林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制研究
|
摘要
森林认证是全球林业经营的主要模式,必须结合世界范围内的森林认证过程、发展趋势和政府推动治理的转变趋势,从发展的角度来思考未来中国林业企业森林认证的发展趋势及森林认证体系建设的方向。森林认证作为促进森林可持续经营的一种市场机制已经在世界范围内广泛开展,要使中国森林经营及林产工业的发展更好地与国际接轨,必须加快推进中国森林认证工作,完善森林可持续经营标准的指标体系。随着全球经济一体化、贸易自由化进程的加快,森林认证有利于克服林产品贸易的绿色壁垒并改善国际贸易环境,中国林业产业及林产品贸易要实现可持续健康发展,必须遵循森林资源发展规律强调经济发展与环境保护协调发展。鉴于森林认证的迅速发展以及在中国的起步态势,所以研究中国森林认证的进展与存在问题,并对林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制展开系统性研究,进一步探索提升实施森林认证动力的战略选择,具有理论与实践相结合的重要现实意义。该项研究也必将对制定以实现“提高林业生产效率和提高林业企业国际竞争力”的林业综合改革提供强有力的理论与实践指导作用。为此就中国林业发展的现实出发展开林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制研究是一个崭新而又重要的研究命题。
本文以林业国际化为研究背景,以林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制为研究主题,以森林生态经济理论、可持续发展理论、系统分析理论、非线性均衡理论、战略管理理论、核心竞争力理论为理论基础,采用重点调查法、动态模型分析法、主成分分析法、多元回归分析法、比较分析法、非均衡分析法、生态经济分析法、案例分析方法、问卷调查与半结构式访谈法等,构建林业企业实施森林认证动力机制的动态描述模型、多元回归分析模型、森林认证系统发展能力建设的合力整合描述模型、林业企业实施森林认证的成本效益量化分析模型,综合利用实地调查数据与统计数据,对林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制的成因和提升林业企业实施森林认证动力的路径选择进行较为深入的研究。
文章分为五大部分:第一部分为第一章,阐述论文研究的背景意义、相关研究观点评述、研究目标及拟解决的关键问题、本研究的方法、技术路线及内容框架;第二部分包括第二、三章,主要构建林业企业实施森林认证动力机制的动态描述模型,论证林业企业实施森林认证行为是一种全新的可持续发展模式,进一步展开林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制进行实证分析。第三部分包括第四、五章,分析林产品贸易发展对林业企业实施森林认证的基本要求,并对林产品贸易发展对林业企业实施森林认证动力推动作用的进行规范分析。着重对森林认证发展系统进行结构与功能分析,并对森林认证系统能力建设对林业企业提升实施森林认证动力的互动机理进行分析论证。第四部分包括第六、七章,主要对林业企业实施森林认证的成本效益和生态经济效应进行分析,针对福建省永安林业股份有限公司实施森林认证的行为进行案例分析;第五部分包括第八、九章,提出提升林业企业实施森林认证动力的战略选择,归纳研究结论及有待进一步研究探讨的问题。
研究的结果表明:
(1)针对林业企业实施森林认证的内在动力机制及其模型的分析表明林业企业实施森林认证的动力在于:林业企业经营者实施森林认证的决策偏好、林业企业森林生态经济效益优化目标、森林可持续经营战略与林业企业可持续发展战略的拟合度、社会周围其它林业企业实施森林认证的状况、林业企业的竞争压力、政府及林业行政管理部门对森林认证的支持力度、市场准入制度变化(林产品国际贸易壁垒)、林产品市场体系规范化制度化状态等要素之间的相互促进关系。社会周围其它林业企业实施森林认证的状况、政府及林业行政管理部门对森林认证的支持力度、市场准入制度变化(林产品国际贸易壁垒高低)、林产品市场体系规范化制度化状态对林业企业实施森林认证模式具有间接影响,通过影响其它诸要素改变林业企业实施森林认证的动力。
(2)主成分分析表明林业企业开展森林认证的影响因素归纳为四个因素,分别是:企业的基本情况;对森林认证的重视度;对森林认证的解程度和企业的经营与森林认证的关系。多元回归分析表明在森林认证的重视度方面,只要政府能够增加森林认证的重视度,例如政府能够对森林认证进行必要的支持,那么林业企业准备开展森林认证的发生比将大大增加,数据显示f 2每增加一个单位,林业企业开展森林认证的发生比将增加2.927倍;其次,对森林认证解程度上,模型的模拟发现,林业企业对森林认证的解程度和周围企业是否有准备开展森林认证直接影响到林业企业开展森林认证的发生比,数据显示的结果是f 3每增加一个单位,林业企业准备开展森林认证的发生比将增加1.758倍。
(3)通过林业企业实施森林认证与林产品贸易发展的规范分析表明未持有森林认证的代价以及持有森林认证的代价正是当前中国进行林产品贸易所面临的两难抉择,在没有考虑林产品溢价的前提下无论作出何种选择都将导致贸易利润的损失。森林认证制度的出现对维持世界林业的可持续发展无疑产生诸多正面的意义,但另一方面其又为当今国际间林产品贸易的进行提出新课题。提升林业企业实施森林认证动力与推动林产品贸易持续发展应重视规范森林认证手段改善林产品贸易环境,培育专业化的森林认证和林产品贸易人才,政府及林业部门应尽快采取积极有效的措施,开展广泛的宣传和培训活动,以提高相关林业企业和管理人员对森林认证的认识。
(4)加强森林认证系统发展能力建设必须突破认证科技支撑较弱的局面,突破认证制度和机制的缺陷,以认证科技创新为先导,认证制度能力建设为基础,认证人力资源开发与管理能力建设为重点,不断推进森林认证系统体系的优化,以提高森林认证发展系统的协调能力和持续能力。森林认证系统发展能力建设受到多方面的综合因素的影响,如森林生态环境承载能力、认证系统自我发展能力、认证系统管理调节能力,同时森林认证系统发展是一个动态的过程,在动态的发展中要受不同作用力的影响。
(5)对林业企业实施森林认证的成本效益和生态经济效应进行分析表明森林认证机构、政府及林业行政部门应加快整顿市场经济秩序,政府应该积极采取各种措施增大实行可持续开发利用森林资源的林业企业经营收益,政府应降低不合理开发利用森林资源的林业企业非法所得,林业企业实施森林认证后,在开发中必须要从全局出发,从整体上把握好森林资源开发的经济阈值和生态阈值,进一步提升林业企业实施森林认证的生态经济效应。
(6)提升林业企业实施森林认证动力的基本思路和途径是:制定和健全中国规范化的森林认证标准体系;规范森林认证手段改善林产品贸易环境;构建和培育合格的林业企业经营主体;加强林业企业森林认证能力建设;培育专业化的林产品贸易人才;进一步提升林业企业的核心竞争力。
Forest certification is the world's major forest management model. Integrating with the worldwide forest certification process, the development trend and the changing trends for government to promote the governance, we must from a development perspective consider the future of China 's forestry enterprise development trend of forest certification and forest certification system direction. As a market mechanism, forest certification to promote sustainable forest management has been extensively carried out in the world. In order to better align with the international community, China's forest management and forest product industry must accelerate the work of forest certification, and improve indicator system for sustainable forest operating standards. With the acceleration of the global economic integration and trade liberalization, forest certification has benefit to overcome the green barriers in forest products trade and improve the international trade environment. in order to achieve sustainable and healthy development, China's forestry industry and forest products trade must follow the laws of forest resources’development and emphasize the coordination between economic development and environmental protection development. In view of the rapid development of forest certification, as well as the starting situation in China, this paper studies the Chinese progress in forest certification, the existing problems and engages in systematic study on power mechanisms for forestry enterprises to implement forest certification. In addition, further explores the strategic choice to increase the power to implement the forest certification. The paper has important practical significance with the combination of theory and practice. This study is also bound to provide a strong guiding role in terms of both theory and practice for realizing the forestry comprehensive reform " to improve forestry production’s efficiency and forestry enterprises international competitiveness" ,. In all, from China's forestry development reality, it is a brand new and important subject to study power mechanism for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification.
