中学师生信任及相关组织变量研究
|
摘要
中学师生信任是中学组织信任的一个核心组成部分,学校教育的成功很大程度上取决于师生之间能否在相互信任基础上展开良性的互动与对话,因此,它是中学组织内部运作的重要机制,是中学组织事业发展的重要基础与保证,在学校组织中发挥着凝聚人心、激励士气、调谐关系等多方面的重要功能。目前教育界对中学师生信任的关注与研究都很不够,且已有研究在研究视角、研究方法等方面还存在不足。因此,本研究在借鉴已有研究成果的基础上,采用实证方法对中学师生信任及相关组织变量进行了研究,期望对该领域的研究起到一点点推动作用。
笔者采用自编师生信任问卷、师生关系问卷和学校满意度问卷,对广西桂林市、福建福清市和福建莆田市等地7所中学的222名中学教师和341名中学生进行了问卷调查,得出以下研究结论:
(1)自编师生信任问卷、师生关系问卷和学校满意度问卷有较好的信度和效度。师生信任问卷包含四个因子,即人品信任、知识信任、能力信任和情感信任;师生关系问卷包含三个因子,即主动性、深入性和亲密性;学校满意度问卷包含四个因子,即学校整体满意度、工作(学习)满意度、学生(教师)满意度和学校整体满意度。
(2)中学教师的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度总体上均处于中等水平。对学生的人品信任在中学教师师生信任中起着主导作用,而情感信任作用最弱;中学教师认为中学生与自己的关系以亲密性为主,而缺乏深入性。中学教师对自己工作的满意度最高,在其学校满意度中起着主导作用,而对学校管理的满意度最低。
(3)中学教师的师生信任受所教科目、是否担任班主任、初高中、教龄和学校所在地区等背景因素的影响,主要表现为:文科教师对学生的人品信任、能力信任、情感信任和总体信任上均显著或极显著高于理科教师;初中教师对学生的能力信任显著高于高中教师;乡镇中学教师对学生的总体信任显著高于城市和农村中学教师。
(4)中学教师的师生关系受所教科目、是否担任班主任、初高中、教龄和学校所在地区等背景因素的影响,主要表现为:文科教师的师生关系极显著好于理科教师;班主任教师的师生关系极显著好于非班主任教师;初中教师的师生关系极显著好于高中教师; 5-10年教龄教师的师生关系显著好于10年以上教龄的教师;乡镇中学教师的师生关系极显著好于城市和农村中学教师。
(5)中学教师的学校满意度受性别、所教科目、是否担任班主任、初高中、学校所在地区等背景因素的影响。主要表现为:女教师的学校满意度极显著高于男教师;文科教师的学校满意度极显著高于理科教师;班主任教师的学校满意度极显著高于非班主任教师;初中教师的学校满意度极显著高于高中教师;城市和乡镇中学教师的学校满意度显著或极显著高于农村教师。
(6)中学教师师生信任及其四个因子与师生关系、学校满意度之间都有极显著的正相关,且相关程度较高。表明中学教师的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度三者之间关系密切。
(7)中学教师对中学生的知识信任、能力信任、情感信任对其与学生的关系有极显著的预测作用;中学生与教师关系的主动性,深入性,亲密性对其师生信任也有极显著的预测作用。表明中学教师的师生信任与师生关系之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(8)中学教师对中学生人品信任、知识信任、能力信任和情感信任对其学校满意度有着极显著的预测作用;中学教师的学校整体满意度、工作满意度、学生满意度和学校管理满意度对其师生信任也有极显著的预测作用。表明中学教师的学校满意度与师生信任之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(9)中学教师与学生关系的深入性对其学校满意度有极显著的预测作用;中学教师的学校整体满意度、学生满意度和学校管理满意度对其师生关系也有极显著的预测作用。表明中学教师的师生关系深入性与其学校满意度之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(10)中学生的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度总体上均处于中等水平。对教师的人品信任在中学生师生信任中起着主导作用,而能力信任作用最弱;中学生认为教师与自己的关系以主动性为主要,而缺乏深入性;中学生对教师的满意度最高,在其学校满意度中起着主导作用,而对学习满意度最低。
(11)中学生的师生信任水平受年级和学校所在地区等背景因素的影响。主要表现为:初二、高三中学生在对教师的情感信任和总体教师信任上显著高于高二学生;城市中学生对教师的情感信任显著高于乡镇中学生。
(12)中学生的师生关系受到年级的影响,主要表现为:初一、初二、初三、高一和高三学生的师生关系显著好于高二学生。
(13)中学生的学校满意度受到年级的影响,主要表现为:初二学生对学校的满意度显著或极显著高于其他各年级学生。
(14)中学生的师生信任及其四个因子与其师生关系、学校满意度之间都有极显著的正相关,且相关程度较高。表明中学生的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度三者之间的关系密切。
(15)中学生对教师的人品信任、能力信任和情感信任对其师生关系有极显著的预测作用;中学生与教师关系的亲密性、主动性和深入性三个因子对其师生信任有极显著的预测作用。表明中学生的师生信任与师生关系之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(16)中学生对教师的能力信任对其学校满意度有极显著的预测作用;中学生的学习满意度、教师满意度和学校管理满意度对其师生信任有显著或极显著的预测作用。表明中学生的师生信任与学校满意度之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(17)中学教师与学生关系的主动性、深入性对中学生的学校满意度有极显著的预测作用;中学生的学校管理满意度和教师满意度对其师生关系也有显著或极显著预测作用。表明中学生的师生关系与学校满意度之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(18)中学生对教师的总体信任程度极显著高于中学教师对学生的总体信任程度;中学教师与中学生对相互的人品与知识的信任程度较高,但对相互的能力与情感的信任程度比较低;中学教师对师生关系的感受极显著好于中学生对师生关系的感受;中学教师对学校的满意度极显著高于中学生对学校的满意度。
(19)总体上看,中学教师和中学生的师生信任与师生关系之间,师生信任与学校满意度之间,以及师生关系与学校满意度之间均有显著或极显著的相互预测作用。表明师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度是三个联系密切,互为因果的组织变量,本研究对它们之间关系的理解与推测基本上得到了证实。
Trust is occupied an important position in our entire social life. Whether the school education can get succeed depends on the relationship between teacher and students on the base of trust. So trust is the important mechanism in the internal school organization,and it’s the foundation in the development of school ,which plays many important roles .At present, the education circle didn't pay much attention to the level of trust between teachers and students. This thesis carries on researches on the relationship between teachers and students and related variables on the foundation of the existed research results in order to make some progress on this research field .
