环太湖生态农业旅游圈综合评价与可持续发展研究
|
摘要
生态农业旅游在国内从产生到兴起只有十余年左右的历史。无论是针对该行业的基础研究还是实践研究都还处在初始阶段,存在诸多不协调、不统一、不确定的问题。比如,生态农业旅游概念使用混乱,不利于学术规范和交流的问题；生态农业旅游资源分类缺少标准,不利于资源统计影响规划建设的问题；生态农业旅游地现状评价没有统一指标体系,不利于进行不同区域现状研究与比较的问题；生态农业旅游产业可持续发展评价缺少适用的数学模型,不利于产业评估与后续协调发展的问题等。文献研究表明,仅生态农业旅游相关的概念,国内学术界就有观光农业、农业旅游、乡村旅游、农业生态旅游、农家乐、都市农业旅游、三农旅游、农村旅游等十余种之多。再如,生态农业旅游地的综合评价是研究的热点问题之一,但目前国内还没有统一的评价指标体系。可持续发展是全球共同关注的研究课题,但生态农业旅游的可持续发展研究目前国内还没有大规模兴起。
在研究的过程中发现,不少地区发展生态农业旅游,不仅没有起到保护环境、促进发展和人地和谐的目标,而且出现了盲目跟风、重复建设甚至生态遭到破坏的情况。环太湖四市由于地理位置处在全国经济最为发达的长江三角洲的腹地,历来也是国内外闻名的旅游目的地,这个区域的生态农业旅游发展状况、模式、经验等在全国范围内都有着典型意义,其示范作用、引导作用不容忽视。所以,本研究以环太湖的苏州、无锡、常州、湖州四市为研究区域,以其生态农业旅游产业为研究对象,明确生态农业旅游资源概念与分类,构建生态农业旅游地综合评价体系,调查统计研究区域生态农业旅游资源状况,使用综合数据分析法进行综合评价,使用生态足迹分析方法建立新的数学模型对生态农业旅游可持续发展进行评价,为环太湖生态农业旅游提供决策依据。
值得关注的是,当前生态农业旅游项目多以现代农业和生态农业为主,景区建设地主要在农村区域,从业人员主要为当地农民,生态农业旅游业的发展对于解决“三农问题”将产生重要影响。对于环太湖地区而言,生态农业旅游还负有保护太湖这个核心资源,共同治理太湖,提升农业生态服务功能,探索农业结构调整策略等重大任务。研究环太湖的生态农业旅游不仅对本地区具有现实意义,也将在全国范围内产生重要影响。
经过研究,初步提出了以下建议,得到了以下结论：
(1)建议在学术研究中统一使用“生态农业旅游”的概念。经过综合对比研究发现,各种不同的概念存在内在的统一性,农村是主要研究区域,农业是主体研究内容,农民是从业人员的主体。因此,这样做不仅符合概念产生的根源,也符合发展趋势、学术交流、生态运动潮流和学术研究习惯。
(2)提出了建设“环太湖生态农业旅游圈”的构想。从自然条件、社会经济条件、政策条件、产业条件、资源条件、劳动力条件等,阐述了建立该区域经济一体化组织的可行性、必要性及其可能产生的重大意义。研究还指出,选择生态农业旅游产业既可以将这个新兴产业当作联合发展的“试金石”,可以为今后进行大模型区域内产业转型的积累经验,真正实现协同发展,避免重复建设,减少资源浪费,也可以为全国范围内开展的生态农业旅游产业发展提供可参考的样板。
(3)研究提出了生态农业旅游资源概念与分类的参考建议。鉴于生态农业旅游资源分类缺少统一标准的情况,为了进行后续区域资源调查,在进行生态农业旅游资源分类时,应当本着“地域相关、产业相关、主体相关”的原则,即资源地在农村区域,功能以农业为主,以农民为参与主体、管理主体与受益主体的原则。研究提出生态农业旅游资源分类的建议,分为农村生态环境、传统特色建筑与设计、现代农业特色与示范点、传统农业生产活动、特色产品与工艺以及人文与民俗活动六大类。该分类建议也为之后的资源调查提供了明确要求,对摸清环太湖生态农业旅游圈整体资源状况打下了基础。研究使用问卷调查、走访、实地考察等方法,发放问卷300余份,走访考察点20余处,基本摸清了研究区域内的资源数量及分布状况。资源调查的结果表明,研究区域内六类资源的总量达到1100多个,其中现代农业特色与示范点达到600个以上。调查表明,从业人员数量多,生产能力较大,项目多样化,具有发展的活力。结果说明该区域生态农业旅游资源具有种类齐全,数量丰富,农民参与热情高,政策支持力度大等特点与优势。同时,调查也指出了存在的四个大问题,即同质性强、重复建设、市场混乱以及污染严重等问题。
(4)构建了针对生态农业旅游地的综合评价指标体系。在提出综合评价指标之前,为了能够体现能通用性、适用性,增强研究结果的可比性,研究提出了“三农、三生、三大、三利”的原则,即“农业、农村、农民的结合”、“生产、生活、生态的结合”、“大农业、大生态、大旅游的结合”、“社会效益、经济效益、环境效益的结合”等。考虑实际的参考意义,研究选定环太湖生态农业旅游圈为主体,提出并制订了操作性强的指标体系,分为3层,27个量化指标。文献研究表明,层次分析法进行现状研究的主要方法。为了更好地体现评价的客观性与科学性,减少主观性与随意性,研究配合专家意见法,选取了共性明显的量化指标,构建了评价体系,经过对计算结果的分析,得到有说明力的影响因素排名,以便今后针对性提出发展策略。分析结论认为,环太湖生态农业旅游圈是一个成功的有影响力的生态农业旅游地。同时,研究找出了区内外客源条件、生态农业旅游资源、特色乡村聚落、环境保护措施与条件等因素对其产业发展起到重大的影响作用。
(5)得出了研究区域内生态农业旅游总的生态足迹。使用生态足迹分析法为研究工具,以翔实的数据计算结果来回答这一新经济体可持续发展的状况问题。生态足迹分析法在生态农业旅游产业中可持续发展研究中还是一个新思路。研究提出旅游生态足迹模型使用存在的诸多问题,提出了在生态农业旅游研究中新的生态足迹计算模型,包括交通、住宿、餐饮、购物、娱乐、游览、废弃物等七个方面,累加得到总的生态足迹,并依据此计算得出生态农业旅游者人均生态足迹。计算结果表明,环太湖生态农业旅游圈的人均旅游生态承载力数据为0.14ha,而生态农业旅游者人均的生态足迹为0.03ha,生态盈余为0.11ha。说明该区的生态农业旅游行业的发展处于可持续发展状态。
(6)研究结论认为,建立环太湖生态农业旅游条件成熟,时机适宜,意义重大,可行性强,是一个成功的有影响力的生态农业旅游地,生态农业旅游产业的发展处于可持续发展状态。本研究对于丰富国内生态农业旅游基础理论、现状分析体系以及可持续发展评价方法与模型等方面的研究做出了贡献。
The ecological agriculture tourism (EAT) in domestic presents swift and violent development tendency. The author takes Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Huzhou which located around Taihu Lake as the research region and ecological agriculture traveling as research object. Based on the explaining of EAT resources concepts and their classifications, this thesis designs synthetic evaluation system and investigates its resources to analize its development condition. The author also uses ecological footprint analysis method to establishe a new mathematical models to evaluate its sustainable development. Finally, some strategies are put forward for EAT sustainable development. The main coclusions are as follows:
The research of EAT in the domestic has about ten years history. The investigation indicated that the development of EAT in many areas not only failed to protect the environment, promote development and harmony of people, but also there was a blind imitation, duplication or even the ecological had been destroyed. However, most of EAT projects were related to modern agriculture and ecological agriculture, and EAT scenic areas were mainly constructed in the countryside region. Meanwhile, the employees for EAT majorly come from the local farmer. Thus, suitable EAT projects will play a great role in agricultural development, farmer life improvement and rural development in China. So far as around the Taihu Lake area, EAT had more duty which to protect the key resources of Taihu Lake, control Taihu Lake, enhance agricultural services for natural ecosystems, promote agriculture structure adjustment and so on. Therefore, research on EAT around Taihu Lake not only has practical significance for the local development, but also will have important and typical references to the nationwide development.
Since the limit of theoretical research on EAT in China, there were several major problems which could affect the development of EAT. Firstly, the concept of EAT was not clear, which may influence the academic standard and exchange for EAT research. Secondly, there was no unified standard for the classification of EAT resources, which may impact the resources survey and planning. Thirdly, there was no unified index system for the situation appraisal of EAT destinations, which in turn will affect the EAT comparison between different regions. Finally, there was lack of suitable mathematical models for evaluation of EAT sustainable development, which may consequently influence the following coordinated development. According to the literature review, there were more than ten kinds of concepts related to EAT in the domestic academic circles, such as agritourism, sightseeing agriculture tourism, farms tourism, rural tourism, urban agriculture tourism, agro-eco-tourism, ecological agriculture tourism, agricultural ecological tourism, agritainment and so on. Literatures review showed that there existed intrinsic unity among these concepts, such as the main research area of countryside, the main study content of agriculture and the main employees of farmers. Therefore, this research proposed that ecological agriculture tourism could be used as the unified concept, because it conformed to the origin of concepts, the trend of development requirement, the need of academic exchanges, the trend of ecology movement tidal and the scholarly custom of EAT research.
