信用政府的建构：社会资本与政府信用的关系视角
|
摘要
长期以来,政府的形象与权力合法性在多维的网络社会中受到社会公众的普遍关注,世界范围内各国政府普遍遭遇了信任危机的挑战,使得信用政府建设也面临着严峻的考验。构建一个充满民主、活力、信任的信用政府是21世纪世界各国政府致力改善的行动目标。改革开放30多年来积累的经济财富和民主意识,使得社会资本的力量在中国蓬勃发展,各种形式的组织、社团与政府之间建立的合作关系支撑着整个社会的发展与进步。因此,信用政府的建构对于树立良好的公众形象、健全社会信用体系和提升政府公信力都具有十分强烈的现实意义。信用政府的建构问题正是在这样的复杂背景下纳入公众视野的,然而学者更多关注的是如何提升政府自身信用,很大程度上忽视了社会资本的因素。
社会资本与政府信用的关系视角是研究信用政府建构的切入点。将西部地区的县级地方政府作为研究对象,采取理论演绎与实证分析相结合的方法,以社会资本与政府信用的关系为主线,以新的分析框架构建为逻辑起点,选取云南省县级地方政府作为调查样本进行了实证分析,并着重探讨了信用政府建构的实现路径。具体来说,通过回顾社会资本的嬗变和剖析政府信用的双重效应,从历史与现实的角度挖掘了转型时期县域社会资本的变迁历程,以及地方政府信用的形成机理与缺失内源,并以社会资本与政府信用的关系为切入点进行了信用政府建构的愿景分析与逻辑阐释,成为本研究一个重要的理论突破。在此基础上,以实地访谈和调查问卷的形式采集了129个县级区域的样本数据进行实证检验,综合运用描述性统计分析、单因素方差分析、验证性因子分析和结构方程模型等方法研究了二者之间的影响方式与作用机理,适时提出了社会资本关联性和政府信用传导性的观点,进而比较了信用政府建构的三种模式,最终形成二元协同发展的建构模式——社会资本与政府信用的相互促进,主要包括政治信任的凝聚、多元网络的融合和制度规范的约束。
研究表明,信用政府的建构处在社会资本与政府信用之间,具有两个重要的特征,即“社会资本的恒定性”和“政府信用的共振性”。结构方程模型的数据拟合与修正结果也基本印证了西部地区县域空间中信用政府建构的内在关系,既体现了社会资本的内在关联,还凸显了政府信用的传导特性,主要得出以下四大结论：(1)以人为建构的正式规则已经逐渐在县域经济合作中崭露头角,然而,社会规范的正向作用始终依附于社会资本的其他结构要素；(2)西部地区县域空间网络规模充分凸显了组织信任的重要性,但是汲取网络资源的手段和实现路径却仍与人际信任有着较大关联性,信任关系纽带分别支撑着网络规模的扩张和网络资源吸取,而社会规范作为关系网络的行动准则与标尺,扮演着维护社会网络稳定性的功能角色；(3)政府能力的传导性是信用政府所表现的共性特征,不同之处在于传导路径的多少,它与外部区域的社会资本存量、结构有关,这是一种内在影响传导路径的制度因素；(4)政府能力的提升和政府公信的滑坡造成了政府信用内在结构的不协调,但是,内在非一致性特征却没有阻碍政府官员的政治晋升和县域经济社会发展,逐渐呈现出一种自我维系、自我协调的特有信用规则,这是压力型政府下特有的信用规则。
For a long time, government image and legitimacy of power have received intensive public attention in the multi-dimensional network society. In the circumstance of worldwide trust crisis of government, the construction of trustworthy government is also facing a severe test. Building a trustworthy government is an improving operational target to all countries in the 21st century, including democracy, energy and trust. The economy wealth and democratic consciousness which were accumulated in the 30-year's reform and opening up have caused the power of social capital to flourish in China. It is the partnership between the government and various forms of organizations as well as associations that supports the development and progress of the entire society. Therefore, constructing the trustworthy government has a very strong practical significance on establishing a good public image, social credit system and enhancing the credibility of the government. The issue of constructing the trustworthy government aroused the attention of public in such complex background, while what the public concerned most is not the social capital but how to improve the government's own credit.
The perspective of relationship between social capital and government trustworthiness is the point of penetration of this thesis to trustworthy government constructing. By means of reviewing the evolution of social capital and analyzing the dual effect on government trustworthiness, this thesis taps the changes of social capital in the transitional period of county's history from the perspective of history and reality, and analyzes the formation mechanism of local government trustworthiness and the internal root of trustworthiness lacking. The most important theoretical breakthrough of this thesis is to elaborate the plan of trustworthy government constructing and logical description of penetration of the relationship between social capital and government trustworthiness. By field interviews and questionnaire, this thesis collected a sample of 129 county-level regional data for empirical analysis so as to study the effects and mechanism, and proposed the views such as relevance of social capital and government trustworthiness conductivity via using descriptive statistical analysis, ANOVA analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. On this basis, this thesis finally proposed the constructing model of binary coordinate development by a comparative analysis of three models of constructing the government credit. The aforementioned model, including coherence of political trust, integration of diversity network and constraint of system standards, is the mutual promotion between the social capital and government trustworthiness.
The study indicates that constructing of trustworthy government between social capital and government trustworthiness. It has two important features:the constant of social capital and the resonance of government trustworthiness. Data fitting and amendment results have confirmed the intrinsic relationship of constructing of trustworthy government in the West Country space, which reflects not only inter-related social capital, but also conduction characteristics of government trustworthiness. There are four main conclusions as following:
(1) Formal rules of the human-constructed have been gradually emerging in county cooperation and economic and social development. However, the positive role of social norms is also dependent on other structural elements of social capital.
(2) The size of network highlights the importance of organizational trust in the western region, but the means of assimilating network resources and implementing path have more relationships with interpersonal trust. Trust ties have respectively supported the network expansion and network resources drain. Social norms play a functional role in the stability of social networks, which serve as guidelines for action and scale.
(3) The conductivity of the government capacity is the common feature of the trustworthy government, and the difference is about how many of transmission paths there are. It relates to the social capital stock and structure at external area and it is also a system factor which has an inner influence on the transmission path.
(4) The development of government's capacity and the erosion of public trust in government cause the internal structure in coordination of government trustworthiness, but the internal inconsistency do not hinder the political promotion of government officials and the development of society and economy at county level, which has shown a special credit rule of self-support and self-coordination, and this is the special credit rule of "pressurization government".