By adopting self-designed Trust Questionnaire between Teachers and Students, self-designed Relation Questionnaire between Teachers and Students,self-designed Satisfaction Questionnaire in the school, it surveys 341students and 222teachers from seven middle schools in Guilin of Guangxi, Fu Qing and Pu Tian of Fujian in the study and eliciting the following conclusions:
(1)Self-designed Trust Questionnaire between Teachers and Students, self-designed Relation Questionnaire between Teachers and Students and self-designed Satisfaction Questionnaire in the school had good validity and credibility. It includes four factors, namely, moral quality, knowledge, ability and sensibility in the Self-designed Trust Questionnaire between Teachers and Students; and it contains three factors, namely, go-aheadism, depth, intimacy in self-designed Relation Questionnaire between Teachers and Students; and it contains four factors,that is the satisfaction about the overall school, the work (study) and about the students (teachers).
(2)The trust between the teachers and the students is over the middle–level, it plays a leading role for the moral quality of the students in the teachers groups, and it plays a leading role for the trust of teachers’knowledge in the students groups. The level of the teachers and the students in the middle school and the satisfaction about the school is also over the middle-level.
(3)The trust between the teachers and the students of the middle school teachers is affected by the subjects they teach, positions (if it is the head–teacher of the class ),the class they teach ,the age they teach and the areas of urban and rural. Mainly as follows: the trust about the normal quality, ability, sensibility, the overall trust between the teachers and the students of the teachers who teach arts is obvious higher than the teacher who teach science. Only in the trust of knowledge level, the score is gotten by the teachers who teach science is higher than the teachers who teach arts; The score of the trust about the ability of the junior middle school teachers is higher than the senior middle school teachers obviously; In the level of the trust for the students, the teacher who teach in the town has the highest level of trust for the students,the degree of the trust that the teachers who teach in the city for the students is a little higher than the teachers who teach in the countryside, the degree of the trust is the lowest about the rural teachers to the students.
(4)The level of trust between the teachers and the students of the middle school students is affected by their position ,grade, teaching experience and teaching areas. Mainly as following: the raltionsip between liberal arts teachers and students are extremely well comparing to the relationships beweeen students and science teacher; the realtionship between head teacher and students are better than the realtionship between non-head teacher and students; the realationship between middle school teacher and students is better than the raltionship between senior high school teacher and students; the realtionship is better for the teachers of 5-10 years’teaching experience comparing more than10 years teaching experience; the realationship between teacher and students in urban area is better than rurul area.
(5)The satisfactory level of middle school is affected by gender , the teaching subjects, teaching position, grade, and teaching district , which are as following : the female teachers have a higher satisfatcory level comparing to male teachers, the liber art teachers feel more satified than science teachers ; the head teachers are more satisfied to school than non-head teachers; the middle school teachers have a higher satisfactory level than senior middle school teahcers, the teachers in urban or town have a high satisfactory level than rurul teachers.
(6)The trust relationship between middle school teachers and students trust and four factors has a remarkable positive correlation with the relationship between teachers and students, school satisfatory level , which indicates that the trust of teachers and students , the relationship between teachers and students, and school satisfatory level have a close correlation.
(7)The middle school teachers’s trust of knowledge and trust of ability and trust of feelings to middle school students have a remarkable positive forecast to the relationship between teachers and students; the initiative and in-depth and intimacy of relationship between teachers and students have a positive forecast to the trust between teachers and students ,too. It Shows that there is promote positive role to each other between relationship and trust in middle school teachers and students of teacher-student .
(8)The middle school’s trust of Character and trust of Knowledge and trust of ability and trust of feelings to students have a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfaction level of teacher. The satisfaction of overall school and satisfaction of job and satisfaction of student and satisfaction of school management have a positive forecast to the trust between teachers and students too.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between satisfaction level of school and trust in teachers and students.
(9)The depth of relationship between teachers and students of middle school teachers has a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfaction level of teacher. The satisfaction of overall school and satisfaction of student and satisfaction of school management have a positive forecast to the relationship between teachers and students too.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between the Depth of relationship and the school satisfaction level of teacher.
(10) The trust between the teachers and the students is over the middle–level in the middle students, it plays a leading role for the moral quality of the teachers in the students groups, and it plays the weakest role in the ability of teachers in the student groups; the students groups consider the Initiative plays a leading role in relationship between teachers and students,and the depth of relationship is lack too. Middle school students are most satisfied in their teachers, and teachers satisfaction plays a leading role in the satisfaction of middle students, students have the lowest satisfaction in their study.
(11)The trust level between teachers and students in middle school of student is affected by grade, study position, which are as following:the students in grade 2 in middle school and grade 3 in senior middle school have a higher feeling trust level and Overall trust comparing to students of grade 2 in senior middle school;the students of city have a higher feeling trust to teachers comparing to the students of township.
(12)The relationship between teachers and students of students is affected by grade,which is following:the students in grade 1 in middle school and in grade 2 in middle school and grade 3 in middle school and grade 1 in senior middle school and grade 3 in senior middle school have a higher relationship comparing to students in grade 2 in senior middle school.
(13)The school satisfaction level of middle students is affected by grade,which is following: the students in grade 2 in middle school have a higher satisfaction level comparing to other grades.
(14)The trust relationship between middle school teachers and students trust of middle students and four factors has a remarkable positive correlation with the relationship between teachers and students, school satisfatory level , which indicates that the trust of teachers and students , the relationship between teachers and students of students, and school satisfatory level have a close correlation.
(15)The middle school student’s trust of moral quality and trust of ability and trust of feelings to middle school teachers have a remarkable positive forecast to the relationship between teachers and students; Intimate, initiative and the depth of relationship have a remarkable positive forecast to trust between teachers and students.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between relationship and trust of teachers and students.
(16)The middle school student’s trust of ability has a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfatory level of students.The satisfatory level of study and teachers and management have a a remarkable positive forecast to trust between teachers and students.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between trust and school satisfatory level of student.
(17)Initiative and depth of relationship between students and teachers have a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfatory level of students.The satisfatory level of management and satisfatory level of teachers have a remarkable positive forecast to relationship between tanchers and students.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between relationship in teachers and students and school satisfatory level.
(18)The middle school student’s trust to teacher is remarkable higher comparing to the middle teacher’s trust to student. Middle school teachers and middle school students have higer trust on each other's moral quality and knowledge, but have lower trust on each other’s ablity and feelings .
(19)Above all, there are remarkable positive forecast between trust and relationship between middle school teachers and students,trust and school satisfatory level,relationship and school satisfatory level. The results show that trust between teachers and students, teacher-student relationship and school satisfaction are three close contacts with each other and they are reciprocal causation organizations causal variables. This study on the relationship between their understanding and speculation has been basically confirmed.
