论交通肇事罪
摘要
本文对交通肇事罪作了系统论述。文章共分四大部分：
第一部分：交通肇事罪的理论发展与立法演变。本部分从纵向阐述了新中国成立后关于交通肇事罪的理论发展与立法演变过程，针对我国现行刑法规定的内容及相关的司法解释，提出了进一步研究的必要性。
第二部分：交通肇事罪的概念及特征。本部分从主体方面、主观方面、客观方面、客体方面对交通肇事罪的特征进行了论述。在主体方面，主要论证了驾驶非机动车辆、人力船舶的行为人和车辆主管人员(所有人、承包人)、行人、乘车人能够成为交通肇事罪主体的理由。主观方面，论证了交通肇事行为人主观上的两种过失情形即疏忽大意的过失和过于自信的过失，对怎样判断行为人的预见能力、过失犯罪中行为人的注意义务问题进行了探讨，并对国外的“相互信赖”原则进行了评价。客观方面，论述了交通肇事罪客观上的四个构成要件和交通事故发生的范围问题。在客体方面，指出了交通肇事罪侵犯的客体是交通运输安全。
第三部分：交通肇事罪的司法认定。本部分从交通肇事罪罪与非罪的区分、交通肇事罪与其他近似罪的区分、交通肇事罪共犯的认定、交通事故责任的认定、交通肇事罪的责任分担等方面进行了探讨，指出了在司法实践中存在的问题，并提出了自己的看法。
第四部分：交通肇事罪的刑罚适用。对交通肇事罪的三个量刑单位进行了论述，主要对怎样认定“交通肇事后逃逸”和“因逃逸致人死亡”两个问题进行了探讨。最后，提出了交通肇事罪在刑罚规定方面存在的立法缺陷。
The text causes trouble to offenses against traffic laws made the scheme discusses. The article is divided into four greatest components totally:
Part I : The traffic causes trouble the school of the sin rolls to turn into with legislative. This component from expatiated new China the concerning traffic lengthways to cause trouble after establishing the school of the sin roll to turn into with legislative. Ultimately, aim at contents and relevant judicial interpretations of the current penal provision in our country, adduce the necessity of the further study.
Part II: The traffic causes trouble notion and habits of the sin. This component caused trouble the habit of the sin to the traffic to proceed the treatise from the corpus aspect, subjective aspect, objective aspects, object. In the aspects of corpus, argumentum driving not the person of the motor vehicle, manpower ship and the personnel of car head( exercitor, contract for the body), pedestrian, go by car the body can become the re of the traffic cause trouble sin corpus. Subjective aspect, argumentum the traffic cause trouble abearance is human two kind negligence circumstance scilicet the negligence of the fault the gist and overconfident negligence, versus judge the human foresight in abearance ability, criminal negligence the inside how the human diligentia in abearance onus problem adduced own notion, combining versus the abroad of mutually in reliance on" the axiom proceeded the rating.In the objective aspects, argumentum three components of the traffic cause trouble sin and the scope of the atmospher
e terms of the road accident occurrence.In the aspect of object, point out the traffic cause trouble the object of the sin is a transportation safety.
PartIII: The traffic causes trouble the judicature of the sin affirms.This component causes trouble the sin to the traffic and noncriminal distinction, traffic cause trouble sin with other look like the distinction, traffic cause trouble ski accomplice of the sin affirms, the road accident onus affirms, the traffic causes trouble etc. of apportionment of liability of the sin proceeded the treatise, pointing out in juridical practice subsisting of problem, the union adduced own notion.
Part IV: The traffic causes trouble the sentence application of the sin. This component discussed three weighing of the penalties unit of the traffic cause trouble sin, versus" the traffic cause trouble escapes the " sum" because escapes behind with the result that body subversion" two problems proceeded the detailed treatise. Ultimately, adduced the traffic cause trouble sin in the aspects of sentence stipulating the legislative of the entity is flaw.
第一部分：交通肇事罪的理论发展与立法演变。本部分从纵向阐述了新中国成立后关于交通肇事罪的理论发展与立法演变过程，针对我国现行刑法规定的内容及相关的司法解释，提出了进一步研究的必要性。
第二部分：交通肇事罪的概念及特征。本部分从主体方面、主观方面、客观方面、客体方面对交通肇事罪的特征进行了论述。在主体方面，主要论证了驾驶非机动车辆、人力船舶的行为人和车辆主管人员(所有人、承包人)、行人、乘车人能够成为交通肇事罪主体的理由。主观方面，论证了交通肇事行为人主观上的两种过失情形即疏忽大意的过失和过于自信的过失，对怎样判断行为人的预见能力、过失犯罪中行为人的注意义务问题进行了探讨，并对国外的“相互信赖”原则进行了评价。客观方面，论述了交通肇事罪客观上的四个构成要件和交通事故发生的范围问题。在客体方面，指出了交通肇事罪侵犯的客体是交通运输安全。
第三部分：交通肇事罪的司法认定。本部分从交通肇事罪罪与非罪的区分、交通肇事罪与其他近似罪的区分、交通肇事罪共犯的认定、交通事故责任的认定、交通肇事罪的责任分担等方面进行了探讨，指出了在司法实践中存在的问题，并提出了自己的看法。
第四部分：交通肇事罪的刑罚适用。对交通肇事罪的三个量刑单位进行了论述，主要对怎样认定“交通肇事后逃逸”和“因逃逸致人死亡”两个问题进行了探讨。最后，提出了交通肇事罪在刑罚规定方面存在的立法缺陷。
The text causes trouble to offenses against traffic laws made the scheme discusses. The article is divided into four greatest components totally:
Part I : The traffic causes trouble the school of the sin rolls to turn into with legislative. This component from expatiated new China the concerning traffic lengthways to cause trouble after establishing the school of the sin roll to turn into with legislative. Ultimately, aim at contents and relevant judicial interpretations of the current penal provision in our country, adduce the necessity of the further study.
