基于本体的知识团队有效性形成机理及评价研究
|
摘要
团队随着知识经济的发展和社会分工程度的不断加深,已经成为不同组织的有效工作形式。在影响团队有效性的多种因素中,团队成员知识共享程度尤其值得关注,特别是团队知识的获取和传递问题需要解决。随着信息技术的发展,研究基于本体的知识团队有效性形成机理和有效性评价模型,将有利于整合团队内外知识资源和智力资本,推动知识的创造、传播和使用,充分发挥知识的使用价值,对提升组织技术创新能力,加速科技成果产业化将具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。
本文首先研究基于本体的知识团队有效性的理论基础,并对相关的理论进行了综述和分析,这些理论包括知识共享理论、本体理论和团队理论等理论体系,为论文研究提供了理论平台。
知识团队有效性的形成机理是本文研究的逻辑起点。在分析组织智力资源管理面临的主要问题和团队知识转移对团队有效性的影响的基础上,借鉴本体理论的相关研究成果,提出了知识团队基于本体的有效性形成模型。
团队知识领域本体的构建是本文研究的重点。首先研究了基于本体的团队知识管理框架,接着重点研究了团队知识本体构建的路径,从构建方法、术语获取及团队知识分类等角度进行了相关研究,最后探讨了知识团队本题库的结构模型。
基于本体的知识团队有效性评价是本文研究的核心。首先对知识团队有效性的评价方法进行了分析,提出了基于DEA方法的评价框架。然后结合知识团队的本体结构特征提出了知识本体有效性的评价指标体系和方法,并结合武汉地区IT行业知识团队的实践进行了案例研究。
最后,从动力环境、阻力环境和支撑环境三个维度探讨了知识团队有效性的影响要素,在此基础上,构建了知识团队有效性的支撑体系。
本文的创新点主要体现在以下几个方面：
(1)构建了团队知识领域本体。该创新点从团队知识本体的影响要素出发,分析了团队知识的本体结构,揭示了知识本体对团队有效性的作用机理,为提高知识团队有效性提供了路径指示。
(2)提出了基于本体的团队有效性评价方法和指标体系。该创新点从团队知识共享的视角出发,按照团队知识领域本体对团队投入和产出的调节作用验证了知识本体对团队有效性的影响,所得结论为实践操作提出了有益的参考。
(3)设计了基于本体的团队有效性的支撑体系模型。该模型按照增强动力、弱化阻力、强化支撑力的维度对组织内外相关的影响要素进行了系统分析,为管理实践从资源整合视角提升团队有效性做了理论上的铺垫。
Along with the development of knowledge economy and the labor degree of social division has been deepened continuously, team has become an effective working form of the different organization. The degree of knowledge-sharing team members'has become the core of the different affected factors, especially the team's gain and transmission of knowledge necessary should to be solved. With the development of information technology research, researching the knowledge team formation mechanism of the effectiveness and validity of the evaluation model based on the ontology, it was beneficial to the team integration both inside and outside the knowledge resources and intellectual capital, to promote knowledge creation, dissemination and use.This had great theoretical value and practical significance to give full play to the value of knowledge on technological innovation, to enhance the capacity of organizations to accelerate the industrialization of scientific and technological achievements.
In this dissertation, ontology-based knowledge theory of team effectiveness is the research point. Summarized the theory of knowledge sharing, ontology, team theory to provide a theoretical platform for the dissertation research.
The formation mechanism of the effectiveness of knowledge team is the logical starting point for this research.Analyzed the main problem of the management of organizational intellectual resources, and its affection on the team knowledge transfermation. On this basis, this dissertation pointed out the knowledge team effectiveness formation model based on ontology using the previous related research results.
Build the domain-ontology of team-knowledge is the focus of this dissertation. Studied the ontology-based knowledge team management framework, and then focused on constructe the path of the knowledge team ontology, including constructing methods, team knowledge acquisition and classification. At last, this dissertation pointed out the ontology structural model of knowledge team.
The evaluation of Ontology-based team knowledge of the effectiveness is the core of this dissertation. Gaving the analysis evaluation method based on the framework of DEA.Then combined with knowledge of the ontological structure of the knowledge team and made the effectiveness of ontology evaluation index system and methods, combined with industry knowledge in Wuhan IT team conducted as a case study of practice.
Finally, analysised affected factors systrmly through dynamics, risistance, supporting's demantion and constructed the supporting system of knowledge team effectiveness.
The innovation of this dissertation has three aspects:
(1)Builting a demain ontology of knowledge of the team. From researching affected factors, this innovation analyzed the ontology structure of the knowledge, and revealed the affected mechanism between the effectiveness of knowledge team, and demain ontology. It provided a path to improve the effectiveness of knowledge team instruction.
(2)Providing the team evaluation methods and index system of the knowledge team effectiveness based on ontology. This innovation from the perspective of knowledge-sharing, verified the ontology impact on effectiveness of knowledge team through the adjust effect during ontological knowledge inputs and outputs.It gave a useful guide for the practice operations.
(3)Designing the environment supported factors model. This innovation analysised affected factors through enhancing dynamics, weekening risistance, and strengthening supporting. It gave the suggestion to improve the effectiveness of knowledge team based on ontology through intergration the knowledge resources.