社会资本与政府信用的关系视角是研究信用政府建构的切入点。将西部地区的县级地方政府作为研究对象,采取理论演绎与实证分析相结合的方法,以社会资本与政府信用的关系为主线,以新的分析框架构建为逻辑起点,选取云南省县级地方政府作为调查样本进行了实证分析,并着重探讨了信用政府建构的实现路径。具体来说,通过回顾社会资本的嬗变和剖析政府信用的双重效应,从历史与现实的角度挖掘了转型时期县域社会资本的变迁历程,以及地方政府信用的形成机理与缺失内源,并以社会资本与政府信用的关系为切入点进行了信用政府建构的愿景分析与逻辑阐释,成为本研究一个重要的理论突破。在此基础上,以实地访谈和调查问卷的形式采集了129个县级区域的样本数据进行实证检验,综合运用描述性统计分析、单因素方差分析、验证性因子分析和结构方程模型等方法研究了二者之间的影响方式与作用机理,适时提出了社会资本关联性和政府信用传导性的观点,进而比较了信用政府建构的三种模式,最终形成二元协同发展的建构模式——社会资本与政府信用的相互促进,主要包括政治信任的凝聚、多元网络的融合和制度规范的约束。
研究表明,信用政府的建构处在社会资本与政府信用之间,具有两个重要的特征,即“社会资本的恒定性”和“政府信用的共振性”。结构方程模型的数据拟合与修正结果也基本印证了西部地区县域空间中信用政府建构的内在关系,既体现了社会资本的内在关联,还凸显了政府信用的传导特性,主要得出以下四大结论：(1)以人为建构的正式规则已经逐渐在县域经济合作中崭露头角,然而,社会规范的正向作用始终依附于社会资本的其他结构要素；(2)西部地区县域空间网络规模充分凸显了组织信任的重要性,但是汲取网络资源的手段和实现路径却仍与人际信任有着较大关联性,信任关系纽带分别支撑着网络规模的扩张和网络资源吸取,而社会规范作为关系网络的行动准则与标尺,扮演着维护社会网络稳定性的功能角色；(3)政府能力的传导性是信用政府所表现的共性特征,不同之处在于传导路径的多少,它与外部区域的社会资本存量、结构有关,这是一种内在影响传导路径的制度因素；(4)政府能力的提升和政府公信的滑坡造成了政府信用内在结构的不协调,但是,内在非一致性特征却没有阻碍政府官员的政治晋升和县域经济社会发展,逐渐呈现出一种自我维系、自我协调的特有信用规则,这是压力型政府下特有的信用规则。
For a long time, government image and legitimacy of power have received intensive public attention in the multi-dimensional network society. In the circumstance of worldwide trust crisis of government, the construction of trustworthy government is also facing a severe test. Building a trustworthy government is an improving operational target to all countries in the 21st century, including democracy, energy and trust. The economy wealth and democratic consciousness which were accumulated in the 30-year's reform and opening up have caused the power of social capital to flourish in China. It is the partnership between the government and various forms of organizations as well as associations that supports the development and progress of the entire society. Therefore, constructing the trustworthy government has a very strong practical significance on establishing a good public image, social credit system and enhancing the credibility of the government. The issue of constructing the trustworthy government aroused the attention of public in such complex background, while what the public concerned most is not the social capital but how to improve the government's own credit.
The perspective of relationship between social capital and government trustworthiness is the point of penetration of this thesis to trustworthy government constructing. By means of reviewing the evolution of social capital and analyzing the dual effect on government trustworthiness, this thesis taps the changes of social capital in the transitional period of county's history from the perspective of history and reality, and analyzes the formation mechanism of local government trustworthiness and the internal root of trustworthiness lacking. The most important theoretical breakthrough of this thesis is to elaborate the plan of trustworthy government constructing and logical description of penetration of the relationship between social capital and government trustworthiness. By field interviews and questionnaire, this thesis collected a sample of 129 county-level regional data for empirical analysis so as to study the effects and mechanism, and proposed the views such as relevance of social capital and government trustworthiness conductivity via using descriptive statistical analysis, ANOVA analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. On this basis, this thesis finally proposed the constructing model of binary coordinate development by a comparative analysis of three models of constructing the government credit. The aforementioned model, including coherence of political trust, integration of diversity network and constraint of system standards, is the mutual promotion between the social capital and government trustworthiness.
The study indicates that constructing of trustworthy government between social capital and government trustworthiness. It has two important features:the constant of social capital and the resonance of government trustworthiness. Data fitting and amendment results have confirmed the intrinsic relationship of constructing of trustworthy government in the West Country space, which reflects not only inter-related social capital, but also conduction characteristics of government trustworthiness. There are four main conclusions as following:
(1) Formal rules of the human-constructed have been gradually emerging in county cooperation and economic and social development. However, the positive role of social norms is also dependent on other structural elements of social capital.
(2) The size of network highlights the importance of organizational trust in the western region, but the means of assimilating network resources and implementing path have more relationships with interpersonal trust. Trust ties have respectively supported the network expansion and network resources drain. Social norms play a functional role in the stability of social networks, which serve as guidelines for action and scale.
(3) The conductivity of the government capacity is the common feature of the trustworthy government, and the difference is about how many of transmission paths there are. It relates to the social capital stock and structure at external area and it is also a system factor which has an inner influence on the transmission path.
(4) The development of government's capacity and the erosion of public trust in government cause the internal structure in coordination of government trustworthiness, but the internal inconsistency do not hinder the political promotion of government officials and the development of society and economy at county level, which has shown a special credit rule of self-support and self-coordination, and this is the special credit rule of "pressurization government".
