中日韩构建自由贸易区研究
|
摘要
以往关于东北亚区域合作和区域整合的研究,大多侧重于经济福利和效率层面或政治、军事战略层面中的某一个层面,而本论文采用了包含国际政治与国际关系学、国际经济与国际通商学以及区域经济与产业经济学等的“国际政治经济的开展法”进行了分析研究。
本论文以东北亚经济合作的理论研究为基础,一方面,分析了东北亚经济合作的局限性与可能性,在考察了东北亚中日韩三国缔结FTA的推进方向和发展现况的基础上,对作为东北亚主要经济合作体的中日韩FTA的必要性、先决问题、宏观经济的波及效果进行了分析。另一方面,揭示了东北亚地区所需要实现的“统一市场的FTA”的开展方法、推进方向、方式和前景。
本论文归纳了克服东北亚经济合作的障碍因素与中日韩FTA的宏观经济效果,研究了东北亚经济合作的正当性,证明了中日韩FTA应当作为东北亚经济合作首要推进内容的当为性,同时证明了该主张的正确性。总而言之,从东北亚各国的安定和市场确保的角度来看,实现中日韩三国FTA是最为适合的方案。
Title:Study on Construction of the China-Japan-Korea FTA
Major:World Economics
Academic Advisor:Professor Xu Wenji
After entering 21~(st)century,under the WTO mechanism and Multilateralism in international order,RTAs concluding is spreading quickly,and FTAs,a kind of RTA, occupy the absolute proportion.Northeast Asian area with the center of China,Japan and Korea,although occupies a great proportion in world economy,comparing with other areas,the integration of the market doesn't get actively promoted.Recently,the discussion about improving the bilateral and multi-literal FTA in Northeast Asia is getting active again,so far,not only its purpose and prospect are not clear,but also a systematic and factual plan has not formed yet.
Since the reform and openness of China in 1970s,the scale of the trade and investment between the countries in Northeast Asian region has increased very rapidly, and following with the trend,the economic cooperation issue inside the Northeast Asian region is proposed.After a series of things as 1997 Asian Financial Crisis happened,the necessities of constructing an economic cooperation in Northeast Asia or even in East Asia is actively discussed.
In other words,in order to cope with the world economic regionalization,cover the defects of the multi-lateral free trade mechanism,ensure the comparative static and dynamic benefit of the integration,introduce the overseas investment,strengthen the capacity of defending the impact from outside,ensure the political stability in the region and construct the connecting relationship for safety and protect,the Northeast Asian countries gradually form a common sensitive band of economic cooperation in Northeast Asia.Under this surrounding,in recent years,the economic cooperation has been discussed at both folk and governmental level in Northeast even in East Asia.
However,the necessities for cooperation existing,the economic cooperation in Northeast Asia has not been promoted rapidly for a variety of factors which include the difference in the economic developing stage,economic scale,technologic level,and the economic and political mechanism between Northeast countries,the resentment brought by historical problems between them,the lack of cooperation in safety and protect.But the Northeast Asian region does have the potential to develop into the center of the world economy,in the region,there is the technology and market in Korea and Japan, the resources in the Far East of Russia,the labor and resources in the Northeast China and North Korea,and so on,the complementarities in the region is really very strong.So, if we can overcome the limitation of the economic cooperation in Northeast Asia, forming the surrounding of politics and economy to some extent,the possibility of implementing the Northeast Asian economic cooperation is very high.
Because of this,this thesis adopts the developing method of international politics and economy which can consider the politics and economy at the same time as the research method,for most of the research before related with Northeast Asian regional cooperation and regional integration are at the economic welfare and effectiveness level, or some level at the political and military strategic levels.However this thesis adopting the developing method of international politics and economy which concludes international politics and international relations,international economy and international trades,and regional economics and industrial economics and so on,through the thinking transferring of the recent cooperation obstacles in Northeast Asia,get to the necessities of concluding CJKFTA.That is to say,this thesis reveals that in order to relieve the stressful relations in the fact of Northeast Asian politics,improve the sense of constructing a community,we must promote CJKFTA,and the FTA will not only make great contribution to the world trade liberalization,at the same time,it will also be a necessary method to process the structure adjustment of the national fragile industries in the three countries.
This thesis based on the theoretic research of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation,at one hand,analyzes the limitation and possibility of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation,which based on the research of the direction and developing status of concluding CJKFTA,analyzes the necessities,priority problems,and the affecting effect to macro economy of CJKFTA.At the other hand,reveals the developing method,promoting direction,style and prospect of the united-market FTA that Northeast Asian area needs.
In short,this thesis summarizes the content of overcoming the obstacle factors in Northeast Asian economic cooperation,and the macro economic affecting effect of CJKFTA,researches the justification of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation, proves that CJKFTA should be the first promoting content in Northeast Asian economic cooperation,which also proves its should-do character,at the same time,proves the rightness of the proposal,which is the research purpose of the thesis.
This thesis is made up of 8 chapters,concluding the introduction and the conclusion.
Chapter 1 is the introduction,which mainly notes the research purpose of the thesis, thesis structure,research methods and research scale,the summary of the research status, and the innovation of the research.
Chapter 2 is based on the theoretic research of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.In Paragraph 1,this thesis first researches the concept and ways of general international economic cooperation,and based on that,tries to get the clear concept and ways for the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.The concept of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation in this thesis takes the concepts for the regionalism of the forming economic cooperation among the Northeast Asian regional area or nations and the economic integration among them as the basis,proposes a theoretic base to Northeast Asian countries in the final overcoming the obstacle of the economic cooperation and forming a strong institutional economic cooperation as EU and NAFTA,pursing each other's benefits and co-exist,and making international surroundings.
Through comparing the integration theories of liberalism and realism,Paragraph 2 gets a theoretic frame of Northeast Asian economic cooperation.In this thesis,regional integration is defined as a political course whose basic content is the cooperation and adjustment of economic policies and whose highest stage is the political integration. Because of this,this thesis puts the research focus on the political level,and researches the economic integration,political integration and the bilateral relationship in these countries.
So,Chapter 2 theoretically notes the should-do character of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.
Chapter 3 combines the regional integration theories discussed before with the Northeast Asian area,through the integration theories of liberalism and realism,analyzes the reasons why the economic cooperation in this area is developing more slowly than the other areas nowadays.It also discusses the forming condition for overcoming the difficulties and implementing the Northeast Asian economic cooperation,through the realist position which is more theoretically persuaded,especially in the aspect of safety and protect based on the non-national capacity which nations are pursuing,if cooperation is the best way to bring out safety and protect,the possibility of cooperation will be authorized,so this thesis measures the possibility through the defensive realist position.
Paragraph 1 does liberalist and realist researches on the reasons why the Northeast Asian economic cooperation is far behind the other area nowadays.On the aspect of the liberalist explanation,it analyzes the stagnation of the regional economic cooperation, the defects of the non-government organizations,and the limitation of the national politics in China,Japan and Korea.On the aspect of the realist explanation,through dividing into the confusion of the safety and protect and the lack of the safety-and-protect community,North and South issue and the Cross-Strait issue,the opposition of the USA and the hegemonic rivalry between China and Japan,and the lack of the leadership processes the analysis.It also discusses and analyzes the heterogeneity of the countries and the historical problems in other explanations.
Paragraph 2 from the position of the defensive realism,believes that the Northeast Asia can overcome the limitation and do the economic cooperation under the forming conditions,and doesn't deny the possibility of cooperation,and processes the research and analysis on the possibility.First,it discusses and analyzes the forming conditions to the Northeast Asian economic cooperation which includes the solution of the safety-and-protect problem and construction of the safety-and-protect community, pursuing open regionalism and leading the USA to participate in,and the cooperation between China and Japan.
Paragraph 3 expands the prospective of the possibility,and analyzes and researches the possibility of implementing the economic cooperative community in Northeast Asian area.It is specifically divided into the styles of regional integration and the stage theory of the Northeast Asian economic integration,informal regionalization of the Northeast Asian economic integration,formal regionalization of the Northeast Asian economic integration,and then processes the analysis.