本文首先研究基于本体的知识团队有效性的理论基础,并对相关的理论进行了综述和分析,这些理论包括知识共享理论、本体理论和团队理论等理论体系,为论文研究提供了理论平台。
知识团队有效性的形成机理是本文研究的逻辑起点。在分析组织智力资源管理面临的主要问题和团队知识转移对团队有效性的影响的基础上,借鉴本体理论的相关研究成果,提出了知识团队基于本体的有效性形成模型。
团队知识领域本体的构建是本文研究的重点。首先研究了基于本体的团队知识管理框架,接着重点研究了团队知识本体构建的路径,从构建方法、术语获取及团队知识分类等角度进行了相关研究,最后探讨了知识团队本题库的结构模型。
基于本体的知识团队有效性评价是本文研究的核心。首先对知识团队有效性的评价方法进行了分析,提出了基于DEA方法的评价框架。然后结合知识团队的本体结构特征提出了知识本体有效性的评价指标体系和方法,并结合武汉地区IT行业知识团队的实践进行了案例研究。
最后,从动力环境、阻力环境和支撑环境三个维度探讨了知识团队有效性的影响要素,在此基础上,构建了知识团队有效性的支撑体系。
本文的创新点主要体现在以下几个方面：
(1)构建了团队知识领域本体。该创新点从团队知识本体的影响要素出发,分析了团队知识的本体结构,揭示了知识本体对团队有效性的作用机理,为提高知识团队有效性提供了路径指示。
(2)提出了基于本体的团队有效性评价方法和指标体系。该创新点从团队知识共享的视角出发,按照团队知识领域本体对团队投入和产出的调节作用验证了知识本体对团队有效性的影响,所得结论为实践操作提出了有益的参考。
(3)设计了基于本体的团队有效性的支撑体系模型。该模型按照增强动力、弱化阻力、强化支撑力的维度对组织内外相关的影响要素进行了系统分析,为管理实践从资源整合视角提升团队有效性做了理论上的铺垫。
Along with the development of knowledge economy and the labor degree of social division has been deepened continuously, team has become an effective working form of the different organization. The degree of knowledge-sharing team members'has become the core of the different affected factors, especially the team's gain and transmission of knowledge necessary should to be solved. With the development of information technology research, researching the knowledge team formation mechanism of the effectiveness and validity of the evaluation model based on the ontology, it was beneficial to the team integration both inside and outside the knowledge resources and intellectual capital, to promote knowledge creation, dissemination and use.This had great theoretical value and practical significance to give full play to the value of knowledge on technological innovation, to enhance the capacity of organizations to accelerate the industrialization of scientific and technological achievements.
In this dissertation, ontology-based knowledge theory of team effectiveness is the research point. Summarized the theory of knowledge sharing, ontology, team theory to provide a theoretical platform for the dissertation research.
The formation mechanism of the effectiveness of knowledge team is the logical starting point for this research.Analyzed the main problem of the management of organizational intellectual resources, and its affection on the team knowledge transfermation. On this basis, this dissertation pointed out the knowledge team effectiveness formation model based on ontology using the previous related research results.
Build the domain-ontology of team-knowledge is the focus of this dissertation. Studied the ontology-based knowledge team management framework, and then focused on constructe the path of the knowledge team ontology, including constructing methods, team knowledge acquisition and classification. At last, this dissertation pointed out the ontology structural model of knowledge team.
The evaluation of Ontology-based team knowledge of the effectiveness is the core of this dissertation. Gaving the analysis evaluation method based on the framework of DEA.Then combined with knowledge of the ontological structure of the knowledge team and made the effectiveness of ontology evaluation index system and methods, combined with industry knowledge in Wuhan IT team conducted as a case study of practice.
Finally, analysised affected factors systrmly through dynamics, risistance, supporting's demantion and constructed the supporting system of knowledge team effectiveness.
The innovation of this dissertation has three aspects:
(1)Builting a demain ontology of knowledge of the team. From researching affected factors, this innovation analyzed the ontology structure of the knowledge, and revealed the affected mechanism between the effectiveness of knowledge team, and demain ontology. It provided a path to improve the effectiveness of knowledge team instruction.
(2)Providing the team evaluation methods and index system of the knowledge team effectiveness based on ontology. This innovation from the perspective of knowledge-sharing, verified the ontology impact on effectiveness of knowledge team through the adjust effect during ontological knowledge inputs and outputs.It gave a useful guide for the practice operations.
(3)Designing the environment supported factors model. This innovation analysised affected factors through enhancing dynamics, weekening risistance, and strengthening supporting. It gave the suggestion to improve the effectiveness of knowledge team based on ontology through intergration the knowledge resources.
引文
[1]Lawler, E. E.,111,Mohrman, S.A., and Ledford, G. E.,Jr.Greeting high performance Organizations:Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies. San Francisco:Jossey,1995
[2]Parker, G.M,. Team players and Teamwork:The New Competitive Business Strategy, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, Inc,1990
[3]Wellins, R.S.,Byham, W.C.,and Dixon,GR.,Inside Teams.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.1994
[4]Guzzo R.A.and Dickson M.W.Teams in Organizations:Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness, Annual Review of Psychology Palo Alto,1996
[5]Inkpen, A. C,& Dinur, A..Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science,1998.9,454-468
[6]Stasser, G,D.D. Stewart and G. M. Wittenbaum. Expert Roles and Information Exchange During Discussion:The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What."Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1995.31:244-265.
[7]Salas,E.,Dickinson,TL.,Converse, SA.,TUnnenbaum SI.. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey RW, Salas E (Eds.), Teams:Their training and performance.Norwood, NJ:ABLEX,1992.3-29
[8]Salas,E., Burke,C.S.et al.. Teamwork:emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews,2000.2(4):339-356.
