调和阴阳经刺法治疗缺血性中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的
     观察调和阴阳经刺法治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床疗效,评价调和阴阳经刺法、常规针刺法对缺血性中风后痉挛性偏瘫患者的临床痉挛指数、综合功能、四肢运动功能和日常生活能力的影响,并比较两种治疗方案的疗效优劣,探讨调和阴阳经刺法对缺血性中风痉挛性偏瘫的治疗作用及作用机理,为进一步推广应用调和阴阳经刺法提供科学的理论和实践依据。
     方法
     1、病例选择:60例符合诊断标准和纳入标准、发病在2周到半年的缺血性中风后痉挛性瘫痪患者,随机分为调和阴阳经刺法组30例和常规针刺法组30例。两组病例入选时基线资料比较,P>0.05,具有可比性。
     2、基础治疗:两组患者在基础药物给药基础上进行针刺治疗。
     3、治疗方法:
     两组均加用头针:取选患者瘫痪肢体对侧的顶颞前斜线、顶旁1线、顶旁2线,留针。
     (1)调和阴阳经刺法组:体针:上肢:肩髃极泉尺泽曲池内关外关;下肢:血海梁丘阴陵泉阳陵泉悬钟三阴交照海申脉;刺法:针刺患侧肢体,得气后用提插捻转手法补泻,每5-10min行针1次,留针30min。
     上肢的极泉、尺泽、内关和下肢的血海、阴陵泉、三阴交、照海提插捻转得气后,行大指向后,食指向前并上提针的提插捻转泻法;上肢的肩髃、曲池、外关和下肢的阳陵泉、梁丘、悬钟、申脉提插捻转得气后,行大指向前,食指向后并下按针的提插捻转补法。
     随症取穴:口角歪斜加颊车、地仓:语言不利加通里、廉泉、哑门。
     辨证配穴:肝阳上亢加太冲、太溪;风痰阻络加丰隆、合谷;痰热腑实加内庭、丰隆;气虚血瘀加气海、膈俞;阴虚风动加太溪、风池。
     所有穴位均规定具体的针刺方法、针刺深度、针刺角度、行针次数等参数。(2)常规针刺法组:参考第六版《针灸学》教材取穴。
     4、疗程:各组疗程均为28天,各组疗法均为:每日治疗1次,每周5次,休息2天再继续治疗,共治疗4周;常规基础药物治疗28天。
     5、疗效评定:对所有患者均于治疗前、治疗14天后、治疗28天后分别采用临床痉挛指数评分(CSI)、日常生活能力评分量表(ADL. Barthel指数)、四肢简化Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分量表、功能综合评定量表(FCA),分别评定其临床痉挛指数、日常生活能力、运动功能和综合功能,以此评价两种方法的治疗效果。
     结果
     1.临床痉挛指数评分(CSI):治疗前两组病例临床痉挛指数评分比较,差别无统计学意义(P>0.05),经过14天治疗,两组治疗后临床痉挛指数评分分别较治疗前降低,均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。经过28天治疗,两组治疗后临床痉挛指数评分分别较治疗前明显降低,均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组之间比较有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),表明两组在降低患者临床痉挛指数方面,调和阴阳经刺法组优于常规针刺组。
     临床挛指数(CSI)疗效比较,治疗14天后,经x2检验,两组有效率比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但是从总有效率看,调和阴阳经刺法组降低患者临床痉挛指数,改善患者肢体痉挛状态的疗效优于常规针刺组。
     治疗28天后,经x2检验,两组有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),表明调和阴阳经刺法组降低患者临床痉挛指数,改善患者肢体痉挛状态的疗效优于常规针刺组。
     2.日常生活活动能力(ADL):治疗前两组病例日常生活活动能力评分比较差别无统计学意义(P>0.05),经过14天治疗,两组治疗后ADL评分分别较治疗前增高,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组有显著性差异(P<0.05)。经过28天治疗,两组治疗后ADL评分分别较治疗前明显增高,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),表明两组在提高患者日常生活能力方面,调和阴阳经刺法组要优于常规针刺组。
     3.四肢运动功能评分(简化Fugl-Meyer):治疗前两组病例四肢简化Fugl-Meyer评分比较,差别无统计学意义(P>0.05),经过14天治疗,两组治疗后四肢简化Fugl-Meyer评分分别较治疗前增高,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。经过28天治疗,两组治疗四肢简化Fugl-Meyer评分分别较治疗前明显增高,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),表明两组在提高患者四肢运动功能方面,调和阴阳经刺法组要优于常规针刺组。
     4.功能综合评分(FCA):治疗前两组病例功能综合评分比较,差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经过14天治疗,两组治疗后功能综合评分分别较治疗前增高,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组有显著性差异(P<0.05)。经过28天治疗,两组治疗后功能综合评分分别较治疗前明显增高,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。调和阴阳经刺法组和常规针刺组有非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。表明两组在提高患者功能综合评分方面,调和阴阳经刺法组要优于常规针刺组。
     结论
     调和阴阳经刺法在改善中风后痉挛性偏瘫的临床痉挛指数、日常生活活动能力、肢体运动功能、综合功能方面的疗效优于常规针刺组,表明调和阴阳经刺法对于缺血性中风痉挛性偏瘫患者具有良好的效果,能较快地缓解患者肢体痉挛,改善痉挛偏瘫状态,促进肢体运动功能的恢复,提高患者日常生活活动能力,改善其生活质量,加快病情恢复,使患者早日回归家庭、回归社会,具有良好的推广意义。