Since these four cities around Taihu lake are located in Yangtze River delta center and well-known traveling destination whatever domestic and foreign, EAT developing conditions, patterns, experiences and etc had typical significance for the local development references in the nationwide scale. Therefore, the author put forward tentative plan that an idea to construct Eco-agricultural Tourism Agglomeration around Taihu Lake (EATATL). Taking account for the natural, the social economy, the policy, the industrial, the resources, and the labor force condition and so on, the author elaborated the great significance of EATATL establishment. It is a new region economic integration organization. This idea has the feasibility, necessity and probability. The researcher also pointed out that to take emerging EAT as the touchstone can accumulate experience of industrial reforming, realize the coordination development truly, avoid the building redundant project, and reduce the resources waste. At the same time, it can act as the model for the other area development.
To date, there is lack of classification standard of EAT resources, the refence standards for the concept of EAT resources and classification were put forward in this paper. According to these standards, the region, industrial and beneficiary should be the first. This means that EAT resources have primary agriculture function in countryside region, and the
farmers are the beneficiary of EAT. The resources were divided into six kinds, including countryside ecological environment, traditional features construction and design, modern agriculture characteristic demonstration point, traditional agricultural production activity, characteristic native product and craft as well as humanities and folk custom use. This classification standard can meet with the need of resources investigation and statistics work for EATATL in future. In order to study the distribution situation and quantity of EAT resources in this area, the researcher used questionnaire, visiting and survey methods, including 300 questionnaires and visited 20 scenic spots. The result showed that the total numbers of resources were more than 1100, in which modern agriculture characteristic and demonstration points were above 600. When aiming at human resources, production situation and traveling project, the situations are in great abundance, fruitful and multifarious. The investigation result indicated that EATATL had many characteristics and superiority to develop EAT. For instance, it owns many and various resources, and most of the farmers have participation will, as well as government policy support and so on. At the same time, there are four major problems can block its progress, namely strong homogeneity, redundant project, disorderly competition and serious pollution.
How to estimate the present situation of EAT destination quantificationally is the hot topic in domestic because there is no unified appraisal index system. The method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one suitable research method. In order to manifest versatility, serviceability and commensurability of appraisal index system, the four principles were proposed and were used to create index system. They were principle which union the issues of agriculture, peasant and rural area, principle which union life, product and ecology, principle which union great agriculture, great ecology and great tourism, principle which union social benefit, economic efficiency and environment benefit. The appraisal index system which was used to evaluate situation of EATATL was made up of three levels and twenty seven indicators. In order to manifest objectivity and scientific, reduce subjective and capriciousness, the researcher used the Delphi method to construct analysis system, so as to analysis process results, obtain the score order of influence factors and propose the developmental strategy finally. The result finally was about 8.6. In conclusion, EATATL is successful and influential ecological agriculture traveling destination. At the same time, the research has discovered that the condition of tourists source, EAT resources, characteristic village settlement, environmental protection, social influence and propaganda are main significant influence factors for its industry development.
How to keep sustainable development with current resources and others conditions is the main topic in the next part. EFA (Ecological Footprint Analyses) method becomes into the main and popular tool which is used to compute and evaluate the status of region sustainable development research. The author proposed new ecological footprint analyses model to calculate its footprint, which made up of transportation, lodging, dining, shopping, entertainment, tour and waste. Lastly, the per capita TEC was about 0.14 ha, while the value of per capita TEF was 0.03 ha. That is to say, there is ecological remainder and the value is 0.11 ha. It means that EAT in this area is in sustainable development status.
Summary, the establishment of EATATL has ripe conditions and suitable opportunity. And now, it is a successful and influential ecological agriculture traveling destination and eco-agriculture tourism in this area is in sustainable development status. This research enriches basic theory of domestic ecological agriculture tourism, present situation analysis system as well as the sustainable development assessment method and models.
在研究的过程中发现,不少地区发展生态农业旅游,不仅没有起到保护环境、促进发展和人地和谐的目标,而且出现了盲目跟风、重复建设甚至生态遭到破坏的情况。环太湖四市由于地理位置处在全国经济最为发达的长江三角洲的腹地,历来也是国内外闻名的旅游目的地,这个区域的生态农业旅游发展状况、模式、经验等在全国范围内都有着典型意义,其示范作用、引导作用不容忽视。所以,本研究以环太湖的苏州、无锡、常州、湖州四市为研究区域,以其生态农业旅游产业为研究对象,明确生态农业旅游资源概念与分类,构建生态农业旅游地综合评价体系,调查统计研究区域生态农业旅游资源状况,使用综合数据分析法进行综合评价,使用生态足迹分析方法建立新的数学模型对生态农业旅游可持续发展进行评价,为环太湖生态农业旅游提供决策依据。
值得关注的是,当前生态农业旅游项目多以现代农业和生态农业为主,景区建设地主要在农村区域,从业人员主要为当地农民,生态农业旅游业的发展对于解决“三农问题”将产生重要影响。对于环太湖地区而言,生态农业旅游还负有保护太湖这个核心资源,共同治理太湖,提升农业生态服务功能,探索农业结构调整策略等重大任务。研究环太湖的生态农业旅游不仅对本地区具有现实意义,也将在全国范围内产生重要影响。
经过研究,初步提出了以下建议,得到了以下结论：
(1)建议在学术研究中统一使用“生态农业旅游”的概念。经过综合对比研究发现,各种不同的概念存在内在的统一性,农村是主要研究区域,农业是主体研究内容,农民是从业人员的主体。因此,这样做不仅符合概念产生的根源,也符合发展趋势、学术交流、生态运动潮流和学术研究习惯。
(2)提出了建设“环太湖生态农业旅游圈”的构想。从自然条件、社会经济条件、政策条件、产业条件、资源条件、劳动力条件等,阐述了建立该区域经济一体化组织的可行性、必要性及其可能产生的重大意义。研究还指出,选择生态农业旅游产业既可以将这个新兴产业当作联合发展的“试金石”,可以为今后进行大模型区域内产业转型的积累经验,真正实现协同发展,避免重复建设,减少资源浪费,也可以为全国范围内开展的生态农业旅游产业发展提供可参考的样板。
(3)研究提出了生态农业旅游资源概念与分类的参考建议。鉴于生态农业旅游资源分类缺少统一标准的情况,为了进行后续区域资源调查,在进行生态农业旅游资源分类时,应当本着“地域相关、产业相关、主体相关”的原则,即资源地在农村区域,功能以农业为主,以农民为参与主体、管理主体与受益主体的原则。研究提出生态农业旅游资源分类的建议,分为农村生态环境、传统特色建筑与设计、现代农业特色与示范点、传统农业生产活动、特色产品与工艺以及人文与民俗活动六大类。该分类建议也为之后的资源调查提供了明确要求,对摸清环太湖生态农业旅游圈整体资源状况打下了基础。研究使用问卷调查、走访、实地考察等方法,发放问卷300余份,走访考察点20余处,基本摸清了研究区域内的资源数量及分布状况。资源调查的结果表明,研究区域内六类资源的总量达到1100多个,其中现代农业特色与示范点达到600个以上。调查表明,从业人员数量多,生产能力较大,项目多样化,具有发展的活力。结果说明该区域生态农业旅游资源具有种类齐全,数量丰富,农民参与热情高,政策支持力度大等特点与优势。同时,调查也指出了存在的四个大问题,即同质性强、重复建设、市场混乱以及污染严重等问题。
(4)构建了针对生态农业旅游地的综合评价指标体系。在提出综合评价指标之前,为了能够体现能通用性、适用性,增强研究结果的可比性,研究提出了“三农、三生、三大、三利”的原则,即“农业、农村、农民的结合”、“生产、生活、生态的结合”、“大农业、大生态、大旅游的结合”、“社会效益、经济效益、环境效益的结合”等。考虑实际的参考意义,研究选定环太湖生态农业旅游圈为主体,提出并制订了操作性强的指标体系,分为3层,27个量化指标。文献研究表明,层次分析法进行现状研究的主要方法。为了更好地体现评价的客观性与科学性,减少主观性与随意性,研究配合专家意见法,选取了共性明显的量化指标,构建了评价体系,经过对计算结果的分析,得到有说明力的影响因素排名,以便今后针对性提出发展策略。分析结论认为,环太湖生态农业旅游圈是一个成功的有影响力的生态农业旅游地。同时,研究找出了区内外客源条件、生态农业旅游资源、特色乡村聚落、环境保护措施与条件等因素对其产业发展起到重大的影响作用。
(5)得出了研究区域内生态农业旅游总的生态足迹。使用生态足迹分析法为研究工具,以翔实的数据计算结果来回答这一新经济体可持续发展的状况问题。生态足迹分析法在生态农业旅游产业中可持续发展研究中还是一个新思路。研究提出旅游生态足迹模型使用存在的诸多问题,提出了在生态农业旅游研究中新的生态足迹计算模型,包括交通、住宿、餐饮、购物、娱乐、游览、废弃物等七个方面,累加得到总的生态足迹,并依据此计算得出生态农业旅游者人均生态足迹。计算结果表明,环太湖生态农业旅游圈的人均旅游生态承载力数据为0.14ha,而生态农业旅游者人均的生态足迹为0.03ha,生态盈余为0.11ha。说明该区的生态农业旅游行业的发展处于可持续发展状态。
(6)研究结论认为,建立环太湖生态农业旅游条件成熟,时机适宜,意义重大,可行性强,是一个成功的有影响力的生态农业旅游地,生态农业旅游产业的发展处于可持续发展状态。本研究对于丰富国内生态农业旅游基础理论、现状分析体系以及可持续发展评价方法与模型等方面的研究做出了贡献。
The ecological agriculture tourism (EAT) in domestic presents swift and violent development tendency. The author takes Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Huzhou which located around Taihu Lake as the research region and ecological agriculture traveling as research object. Based on the explaining of EAT resources concepts and their classifications, this thesis designs synthetic evaluation system and investigates its resources to analize its development condition. The author also uses ecological footprint analysis method to establishe a new mathematical models to evaluate its sustainable development. Finally, some strategies are put forward for EAT sustainable development. The main coclusions are as follows:
The research of EAT in the domestic has about ten years history. The investigation indicated that the development of EAT in many areas not only failed to protect the environment, promote development and harmony of people, but also there was a blind imitation, duplication or even the ecological had been destroyed. However, most of EAT projects were related to modern agriculture and ecological agriculture, and EAT scenic areas were mainly constructed in the countryside region. Meanwhile, the employees for EAT majorly come from the local farmer. Thus, suitable EAT projects will play a great role in agricultural development, farmer life improvement and rural development in China. So far as around the Taihu Lake area, EAT had more duty which to protect the key resources of Taihu Lake, control Taihu Lake, enhance agricultural services for natural ecosystems, promote agriculture structure adjustment and so on. Therefore, research on EAT around Taihu Lake not only has practical significance for the local development, but also will have important and typical references to the nationwide development.
