摘要
本论文采用群落性质的几个常用参数及系统类平均聚类法,于2001年11月至2002年10月对深圳市荔枝无公害防治园、常规防治园及空白园昆虫群落(包括蛛形纲)进行了分析研究,结果表明:
深圳市荔枝园昆虫群落共包括18个目(昆虫纲16个目和蛛形纲2个目),共369种。其中,昆虫纲包括119个科,共348种,蛛形纲共21种。在整个昆虫群落中,己明确为害虫的有63种,占整个群落的17.07%;天敌(包括捕食性天敌与寄生性天敌)79种,占整个群落的21.41%;中性昆虫227种,占整个群落的61.52%。
三个试验区害虫调查总数量为4935头,各区数量大小依次为:空白区(2213头)>无公害区(1551头)>常规区(1171头),关键害虫为三角新小卷叶蛾,荔枝蛀蒂虫,茶材小蠹,荔枝叶瘿蚊,荔枝瘿螨,樟翠尺蛾,荔枝蝽。各试验区天敌数量大小依次为:空白区(1167头)>无公害区(827头)>常规区(515头),主要天敌为中华草蛉,瓢虫,茧蜂,蜘蛛,各区其累计优势度指数均大于0.9000。三个试验区中性昆虫数量大小依次为:空白区(3169头)>常规区(2308头)>无公害区(2302头)。中性昆虫群落中,以膜翅目蚁科种类及数量最多,其群落数量为2203头,优势度指数为0.2832;其次是鞘翅目隐翅甲昆虫,数量为1619头,优势度指数为0.2081;再次是鳞翅目的螟蛾、夜蛾,同翅目的叶蝉,鞘翅目的拟步甲,双翅目的丽蝇等昆虫。无公害区害虫、天敌及中性昆虫的比率与空白区相似,其害虫与天敌的比率均高于常规区。
荔枝园昆虫群落可划分为植食类,捕食类,寄生类,腐食类4个营养层;7个功能集团:即地下害虫,食叶、花、果害虫,刺吸害虫,蛀干害虫,捕食类,寄生类,中性昆虫;32个类群;41个优势种;10个关键物种。个别优势种在适当的条件下可演变为关键物种。
深圳市荔枝园昆虫群落中,植食类群主要优势种为三角新小卷蛾、樟翠尺蛾、荔枝蛀蒂虫、荔枝蝽、荔枝瘿螨、荔枝叶瘿蚊、茶材小蠹、斜纹夜蛾、小绿叶蝉。捕食性天敌优势种为四斑月瓢虫、食螨瓢虫、中华草蛉及蜘蛛。寄生性天敌以荔蝽卵跳小蜂、显茧蜂为主。腐食类群优势种为蚁类、隐翅甲、德国小蠊。荔枝主要害虫多与荔枝的生理发育期相吻合。
昆虫群落动态研究结果表明:各试验区间害虫、天敌及整个昆虫群落的数量与丰富度差异明显,无公害区与常规区各群落多样性指数、均匀性指数动态变化趋势一致,空白区与两处理区多样性指数、均匀性指数动态变化趋势差异较大。无公害区除害虫高发期害虫丰富度略低于常规区外,各群落数量、丰富度及多样性指数多数月份要高于常规区。无公害区害虫与天敌优势种突出,均匀性指数比常规区偏低。三个试验区各月间群落各性质差异明显。
对黑光灯具有明显趋性的荔枝害虫主要有樟翠尺蛾、三角新小卷叶蛾、茶材
小葱、咖啡豹蠢蛾、红脚绿金龟、独角犀金龟、大造桥虫、黄绿短头叶蝉、光绿
菱纹姬叶蝉、黄翅大白蚁。
荔枝园不同的空间层次具有不同的昆虫分布特点。地表是害虫发生最轻的一
个层次,以中性昆虫居多。枝干害虫的发生要重于地表害虫。树冠是害虫发生最
多的一个层次,树冠外膛害虫发生重于内膛,外膛以食叶、花、果害虫为主,内
膛以蛀干害虫及刺吸式害虫为主。另外,树冠也是天敌类群最多的一个层次,枝
二「与地表上天敌种类数量则相对较少。
果园管理措施不同,昆虫群落发生也有所不同。根据三种管理类型果园的群
落特点,结合田间调查实际,可将深圳市荔枝园昆虫群落划分为以下四类,并提
出相应的害虫无公害防治举措:第一类(冬防期),即11一2月。主要任务是防
治越冬虫源。结合冬季修剪,剪除树冠虫枝、衰弱密枝、清洁地表枯枝落叶落果、
控制冬梢、翻松表土,减少越冬虫源。第二类(春防期),即3月。对于常发性
害虫,一般采用压低虫源、实行挑治或兼治的办法。同时,注意防治荔枝蜷、荔
枝痪蜻、荔枝叶痪蚊、茶材小者等主要害虫。第三类(夏防期),即4一6月。害
虫防治以保果为中心,采取以农业防治为基础,生物防治为核心,辅以必要的药
剂防治、物理防治,达到控制害虫的日的。第四类(秋防期),即7一10月。采
取农业防治和生物防治为主的无公害防治措施,达到控制害虫,保护环境和天敌
的目的。
In this paper, adopting the several common use parameters and methods of systematic sort-average-clustering, author researched the insect community (including spider) in harmless control section, general and blank control sections during Nov, 2001 to Oct, 2002 in Shenzhen city. The results indicate:
The insect community in Shenzhen city includes 18 orders (insecta: 16 orders, spider: 2 orders) and 369 species. The insecta includes 119 families and 348 species, and the spider includes 21 species. In the whole insect community, the pests that have been defined include 63 species, which hold the 17.07% of whole community. The natural enemies (including predacity and parasitical enemy) include 79 species, which hold the 21.41% of the whole community. The moderate insect includes 227 species, which hold the 61.52% of the whole community.
