrency induced by two cruciferous plants in adults of the flea beetle Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 1983,115:1209-1214.
[22] Meisner J and B K Mitchell. Pagodeterrency inducedby some scecondary plant substancesin adults of the flea beetle. Phyllotreta striolata. zeitschtrfy Fur pflan- zenkrankheiten and pflanzenschutz, 1984,91(3):301-304.
[23]侯有明,尤民生,庞雄飞,等.植物保护剂保卫德对黄曲条跳甲种群的控制作用.植物保护学报, 2002,29(3):244-248.
[24]侯有明,尤民生,庞雄飞,等.植物保护剂保卫德对黄曲条跳甲种群控制作用评价.福建农业学报, 2002,17(1):16-19.
[25]侯有明,尤民生,庞雄飞,等.印楝素乳油对黄曲条跳甲种群控制作用的模拟.福建农林大学学报:(自然科学版),2002, 31(1):37-40.
[26]高泽正.黄曲条跳甲的寄主选择性与应用研究.华南农业大学硕士学位论文,1999.
[27]赵辉,张茂新,凌冰,等.三种植物挥发物对黄曲条跳甲成虫行为的干扰作用.武夷科学. 2002,18:65-68.
[28]赖龙泉.植物提取物对黄曲条跳甲的控制作用研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[29]侯有明,庞雄飞,梁广文,等.土壤处理对黄曲条跳甲种群控制效应研究.华南农业大学学报,2000,21(3):21-24.
[30] Bodnayark R P. Leaf epicuticular wax, an anticuticular factor in Brassicaceae that affects the rate and pattern of feeding of flea beetles, Phyllotreta crucifefae (Goeze) . Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1992, 72:125-130.
[31]黎永健.杀虫双与溴氰菊酯混合液防治黄曲条跳甲实验.广西植保,2000,13(2):31-32.
[32]张纯胄,陈永兵.几种杀虫剂对黄曲条跳甲的毒效测定.上海蔬菜,2000,(4):28-29.
[33]吴伟坚.黄曲条跳甲食性的研究.生态学杂志,2002,21(1):32～34
[34]周先治.黄曲条跳甲抗药性的研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[35]顾秀慧,贝亚维,邬义扬.几种杀虫剂亚致死中量对褐稻虱生殖力影响初报.昆虫知识,1984,21(6):276-278.
[36]王荫长,范加勤,田学志,等.溴氰菊酯和甲胺磷引起稻飞虱再猖撅问题的研究.昆虫知识, 1994,31(5):257-262.
[37] Chelliah S, Heinrichs E A. Factors affecting insecticide induced resurgence of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, on rice varieties with different level of resistance. Environmental entomology ,1980,9(6):165-168.
[38] Ressing W H,Heinichs E A,Valencia S L.Insecticide induced resurgence of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens,on rice varieties with different level of resistance. Environmental entomology, 1982,11(1):165-168.
[39]高春先,顾秀慧.褐飞虱再猖獗的探讨.生态学报,1988,8(2):155-163.
[40] Wu J C, Xu J X, Lu J L, et al. Effects of herbicides on rice resistance and multiplication and feeding of brown planthopper(BPH), Nilaparvata lugens,(Homoptera :Delphacidae). International Journa of pest management, 2001,47(2):153-159.
[41] Wu J C, Xu J X, Yuan S Z, et al..Pesticide induced susceptibility of rice to brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001,100:119-126.
[42] Bernays E A, Chapman R F. Host- Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects[M]. New York, USA: Chapman and Hall , 1994.
[43] Veenstra K H, Pashley D P, Ottea J A. Host-plant adaptation in fall armywonn host strains:comparison of food consumption, utilization, and detoxication enzyme activities[J]. Ann Entolnol Soc Am, 1995, 88(1): 80 -91.
[44] Jongsma M A, Bakker P L, Peters J. Adaptation of Spodoptera exigua larvae to plant proteinase inhibitors by induction of gut proteinase activity insensitive to inhibition[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 1995, 92 : 8041- 8045.
[45]张茂新,凌波,梁广文.寄主植物对黄曲条跳甲的适合度及种群增长的影响.华南农业大学学报,2004,25(3):64～66.
[46] Saxena R C, Barrion A A. Biotypes of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvate lugens (Salt) and strategies in development of host plant resisitance. Insect Sci Applic,1985, 6(3):271~289.