Taking forestry internationalization as the research background and power mechanism for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification as research topic, with forest ecological economic theory, sustainable development theory, system analysis theory, the nonlinear equilibrium theory, strategic management theory, and the core competitiveness theory as the theoretical foundation, meanwhile, using the focus investigation analysis, dynamic model analysis, principal component analysis, multiple regression analysis, comparative analysis, non-equilibrium analysis, ecological economic analysis, case analysis, questionnaire survey and semi-structured interview method and so on, the paper sets up dynamic description model for power mechanism, multiple regression analysis model, integration force comprehensive description model for the capacity construction of development of forest certification system, cost-benefit quantitative analysis model of forest certification . Comprehensive utilizing of the field survey data and statistical data, the paper in depth researches on the causes of power mechanism for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification and on the path selection to promote forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification.
This paper is divided into five major parts:
The first part, that is Chapter 1, expounds on the meaning of research background, opinion review of related literature, research objectives and key issues to be resolved, the research methods, techniques and content framework.
The second part, including Chapter 2, Chapter 3, mainly creates dynamic description model for the power mechanism, argues that it be brand new sustainable development mode for enterprises to carry out certification, and further empirically analyzes the power mechanism .
The third part, that is chapter 4 and 5, analyzes the basic requirements of forestry product trade development on the enterprises’implementation of certification and gives the normal analysis on forestry product trade development’s promotion function impact on the implementation of certification. Emphasis is placed on the structural and functional analysis of the development system of forest certification. And reasons the mechanism of interaction between capability construction of certification system and power of enterprises’implementation of certification.
Part IV, including Chapters 6 & 7, analyzes the cost-benefit and eco-economic effects of forestry enterprises’forest certification. It takes Fujian Yongan Forestry Limited Company’s implementation of forest certification as a case analysis.
Part V, including Chapters 8&9, explores the strategic choice of the forestry enterprises to implement the forest certification and summarizes the conclusions and the pending questions for further discussion.
The results of the study show that:
(1) The analysis on inherent power mechanism and model indicates that the power of implementation of certification lies in: the manager’s decision preference for the implementation; the enterprise’s optimal objective for ecologic-economic benefit; the extent of coincidence between the sustainable management strategy of forestry and the sustainable development strategy of enterprises; the situation of other enterprises in certification implementation; competitive pressure of forestry enterprises; the supporting strength of government and forestry administrative departments for certification; policy changes for market admission (forestry product international trade barriers); The mutual promotion relationship of the factors in forestry product market system, such as normalization and institutionalization. The following: the situation of other enterprises in certification implementation; the supporting strength of government and forestry administrative departments for certification; policy changes for market admission(forestry product international trade barriers); normalization and institutionalization of forestry product market system ; All these have indirect impact on the certification modes, by influencing other factors to change the power for implementation.
(2) Principal component analysis shows that the reasons for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification fall into four factors, namely: the basic situation of enterprises; how much attention paid to forest certification; the level of understanding of forest certification and the relations of corporate management and forest certification. In terms of attention, multiple regression analysis shows that, as long as the government can increase the importance degrees of forest certification, such as the Government on forest certification can make the necessary support, then the forestry enterprises ready to carry out than the occurrence of forest certification will greatly increase. Data shows that f 2 each additional unit, forestry enterprises to develop forest certification will increase the occurrence of more than 2.927 times. Furthermore, the model's simulation found that the forestry enterprises‘know extent and the preparation to carry out forest certification has a direct affection of the occurrence of forest certification, that is , f 3 each additional unit, the occurrence of forestry enterprises ready to carry out the forest certification will increase more than 1.758 times.
(3) The normative analysis of the relationship between the implementation of certification and development of forestry product trade indicates that the cost of non-certification and the cost of certification is the dilemma to be faced in today’s China. Either choice will lead to the loss of trade profit unless taking account of excessive price. The emergency of certification no doubt benefits in sustainable development of world forestry, but on the other hand, new problems arise with the process of international trade. To promote international trade by increasing the power of certification, attention must be paid on: normalizing the means of certification, improving the trade environment, fostering specialized certification and forestry product trade talents. In the meantime, active measures must be taken to better the consciousness of forestry enterprises and managerial persons by publicity and training.
(4) The construction of capabilities for the development of certification system must overcome the supporting weakness in terms of technology, and overcome the shortcomings in terms of institutions and mechanism. With technology innovation as guide, construction of certification institution capabilities as base, tapping talent resources and construction of management capabilities as emphasis, constantly promote the optimization of forest certification system in order to improve the system’s coordination and sustainability. The capability construction for the development of certification system should consider several comprehensive factors, such as the carrying capacity of forest eco-environment, self-development capability of certification system, and regulating capability of certification system. In the meantime, the development of forest certification system is a dynamic process, during which subject to different impact forces.
(5) The analysis on cost-benefit and eco-economic effects of forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification shows that: the forest certification bodies, the government and the forestry administrative departments should speed up the steps to rectify market economic order; government should actively adopt various measures to increase the revenue of forestry enterprises insisting on sustainable development and utilization of forest resources; Government should reduce the irrational income from illegal exploitation and utilization of forest resources by forestry enterprises; after the implementation of forest certification, forestry enterprises should adopt an overall point of view, that is, from an overall grasp tap forest resources within economic and ecology threshold value and further enhance eco-economic effects by the enterprises’implementation of forest certification .
(6) The basic ideas of enhancing the implementation of forestry enterprises are to: develop and improve the normalization of Chinese forest certification standards; normalize the means of certification and improve forest product trade environment; build and nurture qualified forestry operating organization; strengthen the enterprises’construction for capacity for forest certification; cultivate professional talents for trade in forest products; further improve the forestry enterprises’core competitiveness.