The total quantity of pest in the three experimentation sections is 4935, and the sequence of quantity to the three sections is blank section(2213)>harmless section (1551)>general section(1171). The key pests are Olethreutes leucaspis Meyrick, Conopomorpha sinemis Bradley, Xyleborm fornicatus Eichhoff, Dasineura sp. , Aceria litchii (Kiefer), Thalassodes quadraria Guen e, Tessaratoma papillosa (Drury). The quantity of natural enemy in the three sections is: blank section(1167)>harmless section(827)>general section(515), and the main natural enemies are Chrysopa sinica Tjeder, ladybug, Bracon Fabricus and spider. The accumulative dominance index of each section exceeds 0.9000.The sequence of moderate insect quantity of the three sections is blank section(3169)> general section(2308)>harmless section (2302). Among the moderate insect community, the ants of the hymenoptera is more than any other insects as for the species and quantity. The ants' quantity is 2203, and whose dominance index is 0.2832. The quantit
y of the rove beetles of the coleoptera is 1619, and whose dominance index is 0.2081. The pyralids moths and outlet moths of the lepidoptera, the leafhoppers of the homoptera, the darking beetles of coleptera and blow flies of the diptera take the dominant place in moderate insect community. The rates of pest, natural enemy and moderate insect in harmless section are similar with those in blank section, and the rates of pest and natural enemy in harmless section are higher than those in general section.
The insect community of lichee orchard can be divided into 4 nutrient classes, which is phytophagous insect, predacity, parasite and saprophagous. The insect community also can be divided into 7 guilds: underground pest, eating-leaf-flower-fruit pest, puncture and suck pest, bristletail, predacity, parasite and
moderate insect, and be divided into 32 groups, 41 dominance species and 10 key species. Some dominance species can be turned into key species under proper conditions.
In the insect community of lichee orchard, the main dominant phytophagous insects are the Olethreutes leucaspis Meyrick, Thalassodes quadraria Guen6e, Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley, Tessaratoma papillosa (Drury), Aceria litchii (Kiefer), Dasineura sp. , Xylebonts fornicatus Eichhoff, Prodenia litvara Fabricius, Empoasca flavescens (Fab.). The dominant predacity enemies are Chilomenes quadriplaglata fSwartz), Stethorus spp.,Chrysopa sinica Tjeder and the spider.The Ooencyrtus sp. and Phanerotoma spp. take the prior place in the parasite enemy . The dominant saprophagous insect are the ants, rove beetles and Blattella germanica Linnaeus. The main lichee pests are accord with the physiological growth period of lichee.