引文
[1]Alfonso J.Damico, M. Margaret Conway, Sandra Bowman Damico. Patterns of Political Trust and Mistrust:Tree Moments in the Lives of Democratic Citizens [J]. Polity,2000, Vol.32, No.3, pp.377-400
[2]Almond, G. A.&Verba. The Civic Culture:Political Attitudes and Democracy in five Nations [M]. Princetion University Press,1963
[3]Adler P.S, Kwon S.W. Social Capital:Prospects for a new Concept [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002, Vol.27, No.1, pp.17-40
[4]Andrew Tucker. The Role of Reflexive Trust in Modernizing Public Administrations [J]. Public Performance & Management Review,2004, Vol.28, No.1, pp.53-74
[5]Arrow K. the Limits of Organization [M]. New York:Norton,1974
[6]Barber B. the Logic and Limits of Trust [M]. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press, 1983
[7]Boix Carles, DanielN Posner. Social Capital:Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance [J]. British Journal of Political Science,1998, Vol.28, pp.686-693
[8]Bour-dieu P. the Forms of Capital [A]. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education [M]. Westport, CT:Greenwood Press,1986
[9]Brehm John, Wendy M. Rahn. Individual-level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital [J]. American Journal of Political Science,1997, Vol.41,No.10, pp.999-1023
[10]Brunetti A., Kisunko G., Weder B. Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth [J]. World Bank Economic Review,1998, Vol.12, No.3, pp.353-384
[11]Campbell K. E., B. A. Lee. Name Generators in Surveys of Personal Neighbor Networks [J]. Social Networks,1991, Vol.13
[12]Caroline J. Tolbert, Karen Mossberger. The Effects of E-government on Trust and Confidence in Government [J]. Public Administration Review,2007, pp.354-369
[13]Chanley, Virginia A., Thomas Rudolph, and Wendy M. Rahn. The Origin and Consequences of Public Trust in Government:A Time Series Analysis [J]. Public Opinion Quarterly,2000, Vol.64, pp.239-257
[14]Charles Tilly. Trust and Rule [J], Theory and Society,2004, Vol.33,No.1, pp.1-30
[15]Christine A. Kelleher, Jennifer Wolak. Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government [J]. Political Research Quarterly,2007, Vol.60, No.4, pp.707-721
[16]Christopher A. Cooper, H. Gibbs Knotts, Kathleen M. Brennan. The Important of Trust in Government for Public Administration:the Case of Zoning [J]. Public Administration Review,2008, pp.459-468
[17]Churchill, G. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1979, Vol.16, No.1, pp.64-73
[18]Citrin, Jack. Comment:the Political Relevance of Trust in Government [J]. American Political Science Review,1974, Vol.68, pp.973-988
[19]Citrin, Jack, Green. Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government [J]. British Journal of Political Science,1986, Vol.16, pp.143-153
[20]Coffe'H., Geys B. Institutional performance and social capital:An application to the local government level [J]. Journal of Urban Affairs,2005, Vol.27, No.5, pp.485-501
[21]Coleman J.S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1988, Vol.94, No.4, pp.143-153
[22]D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay, M. Mastruzzi. Governance Matters V:Governance Indicators for 1996-2005, [EB/OL] http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/govdata 2005/2008-05-17
[23]Dunn, S. C., Seaker, R. F., Waller, M. A. Latent Variables in Business Logistics Research: Scale Development and Validation [J]. Journal of Business Logistics,1994, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 145-172
[24]Enamul Choudhury. Trust in Administration:An Integrative Approach to Optimal Trust [J]. Administration & Society,2008, Vol.40, No.6, pp.586-620
[25]Evans P. Government Action, Social Capital and Development:Reviewing the Evidence of Synergy [J]. World Development,1996, Vol.24
[26]Freitag M. Bowling the State Back in:Political Institutions and the Creation of Social Capital [J]. European Journal of Political Research,2006, Vol.45, No.1, pp.123-152
[27]Fukuyama, Francis. Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity [M]. NY:Free Press,1996
[28]Gerbing D.W., Anderson J.C. An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1988, Vol.25, No.2, pp.186-192
[29]Goodsell. A New Vision for Public Administration [J]. Public Administration Review,2006, Vol.66, No.4, pp.623-635
[30]Grootaert, C. Household Welfare, and Poverty in Indonesia [Z]. Policy Research Working Paper, the World Bank Social Development Department,1998, pp.2148
[31]Hetherington, Marc J. the Political Relevance of Trust [J]. American Political Science Review, 1998, Vol.92,pp.791-808
[32]Huemer, L. Activating Trust:The Redefinition of Roles and Relationships in an International Construction Project [J]. International Marketing Review,2004, Vol.21, No.2, pp.187-201
[33]Inglehart R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society [M]. Harvard University Press,1990
[34]Jarl K. Kampen. On the Consistency of Citizen and Municipal Level Indicators of Social Capital and Local Government Performance [J]. Soc Indic Res,2010, Vol.97, No.2, pp. 213-228
[35]Joseph S. Nye, Jr. In Government We Don't Trust [J]. Foreign Policy,1997, Vol.108, pp. 99-111
[36]Knack S., Keefer P. Institutions and Economic Performance:Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measure [J]. Economics and Politics,1995, Vol.7, pp.207～227
[37]Kramer, Gerald H. the Ecological Fallacy Revisited:Aggregate-versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections and Sociotropic Voting [J]. American Political Science Review,1983, Vol.77, pp.92-111
[38]Krishna A., Shrader E. Social Capital Assessment Tool [A].Conference Paper for Conference on Social Capital and Poverty Reduction [C]. The World Bank,1999(6)
[39]Lane Robertt E. Political Life [M]. Glencoe:Free Press,1969
[40]Lian Jiang Li. Trust in Rural China [J]. Modern China,2004, Vol.30, No.2, pp.228-258
[41]Loury Glenn C. a Dynamic Theory of Racial Income Differences [A]. In Women, Minorities, and Employment Discrimination[C]. Phvllis Wallace and Annette M. La Mond. eds. Lexington, MA:Heath,1977
[42]Lucke keele. Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government [J]. American Journal of Political Science,2007, Vol.51, No.2, pp.241-254
[43]Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust [J]. Academy of Management Review,1995, Vol.20, pp.709-734
[44]Michael Woolcock. Social Capital and Economic Development:Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework [J]. Theory and Society,1998, Vol.27, No.2, pp.151-208
[45]Miller, Arthur H. Political Issue and Trust in Government,1964-1970 [J]. American Political Science Review,1974, Vol.68, No.3, pp.951-972
[46]Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998, Vol.23, No.2, pp.242-266
[47]Nan Lin. Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action [M]. New York:Cambridge Press,2002.
[48]Nan Lin, Dumin M. Access to Occupations through Social Ties [J]. Social Networks,1991, Vol.8, pp.365-385
[49]Newton Kenneth. Social Capital and European Democracy [M]. Rutledge,1999
[50]N. Luhmann. Trust and Power [M]. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons,1979
[51]Offe, C. How can we trust our fellow citizens? [A]. In Warren M. Democracy and Trust [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1999, pp.87
[52]Pharr J. S, Putnam D. R, Dakton A. A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence [J]. Journal of Democracy,2003, Vol.11(2), pp5-25
[53]Pierre J. the Marketization of the Station [J]. Governance in a Changing Environment, ed. D. J. Savoie and B. G. Peters. Montreal:Mcgill/Queens University Press.1995.