Chapter 3 notes the limitation and the possibility of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation combined with the theories,and proposes a systematic plan for the possibility of developing the regional economic community in the Northeast Asian area.
Chapter 4 takes CJKFTA as the important economic cooperative community and beginning of the economic cooperation in the Northeast Asian area,and does a comprehensive and systematic research.
Paragraph 1 notes the developing surrounding and the necessities of CJKFTA.The most important point in the surrounding for developing CJKFTA is that all of the three countries should have the common sense that they should cope with the threat brought by the spreading day-by-day world regionalism together.In the necessities,one should be mostly stressed is that CJKFTA will bring the economic benefits to all of the three countries.
Paragraph 2 researches the positions of Korea which can function as a bridge, China which has already developed into the world's new power,Japan which is one of the most advanced countries in the world to CJKFTA,and then gets to the direction of CJKFTA.
Paragraph 3 researches the developing status of CJKFTA,and finds the existing problem which should be solved first.In January,1999,China,Japan and Korea held the 1~(st)summit in Philippine,in November,2007,held the 8~(th)summit.The national strategic research agencies took these contents in the research report,which including deepening the sense of the interdependent relationship in China-Japan-Korea trade,improving the competitiveness of the manufacturing,coping with the agricultural and fisheries subjects together,improving the service industries to the world level,and made a finally agreement that to deliver these content to the head of the three countries.The priority problems in CJKFTA are improving the understanding relationship in society and politics,improving the industrial structure,strengthening the technological cooperation, strengthening the monetary and financial cooperation,the structure of the cooperative committee,and making the region actively,and so on.
In other words,Chapter 4 based on the political and economic relationship among China,Japan and Korea,analyzes the economic and political results will probably be brought by CJKFTA,and discusses the rightness of CJKFTA as the beginning of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.
Chapter 5 is about the pushing direction and developing status of CJKFTA in Northeast Asia.In the precondition of the surrounding of the pushing trend and prospect to FTA all over the world nowadays,the three countries of China,Japan and Korea which are the border countries in Northeast Asia and also the competitive countries in the world market,in recent two or three years,the number of FTAs with other countries and areas is rapidly increasing.Because of this,this thesis researches the pushing direction and developing status of the three countries of China,Japan and Korea which leading the Northeast Asian area respectively.
Paragraph 1 first researches the FTA strategy of China.The FTA concluding order of China is first with the border countries and areas,and developing countries have priority,and the motion of the priority strategy is ensuring the energy resources,forming the regionalism centered with China,and the second motion is other oversea market, promoting the national area development,and increase the competitiveness of the national industries,and so on.
Paragraph 2 first researches the FTA strategy of Japan,the standard for Japan to choose an object country to conclude a FTA is making the favorable international surrounding,ensuring the economic benefits,and putting stress on the possibility of object country's situation and implementation.
Paragraph 3 first researches the FTA strategy of Korea,under promoting the proposal "several FTA being promoted at the same time policy",its political focus is on the advanced economy.
Chapter 5 analyzes and compares the direction and purpose of the three countries' FTA policies,the developing status and direction of the three countries' FTA,and the respective developing results with each other,and then gets the cooperative mechanism of the three countries' conclusion of the FTA indirectly.
Chapter 6 analyzes the affecting results of the macro economy brought by CJKFTA. It takes the research contents made by the common research agencies of the three countries for implementing CJKFTA as the basis,which ensuring the objectivity of the research.
Paragraph 1 researches the mutual relationship between CJKFTA and the computable general equilibrium(CGE).It points out that it is appropriate to research CJKFTA by CEG model,and makes the research of CGE model more specific.And it notes the differences of usage of the CGE models between the research before and research in this thesis.
Paragraph 2 notes the structure of the CGE model based on CJKFTA,that is to say, it notes that the newest data is necessary for the constructive elements of the model, capital accumulation and the service liberalization.
Paragraph 3 notes the CGE applying results in the research analysis of CJKFTA.It reveals a series of the possible developing direction of CJKFTA,and analyzes the affecting results of CJKFTA and the impact on trade.
In a economic scale view,through the objective materials,Chapter 6 analyzes and gets the actual economic benefits to the three countries which occupy the 1/5 world economy brought by CJKFTA,and CJKFTA will have an positive affecting results of macro economy.
Chapter 7 researches and analyzes the pushing direction of the market integration to develop CJKFTA.
Paragraph 1 is to explore the suitable form of market integration to push CJKFTA, discussing from the aspects including the real possibility problems of CJKFTA,the heterogeneity problems of developing CJKFTA,suitable form and the thematic problems of CJKFTA,CJKFTA and non-tariff problems and so on.
Centered with the issues and direction proposed before in several perspectives, Paragraph 2 researches and analyzes the right pushing direction of implementing CJKFTA.Especially from the level of the institutionalizing the mechanist market integration aims at three aspects which including implementing CJKFTA,and institutionalizing the Northeast elements,the position of the enterprises,the benefits of market integration to process the research.And analyze the diplomacy of implementing CJKFTA,safety and protect and market integration aims at the actually benefits brought by the implementing CJKFTA.Especially in the level of market integration,research the market integration and the cultural and institutional developing method,market integration and market economic developing method.At last,from the obstacles for CJKFTA,use the reverse thinking method of implementing CJKFTA to reveal that CJKFTA can be a means to cope with the stress of the political relationship,non-trade regionalist world trade liberalism,and improvement of national fragile industrial structural adjustment.
Chapter 7 is the comprehensive discussion part of the thesis,through the reverse of the thinking position,proposing the difficulties that CJKFTA faces,in order to find a right direction,discussing again from a new view position.
At last,Chapter 8 is the conclusion of the main content and comprehension of the thesis,and proposing policy suggestions.
本论文以东北亚经济合作的理论研究为基础,一方面,分析了东北亚经济合作的局限性与可能性,在考察了东北亚中日韩三国缔结FTA的推进方向和发展现况的基础上,对作为东北亚主要经济合作体的中日韩FTA的必要性、先决问题、宏观经济的波及效果进行了分析。另一方面,揭示了东北亚地区所需要实现的“统一市场的FTA”的开展方法、推进方向、方式和前景。
本论文归纳了克服东北亚经济合作的障碍因素与中日韩FTA的宏观经济效果,研究了东北亚经济合作的正当性,证明了中日韩FTA应当作为东北亚经济合作首要推进内容的当为性,同时证明了该主张的正确性。总而言之,从东北亚各国的安定和市场确保的角度来看,实现中日韩三国FTA是最为适合的方案。
Title:Study on Construction of the China-Japan-Korea FTA
Major:World Economics
Academic Advisor:Professor Xu Wenji
After entering 21~(st)century,under the WTO mechanism and Multilateralism in international order,RTAs concluding is spreading quickly,and FTAs,a kind of RTA, occupy the absolute proportion.Northeast Asian area with the center of China,Japan and Korea,although occupies a great proportion in world economy,comparing with other areas,the integration of the market doesn't get actively promoted.Recently,the discussion about improving the bilateral and multi-literal FTA in Northeast Asia is getting active again,so far,not only its purpose and prospect are not clear,but also a systematic and factual plan has not formed yet.
Since the reform and openness of China in 1970s,the scale of the trade and investment between the countries in Northeast Asian region has increased very rapidly, and following with the trend,the economic cooperation issue inside the Northeast Asian region is proposed.After a series of things as 1997 Asian Financial Crisis happened,the necessities of constructing an economic cooperation in Northeast Asia or even in East Asia is actively discussed.
In other words,in order to cope with the world economic regionalization,cover the defects of the multi-lateral free trade mechanism,ensure the comparative static and dynamic benefit of the integration,introduce the overseas investment,strengthen the capacity of defending the impact from outside,ensure the political stability in the region and construct the connecting relationship for safety and protect,the Northeast Asian countries gradually form a common sensitive band of economic cooperation in Northeast Asia.Under this surrounding,in recent years,the economic cooperation has been discussed at both folk and governmental level in Northeast even in East Asia.