本文以林业国际化为研究背景,以林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制为研究主题,以森林生态经济理论、可持续发展理论、系统分析理论、非线性均衡理论、战略管理理论、核心竞争力理论为理论基础,采用重点调查法、动态模型分析法、主成分分析法、多元回归分析法、比较分析法、非均衡分析法、生态经济分析法、案例分析方法、问卷调查与半结构式访谈法等,构建林业企业实施森林认证动力机制的动态描述模型、多元回归分析模型、森林认证系统发展能力建设的合力整合描述模型、林业企业实施森林认证的成本效益量化分析模型,综合利用实地调查数据与统计数据,对林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制的成因和提升林业企业实施森林认证动力的路径选择进行较为深入的研究。
文章分为五大部分:第一部分为第一章,阐述论文研究的背景意义、相关研究观点评述、研究目标及拟解决的关键问题、本研究的方法、技术路线及内容框架;第二部分包括第二、三章,主要构建林业企业实施森林认证动力机制的动态描述模型,论证林业企业实施森林认证行为是一种全新的可持续发展模式,进一步展开林业企业实施森林认证的动力机制进行实证分析。第三部分包括第四、五章,分析林产品贸易发展对林业企业实施森林认证的基本要求,并对林产品贸易发展对林业企业实施森林认证动力推动作用的进行规范分析。着重对森林认证发展系统进行结构与功能分析,并对森林认证系统能力建设对林业企业提升实施森林认证动力的互动机理进行分析论证。第四部分包括第六、七章,主要对林业企业实施森林认证的成本效益和生态经济效应进行分析,针对福建省永安林业股份有限公司实施森林认证的行为进行案例分析;第五部分包括第八、九章,提出提升林业企业实施森林认证动力的战略选择,归纳研究结论及有待进一步研究探讨的问题。
研究的结果表明:
(1)针对林业企业实施森林认证的内在动力机制及其模型的分析表明林业企业实施森林认证的动力在于:林业企业经营者实施森林认证的决策偏好、林业企业森林生态经济效益优化目标、森林可持续经营战略与林业企业可持续发展战略的拟合度、社会周围其它林业企业实施森林认证的状况、林业企业的竞争压力、政府及林业行政管理部门对森林认证的支持力度、市场准入制度变化(林产品国际贸易壁垒)、林产品市场体系规范化制度化状态等要素之间的相互促进关系。社会周围其它林业企业实施森林认证的状况、政府及林业行政管理部门对森林认证的支持力度、市场准入制度变化(林产品国际贸易壁垒高低)、林产品市场体系规范化制度化状态对林业企业实施森林认证模式具有间接影响,通过影响其它诸要素改变林业企业实施森林认证的动力。
(2)主成分分析表明林业企业开展森林认证的影响因素归纳为四个因素,分别是:企业的基本情况;对森林认证的重视度;对森林认证的解程度和企业的经营与森林认证的关系。多元回归分析表明在森林认证的重视度方面,只要政府能够增加森林认证的重视度,例如政府能够对森林认证进行必要的支持,那么林业企业准备开展森林认证的发生比将大大增加,数据显示f 2每增加一个单位,林业企业开展森林认证的发生比将增加2.927倍;其次,对森林认证解程度上,模型的模拟发现,林业企业对森林认证的解程度和周围企业是否有准备开展森林认证直接影响到林业企业开展森林认证的发生比,数据显示的结果是f 3每增加一个单位,林业企业准备开展森林认证的发生比将增加1.758倍。
(3)通过林业企业实施森林认证与林产品贸易发展的规范分析表明未持有森林认证的代价以及持有森林认证的代价正是当前中国进行林产品贸易所面临的两难抉择,在没有考虑林产品溢价的前提下无论作出何种选择都将导致贸易利润的损失。森林认证制度的出现对维持世界林业的可持续发展无疑产生诸多正面的意义,但另一方面其又为当今国际间林产品贸易的进行提出新课题。提升林业企业实施森林认证动力与推动林产品贸易持续发展应重视规范森林认证手段改善林产品贸易环境,培育专业化的森林认证和林产品贸易人才,政府及林业部门应尽快采取积极有效的措施,开展广泛的宣传和培训活动,以提高相关林业企业和管理人员对森林认证的认识。
(4)加强森林认证系统发展能力建设必须突破认证科技支撑较弱的局面,突破认证制度和机制的缺陷,以认证科技创新为先导,认证制度能力建设为基础,认证人力资源开发与管理能力建设为重点,不断推进森林认证系统体系的优化,以提高森林认证发展系统的协调能力和持续能力。森林认证系统发展能力建设受到多方面的综合因素的影响,如森林生态环境承载能力、认证系统自我发展能力、认证系统管理调节能力,同时森林认证系统发展是一个动态的过程,在动态的发展中要受不同作用力的影响。
(5)对林业企业实施森林认证的成本效益和生态经济效应进行分析表明森林认证机构、政府及林业行政部门应加快整顿市场经济秩序,政府应该积极采取各种措施增大实行可持续开发利用森林资源的林业企业经营收益,政府应降低不合理开发利用森林资源的林业企业非法所得,林业企业实施森林认证后,在开发中必须要从全局出发,从整体上把握好森林资源开发的经济阈值和生态阈值,进一步提升林业企业实施森林认证的生态经济效应。
(6)提升林业企业实施森林认证动力的基本思路和途径是:制定和健全中国规范化的森林认证标准体系;规范森林认证手段改善林产品贸易环境;构建和培育合格的林业企业经营主体;加强林业企业森林认证能力建设;培育专业化的林产品贸易人才;进一步提升林业企业的核心竞争力。
Forest certification is the world's major forest management model. Integrating with the worldwide forest certification process, the development trend and the changing trends for government to promote the governance, we must from a development perspective consider the future of China 's forestry enterprise development trend of forest certification and forest certification system direction. As a market mechanism, forest certification to promote sustainable forest management has been extensively carried out in the world. In order to better align with the international community, China's forest management and forest product industry must accelerate the work of forest certification, and improve indicator system for sustainable forest operating standards. With the acceleration of the global economic integration and trade liberalization, forest certification has benefit to overcome the green barriers in forest products trade and improve the international trade environment. in order to achieve sustainable and healthy development, China's forestry industry and forest products trade must follow the laws of forest resources’development and emphasize the coordination between economic development and environmental protection development. In view of the rapid development of forest certification, as well as the starting situation in China, this paper studies the Chinese progress in forest certification, the existing problems and engages in systematic study on power mechanisms for forestry enterprises to implement forest certification. In addition, further explores the strategic choice to increase the power to implement the forest certification. The paper has important practical significance with the combination of theory and practice. This study is also bound to provide a strong guiding role in terms of both theory and practice for realizing the forestry comprehensive reform " to improve forestry production’s efficiency and forestry enterprises international competitiveness" ,. In all, from China's forestry development reality, it is a brand new and important subject to study power mechanism for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification.
Taking forestry internationalization as the research background and power mechanism for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification as research topic, with forest ecological economic theory, sustainable development theory, system analysis theory, the nonlinear equilibrium theory, strategic management theory, and the core competitiveness theory as the theoretical foundation, meanwhile, using the focus investigation analysis, dynamic model analysis, principal component analysis, multiple regression analysis, comparative analysis, non-equilibrium analysis, ecological economic analysis, case analysis, questionnaire survey and semi-structured interview method and so on, the paper sets up dynamic description model for power mechanism, multiple regression analysis model, integration force comprehensive description model for the capacity construction of development of forest certification system, cost-benefit quantitative analysis model of forest certification . Comprehensive utilizing of the field survey data and statistical data, the paper in depth researches on the causes of power mechanism for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification and on the path selection to promote forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification.
This paper is divided into five major parts:
The first part, that is Chapter 1, expounds on the meaning of research background, opinion review of related literature, research objectives and key issues to be resolved, the research methods, techniques and content framework.
The second part, including Chapter 2, Chapter 3, mainly creates dynamic description model for the power mechanism, argues that it be brand new sustainable development mode for enterprises to carry out certification, and further empirically analyzes the power mechanism .
The third part, that is chapter 4 and 5, analyzes the basic requirements of forestry product trade development on the enterprises’implementation of certification and gives the normal analysis on forestry product trade development’s promotion function impact on the implementation of certification. Emphasis is placed on the structural and functional analysis of the development system of forest certification. And reasons the mechanism of interaction between capability construction of certification system and power of enterprises’implementation of certification.
Part IV, including Chapters 6 & 7, analyzes the cost-benefit and eco-economic effects of forestry enterprises’forest certification. It takes Fujian Yongan Forestry Limited Company’s implementation of forest certification as a case analysis.
Part V, including Chapters 8&9, explores the strategic choice of the forestry enterprises to implement the forest certification and summarizes the conclusions and the pending questions for further discussion.
The results of the study show that:
(1) The analysis on inherent power mechanism and model indicates that the power of implementation of certification lies in: the manager’s decision preference for the implementation; the enterprise’s optimal objective for ecologic-economic benefit; the extent of coincidence between the sustainable management strategy of forestry and the sustainable development strategy of enterprises; the situation of other enterprises in certification implementation; competitive pressure of forestry enterprises; the supporting strength of government and forestry administrative departments for certification; policy changes for market admission (forestry product international trade barriers); The mutual promotion relationship of the factors in forestry product market system, such as normalization and institutionalization. The following: the situation of other enterprises in certification implementation; the supporting strength of government and forestry administrative departments for certification; policy changes for market admission(forestry product international trade barriers); normalization and institutionalization of forestry product market system ; All these have indirect impact on the certification modes, by influencing other factors to change the power for implementation.
(2) Principal component analysis shows that the reasons for forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification fall into four factors, namely: the basic situation of enterprises; how much attention paid to forest certification; the level of understanding of forest certification and the relations of corporate management and forest certification. In terms of attention, multiple regression analysis shows that, as long as the government can increase the importance degrees of forest certification, such as the Government on forest certification can make the necessary support, then the forestry enterprises ready to carry out than the occurrence of forest certification will greatly increase. Data shows that f 2 each additional unit, forestry enterprises to develop forest certification will increase the occurrence of more than 2.927 times. Furthermore, the model's simulation found that the forestry enterprises‘know extent and the preparation to carry out forest certification has a direct affection of the occurrence of forest certification, that is , f 3 each additional unit, the occurrence of forestry enterprises ready to carry out the forest certification will increase more than 1.758 times.