Objective to observe the therapeutic effect of balance yin-yang acupuncture on the spastic states of stroke patients, to make evaluation and comparison among the methods of balance yin-yang acupuncture, routine acupuncture by clinical spasticity index (CSI). integrated function. limb motor function and activity of daily living. To investigate the efficacy and mechanism of balance yin-yang acupuncture on the spastic states of stroke patients, to provide scientific theoretical and practical to further promote the application of balance yin-yang acupuncture.
     Methods:
     1. Case selection:90cases met the diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria, patients are in the spastic states caused by ischemic stroke from2weeks to half year,90cases were randomized into3treatment groups with30cases in each group, named balance yin-yang needling group, routine acupuncture group. The base-line materials of two groups selected were comparable at fist (P>0.05).
     2. Basic treatment:The patients in two groups applied basic drug treatment which referred to Prevention Guidelines for Cerebral Vascular Disease (Ministry of Health Disease Control Division, Chinese Medical Association Academy of Neurology,2005) to control blood pressure. blood sugar. blood lipid, to give anti-platelet aggregation. nutrition nerve. symptomatic treatment. prevention of complications and so on.
     3. Treat method:All the groups add scalp acupuncture To select points from Anterior oblique line of vertex-temporal (MS6).Lateral Line1of Vertex and Lateral Line2of Vertex on opposite-side of the affected limbs, then retaining the needles.
     (1) The balance yin-yang needling group: Body acupuncture
     Application:Needling the affected limbs, to use reinforcing or reducing method by Lifting-Thrusting or Rotating-Twirling the needles after developing needle sensation. Every5-10min moved the needles, retain30min. To apply reducing method in Jiquan (HT1). Chize(LU5). Neigan (PC6) of upper limbs and Xuehai (SP10). Yinlingquan (SP9) Sanyinjiao(SP6). Zhaohai (KI16) of lower limbs. To apply reinforcing method in Jianyu(LI15). Quchi(LI11). Waiguan(TE5) of upper limbs and Yanglingquan (GB34). Liangqiu (ST34) Xuanzhong(GB39). Shenmai(BL62) of lower limbs
     Selection of Points according to Signs:wry mouth and eyes add the points of Jiache(ST4) and Dicang(ST6); Stiff tongue with poor speech add the points of Yamen(dul5). Lianquan (RN23). Tongli (HT5)
     Point Select Syndrome Differ:Hyperactivity of the Liver-Yang add the points of Taichong(LI3) and Taixi (KI3); Interior Retention of Phlegm Dampness add the points of Fenglong(ST40) Hegu(LI4); Deficiency of Qi and Blood add the points of Qihai (RN6). Geshu(BL17); phlegm-heat and sthenia of fu-organ add the points of Nei ting(ST44) and Penglong (ST40); yin-deficiency and up-stirring syndrome add the points of Taixi (KI4) and Fengchi(GB20).