However,the necessities for cooperation existing,the economic cooperation in Northeast Asia has not been promoted rapidly for a variety of factors which include the difference in the economic developing stage,economic scale,technologic level,and the economic and political mechanism between Northeast countries,the resentment brought by historical problems between them,the lack of cooperation in safety and protect.But the Northeast Asian region does have the potential to develop into the center of the world economy,in the region,there is the technology and market in Korea and Japan, the resources in the Far East of Russia,the labor and resources in the Northeast China and North Korea,and so on,the complementarities in the region is really very strong.So, if we can overcome the limitation of the economic cooperation in Northeast Asia, forming the surrounding of politics and economy to some extent,the possibility of implementing the Northeast Asian economic cooperation is very high.
Because of this,this thesis adopts the developing method of international politics and economy which can consider the politics and economy at the same time as the research method,for most of the research before related with Northeast Asian regional cooperation and regional integration are at the economic welfare and effectiveness level, or some level at the political and military strategic levels.However this thesis adopting the developing method of international politics and economy which concludes international politics and international relations,international economy and international trades,and regional economics and industrial economics and so on,through the thinking transferring of the recent cooperation obstacles in Northeast Asia,get to the necessities of concluding CJKFTA.That is to say,this thesis reveals that in order to relieve the stressful relations in the fact of Northeast Asian politics,improve the sense of constructing a community,we must promote CJKFTA,and the FTA will not only make great contribution to the world trade liberalization,at the same time,it will also be a necessary method to process the structure adjustment of the national fragile industries in the three countries.
This thesis based on the theoretic research of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation,at one hand,analyzes the limitation and possibility of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation,which based on the research of the direction and developing status of concluding CJKFTA,analyzes the necessities,priority problems,and the affecting effect to macro economy of CJKFTA.At the other hand,reveals the developing method,promoting direction,style and prospect of the united-market FTA that Northeast Asian area needs.
In short,this thesis summarizes the content of overcoming the obstacle factors in Northeast Asian economic cooperation,and the macro economic affecting effect of CJKFTA,researches the justification of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation, proves that CJKFTA should be the first promoting content in Northeast Asian economic cooperation,which also proves its should-do character,at the same time,proves the rightness of the proposal,which is the research purpose of the thesis.
This thesis is made up of 8 chapters,concluding the introduction and the conclusion.
Chapter 1 is the introduction,which mainly notes the research purpose of the thesis, thesis structure,research methods and research scale,the summary of the research status, and the innovation of the research.
Chapter 2 is based on the theoretic research of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.In Paragraph 1,this thesis first researches the concept and ways of general international economic cooperation,and based on that,tries to get the clear concept and ways for the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.The concept of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation in this thesis takes the concepts for the regionalism of the forming economic cooperation among the Northeast Asian regional area or nations and the economic integration among them as the basis,proposes a theoretic base to Northeast Asian countries in the final overcoming the obstacle of the economic cooperation and forming a strong institutional economic cooperation as EU and NAFTA,pursing each other's benefits and co-exist,and making international surroundings.
Through comparing the integration theories of liberalism and realism,Paragraph 2 gets a theoretic frame of Northeast Asian economic cooperation.In this thesis,regional integration is defined as a political course whose basic content is the cooperation and adjustment of economic policies and whose highest stage is the political integration. Because of this,this thesis puts the research focus on the political level,and researches the economic integration,political integration and the bilateral relationship in these countries.
So,Chapter 2 theoretically notes the should-do character of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.
Chapter 3 combines the regional integration theories discussed before with the Northeast Asian area,through the integration theories of liberalism and realism,analyzes the reasons why the economic cooperation in this area is developing more slowly than the other areas nowadays.It also discusses the forming condition for overcoming the difficulties and implementing the Northeast Asian economic cooperation,through the realist position which is more theoretically persuaded,especially in the aspect of safety and protect based on the non-national capacity which nations are pursuing,if cooperation is the best way to bring out safety and protect,the possibility of cooperation will be authorized,so this thesis measures the possibility through the defensive realist position.
Paragraph 1 does liberalist and realist researches on the reasons why the Northeast Asian economic cooperation is far behind the other area nowadays.On the aspect of the liberalist explanation,it analyzes the stagnation of the regional economic cooperation, the defects of the non-government organizations,and the limitation of the national politics in China,Japan and Korea.On the aspect of the realist explanation,through dividing into the confusion of the safety and protect and the lack of the safety-and-protect community,North and South issue and the Cross-Strait issue,the opposition of the USA and the hegemonic rivalry between China and Japan,and the lack of the leadership processes the analysis.It also discusses and analyzes the heterogeneity of the countries and the historical problems in other explanations.
Paragraph 2 from the position of the defensive realism,believes that the Northeast Asia can overcome the limitation and do the economic cooperation under the forming conditions,and doesn't deny the possibility of cooperation,and processes the research and analysis on the possibility.First,it discusses and analyzes the forming conditions to the Northeast Asian economic cooperation which includes the solution of the safety-and-protect problem and construction of the safety-and-protect community, pursuing open regionalism and leading the USA to participate in,and the cooperation between China and Japan.
Paragraph 3 expands the prospective of the possibility,and analyzes and researches the possibility of implementing the economic cooperative community in Northeast Asian area.It is specifically divided into the styles of regional integration and the stage theory of the Northeast Asian economic integration,informal regionalization of the Northeast Asian economic integration,formal regionalization of the Northeast Asian economic integration,and then processes the analysis.
Chapter 3 notes the limitation and the possibility of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation combined with the theories,and proposes a systematic plan for the possibility of developing the regional economic community in the Northeast Asian area.
Chapter 4 takes CJKFTA as the important economic cooperative community and beginning of the economic cooperation in the Northeast Asian area,and does a comprehensive and systematic research.
Paragraph 1 notes the developing surrounding and the necessities of CJKFTA.The most important point in the surrounding for developing CJKFTA is that all of the three countries should have the common sense that they should cope with the threat brought by the spreading day-by-day world regionalism together.In the necessities,one should be mostly stressed is that CJKFTA will bring the economic benefits to all of the three countries.
Paragraph 2 researches the positions of Korea which can function as a bridge, China which has already developed into the world's new power,Japan which is one of the most advanced countries in the world to CJKFTA,and then gets to the direction of CJKFTA.
Paragraph 3 researches the developing status of CJKFTA,and finds the existing problem which should be solved first.In January,1999,China,Japan and Korea held the 1~(st)summit in Philippine,in November,2007,held the 8~(th)summit.The national strategic research agencies took these contents in the research report,which including deepening the sense of the interdependent relationship in China-Japan-Korea trade,improving the competitiveness of the manufacturing,coping with the agricultural and fisheries subjects together,improving the service industries to the world level,and made a finally agreement that to deliver these content to the head of the three countries.The priority problems in CJKFTA are improving the understanding relationship in society and politics,improving the industrial structure,strengthening the technological cooperation, strengthening the monetary and financial cooperation,the structure of the cooperative committee,and making the region actively,and so on.
In other words,Chapter 4 based on the political and economic relationship among China,Japan and Korea,analyzes the economic and political results will probably be brought by CJKFTA,and discusses the rightness of CJKFTA as the beginning of the Northeast Asian economic cooperation.
Chapter 5 is about the pushing direction and developing status of CJKFTA in Northeast Asia.In the precondition of the surrounding of the pushing trend and prospect to FTA all over the world nowadays,the three countries of China,Japan and Korea which are the border countries in Northeast Asia and also the competitive countries in the world market,in recent two or three years,the number of FTAs with other countries and areas is rapidly increasing.Because of this,this thesis researches the pushing direction and developing status of the three countries of China,Japan and Korea which leading the Northeast Asian area respectively.