笔者采用自编师生信任问卷、师生关系问卷和学校满意度问卷,对广西桂林市、福建福清市和福建莆田市等地7所中学的222名中学教师和341名中学生进行了问卷调查,得出以下研究结论:
(1)自编师生信任问卷、师生关系问卷和学校满意度问卷有较好的信度和效度。师生信任问卷包含四个因子,即人品信任、知识信任、能力信任和情感信任;师生关系问卷包含三个因子,即主动性、深入性和亲密性;学校满意度问卷包含四个因子,即学校整体满意度、工作(学习)满意度、学生(教师)满意度和学校整体满意度。
(2)中学教师的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度总体上均处于中等水平。对学生的人品信任在中学教师师生信任中起着主导作用,而情感信任作用最弱;中学教师认为中学生与自己的关系以亲密性为主,而缺乏深入性。中学教师对自己工作的满意度最高,在其学校满意度中起着主导作用,而对学校管理的满意度最低。
(3)中学教师的师生信任受所教科目、是否担任班主任、初高中、教龄和学校所在地区等背景因素的影响,主要表现为:文科教师对学生的人品信任、能力信任、情感信任和总体信任上均显著或极显著高于理科教师;初中教师对学生的能力信任显著高于高中教师;乡镇中学教师对学生的总体信任显著高于城市和农村中学教师。
(4)中学教师的师生关系受所教科目、是否担任班主任、初高中、教龄和学校所在地区等背景因素的影响,主要表现为:文科教师的师生关系极显著好于理科教师;班主任教师的师生关系极显著好于非班主任教师;初中教师的师生关系极显著好于高中教师; 5-10年教龄教师的师生关系显著好于10年以上教龄的教师;乡镇中学教师的师生关系极显著好于城市和农村中学教师。
(5)中学教师的学校满意度受性别、所教科目、是否担任班主任、初高中、学校所在地区等背景因素的影响。主要表现为:女教师的学校满意度极显著高于男教师;文科教师的学校满意度极显著高于理科教师;班主任教师的学校满意度极显著高于非班主任教师;初中教师的学校满意度极显著高于高中教师;城市和乡镇中学教师的学校满意度显著或极显著高于农村教师。
(6)中学教师师生信任及其四个因子与师生关系、学校满意度之间都有极显著的正相关,且相关程度较高。表明中学教师的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度三者之间关系密切。
(7)中学教师对中学生的知识信任、能力信任、情感信任对其与学生的关系有极显著的预测作用;中学生与教师关系的主动性,深入性,亲密性对其师生信任也有极显著的预测作用。表明中学教师的师生信任与师生关系之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(8)中学教师对中学生人品信任、知识信任、能力信任和情感信任对其学校满意度有着极显著的预测作用;中学教师的学校整体满意度、工作满意度、学生满意度和学校管理满意度对其师生信任也有极显著的预测作用。表明中学教师的学校满意度与师生信任之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(9)中学教师与学生关系的深入性对其学校满意度有极显著的预测作用;中学教师的学校整体满意度、学生满意度和学校管理满意度对其师生关系也有极显著的预测作用。表明中学教师的师生关系深入性与其学校满意度之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(10)中学生的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度总体上均处于中等水平。对教师的人品信任在中学生师生信任中起着主导作用,而能力信任作用最弱;中学生认为教师与自己的关系以主动性为主要,而缺乏深入性;中学生对教师的满意度最高,在其学校满意度中起着主导作用,而对学习满意度最低。
(11)中学生的师生信任水平受年级和学校所在地区等背景因素的影响。主要表现为:初二、高三中学生在对教师的情感信任和总体教师信任上显著高于高二学生;城市中学生对教师的情感信任显著高于乡镇中学生。
(12)中学生的师生关系受到年级的影响,主要表现为:初一、初二、初三、高一和高三学生的师生关系显著好于高二学生。
(13)中学生的学校满意度受到年级的影响,主要表现为:初二学生对学校的满意度显著或极显著高于其他各年级学生。
(14)中学生的师生信任及其四个因子与其师生关系、学校满意度之间都有极显著的正相关,且相关程度较高。表明中学生的师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度三者之间的关系密切。
(15)中学生对教师的人品信任、能力信任和情感信任对其师生关系有极显著的预测作用;中学生与教师关系的亲密性、主动性和深入性三个因子对其师生信任有极显著的预测作用。表明中学生的师生信任与师生关系之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(16)中学生对教师的能力信任对其学校满意度有极显著的预测作用;中学生的学习满意度、教师满意度和学校管理满意度对其师生信任有显著或极显著的预测作用。表明中学生的师生信任与学校满意度之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(17)中学教师与学生关系的主动性、深入性对中学生的学校满意度有极显著的预测作用;中学生的学校管理满意度和教师满意度对其师生关系也有显著或极显著预测作用。表明中学生的师生关系与学校满意度之间存在正向的相互促进作用。
(18)中学生对教师的总体信任程度极显著高于中学教师对学生的总体信任程度;中学教师与中学生对相互的人品与知识的信任程度较高,但对相互的能力与情感的信任程度比较低;中学教师对师生关系的感受极显著好于中学生对师生关系的感受;中学教师对学校的满意度极显著高于中学生对学校的满意度。
(19)总体上看,中学教师和中学生的师生信任与师生关系之间,师生信任与学校满意度之间,以及师生关系与学校满意度之间均有显著或极显著的相互预测作用。表明师生信任、师生关系和学校满意度是三个联系密切,互为因果的组织变量,本研究对它们之间关系的理解与推测基本上得到了证实。
Trust is occupied an important position in our entire social life. Whether the school education can get succeed depends on the relationship between teacher and students on the base of trust. So trust is the important mechanism in the internal school organization,and it’s the foundation in the development of school ,which plays many important roles .At present, the education circle didn't pay much attention to the level of trust between teachers and students. This thesis carries on researches on the relationship between teachers and students and related variables on the foundation of the existed research results in order to make some progress on this research field .
By adopting self-designed Trust Questionnaire between Teachers and Students, self-designed Relation Questionnaire between Teachers and Students,self-designed Satisfaction Questionnaire in the school, it surveys 341students and 222teachers from seven middle schools in Guilin of Guangxi, Fu Qing and Pu Tian of Fujian in the study and eliciting the following conclusions:
(1)Self-designed Trust Questionnaire between Teachers and Students, self-designed Relation Questionnaire between Teachers and Students and self-designed Satisfaction Questionnaire in the school had good validity and credibility. It includes four factors, namely, moral quality, knowledge, ability and sensibility in the Self-designed Trust Questionnaire between Teachers and Students; and it contains three factors, namely, go-aheadism, depth, intimacy in self-designed Relation Questionnaire between Teachers and Students; and it contains four factors,that is the satisfaction about the overall school, the work (study) and about the students (teachers).
(2)The trust between the teachers and the students is over the middle–level, it plays a leading role for the moral quality of the students in the teachers groups, and it plays a leading role for the trust of teachers’knowledge in the students groups. The level of the teachers and the students in the middle school and the satisfaction about the school is also over the middle-level.