[9]Hackman,J.R. The design of work teams, In Lorsch J.W.(Ed.),Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall,1983.315-342.
[10]Cohen, S.G.,Ledford,G.E.,& Spreitzer,G.M. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations,1996.49(5):643-676.
[11]Cohen,S.G,& Bailey,D.E.What makes teams work:Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Mangement,1997.23(3):239-290.
[12]Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review,2001.26:356-76.
[13]McGrath,JE.,Arrow,H.,Berdahl,JL. The study of groups:past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2000.4:95-105.
[14]Ilgen,D.R.,Hollenbeck,J.R. et al. Teams in organizations:From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology,2005.56:517-543.
[15]Stewart,G..L.& Barrick,M.R. Team structure and performance:Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 2000.43:135-148.
[16]Van Der Vegt,G.,B.,Emans,B.,et al. Team members' affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management,2000.26(4): 633-655
[17]Van der Vegt, G.S.,Emans,B.J.M. et al.Patterns of interdependence in work teams:A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 2001.54(1):51-69.
[18]Wageman,R.& Baker,G. Incentives and cooperation:The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1997.18: 139-158.
[19]Gully,SM.,Incalcaterra,KA.,Joshi,A.& Beaubian,JM. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance:interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships, Journal of Applied Psychology,2002.87:819-32.
[20]Campion.M.A.,Medsker,G.J.,& Higgs,A.C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness:Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 1993.46:823-850.
[21]Campion,M.,Papper,E. et al. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology,1996.49 (2):429452.
[22]Jehn,K. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995.40(2):245-282.
[23]Simons, T.& Peterson, R. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology,2000.85:102-111.
[24]De Dreu,C.K.W.,& Weingart,L.R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction:A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003.88(4): 741-749.
[25]Lovelace,K.,Shapiro,D.L.,& Weingart,L.R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams'innovativeness and constraint adherence:A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal,2001.44:779-783.
[26]Pelled,L.H.,Eisenhardt,K.M.,& Xin,K.R. Explorying the black box:An analyses of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999.44:1-28.
[27]Jehn,KA.& Mannix,EA. The dynamic nature of conflict:A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal,2001.44(2):238-251.
[28]Marks,MA. A test of the impact of collective efficacy in routine and novel performance environments. Human Performance,1999.12:295-309.
[29]Durham,CC.,Locke,EA.,Poon,JML.,& McLeod,PL. Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, informationseeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance,2000.13:115-138.
[30]Chen,G., Webber,SS.,Bliese,PD.,Mathieu.JE.,Payne,SC.,et al. Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis. Human Performance,2002.15:381-409.
[31]Gonzalez,MG., Burke,MJ.,Santuzzi,AM.,& Bradley,JC.The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior,2003.19:629-48.
[32]Duffy,M.K.,& Shaw,J.D., The Salieri syndrome:Consequences of envy in groups. Small Group Research,2000.31:3-23.
[33]Jung,DI., Sosik, JJ.,Baik, KB. Investigating work group characteristics and performance over time:A replication and cross-cultural extension. Group Dynamics-theory Research and Practice,2002.6:153-71.
[34]Gibson,CB.August. Collective cognition in action:The formation, operation and transformation of group-efficacy beliefs in the workplace. In J. George-Falvy(Chair),Defining, measuring, and influencing group level efficacy beliefs.Symposium conducted at the 56th annual meeting of the Academy of Management,Cincinnati.OH,1996.
[35]Seers,A.,Petty,M.M.& Cashman J.F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management:A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management, 1995.20(1):18-38.
[36]Cohen, S.G.,Ledford,G.E.,& Spreitzer.G.M. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations,1996.49(5):643-676.
[37]Kim,Y.& Lee,B.R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea:A multidimensional approach. R&D Management,1995.25(2):179-196.
[38]Manz,C.C.& Stewart,G.L. Attaining flexible stability by integrating total quality management and sociotechnical systems gheory. Organization Science,1997.8:59-70.
[39]Stewart,G.L. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management,2006.32(1):29-55
[40]Langfred,C.W. Autonomy and performance in teams:The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Management,2005.31(4):513-529.
[41]Mathieu,JE.,Heffner,TS.,Goodwin,GF.,Salas,E.,&Cannon-Bowers,JA. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000.85:273-283.
[42]Klimoski,R.& Mohammed,S. Team mental model:Construct or metaphor?.Journal of Management,1994.20:403-437.
[43]Katzenbach,J.R. and Smith, D.K.. The Wisdom of Teams:Creating the High-Performance Organization. Boston, Mass:Harvard Business School Press,1993.
[44]Sundstrom, E.&M. Mclntyre, Measuring Work-Group Effectiveness:Practices, Issues, and Prospects, Working paper, Knoxville, TN:University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology,1994.
[45]李明斐,杨卫泽.项目团队有效性的影响因素界定与实现,管理工程学报,2002(3)：123-125
[46]罗伯特.K.威索基.创建有效的项目团队.电子工业出版社,2003,51,198.
[47]雷蒙德}A·诺伊,约翰·霍伦拜克,拜雷·格哈特,帕特雷克·莱特.人力资源管理：赢得竞争优势(第三版).北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001
[48]Margerrison, Chaeles and Dick McCann. Team Management:Practical New Approaches. Glucestershire, England:Management Books 2000.
[49]McGrath, J. B.Social Psychology:A Brief Introduction, New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston,1964
[50]Jewell,L. N.&Reitz, H. J.Group Effectiveness in Organizations. Illiois:Foresman and Company,1981
[51]Gladstein, D.L.Group in context:a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,1984.29.499-577.