Paragraph 1 first researches the FTA strategy of China.The FTA concluding order of China is first with the border countries and areas,and developing countries have priority,and the motion of the priority strategy is ensuring the energy resources,forming the regionalism centered with China,and the second motion is other oversea market, promoting the national area development,and increase the competitiveness of the national industries,and so on.
Paragraph 2 first researches the FTA strategy of Japan,the standard for Japan to choose an object country to conclude a FTA is making the favorable international surrounding,ensuring the economic benefits,and putting stress on the possibility of object country's situation and implementation.
Paragraph 3 first researches the FTA strategy of Korea,under promoting the proposal "several FTA being promoted at the same time policy",its political focus is on the advanced economy.
Chapter 5 analyzes and compares the direction and purpose of the three countries' FTA policies,the developing status and direction of the three countries' FTA,and the respective developing results with each other,and then gets the cooperative mechanism of the three countries' conclusion of the FTA indirectly.
Chapter 6 analyzes the affecting results of the macro economy brought by CJKFTA. It takes the research contents made by the common research agencies of the three countries for implementing CJKFTA as the basis,which ensuring the objectivity of the research.
Paragraph 1 researches the mutual relationship between CJKFTA and the computable general equilibrium(CGE).It points out that it is appropriate to research CJKFTA by CEG model,and makes the research of CGE model more specific.And it notes the differences of usage of the CGE models between the research before and research in this thesis.
Paragraph 2 notes the structure of the CGE model based on CJKFTA,that is to say, it notes that the newest data is necessary for the constructive elements of the model, capital accumulation and the service liberalization.
Paragraph 3 notes the CGE applying results in the research analysis of CJKFTA.It reveals a series of the possible developing direction of CJKFTA,and analyzes the affecting results of CJKFTA and the impact on trade.
In a economic scale view,through the objective materials,Chapter 6 analyzes and gets the actual economic benefits to the three countries which occupy the 1/5 world economy brought by CJKFTA,and CJKFTA will have an positive affecting results of macro economy.
Chapter 7 researches and analyzes the pushing direction of the market integration to develop CJKFTA.
Paragraph 1 is to explore the suitable form of market integration to push CJKFTA, discussing from the aspects including the real possibility problems of CJKFTA,the heterogeneity problems of developing CJKFTA,suitable form and the thematic problems of CJKFTA,CJKFTA and non-tariff problems and so on.
Centered with the issues and direction proposed before in several perspectives, Paragraph 2 researches and analyzes the right pushing direction of implementing CJKFTA.Especially from the level of the institutionalizing the mechanist market integration aims at three aspects which including implementing CJKFTA,and institutionalizing the Northeast elements,the position of the enterprises,the benefits of market integration to process the research.And analyze the diplomacy of implementing CJKFTA,safety and protect and market integration aims at the actually benefits brought by the implementing CJKFTA.Especially in the level of market integration,research the market integration and the cultural and institutional developing method,market integration and market economic developing method.At last,from the obstacles for CJKFTA,use the reverse thinking method of implementing CJKFTA to reveal that CJKFTA can be a means to cope with the stress of the political relationship,non-trade regionalist world trade liberalism,and improvement of national fragile industrial structural adjustment.
Chapter 7 is the comprehensive discussion part of the thesis,through the reverse of the thinking position,proposing the difficulties that CJKFTA faces,in order to find a right direction,discussing again from a new view position.
At last,Chapter 8 is the conclusion of the main content and comprehension of the thesis,and proposing policy suggestions.
引文
1.国务院发展研究中心课题组,“十一五”规划期周我国发现的外部环境与对外开放的战略任务,经济要参,北京,第二阶段期,2005。
2.于培伟,我国参与区域经济合作的原则和策略,经济要参,北京,第二把手7期,2005。
3.徐长文等“建立中日韩自由贸易区全景分析”国际贸易经济合作研究院(编)2002年形势与热点,2002。
4.尹胜炫,东亚模式演化的研究,吉林大学 东北亚研究院,博士学位论文,2007,pp.180-187。
5.国务院发展研究中心课题组。2005。“十一五”规划其间我国反战的外部环境与对外开放的战略任务,经济要参,北京,第26期。
6.刘翔峰.中韩自贸区敏感产业安排的试分析.2007.2007年AMR-KIEP共同研讨会会议文集。
7.于培伟.我国参与区域经济合作的原则和策略,经济要参,北京,第37期。2005。
8.张琦 等.‘如何对待敏感产业:中国已签署自贸区协议对中日韩FTA的启示',国研报告,国务院反战研究中心。2007。
9.郭继丰.中国FTA战略:合作共赢全球均衡.第一经济日报.2005。
10.白当伟 陈漓高。区域贸易协定的非传统收益。外貌经济国际贸易,第8期,北京:中国人民大学书报资料中心,2003。
11.宾建成陈柳钦.世界双边FTA的发展趋势与我国的对策探讨.经济学研究,2005.NO.11。
12.凭雷.均衡战略利益- 北美自由贸易协定的实施及经验。国际贸易,2005。第10期,北京。
13.凭飞.我国实施资源全球化战略的机遇兴挑战。经济要参,2005。第1期,北京。
14.凭赫.推进“引进来”与“走出去”相结合,实施对外开放全面协调发展。 经济要参,2005。第58期,北京。
15.徐雷。全球保护主义阴影下我国纺织业应对贸易壁垒的策略。经济要参,2005。第78期,北京
16.苏盟.CEPA协议签署 零关税开闸服务市场.WTO经济导刊,2005.第11期 总第31期。
17.孙莉.中国-东盟自由贸易区原产地标准及完善研究。河海大学学报,2005。第7卷曲第2期。
18.宋群.东亚经济合作的新发展及我国的对策研究。经济要参,2004。第4期,北京。
19.杨思远.“国际经济”与“世界经济”不一样。世界知识,2004。第1380期,北京
20.温耀庆.区域经济浪潮的兴起及其经济动因分析。国际贸易,2005。第9期,北京。
21.姚战琪.开阔时常与对外投资并重- 贸易摩擦个争端高发期的中国加点出口增长空间。多家贸易,2005。第5期。
22.于培伟。我国参与区域经济合作的原则和策略。经济要参,2005。第37期。
23.刘光溪,陈泰锋。WTO效应:开放促改革、促发展。经济研究参考。2005。第8期,北京。
24.林今淑,中国企业对朝鲜投资的探讨。国际贸易,2005。第10期。
25.刘昌梨.日韩自由贸易区对我国的影响及对策。世界经济,第11期。2001。北京。
26.李霞.世界FTA发展趁势与我国的区域经济合作战略。南方经济,2005。NO.8。
27.张鸿.关于中国对外贸易战略的思考。国际贸易,2005.第9期.北京。
28.赵晋平.从推进FTA起步- 我国参与区域经济合作的新途径。国际贸易,2003,第6期。
29.陈迎春.中国参与区域经济合作的现状,问题与建议。经济研究参考,2004,第1772期,北京。
30.陈柳钦.世界双边自贸区的发展趋势中国的对策探讨.国际问题研究,2005年第6期。
31.李玉潭。东北亚区域经济该论,吉林大学出版社,2001年版。
1.#12
2.#12
3.#12
4.#12
5.#12
6.#12
7.#12
8.#12
9.#12
10.#12
11.#12
12.#12
13.#12
14.#12
15.#12
16.#12
17.#12
18.#12
19.#12
20.#12
21.#12
22.#12
23.#12
24.#12
25.#12
26.#12
27.#12
28.#12
29.#12
30.#12
31.#12
32.#12
33.#12
34.#12
35.#12
36.#12
37.#12
38.#12
39.#12
40.#12
41.#12
42.#12
43.#12
44.#12
45.#12
46.#12
47.#12
48.#12
49.#12
50.#12
51.#12
52.#12
53.#12
54.#12
55.#12
56.#12
57.#12
58.#12
59.#12
60.#12
61.#12
62.#12
63.#12
64.#12
65.#12
66.#12
67.#12
68.#12
69.#12
70.#12
71.#12
72.#12
73.#12
74.#12
75.#12
76.#12
77.#12
78.#12
79.#12
80.#12
81.#12
82.#12
83.#12
84.#12
85.#12
86.#12
87.#12
88.#12
89.#12
90.#12
91.#12
92.#12
93.#12
94.#12
95.#12
96.#12
97.#12
98.#12
1.Abe,K."Estimate of Sectoral Impact of CJK FTA." In Trilateral Joint Research,2003,Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on Strengthening Economic Cooperation among China,Japan and Korea Joint Research on Economic Effects of China,Japan and Korea FTA by Development Research Center of China,National Institute for Research Advancement of Japan,Korea Institute for International Economic Policy of Korea.
