科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应关系研究
|
摘要
随着经济全球化的深入发展和知识经济的初步形成,科技型人才的竞争越来越成为国家发展与竞争的焦点,是一个地区乃至国家创新能力提高的关键。因此,科技型人才在经济、社会发展中占有重要的战略地位。作为人力资源中的优秀群体,科技型人才在区域边际收益的引致下,出现了跨区域的流动,导致某一区域的人才分布密度超过了其它区域,形成科技型人才相对集中的聚集现象,并在一定环境的作用下,产生人才聚集效应。效应发挥如何受制度环境、文化环境、科技环境等多种因素影响,因此作为科技环境重要组成部分的科技资源配置是否合理对科技型人才聚集效应的产生与提升也起着至关重要的作用。
本文运用帕累托效率、科斯定理及适应性效率等相关基础理论,论述了科技资源配置的内涵及科技资源配置效率的影响因素。同时,以人口迁移理论、聚集经济理论与新增长理论为指导,阐述了科技型人才聚集效应的概念和特征。在此基础上,从经济学角度分析得出科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应关系密切,并运用相关回归分析方法,得出科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应呈正相关,继而建立科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应关系模型,并对此模型进行分析,得出相应的结论,并根据结论提出优化科技资源配置的相应对策,旨在提升科技型人才聚集的经济性效应,提高区域科技创新能力,推动我国创新型国家的建设。
论文所做的主要工作及创新之处:一是对科技资源配置效率和科技型人才聚集效应进行了较为系统的分析,并利用相关回归分析法确定了两者之间的关系;二是构建了科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应之间的关系模型,并提出优化科技资源配置的对策,以吸引更多的科技型人才聚集,更好的发挥科技型人才的聚集效应。
Technological talents has become an important factor of improving national and regional technology innovation level in the era of knowledge economy. So technological talents plays an important strategic position in the development of economy and society.
As a special factor of production, technological talents begin to flow cross-regionally because of marginal revenue, which results that an area talents density is more than other regions forming relative aggregation of technological talents that produces technological talents aggregation effect in certain environment. How does the effect play, which affected by many factors including system environment, culture environment, science and technology environment and so on, so technological resources allocation, as an important part of science and technology environment, plays a vital role to produce and promote technological talents aggregation effect.
The meaning of technological resources allocation and the affecting factors of technological resources allocation efficiency was discussed using relevant basic theories including Pareto Efficiency, Coase Theorem and adaptive efficiency. Meanwhile, the concept and characteristics of technological talents aggregation effect was explained with the guide of population migration theory, aggregation economy theory and new growth theory. Technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect has close relationship on the basis of above analysis, which was gotten from economy angle. Technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect is positively correlation, which was gotten using correlation and regression analysis. And then the relationship model between technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect was established and this model was analyzed and conclusions were drawn. And then relevant countermeasures about optimizing technological resources allocation was advised to enhance the economic effect of technological resources aggregation, improve regional technological innovation capacity and promote construction of our innovative country.
Seven sections were involved in this paper. The first chapter was an introduction; the second chapter included the theoretical foundation and literature review of technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect. Relevant theoretical foundation was outlined and current studies at home and abroad were reviewed; technological resources allocation efficiency was analyzed in the third chapter. Technological resources was defined in this chapter and then the meaning of technological resources allocation was given and affecting factors of technological resources allocation efficiency was analyzed; Technological talents aggregation effect was analyzed in the fourth chapter. Based on introducing technological talents aggregation effect related concepts, the characteristics of technological talents aggregation effect was analyzed; Chapter five is focal point in all chapters. Firstly, Secondly, According to the conclusions of chapter five, measures was put forward from the view of optimizing technological resources allocation to produce and enhance technological talents aggregation effect in the sixth chapter. Chapter seven is conclusions and prospects of this article.
There were a few main work and innovations in the article. First, technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect was systematic analysis respectively and their relationship was confirmed using correlation and regression analysis; Second, the relationship model of technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect was built and measures about optimizing technological resources allocation were advised to attract more technological talents to gather and exert technological talents aggregation effect greatly.