[52]Salas,E., Dickinson,TL,Converse, SA.,TUnnenbaum SI. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey RW, Salas E (Eds.), Teams:Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ:ABLEX,1992.3-29
[53]张仓荣等.企业内项目团队效能模式之研究.中华管理评论,1998(1)：39-46
[54]常涛,廖建桥.国外团队有效性研究新进展述评,科学学与科学技术管理,2007(9)：163-169
[55]杜小勇,李曼,王大治.语义WEB与本体研究综述.计算机应用.2004,24(10)：14-16,20.
[56]王韦,黄春毅等.基于Ontology的知识检索系统的构建.现代图书情报技术,2006(4)：35-36
[57]Maedche, A.,& Staab, S.Ontology learning for the semantic web.IEEE Intelligent Systems,
2001,16(2):72-79
[58]Soo-Yeon Lim, Mu-Hee Song, Sang-Jo Lee,.Domain-specific Ontology Construction by Terminology Processing,. Journal of the Korea Information Science Society(B), Journal of the Korea Information Science Society,2004,Vol(31):353-360
[59]杨明华,钱乐秋.特定领域本体的构造方法.计算机工程,2006.6,Vol(32)：80-82
[60]Y.L. Chen, IDEF5 ontology description capture method overview, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing,1999.
[61]Mike Uschold, Martin Stuart. The Enterprise Ontology, Http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk,1996.
[62]亚瑟·W·小舍曼等.人力资源管理,东北财经大学出版社,2001
[63]刘凤华,朱欣娟.信息系统领域的本体模型研究.西安工程科技学院学报,2003.5：53-57
[64]陈凯,何克清.面向对象的本体建模研究.计算机工程与应用,2005(2)：40-43
[65]于长锐,王洪伟.基于逆向工程的领域本体开发方法.计算机应用,2006(11)：22-24
[66]Z. Xu, S.Zhang, and Y.Dong, Mapping between relational database schema and OWL ontology for deep annotation. International Conference on Web Intelligence, Hong Kong, China,2006:548-552.
[67]M. Sabou. Extracting ontologies from software documentation:A semiautomatic method and its evaluation. In Proc. Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, Spain,2004.
[68]Li, M.,Du, X.,Wang, S.:Learning Ontology from Relational Database. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics,2005, Vol(6):3410-3415
[69]刘柏嵩,高济.知识管理中基于本体的扩展检索方法.计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2006,4(18)：556-562
[70]Steier D, Huffman S,Kadlish D.Beyond full text search:AI technology to support the knowledge cycle. AAAI spring symp.Knowledge management, AAAI press,1999:161-167.
[71]David G, Dov Te'eni.Tying knowledge to action with kMail.IEEE intelligent systems, May, 2000:33-39.
[72]Davenport, T. H.,& Prusak, L. Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know.Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998.
[73](美)彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼—学习型组织的艺术与实务.上海：上海三联书店,1998.
[74]Nonaka & Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company:How Japanese Create the Dynamics of Innovation.Oxford University Press,1995
[75]Davenport, T. H.Information Ecology. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press,1997
[76]Hendriks, P. Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing.Knowledge and Process Management,1999.6(2),91-100
[77]Bart van den Hooff, Femke de Leeuw van Weenen.Committed to Share:Commitment and CMC Use as Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge and Process Management. Chichester:Jan-Mar 2004. Vol. 11.Iss.1;13-24.
[78]Hedlund, G. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation.Strategic Management Journal,1994.15(Summer Special Issue),73-90
[79]Sveiby, K.-E. The New Organizational Wealth-Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets.Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA,1997
[80]Sveiby, K.-E. A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm to Guide Strategy Formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2001.2(4):1221-1233
[81]Andrews, K. M.,& Delahaye, B.L. Influences on Knowledge Processes in Organizational Learning:The Psychological Filter. Journal of Management Studies,2000.37(6),2322-2380
[82]Stoot, K. and Walker, A. Teams, Teamwork & Teambuilding:The Manager's Complete Guide to Teams in Organizations.New York, Pretice Hall,1995
[83]Storey, J. and Quintas, P. Knowledge Management and HRM, in Storey, J. (Ed), Human Resource Management:A Critical Text, Thomson Learning, London,2001.
[84]Hoffman, M. L. Altruistic Behavior and the Parent-Child Relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1975.Vol.31(5):765-778.
[85]彭剑峰,张望军.如何激励知识型员工.中外管理,1999(8)：17-20
[86]Eric J. managers' perceptions of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management studies, 2001.38:7-8
[87]张体勤,杨明海.项目团队效能的系统运行机制及其特征研究.理论学刊,2008(4)：37-40
[88]何妍.知识团队绩效影响因素研究.文史资料,2008(8)：90-92
[89]邹波等.企业知识团队的生成及知识创新的模型与机制,科研管理,2008(3)：81-88
[90]白学军.智力心理学的研究进展.杭州：浙江人民出版社,1996.3,266-298.
[91]王前.智力资源管理的若干基本问题.公共管理学报,2004,1(2)：44-50.
[92]Shapero,Albert. Managing technical and intellectual resources-our new problems require new solutions.Business Horizons,1969(12):22-30.
[93]赵曙明.人力资源管理研究.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001.179-185,278.
[94]芮明杰.现代企业管理创新.太原：山西人民出版社,1999.123-126.
[95]乔香兰,戈凡.智力资源正在改变世界.中外管理导报,1995(1)：58-59.