2.Ando A.& F.Kimura."The Formation of Production and Distribution Network in East Asia." NBER Working Paper,December 2003,No.10167
3.Andrew Gamble and Anthony Payne,Regionalism and World Order,London:MacMillan Press LTD,1996,pp.248-249.
4.Angang Hu,"Proposition for setting Up Free Trade Agreement(FTA)between China,Hong Kong,Japan and Korea." Peking:Center for China Study of Chinese Academy of Science and Tsinghua University,Unpublished Manuscript,2001.
5.Baldwin,R.E."Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade." NBER Working Paper 3147.Cambridge,Massachusetts:National Bureau of Economic Research,1989.
6.Baldwin,Richard E."Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade." Journal of Political Economy,100,1992,pp.162□174.
7.Baogang He,"East Asian ideas of regionalism:A normative Critique,"Australian Journal of International Affairs 58,New York:Carfax Publishing Company part of the Taylor & Francis Group,2004,pp.105-125.
8.Bayoumi,T.and B.Eichengreen."Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion?Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and EFTA," In T.Ito and A.Krueger eds,Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements,NBER East Asia Seminar on Economics 6,Chicago University Press,1997.
9.Borrus,M."Left for Dead:Asian Production Network and the Rivals of US Electronics." Berkly Roundtable on International Economy,University of Californai,Berkly,1996
10.#12
11.Chang Jae Lee,"East Asian Economic integration:A Northeast Asian Perspective",Tokyo:Presented at The RIETI International Symposium on Asian Economic Integration,2002,p.19.
12.Chang Jae Lee et al."The Economic Effects of a China-Japan-Korea FTA and Implications for the Korean Economy",KIEP,2005,p.48.
13.Charles L.Glaser,"Realists as Optimists:Cooperation as Self-Help,"International Security 19,Cambridge:MIT Press Journals,1994,pp.50-90
14.Cheong,I."Regionalism and Free Trade Agreements in East Asia," Asian Economic Papers,Vol.2 No.2,2003,pp.145□180.
15.Chipman,J.S."A Survey of the Theory of International Trade",Economica,Vol.33,1965,pp.477□519.
16.Cho,Hyun-jun."China's Political-Economic Approach toward FTAs with East Asian Nations and Its Implications for Korea," Journal of International Economic Studies,Vol.8,No.1,2004,p.41.(June)
17.DaJin Peng,"Invisible Linkage:A Regional Perspective of East Asian Political Economy," International Studies Quarterly 46,New York:Blackwell Publishers Inc.,2002,pp.423-447.
18.Deardorff,A.V.and R.M.Stern."International Provision of Trade Services,Trade and Fragmentation," Review of International Economics 9,2001,pp.233□248.
19.DRC,NIRA & KIEP,Joint Report and Policy Recommendation on Strengthening Economic Cooperation among China,Japan and Korea,October 2003.
20.Duncan Snidal,"Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation," American Political Science Review 85,Washington:American Political Science Association,1991,p.722.
21.Frankel,J."Is Japan Creating a Yen Block in East Asia and the Pacific?" In J.Frankel and M.Kahler eds.Regionalism and Rivalry:Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia,Chicago University Press.1993.
22.Frankel,J.Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System,Washington,D.C:Institute for International Economics,1997.
23.Frankel,J.and S.Wei."Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies:Economics and Politics." In J.Frankel eds The Regionalization of the World Economy,Chicago University Press,1998.
24.#12
25.Gaulier G,F.Lemoine,D Unal-Kesenci.China's Intergration in East Asia.Paris:Centre d'Etudes Perspecives et d'Information Internationales(CEOII),2005
26.Hans Morgenthau,Polities Among Nations,5th ed.,New York:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1973,p.167.
27.Hardin,A.and L.Holmes.Services Trade and Foreign Direct Investment,Staff Research Paper,1997,Industry Commission,Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Services.
28.Helen Milner,"International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations:Strengths and Weaknesses," World Polities 44,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1992,p.496.
29.Hoekman,B.and J.F.Francois."Market Access in the Service Sectors,"Manuscript,Tinbergen Institute,1999.
30.Hoekman,B."Assessing the General Agreement on Trade in Services," In Martin,W.and L.A.Winters eds,The Uruguary Round and the Developing Economies,World Bank Discussion Paper No.307,1995.
31.Huff,K.and T.Hertel."Decomposing Welfare Changes in GTAP," GTAP Technical Paper No.05,GTAP,2001.
32.James E.Dougherty and Robert L.Pfaltzgraff Jr.,Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 2nd ed., New York: Harper &Row, 1981, pp. 430-434.
33. Japan and Korea" (Beijing: Center for China Study of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Tsinghua University, Unpublished Manuscript), pp. 1-14.
34. Jeffrey J. Schott, Senior Fellow, and Ben Goodrich, "Economic Integration in Northeast Asia", California: Presented at The KIEP/KEI/CKS Conference on The Challenges of Reconciliation and Reform, 2001, p. 26.
35. Jinwoo Choi, "Trajectory of European Integration and Lessons for Regional Cooperation in East Asia: The Costs of Success," The Korean Journal of International Relations 43, Seoul: The Korean Association of International Studies, 2003, p. 80.
36. Joanne Gowa, "Bipolarity, Multipolarity and Free Trade," American Political Science Review 83, Washington: American Political Science Association, 1989, pp. 1245-1256.
37. Joanne Gowa and Edward D. Mansfield, "Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade," International Organization 58, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 775-805.
38. #12
39. Joseph Grieco, "Realist theory and the problem of International Cooperation: Analysis with an Amended Prisoner's Dilemma Model," The Journal of Politics 50, New York: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 1988, pp. 600-625.
40. Joseph Grieco, "The Relative Gains Problem for International Cooperation," American Political Science Review 87, Washington: American Political Science Association, 1993, pp. 729-743
41. Joseph Grieco, "Anarchy and the Limits of cooperation: A realistic critique of the newest liberal institutionalism," Charles W. Kegley Jr. ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc., 1995, pp. 158-164.
42. Joseph Grieco, "The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union, and the Neo-realist Research Programme," Review of International Studies 21, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 34.
43. Kalirajan, K., McGuire G. Nguyen Hong, D. and M. Shuele. "Restrictiveness of International Trade in Banking Services", In Findlay, C. and T. Warren eds, Impediments to Trade in Services: Measurement and Policy Implications, New York: Routledge, 2000.
44. Kap-Young Jeong and Kwan-Kyoo Choe, "Northeast Asian Economic Regionalism: A Korean View," Global Economic Review 30, London: Routledge, Ltd., 2001, p. 109.
45. Karl W. Deutsch, The Analysis of International Relations, 2nd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1978, p. 198.
46. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1979, p. 105.
47. Kim, Yoon Hyung & Lee, Chang Jae, "Strengthening Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia," KIEP, 2004. p. 158.
48. Krueger, A. O. Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development, Cambridge, M.A. 1978.
49. Krueger, A. O. 「Are Preferential Trading Agreements Trade-Liberalizing or Protectionist?」 , Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1999, pp. 105-124.
50. Lee, J. W. "Capital Goods Imports and Long-Run Growth." Journal of Development Economics 48, 1995, pp. 91 DUO.; "International Trade, Distortions, and Long-Run Economic Growth."