     All points must follow specific needling methods, needling depth.needling direction.the times of manipulation and so or
     (2) The routine acupuncture group(group C):Reference regular higher education in Traditional Chinese Medicine sixth edition (Acupuncture and Moxibustion) to select the points
     4. Duration of treatment:the course of treatment was28days, each group therapy as follow:daily treatment five times a week to rest two days to continue treatment, a total of4weeks of treatment; a regular basis of drug treatment to28days.
     5. Efficacy evaluation:all patients before treatment,14days and28days after the treatment adapted clinical spasticity index score (CSI), activities of daily living rating scale (ADL, Barthel Index), limbs simplify the Fugl-Meyer Rating Scale for motor function, functional comprehensive assessment (FCA), respectively, to assess its clinical spasticity index, activities of daily living, motor function and function, in order to evaluate the therapeutic effect above three methods of acupuncture.
     Result:
     1. A clinical spasticity score index (CSI):treatment of the first two cases of clinical spasticity index score was no significant difference (P>0.05), clinical spasticity index score after14days of treatment, two groups after treatment were lower than before treatment, There were significant differences (P<0.05). The differences between balance yin-yang needling group with routine acupuncture group were significant (P<0.05). After28days of treatment, two groups clinical spasm index scores was significantly reduced than before treatment, there were significant differences (P<0.05). There are significant differences to compare balance yin-yang needling group with routine acupuncture group (P<0.01). On reducing clinical spasticity score index, yin and yang needling group is much better than routine acupuncture group.
     The clinical efficacy twin index (CSI),14days treatment later, by x2test, two groups there were no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). But from the total efficiency, the balance yin-yang needling group on reducing clinical spasticity index and improving limb spasticity is much more effective than the routine acupuncture group.
     Treatment for28days, three groups the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), indicating that yin-yang needling group to reduce clinical spasticity index to improve limb spasticity in patients with more effective than the routine acupuncture group.
     2. Activities of daily living (ADL):Before the treatment, there are no statistically significant differences to compare the activities of daily living score between the two groups (P>0.05). After14days treatment all the ADL scores of patients in the two groups was increased than before, there was significant difference (P<0.05). The differences between the balance yin-yang group and the routine acupuncture group are significant (P<0.05). After28days of treatment, ADL scores after treatment are significantly higher than before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05). There are significant differences to compare balance yin-yang needling group with routine acupuncture group (P<0.01). On improvement of the patients'daily living skills, balance yin and yang needling group is much better than routine acupuncture group.
     3. Limb motor function score (simplified by Fugl-Meyer):Before the treatment, there are no statistically significant differences to compare the four limbs motor function score between the two groups (P>0.05). After14days treatment, all the Fugl-Meyer scores of patients in the two groups was increased than before, there was significant difference (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the balance yin-yang group and the routine acupuncture group (P>0.05). After28days of treatment, Fugl-Meyer scores after treatment are significantly higher than before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05). There are significant differences to compare balance yin-yang needling group with routine acupuncture group (P<0.01). On improvement of the patients'four limbs motor function, balance yin and yang needling group is much better than routine acupuncture group.