[96]王前,李作学.试论智力资源管理的现实问题.科学学研究与科学技术管理,2004(10)：113-117
[97]Jeffrey pfeffer, Fighting the war for talents is Hazardous to your organization's health, organizational dynamics,2001.29(4):248-259
[98]李国杰.芯片设计带动IC产业.电子产品世界,2002(05)B,13
[99]Auyang, S Y.Foundation of Complex-system Theories, Cambridge. England:Cambridge University Press,1998
[100]Alex and David Bennet. Characterization the Next Generation Knowledge Organization. Knowledge and Innovation:Journal of the KMCI.,2000(1):8-42
[101]Alex Bennet and David Bennet, Organizational survival in the new world:the Intelligent Complex Adaptive System. Boston, MA:Butterworth Heinemann,2004.159-160
[102]王众托.知识系统工程.北京：科学出版社,2004.62-63,30-34
[103]金福,王前.知识型组织智力资源管理新论.科学学研究,2006(4)：45-49
[104](美)埃蒂纳·温格等.实践社团—学习型组织知识管理指南,北京：机械工业出版社,2003
[105]金福.知识型组织智力资源管理研究.[博士学位论文],大连理工大学,2006
[106]疏礼兵.团队内部知识转移的过程机制与影响因素研究.[博士学位论文],浙江大学,2006
[107]Albino, V., Garavelli, A. C.&Schiuma, G. Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts:the role of the leader firm.Technovation,1999.19(1):53-63
[108]Appleyard, M. M. How does knowledge flow? Interfrm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategy Management Journal,1996.17:137-154
[109]Bresman, H.,Birkinshaw, J.&Nobel, R. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions。 Journal of International Studies,1999.30(3):439-462
[110]Cummings, J.L.&Teng, B. Transferring R&D knowledge:the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2003.20: 39-68
[111]Wegner D M. Transacticve memory.theories of group behavior.In BMULLEN, G R GOETHALS (eds). A contemporary analysis of the group mind,1986.185-208
[112]张志学等.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果.心理学报,2001,38(2)：271-280
[113]B.Hollngshead. Canmunication. Learning and retrieval in transactive memory system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1998.34:423-442
[114]Moreland R L, Myaskovsky I. Exploring the performance benefits of group training, transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Humnan decision Processes,2000.82,117-133
[115]Alieakgun, John Byrne et al.knowledge networks in new, production development projects:A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management,2005.42:1105-1120
[116]Brauner E,Becker A.Beyond knowledge sharing The m anagement of transactive knowledge systems.knowledge and process Management,2006.13(1):62-71
[117]Holling Shead A B, Fraidin.S N. Gender stereotypes and assumtions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of experimental Social Psychology,2003.39,355-363
[118]纪丰伟,陈恳.并行工程中团队的组织和管理.机械,2000.27(5)：1-3
[119]谢娟娜.本体技术在知识管理系统中的应用研究[硕士学位论文].南京：南京航空航天大学,2007
[120]汪方胜等.领域本体建立的方法研究.情报科学,2005.23(2)：241-244
[121]杨秋芬,陈跃新.Ontology方法学综述.计算机应用与研究,2002(4)：5.7
[122]陈禹六.IDEF建模分析和设计方法.北京：清华大学出版社,2006
[123]陈建.领域本体的创建和应用研究.北京：对外经济贸易大学,1999
[124]杜小勇等.原型进化法：领域本体建设方法研究.中国人民大学：图书情报论坛,2005
[125]邓志鸿等.Ontology研究综述北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002.38(5)：730-738
[126]陈刚等.基于领域知识重用的虚拟领域本体构造.软件科学,2003,14(3)：10-13
[127]谢季坚,刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用.武汉：华中科技大学,2006.8
[128]盛昭瀚.DEA理论、方法和应用.北京：科学出版社,1996
[129]Zilla Sinuany-Srern, Abraham Mehrez, Yossi Hadad. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2000.7(2):109-124
[130]Talluri.S.,huq.F,.Pinney.W.E. Application of Date Envelopment Analysis for cell performance evaluation and process improvement in cellulai manufacturing. International Journal productive research,1997.35(8):2157-2170
[131]Doyle.J.R, Green.R.H. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA:Derivations meanings and uses. Journal of Operational Research,1994.45(5):567-578
[132]罗锐韧,何斌.公司再造.北京：企业管理出版社,1996：6
[133]考林斯,波拉斯.构建公司的愿景规划.哈佛商业评论,1996：9-10
[134]汪大海.变革管理.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2005[135]王婷.业务流程再造支撑体系及绩效评价研究.[博士学位论文],重庆：重庆大学,2007.9[136]陈荣耀,企业核心竞争力的文化诠释,上海师范大学学报(哲社版),2002(6)：48-49[137]江积海,牟小俐，代小春.基于模糊综合评判的企业动态组织结构的设计与重构,系统工程理论与实践.2002(7)：41-47[138]孔造杰,张海娟.企业过程再造的关键一人的因素工业工程与管理,1999(5)：41-44
[2]Parker, G.M,. Team players and Teamwork:The New Competitive Business Strategy, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, Inc,1990
[3]Wellins, R.S.,Byham, W.C.,and Dixon,GR.,Inside Teams.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.1994
[4]Guzzo R.A.and Dickson M.W.Teams in Organizations:Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness, Annual Review of Psychology Palo Alto,1996
[5]Inkpen, A. C,& Dinur, A..Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science,1998.9,454-468
[6]Stasser, G,D.D. Stewart and G. M. Wittenbaum. Expert Roles and Information Exchange During Discussion:The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What."Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1995.31:244-265.
