起伏地形条件下大地电磁测深二维正反演研究及应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
自20世纪70年代以来,复杂地表条件下的地球物理场数值模拟和反演成像问题一直受到研究者和工程师们的重视。尽管到目前为止与此有关的大多数问题还没有得到彻底的解决,但是已经取得了令人瞩目的进展。就复杂地表条件下的地球物理场数值模拟与反演成像来讲,目前的状态是进展与问题并存、机遇与挑战同在。起伏地形对大地电磁测深(MT)二维数据影响很大,如果不考虑起伏地形引起的大地电磁场畸变,将使大地电磁资料产生显著误差,其解释结果必然偏离实际构造,给实测资料的解释带来了相当大的困难,因此,起伏地形影响是山区开展工作必须着重考虑的问题。只有从正演理论上正确认识起伏地形的影响,才能在野外资料处理中给出正确的解释,而对于起伏地形条件下的二维正演问题来说,电磁场没有解析表达式,需要借助数值模拟方法;为了完全消除地形效应,实现带地形的二维反演是提高资料处理解释水平唯一途径。鉴于此,本文开展“起伏地形条件下MT二维正反演研究及应用”是非常必要的,具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。
     首先,从电磁场满足的微分方程、边值问题和变分问题出发,实现了起伏地形下MT二维正演模拟的有限元计算算法。(1)研究了起伏地形的网格剖分,对传统方法进行了修正处理,从而使修正后的网格剖分更适合电磁场的分布规律;(2)讨论了大型稀疏复系数方程组的迭代解法。(3)为了验证起伏地形条件下MT二维正演算法的正确性,将二维正演模拟结果和一维正演计算的解析解进行对比,并对COMMEMI 2D-O测试模型进行了正演分析;(4)分析了山脊、山谷等起伏地形对MT响应的影响,得出了一些重要结论,为实际工作提供了理论指导作用。
     其次,以最小二乘光滑约束反演算法为基础,分析了灵敏度矩阵的求解、反演方程组的迭代解法以及正则化因子的选取问题,实现了带地形的MT二维反演成像。通过理论模型试算,两种极化模式的反演结果都能真实地反映模型的地电参数,对于低阻异常体,TE极化模式的反演结果比TM极化模式显得更为敏感。另外,联合两种极化模式的数据同时进行反演的结果更能反映出模型的地电参数。
     最后,对实测的V5-2000数据进行资料处理,分别从定性分析解释和反演定量解释两方面讨论MT的资料处理。
Since 1970s, most researchers have concentrated on numerical modeling and inversion of geophysical problem with complex geometry. So far, effort on many problems is still undergoing and some significant progress already has been made. Numerical modeling and inversion under complex situation are challenging and under development. The complex geometry brings significant impact in the magnetotelluric data, measuring at the surface. Without considering the complex geometry, sometimes it gives biased interpretation, likewise biased inverted structure and lead to difficulty in interpretation of the field data, therefore, in the fieldwork with complex fluctuation, the geometry impact should be taken into account seriously. It is import to theoretically modeling the problem with complex geometry and its impact on the modeling results, which in turn assists the interpretation of real measuring data. For 2-dimensional (2D) problem with complex geometry, no analytical solution exists, and numerical modeling is needed to solve it. The only way to eliminate the geometry effect is to fully consider the problem with geometry modeling. It is important to carry out the research of 2D forward modeling and inversion with topography either theoretically or pratically.
     Firstly, based on the electromagnetic propagation equations, boundary problem and variational problem, finite element method are used to modeling 2D MT problem with complex geometry. The work has been done as follows:(1) Correction scheme according the distribution of electromagnetic fields are proposed to the traditional grid generation; (2) Brief discussion are forwarded in the solver of large sparse matrix with complex entries; (3) 2D Modeling results are compared with 1D results for validity and modeling analysis are carried out for COMMEMI 2D-0 model; (4) Some important results are made after the modeling of the impact of geometries (e.g., ridges and valleys), which give theoretical help in practice.
     Secondly, the 2D inversion was carried out with least square method with smooth constraint, in which the calculation of sensitivity matrix and iterative solver of the inversion equations and the choice of the tradeoff parameter are analyzed. From the results, the inversion of TM and TE reflects the true geo-electrical structure and TE mode is much more sensitive to the low resistivity structure than TM mode. The hybrid inversion of both polarization data gives better interpretation for the geo-electrical structure.
     Lastly, the inversion was implemented for V5-2000 field data and discussed from the qualitative analysis interpretation and quantitative interpretation of inversion.