[54]Portes Alejandro. Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration:A Conceptual Overview [A]. The Economic Sociology of Immigration:Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship. [M]. New York, Russell Sage Foundation,1995, pp.12
[55]Potapchuck W, Crocker J., Scheeter W., Boogaard, D. Building Community:Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Local Government. [M]. Washington DC, Program for Community Problem Solving,1997
[56]Prashant Kale, Harbir Singh, Howard Perlmutter. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances:Building relational capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, Vol.21, No.2, pp.17-37
[57]Putnam, Robert D. Making Democracy Work:Civil Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton [M]. Italy:Princeton University press,1993
[58]Rhys Andrews. Organizational Social Capital, Structure and Performance [J]. Human Relations,2010, Vol.63, No.5, pp.583-608
[59]Ronald Burt. Structural Holes [M]. Cambridge:Harvard University press,1992
[60]Rose R. Getting Things Done in an Antipodean Society:Social Capital Networks in Russia [M]. In Dasgupta &Serageeldin,1999
[61]Routledge B.R., Joachim von Amsberg. Social Capital and Growth [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2003, Vol.50, pp.167-193
[62]Skocpol T. Unraveling from Above [J]. The American Prospect,1996, Vol.25
[63]Stolle D. Communities of trust:social capital and public action in comparative perspective [D]. Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University,2000
[64]Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America [M]. New York:Vintage Books,1990
[65]Tullio Jappelli, Marco Pagano. the Value of Government Credit [M]. Harvard University, 1993
[66]Uphoff Norman T. Learning from Gal Oya:Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science [M]. London:Intermediate Technology Publications,1996
[67]Virginia A. Chanley, Thomas J. Rudolph and Wendy M. Rahn. the Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government:A Time Series Analysis [J]. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 2000, Vol.64, No.3, pp.239-256
[68]Wendy M. Rahn, John E. Transue. Social Trust and Value Change:The Decline of Social Capital in American Youth,1976-1995 [J]. Political Psychology,1998, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 545-565
[69]Westlund, H. Implications of Social Capital for Business, in the knowledge Economy: Theoretical Considerations [A]. International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital,2003, pp.21-36
[70]Willamson. O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism [M]. New York:Free Press,1985
[71]Wuthnow R. The United States:Bridging the Privileged and the marginalized? [A]. In Putnam. Democracies in Flux. The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society [M]. Oxford University Press,2002, pp.59-102
[72]Zucker, L. G. Production of Trust:Institutional Sources of Economic Structure,1840-1920 [C]. B. M. Straw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press,1986
[73]Zukin, Sharon and Paul DiMaggio. The Structures of Capital:The Social Organization of the Economy [M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,1990
[74][英]安东尼·吉登斯.现代性与自我认同[M].上海：三联书店,1998
[75][英]安东尼·吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].南京：译林出版社,2000
[76][英]弗里德利希·冯·哈耶克.自由与秩序原理：上册[M].邓正来译.上海：三联书店,1997：199
[77][英]约翰·洛克.政府论(下篇)[M].叶启芳、翟菊农译.北京：商务印书馆,2003
[78][英]约翰·密尔.论自由[M].程崇华译.北京：商务印书馆,1986：60
[79][美]戴维·H·罗森布鲁姆、罗伯特·s·克拉夫丘克.公共行政学：管理、政治和法律的途径[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2002
[80][美]福山.信任：社会道德与繁荣的创造[M].海口：海南出版社,2001
[81][美]克劳斯·奥弗.我们怎样才能信任我们的同胞?[A],民主与信任[C].北京：华夏出版社,2004
[82][美]马克·E.沃伦.民主与信任[M].北京：华夏出版社,2004
[83][美]文森特·奥斯特罗姆.美国公共行政的思想危机[M].上海：上海三联书店,1999
[84][美]英格尔斯.人的现代化——心理、思想、态度、行为[M].殷陆君编译.成都：四川人民出版社,1985：8
[85][法]让·雅克·卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京：商务印书馆,2003
[86][德]柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学：社会秩序与公共政策[M].韩朝华译.北京：商务印书馆,2001
[87][波]彼得·斯托姆普卡.信任：一种社会学理论[M].北京：中华书局,2005：55-68
[88][比]普里戈金,[法]斯唐热.从混沌到有序[M].曾庆宏,沈小峰译.上海：上海译文出版社,1987
[89]安贺新.关于我国政府信用问题的思考[J].中央财经大学学报,2005(3)：23-27
[90]安妮·博格.通过规制实践建立责任与信任[J].国家行政学院学报,2000(5)：8-13
[91]边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2)：23-27
[92]边燕杰.城市居民社会资本的来源及作用：网络观点与调查发现[J].中国社会科学,2004(3)：136-146
[93]蔡晶晶,李德.当代西方政府信任危机透析[J].公共管理学报,2006(4)：100-107
[94]陈柳钦.社会资本及其主要理论研究观点综述[J].东方论坛：青岛大学学报,2007(3)：84-91
[95]陈伟.“标准—普尔”政府信用等级评价体系简析[J].国际金融研究,2003(1)：47-52
[96]陈晓红,吴小瑾.中小企业社会资本的构成及其与信用水平关系的实证研究[J].管理世界,2007(1)：153-155
[97]程宏伟.地方政府信用评价指标体系构建研究[D].浙江大学,2005
[98]程倩.论政府信任关系的历史类型[M].北京：光明日报出版社,2009
[99]戴长征.腐败与反腐败：变革之中的中国面临的严峻挑战[J].中国行政管理,2004(9)：46-49
[100]迪戈·甘姆贝塔.我们能信任信任吗?[J].国外社会学,2000(3)：51
[101]董建新.政府是否是“经济人”?[J].中国行政管理,2004(3)：65-69
[102]范柏乃,龙海波.基于政府能力视角地方政府应急管理研究[J].理论与改革,2009(4)：84-87
[103]范柏乃,龙海波.我国地方政府失信形成机理与惩罚机制研究[J].浙江大学学报,2010(3)：164-173
[104]范柏乃,蓝志勇.公共管理研究与定量分析方法[M].北京：科学出版社,2008年
[105]范柏乃,金明路,程宏伟.我国地方政府信用水平的实证调查[J].行政与法,2005(1)：24-26
[106]范柏乃,张鸣.政府信用的影响因素与管理机制研究[J].浙江大学学报,2009(2)：43-52
[107]费孝通.乡土中国[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2007
[108]冯木林.我国地方政府信用的建设现状与影响因素的实证研究[D].浙江大学,2008
[109]顾新,郭耀煌,李久平.社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003(5)：44-48
[110]郭荣贵.中国社会资本变迁过程中的政府规制改革研究[D].华东师范大学,2005
[111]过勇.经济转轨、制度与腐败[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2001
[112]过勇,胡鞍钢.行政垄断、寻租与腐败——转型经济的腐败机理分析[J].经济社会体质比较,2003(2)：61-69
[113]何建华.市场秩序：从人伦信用到契约信用[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社,2008
[114]何霜梅.社群主义、服务型政府与善治[J].中央社会主义学院学报,2010(2)：78-80
[115]何水.协同治理及其在中国的实现——基于社会资本理论的分析[J].西南大学学报,2008(5)：102-106
[116]何显明.信用政府的逻辑[M].上海：学林出版社,2007
[117]“湖南政府信用建设研究”课题组.政府信用现状调查与对策分析[J].社会主义研究,2004(5)：106-108
[118]胡荣.社会资本与地方治理[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2009
[119]黄广明.首次市长支持率调查“惊世骇俗”[N].南方周末,2002-8-22