(3)The trust between the teachers and the students of the middle school teachers is affected by the subjects they teach, positions (if it is the head–teacher of the class ),the class they teach ,the age they teach and the areas of urban and rural. Mainly as follows: the trust about the normal quality, ability, sensibility, the overall trust between the teachers and the students of the teachers who teach arts is obvious higher than the teacher who teach science. Only in the trust of knowledge level, the score is gotten by the teachers who teach science is higher than the teachers who teach arts; The score of the trust about the ability of the junior middle school teachers is higher than the senior middle school teachers obviously; In the level of the trust for the students, the teacher who teach in the town has the highest level of trust for the students,the degree of the trust that the teachers who teach in the city for the students is a little higher than the teachers who teach in the countryside, the degree of the trust is the lowest about the rural teachers to the students.
(4)The level of trust between the teachers and the students of the middle school students is affected by their position ,grade, teaching experience and teaching areas. Mainly as following: the raltionsip between liberal arts teachers and students are extremely well comparing to the relationships beweeen students and science teacher; the realtionship between head teacher and students are better than the realtionship between non-head teacher and students; the realationship between middle school teacher and students is better than the raltionship between senior high school teacher and students; the realtionship is better for the teachers of 5-10 years’teaching experience comparing more than10 years teaching experience; the realationship between teacher and students in urban area is better than rurul area.
(5)The satisfactory level of middle school is affected by gender , the teaching subjects, teaching position, grade, and teaching district , which are as following : the female teachers have a higher satisfatcory level comparing to male teachers, the liber art teachers feel more satified than science teachers ; the head teachers are more satisfied to school than non-head teachers; the middle school teachers have a higher satisfactory level than senior middle school teahcers, the teachers in urban or town have a high satisfactory level than rurul teachers.
(6)The trust relationship between middle school teachers and students trust and four factors has a remarkable positive correlation with the relationship between teachers and students, school satisfatory level , which indicates that the trust of teachers and students , the relationship between teachers and students, and school satisfatory level have a close correlation.
(7)The middle school teachers’s trust of knowledge and trust of ability and trust of feelings to middle school students have a remarkable positive forecast to the relationship between teachers and students; the initiative and in-depth and intimacy of relationship between teachers and students have a positive forecast to the trust between teachers and students ,too. It Shows that there is promote positive role to each other between relationship and trust in middle school teachers and students of teacher-student .
(8)The middle school’s trust of Character and trust of Knowledge and trust of ability and trust of feelings to students have a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfaction level of teacher. The satisfaction of overall school and satisfaction of job and satisfaction of student and satisfaction of school management have a positive forecast to the trust between teachers and students too.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between satisfaction level of school and trust in teachers and students.
(9)The depth of relationship between teachers and students of middle school teachers has a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfaction level of teacher. The satisfaction of overall school and satisfaction of student and satisfaction of school management have a positive forecast to the relationship between teachers and students too.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between the Depth of relationship and the school satisfaction level of teacher.
(10) The trust between the teachers and the students is over the middle–level in the middle students, it plays a leading role for the moral quality of the teachers in the students groups, and it plays the weakest role in the ability of teachers in the student groups; the students groups consider the Initiative plays a leading role in relationship between teachers and students,and the depth of relationship is lack too. Middle school students are most satisfied in their teachers, and teachers satisfaction plays a leading role in the satisfaction of middle students, students have the lowest satisfaction in their study.
(11)The trust level between teachers and students in middle school of student is affected by grade, study position, which are as following:the students in grade 2 in middle school and grade 3 in senior middle school have a higher feeling trust level and Overall trust comparing to students of grade 2 in senior middle school;the students of city have a higher feeling trust to teachers comparing to the students of township.
(12)The relationship between teachers and students of students is affected by grade,which is following:the students in grade 1 in middle school and in grade 2 in middle school and grade 3 in middle school and grade 1 in senior middle school and grade 3 in senior middle school have a higher relationship comparing to students in grade 2 in senior middle school.
(13)The school satisfaction level of middle students is affected by grade,which is following: the students in grade 2 in middle school have a higher satisfaction level comparing to other grades.
(14)The trust relationship between middle school teachers and students trust of middle students and four factors has a remarkable positive correlation with the relationship between teachers and students, school satisfatory level , which indicates that the trust of teachers and students , the relationship between teachers and students of students, and school satisfatory level have a close correlation.
(15)The middle school student’s trust of moral quality and trust of ability and trust of feelings to middle school teachers have a remarkable positive forecast to the relationship between teachers and students; Intimate, initiative and the depth of relationship have a remarkable positive forecast to trust between teachers and students.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between relationship and trust of teachers and students.
(16)The middle school student’s trust of ability has a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfatory level of students.The satisfatory level of study and teachers and management have a a remarkable positive forecast to trust between teachers and students.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between trust and school satisfatory level of student.
(17)Initiative and depth of relationship between students and teachers have a remarkable positive forecast to the school satisfatory level of students.The satisfatory level of management and satisfatory level of teachers have a remarkable positive forecast to relationship between tanchers and students.It shows there is promote positive role to each other between relationship in teachers and students and school satisfatory level.
(18)The middle school student’s trust to teacher is remarkable higher comparing to the middle teacher’s trust to student. Middle school teachers and middle school students have higer trust on each other's moral quality and knowledge, but have lower trust on each other’s ablity and feelings .
(19)Above all, there are remarkable positive forecast between trust and relationship between middle school teachers and students,trust and school satisfatory level,relationship and school satisfatory level. The results show that trust between teachers and students, teacher-student relationship and school satisfaction are three close contacts with each other and they are reciprocal causation organizations causal variables. This study on the relationship between their understanding and speculation has been basically confirmed.
引文
[1]杨中芳.彭泗清. 中国人人际信任的概念化:人际关系的观点.社会学研究. 1999(2), 第 3-23 页
[2]郑也夫,彭泗清.《中国社会中的信任》[M].中国城市出版社,2003. 第 4 页, 第 105 页
[3]岳瑨,田海平.信任研究的学术理路[J].南京社会哲学.2004(6) . 第 19-24 页
[4]周磊.中国在线消费者对在线营销者信任问题的实证研究 [D].上海:复旦大学,2005, 第 13 页
[5]杨再勇.影响中小学教师信任校长的因素及机制研究.[D]苏州:苏州大学,2007, 第 5 页
[6]岳瑨.信任研究的学术理路[J].南京社会科学,2004(6). 第 19-24 页
[7]郑也夫、彭泗清.中国社会中的信任[D],2003.第 105 页
[8]孙五俊.高校师生信任研究[D]. 广西:广西师范大学,2005.第 8 页
[9]岳瑨,田海平.信任研究的学术理路.南京社会科学.2004(6). 第 19-24 页
[10]孙五俊.高校师生信任研究[D],广西师范大学.2005. 第 12 页
[11]孙五俊.高校组织中的师生信任研究[D] .广西师范大学,2005. 第 12 页
[12]吕游.建立和谐的师生关系是做好当代中学教育的基石.潍坊教育学院学报.2006.(3). 第 71-72 页
[13]郄海霞.教师专业发展与教师知识结构.湖南教育.2003(20). 第 12-14 页
[14]夏宜玉.《高等学校教师素质内容的探讨》.武汉科技学院学报.2000 第 3 期,第 94 页
[15]刘冬梅.发达国家高校教师培训的经验及借鉴[J]。河南师范大学学报.2004.2,第 168-171 页 .