[47]张志涛,陈伟,姜人春,等.稻褐飞虱致害性的转化.昆虫学报,1997,40(增刊):110～115.
[48] Pathak P K, Heinrichs E A. Selection of biotupe population 2 and 3 of Nilaparvata lugens by exposure to resistant rice varedties. Environ. Entomol.,1982, 11: 85~90. [49 ]Ketipearachchi Y, Kaneda C.Adaptation of the brows planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugents (Salt) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), to BPH resistant rice cultivars carrying bph9.Appl. Entonol. Zool.,1998,33(4):497~505.
[50]吕仲贤,俞晓平,陶林勇,等.褐飞虱虫源的致害性研究.西南农业大学学报,1998,20(5):446～449.
[51]刘芳,傅强,张志涛,等.稻褐飞虱田间种群不同世代致害性检测.江苏农业科学,2003,6:55～57.
[52]李青,罗善,师翱翔,等.我国褐飞虱生物型研究.西南农业学报,1994,7(3):89～96.
[53]姜人春.稻褐飞虱生物型的最新研究进展.昆虫知识,1999,36(5):308～312.
[54]谭玉娟,张扬,黄炳超.稻褐飞虱生物型变异动态检测及抗种品种资源推荐,昆虫学报, 1997,40(1):32～39.
[55]周亦红,韩召军.褐飞虱对抗性水稻Mudgo个体致害性指标.昆虫学报,2003(,46):305～310.
[56] Wood K A. Influence of the host plant of susceptibility of the fall armyworm to insecticides[J]. J Econ Entom., 1981, 74: 96.
[57] Ladal A A, Valn F, Sabelis M W. Induction of preference and performance after acclimation to novel hosts in a phytophagous spider mite : adaptive plasticity? . Am Natl , 2002,159 (5):553-565.
[58]谭维嘉,杨雪梅,郭予元.寄主植物对棉铃虫生理代谢的影响.植物保护学报,1993,20(2):147～153.
[59]董向丽,高希武,郑炳宗.植物次生物对棉铃虫谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶的影响.植物保护学报,1998,25(1):72-78.
[60]李腾武,宗静,高希武,等.寄主植物对桃蚜羧酸酯酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶的诱导作用.植物保护,1997,23(2):14-16.
[61]谭维嘉,赵焕香.取食不同寄主植物的棉铃虫对溴氰菊酯敏感性的变化.昆虫学报,1990,33(2):155～160.
[62]傅建炜,尤民生.寄主植物对黄曲条跳甲抗性相关酶系活性及其频率的影响.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2004,33(2):153-157.
[63]杨永义,王竹红,黄建,等.4种寄主植物对烟粉虱发育、存活及繁殖的影响.华东昆虫学报,2006,15(4):276-280.
[64]鲍晓莉. 6种寄主植物对斜纹夜蛾生长发育的影响.安徽农业科学,2006,34(15):3736.
[65]成卫宁,李修炼,仵均祥,等.不同寄主对美洲斑潜蝇生长发育的影响.西北林学院学报,2004,19(4):86-89.
[66]李巧丝,高宗仁,王文夕,等.不同寄主对棉铃虫生长发育及种群动态的影响.华北农学报,1999,14(1):102-106.
[67]陈永兵,张纯胄,胡丽秋.寄主植物对甜菜夜蛾生长发育的影响.昆虫知识,1999,36(6):332-334.
[68]吴伟坚.黄曲条跳甲食性的研究.生态学杂志,2002,21(1): 32-34.
[69] Byme F J, Devonshire A L. Insensitive acetylcholinesterase and esterase polymorphism in susceptible and resistance populations of the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) .Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 1993,45:34-42.
[70]高希武.害虫对杀虫剂抗性监测技术研究进展.农药,1998,28(4):1-5.
[71] Li F, Han Z L. Purification and characteritation acetylcholinesterase from cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) . Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2002,51:37-45.
[72] Habig W H, Pabst M J, Jakoby W B. Glutathion S-transferases: the first enrymatic step in mereapturic acid synthesis. Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 1974, 249 : 7130-7139.
[73]唐启义,冯明光. DPS数据处理系统及计算机操作平台.北京:农业出版社. 1997.
[74] Amano K. Host preference of the yellow striped leaf beetle, Phyllotreta striolata Fab. (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) . Journal of Economic Entomology,1966,59:769-770.
[75] Tahvaanainen J. The relationship between leaf beetle and their cruciferous host plants:the role of plant and habitat characteristics[J]. Oikos,1983,40(3):433-437.