The research result of insect community development indicate: the differences to quantity and richness of pest, natural enemy and whole insect community among experiment sections are distinct. The dynamic uptrend of diversity and evenness indexes between harmless section and general section are analogical, but that of blank section and two manage sections is different. Besides the richness of pest in harmless section is lower than that in blank section during fastigium, the quantit
引文
1 韦绥概,冯远斌,韦民.荔枝分位瘿螨空间分布型及抽样技术.广西植保,1996,(04):1~3
2 王广东.荔枝蝽防治措施.柑桔与亚热带果树信息,1999,(06):37
3 王克林,梁玉娥,陈慧.荔枝蝽的药剂防治试验.广西植保,1999,12(03):25~26
4 卢金华.几种杀虫剂对荔枝蝽象的防效试验.福建农业科技,1994,(5):10
5 占志雄,王长方,卢学松.溴氰菊酯防治荔枝蝽蟓药效试验.农药,1997,36(12):34~35
6 刘志诚.利用人工寄主卵繁殖平腹小蜂防治荔枝蝽蟓.生物防治通报,1986,2(2):54~58
7 刘国强,彭建平.氟杀对荔枝蝽的防效.福建农业科技,1995,(06):39
8 刘友樵,徐洁莲.危害荔枝的新害虫——荔枝巢蛾.昆虫知识,1997,34(03):148~149
9 刘志诚,刘建峰,余胜权.荔枝丰产栽培技术彩色图说.北京:中国农业出版社,1998:1
10 刘希喋,赖澄清.人工繁殖平腹小蜂防治荔枝蝽技术.中国南方果树,1998,27(03):31
11 刘德广,张润杰.荔枝主要害虫及其防治.昆虫天敌,1998,20(02):75~80
12 刘德广,罗玉钏,谭炳林,黄明度.荔枝—牧草复合系统节肢动物群落的研究Ⅰ.数量和优势集中度比较分析.中山大学学报(自然科学版),1999,38(S1):126~129
13 刘德广,梁伟光,丁勇,黄明度.复合荔枝园节肢动物群落动态的研究.生态学报,1999,19(6):885~889
14 刘德广,罗玉钏,梁伟光,黄明度.复合荔枝园寄生性天敌群落的研究.昆虫大敌,1999,21(03):135~140
15 刘德广,熊锦君,谭炳林,黄明度,张润杰.荔枝—牧草复合系统节肢动物群落多样性与稳定性分析.生态学报,2001,21(10):1596~1601
16 李典谟.系统分析与害虫的综合管理.昆虫知识,1986,22(3):125~129
17 何等平,王心燕,周北沛,招小东.荔枝爻纹细蛾生物学研究及其在防治上的应用.华南农业大学学报,1986,7(1):43~48
18 吴伟南,蓝文明,刘依华.中国荔枝植绥螨种类及其利用价值.昆虫天敌,1991,13(3):82~91
19 余家林.农业多元试验统计.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993:137~158
20 余胜权,方立新,唐文清,薛云,刘建峰,王春夏,李教松,刘志诚.荔枝主要病虫害无公省防治技术研究.广东农业科学,1995,(03):38~40
21 沈育才.天牛在龙眼荔枝的发生为害及防治.福建热作科技,1996,21(04):40
22 佘春仁,潘蓉英,古德祥,陈海东.利用平腹小蜂防治荔枝蝽若干技术问题探讨.福建农业大学学报,1997,26(04):441~445
23 李伟群,邓国荣,杨皇红.荔蝽卵跳小蜂对荔枝蝽卵寄生情况的初步研究.广西植保,1998,(03):1~3
24 李少辉.茶材小蠹对荔枝的为害及其防治技术措施.福建热作科技,1998,23(04):36~37
25 陈炳旭,黄汉杰.农地乐乳油防治荔枝蒂蛀虫药效试验.广东农业科学,1999,(04):42~43
26 罗启浩.昆虫病原线虫防治拟木蠹蛾和天牛幼虫的研究.华南农业大学学报,1997,(1):25~27
27 林兰稳,郑煜基.荔枝叶瘿蚊的发生及综合防治措施.广东农业科学,1997,(03):36
28 罗启浩,伍亚泰,欧美霖,陈宇锋,许凤.荔枝巢蛾的研究.华南农业大学学报,1998,19(03):31~35
29 林来金.警惕荔枝的毁灭性害虫——茶材小蠹.植保技术与推广,1999,19(05):23~24
30 张茂盛,黄锡栋.荔枝害虫——茶材小蠹的综合防治技术.福建热作科技,1999,24(02):38~39
31 杨平,熊锦君,刘德广,黄明度.荔枝、龙眼园使用机油乳剂的安全性及其对荔枝蛀蒂虫的防治研究.昆虫天敌,2002,24(1):26~30
32 贤振华,李伟群,邓国荣,甘铁军,杨皇红,黄大兴.荔枝蛀蒂虫的发生危害期与防治.广西植保,2000,13(2):28~29
33 周强,刘楚生,黎华寿.荔枝害虫防治策略概述.走向21世纪的中国昆虫学(李典谟主编:中国昆虫学会2000年学术年会论文集):北京:中国科学技术出版社,2000:693~696
34 周强,刘楚生,黎华寿.荔枝瘿螨越冬种群空间结构分析.走向21世纪的中国昆虫学(李典谟主编:中国昆虫学会2000年学术年会论文集).北京:中国科学技术出版社,2000:475~476
35 赵善欢.应用敌百虫防治荔枝椿象的大田试验.植物保护学报,1964,3(2):123~130
36 姚祖仪,徐金汉.利用平腹小蜂防治荔枝蝽象技术.植保技术与推广,1996,16(05):22~23