     4. Functional composite score (FCA):Before the treatment, there are no statistically significant differences to compare the functional composite score in three groups (P>0.05). After14days treatment, all the ADL scores of patients in the two groups was increased than before, there are significant differences(P<0.05).The differences between the balance yin-yang group and routine acupuncture group have significant differences (P<0.05). After28days of treatment, the functional composite scores in the two groups are significantly higher than before treatment (P<0.05). There are significant differences to compare balance yin-yang needling group with routine acupuncture group (P<0.01). On improvement of the patients'functional composite score, balance yin and yang needling group is much better than routine acupuncture group.
     Conelus ion:
     The acupuncture method of balance yin-yang has advantage to compare with the routine acupuncture group on improve clinical spasticity score index (CSI). activities of daily living (ADL). four limbs motor function score (simplified by Fugl-Meyer). Functional composite score (FCA). So balance yin-yang acupuncture has good treatment on the spastic states of stroke patients, which would have faster remission the limbs spasticity, improve the state of spastic hemiplegia, promote the recovery of motor function of limbs, improve patients'activities of daily living, improve their quality of life, and accelerate disease recovery, so that patients would early return home, return to society, with the promotion of good significance.
引文
[1]刘美荣,刘伍立.针刺夹脊穴治疗脑卒中痉挛状态的临床研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志.2006-14(6):450-452.
    [2]任占利.中风病诊断与疗效评定标准.北京中医药大学学报,1996:1(19):55
    [3]凌方明,陈景亮,高敏[J]中风后痉挛性瘫痪相关理论及辨证论治探讨.中国中医药信息杂志,2004,11(7):646
    [4]Brown P. Pathophysiology of Spasticity[J]. Neurosurg Psychiatry.1994; 57:7 73-777.
    [5]cHallet M. The neuroPhysiology of dystonia. Arch Neurol,1998,55 (5) 601-3
    [6]EsquenaziA,TalatyM. Gaitanalysis, technology and clinical applications[M]. Brad domR. Physical MediCine and Rehabilitation.2nd ed. PhiladePhia:WB Saunders,2000: 93-108.
    [7]郭民霞,俞世勋.脑卒中患者偏瘫痉挛的康复[J].中国康复医学杂志,2000,15(5):287-288.
    [8]IvanhoeCB, Reistetter TA. SPasticity:the misunderstood Part of the upper moto r neuron syndrome[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2004,83(10 Suppl):S53-59.
    [9]Delisa JA. Rehabilitation Medieine Prineiples and Praetiee[M]. United States o f America,1998:997-1014;1165-1190.
    [10]杨超,谭蔚锋.痉挛状态的口服药物治疗[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志.2003;25(2):122-124.
    [11]李佳,何竟.针灸治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫的概况[J].针灸临床杂志,2008,24(1):47-49.
    [12]王志静,吴敬,任铁生.中风临床流行病学分析[J]中华流行病学杂志,2003,24(1):73-74.
    [13]焦杨,肖清风.补肾祛瘀针法治疗脑卒中痉挛性运动障碍临床观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2009,31(3):20-21
    [14]米建平,张中成,Clinieal Observationon Therapeutie Effeet of Yin-meridian Electroacupuneture in Redueing Museular Tension of Limbs in Apoplectie Hemiplegia [J].Journal of Acupuncture andTuina Seienee,2006,4(3):159-161
    [15]郭泽新,汪润生,等.分部针刺治疗中风偏瘫痉挛68例临床观察[J].中国针灸,1995,5:7-8
    [16]郭泽新,汪润生,等.论偏瘫痉挛与针法[J].河南中医,1996,16(1):48-49
    [17]睢明河.针刺手少阳经穴治疗中风后上臂痉挛的临床观察[J].针刺研究,2001,26(2):131-133
    [18]王子臣,欧阳兆强,指导鲍家铸.深刺腰阳关为主治疗中风下肢痉挛临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2002,21(4):11-12
    [19]郎建英.“靳三针”结合康复疗法治疗缺血性中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床疗效观察[J].广州中医药大学学报,2011,28(4):369-372
    [20]占大权.靳三针配合作业疗法治疗中风后硬瘫的临床疗效观察[D].广州,广州中医药大 学,2009,9-12
    [21]郎建英,庄礼兴,等.靳三针疗法治疗缺血性中风后痉挛性偏瘫临床观察[J].新中医,2011,43(11):93-95
    [22]李湘力,蔡敬宙,江钢辉.舌三针治疗中风失语症30例[J].针灸临床杂志,2009,25(07):6-8
    [23]黄靖宇.巨刺法治疗中风后上肢痉挛性瘫痪45例疗效观察[J].河南中医,2009,29(8):806-807
    [24]陈之罡.巨刺运动疗法对偏瘫患者患侧上肢痉挛的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(12):744.