[76]刘桂华,唐燕平.锈色粒肩天牛与寄主树种关系的初步研究.林业科学,2002,38(3):106-113.
[77]高希武.害虫对杀虫剂抗性监测技术研究进展.农药,1998,28(4):1-5.
[78]李子玲,韦绥概,韦飚,等.寄主植物对甜菜夜蛾的发育和繁殖及体内酯酶活性的影响.昆虫知识,2005,42(3):284-289.
[79]谢佳燕,何凤琴,李梅,等.寄主植物对棉蚜乙酰胆碱酯酶的影响.植物保护学报,2002,29(4):341-345.
[80] Terriere L C.Induction of detoxication enzymes in insects.Ann Rev Entomol, 1984, 29 : 71-88.
[2]高泽正,吴伟坚,崔志新.关于黄曲条跳甲的寄主范围.生态科学,2000,19(2):70-72.
[3] Allison B, Lauemt L. A late seventeenth century occurrence of Phyllotreta striolata(F).
[4]陈世骧,龚韵清.中国黄曲条跳甲记述.昆虫学报,1955,5(3):317-326.
[5] Amano K. Host preference of the yellow striped leaf beetle, Phyllotreta striolata Fab. (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) . Journal of Economic Entomology,1966,59:769-770.
[6] Tahvaanainen J. The relationship between leaf beetle and their cruciferous host plants:the role of plant and habitat characteristics. Oikos,1983,40(3):433-437.
[7]赵利敏,杜晓丽.甲拌磷对黄曲条跳甲的毒杀途径与毒力测定试验.青海农林科技,1989,(4):23-27.
[8]张茂新.黄曲条跳甲种群动态及控制的研究.华南农业大学博士学位论文,1998.
[9] Lamb R J. Phenology of flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) flight in relation to their invasion of canola fields in Manitoba. Canadian Entomologist.1983,115(11):1493-1502.
[10] Vincent C and R K Stewart.Crucifer-feeding flea beetle dispersal and statistics of directional data. Environmental Entomology,1983,12(5):1380-1383.
[10]曾玲.黄曲条跳甲种群动态及其防治的研究.华南农业大学博士学位论文,1989.
[12]顾启明.上海地区蔬菜害虫研究,黄曲条跳甲生物学特性、预测预报和防治的研究.上海农学院学报,1990,8(4):297-302.
[13]屈天祥.黄曲条跳甲及其防治.浙江农业科学,1961,(49):436-437.
[14]朱圣波.黄曲条跳甲的寄主选择性及其机理的研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2001.
[15]高泽正,吴伟坚,崔志新.关于黄曲条跳甲的寄主范围.生态科学,2000,19(2):70-72.
[16] Bodnaryk R P. Glucosinolate levels in cotyledons of mustard, Brassica juncea and rape,Bnapus do not determine feeding rates of flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1990,(16):2735-2746.
[17]刘芸.黄曲条跳甲寄主选择性研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[18]沈长朋,罗万春,慕卫,等.苦豆子提取物混剂对十字花科蔬菜害虫的田间控制作用.莱阳农学院学报,1998,15(3):195-200.
[19] Meisner J and B K Mitchel. Phagodeterrency effects of neem extracts and azadirachtin on flea beetles ,Phyllotreta striolata(F.).Journal of plant diseases and protection.1982, 89(8/9):463-467.
[20] Lamb R J. Susceptibility of low and high glucosinolate oilseed rapes to damage by flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 1988, 120(2) 195-196.
[21] Meisner J and B K Mitchell. Phagodeterrency induced by two cruciferous plants in adults of the flea beetle Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 1983,115:1209-1214.
[22] Meisner J and B K Mitchell. Pagodeterrency inducedby some scecondary plant substancesin adults of the flea beetle. Phyllotreta striolata. zeitschtrfy Fur pflan- zenkrankheiten and pflanzenschutz, 1984,91(3):301-304.
[23]侯有明,尤民生,庞雄飞,等.植物保护剂保卫德对黄曲条跳甲种群的控制作用.植物保护学报, 2002,29(3):244-248.
[24]侯有明,尤民生,庞雄飞,等.植物保护剂保卫德对黄曲条跳甲种群控制作用评价.福建农业学报, 2002,17(1):16-19.