(3) The normative analysis of the relationship between the implementation of certification and development of forestry product trade indicates that the cost of non-certification and the cost of certification is the dilemma to be faced in today’s China. Either choice will lead to the loss of trade profit unless taking account of excessive price. The emergency of certification no doubt benefits in sustainable development of world forestry, but on the other hand, new problems arise with the process of international trade. To promote international trade by increasing the power of certification, attention must be paid on: normalizing the means of certification, improving the trade environment, fostering specialized certification and forestry product trade talents. In the meantime, active measures must be taken to better the consciousness of forestry enterprises and managerial persons by publicity and training.
(4) The construction of capabilities for the development of certification system must overcome the supporting weakness in terms of technology, and overcome the shortcomings in terms of institutions and mechanism. With technology innovation as guide, construction of certification institution capabilities as base, tapping talent resources and construction of management capabilities as emphasis, constantly promote the optimization of forest certification system in order to improve the system’s coordination and sustainability. The capability construction for the development of certification system should consider several comprehensive factors, such as the carrying capacity of forest eco-environment, self-development capability of certification system, and regulating capability of certification system. In the meantime, the development of forest certification system is a dynamic process, during which subject to different impact forces.
(5) The analysis on cost-benefit and eco-economic effects of forestry enterprises’implementation of forest certification shows that: the forest certification bodies, the government and the forestry administrative departments should speed up the steps to rectify market economic order; government should actively adopt various measures to increase the revenue of forestry enterprises insisting on sustainable development and utilization of forest resources; Government should reduce the irrational income from illegal exploitation and utilization of forest resources by forestry enterprises; after the implementation of forest certification, forestry enterprises should adopt an overall point of view, that is, from an overall grasp tap forest resources within economic and ecology threshold value and further enhance eco-economic effects by the enterprises’implementation of forest certification .
(6) The basic ideas of enhancing the implementation of forestry enterprises are to: develop and improve the normalization of Chinese forest certification standards; normalize the means of certification and improve forest product trade environment; build and nurture qualified forestry operating organization; strengthen the enterprises’construction for capacity for forest certification; cultivate professional talents for trade in forest products; further improve the forestry enterprises’core competitiveness.
引文
[1][美]戴维·M·克雷普斯著.邓方译.博弈论与经济模型[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996,41—43.
[2][西].费尔南多.维加—雷东多著.毛亮,叶敏等译.经济学与博弈理论[M].上海:人民出版社,2006,381-385
[3][英]索菲·希格曼,斯迪芬·巴斯,尼尔·贾德等著.森林可持续经营手册[M].凌林,杨冬生,杨大富等译.北京:科学出版社,2001:191-192
[4]《标准化管理知识手册》编写组.标准化管理知识手册[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1987
[5]2002-2004 Edition Sustainable Forestry Initiatives (SFI) Program
[6]2010-Report of the Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study.Rome.1998
[7]American National Standards Institute. http://www.ansi.orgJpublic/iso14000
[8]Canadian Standards Association (CSA). http://www.forestworld.com/certification/ce systems/cs iso.html
[9]Crossley R. A review of global forest management certification initiatives: political and institutional aspects. Paper for the Conference on Economic, Social and Political Issues in Certification of Forest Management, Malaysia, May 12-16, 1996
[10]CSA's Sustainable Forest Management Program. http://www.certifiedwood.org
[11]Elliott , Chris and Ervin , Jamison and Gholz.Certification of Forest Products,Issues and Perspectives[M].Island Press Washington D.C.1996,296.
[12]FAO.State of the World's Forests 2001.Rome: 2001
[13]FAO. State of the World's Forests 2001.Rome: FAO, 2001.14
[14]FAO.Criteria and Indictors for Sustainable Forest Management:A Compendium,Forest
[15]FAO.Illegal activities in forestry.http://www.fao.org/forestry/index.jsp?lang=411.2005
[16]FAO.State of the world’s forest.http://www.fao.org/documents,2005
[17]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Asia-Pacific Forestry Towards.FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. http://www fscoax.org/html/1-2.htm1
[18]FSC Process Guidelines for Developing Regional Certification Standards, February 1998 (FSC document 4.2)
[19]G.J.NABUURS1 and R.SIKKEMA.INTERNATIONAL TRADE INWOOD PRODUCTS:ITS ROLE IN THE LAND USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY CARBON CYCLE[J].Climatic Change(49):377–395, 2001
[20]GOST认证. FSC在全球的森林认证工作取得长足进展[EB/OL]. http://www.gostr.org/blog/catalog.asp?date=2009-7&page=1,2009-7-20.
[21]Hicks,Michael.The Uruguay Round and Forest Products Trade.Trade Policy Article of.http://www.greenelectronics.org.tw
[22]ISO 14001:1996 Environmental management systems一specification with guidance for use
[23]ITTO .Guidelines for the Establishment and Sustainable Management of Planted Tropical Forests
[24]ITTO. ITTO. guidelines for the establishment and sustainable management of planted tropical forests.Yokohama: ITTO, 1993
[25]ITTO. Manual for the application of criteria and indicators for sustainable management of natural tropical forests (part AB). Yokohama: ITTO, 1999
[26]LARSH.,GULBRANDSEN.The Effectiveness of Non-State GovernanceSchemes: A ComparativeStudy of Forest Certification in Norway and Sweden[J].International Environmental Agreements,(2005) 5:125–149.
[27]Lu Wenming.Study on China’s Wood-based Panel Market——Outlook for the Years2000-2010.联合国粮农组织(FAO)(罗马),1998
[28]M.C.M.Eurlings and B.Gravendeel.TrnL-trnF sequence data imply paraphyly of Aquilaria and Gyrinops (Thymelaeaceae) and provide new perspectives for agarwood identification[J]. Pl.Syst.Evol.(2005).
[29]Management Working Paper,Rome,FAO,2001,132
[30]PATRICIA SHANLEY,LEDA LUZ2 and IAN R.SWINGLAND.The faint promise of a distant market: a survey ofBelém’s trade in non-timber forest products[J].Biodiversity and Conservation (11):615-636,2002
[31]PEFC Technical Document (adopted on 22 November 2002)
[32]PEFC Terms and Definitions (PEFC Technical Document Annex 1) (adopted on 22 November 2002)
[33]Sample the Power of the ISO 14001 TimeSaver CD. http://www.business-in-2l.comlfiles/whydoesitwork.html
[34]TORJUS FOLSLAND BOLKESJ,ERIK TRBORG and BIRGER SOLBERG.Increasing Forest Conservation in Norway:Consequences for Timber and Forest ProductsMarkets[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics,(2005),31:95-115
[35]United States Department of Agriculture,http://www.fas.usda.gov/
[36]ZHENG Yang-nan,JIANG Min-yuan. The Influence of forest certification on forest product trade[J].Journal of Forestry Research, 13(4): 316-318(2002)
[37]ZHENG Yang-nan,JIANG Min—yuan.The Influence of forest certification on forest product trade[J].Journal of Forestry Research, l3(4):316-318(2002)
[38]北京网.八达岭森林公园成为中国首家国际认证程度最高的生态林区[EB/OL]. http://www.bj.chinanews.com.cn/news/2006/2006-06-26/1/10417.html,2006-6-26.
[39]蔡茂森,朱少杰.论技术性贸易壁垒的抑制效应与中国出口行业的对策[J].国际木业,2003 (5).
[40]陈安.森林认证及广东林业的发展对策[J].湖南林业科技,2005,(3):78-81
[41]陈红,张婧.东北地区森林食品产业的SWOT分析[J].林业科技,2005,(6):62-65
[42]陈珂,张岩,徐斌.森林认证在中国发展的调查研究[J].林业资源管理,2007,(3):53-58.