    [25]于秀梅.巨刺治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪36例[J].实用中医内科杂志,2006.20(5):557.
    [26]温凌洁,俞兰英.巨刺结合刺络拔罐法治疗中风偏瘫98例临床观察[J].江西中医药,2003,34(249):43-44
    [27]石学敏.“醒脑开窍”针刺法治疗中风病9005例临床研究[J].中医药导报,2005,11(1):3-5
    [28]曹辰虹,赵建国.针刺锥体交叉区预防中风偏瘫痉挛状态的临床观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007,5(11):1050-1051
    [29]陈振虎,庄礼兴.经筋刺法对偏瘫痉挛患者运动功能的影响[J].新中医,2010,42(9):94-96
    [30]陈振虎,庄礼兴.经筋刺法治疗中风偏瘫患者肢体痉挛状态60例临床观察[J].广州中医药大学学报,2010,27(5):478-481
    [31]陆彦青,庄礼兴.经筋刺法治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫[J].针灸临床杂志,2007,23(8):1-3
    [32]江钢辉,许辛寅,陈振虎,周昭辉,徐展琼.CT定位围针刺法治疗中风疗效的系统评价[J].针灸临床杂志,2009,25(06):13-15
    [33]赵丽,江钢辉.平衡阴阳法治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床研究[J].新中医,2012,44(3):110-111
    [34]卢佩斯,庄礼兴.阴阳配合刺法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(7):128-131
    [35]娄必丹,刘伍立.泻阴补阳法论治脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪[J].针灸临床杂志,2002,18(12):1-2
    [36]海英,于潇.针刺治疗脑卒中痉挛性运动障碍配穴观察[J].中国针灸,2007,27(10):735-737
    [37]米建平,张中成.阴经电针疗法降低中风偏瘫肢体肌张力疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2003,22(10):7-8
    [38]沈维娜.针刺泻阴法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2010,29(6):364-366
    [39]李佩芳.芒针透刺拮抗肌结合肌张力平衡促通技术治疗卒中后肌力增高的临床研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(8):714-715.
    [40]孙善斌.杨骏.张闻东.等.芒针治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床观察[J].中医药临床杂志,2009,21(3):225-227.
    [41]米建平,张洪来,樊莉,蒙吕荣.透针疗法治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床观察[J].中国针灸,2004,24(1):11-13
    [42]高洁.欧阳八四.恢刺加电针对中风患者痉挛状态缓解的临床观察[J].湖南中医杂志.2007,(6):3-4.
    [43]何晓华.恢刺和关刺法治疗中风后上肢痉挛性瘫痪临床观察[J].中医药杂志,2008,42(12):45-46.
    [44]俞国桥.调督通阳针法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2009,28(10):577-578
    [45]辛昕,李艳明,吴昊明.三种针刺法治疗痉挛性偏瘫的优化方案临床研究[J].陕西中医,2012,33(1):80-82
    [46]孙世晓,武桂娟.滞针兼透刺疗法治疗中风肢体痉挛状态临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(6):37-38
    [47]王丽平,周炜,张树源.头体针治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效评价与研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2007,26(7):3-5
    [48]何圣三.张智龙治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫经验撷菁[J].吉林中医药,2007,27(9):8-9
    [49]李勇, 吴思平. “甲角”穴治疗中风偏瘫上肢手指拘挛的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2001,21(4):211-212
    [50]盛国滨,钱诺,卢凤娟.针刺经筋结点结合推拿治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪的临床观察[J].中国中医药科技,2011,18(3):253
    [51]刘刚.针刺经筋结点结合中频药物导入治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪的临床观察[J].中医药学报,2010,38(3):94-95
    [52]范群.针刺经筋筋节点治疗中风后关节拘挛24例临床观察[J].江苏中医药.2004,25(6):45-46.