Since the limit of theoretical research on EAT in China, there were several major problems which could affect the development of EAT. Firstly, the concept of EAT was not clear, which may influence the academic standard and exchange for EAT research. Secondly, there was no unified standard for the classification of EAT resources, which may impact the resources survey and planning. Thirdly, there was no unified index system for the situation appraisal of EAT destinations, which in turn will affect the EAT comparison between different regions. Finally, there was lack of suitable mathematical models for evaluation of EAT sustainable development, which may consequently influence the following coordinated development. According to the literature review, there were more than ten kinds of concepts related to EAT in the domestic academic circles, such as agritourism, sightseeing agriculture tourism, farms tourism, rural tourism, urban agriculture tourism, agro-eco-tourism, ecological agriculture tourism, agricultural ecological tourism, agritainment and so on. Literatures review showed that there existed intrinsic unity among these concepts, such as the main research area of countryside, the main study content of agriculture and the main employees of farmers. Therefore, this research proposed that ecological agriculture tourism could be used as the unified concept, because it conformed to the origin of concepts, the trend of development requirement, the need of academic exchanges, the trend of ecology movement tidal and the scholarly custom of EAT research.
Since these four cities around Taihu lake are located in Yangtze River delta center and well-known traveling destination whatever domestic and foreign, EAT developing conditions, patterns, experiences and etc had typical significance for the local development references in the nationwide scale. Therefore, the author put forward tentative plan that an idea to construct Eco-agricultural Tourism Agglomeration around Taihu Lake (EATATL). Taking account for the natural, the social economy, the policy, the industrial, the resources, and the labor force condition and so on, the author elaborated the great significance of EATATL establishment. It is a new region economic integration organization. This idea has the feasibility, necessity and probability. The researcher also pointed out that to take emerging EAT as the touchstone can accumulate experience of industrial reforming, realize the coordination development truly, avoid the building redundant project, and reduce the resources waste. At the same time, it can act as the model for the other area development.
To date, there is lack of classification standard of EAT resources, the refence standards for the concept of EAT resources and classification were put forward in this paper. According to these standards, the region, industrial and beneficiary should be the first. This means that EAT resources have primary agriculture function in countryside region, and the
farmers are the beneficiary of EAT. The resources were divided into six kinds, including countryside ecological environment, traditional features construction and design, modern agriculture characteristic demonstration point, traditional agricultural production activity, characteristic native product and craft as well as humanities and folk custom use. This classification standard can meet with the need of resources investigation and statistics work for EATATL in future. In order to study the distribution situation and quantity of EAT resources in this area, the researcher used questionnaire, visiting and survey methods, including 300 questionnaires and visited 20 scenic spots. The result showed that the total numbers of resources were more than 1100, in which modern agriculture characteristic and demonstration points were above 600. When aiming at human resources, production situation and traveling project, the situations are in great abundance, fruitful and multifarious. The investigation result indicated that EATATL had many characteristics and superiority to develop EAT. For instance, it owns many and various resources, and most of the farmers have participation will, as well as government policy support and so on. At the same time, there are four major problems can block its progress, namely strong homogeneity, redundant project, disorderly competition and serious pollution.
How to estimate the present situation of EAT destination quantificationally is the hot topic in domestic because there is no unified appraisal index system. The method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one suitable research method. In order to manifest versatility, serviceability and commensurability of appraisal index system, the four principles were proposed and were used to create index system. They were principle which union the issues of agriculture, peasant and rural area, principle which union life, product and ecology, principle which union great agriculture, great ecology and great tourism, principle which union social benefit, economic efficiency and environment benefit. The appraisal index system which was used to evaluate situation of EATATL was made up of three levels and twenty seven indicators. In order to manifest objectivity and scientific, reduce subjective and capriciousness, the researcher used the Delphi method to construct analysis system, so as to analysis process results, obtain the score order of influence factors and propose the developmental strategy finally. The result finally was about 8.6. In conclusion, EATATL is successful and influential ecological agriculture traveling destination. At the same time, the research has discovered that the condition of tourists source, EAT resources, characteristic village settlement, environmental protection, social influence and propaganda are main significant influence factors for its industry development.
How to keep sustainable development with current resources and others conditions is the main topic in the next part. EFA (Ecological Footprint Analyses) method becomes into the main and popular tool which is used to compute and evaluate the status of region sustainable development research. The author proposed new ecological footprint analyses model to calculate its footprint, which made up of transportation, lodging, dining, shopping, entertainment, tour and waste. Lastly, the per capita TEC was about 0.14 ha, while the value of per capita TEF was 0.03 ha. That is to say, there is ecological remainder and the value is 0.11 ha. It means that EAT in this area is in sustainable development status.
Summary, the establishment of EATATL has ripe conditions and suitable opportunity. And now, it is a successful and influential ecological agriculture traveling destination and eco-agriculture tourism in this area is in sustainable development status. This research enriches basic theory of domestic ecological agriculture tourism, present situation analysis system as well as the sustainable development assessment method and models.
引文
[1]谢雨萍.我国生态农业旅游的研究进展[J].邵阳学院学报(自然科学版),2007,4(2)：105-109.
[2]王琼英,冯学钢.乡村旅游研究综述[J］.北京国语学院学报,2006,1：115-120.
[3]He J M, Li H,Wang Q. Rural Tourism in China:A Case Study of Nongjiale in the Chengdu Metropolitan Area. Mountain Research and Development,2004,24(3):260-262.
[4]刘德谦.关于乡村旅游、农业旅游与民俗旅游的几点辨析[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(3)：12-19.
[5]魏敏,冯永军,李芬,等.农业生态旅游可持续发展评价指标体系研究[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(1)：27-30.
[6]王继庆.我国乡村旅游可持续发展问题研究[D].沈阳：东北林业大学,2007.
[7]Jiang Y Y,Wang Y L, Peng J. Measuring tourism area sustainability based on tourism ecological footprint:a case study in Lijiang Naxi Autonomous County. Geographical Research,2006,25 (06): 1134-1142.
[8]Xiong D G, Xian X F, Jiang Y D. Discussion on ecological footprint theory applied to regional sustainable development evaluation. Progress in Geography,2003,22 (6):618-626.
[9]李燕琴.基于概念、原则与产品的生态旅游内涵研究[J].科技导报,2004,11：35-39.
[10]陶卓民,储震.江苏环太湖地区生态旅游产品的开发设计和发展初探[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2000,23(4)：126-129.