[7]Salas,E.,Dickinson,TL.,Converse, SA.,TUnnenbaum SI.. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey RW, Salas E (Eds.), Teams:Their training and performance.Norwood, NJ:ABLEX,1992.3-29
[8]Salas,E., Burke,C.S.et al.. Teamwork:emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews,2000.2(4):339-356.
[9]Hackman,J.R. The design of work teams, In Lorsch J.W.(Ed.),Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall,1983.315-342.
[10]Cohen, S.G.,Ledford,G.E.,& Spreitzer,G.M. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations,1996.49(5):643-676.
[11]Cohen,S.G,& Bailey,D.E.What makes teams work:Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Mangement,1997.23(3):239-290.
[12]Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review,2001.26:356-76.
[13]McGrath,JE.,Arrow,H.,Berdahl,JL. The study of groups:past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2000.4:95-105.
[14]Ilgen,D.R.,Hollenbeck,J.R. et al. Teams in organizations:From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology,2005.56:517-543.
[15]Stewart,G..L.& Barrick,M.R. Team structure and performance:Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 2000.43:135-148.
[16]Van Der Vegt,G.,B.,Emans,B.,et al. Team members' affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management,2000.26(4): 633-655
[17]Van der Vegt, G.S.,Emans,B.J.M. et al.Patterns of interdependence in work teams:A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 2001.54(1):51-69.
[18]Wageman,R.& Baker,G. Incentives and cooperation:The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1997.18: 139-158.
[19]Gully,SM.,Incalcaterra,KA.,Joshi,A.& Beaubian,JM. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance:interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships, Journal of Applied Psychology,2002.87:819-32.
[20]Campion.M.A.,Medsker,G.J.,& Higgs,A.C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness:Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 1993.46:823-850.
[21]Campion,M.,Papper,E. et al. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology,1996.49 (2):429452.
[22]Jehn,K. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995.40(2):245-282.
[23]Simons, T.& Peterson, R. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology,2000.85:102-111.
[24]De Dreu,C.K.W.,& Weingart,L.R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction:A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003.88(4): 741-749.
[25]Lovelace,K.,Shapiro,D.L.,& Weingart,L.R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams'innovativeness and constraint adherence:A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal,2001.44:779-783.
[26]Pelled,L.H.,Eisenhardt,K.M.,& Xin,K.R. Explorying the black box:An analyses of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999.44:1-28.
[27]Jehn,KA.& Mannix,EA. The dynamic nature of conflict:A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal,2001.44(2):238-251.
[28]Marks,MA. A test of the impact of collective efficacy in routine and novel performance environments. Human Performance,1999.12:295-309.
[29]Durham,CC.,Locke,EA.,Poon,JML.,& McLeod,PL. Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, informationseeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance,2000.13:115-138.
[30]Chen,G., Webber,SS.,Bliese,PD.,Mathieu.JE.,Payne,SC.,et al. Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis. Human Performance,2002.15:381-409.
[31]Gonzalez,MG., Burke,MJ.,Santuzzi,AM.,& Bradley,JC.The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior,2003.19:629-48.
[32]Duffy,M.K.,& Shaw,J.D., The Salieri syndrome:Consequences of envy in groups. Small Group Research,2000.31:3-23.
[33]Jung,DI., Sosik, JJ.,Baik, KB. Investigating work group characteristics and performance over time:A replication and cross-cultural extension. Group Dynamics-theory Research and Practice,2002.6:153-71.
[34]Gibson,CB.August. Collective cognition in action:The formation, operation and transformation of group-efficacy beliefs in the workplace. In J. George-Falvy(Chair),Defining, measuring, and influencing group level efficacy beliefs.Symposium conducted at the 56th annual meeting of the Academy of Management,Cincinnati.OH,1996.
[35]Seers,A.,Petty,M.M.& Cashman J.F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management:A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management, 1995.20(1):18-38.
[36]Cohen, S.G.,Ledford,G.E.,& Spreitzer.G.M. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations,1996.49(5):643-676.
[37]Kim,Y.& Lee,B.R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea:A multidimensional approach. R&D Management,1995.25(2):179-196.
[38]Manz,C.C.& Stewart,G.L. Attaining flexible stability by integrating total quality management and sociotechnical systems gheory. Organization Science,1997.8:59-70.
[39]Stewart,G.L. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management,2006.32(1):29-55
[40]Langfred,C.W. Autonomy and performance in teams:The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Management,2005.31(4):513-529.
[41]Mathieu,JE.,Heffner,TS.,Goodwin,GF.,Salas,E.,&Cannon-Bowers,JA. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000.85:273-283.
[42]Klimoski,R.& Mohammed,S. Team mental model:Construct or metaphor?.Journal of Management,1994.20:403-437.
[43]Katzenbach,J.R. and Smith, D.K.. The Wisdom of Teams:Creating the High-Performance Organization. Boston, Mass:Harvard Business School Press,1993.
[44]Sundstrom, E.&M. Mclntyre, Measuring Work-Group Effectiveness:Practices, Issues, and Prospects, Working paper, Knoxville, TN:University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology,1994.
[45]李明斐,杨卫泽.项目团队有效性的影响因素界定与实现,管理工程学报,2002(3)：123-125
[46]罗伯特.K.威索基.创建有效的项目团队.电子工业出版社,2003,51,198.