    [53]于学平,滕秀英,孟玉泉.经筋刺法治疗中风上肢痉挛状态临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(4):20-22.
    [54]王丽平,周炜,王寅.不同针法治疗脑血管病后痉挛状态的疗效评价[J].中国针灸,2007,27(5):325-328
    [55]王顺,尚艳杰,蔡玉颖,等.针刺拮抗肌运动点治疗中风偏瘫痉孪状态60例的临床观察[J].黑龙江中医药,2007,36(6):44,41.
    [56]熊家轩,陈奕雄,吴思平.针刺拮抗肌群对中风后痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究[J].当代医学,2009,15(19):151-152
    [57]姜桂美,贾超.针刺拮抗肌与主动肌治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的临床疗效观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007,5(9):812-813
    [58]邵中君.针刺配合康复改善偏瘫痉挛状态50例[J].中国科技信息,2011,21:82
    [59]李新红,周君,李先果,等.针刺夹脊穴治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态35例临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(9):7-8.
    [60]刘美荣,刘伍立.针刺夹脊穴治疗脑卒中痉挛状态的临床研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2006,14(6):450-452.
    [61]张闻东,陈幸生,韩为,等.针刺督脉为主治疗中风后肢体痉挛的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,24(5):11-12.
    [62]金泽,王琳晶.针刺夹脊穴治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床观察[J].上海针灸杂,2010,29(6):362-363.
    [63]朱永志,张艳艳.针刺神经干治疗脑梗死偏瘫近期疗效观察[J].中医药学报,2007,35(4):39-40.
    [64]于学平,黄昕,齐欢.电针夹脊穴对中风偏瘫痉挛病人体感诱发电位的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2007,23(11):33-34
    [65]温月贤,黄源鹏.电针夹脊穴治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态的临床研究[J].光明中医,2010,25(10):1858-1859
    [66]于学平,齐欢,黄昕.电针夹脊穴治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂 志,2007,23(10):21-23
    [67]张淑杰,高维滨.电针治疗脑卒中痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究[J].针灸临床志,2006,22(11):36-37
    [68]刘伶俐,刘忠象.电针结合康复治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫[J].针灸临床杂志,2010,26(12):34-35.
    [69]潘永清.透刺加电针治疗脑卒中后肌张力增高44例[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(1):39-40.
    [70]高智颖.电针跷脉穴治疗中风偏瘫下肢肌痉挛状态35例临床观察[J].中医药导报,2007,13(3):53-55.
    [71]潘秋兰,张莉梅,张玉兰.电针缓解脑卒中偏瘫患者痉挛34例体会[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(13):2411-2413.
    [72]吴勇.电针刺激神经干治疗中风偏瘫痉挛期疗效观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2005,27(12):38-39.
    [73]郭小云.电针配合穴位埋线治疗中风后上肢偏瘫肢体痉挛34例[J].湖南中医杂志,2006,22(4):41.
    [74吴敬,李探,王占国.电针治疗中风病足内翻临床观察[J].天津中医药,2006,23(2):137.