[11]张青年,杨云.农业旅游资源开发研究[J].湖北大学学报(自然科学版),1999,21(4)：405-408.
[12]张莹.我国农业旅游资源开发研究[J].长春师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006,25(1)：100-102.
[13]梅虎,朱金福,汪侠.农业旅游资源定量评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005,12：142-144.
[14]周文丽,生态旅游资源综合评价指标体系及评价模型研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(3)：198-202.
[15]李本军.“三农”问题与政府行为[D].北京：中国农业科学院,2005.
[16]李强,王钊.三农的独立性与解决三农问题的战略转变[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28(3)：257-261.
[17]张卫建,卞新民.农牧结合在解决中国粮食安全问题中的作用[J].南京农业大学学报,1997,6：9-13.
[18]朱不荣.中国农业与农村可持续发展的道路[J].改革与理论,1996,6：27-30.
[19]Campbell L. Ecotourism in Rural Developing Communities. Annals of Tourism Research,1999,26(3):534-553.
[20]Fallon L D, Kriwoken L K. Community involvement in tourism infrastructure:the case of the Strahan Visitor Centre,Tasmania.Tourism Management,2003,(3):289-308.
[21]He P,Wang B Z.Landscape ecological assessment and eco-tourism development in the South Dongting Lake Wetland, China,Journal of Environmental Sciences,2003,15(2):271-278.
[22]臧冠荣,张春林.长三角城市旅游发展及其对比分析[J].中国城市经济,2004,11：25-29.
[23]韩汉君.长三角地区第三产业发展的就业增长效应研究[J].长三角联合网,2004：1-17
[24]王小润,冯蕾.旅游业：如何带动结构优化升级.光明日报.2009-9-6,B5版.
[25]Lin Y F, Justin. Prohibition of factor market exchanges and technological choice in Chinese agriculture.The Journal of Development Studies,1991,11 (4):321-348.
[26]韩佳.长江三角洲区域经济一体化发展研究[D].上海：华东师范大学,2008.
[27]新华网.[新华纵横]太湖蓝藻事件追踪.[EB/OL]. [2007-6-7](2009-10-16) http://news.xinhuanet.com/video/2007-06/08/content_6215092.htm.
[28]Bill Bramwell,Bernard Lane.Rural Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development[M].US:Channel View Pubilication,1994.
[29]Ceballos-Lascurain, Hector.1988a. The Future of Ecotourism. In Mexico Journal:January 17: 13-14.
[30]Hohn H J H.Agritourism—A new sector of rural integrated development.Malaysia and Germany as case studies[J].Applied Geography&Development,1994,36 (3):113-126.
[31]Suzanne W,Daniel R,Fesenmaier,et al.Factors for Sueess in Rural Tourism Development,Journal of Travel Research,2001,40:132-138.
[32]王兴水,尚志海.国外观光农业研究综述[J].云南地理环境研究,2006,18(6)：75-78
[33]Arie Reichel,Oded Lowengart,Ady Milman.Rural tourism in Israel service quality and orientation [J]. Tourism Management,2000 (21):451-459.
[34]Aliza Fleischer, A.T..Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture?,Tourism Management,2005(26): 493-501.
[35]Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. McGraw-Hill, New York,1980.
[36]Asahi T, Turo D, Shneiderman B. Using treemaps to visualize the Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Maryland Department of Computer Science Technical Report CS-TR-3293 1994,6:152-161.
[37]刘学毅.德尔菲法在交义学科研究评价中的运用[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2007,8(2)：21-25.
[38]徐蔼婷.德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J].中国统计,2006,9：57-59.
[39]McGillivray M, White H.Measuring development? The UNDP's human development index[J]. Journal of Intern.1993,12(5):183-192.
[40]Hardi P, Barg S.Measuring Sustainable Development:Review of Current Practice[R]. Toronto: International Insitute for Sustainable Development,1997.
[41]WWF-Canada. Living Planet Report 2008.[2010-2-20] http://wwf.ca/newsroom/reports/living_planet_report_2008.cfm.
[42]Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P,et al.National natural captical accounting with the ecological footprint Concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999(29):375-390.
[43]Barrett J, Birch R, Cherrett N, Wiedmann T. Exploring the application of the Ecological Footprint to sustainable consumption policy [J]. Journal of Intern.2005(2):79-83.
[44]Becker D R, Harris C C. A participatory approach to social impact assessment:the interactive community forum.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2003,(3):367-382.
[45]Wackernagel J,David Yount. Footprints for sustainability:the next steps, Environment Development and Sustainability,2000 (2):21-42.
[46]Colin Hunter,Jon Shaw. The ecological footprint as a key indicator of sustainable tourism.Tourism Management,2005,13 (2):88-93.
[47]Yooshik Yoon,Dogan Gursoy,Joseph S,et al. Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling.Tourism Management,2001,(2):363-372.
[48]新华网.中国确定“乡村游”为2006年旅游主题[EB/OL]. [2005-12-28](2009-10-10) http://www.china.com.cn/chinese/MATERIAL/1076389.htm.
[49]新华网.三亚举行"2009中国生态旅游年”启动仪式.[EB/OL]. [2009-1-1](2009-10-10) http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2009-01/01/content_10588362.htm.
[50]程振琇.台湾观光休闲农业崛起的社会背景与发展状况分析[J].台湾农业探索,1993,7：4-7.
[51]李加林,童亿勤,时媛媛,等.中国乡村旅游研究综述[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2009,22(1)：91-95.
[52]段兆麟.台湾休闲农业发展及提供借鉴之经验[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,26(8)：263-269.
[53]吴加志.台湾休闲农业发展的经验对新农村建设的启示[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(1)：437-440.
[54]严力蛟.台湾休闲观光农业的发展及对我们的启示[J].新农村,2007,11：29.
[55]程道品,梅虎.农业旅游研究综述[J].改革与战略,2004,10：28-31.
[56]世界自然基金会(WWF),中国环境与发展国际合作委员会.中国生态足迹报告[EB/OL].(2008-6-27) [2009-12-23] http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploads/China_Report_zh.pdf.
[57]李利锋,成升魁.生态占用——衡量可持续发展的新指标[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4)：375-382.
[58]侯瑜,可持续发展测度指标：“生态脚印”评述[J].统计研究,2001,8：62-63.
[59]徐中民,程国栋,张志强.生态足迹方法的理论解析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2006,16(6)：69-78.
[60]徐中民,张志强.可持续发展定量指标体系的分类和评价[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(4)：82-87.
[61]徐中民,程国栋,张志强.生态足迹方法：可持续性定量研究的新方法—以张掖地区1995年的生态足迹计算为例[J].生态学报,2001,21(9)：1484-1493.
[62]Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. Ecological footprints of Nations. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the rio+ 5 forum. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Toronto.1997.4-12.
[63]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态足迹的概念及计算模型[J].生态经济,2000,10：8-10.
[64]赵先贵,肖玲,兰叶霞,等.陕西省生态足迹和生态承载力动态研究[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(4)：746-753.
[65]Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environmental Urban,1992,4(2):121-130.
[66]Chambers N, Simmons C.Wackernagel M.Sharing Nature's Interest:Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability[M]. Earthscan, London,2000.
[67]中国网.中国各省区市生态文明大排名：谁的生态最文明[EB/OL].(2009-08-24) [2009-12-26] http://news.china.com.cn/txt/2009-08/24/content_18392751.htm.
[68]周国忠.旅游生态足迹研究进展[J].生态经济,2007,2：92-95.
[69]杨桂华,李鹏.旅游生态足迹的理论意义探讨[J].旅游学刊,2007,22(2)：54-58.
[70]卢云亭.生态旅游学[M].北京：旅游教育出版社,2001.
[71]章锦河,张捷.旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(5)：763-771.
[72]章锦河,张捷.国外生态足迹模型修正与前沿研究进展[J].资源科学,2006,28(6)：196-203.
[73]杨桂华,李鹏.旅游生态足迹：测度旅游可持续发展的新方法[J].生态学报,2005,25(6)：1475-1480.
[74]曹辉,陈秋华.福州市旅游生态足迹动态[J].生态学报,2007,27(11)：4686-4695.
[75]谢雨萍,向悟生.旅游生态足迹模型在生态农业旅游可持续发展中的应用_以广西恭城瑶族自治县红岩村为例[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(12)：5128-5131.
[76]甄翌,康文星.旅游生态足迹改进模型及张家界实证研究[J].林业经济问题,2008,28(4)：306-309.
[77]Higgins-Desbiolles F.More than an industry:The forgotten power of tourism as a social force.Tourism Management,2006,(27):1192-1208.
[78]Wackernagel M.Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2002,99(14):9266-9271.
[79]江苏省统计局江苏省第二次农业普查领导小组办公室.江苏省第二次农业普查主要数据公报(第一号).2008-4-21.