[43]陈旭东,朱永平.浅谈森林认对证中国木制品出口的影响和对策[J].中国检验检疫,2005,(2):1
[44]戴维.贝赞可等[美].公司战略经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999,571
[45]董珂,王香奕.推动中国森林认证的对策探讨[J].林业经济,2006,(9):51-53
[46]高鸿业.西方经济学(微观部分)第四版[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:70-94.
[47]国家林业局.中国林业发展报告.2004
[48]韩哲英,陈红,门玉中.森林认证与中国林产品贸易[J].林业科技,2004,(3):53-56
[49]洪美.全球森林认证产品亚特兰大展风采[N].中国绿色时报,2002-05-16
[50]胡军.森林认证进展综述[J].重庆林业科技,2006,(4):45-48.
[51]胡小根,魏勇,徐斌,陆文明.中国森林认证关键因素分析[J].林业经济,2007,(10):64-66
[52]黄建平.西双版纳热带植物园通过IS09001和IS014001认证[N].科学时报,2003-O1-I4 (4版)
[53]黄晓玲,王灿雄,谢志忠,杨建州.林业规模经济的非线性均衡分析研究[J].技术经济,2009,(3):38-44
[54]黄晓玲,谢志忠,黄森慰,杨建州.林业企业实施森林认证动力机制的实证研究[J].技术经济,2009,(6):41-47
[55]黄晓玲,杨建州,谢志忠.森林认证制度的研究进展综述—兼论林业企业实施森林认证动力机制研究的必要性[J].中国农学通报,2009,(16):106-111
[56]霍佳,田明华,夏自谦.欧洲主要林产品生产、贸易分析及预测[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(3):31-37
[57]江泽慧.中国林产品发展的现状与前景[J].木材工业2006,(2):1-4
[58]江泽慧.中国现代林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
[59]蒋敏元,唐宏.浅析森林认证对中国相关利益主体之影响[J].中国林业企业,2005,(72);5-8
[60]蒋敏元,伊铭,李继军.推进中国森林认证的若干思考[J].林业经济问题,2003,(6):321-325
[61]蒋敏元.以生态环境建设为主的新林业发展战略研究[M].哈尔滨:北京林业大学出版社,2002.
[62]雷韶华,陈建成.浅析人民币升值对中国林产品贸易的影响[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版) 2006,(2):83-86
[63]李铁.建立科学的森林资源管理体系促进林业的可持续发展[J].延边党校学报,2005,(2):41-44
[64]李杰.中国森林可持续经营认证体系研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2004.
[65]李立华,孟令义,孟祥彬.森林认证与森林可持续经营研究[J].中国林副特产, 2006,(1):73-74
[66]李立伟.森林认证与河南林业的发展[J].林业调查规划,2006,(4):123-125
[67]李益辉.森林认证对中国经济林生产带来的挑战与机遇[J].经济林研究,1999,(2):22-25.
[68]联合国粮农组织(FAO),Forestry resource database[Z],http://www.fao.org.Aug.2001
[69]联合国粮农组织(FAO).Globe forestry report(中文)[Z],1996
[70]林风鸣.中国林产品贸易现状及其前景分析[J].中国林业.2000 (5)
[71]林凤鸣,徐芝生.日本林产品供需现状和发展趋势[J].世界林业研究,2002,(1):68-74
[72]林凤鸣.世界林产品贸易现状[J].International Wood Industry,2002,(7):4-9
[73]林凤鸣.中国木材和主要林产品的生产、消费和贸易现状及其在2010年的发展趋势[J].林业科技通讯,1999,(6):3-7
[74]刘思慧,罗明灿,刘季科,王应祥.森林认证与系统思想[J].林业经济问题,2003,(4),187-190.
[75]刘燕,田明华,李明志.森林认证产品的国际竞争力分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(3):40-44
[76]刘燕,田明华.关于森林认证本质的探讨[J].林业经济,2006,(4):32-35
[77]刘永胜.世界林木产品贸易政策趋向与中国对策研究[D].东北林业大学硕士毕业论文,2003:44-53
[78]卢授永,杨晓光.国际贸易中的绿色瓶颈制约及其对策[J].国际贸易问题.2003 (1)
[79]陆文明.森林可持续经营的认证机制及其国际进展.中国林业[J].1999(3):43-44
[80]陆文明.森林认证对森林经营和林产品贸易的影响.林业科技管理[J].2001(4):16-20
[81]吕勇,李际平.中国森林认证探讨[J].中南林业调查规划,2002,(3):6-10
[82]马传栋.论资源生态经济系统阈值与资源的可持续利用[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1995(.12):17-21.
[83]马华文.构建森林认证体系实现林业可持续发展[J].中国林业企业,2005,(75):41-44
[84]缪东玲,韩革英.中国木质林产品贸易条件分析[J].林业经济问题,2004,(5):276-279.
[85]缪东玲,张民照,党凤兰.林产品贸易与环境实证研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2004,(4):37-42
[86]缪东玲.中国林业产品进出品贸易分析及其促进林业产业发展的思考[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文,2004
[87]聂影,杨红强.政策面调整下中国林产品对外贸易走势研究[J].林业经济问题,2006,(1):44-51.
[88]钱军,颜帅.国际贸易理论与森林认证关系初论[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(2):40-43
[89]曲桂林.积极开展森林认证工作尽快与国际接轨[J].森林认证通讯,2004(1): 2-4
[90]森林认证初见成效.世界自然基金会中国网站,2004.02. 23
[91]森林认证问答.森林认证通讯. 2004 (2)
[92]森林认证相关标准[EB/OL]. http://www.cnca.gov.cn/cncait/zyxrz/spncp/slrz/43457.shtml.
[93]山世英,董继刚,杨学成.中国林业对外贸易态势评析[J].林业经济问题,2004,(6):321-325
[94]沈文星,杨红强.自由贸易体制对中国林产品贸易[J].可持续发展影响研究,绿色中国,2006,(12):47-50
[95]沈文星,杨红强.自由贸易体制对中国林产品贸易可持续发展影响研究[J].绿色中国,2006,(7):47-49
[96]施昆山,李智勇,林凤鸣等编著.中国林业发展的回顾与展望[M].中国环境科学出版社.1998年
[97]史忠良,肖四如.资源经济学[ M].北京:北京出版社,1993 :268 - 275.
[98]世界自然基金会.认证:世界森林的未来.世界自然基金会北京办事处,2000
[99]苏明.森林认证行动势在必行[J].森林认证通讯, 2004(1): 14-15
[100]孙彪,张玉磊.森林认证及其对中国林产品贸易的影响[J].防护林科技,2004,(62):42-44
[101]孙彪,张玉磊.中国林产品国际贸易现状分析及其发展对策[J].西部林业科学,2005,(2):119-121
[102]孙顶强,尹润生.全球林产品贸易格局变化及相关问题讨论[J].林业经济,2006,(5):74-80
[103]唐宏,蒋敏元.大力培育森林资源调整林产品贸易对策[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(1):49-52
[104]陶忠元.绿色壁垒的中性透析及其启示[J].国际贸易问题,2003 (9)
[105]田明华,刘燕,崔一梅.关于建立中国森林认证体系的思考[J].绿色中国,2006,(7):22-24
[106]田明华,刘燕.中国森林认证体系的影响因素分析.绿色中国,2004,(18):20-24.
[107]同济大学数学教研组.高等数学下册(第三版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1988:65-75.
[108]王森.全球林产品生产、贸易和消费格局[J].世界林业研究,2000,(5):25-32
[109]王道理,王凤霞.先进管理模式实施动力机制研究[J].商业研究,2006 ,(1):59-61.
[110]王秋菊,王立群.森林认证对中国林业产业发展的影响[J].中国林业经济, 2006,(77):42-44
[111]王松霈.自然资源利用与生态经济系统[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1992,28-35.
[112]王亚明,孙玉军,张蕾.试论中国开展森林认证工作[J].绿色中国,2004,(2):24-26.
[113]王亚明,孙玉军.森林认证的影响分析[J].森林工程,2005,(7):5-8.