[25]侯有明,尤民生,庞雄飞,等.印楝素乳油对黄曲条跳甲种群控制作用的模拟.福建农林大学学报:(自然科学版),2002, 31(1):37-40.
[26]高泽正.黄曲条跳甲的寄主选择性与应用研究.华南农业大学硕士学位论文,1999.
[27]赵辉,张茂新,凌冰,等.三种植物挥发物对黄曲条跳甲成虫行为的干扰作用.武夷科学. 2002,18:65-68.
[28]赖龙泉.植物提取物对黄曲条跳甲的控制作用研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[29]侯有明,庞雄飞,梁广文,等.土壤处理对黄曲条跳甲种群控制效应研究.华南农业大学学报,2000,21(3):21-24.
[30] Bodnayark R P. Leaf epicuticular wax, an anticuticular factor in Brassicaceae that affects the rate and pattern of feeding of flea beetles, Phyllotreta crucifefae (Goeze) . Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1992, 72:125-130.
[31]黎永健.杀虫双与溴氰菊酯混合液防治黄曲条跳甲实验.广西植保,2000,13(2):31-32.
[32]张纯胄,陈永兵.几种杀虫剂对黄曲条跳甲的毒效测定.上海蔬菜,2000,(4):28-29.
[33]吴伟坚.黄曲条跳甲食性的研究.生态学杂志,2002,21(1):32～34
[34]周先治.黄曲条跳甲抗药性的研究.福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[35]顾秀慧,贝亚维,邬义扬.几种杀虫剂亚致死中量对褐稻虱生殖力影响初报.昆虫知识,1984,21(6):276-278.
[36]王荫长,范加勤,田学志,等.溴氰菊酯和甲胺磷引起稻飞虱再猖撅问题的研究.昆虫知识, 1994,31(5):257-262.
[37] Chelliah S, Heinrichs E A. Factors affecting insecticide induced resurgence of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, on rice varieties with different level of resistance. Environmental entomology ,1980,9(6):165-168.
[38] Ressing W H,Heinichs E A,Valencia S L.Insecticide induced resurgence of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens,on rice varieties with different level of resistance. Environmental entomology, 1982,11(1):165-168.
[39]高春先,顾秀慧.褐飞虱再猖獗的探讨.生态学报,1988,8(2):155-163.
[40] Wu J C, Xu J X, Lu J L, et al. Effects of herbicides on rice resistance and multiplication and feeding of brown planthopper(BPH), Nilaparvata lugens,(Homoptera :Delphacidae). International Journa of pest management, 2001,47(2):153-159.
[41] Wu J C, Xu J X, Yuan S Z, et al..Pesticide induced susceptibility of rice to brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001,100:119-126.
[42] Bernays E A, Chapman R F. Host- Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects[M]. New York, USA: Chapman and Hall , 1994.
[43] Veenstra K H, Pashley D P, Ottea J A. Host-plant adaptation in fall armywonn host strains:comparison of food consumption, utilization, and detoxication enzyme activities[J]. Ann Entolnol Soc Am, 1995, 88(1): 80 -91.
[44] Jongsma M A, Bakker P L, Peters J. Adaptation of Spodoptera exigua larvae to plant proteinase inhibitors by induction of gut proteinase activity insensitive to inhibition[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 1995, 92 : 8041- 8045.
[45]张茂新,凌波,梁广文.寄主植物对黄曲条跳甲的适合度及种群增长的影响.华南农业大学学报,2004,25(3):64～66.
[46] Saxena R C, Barrion A A. Biotypes of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvate lugens (Salt) and strategies in development of host plant resisitance. Insect Sci Applic,1985, 6(3):271~289.
[47]张志涛,陈伟,姜人春,等.稻褐飞虱致害性的转化.昆虫学报,1997,40(增刊):110～115.
[48] Pathak P K, Heinrichs E A. Selection of biotupe population 2 and 3 of Nilaparvata lugens by exposure to resistant rice varedties. Environ. Entomol.,1982, 11: 85~90. [49 ]Ketipearachchi Y, Kaneda C.Adaptation of the brows planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugents (Salt) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), to BPH resistant rice cultivars carrying bph9.Appl. Entonol. Zool.,1998,33(4):497~505.
[50]吕仲贤,俞晓平,陶林勇,等.褐飞虱虫源的致害性研究.西南农业大学学报,1998,20(5):446～449.
[51]刘芳,傅强,张志涛,等.稻褐飞虱田间种群不同世代致害性检测.江苏农业科学,2003,6:55～57.