[16]刘贤利.师生交往的障碍与排除[J].淮南师专学报(综合版).1999(1),第 63 页.
[17]《马克斯恩格斯全集》第二十卷,人民出版社 1971 年版,第 409 页.
[18]王少华.试论教师人格在师生交往中的教育价值[J].教育研究与实验.2000(4).第 71 页.
[19]联合国教科文组织国际教育发展委员会编著:《从现在到 2000 教育内容发展的全球展望》,教育科学出版社 1997 年版, 第 106 页 .
[20]转引自:孙涛. 浅谈初级中学管理机制[J].舟山师专学报(社科版),1997(2).第 62 页.
[1]. 郑也夫.信任论[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,2001.
[2]. 郑也夫,彭泗清.中国社会中的信任[C].北京:中国城市出版社,2003.
[3]. 郑也夫.信任:合作关系的建立与破坏[C].北京:中国城市出版社,2003.
[4]. 董奇.心理与教育研究方法.北京师范大学出版社.2004.
[5]. [美]D·赫尔雷格尔,J·W·斯洛克姆,R·W·伍德曼,俞文钊,丁彪译.组织行为学(第九版).华东师范大学出版社.2001.
[6]. 苏东水.管理心理学(第三版).复旦大学出版社.1998.
[7]. 周三多主编.管理学——原理与方法(第三版).1999.
[8]. 熊川武.学校管理心理学.华东师范大学出版社.1996.
[9]. 刘先勇,袁长迎,段宝福,周方浩.SPSS10.0 统计分析软件与应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2002.
[10]. 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[11]. 张文彤,闫洁.SPSS 统计分析基础教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[12]. 张文彤.SPSS 统计分析高级教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[13]. 王小英,张明主编.心理测量与心理诊断〔M〕.长春:东北师范大学出版社.2002
[14]. 周明星,王前新,张万兴主编.成功校长全书〔M〕.北京:人民日报出版社.2000.
[15]. 张新平.教育行政组织的发展与创新〔M〕.南京:南京师范大学出版社.2003.
[16]. [美]Roderick M. Kramer & Tom. R. Tyler 编.管兵等译.组织中的信任〔C〕.北京:中国城市出版社.2003.
[1]. 张金花.爱和信任-沟通师生情感的桥梁【J】,湖北教育,2001,(3)
[2]. 崔颖.谈信任[J],北京教育,2002,(9)
[3]. 童建琦.创建新型的师生关系[J],甘肃教育,2006,(8)
[4]. 戈崇胤.创建新型师生关系的理念与途径[J],宁夏教育,2006,(6)
[5]. 苏宝芳.创新视野中的师生关系[J],教育育人,2005,(1-2)
[6]. 王瑾.构建和谐的师生关系[J],山西教育,2006,(5)
[7]. 李升莲.构建新型师生关系【J】,科技咨询导报,2006,(18)
[8]. 关凤艳.关爱 信任 疏导【J】,班主任,2005,(8)
[9]. 刘永胜.关注师生关系的四个细节问题【J】,学校党建与思想教育,2006,(8)
[10]. 吴代新.基础教育课程改革呼唤新型的师生关系【J】,教育探索,2004,(9)
[11]. 甘小明.加强师生心理沟通,构建新型师生关系【J】,湖北教育,2006,(3)
[12]. 张莉.建立良好的师生关系【J】,小学教学参考,2006,(30)
[13]. 孔霞.建立良好师生关系之我见【J】,贵州教育,2005,(13)
[14]. 胡献.建立师生之间的信任胜过许多教育【J】,大学时代(B 版),2006,(6)
[15]. 徐玉娟.建立新型的师生情感关系【J】,吉林教育,2005,(7-8)
[16]. 李世宏.建立新型师生关系的几点思考【J】,安徽教育,2003,(17)
[17]. 陆光玲.良好的师生关系在素质教育实践中的重要作用【J】,黔南民族师范学院学报,2002,(5)
[18]. 刘力平.良好的师生关系的建立是素质教育的关键【J】,北京青年政治学院学报,2001,(6)
[19]. 朱瑞华.浅议个性化教育中师生关系的建设【J】,内蒙古师范学院学报,2004,(1)
[20]. 曾思琴.如何建立良好的师生关系【J】,广东教育,2004,(11)
[21]. 卢丽芳.师生关系刍议【J】,山东教育科研,2000,(10)
[22]. 何薇.师生关系:理想与现实有多远【J】,教育科学研究,2005,(12)
[23]. 兰祥.师生互信 和谐发展【J】,甘肃教育,2005,(6)
[24]. 任晓明.师生互信的现状及改进【J】,班主任之友,2004,(3)
[25]. 俞可.施威厄及其教育信任研究【J】,上海教育,2004,(4)
[26]. 罗华.双向信任-建构新型师生关系的基石【J】,教书育人,2003,(10)
[27]. 朱莉.现代师生关系新论【J】,当代教育科学,2003,(4)
[28]. 余嘉云.新型师生关系:理论与现实之间的发展观【J】,当代教育科学,2005,(16)
[29]. 郭琴.信任【J】,初中生,2005,(35)
[30]. 欧阳长青.教学管理中的信任问题探究【J】,大学教育科学,2006,(6)
[31]. 郑礼平.论高校师生信任问题【J】,长春工业大学学报,2005,(3)
[32]. 李光宗.浅谈如何在教学中构建和谐的师生关系【J】,黔东南民族师范高等专科学校学报,2006,(6)
[33]. 叶敬静.浅议以人为本构建和谐的师生关系【J】,现代农业,2006,(8)
[34]. 熊佳红.学生管理中的谈话技巧初探【J】,恩施职业技术学院学报,2006,(2)
[35]. 袁秋生.学校管理中的教师激励机制【J】,新余高专学报,2006,(6)
[36]. 韩曼茹.中学班主任胜任力的初步研究【J】,教育理论与实践,2006,(2)
[37]. 陈晶.中学教育管理要充分体现以人为本【J】,未来与发展,2005,(5)
[38]. 张宏.中学教育中师生信任问题探索【J】,内江师范学院学报,2005,(1)
[39]. 潘孝福.中学组织气氛与教师工作满意度的相关分析【J】,心理科学,2006,(1)
[40]. 凌辉.中学生人际交往障碍及对策【J】.《湖南教育学院学报》,2000(4)
[41]. 陆小娅、彭泗清.“信任缺失与重建” 【J】.《中国青年报》,1995 年 9 月 26 日
[42]. 俞斌.中学管理改革初探【J】.吴中学刊. 1998(2).