[114]王亚明,张蕾,孙玉军等.森林认证在昌化林场的影响分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(2):57-61
[115]王亚明.国际森林认证体系与建立中国森林认证体系的初步研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2005.
[116]吴伟光,蒋琴儿,黄睿敏等.浙江省林产品贸易现状及其国际竞争力提升途径[J].林业经济问题(双月刊),2004,(1):6-10
[117]武刚.用控制系统的观点考察林业资源管理[J].世界林业研究,1995,(1):29-33
[118]夏自谦,董彬.世界林产品贸易状况及前景分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(1):28-32
[119]谢家禄.国际森林认证体系的比较.林业科技管理,2001,(4):8-12
[120]谢志忠,杨建洲.区域森林资源调控系统综合分析[J].林业经济问题,2004,(1):31-34
[121]谢志忠,张春霞,杨建洲,陈星.山地生物多样性资源可持续开发的生态经济分析[J].技术经济,2006,(5):6-10.
[122]徐斌,陆文明,董珂.世界森林认证:现状与挑战[J].林业科技, 2005,(5)
[123]徐斌,陆文明,刘开玲.世界森林认证体系评估与比较[J].世界林业研究,2005,(2): 11-15
[124]徐斌,赵劼，陆文明.中国森林认证发展道路之探讨[J].绿色中国,2006,(7):25-28
[125]徐斌.森林可持续经营的认证机制与中国森林认证可行性研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2000.
[126]徐方祥、管仲连.FSC国际森林认证操作指南[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
[127]徐和平,孙林岩.绿色制造模式的哲理与实施动力机制探讨[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2003 ,(9)
[128]许少洪.中国森林认证体系的研究[J].森林工程,2004,(6):1-4
[129]颜帅,宁艳杰,何晓琦.森林认证的三大基础活动[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(4):14-18
[130]杨建洲,寇文正.森林资源可持续性的内在动力机制及其模型[J].北京林业大学学报,2001,(3):94-96.
[131]杨建洲.GIS支持的区域森林资源调控方法初探[J].中国林业调查规划,1998,17,(4):1-4
[132]杨建洲.森林资源可持续性宏观调控研究[M].气象出版社,2002,(1)
[133]姚贵宝,王立海.FSC与ISO森林认证体系比较及在中国适应性研究[J].森林工程,2004,(5):1-4
[134]姚吕恬.WTO与中国林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2002 (4):115-142
[135]伊铭.森林认证地区标准——中国东北国有林区森林认证经济和社会标准研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2004.
[136]永安林业(集团)股份有限公司永林蓝豹分公司.福建永安林业(集团)股份有限公司成功获得森林认证资格[EB/OL]. http://www.chinafloor.cn/innovate/detail_NewsId-24673_Page-1.htm,2008-07-17
[137]于玲,颜帅,谢家禄.森林认证体系的内涵与基本特征[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(4):48-53.
[138]于玲.瑞典森林认证进程与启示.绿色中国,2006,(8):52-53
[139]于伸,肖生灵.森林认证与中国木材产品市场[J].森林工程,2004,(2):6-9
[140]于维生,朴正爱.博弈论及其在经济管理中的应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005,16-19,71-80.
[141]俞勇军,陆玉麟,朱东风.资源利用最优化的经济学探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境. 1999.(4):11-15.
[142]袁元.跨越“绿色壁垒”[N].望新闻周刊,2002 (17): 21-23
[143]曾燕如.挪威的森林认证[J].世界林业研究,2006,(1):70-75
[144]张淑涣.中国农业生态经济与可持续发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:159-166.
[145]张岩,徐斌,陆文明,陈珂.森林认证的动力机制与相关推动政策和措施[J].世界林业研究,2007(4):27-31.
[146]张岩等.森林认证的动力机制与相关推动政策和措施。世界林业研究,2007,20(1):27-31.
[147]郑德祥,陈平留,胡欣欣.国有林场森林经营认证标准体系探讨[J].福建林业科技,2006,(1):144-148
[148]郑仰南.WT0贸易政策对中国林产品贸易政策的影响[J].学术交流2003,(107):62-65
[149]郑仰南.绿色贸易壁垒对中国林产品出口贸易的影响及对策[J].中国林业企业,2004,(69):12-16
[150]中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组.中国可持续发展林业战略研究森林问题卷[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:164-200
[151]中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组.中国可持续发展林业战略研究战略卷[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:649-652
[152]中国软件网.成功案例--永安林业股份有限公司[EB/OL].http://www.soft6.com/solution/detail.asp?id=BABEFE, 2006-7-10.
[153]中国森林认证网.穆棱林业局:运行新型理念,推动持续经营[EB/OL]. http://www.cfcn.cn/xiang.asp?id=932
[154]周昌祥等.“变化中的国际热带林产品市场及其2010年发展趋势”国际研讨会.1998,71-81
[155]朱春全,董坷.各权益相关者在推动森林认证中的作用[J].森林认证通讯. 2002 (2)
[156]朱文吉,梁冬玲.试论森林认证及其在中国实施中将遇到的问题[J].森林工程,2002,(4):3-4
[157]朱臻,沈月琴,张晓燕.公众购买森林认证产品意愿的实证分析[J].浙江林业科技,2007,(5):32-36.
[158]庄作峰.林产品生产、消费及贸易趋势[J].世界农业,1999,(12):42-51
[2][西].费尔南多.维加—雷东多著.毛亮,叶敏等译.经济学与博弈理论[M].上海:人民出版社,2006,381-385
[3][英]索菲·希格曼,斯迪芬·巴斯,尼尔·贾德等著.森林可持续经营手册[M].凌林,杨冬生,杨大富等译.北京:科学出版社,2001:191-192
[4]《标准化管理知识手册》编写组.标准化管理知识手册[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1987
[5]2002-2004 Edition Sustainable Forestry Initiatives (SFI) Program
[6]2010-Report of the Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study.Rome.1998
[7]American National Standards Institute. http://www.ansi.orgJpublic/iso14000
[8]Canadian Standards Association (CSA). http://www.forestworld.com/certification/ce systems/cs iso.html
[9]Crossley R. A review of global forest management certification initiatives: political and institutional aspects. Paper for the Conference on Economic, Social and Political Issues in Certification of Forest Management, Malaysia, May 12-16, 1996
[10]CSA's Sustainable Forest Management Program. http://www.certifiedwood.org
[11]Elliott , Chris and Ervin , Jamison and Gholz.Certification of Forest Products,Issues and Perspectives[M].Island Press Washington D.C.1996,296.
[12]FAO.State of the World's Forests 2001.Rome: 2001
[13]FAO. State of the World's Forests 2001.Rome: FAO, 2001.14
[14]FAO.Criteria and Indictors for Sustainable Forest Management:A Compendium,Forest
[15]FAO.Illegal activities in forestry.http://www.fao.org/forestry/index.jsp?lang=411.2005
[16]FAO.State of the world’s forest.http://www.fao.org/documents,2005
[17]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Asia-Pacific Forestry Towards.FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. http://www fscoax.org/html/1-2.htm1
[18]FSC Process Guidelines for Developing Regional Certification Standards, February 1998 (FSC document 4.2)
[19]G.J.NABUURS1 and R.SIKKEMA.INTERNATIONAL TRADE INWOOD PRODUCTS:ITS ROLE IN THE LAND USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY CARBON CYCLE[J].Climatic Change(49):377–395, 2001
[20]GOST认证. FSC在全球的森林认证工作取得长足进展[EB/OL]. http://www.gostr.org/blog/catalog.asp?date=2009-7&page=1,2009-7-20.
[21]Hicks,Michael.The Uruguay Round and Forest Products Trade.Trade Policy Article of.http://www.greenelectronics.org.tw
[22]ISO 14001:1996 Environmental management systems一specification with guidance for use
[23]ITTO .Guidelines for the Establishment and Sustainable Management of Planted Tropical Forests
[24]ITTO. ITTO. guidelines for the establishment and sustainable management of planted tropical forests.Yokohama: ITTO, 1993
[25]ITTO. Manual for the application of criteria and indicators for sustainable management of natural tropical forests (part AB). Yokohama: ITTO, 1999
[26]LARSH.,GULBRANDSEN.The Effectiveness of Non-State GovernanceSchemes: A ComparativeStudy of Forest Certification in Norway and Sweden[J].International Environmental Agreements,(2005) 5:125–149.