[80]中国乡村网.发展乡村旅游对于农业循环经济建设的重要意义[EB/OL].(2009-11-24)[2009-12-21] http://www.zgxc.org.cn/sheng/show.php?id=521206.
[81]国家旅游局资源开发司.中国旅游资源普查规范[M].北京：中国旅游出版社.1993
[82]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.旅游资源分类、调查与评价(GB/T18972-2003)中华人民共和国国家标准.2003年2月24.
[83]Edward I.Tourism Planning:An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. Boston: International Thomson Business Press.1991:58-63.
[84]Embacher H. Marketing for Agritourism in Austria:Strategy and Realization in a Highly Developed Tourist Destination, Journal of Sustainable Tourism,1994.
[85]Gill G. A. The effects of "on farm tourism" on the rural community and on farming in the United Kingdom, Tourism Recreation Research,1991.
[86]李学东,郭焕成.西南地区观光农业发展与经营特点初探—以成都市龙泉驿区“农家乐”为例[J].经济地理,2001,3：149-153.
[87]程道晶.生态旅游开发模式及案例[M].北京：中国科学出版社,2006.
[88]王小磊,张兆胤,王征兵.试论乡村旅游与农业旅游[J].经济问题探索,2007,2：155-158.
[89]章家恩.关于农业生态旅游的几点看法[J].农村生态环境,2000,16(1)：56-59.
[90]严贤春,苏智先.水土保持与生态农业旅游技术研究--以四川省南充市嘉陵区木老乡生态农业旅游区为例[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(6)：157-161.
[91]郑光中,张敏,袁牧.生态城市·生态农业·生态旅游--以深圳西海岸生态农业旅游区规划为例[J].建筑学报,2000,5：4-7.
[92]戴斌.中国与国外乡村旅游发展模式比较研究[J].江西科技师范学院学报,2006,2(1)：16-23.
[93]金茨萍,金一萍,黄郁成.国外乡村旅游的理论与实践[J].南京社会科学,2007,10：91-97.
[94]王云才.中国乡村旅游发展的新形态和新模式[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(4)：8-9.
[95]卢云亭,刘军平.观光农业[M].北京：北京出版社,1995.
[96]范子文,卢云亭.在北京市郊区建立观光农业开发区的构想[J].中国农业资源与区划,1995,5：23-27.
[97]成升魁,徐增让,李琛,等.休闲农业研究进展及其若干理论问题[J].旅游学刊,2005,20：26-30.
[98]邹统钎.基于生态链的休闲农业发展模式—北京蟹岛度假村的旅游循环经济研究[J].北京第外国语学院学报,2005,1：64-69.
[99]江华.开发旅游农业大有可为[J].地域研究与开发,1995,1：38-41.
[100]唐德彪.西部旅游农业资源可持续开发研究[J].邵阳学院学报,2003,5(2)：235-238.
[101]胡卫华,王庆.“农家乐”旅游开发探析[J].城乡建设,2002,8：62-63.
[102]田喜洲.论“农家乐”旅游经济[J].农村经济,2002,11：61-62.
[103]陈文君.都市农业旅游与都市可持续发展研究—以广州为例[J].经济地理,2005,25(6)：915-919.
[104]D.Getz, Page S.J. Conclusions and Implications for Rural Business Development, in The Business of Rural Tourism,Boston:International Thomson Business Press,1997.
[105]Wang F,Wang Y.On the Unified Concept of "Eco-agricultural Tourism", Journal of Landscape Research,2009,11(1):86-93.
[106]Duncan Hilchey, Agritourism in New York State:Opportunities and Challenges in Farm-Based Recreation and Hospitality, Farming Alternatives Program, Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, November 1993.
[107]Rob Holland, Kent Wolfe.Targeting School Groups for Agritainment Enterprises:A Summary of Schoolteacher Survey in Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service,The University of Tennessee,2009.
[108]沈中印,曹诗图,黄华.试论宜吕旅游业和农业的互动与整合[J].特区经济,2005,3：46-49.
[109]秦志华,李可心,陈先奎.中国农村工作大辞典[M].北京：警官教育出版社,1993：147.
[110]农业大词典编辑委员会编.农业大词典[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1998：1006.
[111]何盛明.财经大辞典[M]·上卷.北京：中国财政经济出版社,1990：871.
[112]江伟钰,陈方林.资源环境法词典[M].北京：中国法制出版社,2005：366.
[113]王济吕.现代科学技术名词选编[M].郑州：河南科学技术出版社,2006：263.
[114]严贤春.生态农业旅游[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2008.
[115]谢雨萍.生态农业旅游开发知识与实例[M].南宁：广西师范大学出版社,2008.
[116]秦海旭,万玉秋,夏远芬.生态旅游的彻底泛化研究及其概念模型的构建[J].环境科学与管理,2006,9(2)：679-684.
[117]郭舒.生态旅游概念泛化思考[J].旅游学刊,2002,1：61-65.
[118]杨建华,刘宁宁.河南农业观光旅游资源定量评价与分析[J].河南教育学院学报(自然科学),2008,17(1)：46-48.
[119]胡娟,师谦友,范化冬.西安乡村旅游资源定量评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学),2009,8(2)：117-121.
[120]彼德·蒙德尔.经济学解说(第三版)[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2000.
[121]郭秀锐,杨居荣,毛显强.城市生态足迹计算与分析——以广州为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(5)：654-662.
[122]黄震方,袁林旺,黄燕玲,等.生态旅游资源定量评价指标体系与评价方法--以江苏海滨为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(4)：1655-1662.
[123]尹占娥,殷杰,许世远.上海乡村旅游资源定量评价研究[J].旅游学刊,2007,22(8)：59-63.
[124]王晓丽,宋书巧,张建勇,李兆华.广西乡村旅游资源定量评价——以阳朔为例[J].广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006,23(3)：45-48.
[125]吕祯婷,罗世俊,谢晶晶.皖南黄山区乡村旅游资源评价及开发建议[J].黄山学院学报,2008,10(2)：27-31.
[126]蔡碧凡.乡村旅游示范区评价指标体系与标准的构建研究[D].长沙：中南林学院,2005.
[127]张卫东,樊燕超.江苏统计年鉴[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2009.
[128]苏州市旅游局规划统计处.2008年苏州旅游统计报告,2009.
[129]无锡市旅游局.2008年无锡市旅游业国内旅游年度旅游报告,2009.
[130]常州市旅游局.2008年常州旅游统计,2009.
[131]张浩亮.观光旅游生态农业绩效评价体系的建立方法[J].农业环境与发展,2007,6：45-47.
[132]金艳春.乡村旅游资源定量评价体系研究[D].沈阳：沈阳师范大学,2007.
[133]章家恩,骆世明.经济全球化背景下中国农业生态学面临的新问题与新任务[J］.农村生态环境,2003,19(3)：45-48.
[134]中华人民共和国国家旅游局.优秀旅游目的地_中华人民共和国国家旅游局[EB/OL]. [2009-12-20] http://www.cnta.gov.cn:8000/Forms/ExcellentDes/ExcellentDesList.aspx?catalogType=view&res ultType=4A&imgOn=3&menuType=ExcellentDes#.
[135]徐伟荣.长江三角洲与环太湖城市圈[J].江南论坛,2003,7：12-13.
[136]徐伟荣.整体规划“环太湖城市圈”[J].长三角发展论坛,2003,9：12-13.
[137]徐伟荣.应当构建环太湖城市圈[J].城市规划通讯,2004,5：11.
[138]王雯.从“环太湖经济圈”的特征看其存在问题及对策[J].苏州市职业大学学报,2007,18(2)：15-17.
[139]喻学才.对环太湖旅游圈推进一体化进程的思考[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,9(5)：51-55.
[140]黄震方,丁正山,李想.环太湖旅游带旅游业联合发展战略初探[J].经济地理,1999,19(6)： 114-117.
[141]王锋,王永.环太湖生态农业旅游圈资源综合评价与发展建议[J].农业现代化研究,2010,31(1)：60-64.
[142]王桥,张兵,韦玉春,等.太湖水体环境遥感监测实验及其软件实现(精)[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[143]苏伟忠,杨桂山,陈爽.太湖流域湖西区城市化空间过程及其生态效应[J].生态学报,2008,28(9)：4306-4318.
[144]上海社科院城市化发展研究中心.2008年度长三角区域城市综合竞争力评价[EB/OL]. (2008-12-28)[2009-12-12] http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=518736103.
[145]Chenery, Hollis B. Comparative Advantage and Development Policy.American Economic Review, 1961,1(51):18-51.
[146]List J A, Gallet C. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve:Does One Size Fit All?" Ecological Economics,1999.31:409-23.
[147]Liu X,Heilig,Chen J, et al.2007. "Interactions between Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Shenzhen, China's First Special Economic Zone." Ecological Economics 62(3,4):559-70.
[148]2009长三角城市发展报告出炉.江苏省城市发展研究院和长三角城市发展研究中心[EB/OL].(2009-5-19)[2009-10-23] http://city.finance.sina.com.cn/city/2009-05-19/112395.html.