[43]. 傅金福.试论中学教育管理存在的问题及对策【J】.教育研究 .2006(8)
[44]. 王方亮.中小学教师的知识结构与高师课程体系的构建【J】.安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版).2005(3)
[45]. 夏根.浅谈中学教师知识结构极其构建【J】.南通师专学报.1995(9).
[46]. 吰篛?教师专业发展与教师的知识结构【J】.湖南教育.2003(10)
[47]. 王德明.“教学做合一”—教师继续教育的最好形式【J】.人民教育.1997(9).
[48]. 张波.对当前我国中学教师能力素质状况的分析与思考【J】.广东教育学院学报.2000(8).
[49]. 张波.论教师能力结构的构建【J】.教育探索.2007(1)
[50]. 杨海龙.论学生能力结构系统的培养【J】.陕西师范大学体育学院学报.1996(12)
[51]. 吴忠明.试论素质教育观下的学生能力结构【J】.中学数学教学.1998(4)
[52]. 裴跃进. 校本教师培训教师能力目标设定【J】.成人教育.2007(1)
[53]. 朱凤莲.影响师生情感沟通的因素【J】. 河南教育.2007(3)
[54]. 郭淑华.师生情感—学生教育的基础【J】.中国轻工教育.2007(4)
[55]. 余莉琪.浅议教育过程中的师生情感关系【J】.警官教育论坛.2006(2)
[56]. 潘建军.浅谈良好师生情感关系的培养【J】.淮阴师范学院教育科学论坛.2007(4)
[57]. 王丽萍.关于构建良好师生关系的研究【J】.职业圈.2007(23)
[58]. 徐富明.中小学教师工作满意度的研究极其提高对策【J】.教育科学研究.2001(9)
[59]. 夏凌翔.论工作满意度与工作绩效的关系【J】.西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2002(7)
[60]. 曹雪梅.学校应努力提高教师的满意度【J】.上海教育 .2004 (7)
[61]. 赵丽.地方高校教育满意度调查【J】.当代经济.2007(3)
[62]. 陈云英. 教师工作满意度的测量研究【J】.心理科学 .1994(3)
[63]. 曾智.教师工作满意度及其评估意义之研究【J】.南通大学学报(教育科学版).2006(6)
[64]. 俞瑜. 浅析教师工作满意度的影响因素与教师激励【J】.科技信息.2008(2)
[65]. 刘笳.提高高校教师素质的方法与途径【J】.中国建设教育.2006(4)
[66]. Jinsook Cho, The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes, Journal of Retailing, Jan2006, Vol 82,Issue 1.
[67]. Entwisle, Doris R, Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement, American Journal of Sociology, Nov2003, Vol.109,Issue 3.
[68]. Schorr,Jonathan.A Trust Betrayed[J].Teacher Magazine,1996,(5)
[1]. 沈淼.组织管理诚信及现代价值初探[D],苏州大学硕士学位论文,2004,(4)
[2]. 陈盼.社会信任的构建:一种非盈利组织的视角[D],武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005,(5)
[3]. 宾建光.试论我国当前社会转型中的信任缺失与信任重建[D],广西师范大学硕士学位论文,2001.(4)
[4]. 白春阳.现代社会信任问题研究[D],中国人民大学博士学位论文,2006,(5)
[5]. 孙永平.信任问题的经济学研究[D],武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005,(5)
[6]. 唐建生.组织内部知识共享的若干问题研究[D],天津大学硕士学位论文,2004,(12)
[7]. 范立华.中等师范学校师生关系研究[D],西北师范大学硕士学位论文,2003,(5)
[8]. 李宁.不同组织信任背景下创业导向与组织绩效关系研究[D],浙江大学硕士学位论文,2005,(12)
[9]. 孙五俊.高校组织中师生信任研究[D],广西师范大学硕士学位论文,2005,(4)
[10]. 胡君霞.论创新教育中新型师生关系的特征与构建[D],华中师范大学硕士学位论文,2002
[11]. 范庭卫. 教学过程理论研究[D],苏州大学硕士学位论文,2003
[12]. 蒋娇.中学教师工作满意度的主要影响因素及其个别差异研究[D].南京师范大学硕士学位论文.2006
[13]. 聂朝菊.中学生人际冲突产生的原因及冲突处理策略的研究[D].西南大学教师硕士学位论文.2006
[14]. 宫火良. 河南省高中教师工作满意度现状的研究[D].河南大学硕士学位论文.2002
[15]. 项丽萍.高中教师工作满意度研究[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文.2006
[16]. 牟嫣 .工作满意度和组织承诺关系的实证研究[D].华中农业大学硕士学位论文 .2006
[17]. 谢绚丽.论社会信任结构与社会整合[D].浙江师范大学硕士学位论文.2004
[18]. 梁文艳.领导信任的结构及相关变量的实证研究[D].暨南大学硕士学位论文 .2007
[19]. 方士敏.信任问题的社会学研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学硕士学位论文.2006
[20]. 李时敏.信任基本问题研究[D].东北财经大学硕士学位论文.2003
[21]. 赵娟.中学教师组织信任和知识分享意愿的关系研究[D]. 华南师范大学硕士学位论文.2007
[22]. 刘广彬.经济交易中的信任问题研究[D].东北财经大学硕士学位论文 .2005
[23]. 奉美凤 .中小学教师的工作满意度与组织承诺对其离职倾向的影响研究[D].华南师范大学硕士学位论文 .2007
[24]. 高岚.中学教师职业倦怠现状极其影响因素研究[D].河北师范大学硕士学位论文.2006
[25]. 陈剑梅.中学教师素质结构及现状评价[D].苏州大学硕士学位论文.2006
[26]. 王睿 .中学教师的职业倦怠状况[D].南京师范大学硕士学位论文.2006
[27]. 何伟.中学教师工作满意感的个案调查[D].华东师范大学硕士学位论文.2002
[28]. 赵红梅.关于农村中学教师专业化发展的思考[D].山东师范大学教育硕士学位论文.2006
[29]. 郭志鸿.中学教师管理的现状及思考[D].华中师范大学硕士学位论文 .2004
[2]郑也夫,彭泗清.《中国社会中的信任》[M].中国城市出版社,2003. 第 4 页, 第 105 页
[3]岳瑨,田海平.信任研究的学术理路[J].南京社会哲学.2004(6) . 第 19-24 页
[4]周磊.中国在线消费者对在线营销者信任问题的实证研究 [D].上海:复旦大学,2005, 第 13 页
[5]杨再勇.影响中小学教师信任校长的因素及机制研究.[D]苏州:苏州大学,2007, 第 5 页
[6]岳瑨.信任研究的学术理路[J].南京社会科学,2004(6). 第 19-24 页
[7]郑也夫、彭泗清.中国社会中的信任[D],2003.第 105 页
[8]孙五俊.高校师生信任研究[D]. 广西:广西师范大学,2005.第 8 页
[9]岳瑨,田海平.信任研究的学术理路.南京社会科学.2004(6). 第 19-24 页
[10]孙五俊.高校师生信任研究[D],广西师范大学.2005. 第 12 页
[11]孙五俊.高校组织中的师生信任研究[D] .广西师范大学,2005. 第 12 页
[12]吕游.建立和谐的师生关系是做好当代中学教育的基石.潍坊教育学院学报.2006.(3). 第 71-72 页
[13]郄海霞.教师专业发展与教师知识结构.湖南教育.2003(20). 第 12-14 页
[14]夏宜玉.《高等学校教师素质内容的探讨》.武汉科技学院学报.2000 第 3 期,第 94 页
[15]刘冬梅.发达国家高校教师培训的经验及借鉴[J]。河南师范大学学报.2004.2,第 168-171 页 .