引文
[1]Tiknonov A N. On determining electrical characteristics of the deep layers of the earth's crust[J]. Deki Akud Nuck,1950,73(2):295-297.
    [2]Cagniard L. Basic theory of the magnetotelluric methods of geophysical prospecting[J]. Geophysics,1953,18(3):605-635.
    [3]晋光文,孔祥儒.大地电磁阻抗张量的畸变与分解[M].北京:地震出版社,2006.
    [4]徐世浙.地球物理中的有限单元法[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.
    [5]Coggon J H. Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by the finite element method[J]. Geophysics,1971,36(2):132-151.
    [6]William L, Rodi. A technique for improving the accuracy of finite element solution for magnetotelluric data[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1976, 44(2):483-506.
    [7]Rijo L. Modeling of electric and electromagnetic data[D]. Ph.D dissertation, University of Utah,1977.
    [8]Wannamaker P E, Stodt J A, Rijo L. A stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling[J]. Geophysics,1987,88(1):277-296.
    [9]Zyserman F I, Guarracino L, Santos J E. A hybridized mixed finite element domain decomposed method for two dimensional magnetotelluric modelling[J]. Earth Planets Space,1999,51(4):297-306.
    [10]Franke A, Ralph B, Klaus S.2D finite element modeling of plane-wave diffusive time-harmonic electromagnetic fields using adaptive unstructured grids[J]. Proceeding of the 17th Workshop,2004, S.2:1-6.
    [11]陈乐寿.有限元法在大地电磁测深正演计算中的应用与改进[J].石油物探,1981,20(3):84-103.
    [12]陈乐寿,孙必俊.有限元法在大地电磁测深中正演计算的改进[J].石油地球物理勘探,1982,17(3):69-72.
    [13]胡建德,王光锷,陈乐寿,等.大地电磁二维正演计算中若干问题的讨论[J].石油地球物理勘探,1982,17(6):47-55.
    [14]胡建德,蔡刚.用三角形二次插值法计算二维大地电磁测深曲线[J].石油地球物理勘探,1984,19(4):358-367.
    [15]赵生凯,徐世浙.有限单元法计算良导嵌入体的大地电磁测深曲线[J].物探化探计算技术,1983,5(1):47-55.
    [16]徐世浙,于涛,李予国,等.电导率连续变化的MT有限元正演(Ⅰ)[J].高校地质学报,1995,1(2):65-73.
    [17]李予国,徐世浙,刘斌,等.电导率连续变化的MT有限元正演(Ⅱ)[J].高校地质学报,1996,2(4):448-452.
    [18]陈小斌.有限元直接迭代算法[J].物探化探计算技术,1999,21(2):165-171.
    [19]陈小斌,张翔,胡文宝.有限元直接迭代算法在 MT 二维正演中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(4):487-496.
    [20]刘小军,王家林,于鹏.基于二次场的二维大地电磁有限元数值模拟[J].同济大学学报,2007,35(8):1113-1117.
    [21]张昆,魏文博,叶高峰.二维有限元大地电磁正演模拟在Matlab上的实现[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2008,29(5):83-88.
    [22]童孝忠.大地电磁测深有限单元法正演与混合遗传算法正则化反演研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2008.
    [23]柳建新,蒋鹏飞,童孝忠,徐凌华.不完全LU分解预处理的BICGSTAB算法在大地电磁二维正演模拟中的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,40(2):484-491.
    [24]童孝忠,柳建新,郭荣文.复杂二维/三维大地电磁的有限元正演模拟策略[J].2009,18(1):47-54.
    [25]Jones F W, Pascoe A J. Geomagnetic effects of sloping and shelving discontinuities of earth conductivity[J]. Geophysics,1971,36(1):58-66.
    [26]Brewitt-Taylor C R, Weaver J T. On the finite difference solution of two-dimensional induction problems[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1976, 47(2):375-396.
    [27]Swift C M. Theoretical magnetotelluric and Turam response from two-dimensional inhomogeneities[J]. Geophysics,1971,36(1):38-52.
    [28]Madden T R. Transmission systems and network analogies to geophysical forward and inversion problem[J]. ONR Technical Report,1972:72-83.
    [29]Mackie R L, Rieven R, Rodi W. Users manual and software documentation for two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data[M]. Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University,1997.
    [30]Zhdanov M S. The construction of effective method for electromagnetic modeling[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1982,69(3):589-607.