51. Lee, Chang-jae. "Rationale for Enhancing Northeast Asian Economic Cooperation and Some Possible Options,"; In Kim, Yoon Hyung and Chang Jae Lee eds. Strengthening Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia, KIEP, 2004. P. 9.
52. Levine, R. and D. Renelt. "A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions," American Economic Review 82,1992, pp. 942-963.
53. Li Xiang yang, "The Regional Integration in East Asia: A Chinese Perspective", Tokyo: Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 2002, p. 6.
54. Masahiro Kawai, "East Asian Economic Regionalism: Progress and Challenges," Journal of Asian Economics 16, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2005, p. 51.
55. MITI, Regarding the Report of the Subcommittee for Long-Range Issue of the Industrial Structure Council, Japan, 1995.
56. Naoko Munakata, "The Impact of the Rise of China and Regional Economic Integration in Asia: A Japanese Perspective", Washington: Presented at The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2003, pp. 3-6.
57. #12
58. Osamu Watanabe, "Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan-China Business Alliance", Beijing: Presented at The Symposium on Japan-China Business Alliance, 2004, p. 3.
59. Qian Qich en 'Ushering in a New Era of Peace and Development in Northeast Asia' The Proceedings of the 3rd Jeju Peace Forum, 2005. 6.
60. Robert Axelrod and Robert O. Keohane, "Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategy and Institutions," World Politics 38, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985, pp. 232-234.
61. Robert Jervis, "Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation," International Security 24, Cambridge: MIT Press Journals, 1999, pp. 42-63.
62. Robert Keohane, "Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics," Robert Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, pp. 16-24.
63. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, Boston: Little, Brown and Company Inc., 1977, pp. 11-21.
64. Robert O. Keohane, After Hemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984, p. 8.
65. Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1987, pp. 72-80.
66. Sachs, J. D. and A. Warner. "Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1995, pp. 1-118.
67. Sang Hwa Chung, "Wriggling into Regionalism? Political Economy of Free Trade Agreement in Northeast Asia," The Korean Journal of International Relations 43, Seoul: The Korean Association of International Studies, 2003, pp. 94-96.
68.Sampson,t2 and R.Snape."Identifying the Issues in Trade in Services," World Economy 8,1985,pp.171□181.
69.Sauvant,K."The Tradability of Services," In P.A.Messedin and K.Sauvant eds,The Uruguary Round:Services in the World Economy,Washington.D.C.:United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations,1990.
70.Schiff,M.and L.A.Winters."Regional Integration as Diplomacy," The World Bank Economic Review,Vol.12,No.2,1988,p.271.(May)
71.Scollay,Robert and John Gilbert.New Regional Trading Arrangements in Asia Pacific? Washington D.C.:IIE,2001.
72.Shujiro Urata,"Japan,China and South Korea have much to gain from regional partnership accord trilateral economic pact expected to propel both competition and cooperation,infrastructure building to be facilitated and growth spurred",Tokyo:Japan Center for Economic Research,2004,pp.1-5.
73.Shujiro Urata,"Trends in the RTA/FTA Archetecture of the Asia-Pacific Region,",Jeju:Presented at PECC Trade Forum,2005,p.12.
74.Sohn,Chan-Hyun and Jirma Yoon."Korea's FTA Policy:Current Status and Future Prospects," KIEP Discussion Paper 01-10,2001.
75.Tae-Hyung Kim,"South Korea in Peril:Competing Visions and Choices of South Korea Security Policies",The University of Kentucky:a doctoral dissertation,2004,pp.14-19.
76.Takashi Terada,"Constructing an East Asia Concept and Growing Regional Identity:from EAEC to ASEAN+3," The Pacific Review 16,London:Routledge,Ltd.,2003,pp.257-261.
77.Trewin,R.and T.Warren."A Price-Impact Measure of Impediments to Trade in Telecommunication Services," In:C.Findlay and T.Warren eds.Impediments to Trade in Services:Measurement and Policy Implications,New York:Routledge,2001.
78.Trilateral Joint Research."Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on Sectoral Implications of a China-Japan-Korea FTA." Joint Research on Economic Effects of China,Japan and Korea FTA by Development Research Center of China,National Institute for Research Advancement of Japan,Korea Institute for International Economic Policy of Korea,2004.
79.Trilateral Joint Research.「Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on Possibilities and Prospects for a China-Japan-Korea FTA」,Trilateral Joint Research by DRC,NIRA,KIEP,2007.
80.Venables,A."Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries."International Economic Review 37,1996,pp.341□359.
81.Whalley,John."Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade agreements?" In Frankel,Jeffrey A.ed.The Regionalization of the World Economy,The University of Chicago Press,1998,pp.71□72.
82.World Bank.Trade Blocs:A World Bank Policy Research Report,Oxford University Press,2000.
83.World Trade Organization.Regionalism and the World Trading System,1995,P.62.
84.Xie Kang."China-Korea Trade and Investment Development and Free Trade Area(FTA)Prospects," Presented at the International Conference of the Korea Trade Research Association(The Hall Seoul,Korea.October 30-31.2003)
85.#12
1.#12
2.#12
3.小川雄平.環日本海經濟·最前線,日本評論社,1995.
4.外務省經濟國.「日本の經濟連携協定交涉-現状と課題-」,2006.
5.外務省經濟國.「日本の經濟連携協定交涉-現状と課題-」,2008.1
6.外務省經濟國.「日本の經濟連携協定交涉-現状と課題-」,2007.10
7.經濟產業省.「日ASEAN包括的經濟連携(AJCEP)について」,2007.12
8.浦田秀次郎.「急增するFTAの貿易への影響」,日本国際問题研究所「国際問題」,2007,No.566
9.農林水產省.「經濟連携協定(EPA)·自由貿易協定(FTA)をめぐる状況」,2007.12
2.于培伟,我国参与区域经济合作的原则和策略,经济要参,北京,第二把手7期,2005。
3.徐长文等“建立中日韩自由贸易区全景分析”国际贸易经济合作研究院(编)2002年形势与热点,2002。
4.尹胜炫,东亚模式演化的研究,吉林大学 东北亚研究院,博士学位论文,2007,pp.180-187。
5.国务院发展研究中心课题组。2005。“十一五”规划其间我国反战的外部环境与对外开放的战略任务,经济要参,北京,第26期。
6.刘翔峰.中韩自贸区敏感产业安排的试分析.2007.2007年AMR-KIEP共同研讨会会议文集。
7.于培伟.我国参与区域经济合作的原则和策略,经济要参,北京,第37期。2005。
8.张琦 等.‘如何对待敏感产业:中国已签署自贸区协议对中日韩FTA的启示',国研报告,国务院反战研究中心。2007。
9.郭继丰.中国FTA战略:合作共赢全球均衡.第一经济日报.2005。
10.白当伟 陈漓高。区域贸易协定的非传统收益。外貌经济国际贸易,第8期,北京:中国人民大学书报资料中心,2003。
11.宾建成陈柳钦.世界双边FTA的发展趋势与我国的对策探讨.经济学研究,2005.NO.11。
12.凭雷.均衡战略利益- 北美自由贸易协定的实施及经验。国际贸易,2005。第10期,北京。
13.凭飞.我国实施资源全球化战略的机遇兴挑战。经济要参,2005。第1期,北京。
14.凭赫.推进“引进来”与“走出去”相结合,实施对外开放全面协调发展。 经济要参,2005。第58期,北京。
15.徐雷。全球保护主义阴影下我国纺织业应对贸易壁垒的策略。经济要参,2005。第78期,北京
16.苏盟.CEPA协议签署 零关税开闸服务市场.WTO经济导刊,2005.第11期 总第31期。
17.孙莉.中国-东盟自由贸易区原产地标准及完善研究。河海大学学报,2005。第7卷曲第2期。
18.宋群.东亚经济合作的新发展及我国的对策研究。经济要参,2004。第4期,北京。
19.杨思远.“国际经济”与“世界经济”不一样。世界知识,2004。第1380期,北京
20.温耀庆.区域经济浪潮的兴起及其经济动因分析。国际贸易,2005。第9期,北京。
21.姚战琪.开阔时常与对外投资并重- 贸易摩擦个争端高发期的中国加点出口增长空间。多家贸易,2005。第5期。
22.于培伟。我国参与区域经济合作的原则和策略。经济要参,2005。第37期。