[16]刘贤利.师生交往的障碍与排除[J].淮南师专学报(综合版).1999(1),第 63 页.
[17]《马克斯恩格斯全集》第二十卷,人民出版社 1971 年版,第 409 页.
[18]王少华.试论教师人格在师生交往中的教育价值[J].教育研究与实验.2000(4).第 71 页.
[19]联合国教科文组织国际教育发展委员会编著:《从现在到 2000 教育内容发展的全球展望》,教育科学出版社 1997 年版, 第 106 页 .
[20]转引自:孙涛. 浅谈初级中学管理机制[J].舟山师专学报(社科版),1997(2).第 62 页.
[1]. 郑也夫.信任论[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,2001.
[2]. 郑也夫,彭泗清.中国社会中的信任[C].北京:中国城市出版社,2003.
[3]. 郑也夫.信任:合作关系的建立与破坏[C].北京:中国城市出版社,2003.
[4]. 董奇.心理与教育研究方法.北京师范大学出版社.2004.
[5]. [美]D·赫尔雷格尔,J·W·斯洛克姆,R·W·伍德曼,俞文钊,丁彪译.组织行为学(第九版).华东师范大学出版社.2001.
[6]. 苏东水.管理心理学(第三版).复旦大学出版社.1998.
[7]. 周三多主编.管理学——原理与方法(第三版).1999.
[8]. 熊川武.学校管理心理学.华东师范大学出版社.1996.
[9]. 刘先勇,袁长迎,段宝福,周方浩.SPSS10.0 统计分析软件与应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2002.
[10]. 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[11]. 张文彤,闫洁.SPSS 统计分析基础教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[12]. 张文彤.SPSS 统计分析高级教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[13]. 王小英,张明主编.心理测量与心理诊断〔M〕.长春:东北师范大学出版社.2002
[14]. 周明星,王前新,张万兴主编.成功校长全书〔M〕.北京:人民日报出版社.2000.
[15]. 张新平.教育行政组织的发展与创新〔M〕.南京:南京师范大学出版社.2003.
[16]. [美]Roderick M. Kramer & Tom. R. Tyler 编.管兵等译.组织中的信任〔C〕.北京:中国城市出版社.2003.
[1]. 张金花.爱和信任-沟通师生情感的桥梁【J】,湖北教育,2001,(3)
[2]. 崔颖.谈信任[J],北京教育,2002,(9)
[3]. 童建琦.创建新型的师生关系[J],甘肃教育,2006,(8)
[4]. 戈崇胤.创建新型师生关系的理念与途径[J],宁夏教育,2006,(6)
[5]. 苏宝芳.创新视野中的师生关系[J],教育育人,2005,(1-2)
[6]. 王瑾.构建和谐的师生关系[J],山西教育,2006,(5)
[7]. 李升莲.构建新型师生关系【J】,科技咨询导报,2006,(18)
[8]. 关凤艳.关爱 信任 疏导【J】,班主任,2005,(8)
[9]. 刘永胜.关注师生关系的四个细节问题【J】,学校党建与思想教育,2006,(8)
[10]. 吴代新.基础教育课程改革呼唤新型的师生关系【J】,教育探索,2004,(9)
[11]. 甘小明.加强师生心理沟通,构建新型师生关系【J】,湖北教育,2006,(3)
[12]. 张莉.建立良好的师生关系【J】,小学教学参考,2006,(30)
[13]. 孔霞.建立良好师生关系之我见【J】,贵州教育,2005,(13)
[14]. 胡献.建立师生之间的信任胜过许多教育【J】,大学时代(B 版),2006,(6)
[15]. 徐玉娟.建立新型的师生情感关系【J】,吉林教育,2005,(7-8)
[16]. 李世宏.建立新型师生关系的几点思考【J】,安徽教育,2003,(17)
[17]. 陆光玲.良好的师生关系在素质教育实践中的重要作用【J】,黔南民族师范学院学报,2002,(5)
[18]. 刘力平.良好的师生关系的建立是素质教育的关键【J】,北京青年政治学院学报,2001,(6)
[19]. 朱瑞华.浅议个性化教育中师生关系的建设【J】,内蒙古师范学院学报,2004,(1)
[20]. 曾思琴.如何建立良好的师生关系【J】,广东教育,2004,(11)
[21]. 卢丽芳.师生关系刍议【J】,山东教育科研,2000,(10)
[22]. 何薇.师生关系:理想与现实有多远【J】,教育科学研究,2005,(12)
[23]. 兰祥.师生互信 和谐发展【J】,甘肃教育,2005,(6)
[24]. 任晓明.师生互信的现状及改进【J】,班主任之友,2004,(3)
[25]. 俞可.施威厄及其教育信任研究【J】,上海教育,2004,(4)
[26]. 罗华.双向信任-建构新型师生关系的基石【J】,教书育人,2003,(10)
[27]. 朱莉.现代师生关系新论【J】,当代教育科学,2003,(4)
[28]. 余嘉云.新型师生关系:理论与现实之间的发展观【J】,当代教育科学,2005,(16)
[29]. 郭琴.信任【J】,初中生,2005,(35)
[30]. 欧阳长青.教学管理中的信任问题探究【J】,大学教育科学,2006,(6)
[31]. 郑礼平.论高校师生信任问题【J】,长春工业大学学报,2005,(3)
[32]. 李光宗.浅谈如何在教学中构建和谐的师生关系【J】,黔东南民族师范高等专科学校学报,2006,(6)
[33]. 叶敬静.浅议以人为本构建和谐的师生关系【J】,现代农业,2006,(8)
[34]. 熊佳红.学生管理中的谈话技巧初探【J】,恩施职业技术学院学报,2006,(2)
[35]. 袁秋生.学校管理中的教师激励机制【J】,新余高专学报,2006,(6)
[36]. 韩曼茹.中学班主任胜任力的初步研究【J】,教育理论与实践,2006,(2)
[37]. 陈晶.中学教育管理要充分体现以人为本【J】,未来与发展,2005,(5)
[38]. 张宏.中学教育中师生信任问题探索【J】,内江师范学院学报,2005,(1)
[39]. 潘孝福.中学组织气氛与教师工作满意度的相关分析【J】,心理科学,2006,(1)
[40]. 凌辉.中学生人际交往障碍及对策【J】.《湖南教育学院学报》,2000(4)
[41]. 陆小娅、彭泗清.“信任缺失与重建” 【J】.《中国青年报》,1995 年 9 月 26 日
[42]. 俞斌.中学管理改革初探【J】.吴中学刊. 1998(2).