[120]黄文平.信用经济与政府责任[J].学术月刊,2002(4)：84-91
[121]句华.信用经济与政府信用的保障机制[J].社会科学辑刊,2003(1)：45-49
[122]李长江.市场经济条件下政府信用研究的重要性及政府信用模型构建[J].东南大学学报,2003(4)：55-58
[123]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安：西安交通大学出版社,2004
[124]李惠斌,杨雪冬.社会资本与社会发展[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000
[125]李六.社会资本：形成机制与作用机制研究[D].复旦大学,2010
[126]李新春.信任、忠诚与家族主义困境[J].管理世界,2002(6)：87-93
[127]李晓玉.政府信用研究综述[J].学习月刊,2006(24)：15-16
[128]李杨,王良健,欧朝敏.评价地方政府信用的方法研究[J].生产力研究,2007(7)：77-78
[129]林聚任等.社会信任和社会资本重建——当前乡村社会关系研究[M].济南：山东人民出版社,2007
[130]刘智勇.论加强政府信用建设的必要性及其实现途径[J].西南民族大学学报,2005(1)：332-334
[131]龙海波.官僚体制的基本要素解构：评《经济与社会》中“官僚体制统治”[J].中共杭州市委党校学报,2010(6)：48-53
[132]龙海波.新时期我国高校信用失范成因与形成机理探析[J].中国高教研究,2009(6)：64-65
[133]卢燕平.社会资本与我国经济和谐发展[J].统计研究,2007(10)：9-14
[134]罗家德,张绅震.信息化组织与科层组织社会资本形成因素之比较[z].台湾线上网络社会研究中心,线上出版
[135]马长山.法制进程中的“民间治理”[M].北京：法律出版社,2006：16-17
[136]马得勇,王正绪.社会资本、民主发展与政府治理——对69个国家的比较研究[J].开放时代,2009(5)：70-83
[137]马克思.资本论(第3卷)[M].北京：人民出版社,1975
[138]《马克思恩格斯全集》第46卷(上)[M].北京：人民出版社,1979：104
[139]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京：科学出版社,2002
[140]毛寿龙.政府向人大报告举债是好的开始[EB/OL].http://post.csonline.com.cn/pinglin/ shizhengpinglun/t20040301_130945.htm,2009-3-14
[141]倪星.公共权力委托-代理视角下的官员腐败研究[J].中山大学学报,2009(6)：148-157
[142]黎珍.正义与和谐——政治哲学视野中的社会资本[M].北京：人民出版社,2008
[143]潘松挺.网络关系强度与技术创新模式的耦合及其协同演化[D].浙江大学,2009
[144]荣敬本等.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京：中央编译出版社,1998
[145]阮德信.区域信用制度研究[M].南昌：江西人民出版社,2008
[146]沈海军.WTO规则下发展中国家政府信用重建的比较研究[J].江汉论坛,2003(9)：34-36
[147]沈荣华.中国地方政府学[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2006
[148]沈圆.我国地方政府信用的影响因素及其提升路径研究[D].浙江大学,2011
[149]申振东.和谐社会构建中的行政发展价值选择[J].贵州社会科学,2007(8)：4-6
[150]隋广军,盖翊中.城市社区社会资本及其测量[J].学术研究,2002(7)：21-23
[151]石本惠.现代政府信用建设研究[J].社会科学研究,2004(3)：14-18
[152]孙亚忠.政府规制、寻租与政府信用的缺失[J].理论探讨,2007(1)：23-26
[153]孙智英.加强政府信用建设的若干问题[J].东南学术,2003(2)：50-55
[154]《小康》杂志研究中心.及格线上的中国信用[EB/OL].http://news.sohu.com/s2007/ zhongguoxinyong
[155]王存河.政府信用的内涵及制度保障[J].法学评论,2004(5)：62-68
[156]王和平.论政府信用建设[J].政治学研究,2003(1)：73-77
[157]王革,陈文玲.简析政府信用理论的结构[J].天津社会科学,2007(5)：53-55
[158]王积超.社会资本及其测量的理论研究[J].西北民族大学学报,2004(2)：62-65
[159]王强.治理与社会资本问题研究[J].内蒙古民族大学学报,2007(2)：74-77
[160]王秀华,张继文,刘艳梅.政府信用评价方法初探[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(6)：30-33
[161]韦子平.刍议公务员职务消费失范及其治理[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2007(2)：40-42
[162]温伟祥.网络视角下集群企业创业导向及其与绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学,2008
[163]吴爱明,沈荣华,王立平等.服务型政府职能体系[M].北京：人民出版社,2009
[164]吴晶妹.现代信用学[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2009
[165]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务——问卷分析与应用统计[M].北京：科学出版社,2003
[166]向平.服务型政府建设中的地方政府诚信缺失及原因分析[J].社会主义研究,2007(6)：86-88
[167]徐淑芳.诚信与社会资本[J].江西社会科学,2006(12)：16-19
[168]杨璐,李家军.基于ISM模型的地方政府信用风险因素分析[J].统计与决策,2008(22)：43-45
[169]杨秋菊.政府诚信建设研究——基于政府与社会互动的视角[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2009
[170]杨瑞龙,朱春燕.网络与社会资本的经济学分析框架[J].学习与探索,2002(1)：64
[171]杨雪冬.社会资本：对一种新解释范式的探索[G]社会资本与社会发展.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000
[172]杨妍,王振亚.政治文明的生态寓意[J].山东大学学报,2010(1)：89-95
[173]杨永福.“规则”的分析与建构：制度的社会网络基础[D].武汉：武汉理工大学,2002
[174]姚明龙.信用成长环境研究[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社,2005
[175]俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000：8
[176]张成福,孟庆存.重建政府与公民的信任关系——西方国家的经验[J].国家行政学院学报,2003(3)：79-82
[177]张超,张旭升,吴元清.政府信用的社会学本质与政府信用重建：新制度主义视角[J].理论月刊,2008(7)：62-64
[178]张康之.论政府诚信以及政府的社会信用建设功能[J].理论与改革,2004(5)：15-19
[179]张克中.社会资本：中国经济转型与发展的新视角[M].北京：人民出版社,2010
[180]张其仔.社会资本论——社会资本与经济增长[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,1997
[181]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].北京：三联出版社,2001
[182]张维迎.信任及其解释：来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002(10)：59-70
[183]张暄.我国地方政府公信力的提升研究[D].南京航空航天大学,2009
[184]章延杰.政府信用论[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2007
[185]郑也夫.信任论[M].北京：中国广播电视出版社,2001
[186]周伟贤.转轨时期的地方政府信用问题分析[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2010
[187]周小虎.企业家社会资本及其对企业绩效的作用[J].安徽师范大学学报,2002(1)：1-6
[188]朱学勤.书斋里的革命[M].长春：长春出版社,1999
[189]卓成刚,乔姣.社会资本的构建与地方政府的作用[J].中国行政管理,2008(5)：84-87
[190]邹宜斌.社会资本：理论与实证研究文献综述[J].经济评论,2005(6)：120-125
[191]左昊华,林泉.寻租与腐败的运行路径与长期均衡预测——基于演化博弈的分析[J].生产力研究,2009(24)：21-23
[2]Almond, G. A.&Verba. The Civic Culture:Political Attitudes and Democracy in five Nations [M]. Princetion University Press,1963
[3]Adler P.S, Kwon S.W. Social Capital:Prospects for a new Concept [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002, Vol.27, No.1, pp.17-40
[4]Andrew Tucker. The Role of Reflexive Trust in Modernizing Public Administrations [J]. Public Performance & Management Review,2004, Vol.28, No.1, pp.53-74
[5]Arrow K. the Limits of Organization [M]. New York:Norton,1974
[6]Barber B. the Logic and Limits of Trust [M]. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press, 1983
[7]Boix Carles, DanielN Posner. Social Capital:Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance [J]. British Journal of Political Science,1998, Vol.28, pp.686-693
[8]Bour-dieu P. the Forms of Capital [A]. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education [M]. Westport, CT:Greenwood Press,1986
[9]Brehm John, Wendy M. Rahn. Individual-level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital [J]. American Journal of Political Science,1997, Vol.41,No.10, pp.999-1023
[10]Brunetti A., Kisunko G., Weder B. Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth [J]. World Bank Economic Review,1998, Vol.12, No.3, pp.353-384
[11]Campbell K. E., B. A. Lee. Name Generators in Surveys of Personal Neighbor Networks [J]. Social Networks,1991, Vol.13
[12]Caroline J. Tolbert, Karen Mossberger. The Effects of E-government on Trust and Confidence in Government [J]. Public Administration Review,2007, pp.354-369