23.刘光溪,陈泰锋。WTO效应:开放促改革、促发展。经济研究参考。2005。第8期,北京。
24.林今淑,中国企业对朝鲜投资的探讨。国际贸易,2005。第10期。
25.刘昌梨.日韩自由贸易区对我国的影响及对策。世界经济,第11期。2001。北京。
26.李霞.世界FTA发展趁势与我国的区域经济合作战略。南方经济,2005。NO.8。
27.张鸿.关于中国对外贸易战略的思考。国际贸易,2005.第9期.北京。
28.赵晋平.从推进FTA起步- 我国参与区域经济合作的新途径。国际贸易,2003,第6期。
29.陈迎春.中国参与区域经济合作的现状,问题与建议。经济研究参考,2004,第1772期,北京。
30.陈柳钦.世界双边自贸区的发展趋势中国的对策探讨.国际问题研究,2005年第6期。
31.李玉潭。东北亚区域经济该论,吉林大学出版社,2001年版。
1.#12
2.#12
3.#12
4.#12
5.#12
6.#12
7.#12
8.#12
9.#12
10.#12
11.#12
12.#12
13.#12
14.#12
15.#12
16.#12
17.#12
18.#12
19.#12
20.#12
21.#12
22.#12
23.#12
24.#12
25.#12
26.#12
27.#12
28.#12
29.#12
30.#12
31.#12
32.#12
33.#12
34.#12
35.#12
36.#12
37.#12
38.#12
39.#12
40.#12
41.#12
42.#12
43.#12
44.#12
45.#12
46.#12
47.#12
48.#12
49.#12
50.#12
51.#12
52.#12
53.#12
54.#12
55.#12
56.#12
57.#12
58.#12
59.#12
60.#12
61.#12
62.#12
63.#12
64.#12
65.#12
66.#12
67.#12
68.#12
69.#12
70.#12
71.#12
72.#12
73.#12
74.#12
75.#12
76.#12
77.#12
78.#12
79.#12
80.#12
81.#12
82.#12
83.#12
84.#12
85.#12
86.#12
87.#12
88.#12
89.#12
90.#12
91.#12
92.#12
93.#12
94.#12
95.#12
96.#12
97.#12
98.#12
1.Abe,K."Estimate of Sectoral Impact of CJK FTA." In Trilateral Joint Research,2003,Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on Strengthening Economic Cooperation among China,Japan and Korea Joint Research on Economic Effects of China,Japan and Korea FTA by Development Research Center of China,National Institute for Research Advancement of Japan,Korea Institute for International Economic Policy of Korea.
2.Ando A.& F.Kimura."The Formation of Production and Distribution Network in East Asia." NBER Working Paper,December 2003,No.10167
3.Andrew Gamble and Anthony Payne,Regionalism and World Order,London:MacMillan Press LTD,1996,pp.248-249.
4.Angang Hu,"Proposition for setting Up Free Trade Agreement(FTA)between China,Hong Kong,Japan and Korea." Peking:Center for China Study of Chinese Academy of Science and Tsinghua University,Unpublished Manuscript,2001.
5.Baldwin,R.E."Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade." NBER Working Paper 3147.Cambridge,Massachusetts:National Bureau of Economic Research,1989.
6.Baldwin,Richard E."Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade." Journal of Political Economy,100,1992,pp.162□174.
7.Baogang He,"East Asian ideas of regionalism:A normative Critique,"Australian Journal of International Affairs 58,New York:Carfax Publishing Company part of the Taylor & Francis Group,2004,pp.105-125.
8.Bayoumi,T.and B.Eichengreen."Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion?Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and EFTA," In T.Ito and A.Krueger eds,Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements,NBER East Asia Seminar on Economics 6,Chicago University Press,1997.
9.Borrus,M."Left for Dead:Asian Production Network and the Rivals of US Electronics." Berkly Roundtable on International Economy,University of Californai,Berkly,1996
10.#12
11.Chang Jae Lee,"East Asian Economic integration:A Northeast Asian Perspective",Tokyo:Presented at The RIETI International Symposium on Asian Economic Integration,2002,p.19.
12.Chang Jae Lee et al."The Economic Effects of a China-Japan-Korea FTA and Implications for the Korean Economy",KIEP,2005,p.48.
13.Charles L.Glaser,"Realists as Optimists:Cooperation as Self-Help,"International Security 19,Cambridge:MIT Press Journals,1994,pp.50-90
14.Cheong,I."Regionalism and Free Trade Agreements in East Asia," Asian Economic Papers,Vol.2 No.2,2003,pp.145□180.
15.Chipman,J.S."A Survey of the Theory of International Trade",Economica,Vol.33,1965,pp.477□519.
16.Cho,Hyun-jun."China's Political-Economic Approach toward FTAs with East Asian Nations and Its Implications for Korea," Journal of International Economic Studies,Vol.8,No.1,2004,p.41.(June)
17.DaJin Peng,"Invisible Linkage:A Regional Perspective of East Asian Political Economy," International Studies Quarterly 46,New York:Blackwell Publishers Inc.,2002,pp.423-447.
18.Deardorff,A.V.and R.M.Stern."International Provision of Trade Services,Trade and Fragmentation," Review of International Economics 9,2001,pp.233□248.
19.DRC,NIRA & KIEP,Joint Report and Policy Recommendation on Strengthening Economic Cooperation among China,Japan and Korea,October 2003.
20.Duncan Snidal,"Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation," American Political Science Review 85,Washington:American Political Science Association,1991,p.722.
21.Frankel,J."Is Japan Creating a Yen Block in East Asia and the Pacific?" In J.Frankel and M.Kahler eds.Regionalism and Rivalry:Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia,Chicago University Press.1993.
22.Frankel,J.Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System,Washington,D.C:Institute for International Economics,1997.
23.Frankel,J.and S.Wei."Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies:Economics and Politics." In J.Frankel eds The Regionalization of the World Economy,Chicago University Press,1998.
24.#12
25.Gaulier G,F.Lemoine,D Unal-Kesenci.China's Intergration in East Asia.Paris:Centre d'Etudes Perspecives et d'Information Internationales(CEOII),2005
26.Hans Morgenthau,Polities Among Nations,5th ed.,New York:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1973,p.167.
27.Hardin,A.and L.Holmes.Services Trade and Foreign Direct Investment,Staff Research Paper,1997,Industry Commission,Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Services.
28.Helen Milner,"International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations:Strengths and Weaknesses," World Polities 44,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1992,p.496.
29.Hoekman,B.and J.F.Francois."Market Access in the Service Sectors,"Manuscript,Tinbergen Institute,1999.
30.Hoekman,B."Assessing the General Agreement on Trade in Services," In Martin,W.and L.A.Winters eds,The Uruguary Round and the Developing Economies,World Bank Discussion Paper No.307,1995.
31.Huff,K.and T.Hertel."Decomposing Welfare Changes in GTAP," GTAP Technical Paper No.05,GTAP,2001.
32.James E.Dougherty and Robert L.Pfaltzgraff Jr.,Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 2nd ed., New York: Harper &Row, 1981, pp. 430-434.
33. Japan and Korea" (Beijing: Center for China Study of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Tsinghua University, Unpublished Manuscript), pp. 1-14.
34. Jeffrey J. Schott, Senior Fellow, and Ben Goodrich, "Economic Integration in Northeast Asia", California: Presented at The KIEP/KEI/CKS Conference on The Challenges of Reconciliation and Reform, 2001, p. 26.
35. Jinwoo Choi, "Trajectory of European Integration and Lessons for Regional Cooperation in East Asia: The Costs of Success," The Korean Journal of International Relations 43, Seoul: The Korean Association of International Studies, 2003, p. 80.