    [31]Zhdanov M S, Keller G V. The geoelectrical methods in geophysical exploration[M]. Methods in Geochemisty and Geophysics,1994.
    [32]de Lugao P, Portnigauine O, Zhdanov M S. Fast and stable two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data[J]. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity,1997,49():1469-1497.
    [33]Weaver J T, LeQuang B V, Fischer G A comparison of analytical and numerical results for a 2-D control model in electromagnetic induction-I. B-polarization calculations[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1985, 82(2):263-277.
    [34]Weaver J T, LeQuang B V, Fischer G. A comparison of analytical and numerical results for a 2-D control model in electromagnetic induction-II. E-polarization calculations[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1986, 87(3):917-948.
    [35]Weaver J T, Pu X H, Agarwal A K. Improved methods for solving for the magnetic field in E-polarization induction problems with fixed and staggered grids[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1996,126(2):437-446.
    [36]Prabhakar R, Ashok B. EMOD2D—a program in C++for finite difference modelling of magnetotelluric TM mode responses over 2D earth[J]. Computers and Geoscience,2006,32(9):1499-1511.
    [3]周熙襄,钟本善,江东玉.点源二维电阻率法有限差分正演计算[J].物化探电子计算技术,1983,5(3):34-38.
    [38]罗延钟,万乐.二维地形不平条件下外电场的有限差分模拟[J].物化探计算技术,1984,6(4):15-26.
    [39]李学民,曹俊兴,贺桃娥.断层构造的大地电磁响应曲线变化特征的研究[J].天然气工业,2004,24(7):42-57.
    [40]肖骑彬,赵国泽.大地电磁有限差分数值解对比[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(3):622-630.
    [41]Constable S C, Parker R L, Constable C G. Occam's inversion:a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data[J]. Geophysics,1987,52(3):289-300.
    [42]deGroot-Hedlin C, Constable S. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data[J]. Geophysics,1990, 55(12):1613-1624.
    [43]Smith J T, Booker J R. Rapid inversion of two- and three-dimensional magnetotelluric data[J]. Geophysics,1991,96(3):3905-3992.
    [44]Rodi W, Mackie R L. Nonlinear conjugate gradient algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion[J]. Geophysics,2001,66(1):174-187.
    [45]Uchida T. Smooth 2-D inversion for magnetotelluric for magnetotelluric data based on statistical criterion ABIC[J]. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity,1993,45(9):841-858.
    [46]Siripunvaraporn W, Egbert G. An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data[J]. Geophysics,2000,65(3):791-803.
    [47]deGroot-Hedlin C, Constable S. Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts[J]. Geophysics,2004,69(1):78-86.
    [48]Taeyoung Ha, Changsoo Shin. Magnetotelluric inversion via reverse time migration algorithm of seismic data[J]. Journal of Computational Physics,2007, 225(1):237-262.
    [49]严良俊,胡文宝.大地电磁测深资料的二次函数逼近非线性反演[J].地球物理学报,2004,47(5):935-940.
    [50]戴世坤,徐世浙.MT二维和三维连续介质快速反演[J].石油地球物理勘探,1997,32(3):305-317.
    [51]柳建新,童孝忠,杨晓弘,等.实数编码遗传算法在大地电磁测深二维反演中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(6):1936-1942.
    [52]吴小平,吴广耀,胡建德.二维最平缓模型的大地电磁快速反演[J].地球科学,1994,19(6):821-830.
    [53]阮百尧,徐世浙,戴世坤,等.二维大地电磁测深曲线的快速反演[J].桂林工学院学报,1998,18(1):53-56.
    [54]张大海,徐世浙.二维 MT 快速曲线对比反演方法的可行性研究[J].地震地质,2001,23(2):232-237.
    [55]刘小军,王家林,吴健生.二维大地电磁正则化共轭梯度法反演算法[J].上海地质,2007,101(1):71-74.
    [56]刘小军,王家林,陈冰,等.二维大地电磁数据的聚焦反演算法探讨[J].石汕地球物理勘探,2007,42(3):338-342.
    [57]张罗磊,于鹏,王家林,吴健生.光滑模型与尖锐边界结合的 MT 二维反演方法[J].地球物理学报,2009,52(6):1625-1632.
    [58]张罗磊,于鹏,王家林,等.二维大地电磁尖锐边界反演研究[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(3):631-637.
    [59]孙建国.复杂地表条件下地球物理场数值模拟方法评述[J].世界地质,2007,26(3):309-324.