[47]雷蒙德}A·诺伊,约翰·霍伦拜克,拜雷·格哈特,帕特雷克·莱特.人力资源管理：赢得竞争优势(第三版).北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001
[48]Margerrison, Chaeles and Dick McCann. Team Management:Practical New Approaches. Glucestershire, England:Management Books 2000.
[49]McGrath, J. B.Social Psychology:A Brief Introduction, New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston,1964
[50]Jewell,L. N.&Reitz, H. J.Group Effectiveness in Organizations. Illiois:Foresman and Company,1981
[51]Gladstein, D.L.Group in context:a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,1984.29.499-577.
[52]Salas,E., Dickinson,TL,Converse, SA.,TUnnenbaum SI. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey RW, Salas E (Eds.), Teams:Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ:ABLEX,1992.3-29
[53]张仓荣等.企业内项目团队效能模式之研究.中华管理评论,1998(1)：39-46
[54]常涛,廖建桥.国外团队有效性研究新进展述评,科学学与科学技术管理,2007(9)：163-169
[55]杜小勇,李曼,王大治.语义WEB与本体研究综述.计算机应用.2004,24(10)：14-16,20.
[56]王韦,黄春毅等.基于Ontology的知识检索系统的构建.现代图书情报技术,2006(4)：35-36
[57]Maedche, A.,& Staab, S.Ontology learning for the semantic web.IEEE Intelligent Systems,
2001,16(2):72-79
[58]Soo-Yeon Lim, Mu-Hee Song, Sang-Jo Lee,.Domain-specific Ontology Construction by Terminology Processing,. Journal of the Korea Information Science Society(B), Journal of the Korea Information Science Society,2004,Vol(31):353-360
[59]杨明华,钱乐秋.特定领域本体的构造方法.计算机工程,2006.6,Vol(32)：80-82
[60]Y.L. Chen, IDEF5 ontology description capture method overview, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing,1999.
[61]Mike Uschold, Martin Stuart. The Enterprise Ontology, Http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk,1996.
[62]亚瑟·W·小舍曼等.人力资源管理,东北财经大学出版社,2001
[63]刘凤华,朱欣娟.信息系统领域的本体模型研究.西安工程科技学院学报,2003.5：53-57
[64]陈凯,何克清.面向对象的本体建模研究.计算机工程与应用,2005(2)：40-43
[65]于长锐,王洪伟.基于逆向工程的领域本体开发方法.计算机应用,2006(11)：22-24
[66]Z. Xu, S.Zhang, and Y.Dong, Mapping between relational database schema and OWL ontology for deep annotation. International Conference on Web Intelligence, Hong Kong, China,2006:548-552.
[67]M. Sabou. Extracting ontologies from software documentation:A semiautomatic method and its evaluation. In Proc. Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, Spain,2004.
[68]Li, M.,Du, X.,Wang, S.:Learning Ontology from Relational Database. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics,2005, Vol(6):3410-3415
[69]刘柏嵩,高济.知识管理中基于本体的扩展检索方法.计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2006,4(18)：556-562
[70]Steier D, Huffman S,Kadlish D.Beyond full text search:AI technology to support the knowledge cycle. AAAI spring symp.Knowledge management, AAAI press,1999:161-167.
[71]David G, Dov Te'eni.Tying knowledge to action with kMail.IEEE intelligent systems, May, 2000:33-39.
[72]Davenport, T. H.,& Prusak, L. Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know.Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998.
[73](美)彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼—学习型组织的艺术与实务.上海：上海三联书店,1998.
[74]Nonaka & Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company:How Japanese Create the Dynamics of Innovation.Oxford University Press,1995
[75]Davenport, T. H.Information Ecology. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press,1997
[76]Hendriks, P. Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing.Knowledge and Process Management,1999.6(2),91-100
[77]Bart van den Hooff, Femke de Leeuw van Weenen.Committed to Share:Commitment and CMC Use as Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge and Process Management. Chichester:Jan-Mar 2004. Vol. 11.Iss.1;13-24.
[78]Hedlund, G. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation.Strategic Management Journal,1994.15(Summer Special Issue),73-90
[79]Sveiby, K.-E. The New Organizational Wealth-Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets.Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA,1997
[80]Sveiby, K.-E. A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm to Guide Strategy Formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2001.2(4):1221-1233
[81]Andrews, K. M.,& Delahaye, B.L. Influences on Knowledge Processes in Organizational Learning:The Psychological Filter. Journal of Management Studies,2000.37(6),2322-2380
[82]Stoot, K. and Walker, A. Teams, Teamwork & Teambuilding:The Manager's Complete Guide to Teams in Organizations.New York, Pretice Hall,1995
[83]Storey, J. and Quintas, P. Knowledge Management and HRM, in Storey, J. (Ed), Human Resource Management:A Critical Text, Thomson Learning, London,2001.
[84]Hoffman, M. L. Altruistic Behavior and the Parent-Child Relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1975.Vol.31(5):765-778.
[85]彭剑峰,张望军.如何激励知识型员工.中外管理,1999(8)：17-20
[86]Eric J. managers' perceptions of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management studies, 2001.38:7-8
[87]张体勤,杨明海.项目团队效能的系统运行机制及其特征研究.理论学刊,2008(4)：37-40
[88]何妍.知识团队绩效影响因素研究.文史资料,2008(8)：90-92
[89]邹波等.企业知识团队的生成及知识创新的模型与机制,科研管理,2008(3)：81-88
[90]白学军.智力心理学的研究进展.杭州：浙江人民出版社,1996.3,266-298.