[27]Lu Wenming.Study on China’s Wood-based Panel Market——Outlook for the Years2000-2010.联合国粮农组织(FAO)(罗马),1998
[28]M.C.M.Eurlings and B.Gravendeel.TrnL-trnF sequence data imply paraphyly of Aquilaria and Gyrinops (Thymelaeaceae) and provide new perspectives for agarwood identification[J]. Pl.Syst.Evol.(2005).
[29]Management Working Paper,Rome,FAO,2001,132
[30]PATRICIA SHANLEY,LEDA LUZ2 and IAN R.SWINGLAND.The faint promise of a distant market: a survey ofBelém’s trade in non-timber forest products[J].Biodiversity and Conservation (11):615-636,2002
[31]PEFC Technical Document (adopted on 22 November 2002)
[32]PEFC Terms and Definitions (PEFC Technical Document Annex 1) (adopted on 22 November 2002)
[33]Sample the Power of the ISO 14001 TimeSaver CD. http://www.business-in-2l.comlfiles/whydoesitwork.html
[34]TORJUS FOLSLAND BOLKESJ,ERIK TRBORG and BIRGER SOLBERG.Increasing Forest Conservation in Norway:Consequences for Timber and Forest ProductsMarkets[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics,(2005),31:95-115
[35]United States Department of Agriculture,http://www.fas.usda.gov/
[36]ZHENG Yang-nan,JIANG Min-yuan. The Influence of forest certification on forest product trade[J].Journal of Forestry Research, 13(4): 316-318(2002)
[37]ZHENG Yang-nan,JIANG Min—yuan.The Influence of forest certification on forest product trade[J].Journal of Forestry Research, l3(4):316-318(2002)
[38]北京网.八达岭森林公园成为中国首家国际认证程度最高的生态林区[EB/OL]. http://www.bj.chinanews.com.cn/news/2006/2006-06-26/1/10417.html,2006-6-26.
[39]蔡茂森,朱少杰.论技术性贸易壁垒的抑制效应与中国出口行业的对策[J].国际木业,2003 (5).
[40]陈安.森林认证及广东林业的发展对策[J].湖南林业科技,2005,(3):78-81
[41]陈红,张婧.东北地区森林食品产业的SWOT分析[J].林业科技,2005,(6):62-65
[42]陈珂,张岩,徐斌.森林认证在中国发展的调查研究[J].林业资源管理,2007,(3):53-58.
[43]陈旭东,朱永平.浅谈森林认对证中国木制品出口的影响和对策[J].中国检验检疫,2005,(2):1
[44]戴维.贝赞可等[美].公司战略经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999,571
[45]董珂,王香奕.推动中国森林认证的对策探讨[J].林业经济,2006,(9):51-53
[46]高鸿业.西方经济学(微观部分)第四版[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:70-94.
[47]国家林业局.中国林业发展报告.2004
[48]韩哲英,陈红,门玉中.森林认证与中国林产品贸易[J].林业科技,2004,(3):53-56
[49]洪美.全球森林认证产品亚特兰大展风采[N].中国绿色时报,2002-05-16
[50]胡军.森林认证进展综述[J].重庆林业科技,2006,(4):45-48.
[51]胡小根,魏勇,徐斌,陆文明.中国森林认证关键因素分析[J].林业经济,2007,(10):64-66
[52]黄建平.西双版纳热带植物园通过IS09001和IS014001认证[N].科学时报,2003-O1-I4 (4版)
[53]黄晓玲,王灿雄,谢志忠,杨建州.林业规模经济的非线性均衡分析研究[J].技术经济,2009,(3):38-44
[54]黄晓玲,谢志忠,黄森慰,杨建州.林业企业实施森林认证动力机制的实证研究[J].技术经济,2009,(6):41-47
[55]黄晓玲,杨建州,谢志忠.森林认证制度的研究进展综述—兼论林业企业实施森林认证动力机制研究的必要性[J].中国农学通报,2009,(16):106-111
[56]霍佳,田明华,夏自谦.欧洲主要林产品生产、贸易分析及预测[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(3):31-37
[57]江泽慧.中国林产品发展的现状与前景[J].木材工业2006,(2):1-4
[58]江泽慧.中国现代林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
[59]蒋敏元,唐宏.浅析森林认证对中国相关利益主体之影响[J].中国林业企业,2005,(72);5-8
[60]蒋敏元,伊铭,李继军.推进中国森林认证的若干思考[J].林业经济问题,2003,(6):321-325
[61]蒋敏元.以生态环境建设为主的新林业发展战略研究[M].哈尔滨:北京林业大学出版社,2002.
[62]雷韶华,陈建成.浅析人民币升值对中国林产品贸易的影响[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版) 2006,(2):83-86
[63]李铁.建立科学的森林资源管理体系促进林业的可持续发展[J].延边党校学报,2005,(2):41-44
[64]李杰.中国森林可持续经营认证体系研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2004.
[65]李立华,孟令义,孟祥彬.森林认证与森林可持续经营研究[J].中国林副特产, 2006,(1):73-74
[66]李立伟.森林认证与河南林业的发展[J].林业调查规划,2006,(4):123-125
[67]李益辉.森林认证对中国经济林生产带来的挑战与机遇[J].经济林研究,1999,(2):22-25.
[68]联合国粮农组织(FAO),Forestry resource database[Z],http://www.fao.org.Aug.2001
[69]联合国粮农组织(FAO).Globe forestry report(中文)[Z],1996
[70]林风鸣.中国林产品贸易现状及其前景分析[J].中国林业.2000 (5)
[71]林凤鸣,徐芝生.日本林产品供需现状和发展趋势[J].世界林业研究,2002,(1):68-74
[72]林凤鸣.世界林产品贸易现状[J].International Wood Industry,2002,(7):4-9
[73]林凤鸣.中国木材和主要林产品的生产、消费和贸易现状及其在2010年的发展趋势[J].林业科技通讯,1999,(6):3-7
[74]刘思慧,罗明灿,刘季科,王应祥.森林认证与系统思想[J].林业经济问题,2003,(4),187-190.
[75]刘燕,田明华,李明志.森林认证产品的国际竞争力分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(3):40-44
[76]刘燕,田明华.关于森林认证本质的探讨[J].林业经济,2006,(4):32-35
[77]刘永胜.世界林木产品贸易政策趋向与中国对策研究[D].东北林业大学硕士毕业论文,2003:44-53
[78]卢授永,杨晓光.国际贸易中的绿色瓶颈制约及其对策[J].国际贸易问题.2003 (1)
[79]陆文明.森林可持续经营的认证机制及其国际进展.中国林业[J].1999(3):43-44
[80]陆文明.森林认证对森林经营和林产品贸易的影响.林业科技管理[J].2001(4):16-20
[81]吕勇,李际平.中国森林认证探讨[J].中南林业调查规划,2002,(3):6-10
[82]马传栋.论资源生态经济系统阈值与资源的可持续利用[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1995(.12):17-21.
[83]马华文.构建森林认证体系实现林业可持续发展[J].中国林业企业,2005,(75):41-44
[84]缪东玲,韩革英.中国木质林产品贸易条件分析[J].林业经济问题,2004,(5):276-279.
[85]缪东玲,张民照,党凤兰.林产品贸易与环境实证研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2004,(4):37-42
[86]缪东玲.中国林业产品进出品贸易分析及其促进林业产业发展的思考[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文,2004
[87]聂影,杨红强.政策面调整下中国林产品对外贸易走势研究[J].林业经济问题,2006,(1):44-51.