[13]Chanley, Virginia A., Thomas Rudolph, and Wendy M. Rahn. The Origin and Consequences of Public Trust in Government:A Time Series Analysis [J]. Public Opinion Quarterly,2000, Vol.64, pp.239-257
[14]Charles Tilly. Trust and Rule [J], Theory and Society,2004, Vol.33,No.1, pp.1-30
[15]Christine A. Kelleher, Jennifer Wolak. Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government [J]. Political Research Quarterly,2007, Vol.60, No.4, pp.707-721
[16]Christopher A. Cooper, H. Gibbs Knotts, Kathleen M. Brennan. The Important of Trust in Government for Public Administration:the Case of Zoning [J]. Public Administration Review,2008, pp.459-468
[17]Churchill, G. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1979, Vol.16, No.1, pp.64-73
[18]Citrin, Jack. Comment:the Political Relevance of Trust in Government [J]. American Political Science Review,1974, Vol.68, pp.973-988
[19]Citrin, Jack, Green. Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government [J]. British Journal of Political Science,1986, Vol.16, pp.143-153
[20]Coffe'H., Geys B. Institutional performance and social capital:An application to the local government level [J]. Journal of Urban Affairs,2005, Vol.27, No.5, pp.485-501
[21]Coleman J.S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1988, Vol.94, No.4, pp.143-153
[22]D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay, M. Mastruzzi. Governance Matters V:Governance Indicators for 1996-2005, [EB/OL] http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/govdata 2005/2008-05-17
[23]Dunn, S. C., Seaker, R. F., Waller, M. A. Latent Variables in Business Logistics Research: Scale Development and Validation [J]. Journal of Business Logistics,1994, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 145-172
[24]Enamul Choudhury. Trust in Administration:An Integrative Approach to Optimal Trust [J]. Administration & Society,2008, Vol.40, No.6, pp.586-620
[25]Evans P. Government Action, Social Capital and Development:Reviewing the Evidence of Synergy [J]. World Development,1996, Vol.24
[26]Freitag M. Bowling the State Back in:Political Institutions and the Creation of Social Capital [J]. European Journal of Political Research,2006, Vol.45, No.1, pp.123-152
[27]Fukuyama, Francis. Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity [M]. NY:Free Press,1996
[28]Gerbing D.W., Anderson J.C. An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1988, Vol.25, No.2, pp.186-192
[29]Goodsell. A New Vision for Public Administration [J]. Public Administration Review,2006, Vol.66, No.4, pp.623-635
[30]Grootaert, C. Household Welfare, and Poverty in Indonesia [Z]. Policy Research Working Paper, the World Bank Social Development Department,1998, pp.2148
[31]Hetherington, Marc J. the Political Relevance of Trust [J]. American Political Science Review, 1998, Vol.92,pp.791-808
[32]Huemer, L. Activating Trust:The Redefinition of Roles and Relationships in an International Construction Project [J]. International Marketing Review,2004, Vol.21, No.2, pp.187-201
[33]Inglehart R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society [M]. Harvard University Press,1990
[34]Jarl K. Kampen. On the Consistency of Citizen and Municipal Level Indicators of Social Capital and Local Government Performance [J]. Soc Indic Res,2010, Vol.97, No.2, pp. 213-228
[35]Joseph S. Nye, Jr. In Government We Don't Trust [J]. Foreign Policy,1997, Vol.108, pp. 99-111
[36]Knack S., Keefer P. Institutions and Economic Performance:Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measure [J]. Economics and Politics,1995, Vol.7, pp.207～227
[37]Kramer, Gerald H. the Ecological Fallacy Revisited:Aggregate-versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections and Sociotropic Voting [J]. American Political Science Review,1983, Vol.77, pp.92-111
[38]Krishna A., Shrader E. Social Capital Assessment Tool [A].Conference Paper for Conference on Social Capital and Poverty Reduction [C]. The World Bank,1999(6)
[39]Lane Robertt E. Political Life [M]. Glencoe:Free Press,1969
[40]Lian Jiang Li. Trust in Rural China [J]. Modern China,2004, Vol.30, No.2, pp.228-258
[41]Loury Glenn C. a Dynamic Theory of Racial Income Differences [A]. In Women, Minorities, and Employment Discrimination[C]. Phvllis Wallace and Annette M. La Mond. eds. Lexington, MA:Heath,1977
[42]Lucke keele. Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government [J]. American Journal of Political Science,2007, Vol.51, No.2, pp.241-254
[43]Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust [J]. Academy of Management Review,1995, Vol.20, pp.709-734
[44]Michael Woolcock. Social Capital and Economic Development:Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework [J]. Theory and Society,1998, Vol.27, No.2, pp.151-208
[45]Miller, Arthur H. Political Issue and Trust in Government,1964-1970 [J]. American Political Science Review,1974, Vol.68, No.3, pp.951-972
[46]Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998, Vol.23, No.2, pp.242-266
[47]Nan Lin. Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action [M]. New York:Cambridge Press,2002.
[48]Nan Lin, Dumin M. Access to Occupations through Social Ties [J]. Social Networks,1991, Vol.8, pp.365-385
[49]Newton Kenneth. Social Capital and European Democracy [M]. Rutledge,1999
[50]N. Luhmann. Trust and Power [M]. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons,1979
[51]Offe, C. How can we trust our fellow citizens? [A]. In Warren M. Democracy and Trust [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1999, pp.87
[52]Pharr J. S, Putnam D. R, Dakton A. A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence [J]. Journal of Democracy,2003, Vol.11(2), pp5-25
[53]Pierre J. the Marketization of the Station [J]. Governance in a Changing Environment, ed. D. J. Savoie and B. G. Peters. Montreal:Mcgill/Queens University Press.1995.