37 俞开堂,郑敏燕.注射法防治荔枝龙眼果蛀虫试验.福建农业科技,1998,(02):22
38 郑惜卿.荔枝茶材小蠹的防治.柑桔与亚热带果树信息,1999,(03):37
39 徐洁莲,韩日畴,刘秀玲.应用毒针防治荔枝龟背天牛幼虫试验.广东农业科学,1994,(01):35~36
40 徐洁莲,韩日畴,刘秀玲.应用苹果蠹蛾线虫防治荔枝龟背天牛幼虫的研究.广西植保,1995,(4):8
41 徐金汉,李心忠.荔枝瘿螨的天敌——亚热冲绥螨的生物学及其捕食效能.华东昆虫学报,1995,4(01):61~64
42 徐金汉,李心忠.荔枝瘿螨种群动态及其生物学特性.福建农业大学学报,1996,25(04):458~460
43 郝树广,张孝羲,程避平.稻田节肢动物群落营养层及优势功能集团的组成与多样性动态.昆虫学报,1998,41(4):343~353
44 郭依泉.生物群落结构多样性测度初探.西南农业大学学报,1988,10(2):150~157
45 黄启钟.嘉南地区荔枝细蛾之危害习性及种群消长.植物保护学会会刊,1994,36(1):85~95
46 黄宏英.荔枝瘿螨的发生及防治研究.广西农业科学,1995,(04):172~174
47 龚标勋.荔枝龟背天牛的防治方法.植物医生,1997,10(01):17
48 黄东光.荔枝丰产栽培技术.广州:广东高等教育出版社,1999:3~12
49 黄衍章,江世宏,钱学聪,杨长举.中国荔枝害虫治理现状及展望.深圳职业技术学院学报,2002,1(1):26~32
50 蒲蜇龙,麦秀慧,黄明度.利用平腹小蜂防治荔枝椿象试验初报.植物保护学报,1962,1(2):301~306
51 魏宏森.系统理论中的科学方法与哲学问题.北京:清华大学出版社,1984:1~10
52 韩日畴,徐洁莲,曹莉,刘秀玲.荔枝龟背天牛幼虫空间分布型研究.昆虫天敌,1994,16(4):175~182
53 韩日畴,刘秀玲,徐洁莲.昆虫病原线虫对荔枝龟背天牛幼虫空间格局的影响及经济阀值研究.昆虫天敌,1996,18(3):99~105
54 蔡汉雄,田梅.敌杀死防治荔枝蝽象药效试验.广东农业科学,1996,(04):38~39
55 谭仕东,韦金道,韦龙新.龙眼金龟子害虫群落结构及动态研究.广西热作科技,1993,(03):4~10
56 谭仕东,韦金道,蓝如新.荔枝龙眼害虫群落结构相似性分析.广西热作科技,1998,(04):4~10
57 蔡志英.荔枝瘿壁虱的防治方法.柑桔与亚热带果树信息,1999,(04):31~32
58 谭仕东,韦金道,蓝如新,韦金先.荔枝害虫群落结构及其动态研究.植物保护学报,1999,26(03):213~218
59 潘卫东,戈峰,染植湖,莫国辉,谭建军.荔枝蛀蒂虫性引诱剂诱捕效果分析.走向21世纪的中国昆虫学(李典谟主编:中国昆虫学会2000年学术年会论文集).北京:中国科学技术出版社,2000:689~692
60 黎华寿,李庆勋,骆世明,王建武,周强,章家恩.荔枝绿色食品栽培技术.广东农业科学,2001,1:27~29
61 Peter W.Price.昆虫生态学(北京大学生物系昆虫学教研室译).北京:人民教育出版社,1981
62 Djou Y. M. Lichee Fruit destoryed by Deudorix epijarbas Moor (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae).Ling. Sci. Jour. 1988,17(3):401~405
63 Kumar, M. Efficacy of certain insecticides in the control of sap beetles on the litchi fruit. Pesticides (Bombay),1989,23(3):31~32
64 Marloth, R. H. The litchii in South Africa. R. A. E. 1947, A:39~143
65 May, R. M. Stability in multispecies communities. Math. Biosci. 1971,12:59~79
66 Odam, E. P. Basic ecology. Philadelphia:Saunders College Publishing, 1983:408~429
67 Simpson, E. H. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949,136:688
68 Sharma, D. D. India-New record of predatory mites on litchi mite (Aceria litchii Kerfer) in Bihar. Rev. Ann. Ento, 1983, A. 72: 5421
69 Singh, Harcharan. Developing some parameters for effective control of nut—borer in litchi. J Res. Pubjab Agric. Univ, 1990,27(3):150~157
70 Watt, K. E. F. Comments on fluctuations of animal populations and measures of community stability. Can. Entomol, 1964,96:1434~1442
71 Watt, K. E. F. Community and stability and the strategy of biology control. Can. Entomol, 1965,97:887~895