    [75]褚瑰翔,易小琴.电针结合康复疗法治疗中风痉挛性瘫痪的临床观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2009,31(8):13-14
    [76]刘伶俐,刘忠象.电针结合康复治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫[J].针灸临床杂志,2012,26(12):34-35
    [77]严伟,霍文嫌,殷建权.针刺配合康复训练缓解中风偏瘫痉挛[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2003,12(4):370-371
    [78]任亚锋.针刺结合康复疗法治疗中风后痉挛的临床研究[J].光明中医,2009,24(7):1313-1315
    [79]金肖青,林馨.针刺结合康复训练治疗中风偏瘫临床观察[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2006,30(6):643-644
    [80]朱凤磊.针刺和低频电针结合康复训练治疗中风痉挛状态临床研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(7):875-876
    [81]丁庆学,邢志强,肖飞.中医综合康复疗法结合现代康复训练对中风偏瘫痉挛状态的临床观察[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2010,8(19):37-39
    [82]秦润笋,赵子龙.中医综合康复疗法治疗中风后肌张力增高疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(11):1456
    [83]郭小云.电针配合穴位埋线治疗中风后上肢偏瘫肢体痉挛34例[J].湖南中医杂志,2006,22(4):41
    [84]吕盼芝,秦鹏涛.中风痉挛性偏瘫的康复[J].国外医学中医中药分册,2002,24(4):256
    [85]谢仁明,陈红霞.中药浸浴及内服结合康复训练治疗中风后肢体痉挛60例[J].山东中医杂志,2011,30(1):18-20
    [86]赵敏,韩群英.针药结合康复训练治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2002,8(6):57-58
    [87]李树亮,周雅静.中医综合疗法治疗中风后肢体痉挛40例疗效观察[J].医学研究与教育,2011,28(3):59-61
    [88]孙善斌,杨骏,等.芒针治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床观察[J].中医药临床杂志,2009,21(3):225-227
    [89]曹银香,白炜玮,冯金萍,吴荣芳.取眼针上焦区、下焦区治疗脑梗塞后手指握力恢复78例[J].陕西中医,200930(2):200-20]1
    [90]许静,李蕾,等.针药结合治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛的临床研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2011,9(11):1402-1403
    [91]焦乃军.针药结合治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究[J].中国医药导报,2006,3(23):139
    [92]赵敏.针药结合治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究[J].河南中医药学刊,2002,17(3):63-65
    [93]盛骥锋,田万青.透穴法治疗中风偏瘫50例疗效观察[J].山西中医,2001,17(1):40-41
    [94]康杰.小针刀治疗中风后肩疼痛疗效分析[J].中国社区医师,2009,11(17):158-159
    [95]黎致宏.腹针治疗中风后痉挛性瘫的临床研究[D].广州,广州中医药大学,2005,9-20
    [96]周炜,王丽平.腹针治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2005,25(11):757-759
    [97]崔海.腹针结合头针治疗中风痉挛性瘫痪30例疗效观察[J].山东中医药大学学报,2010,34(3):226-227
    [98]祝晓忠.腹针治疗中风后肢体肌张力增高的临床研究[J].中国医师杂志,2006,增刊,219
    [199]王国书.俞昌德.颅体针结合治疗中风后痉挛瘫痪35例[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(8):12-13.
    [100]王丽平.头体针治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效评价与研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2007,26(7):3-5
    [101]夏毅.头针结合康复训练治疗中风痉挛性瘫痪的疗效观察[J].光明中医,2011,26(8):1640-1641
    [102]杨诩.头针配合电针治疗脑卒中痉挛性偏瘫124例[J].上海针灸杂志,2012,31(3):171-172
    [103]赵真豪,吴节.“醒脑解痉”针法治疗卒中后痉挛性肌张力增高58例临床随机对照研究[J].四川中医,2007,25(10):113.
    [104]樊素江.头皮针疗法治疗中风偏瘫患者129例[J].中国医药现代远程教育,2010,8(11):204
    [105]高天宇,梅富华,等.对火针治疗脑中风后上肢痉挛疗效的评价[J].内蒙古中医药,2004,23(5):7.