[54]Portes Alejandro. Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration:A Conceptual Overview [A]. The Economic Sociology of Immigration:Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship. [M]. New York, Russell Sage Foundation,1995, pp.12
[55]Potapchuck W, Crocker J., Scheeter W., Boogaard, D. Building Community:Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Local Government. [M]. Washington DC, Program for Community Problem Solving,1997
[56]Prashant Kale, Harbir Singh, Howard Perlmutter. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances:Building relational capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, Vol.21, No.2, pp.17-37
[57]Putnam, Robert D. Making Democracy Work:Civil Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton [M]. Italy:Princeton University press,1993
[58]Rhys Andrews. Organizational Social Capital, Structure and Performance [J]. Human Relations,2010, Vol.63, No.5, pp.583-608
[59]Ronald Burt. Structural Holes [M]. Cambridge:Harvard University press,1992
[60]Rose R. Getting Things Done in an Antipodean Society:Social Capital Networks in Russia [M]. In Dasgupta &Serageeldin,1999
[61]Routledge B.R., Joachim von Amsberg. Social Capital and Growth [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2003, Vol.50, pp.167-193
[62]Skocpol T. Unraveling from Above [J]. The American Prospect,1996, Vol.25
[63]Stolle D. Communities of trust:social capital and public action in comparative perspective [D]. Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University,2000
[64]Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America [M]. New York:Vintage Books,1990
[65]Tullio Jappelli, Marco Pagano. the Value of Government Credit [M]. Harvard University, 1993
[66]Uphoff Norman T. Learning from Gal Oya:Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science [M]. London:Intermediate Technology Publications,1996
[67]Virginia A. Chanley, Thomas J. Rudolph and Wendy M. Rahn. the Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government:A Time Series Analysis [J]. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 2000, Vol.64, No.3, pp.239-256
[68]Wendy M. Rahn, John E. Transue. Social Trust and Value Change:The Decline of Social Capital in American Youth,1976-1995 [J]. Political Psychology,1998, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 545-565
[69]Westlund, H. Implications of Social Capital for Business, in the knowledge Economy: Theoretical Considerations [A]. International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital,2003, pp.21-36
[70]Willamson. O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism [M]. New York:Free Press,1985
[71]Wuthnow R. The United States:Bridging the Privileged and the marginalized? [A]. In Putnam. Democracies in Flux. The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society [M]. Oxford University Press,2002, pp.59-102
[72]Zucker, L. G. Production of Trust:Institutional Sources of Economic Structure,1840-1920 [C]. B. M. Straw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press,1986
[73]Zukin, Sharon and Paul DiMaggio. The Structures of Capital:The Social Organization of the Economy [M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,1990
[74][英]安东尼·吉登斯.现代性与自我认同[M].上海：三联书店,1998
[75][英]安东尼·吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].南京：译林出版社,2000
[76][英]弗里德利希·冯·哈耶克.自由与秩序原理：上册[M].邓正来译.上海：三联书店,1997：199
[77][英]约翰·洛克.政府论(下篇)[M].叶启芳、翟菊农译.北京：商务印书馆,2003
[78][英]约翰·密尔.论自由[M].程崇华译.北京：商务印书馆,1986：60
[79][美]戴维·H·罗森布鲁姆、罗伯特·s·克拉夫丘克.公共行政学：管理、政治和法律的途径[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2002
[80][美]福山.信任：社会道德与繁荣的创造[M].海口：海南出版社,2001
[81][美]克劳斯·奥弗.我们怎样才能信任我们的同胞?[A],民主与信任[C].北京：华夏出版社,2004
[82][美]马克·E.沃伦.民主与信任[M].北京：华夏出版社,2004
[83][美]文森特·奥斯特罗姆.美国公共行政的思想危机[M].上海：上海三联书店,1999
[84][美]英格尔斯.人的现代化——心理、思想、态度、行为[M].殷陆君编译.成都：四川人民出版社,1985：8
[85][法]让·雅克·卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京：商务印书馆,2003
[86][德]柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学：社会秩序与公共政策[M].韩朝华译.北京：商务印书馆,2001
[87][波]彼得·斯托姆普卡.信任：一种社会学理论[M].北京：中华书局,2005：55-68
[88][比]普里戈金,[法]斯唐热.从混沌到有序[M].曾庆宏,沈小峰译.上海：上海译文出版社,1987
[89]安贺新.关于我国政府信用问题的思考[J].中央财经大学学报,2005(3)：23-27
[90]安妮·博格.通过规制实践建立责任与信任[J].国家行政学院学报,2000(5)：8-13
[91]边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2)：23-27
[92]边燕杰.城市居民社会资本的来源及作用：网络观点与调查发现[J].中国社会科学,2004(3)：136-146
[93]蔡晶晶,李德.当代西方政府信任危机透析[J].公共管理学报,2006(4)：100-107
[94]陈柳钦.社会资本及其主要理论研究观点综述[J].东方论坛：青岛大学学报,2007(3)：84-91
[95]陈伟.“标准—普尔”政府信用等级评价体系简析[J].国际金融研究,2003(1)：47-52
[96]陈晓红,吴小瑾.中小企业社会资本的构成及其与信用水平关系的实证研究[J].管理世界,2007(1)：153-155
[97]程宏伟.地方政府信用评价指标体系构建研究[D].浙江大学,2005
[98]程倩.论政府信任关系的历史类型[M].北京：光明日报出版社,2009
[99]戴长征.腐败与反腐败：变革之中的中国面临的严峻挑战[J].中国行政管理,2004(9)：46-49
[100]迪戈·甘姆贝塔.我们能信任信任吗?[J].国外社会学,2000(3)：51
[101]董建新.政府是否是“经济人”?[J].中国行政管理,2004(3)：65-69
[102]范柏乃,龙海波.基于政府能力视角地方政府应急管理研究[J].理论与改革,2009(4)：84-87
[103]范柏乃,龙海波.我国地方政府失信形成机理与惩罚机制研究[J].浙江大学学报,2010(3)：164-173
[104]范柏乃,蓝志勇.公共管理研究与定量分析方法[M].北京：科学出版社,2008年
[105]范柏乃,金明路,程宏伟.我国地方政府信用水平的实证调查[J].行政与法,2005(1)：24-26
[106]范柏乃,张鸣.政府信用的影响因素与管理机制研究[J].浙江大学学报,2009(2)：43-52