    [60]Tessmer E, Kosloff D, Behle A. Elastic wave propagation simulation in the presence of surface topography[J]. Geophysics Journal International,1992, 108(2):621-632.
    [61]Hestholm S, Ruud B.3-D finite-difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography[J]. Geophysics,1998,63(2):613-632.
    [62]Hestholm S. Elastic wave modeling with surfaces:stability of long simulations[J]. Geophysics,2003,68(1):314-321.
    [63]Tessmer E, Kosloff D.3-D elastic modeling with surface topography by a Chebychev spectral method[J]. Geophysics,1994,59(3):464-473.
    [64]Hesthlon S, Ruud B.2D finite-difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,1994,42(5):371-390.
    [65]Ruud B, Hestholm S.2D surface topography boundary conditions in seismic wave modeling[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,2001,49(4):445-460.
    [66]韩江涛.起伏地表三维电阻率法数值模拟与分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2009.
    [67]介玉新,揭冠周,李广信.用适体坐标变换方法求解渗流[J].岩土工程学报,2004,26(1):52-56.
    [68]魏文礼,王玲玲,金忠青.曲线网格生成技术研究[J].河海大学学报,1998,26(3):93-96.
    [69]赵景霞,张叔伦,孙沛勇.曲网络伪谱法二维声波模拟[J].石油物探,2003,42(1):1-5.
    [70]揭冠周,介玉新,李广信.模拟自由面渗流的适体坐标变换方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2003,43(2):273-284.
    [71]陈伯舫,侯作中,范国华.有限差分法计算三维地形影响的电磁感应[J].地震学报,1998,20(5):541-544.
    [72]王秀明,张海澜.用于具有不规则起伏自由表面的介质中弹性波模拟的有限差分算法[J].中国科学G辑,2004,34(5):481-493.
    [73]Wannamaker P E, Stodt J A, Rijo L. Two-dimensional topographic response in magnetotellurics modeled using finite elements[J]. Geophysics,1986, 51(1):2131-2144.
    [74]Chouteau M, Bouchard K. Two-dimensional terrain correction in magnetotelluric surveys[J]. Geophysics,1988,53(6):854-862.
    [75]Baranwal V C, Franke A, Borner R U. Unstructured grid based 2D inversion of plan wave EM data for models including topography[A]. Proceedings of IAGA WG1.2 on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth,2006,S3-12:1-5
    [76]Myung Jin Nam, Hee Joon Kim, Yoonho Song.3D magnetotelluric modelling including surface topography[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,2007,55(2):277-287.
    [77]徐世浙,赵生凯.地形对大地电磁勘探的影响[J].西北地震学报,1985,7(4):69-78.
    [78]徐世浙,李予国,刘斌.大地电磁Hx型波二维地形改正的方法与效果[J].地球物理学报,1997,40(6):842-846.
    [79]晋光文,赵国泽,徐常芳,孙洁.二维倾斜地形对大地电磁资料的影响与地形校正[J].地震地质,1998,20(4):454-458.
    [80]王绪本,李永年,高永才.大地电磁测深二维地形影响及其校正方法研究[J].物探化探计算技术,1999,21(4):327-332.
    [81]陈小斌.MT二维正演计算中地形影响的研究[J].石油物探,2000,39(3):112-120.
    [82]赵广茂,李桐林,王大勇,李建平.基于二次场二维起伏地形MT有限元数值模拟[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2008,38(6):1055-1059.
    [83]李金铭.地电场与电法勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2005.
    [84]陈乐寿,刘任,王天生.大地电磁测深资料处理与解释[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989.
    [85]Barrett R, Berry M, Chan T. Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods[M]. Philadelphia:SIAM,1994.
    [86]Saad Y. Iterative method for sparse linear systems[M]. Philadelphia:SIAM, 2000.
    [87]Van D, Vorst H. Bi-CGSTAB:A fast and smoothly converging variant of BI-CG for the solution of nonsymmetrical linear systems[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing,1992,13(2):631-644.
    [88]Zhdanov M S, Varentsov I M, Weaver J T, et al. Methods for modelling electromagnetic fields results from COMMEMI—the international project on the comparison of modelling methods for electromagnetic induction[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,1997,37(3):133-271.
    [89]王家映.地球物理反演理论[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1998.
    [90]姚姚.地球物理反演基本理论与应用方法[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2002.
    [91]Tarantola A. Inverse problem thery and methods for model parameter estimation[M]. Philadelphia:SIAM,2004.