[149]H·钱纳里,S-鲁宾逊,M·赛尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海：三联书店出版社.1989.
[150]苏州新闻网.2008年苏州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-1-12) http://www.subaonet.com/html/importnews/2009112/IFBF9G56K.H912GI_3.html.
[151]无锡日报网.2008年无锡市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-2-10) http://www.wxrb.com/szb/wxrb/html/2009-02/24/content_186107.htm.
[152]常州统计信息网.2008年常州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-3-16) http://www.cztjj.gov.cn/node/Tjsj_Tjgb/2009-3/16/11_22_20_980_2.html.
[153]中共湖州市委党校.2008年湖州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-2-21) http://www.hzdx.com/inc/news_show.asp?id=755.
[154]Zhang Jianghua. yaahp v0.5.1[EB/OL].(2009-7-29) [2009-10-29] http://www.jeffzhang.cn/.
[155]李克平.2010年上海世博会客流预测分析[J].交通与运输,2005,5(1)：21-22.
[156]Stefan N,Belly W.Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability [J].Ecological Economics,2002,43:199-211.
[157]Wiedmann T,Minx J,Barrett J.Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis,2006:206-219.
[158]William E R. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out? [J].Environment Urban,1992,4(2):121-130.
[159]Gossling S. Ecological footprint analyses as a tool assess tourism sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,43(2/3):199-211.
[160]浙江省统计局,国家统计局.2009年浙江统计年鉴(中英文对照)[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2009.
[161]中华人民共和国国家统计局.第二次全国农业普查公报[EB/OL].(2009-3-19) http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/nypcgb/.
[162]宋旭光.可持续发展测度方法的系统分析[D].沈阳：东北财经大学,2002.
[163]李文华.可持续发展的生态学思考[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2009,21(3)：215-220.
[164]张恒义,刘卫东,林育欣,等.基于改进生态足迹模型的浙江省域生态足迹分析[J].生态学报,2009,29(5)：2738-2748.
[165]李清娟.长三角都市圈产业一体化研究[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2007.
[166]周长江,高速铁路发展概况及展望.[J].科技交流,2005,2：38-42.
[167]碳排放量.百度百科.[EB/OL].(2009-1-2)[2009-10-20] http://baike.baidu.com/view/3065296.htm.
[168]白艳莹,王效科,欧阳志云,等.苏锡常地区生态足迹分析[J].资源科学,2003,25(6)：31-37.
[169]王锋,王永.浅谈农业类高职院校GIS专业及课程设置[J].农业网络信息,2008,12：101-103.
[170]张卫建,丁艳锋,王龙俊,等.稻田生态系统在保障环太湖环境健康与经济持续增长中的重要作用[J].科技导报,2007,25(17)：24-29.
[171]中华人民共和国中央人民政府.国家旅游局、农业部关于大力推进全国乡村旅游发展的通知[EB/OL].(2007-4-20) http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2007-04/20/content_589484.htm.
[172]国务院办公厅.国务院关于进一步推进长江三角洲地区改革开放和经济社会发展的指导意见.国发(2008］30号.2008-9-16.
[173]王枫云.和谐共进中的政府协调—长三角城市群的实证研究[M].广州：中山大学出版社,2009
[174]中国新闻网.无锡牵头发表环太湖旅游合作组织共同宣言[EB/OL]. (2005-5-31) [2009-10-20] http://www.co188.com/if_37559158_1.htm.
[175]Haberl H,Erb KH, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time:the case of Australia 1926-1995·Ecological Economics,2001,38:25-45.
[176]Lenzen M,Murray S. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia.Ecological Economics,2001,37:229-255.
[177]张壬午.论生态示范区建设与生态农业产业化[J].农村生态环境,2000,16(2)：31-34,52.
[178]邹统钎.乡村旅游发展的围城效应与对策[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(3)：8-9.
[2]王琼英,冯学钢.乡村旅游研究综述[J］.北京国语学院学报,2006,1：115-120.
[3]He J M, Li H,Wang Q. Rural Tourism in China:A Case Study of Nongjiale in the Chengdu Metropolitan Area. Mountain Research and Development,2004,24(3):260-262.
[4]刘德谦.关于乡村旅游、农业旅游与民俗旅游的几点辨析[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(3)：12-19.
[5]魏敏,冯永军,李芬,等.农业生态旅游可持续发展评价指标体系研究[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(1)：27-30.
[6]王继庆.我国乡村旅游可持续发展问题研究[D].沈阳：东北林业大学,2007.
[7]Jiang Y Y,Wang Y L, Peng J. Measuring tourism area sustainability based on tourism ecological footprint:a case study in Lijiang Naxi Autonomous County. Geographical Research,2006,25 (06): 1134-1142.
[8]Xiong D G, Xian X F, Jiang Y D. Discussion on ecological footprint theory applied to regional sustainable development evaluation. Progress in Geography,2003,22 (6):618-626.
[9]李燕琴.基于概念、原则与产品的生态旅游内涵研究[J].科技导报,2004,11：35-39.
[10]陶卓民,储震.江苏环太湖地区生态旅游产品的开发设计和发展初探[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2000,23(4)：126-129.
[11]张青年,杨云.农业旅游资源开发研究[J].湖北大学学报(自然科学版),1999,21(4)：405-408.
[12]张莹.我国农业旅游资源开发研究[J].长春师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006,25(1)：100-102.
[13]梅虎,朱金福,汪侠.农业旅游资源定量评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005,12：142-144.
[14]周文丽,生态旅游资源综合评价指标体系及评价模型研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(3)：198-202.
[15]李本军.“三农”问题与政府行为[D].北京：中国农业科学院,2005.
[16]李强,王钊.三农的独立性与解决三农问题的战略转变[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28(3)：257-261.
[17]张卫建,卞新民.农牧结合在解决中国粮食安全问题中的作用[J].南京农业大学学报,1997,6：9-13.
[18]朱不荣.中国农业与农村可持续发展的道路[J].改革与理论,1996,6：27-30.
[19]Campbell L. Ecotourism in Rural Developing Communities. Annals of Tourism Research,1999,26(3):534-553.
[20]Fallon L D, Kriwoken L K. Community involvement in tourism infrastructure:the case of the Strahan Visitor Centre,Tasmania.Tourism Management,2003,(3):289-308.
[21]He P,Wang B Z.Landscape ecological assessment and eco-tourism development in the South Dongting Lake Wetland, China,Journal of Environmental Sciences,2003,15(2):271-278.
[22]臧冠荣,张春林.长三角城市旅游发展及其对比分析[J].中国城市经济,2004,11：25-29.
[23]韩汉君.长三角地区第三产业发展的就业增长效应研究[J].长三角联合网,2004：1-17
[24]王小润,冯蕾.旅游业：如何带动结构优化升级.光明日报.2009-9-6,B5版.
[25]Lin Y F, Justin. Prohibition of factor market exchanges and technological choice in Chinese agriculture.The Journal of Development Studies,1991,11 (4):321-348.
[26]韩佳.长江三角洲区域经济一体化发展研究[D].上海：华东师范大学,2008.
[27]新华网.[新华纵横]太湖蓝藻事件追踪.[EB/OL]. [2007-6-7](2009-10-16) http://news.xinhuanet.com/video/2007-06/08/content_6215092.htm.
[28]Bill Bramwell,Bernard Lane.Rural Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development[M].US:Channel View Pubilication,1994.
[29]Ceballos-Lascurain, Hector.1988a. The Future of Ecotourism. In Mexico Journal:January 17: 13-14.
[30]Hohn H J H.Agritourism—A new sector of rural integrated development.Malaysia and Germany as case studies[J].Applied Geography&Development,1994,36 (3):113-126.
[31]Suzanne W,Daniel R,Fesenmaier,et al.Factors for Sueess in Rural Tourism Development,Journal of Travel Research,2001,40:132-138.
[32]王兴水,尚志海.国外观光农业研究综述[J].云南地理环境研究,2006,18(6)：75-78
[33]Arie Reichel,Oded Lowengart,Ady Milman.Rural tourism in Israel service quality and orientation [J]. Tourism Management,2000 (21):451-459.
[34]Aliza Fleischer, A.T..Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture?,Tourism Management,2005(26): 493-501.
[35]Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. McGraw-Hill, New York,1980.
[36]Asahi T, Turo D, Shneiderman B. Using treemaps to visualize the Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Maryland Department of Computer Science Technical Report CS-TR-3293 1994,6:152-161.
[37]刘学毅.德尔菲法在交义学科研究评价中的运用[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2007,8(2)：21-25.
[38]徐蔼婷.德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J].中国统计,2006,9：57-59.
[39]McGillivray M, White H.Measuring development? The UNDP's human development index[J]. Journal of Intern.1993,12(5):183-192.
[40]Hardi P, Barg S.Measuring Sustainable Development:Review of Current Practice[R]. Toronto: International Insitute for Sustainable Development,1997.