[43]. 傅金福.试论中学教育管理存在的问题及对策【J】.教育研究 .2006(8)
[44]. 王方亮.中小学教师的知识结构与高师课程体系的构建【J】.安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版).2005(3)
[45]. 夏根.浅谈中学教师知识结构极其构建【J】.南通师专学报.1995(9).
[46]. 吰篛?教师专业发展与教师的知识结构【J】.湖南教育.2003(10)
[47]. 王德明.“教学做合一”—教师继续教育的最好形式【J】.人民教育.1997(9).
[48]. 张波.对当前我国中学教师能力素质状况的分析与思考【J】.广东教育学院学报.2000(8).
[49]. 张波.论教师能力结构的构建【J】.教育探索.2007(1)
[50]. 杨海龙.论学生能力结构系统的培养【J】.陕西师范大学体育学院学报.1996(12)
[51]. 吴忠明.试论素质教育观下的学生能力结构【J】.中学数学教学.1998(4)
[52]. 裴跃进. 校本教师培训教师能力目标设定【J】.成人教育.2007(1)
[53]. 朱凤莲.影响师生情感沟通的因素【J】. 河南教育.2007(3)
[54]. 郭淑华.师生情感—学生教育的基础【J】.中国轻工教育.2007(4)
[55]. 余莉琪.浅议教育过程中的师生情感关系【J】.警官教育论坛.2006(2)
[56]. 潘建军.浅谈良好师生情感关系的培养【J】.淮阴师范学院教育科学论坛.2007(4)
[57]. 王丽萍.关于构建良好师生关系的研究【J】.职业圈.2007(23)
[58]. 徐富明.中小学教师工作满意度的研究极其提高对策【J】.教育科学研究.2001(9)
[59]. 夏凌翔.论工作满意度与工作绩效的关系【J】.西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2002(7)
[60]. 曹雪梅.学校应努力提高教师的满意度【J】.上海教育 .2004 (7)
[61]. 赵丽.地方高校教育满意度调查【J】.当代经济.2007(3)
[62]. 陈云英. 教师工作满意度的测量研究【J】.心理科学 .1994(3)
[63]. 曾智.教师工作满意度及其评估意义之研究【J】.南通大学学报(教育科学版).2006(6)
[64]. 俞瑜. 浅析教师工作满意度的影响因素与教师激励【J】.科技信息.2008(2)
[65]. 刘笳.提高高校教师素质的方法与途径【J】.中国建设教育.2006(4)
[66]. Jinsook Cho, The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes, Journal of Retailing, Jan2006, Vol 82,Issue 1.
[67]. Entwisle, Doris R, Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement, American Journal of Sociology, Nov2003, Vol.109,Issue 3.
[68]. Schorr,Jonathan.A Trust Betrayed[J].Teacher Magazine,1996,(5)
[1]. 沈淼.组织管理诚信及现代价值初探[D],苏州大学硕士学位论文,2004,(4)
[2]. 陈盼.社会信任的构建:一种非盈利组织的视角[D],武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005,(5)
[3]. 宾建光.试论我国当前社会转型中的信任缺失与信任重建[D],广西师范大学硕士学位论文,2001.(4)
[4]. 白春阳.现代社会信任问题研究[D],中国人民大学博士学位论文,2006,(5)
[5]. 孙永平.信任问题的经济学研究[D],武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005,(5)
[6]. 唐建生.组织内部知识共享的若干问题研究[D],天津大学硕士学位论文,2004,(12)
[7]. 范立华.中等师范学校师生关系研究[D],西北师范大学硕士学位论文,2003,(5)
[8]. 李宁.不同组织信任背景下创业导向与组织绩效关系研究[D],浙江大学硕士学位论文,2005,(12)
[9]. 孙五俊.高校组织中师生信任研究[D],广西师范大学硕士学位论文,2005,(4)
[10]. 胡君霞.论创新教育中新型师生关系的特征与构建[D],华中师范大学硕士学位论文,2002
[11]. 范庭卫. 教学过程理论研究[D],苏州大学硕士学位论文,2003
[12]. 蒋娇.中学教师工作满意度的主要影响因素及其个别差异研究[D].南京师范大学硕士学位论文.2006
[13]. 聂朝菊.中学生人际冲突产生的原因及冲突处理策略的研究[D].西南大学教师硕士学位论文.2006
[14]. 宫火良. 河南省高中教师工作满意度现状的研究[D].河南大学硕士学位论文.2002
[15]. 项丽萍.高中教师工作满意度研究[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文.2006
[16]. 牟嫣 .工作满意度和组织承诺关系的实证研究[D].华中农业大学硕士学位论文 .2006
[17]. 谢绚丽.论社会信任结构与社会整合[D].浙江师范大学硕士学位论文.2004
[18]. 梁文艳.领导信任的结构及相关变量的实证研究[D].暨南大学硕士学位论文 .2007
[19]. 方士敏.信任问题的社会学研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学硕士学位论文.2006
[20]. 李时敏.信任基本问题研究[D].东北财经大学硕士学位论文.2003
[21]. 赵娟.中学教师组织信任和知识分享意愿的关系研究[D]. 华南师范大学硕士学位论文.2007
[22]. 刘广彬.经济交易中的信任问题研究[D].东北财经大学硕士学位论文 .2005
[23]. 奉美凤 .中小学教师的工作满意度与组织承诺对其离职倾向的影响研究[D].华南师范大学硕士学位论文 .2007
[24]. 高岚.中学教师职业倦怠现状极其影响因素研究[D].河北师范大学硕士学位论文.2006
[25]. 陈剑梅.中学教师素质结构及现状评价[D].苏州大学硕士学位论文.2006
[26]. 王睿 .中学教师的职业倦怠状况[D].南京师范大学硕士学位论文.2006
[27]. 何伟.中学教师工作满意感的个案调查[D].华东师范大学硕士学位论文.2002
[28]. 赵红梅.关于农村中学教师专业化发展的思考[D].山东师范大学教育硕士学位论文.2006
[29]. 郭志鸿.中学教师管理的现状及思考[D].华中师范大学硕士学位论文 .2004