[107]费孝通.乡土中国[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2007
[108]冯木林.我国地方政府信用的建设现状与影响因素的实证研究[D].浙江大学,2008
[109]顾新,郭耀煌,李久平.社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003(5)：44-48
[110]郭荣贵.中国社会资本变迁过程中的政府规制改革研究[D].华东师范大学,2005
[111]过勇.经济转轨、制度与腐败[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2001
[112]过勇,胡鞍钢.行政垄断、寻租与腐败——转型经济的腐败机理分析[J].经济社会体质比较,2003(2)：61-69
[113]何建华.市场秩序：从人伦信用到契约信用[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社,2008
[114]何霜梅.社群主义、服务型政府与善治[J].中央社会主义学院学报,2010(2)：78-80
[115]何水.协同治理及其在中国的实现——基于社会资本理论的分析[J].西南大学学报,2008(5)：102-106
[116]何显明.信用政府的逻辑[M].上海：学林出版社,2007
[117]“湖南政府信用建设研究”课题组.政府信用现状调查与对策分析[J].社会主义研究,2004(5)：106-108
[118]胡荣.社会资本与地方治理[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2009
[119]黄广明.首次市长支持率调查“惊世骇俗”[N].南方周末,2002-8-22
[120]黄文平.信用经济与政府责任[J].学术月刊,2002(4)：84-91
[121]句华.信用经济与政府信用的保障机制[J].社会科学辑刊,2003(1)：45-49
[122]李长江.市场经济条件下政府信用研究的重要性及政府信用模型构建[J].东南大学学报,2003(4)：55-58
[123]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安：西安交通大学出版社,2004
[124]李惠斌,杨雪冬.社会资本与社会发展[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000
[125]李六.社会资本：形成机制与作用机制研究[D].复旦大学,2010
[126]李新春.信任、忠诚与家族主义困境[J].管理世界,2002(6)：87-93
[127]李晓玉.政府信用研究综述[J].学习月刊,2006(24)：15-16
[128]李杨,王良健,欧朝敏.评价地方政府信用的方法研究[J].生产力研究,2007(7)：77-78
[129]林聚任等.社会信任和社会资本重建——当前乡村社会关系研究[M].济南：山东人民出版社,2007
[130]刘智勇.论加强政府信用建设的必要性及其实现途径[J].西南民族大学学报,2005(1)：332-334
[131]龙海波.官僚体制的基本要素解构：评《经济与社会》中“官僚体制统治”[J].中共杭州市委党校学报,2010(6)：48-53
[132]龙海波.新时期我国高校信用失范成因与形成机理探析[J].中国高教研究,2009(6)：64-65
[133]卢燕平.社会资本与我国经济和谐发展[J].统计研究,2007(10)：9-14
[134]罗家德,张绅震.信息化组织与科层组织社会资本形成因素之比较[z].台湾线上网络社会研究中心,线上出版
[135]马长山.法制进程中的“民间治理”[M].北京：法律出版社,2006：16-17
[136]马得勇,王正绪.社会资本、民主发展与政府治理——对69个国家的比较研究[J].开放时代,2009(5)：70-83
[137]马克思.资本论(第3卷)[M].北京：人民出版社,1975
[138]《马克思恩格斯全集》第46卷(上)[M].北京：人民出版社,1979：104
[139]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京：科学出版社,2002
[140]毛寿龙.政府向人大报告举债是好的开始[EB/OL].http://post.csonline.com.cn/pinglin/ shizhengpinglun/t20040301_130945.htm,2009-3-14
[141]倪星.公共权力委托-代理视角下的官员腐败研究[J].中山大学学报,2009(6)：148-157
[142]黎珍.正义与和谐——政治哲学视野中的社会资本[M].北京：人民出版社,2008
[143]潘松挺.网络关系强度与技术创新模式的耦合及其协同演化[D].浙江大学,2009
[144]荣敬本等.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京：中央编译出版社,1998
[145]阮德信.区域信用制度研究[M].南昌：江西人民出版社,2008
[146]沈海军.WTO规则下发展中国家政府信用重建的比较研究[J].江汉论坛,2003(9)：34-36
[147]沈荣华.中国地方政府学[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2006
[148]沈圆.我国地方政府信用的影响因素及其提升路径研究[D].浙江大学,2011
[149]申振东.和谐社会构建中的行政发展价值选择[J].贵州社会科学,2007(8)：4-6
[150]隋广军,盖翊中.城市社区社会资本及其测量[J].学术研究,2002(7)：21-23
[151]石本惠.现代政府信用建设研究[J].社会科学研究,2004(3)：14-18
[152]孙亚忠.政府规制、寻租与政府信用的缺失[J].理论探讨,2007(1)：23-26
[153]孙智英.加强政府信用建设的若干问题[J].东南学术,2003(2)：50-55
[154]《小康》杂志研究中心.及格线上的中国信用[EB/OL].http://news.sohu.com/s2007/ zhongguoxinyong
[155]王存河.政府信用的内涵及制度保障[J].法学评论,2004(5)：62-68
[156]王和平.论政府信用建设[J].政治学研究,2003(1)：73-77
[157]王革,陈文玲.简析政府信用理论的结构[J].天津社会科学,2007(5)：53-55
[158]王积超.社会资本及其测量的理论研究[J].西北民族大学学报,2004(2)：62-65
[159]王强.治理与社会资本问题研究[J].内蒙古民族大学学报,2007(2)：74-77
[160]王秀华,张继文,刘艳梅.政府信用评价方法初探[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(6)：30-33
[161]韦子平.刍议公务员职务消费失范及其治理[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2007(2)：40-42
[162]温伟祥.网络视角下集群企业创业导向及其与绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学,2008
[163]吴爱明,沈荣华,王立平等.服务型政府职能体系[M].北京：人民出版社,2009
[164]吴晶妹.现代信用学[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2009
[165]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务——问卷分析与应用统计[M].北京：科学出版社,2003
[166]向平.服务型政府建设中的地方政府诚信缺失及原因分析[J].社会主义研究,2007(6)：86-88
[167]徐淑芳.诚信与社会资本[J].江西社会科学,2006(12)：16-19
[168]杨璐,李家军.基于ISM模型的地方政府信用风险因素分析[J].统计与决策,2008(22)：43-45
[169]杨秋菊.政府诚信建设研究——基于政府与社会互动的视角[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2009
[170]杨瑞龙,朱春燕.网络与社会资本的经济学分析框架[J].学习与探索,2002(1)：64
[171]杨雪冬.社会资本：对一种新解释范式的探索[G]社会资本与社会发展.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000
[172]杨妍,王振亚.政治文明的生态寓意[J].山东大学学报,2010(1)：89-95
[173]杨永福.“规则”的分析与建构：制度的社会网络基础[D].武汉：武汉理工大学,2002
[174]姚明龙.信用成长环境研究[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社,2005
[175]俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000：8
[176]张成福,孟庆存.重建政府与公民的信任关系——西方国家的经验[J].国家行政学院学报,2003(3)：79-82
[177]张超,张旭升,吴元清.政府信用的社会学本质与政府信用重建：新制度主义视角[J].理论月刊,2008(7)：62-64
[178]张康之.论政府诚信以及政府的社会信用建设功能[J].理论与改革,2004(5)：15-19
[179]张克中.社会资本：中国经济转型与发展的新视角[M].北京：人民出版社,2010
[180]张其仔.社会资本论——社会资本与经济增长[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,1997
[181]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].北京：三联出版社,2001
[182]张维迎.信任及其解释：来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002(10)：59-70
[183]张暄.我国地方政府公信力的提升研究[D].南京航空航天大学,2009
[184]章延杰.政府信用论[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2007
[185]郑也夫.信任论[M].北京：中国广播电视出版社,2001
[186]周伟贤.转轨时期的地方政府信用问题分析[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2010
[187]周小虎.企业家社会资本及其对企业绩效的作用[J].安徽师范大学学报,2002(1)：1-6
[188]朱学勤.书斋里的革命[M].长春：长春出版社,1999
[189]卓成刚,乔姣.社会资本的构建与地方政府的作用[J].中国行政管理,2008(5)：84-87
[190]邹宜斌.社会资本：理论与实证研究文献综述[J].经济评论,2005(6)：120-125
[191]左昊华,林泉.寻租与腐败的运行路径与长期均衡预测——基于演化博弈的分析[J].生产力研究,2009(24)：21-23