Part II: The traffic causes trouble notion and habits of the sin. This component caused trouble the habit of the sin to the traffic to proceed the treatise from the corpus aspect, subjective aspect, objective aspects, object. In the aspects of corpus, argumentum driving not the person of the motor vehicle, manpower ship and the personnel of car head( exercitor, contract for the body), pedestrian, go by car the body can become the re of the traffic cause trouble sin corpus. Subjective aspect, argumentum the traffic cause trouble abearance is human two kind negligence circumstance scilicet the negligence of the fault the gist and overconfident negligence, versus judge the human foresight in abearance ability, criminal negligence the inside how the human diligentia in abearance onus problem adduced own notion, combining versus the abroad of mutually in reliance on" the axiom proceeded the rating.In the objective aspects, argumentum three components of the traffic cause trouble sin and the scope of the atmospher
e terms of the road accident occurrence.In the aspect of object, point out the traffic cause trouble the object of the sin is a transportation safety.
PartIII: The traffic causes trouble the judicature of the sin affirms.This component causes trouble the sin to the traffic and noncriminal distinction, traffic cause trouble sin with other look like the distinction, traffic cause trouble ski accomplice of the sin affirms, the road accident onus affirms, the traffic causes trouble etc. of apportionment of liability of the sin proceeded the treatise, pointing out in juridical practice subsisting of problem, the union adduced own notion.
Part IV: The traffic causes trouble the sentence application of the sin. This component discussed three weighing of the penalties unit of the traffic cause trouble sin, versus" the traffic cause trouble escapes the " sum" because escapes behind with the result that body subversion" two problems proceeded the detailed treatise. Ultimately, adduced the traffic cause trouble sin in the aspects of sentence stipulating the legislative of the entity is flaw.
引文
[1]林亚刚：《危公共安全罪新论》，武汉大学出版社，2001年版。
[2]叶高峰主编：《危害公共安全罪的定罪与量刑》，人民法院出版社，2001年版。
[3]赵秉志主编：《危害公共安全罪》，中国人民公安大学出版社，1999年版。
[4]苏惠渔主编：《刑法学》(修订版)，中国政法大学出版社，1997年版。
[5]张穹主编：《中国刑法教程》，中国检察出版社，1998年版。
[6]高铭暄主编，赵秉志副主编：《新编中国刑法学》，中国人民大学出版社，1998年版。
[7]阴建峰、周加海主编：《共同犯罪适用中疑难问题研究》，吉林人民出版社，2000年版。
[1]孙学工：《〈关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释〉的理解与适用》，载《刑事审判参考》，2001年第1辑(总第12辑)，第75-80页。
[2]汪鸿宾：《周立杰交通肇事案如何认定交通肇事后逃逸》，载《刑事参考》2002年第3辑，第7-12页。
[3]张兆松：《交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的定罪问题》，载《人民检察》1999年第5辑，第18-21页。
[2]叶高峰主编：《危害公共安全罪的定罪与量刑》，人民法院出版社，2001年版。
[3]赵秉志主编：《危害公共安全罪》，中国人民公安大学出版社，1999年版。
[4]苏惠渔主编：《刑法学》(修订版)，中国政法大学出版社，1997年版。
[5]张穹主编：《中国刑法教程》，中国检察出版社，1998年版。
[6]高铭暄主编，赵秉志副主编：《新编中国刑法学》，中国人民大学出版社，1998年版。
[7]阴建峰、周加海主编：《共同犯罪适用中疑难问题研究》，吉林人民出版社，2000年版。
[1]孙学工：《〈关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释〉的理解与适用》，载《刑事审判参考》，2001年第1辑(总第12辑)，第75-80页。
[2]汪鸿宾：《周立杰交通肇事案如何认定交通肇事后逃逸》，载《刑事参考》2002年第3辑，第7-12页。
[3]张兆松：《交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的定罪问题》，载《人民检察》1999年第5辑，第18-21页。