[88]钱军,颜帅.国际贸易理论与森林认证关系初论[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(2):40-43
[89]曲桂林.积极开展森林认证工作尽快与国际接轨[J].森林认证通讯,2004(1): 2-4
[90]森林认证初见成效.世界自然基金会中国网站,2004.02. 23
[91]森林认证问答.森林认证通讯. 2004 (2)
[92]森林认证相关标准[EB/OL]. http://www.cnca.gov.cn/cncait/zyxrz/spncp/slrz/43457.shtml.
[93]山世英,董继刚,杨学成.中国林业对外贸易态势评析[J].林业经济问题,2004,(6):321-325
[94]沈文星,杨红强.自由贸易体制对中国林产品贸易[J].可持续发展影响研究,绿色中国,2006,(12):47-50
[95]沈文星,杨红强.自由贸易体制对中国林产品贸易可持续发展影响研究[J].绿色中国,2006,(7):47-49
[96]施昆山,李智勇,林凤鸣等编著.中国林业发展的回顾与展望[M].中国环境科学出版社.1998年
[97]史忠良,肖四如.资源经济学[ M].北京:北京出版社,1993 :268 - 275.
[98]世界自然基金会.认证:世界森林的未来.世界自然基金会北京办事处,2000
[99]苏明.森林认证行动势在必行[J].森林认证通讯, 2004(1): 14-15
[100]孙彪,张玉磊.森林认证及其对中国林产品贸易的影响[J].防护林科技,2004,(62):42-44
[101]孙彪,张玉磊.中国林产品国际贸易现状分析及其发展对策[J].西部林业科学,2005,(2):119-121
[102]孙顶强,尹润生.全球林产品贸易格局变化及相关问题讨论[J].林业经济,2006,(5):74-80
[103]唐宏,蒋敏元.大力培育森林资源调整林产品贸易对策[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(1):49-52
[104]陶忠元.绿色壁垒的中性透析及其启示[J].国际贸易问题,2003 (9)
[105]田明华,刘燕,崔一梅.关于建立中国森林认证体系的思考[J].绿色中国,2006,(7):22-24
[106]田明华,刘燕.中国森林认证体系的影响因素分析.绿色中国,2004,(18):20-24.
[107]同济大学数学教研组.高等数学下册(第三版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1988:65-75.
[108]王森.全球林产品生产、贸易和消费格局[J].世界林业研究,2000,(5):25-32
[109]王道理,王凤霞.先进管理模式实施动力机制研究[J].商业研究,2006 ,(1):59-61.
[110]王秋菊,王立群.森林认证对中国林业产业发展的影响[J].中国林业经济, 2006,(77):42-44
[111]王松霈.自然资源利用与生态经济系统[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1992,28-35.
[112]王亚明,孙玉军,张蕾.试论中国开展森林认证工作[J].绿色中国,2004,(2):24-26.
[113]王亚明,孙玉军.森林认证的影响分析[J].森林工程,2005,(7):5-8.
[114]王亚明,张蕾,孙玉军等.森林认证在昌化林场的影响分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(2):57-61
[115]王亚明.国际森林认证体系与建立中国森林认证体系的初步研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2005.
[116]吴伟光,蒋琴儿,黄睿敏等.浙江省林产品贸易现状及其国际竞争力提升途径[J].林业经济问题(双月刊),2004,(1):6-10
[117]武刚.用控制系统的观点考察林业资源管理[J].世界林业研究,1995,(1):29-33
[118]夏自谦,董彬.世界林产品贸易状况及前景分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(1):28-32
[119]谢家禄.国际森林认证体系的比较.林业科技管理,2001,(4):8-12
[120]谢志忠,杨建洲.区域森林资源调控系统综合分析[J].林业经济问题,2004,(1):31-34
[121]谢志忠,张春霞,杨建洲,陈星.山地生物多样性资源可持续开发的生态经济分析[J].技术经济,2006,(5):6-10.
[122]徐斌,陆文明,董珂.世界森林认证:现状与挑战[J].林业科技, 2005,(5)
[123]徐斌,陆文明,刘开玲.世界森林认证体系评估与比较[J].世界林业研究,2005,(2): 11-15
[124]徐斌,赵劼，陆文明.中国森林认证发展道路之探讨[J].绿色中国,2006,(7):25-28
[125]徐斌.森林可持续经营的认证机制与中国森林认证可行性研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2000.
[126]徐方祥、管仲连.FSC国际森林认证操作指南[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
[127]徐和平,孙林岩.绿色制造模式的哲理与实施动力机制探讨[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2003 ,(9)
[128]许少洪.中国森林认证体系的研究[J].森林工程,2004,(6):1-4
[129]颜帅,宁艳杰,何晓琦.森林认证的三大基础活动[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(4):14-18
[130]杨建洲,寇文正.森林资源可持续性的内在动力机制及其模型[J].北京林业大学学报,2001,(3):94-96.
[131]杨建洲.GIS支持的区域森林资源调控方法初探[J].中国林业调查规划,1998,17,(4):1-4
[132]杨建洲.森林资源可持续性宏观调控研究[M].气象出版社,2002,(1)
[133]姚贵宝,王立海.FSC与ISO森林认证体系比较及在中国适应性研究[J].森林工程,2004,(5):1-4
[134]姚吕恬.WTO与中国林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2002 (4):115-142
[135]伊铭.森林认证地区标准——中国东北国有林区森林认证经济和社会标准研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2004.
[136]永安林业(集团)股份有限公司永林蓝豹分公司.福建永安林业(集团)股份有限公司成功获得森林认证资格[EB/OL]. http://www.chinafloor.cn/innovate/detail_NewsId-24673_Page-1.htm,2008-07-17
[137]于玲,颜帅,谢家禄.森林认证体系的内涵与基本特征[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(4):48-53.
[138]于玲.瑞典森林认证进程与启示.绿色中国,2006,(8):52-53
[139]于伸,肖生灵.森林认证与中国木材产品市场[J].森林工程,2004,(2):6-9
[140]于维生,朴正爱.博弈论及其在经济管理中的应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005,16-19,71-80.
[141]俞勇军,陆玉麟,朱东风.资源利用最优化的经济学探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境. 1999.(4):11-15.
[142]袁元.跨越“绿色壁垒”[N].望新闻周刊,2002 (17): 21-23
[143]曾燕如.挪威的森林认证[J].世界林业研究,2006,(1):70-75
[144]张淑涣.中国农业生态经济与可持续发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:159-166.
[145]张岩,徐斌,陆文明,陈珂.森林认证的动力机制与相关推动政策和措施[J].世界林业研究,2007(4):27-31.
[146]张岩等.森林认证的动力机制与相关推动政策和措施。世界林业研究,2007,20(1):27-31.
[147]郑德祥,陈平留,胡欣欣.国有林场森林经营认证标准体系探讨[J].福建林业科技,2006,(1):144-148
[148]郑仰南.WT0贸易政策对中国林产品贸易政策的影响[J].学术交流2003,(107):62-65
[149]郑仰南.绿色贸易壁垒对中国林产品出口贸易的影响及对策[J].中国林业企业,2004,(69):12-16
[150]中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组.中国可持续发展林业战略研究森林问题卷[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:164-200
[151]中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组.中国可持续发展林业战略研究战略卷[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:649-652
[152]中国软件网.成功案例--永安林业股份有限公司[EB/OL].http://www.soft6.com/solution/detail.asp?id=BABEFE, 2006-7-10.
[153]中国森林认证网.穆棱林业局:运行新型理念,推动持续经营[EB/OL]. http://www.cfcn.cn/xiang.asp?id=932
[154]周昌祥等.“变化中的国际热带林产品市场及其2010年发展趋势”国际研讨会.1998,71-81
[155]朱春全,董坷.各权益相关者在推动森林认证中的作用[J].森林认证通讯. 2002 (2)
[156]朱文吉,梁冬玲.试论森林认证及其在中国实施中将遇到的问题[J].森林工程,2002,(4):3-4
[157]朱臻,沈月琴,张晓燕.公众购买森林认证产品意愿的实证分析[J].浙江林业科技,2007,(5):32-36.
[158]庄作峰.林产品生产、消费及贸易趋势[J].世界农业,1999,(12):42-51