[91]王前.智力资源管理的若干基本问题.公共管理学报,2004,1(2)：44-50.
[92]Shapero,Albert. Managing technical and intellectual resources-our new problems require new solutions.Business Horizons,1969(12):22-30.
[93]赵曙明.人力资源管理研究.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001.179-185,278.
[94]芮明杰.现代企业管理创新.太原：山西人民出版社,1999.123-126.
[95]乔香兰,戈凡.智力资源正在改变世界.中外管理导报,1995(1)：58-59.
[96]王前,李作学.试论智力资源管理的现实问题.科学学研究与科学技术管理,2004(10)：113-117
[97]Jeffrey pfeffer, Fighting the war for talents is Hazardous to your organization's health, organizational dynamics,2001.29(4):248-259
[98]李国杰.芯片设计带动IC产业.电子产品世界,2002(05)B,13
[99]Auyang, S Y.Foundation of Complex-system Theories, Cambridge. England:Cambridge University Press,1998
[100]Alex and David Bennet. Characterization the Next Generation Knowledge Organization. Knowledge and Innovation:Journal of the KMCI.,2000(1):8-42
[101]Alex Bennet and David Bennet, Organizational survival in the new world:the Intelligent Complex Adaptive System. Boston, MA:Butterworth Heinemann,2004.159-160
[102]王众托.知识系统工程.北京：科学出版社,2004.62-63,30-34
[103]金福,王前.知识型组织智力资源管理新论.科学学研究,2006(4)：45-49
[104](美)埃蒂纳·温格等.实践社团—学习型组织知识管理指南,北京：机械工业出版社,2003
[105]金福.知识型组织智力资源管理研究.[博士学位论文],大连理工大学,2006
[106]疏礼兵.团队内部知识转移的过程机制与影响因素研究.[博士学位论文],浙江大学,2006
[107]Albino, V., Garavelli, A. C.&Schiuma, G. Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts:the role of the leader firm.Technovation,1999.19(1):53-63
[108]Appleyard, M. M. How does knowledge flow? Interfrm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategy Management Journal,1996.17:137-154
[109]Bresman, H.,Birkinshaw, J.&Nobel, R. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions。 Journal of International Studies,1999.30(3):439-462
[110]Cummings, J.L.&Teng, B. Transferring R&D knowledge:the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2003.20: 39-68
[111]Wegner D M. Transacticve memory.theories of group behavior.In BMULLEN, G R GOETHALS (eds). A contemporary analysis of the group mind,1986.185-208
[112]张志学等.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果.心理学报,2001,38(2)：271-280
[113]B.Hollngshead. Canmunication. Learning and retrieval in transactive memory system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1998.34:423-442
[114]Moreland R L, Myaskovsky I. Exploring the performance benefits of group training, transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Humnan decision Processes,2000.82,117-133
[115]Alieakgun, John Byrne et al.knowledge networks in new, production development projects:A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management,2005.42:1105-1120
[116]Brauner E,Becker A.Beyond knowledge sharing The m anagement of transactive knowledge systems.knowledge and process Management,2006.13(1):62-71
[117]Holling Shead A B, Fraidin.S N. Gender stereotypes and assumtions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of experimental Social Psychology,2003.39,355-363
[118]纪丰伟,陈恳.并行工程中团队的组织和管理.机械,2000.27(5)：1-3
[119]谢娟娜.本体技术在知识管理系统中的应用研究[硕士学位论文].南京：南京航空航天大学,2007
[120]汪方胜等.领域本体建立的方法研究.情报科学,2005.23(2)：241-244
[121]杨秋芬,陈跃新.Ontology方法学综述.计算机应用与研究,2002(4)：5.7
[122]陈禹六.IDEF建模分析和设计方法.北京：清华大学出版社,2006
[123]陈建.领域本体的创建和应用研究.北京：对外经济贸易大学,1999
[124]杜小勇等.原型进化法：领域本体建设方法研究.中国人民大学：图书情报论坛,2005
[125]邓志鸿等.Ontology研究综述北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002.38(5)：730-738
[126]陈刚等.基于领域知识重用的虚拟领域本体构造.软件科学,2003,14(3)：10-13
[127]谢季坚,刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用.武汉：华中科技大学,2006.8
[128]盛昭瀚.DEA理论、方法和应用.北京：科学出版社,1996
[129]Zilla Sinuany-Srern, Abraham Mehrez, Yossi Hadad. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2000.7(2):109-124
[130]Talluri.S.,huq.F,.Pinney.W.E. Application of Date Envelopment Analysis for cell performance evaluation and process improvement in cellulai manufacturing. International Journal productive research,1997.35(8):2157-2170
[131]Doyle.J.R, Green.R.H. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA:Derivations meanings and uses. Journal of Operational Research,1994.45(5):567-578
[132]罗锐韧,何斌.公司再造.北京：企业管理出版社,1996：6
[133]考林斯,波拉斯.构建公司的愿景规划.哈佛商业评论,1996：9-10
[134]汪大海.变革管理.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2005[135]王婷.业务流程再造支撑体系及绩效评价研究.[博士学位论文],重庆：重庆大学,2007.9[136]陈荣耀,企业核心竞争力的文化诠释,上海师范大学学报(哲社版),2002(6)：48-49[137]江积海,牟小俐，代小春.基于模糊综合评判的企业动态组织结构的设计与重构,系统工程理论与实践.2002(7)：41-47[138]孔造杰,张海娟.企业过程再造的关键一人的因素工业工程与管理,1999(5)：41-44