    [92]Zhadnov M S. Geophysical inverse theory and regularization[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier,2002.
    [93]Tikhonov A N, Arsenin V Y. Solution of ill-posed problems[M]. New York: Wiley,1977.
    [94]Farquharson C G, Oldenburg D W. A comparison of automatic technique for estimating the regularization parameter in non-linear inverse problems[J]. Geophysical Journal International,2004,156(3):411-425.
    [95]Jupp D L B, Vozoff K. Two-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1977,50(2):333-352.
    [96]Boerner D E, Holladay J S. Approximate Frechet derivatives in inductive electromagnetic sounding[J]. Geophysics,1990,55(2):1589-1595.
    [97]McGillivray P R, Oldenburg D W. Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem:a comparative study[J]. Geophysical Prispecting,1990,38(5):499-524.
    [98]McGilivray P R, Oldenburg D W, Ellis R G, Habashy T M. Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem[J]. Geophysics Journal International,1994,116(1):1-4.
    [99]Farquharson C G, Oldenburg D W. Approximate sensitivities for the electromagnetic inverse problem[J]. Geophysics Journal International,1996, 126(1):235-252.
    [100]de Lugao P P, Wannamaker P. Calculating the two-dimensional magnetotelluric Jacobian in finite elements using reciprocity[J]. Geophysics Journal International, 1996,127(3),806-810.
    [101]Farquharson C G. Approximate sensitivities for the multi-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems[D]. Ph.D dissertation, University of British Columbia,1995.
    [102]李学民.出大地电磁数据同时反演电阻率和磁化率参数的方法研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2005.
    [103]Pereverzev S. Morozov's discrepancy principle for Tikhonov regularization of severely ill-posed problem in finite-dimensional subspaces[J]. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization,2000,21(7):901-916.
    [104]Haber E, Oldenburg D. A GCV based method for nonlinear ill-posed problems[J]. Computational Geosciences,2000,4(1):41-63.
    [105]Hansen P C, Leary D P. The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems[J]. Society for Induction and Applied Mathematics,1993, 14(6):1487-1503.
    [106]Stando D K, Rudnicki M. Regularization parameter selection in discrete ill-posed problems—the use of the U-curve[J]. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science,2007,17(2):157-164.
    [107]Mackie R L, Madden T R. Three-dimensional magnetotellurc inversion using conjugate gradients[J]. Geophysics Journal International,1993,115():215-229.
    [108]de Lugao P P. Fast and stable two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data[D]. Ph.D dissertation, University of Utah,1997.
    [109]Newman G A, Alumbaugh D L. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients[J]. Geophysics Journal International,2000, 140():410-424.
    [110]Candansayar M E. Two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data with consecutive use of conjugate gradient and least-squares solution with singular value decomposition algorithm[J]. Geophysics Prospecting,2008,56(1): 141-157.
    [111]林昌洪,谭悍东,佟拓.大地电磁法三维共轭梯度反演研究[J].应用地球物理(英文版),2008,5(4):314-321
    [112]吴小平,徐果明.利用共轭梯度方法的电阻率三维反演研究[J].地球物理学报,2000,43(3):420-427.
    [113]崔岩,王彦飞,杨长春.带先验知识的波阻抗反演正则化方法研究[J].地球物理学报,2009,52(8):2135-2141.
    [114]刘海飞,阮百尧,柳建新.变阻尼共轭梯度算法及其性能分析[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(1):89-93.
    [115]吕玉增.地-井、井-地IP三维快速正反演研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2008.
    [116]Tuncer V, Unsworth M J, Siripunvaraporn W, Cravem J. Exploration for unconformity type uranium deposits with audio-magnetotelluric data:A case study from the McArthur River Mine Saskatchewan(Canada)[J]. Geophysics, 2006,71(6):201-209.
    [117]Swift C W. A magnetotelluric investigation of an electrical conductivity in the South Western United States[D]. Ph.D dissertation, MIT Cambridge,1967.
    [118]肖骑彬.大地电磁测深反演方法对比与可视化应用研究[D].北京:中国科学院,2004.
    [119]杨生.大地电磁测深法环境噪声抑制研究及其应用[D].长沙:中南大学,2004.
    [120]徐新学,赵宪堂,王宝勋,等.大地电磁测深常规反演方法的应用现转及紧张[A].天津华北地质勘查局科技论文集,2004.
    [121]张全胜,杨生,刘沈衡.连续电磁剖面法在石油勘探中的应用[J].资源调查与环境,2002,23(3):205-213.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700