[52]李青,罗善,师翱翔,等.我国褐飞虱生物型研究.西南农业学报,1994,7(3):89～96.
[53]姜人春.稻褐飞虱生物型的最新研究进展.昆虫知识,1999,36(5):308～312.
[54]谭玉娟,张扬,黄炳超.稻褐飞虱生物型变异动态检测及抗种品种资源推荐,昆虫学报, 1997,40(1):32～39.
[55]周亦红,韩召军.褐飞虱对抗性水稻Mudgo个体致害性指标.昆虫学报,2003(,46):305～310.
[56] Wood K A. Influence of the host plant of susceptibility of the fall armyworm to insecticides[J]. J Econ Entom., 1981, 74: 96.
[57] Ladal A A, Valn F, Sabelis M W. Induction of preference and performance after acclimation to novel hosts in a phytophagous spider mite : adaptive plasticity? . Am Natl , 2002,159 (5):553-565.
[58]谭维嘉,杨雪梅,郭予元.寄主植物对棉铃虫生理代谢的影响.植物保护学报,1993,20(2):147～153.
[59]董向丽,高希武,郑炳宗.植物次生物对棉铃虫谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶的影响.植物保护学报,1998,25(1):72-78.
[60]李腾武,宗静,高希武,等.寄主植物对桃蚜羧酸酯酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶的诱导作用.植物保护,1997,23(2):14-16.
[61]谭维嘉,赵焕香.取食不同寄主植物的棉铃虫对溴氰菊酯敏感性的变化.昆虫学报,1990,33(2):155～160.
[62]傅建炜,尤民生.寄主植物对黄曲条跳甲抗性相关酶系活性及其频率的影响.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2004,33(2):153-157.
[63]杨永义,王竹红,黄建,等.4种寄主植物对烟粉虱发育、存活及繁殖的影响.华东昆虫学报,2006,15(4):276-280.
[64]鲍晓莉. 6种寄主植物对斜纹夜蛾生长发育的影响.安徽农业科学,2006,34(15):3736.
[65]成卫宁,李修炼,仵均祥,等.不同寄主对美洲斑潜蝇生长发育的影响.西北林学院学报,2004,19(4):86-89.
[66]李巧丝,高宗仁,王文夕,等.不同寄主对棉铃虫生长发育及种群动态的影响.华北农学报,1999,14(1):102-106.
[67]陈永兵,张纯胄,胡丽秋.寄主植物对甜菜夜蛾生长发育的影响.昆虫知识,1999,36(6):332-334.
[68]吴伟坚.黄曲条跳甲食性的研究.生态学杂志,2002,21(1): 32-34.
[69] Byme F J, Devonshire A L. Insensitive acetylcholinesterase and esterase polymorphism in susceptible and resistance populations of the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) .Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 1993,45:34-42.
[70]高希武.害虫对杀虫剂抗性监测技术研究进展.农药,1998,28(4):1-5.
[71] Li F, Han Z L. Purification and characteritation acetylcholinesterase from cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) . Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2002,51:37-45.
[72] Habig W H, Pabst M J, Jakoby W B. Glutathion S-transferases: the first enrymatic step in mereapturic acid synthesis. Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 1974, 249 : 7130-7139.
[73]唐启义,冯明光. DPS数据处理系统及计算机操作平台.北京:农业出版社. 1997.
[74] Amano K. Host preference of the yellow striped leaf beetle, Phyllotreta striolata Fab. (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) . Journal of Economic Entomology,1966,59:769-770.
[75] Tahvaanainen J. The relationship between leaf beetle and their cruciferous host plants:the role of plant and habitat characteristics[J]. Oikos,1983,40(3):433-437.
[76]刘桂华,唐燕平.锈色粒肩天牛与寄主树种关系的初步研究.林业科学,2002,38(3):106-113.
[77]高希武.害虫对杀虫剂抗性监测技术研究进展.农药,1998,28(4):1-5.
[78]李子玲,韦绥概,韦飚,等.寄主植物对甜菜夜蛾的发育和繁殖及体内酯酶活性的影响.昆虫知识,2005,42(3):284-289.
[79]谢佳燕,何凤琴,李梅,等.寄主植物对棉蚜乙酰胆碱酯酶的影响.植物保护学报,2002,29(4):341-345.
[80] Terriere L C.Induction of detoxication enzymes in insects.Ann Rev Entomol, 1984, 29 : 71-88.