    [106]王永亮.推拿经筋结点结合关节活动治疗中风偏瘫上肢痉挛的临床观察[D].黑龙江:黑龙江中医药大学,2011,28-31
    [107]宫军,张智龙.温灸疗法治疗中风痉挛性瘫痪的临床观察[J].时珍国医国药,2010,21(7):1825-1826
    [108]敖金波,李旭英.温针灸治疗脑卒中痉挛性偏瘫80例疗效观察[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2008,15(7):10-11
    [109]房显辉,周鹏等.温针灸.温针治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2011,27(4):50-51
    [110]盛芳.养血通络汤治疗缺血中风后痉挛性瘫痪血虚络瘀证的临床观察[D].长沙:湖南中医药大学,2011,8-18
    [111]陈景,亮凌等.养阴通痹解痉汤治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪临床研究[J].实用中西医结合临床,2005,5(4):37
    [¨2]柳迎春.加味黄芪桂枝五物汤治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2010,42(5):31-33
    [113]金熙哲.枳实芍药散结合康复训练治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛的研究[D].北京,北京中医药大学,2005,49-62
    [114]张兰坤.从“肝主筋”论治卒中后痉挛性瘫痪验案1则[J].江苏中医药,2012,44(4):45
    [115]孙西庆,温阳熄风化痰法治疗中风病痉挛性偏瘫临床观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2010,8(1):45
    [116]李国辉,刘梅,陈惠.熄风解痉口服液治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫30例疗效观察[J].新中医,2011,43(4):21-23
    [117]黄文,吕伟华等.温经舒筋胶囊治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛的疗效观察[J]山东中医杂志,2011,30(2):91.
    [118]高彦堂,高旭等.瘫康灵内外合治中风偏瘫500例[J].陕西中医,2003,24(2):136.
    [119]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议.各类脑血管病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志.1996;29(6):379-382.
    [120]王永炎.中医内科学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001,7:126
    [121]Brunnstrom. Movement therapy in hemiplegin. A neurophysiological approach. NewYork:Harper and Row Publishers,1970:5
    [122]赵建国.脑梗死[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:331
    [123]娄必丹,刘伍立.泻阴补阳法论治脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪[J].针灸临床杂志,2002,18(12):1.
    [124]白成振.阴阳跷脉与中风[J].实用中西医结合杂志,1994,7(6):345
    [125]黄如训,郭玉璞.脑卒中的分型分期治疗建议草案(全国脑血管病专题研讨会——2000年广州)[J].临床神经病学杂志,2001,14(1):60-62
    [126]卢佩斯,庄礼兴.阴阳配合刺法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫[J].《中国临床康复》,2006,10(7):128-131
    [127]王前新,姜贵云.康复医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:42-43.
    [128]陆彦青.经筋刺法治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫[J].针灸临床杂志,2007,23(8):1-3.
    [129]陈立典,田水胜.针刺治疗中风后偏瘫的新思路及其临床研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,1997,12(2):73-75.
    [130]陈立典,吴强.针刺的现代评价与针刺治疗的研究[J].中国针灸,1996,16(10):1-2.
    [131]赵丽.平衡阴阳法治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态的临床研究[D].广州,广州中医药大学,2007,24
    [132]吴强,陈立典,苏彩平.针刺配合促通技术改善偏瘫下肢功能[J].福建中医学院学报,1997,7(2):36-38.
    [133]郑谅,李艳慧,杨路.调和阴阳法对中风患者血浆降钙素基因相关肽及血管内皮素水平的影响[J].广一州中医药大学学报,2009,26(4):347-350
    [134].廉玉麟;《中国针灸100要穴临床妙用》:内蒙古科学技术出版社:赤峰市。
    [135]石学敏.“醒脑开窍”针刺法治疗脑卒中[J].中国临床康复,2003;7(7):1057-1058.
    [136]龚萍,张明敏,江利明等.针刺三阴交的PET脑功能研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志.2006:26(2):119-122
    [137]Levin MF, Hui Chan CWY. Are Hand stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity[J]. Journal of Nerology.1993; 240:63-71.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700