36. Joanne Gowa, "Bipolarity, Multipolarity and Free Trade," American Political Science Review 83, Washington: American Political Science Association, 1989, pp. 1245-1256.
37. Joanne Gowa and Edward D. Mansfield, "Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade," International Organization 58, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 775-805.
38. #12
39. Joseph Grieco, "Realist theory and the problem of International Cooperation: Analysis with an Amended Prisoner's Dilemma Model," The Journal of Politics 50, New York: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 1988, pp. 600-625.
40. Joseph Grieco, "The Relative Gains Problem for International Cooperation," American Political Science Review 87, Washington: American Political Science Association, 1993, pp. 729-743
41. Joseph Grieco, "Anarchy and the Limits of cooperation: A realistic critique of the newest liberal institutionalism," Charles W. Kegley Jr. ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc., 1995, pp. 158-164.
42. Joseph Grieco, "The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union, and the Neo-realist Research Programme," Review of International Studies 21, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 34.
43. Kalirajan, K., McGuire G. Nguyen Hong, D. and M. Shuele. "Restrictiveness of International Trade in Banking Services", In Findlay, C. and T. Warren eds, Impediments to Trade in Services: Measurement and Policy Implications, New York: Routledge, 2000.
44. Kap-Young Jeong and Kwan-Kyoo Choe, "Northeast Asian Economic Regionalism: A Korean View," Global Economic Review 30, London: Routledge, Ltd., 2001, p. 109.
45. Karl W. Deutsch, The Analysis of International Relations, 2nd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1978, p. 198.
46. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1979, p. 105.
47. Kim, Yoon Hyung & Lee, Chang Jae, "Strengthening Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia," KIEP, 2004. p. 158.
48. Krueger, A. O. Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development, Cambridge, M.A. 1978.
49. Krueger, A. O. 「Are Preferential Trading Agreements Trade-Liberalizing or Protectionist?」 , Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1999, pp. 105-124.
50. Lee, J. W. "Capital Goods Imports and Long-Run Growth." Journal of Development Economics 48, 1995, pp. 91 DUO.; "International Trade, Distortions, and Long-Run Economic Growth."
51. Lee, Chang-jae. "Rationale for Enhancing Northeast Asian Economic Cooperation and Some Possible Options,"; In Kim, Yoon Hyung and Chang Jae Lee eds. Strengthening Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia, KIEP, 2004. P. 9.
52. Levine, R. and D. Renelt. "A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions," American Economic Review 82,1992, pp. 942-963.
53. Li Xiang yang, "The Regional Integration in East Asia: A Chinese Perspective", Tokyo: Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 2002, p. 6.
54. Masahiro Kawai, "East Asian Economic Regionalism: Progress and Challenges," Journal of Asian Economics 16, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2005, p. 51.
55. MITI, Regarding the Report of the Subcommittee for Long-Range Issue of the Industrial Structure Council, Japan, 1995.
56. Naoko Munakata, "The Impact of the Rise of China and Regional Economic Integration in Asia: A Japanese Perspective", Washington: Presented at The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2003, pp. 3-6.
57. #12
58. Osamu Watanabe, "Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan-China Business Alliance", Beijing: Presented at The Symposium on Japan-China Business Alliance, 2004, p. 3.
59. Qian Qich en 'Ushering in a New Era of Peace and Development in Northeast Asia' The Proceedings of the 3rd Jeju Peace Forum, 2005. 6.
60. Robert Axelrod and Robert O. Keohane, "Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategy and Institutions," World Politics 38, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985, pp. 232-234.
61. Robert Jervis, "Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation," International Security 24, Cambridge: MIT Press Journals, 1999, pp. 42-63.
62. Robert Keohane, "Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics," Robert Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, pp. 16-24.
63. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, Boston: Little, Brown and Company Inc., 1977, pp. 11-21.
64. Robert O. Keohane, After Hemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984, p. 8.
65. Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1987, pp. 72-80.
66. Sachs, J. D. and A. Warner. "Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1995, pp. 1-118.
67. Sang Hwa Chung, "Wriggling into Regionalism? Political Economy of Free Trade Agreement in Northeast Asia," The Korean Journal of International Relations 43, Seoul: The Korean Association of International Studies, 2003, pp. 94-96.
68.Sampson,t2 and R.Snape."Identifying the Issues in Trade in Services," World Economy 8,1985,pp.171□181.
69.Sauvant,K."The Tradability of Services," In P.A.Messedin and K.Sauvant eds,The Uruguary Round:Services in the World Economy,Washington.D.C.:United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations,1990.
70.Schiff,M.and L.A.Winters."Regional Integration as Diplomacy," The World Bank Economic Review,Vol.12,No.2,1988,p.271.(May)
71.Scollay,Robert and John Gilbert.New Regional Trading Arrangements in Asia Pacific? Washington D.C.:IIE,2001.
72.Shujiro Urata,"Japan,China and South Korea have much to gain from regional partnership accord trilateral economic pact expected to propel both competition and cooperation,infrastructure building to be facilitated and growth spurred",Tokyo:Japan Center for Economic Research,2004,pp.1-5.
73.Shujiro Urata,"Trends in the RTA/FTA Archetecture of the Asia-Pacific Region,",Jeju:Presented at PECC Trade Forum,2005,p.12.
74.Sohn,Chan-Hyun and Jirma Yoon."Korea's FTA Policy:Current Status and Future Prospects," KIEP Discussion Paper 01-10,2001.
75.Tae-Hyung Kim,"South Korea in Peril:Competing Visions and Choices of South Korea Security Policies",The University of Kentucky:a doctoral dissertation,2004,pp.14-19.
76.Takashi Terada,"Constructing an East Asia Concept and Growing Regional Identity:from EAEC to ASEAN+3," The Pacific Review 16,London:Routledge,Ltd.,2003,pp.257-261.
77.Trewin,R.and T.Warren."A Price-Impact Measure of Impediments to Trade in Telecommunication Services," In:C.Findlay and T.Warren eds.Impediments to Trade in Services:Measurement and Policy Implications,New York:Routledge,2001.
78.Trilateral Joint Research."Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on Sectoral Implications of a China-Japan-Korea FTA." Joint Research on Economic Effects of China,Japan and Korea FTA by Development Research Center of China,National Institute for Research Advancement of Japan,Korea Institute for International Economic Policy of Korea,2004.
79.Trilateral Joint Research.「Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on Possibilities and Prospects for a China-Japan-Korea FTA」,Trilateral Joint Research by DRC,NIRA,KIEP,2007.
80.Venables,A."Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries."International Economic Review 37,1996,pp.341□359.
81.Whalley,John."Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade agreements?" In Frankel,Jeffrey A.ed.The Regionalization of the World Economy,The University of Chicago Press,1998,pp.71□72.
82.World Bank.Trade Blocs:A World Bank Policy Research Report,Oxford University Press,2000.
83.World Trade Organization.Regionalism and the World Trading System,1995,P.62.
84.Xie Kang."China-Korea Trade and Investment Development and Free Trade Area(FTA)Prospects," Presented at the International Conference of the Korea Trade Research Association(The Hall Seoul,Korea.October 30-31.2003)
85.#12
1.#12
2.#12
3.小川雄平.環日本海經濟·最前線,日本評論社,1995.
4.外務省經濟國.「日本の經濟連携協定交涉-現状と課題-」,2006.
5.外務省經濟國.「日本の經濟連携協定交涉-現状と課題-」,2008.1
6.外務省經濟國.「日本の經濟連携協定交涉-現状と課題-」,2007.10
7.經濟產業省.「日ASEAN包括的經濟連携(AJCEP)について」,2007.12
8.浦田秀次郎.「急增するFTAの貿易への影響」,日本国際問题研究所「国際問題」,2007,No.566
9.農林水產省.「經濟連携協定(EPA)·自由貿易協定(FTA)をめぐる状況」,2007.12