[41]WWF-Canada. Living Planet Report 2008.[2010-2-20] http://wwf.ca/newsroom/reports/living_planet_report_2008.cfm.
[42]Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P,et al.National natural captical accounting with the ecological footprint Concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999(29):375-390.
[43]Barrett J, Birch R, Cherrett N, Wiedmann T. Exploring the application of the Ecological Footprint to sustainable consumption policy [J]. Journal of Intern.2005(2):79-83.
[44]Becker D R, Harris C C. A participatory approach to social impact assessment:the interactive community forum.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2003,(3):367-382.
[45]Wackernagel J,David Yount. Footprints for sustainability:the next steps, Environment Development and Sustainability,2000 (2):21-42.
[46]Colin Hunter,Jon Shaw. The ecological footprint as a key indicator of sustainable tourism.Tourism Management,2005,13 (2):88-93.
[47]Yooshik Yoon,Dogan Gursoy,Joseph S,et al. Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling.Tourism Management,2001,(2):363-372.
[48]新华网.中国确定“乡村游”为2006年旅游主题[EB/OL]. [2005-12-28](2009-10-10) http://www.china.com.cn/chinese/MATERIAL/1076389.htm.
[49]新华网.三亚举行"2009中国生态旅游年”启动仪式.[EB/OL]. [2009-1-1](2009-10-10) http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2009-01/01/content_10588362.htm.
[50]程振琇.台湾观光休闲农业崛起的社会背景与发展状况分析[J].台湾农业探索,1993,7：4-7.
[51]李加林,童亿勤,时媛媛,等.中国乡村旅游研究综述[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2009,22(1)：91-95.
[52]段兆麟.台湾休闲农业发展及提供借鉴之经验[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,26(8)：263-269.
[53]吴加志.台湾休闲农业发展的经验对新农村建设的启示[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(1)：437-440.
[54]严力蛟.台湾休闲观光农业的发展及对我们的启示[J].新农村,2007,11：29.
[55]程道品,梅虎.农业旅游研究综述[J].改革与战略,2004,10：28-31.
[56]世界自然基金会(WWF),中国环境与发展国际合作委员会.中国生态足迹报告[EB/OL].(2008-6-27) [2009-12-23] http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploads/China_Report_zh.pdf.
[57]李利锋,成升魁.生态占用——衡量可持续发展的新指标[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4)：375-382.
[58]侯瑜,可持续发展测度指标：“生态脚印”评述[J].统计研究,2001,8：62-63.
[59]徐中民,程国栋,张志强.生态足迹方法的理论解析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2006,16(6)：69-78.
[60]徐中民,张志强.可持续发展定量指标体系的分类和评价[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(4)：82-87.
[61]徐中民,程国栋,张志强.生态足迹方法：可持续性定量研究的新方法—以张掖地区1995年的生态足迹计算为例[J].生态学报,2001,21(9)：1484-1493.
[62]Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. Ecological footprints of Nations. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the rio+ 5 forum. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Toronto.1997.4-12.
[63]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态足迹的概念及计算模型[J].生态经济,2000,10：8-10.
[64]赵先贵,肖玲,兰叶霞,等.陕西省生态足迹和生态承载力动态研究[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(4)：746-753.
[65]Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environmental Urban,1992,4(2):121-130.
[66]Chambers N, Simmons C.Wackernagel M.Sharing Nature's Interest:Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability[M]. Earthscan, London,2000.
[67]中国网.中国各省区市生态文明大排名：谁的生态最文明[EB/OL].(2009-08-24) [2009-12-26] http://news.china.com.cn/txt/2009-08/24/content_18392751.htm.
[68]周国忠.旅游生态足迹研究进展[J].生态经济,2007,2：92-95.
[69]杨桂华,李鹏.旅游生态足迹的理论意义探讨[J].旅游学刊,2007,22(2)：54-58.
[70]卢云亭.生态旅游学[M].北京：旅游教育出版社,2001.
[71]章锦河,张捷.旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(5)：763-771.
[72]章锦河,张捷.国外生态足迹模型修正与前沿研究进展[J].资源科学,2006,28(6)：196-203.
[73]杨桂华,李鹏.旅游生态足迹：测度旅游可持续发展的新方法[J].生态学报,2005,25(6)：1475-1480.
[74]曹辉,陈秋华.福州市旅游生态足迹动态[J].生态学报,2007,27(11)：4686-4695.
[75]谢雨萍,向悟生.旅游生态足迹模型在生态农业旅游可持续发展中的应用_以广西恭城瑶族自治县红岩村为例[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(12)：5128-5131.
[76]甄翌,康文星.旅游生态足迹改进模型及张家界实证研究[J].林业经济问题,2008,28(4)：306-309.
[77]Higgins-Desbiolles F.More than an industry:The forgotten power of tourism as a social force.Tourism Management,2006,(27):1192-1208.
[78]Wackernagel M.Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2002,99(14):9266-9271.
[79]江苏省统计局江苏省第二次农业普查领导小组办公室.江苏省第二次农业普查主要数据公报(第一号).2008-4-21.
[80]中国乡村网.发展乡村旅游对于农业循环经济建设的重要意义[EB/OL].(2009-11-24)[2009-12-21] http://www.zgxc.org.cn/sheng/show.php?id=521206.
[81]国家旅游局资源开发司.中国旅游资源普查规范[M].北京：中国旅游出版社.1993
[82]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.旅游资源分类、调查与评价(GB/T18972-2003)中华人民共和国国家标准.2003年2月24.
[83]Edward I.Tourism Planning:An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. Boston: International Thomson Business Press.1991:58-63.
[84]Embacher H. Marketing for Agritourism in Austria:Strategy and Realization in a Highly Developed Tourist Destination, Journal of Sustainable Tourism,1994.
[85]Gill G. A. The effects of "on farm tourism" on the rural community and on farming in the United Kingdom, Tourism Recreation Research,1991.
[86]李学东,郭焕成.西南地区观光农业发展与经营特点初探—以成都市龙泉驿区“农家乐”为例[J].经济地理,2001,3：149-153.
[87]程道晶.生态旅游开发模式及案例[M].北京：中国科学出版社,2006.
[88]王小磊,张兆胤,王征兵.试论乡村旅游与农业旅游[J].经济问题探索,2007,2：155-158.
[89]章家恩.关于农业生态旅游的几点看法[J].农村生态环境,2000,16(1)：56-59.
[90]严贤春,苏智先.水土保持与生态农业旅游技术研究--以四川省南充市嘉陵区木老乡生态农业旅游区为例[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(6)：157-161.
[91]郑光中,张敏,袁牧.生态城市·生态农业·生态旅游--以深圳西海岸生态农业旅游区规划为例[J].建筑学报,2000,5：4-7.
[92]戴斌.中国与国外乡村旅游发展模式比较研究[J].江西科技师范学院学报,2006,2(1)：16-23.
[93]金茨萍,金一萍,黄郁成.国外乡村旅游的理论与实践[J].南京社会科学,2007,10：91-97.
[94]王云才.中国乡村旅游发展的新形态和新模式[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(4)：8-9.
[95]卢云亭,刘军平.观光农业[M].北京：北京出版社,1995.
[96]范子文,卢云亭.在北京市郊区建立观光农业开发区的构想[J].中国农业资源与区划,1995,5：23-27.
[97]成升魁,徐增让,李琛,等.休闲农业研究进展及其若干理论问题[J].旅游学刊,2005,20：26-30.
[98]邹统钎.基于生态链的休闲农业发展模式—北京蟹岛度假村的旅游循环经济研究[J].北京第外国语学院学报,2005,1：64-69.
[99]江华.开发旅游农业大有可为[J].地域研究与开发,1995,1：38-41.
[100]唐德彪.西部旅游农业资源可持续开发研究[J].邵阳学院学报,2003,5(2)：235-238.
[101]胡卫华,王庆.“农家乐”旅游开发探析[J].城乡建设,2002,8：62-63.
[102]田喜洲.论“农家乐”旅游经济[J].农村经济,2002,11：61-62.
[103]陈文君.都市农业旅游与都市可持续发展研究—以广州为例[J].经济地理,2005,25(6)：915-919.
[104]D.Getz, Page S.J. Conclusions and Implications for Rural Business Development, in The Business of Rural Tourism,Boston:International Thomson Business Press,1997.
[105]Wang F,Wang Y.On the Unified Concept of "Eco-agricultural Tourism", Journal of Landscape Research,2009,11(1):86-93.
[106]Duncan Hilchey, Agritourism in New York State:Opportunities and Challenges in Farm-Based Recreation and Hospitality, Farming Alternatives Program, Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, November 1993.
[107]Rob Holland, Kent Wolfe.Targeting School Groups for Agritainment Enterprises:A Summary of Schoolteacher Survey in Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service,The University of Tennessee,2009.
[108]沈中印,曹诗图,黄华.试论宜吕旅游业和农业的互动与整合[J].特区经济,2005,3：46-49.
[109]秦志华,李可心,陈先奎.中国农村工作大辞典[M].北京：警官教育出版社,1993：147.
[110]农业大词典编辑委员会编.农业大词典[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1998：1006.
[111]何盛明.财经大辞典[M]·上卷.北京：中国财政经济出版社,1990：871.
[112]江伟钰,陈方林.资源环境法词典[M].北京：中国法制出版社,2005：366.
[113]王济吕.现代科学技术名词选编[M].郑州：河南科学技术出版社,2006：263.
[114]严贤春.生态农业旅游[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2008.
[115]谢雨萍.生态农业旅游开发知识与实例[M].南宁：广西师范大学出版社,2008.
[116]秦海旭,万玉秋,夏远芬.生态旅游的彻底泛化研究及其概念模型的构建[J].环境科学与管理,2006,9(2)：679-684.
[117]郭舒.生态旅游概念泛化思考[J].旅游学刊,2002,1：61-65.
[118]杨建华,刘宁宁.河南农业观光旅游资源定量评价与分析[J].河南教育学院学报(自然科学),2008,17(1)：46-48.
[119]胡娟,师谦友,范化冬.西安乡村旅游资源定量评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学),2009,8(2)：117-121.
[120]彼德·蒙德尔.经济学解说(第三版)[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2000.
[121]郭秀锐,杨居荣,毛显强.城市生态足迹计算与分析——以广州为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(5)：654-662.
[122]黄震方,袁林旺,黄燕玲,等.生态旅游资源定量评价指标体系与评价方法--以江苏海滨为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(4)：1655-1662.
[123]尹占娥,殷杰,许世远.上海乡村旅游资源定量评价研究[J].旅游学刊,2007,22(8)：59-63.
[124]王晓丽,宋书巧,张建勇,李兆华.广西乡村旅游资源定量评价——以阳朔为例[J].广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006,23(3)：45-48.
[125]吕祯婷,罗世俊,谢晶晶.皖南黄山区乡村旅游资源评价及开发建议[J].黄山学院学报,2008,10(2)：27-31.
[126]蔡碧凡.乡村旅游示范区评价指标体系与标准的构建研究[D].长沙：中南林学院,2005.
[127]张卫东,樊燕超.江苏统计年鉴[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2009.
[128]苏州市旅游局规划统计处.2008年苏州旅游统计报告,2009.
[129]无锡市旅游局.2008年无锡市旅游业国内旅游年度旅游报告,2009.
[130]常州市旅游局.2008年常州旅游统计,2009.
[131]张浩亮.观光旅游生态农业绩效评价体系的建立方法[J].农业环境与发展,2007,6：45-47.
[132]金艳春.乡村旅游资源定量评价体系研究[D].沈阳：沈阳师范大学,2007.
[133]章家恩,骆世明.经济全球化背景下中国农业生态学面临的新问题与新任务[J］.农村生态环境,2003,19(3)：45-48.
[134]中华人民共和国国家旅游局.优秀旅游目的地_中华人民共和国国家旅游局[EB/OL]. [2009-12-20] http://www.cnta.gov.cn:8000/Forms/ExcellentDes/ExcellentDesList.aspx?catalogType=view&res ultType=4A&imgOn=3&menuType=ExcellentDes#.
[135]徐伟荣.长江三角洲与环太湖城市圈[J].江南论坛,2003,7：12-13.
[136]徐伟荣.整体规划“环太湖城市圈”[J].长三角发展论坛,2003,9：12-13.
[137]徐伟荣.应当构建环太湖城市圈[J].城市规划通讯,2004,5：11.
[138]王雯.从“环太湖经济圈”的特征看其存在问题及对策[J].苏州市职业大学学报,2007,18(2)：15-17.
[139]喻学才.对环太湖旅游圈推进一体化进程的思考[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,9(5)：51-55.
[140]黄震方,丁正山,李想.环太湖旅游带旅游业联合发展战略初探[J].经济地理,1999,19(6)： 114-117.
[141]王锋,王永.环太湖生态农业旅游圈资源综合评价与发展建议[J].农业现代化研究,2010,31(1)：60-64.
[142]王桥,张兵,韦玉春,等.太湖水体环境遥感监测实验及其软件实现(精)[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[143]苏伟忠,杨桂山,陈爽.太湖流域湖西区城市化空间过程及其生态效应[J].生态学报,2008,28(9)：4306-4318.
[144]上海社科院城市化发展研究中心.2008年度长三角区域城市综合竞争力评价[EB/OL]. (2008-12-28)[2009-12-12] http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=518736103.
[145]Chenery, Hollis B. Comparative Advantage and Development Policy.American Economic Review, 1961,1(51):18-51.
[146]List J A, Gallet C. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve:Does One Size Fit All?" Ecological Economics,1999.31:409-23.
[147]Liu X,Heilig,Chen J, et al.2007. "Interactions between Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Shenzhen, China's First Special Economic Zone." Ecological Economics 62(3,4):559-70.
[148]2009长三角城市发展报告出炉.江苏省城市发展研究院和长三角城市发展研究中心[EB/OL].(2009-5-19)[2009-10-23] http://city.finance.sina.com.cn/city/2009-05-19/112395.html.
[149]H·钱纳里,S-鲁宾逊,M·赛尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海：三联书店出版社.1989.
[150]苏州新闻网.2008年苏州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-1-12) http://www.subaonet.com/html/importnews/2009112/IFBF9G56K.H912GI_3.html.
[151]无锡日报网.2008年无锡市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-2-10) http://www.wxrb.com/szb/wxrb/html/2009-02/24/content_186107.htm.
[152]常州统计信息网.2008年常州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-3-16) http://www.cztjj.gov.cn/node/Tjsj_Tjgb/2009-3/16/11_22_20_980_2.html.
[153]中共湖州市委党校.2008年湖州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2009-2-21) http://www.hzdx.com/inc/news_show.asp?id=755.
[154]Zhang Jianghua. yaahp v0.5.1[EB/OL].(2009-7-29) [2009-10-29] http://www.jeffzhang.cn/.
[155]李克平.2010年上海世博会客流预测分析[J].交通与运输,2005,5(1)：21-22.
[156]Stefan N,Belly W.Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability [J].Ecological Economics,2002,43:199-211.
[157]Wiedmann T,Minx J,Barrett J.Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis,2006:206-219.
[158]William E R. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out? [J].Environment Urban,1992,4(2):121-130.
[159]Gossling S. Ecological footprint analyses as a tool assess tourism sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,43(2/3):199-211.
[160]浙江省统计局,国家统计局.2009年浙江统计年鉴(中英文对照)[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2009.
[161]中华人民共和国国家统计局.第二次全国农业普查公报[EB/OL].(2009-3-19) http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/nypcgb/.
[162]宋旭光.可持续发展测度方法的系统分析[D].沈阳：东北财经大学,2002.
[163]李文华.可持续发展的生态学思考[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2009,21(3)：215-220.
[164]张恒义,刘卫东,林育欣,等.基于改进生态足迹模型的浙江省域生态足迹分析[J].生态学报,2009,29(5)：2738-2748.
[165]李清娟.长三角都市圈产业一体化研究[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2007.
[166]周长江,高速铁路发展概况及展望.[J].科技交流,2005,2：38-42.
[167]碳排放量.百度百科.[EB/OL].(2009-1-2)[2009-10-20] http://baike.baidu.com/view/3065296.htm.
[168]白艳莹,王效科,欧阳志云,等.苏锡常地区生态足迹分析[J].资源科学,2003,25(6)：31-37.
[169]王锋,王永.浅谈农业类高职院校GIS专业及课程设置[J].农业网络信息,2008,12：101-103.
[170]张卫建,丁艳锋,王龙俊,等.稻田生态系统在保障环太湖环境健康与经济持续增长中的重要作用[J].科技导报,2007,25(17)：24-29.
[171]中华人民共和国中央人民政府.国家旅游局、农业部关于大力推进全国乡村旅游发展的通知[EB/OL].(2007-4-20) http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2007-04/20/content_589484.htm.
[172]国务院办公厅.国务院关于进一步推进长江三角洲地区改革开放和经济社会发展的指导意见.国发(2008］30号.2008-9-16.
[173]王枫云.和谐共进中的政府协调—长三角城市群的实证研究[M].广州：中山大学出版社,2009
[174]中国新闻网.无锡牵头发表环太湖旅游合作组织共同宣言[EB/OL]. (2005-5-31) [2009-10-20] http://www.co188.com/if_37559158_1.htm.
[175]Haberl H,Erb KH, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time:the case of Australia 1926-1995·Ecological Economics,2001,38:25-45.
[176]Lenzen M,Murray S. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia.Ecological Economics,2001,37:229-255.
[177]张壬午.论生态示范区建设与生态农业产业化[J].农村生态环境,2000,16(2)：31-34,52.
[178]邹统钎.乡村旅游发展的围城效应与对策[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(3)：8-9.