本文运用帕累托效率、科斯定理及适应性效率等相关基础理论,论述了科技资源配置的内涵及科技资源配置效率的影响因素。同时,以人口迁移理论、聚集经济理论与新增长理论为指导,阐述了科技型人才聚集效应的概念和特征。在此基础上,从经济学角度分析得出科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应关系密切,并运用相关回归分析方法,得出科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应呈正相关,继而建立科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应关系模型,并对此模型进行分析,得出相应的结论,并根据结论提出优化科技资源配置的相应对策,旨在提升科技型人才聚集的经济性效应,提高区域科技创新能力,推动我国创新型国家的建设。
论文所做的主要工作及创新之处:一是对科技资源配置效率和科技型人才聚集效应进行了较为系统的分析,并利用相关回归分析法确定了两者之间的关系;二是构建了科技资源配置效率与科技型人才聚集效应之间的关系模型,并提出优化科技资源配置的对策,以吸引更多的科技型人才聚集,更好的发挥科技型人才的聚集效应。
Technological talents has become an important factor of improving national and regional technology innovation level in the era of knowledge economy. So technological talents plays an important strategic position in the development of economy and society.
As a special factor of production, technological talents begin to flow cross-regionally because of marginal revenue, which results that an area talents density is more than other regions forming relative aggregation of technological talents that produces technological talents aggregation effect in certain environment. How does the effect play, which affected by many factors including system environment, culture environment, science and technology environment and so on, so technological resources allocation, as an important part of science and technology environment, plays a vital role to produce and promote technological talents aggregation effect.
The meaning of technological resources allocation and the affecting factors of technological resources allocation efficiency was discussed using relevant basic theories including Pareto Efficiency, Coase Theorem and adaptive efficiency. Meanwhile, the concept and characteristics of technological talents aggregation effect was explained with the guide of population migration theory, aggregation economy theory and new growth theory. Technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect has close relationship on the basis of above analysis, which was gotten from economy angle. Technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect is positively correlation, which was gotten using correlation and regression analysis. And then the relationship model between technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect was established and this model was analyzed and conclusions were drawn. And then relevant countermeasures about optimizing technological resources allocation was advised to enhance the economic effect of technological resources aggregation, improve regional technological innovation capacity and promote construction of our innovative country.
Seven sections were involved in this paper. The first chapter was an introduction; the second chapter included the theoretical foundation and literature review of technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect. Relevant theoretical foundation was outlined and current studies at home and abroad were reviewed; technological resources allocation efficiency was analyzed in the third chapter. Technological resources was defined in this chapter and then the meaning of technological resources allocation was given and affecting factors of technological resources allocation efficiency was analyzed; Technological talents aggregation effect was analyzed in the fourth chapter. Based on introducing technological talents aggregation effect related concepts, the characteristics of technological talents aggregation effect was analyzed; Chapter five is focal point in all chapters. Firstly, Secondly, According to the conclusions of chapter five, measures was put forward from the view of optimizing technological resources allocation to produce and enhance technological talents aggregation effect in the sixth chapter. Chapter seven is conclusions and prospects of this article.
There were a few main work and innovations in the article. First, technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect was systematic analysis respectively and their relationship was confirmed using correlation and regression analysis; Second, the relationship model of technological resources allocation efficiency and technological talents aggregation effect was built and measures about optimizing technological resources allocation were advised to attract more technological talents to gather and exert technological talents aggregation effect greatly.
引文
[1]黄少安.资源配置效率标准的多元性与一致性原理——兼论帕累托效率标准[J].经济评论,1995,(3):45-51.
[2]万威武,陈伟忠.可行性研究与项目评价[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1998.
[3] Ted O'Donoghue,Josef Zweimuller.Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth.Journal of Economic Growth,2004,9(1):81.
[4]师萍,李垣.科技资源体系内涵与制度因素[J].中国软科学,2000,(11):55-56.
[5]吴瑛.我国高技术产业科技资源配置效率的分析[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[6]王玉海.诺斯“适应性效率”概念的内涵及其启示[J].东方论坛,2005,(1):55-63.
[7]王奋.中国科技人力资源区域集聚的理论与实证研究[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2008.
[8]景芝英,徐雪梅.试论聚集经济的本质[J].财经问题研究,1998(11):11-13.
[9]廖逊.聚集经济效应[J].中国经济信息,1994(08):32.
[10] Teubal,Morris.R&D and Technology Policy in NICs as Learning Processes[J].World Development, 1996, 24( 3) : 449- 460.
[11] Hahn,Yoon-Hwan,Yu,Pyung-Il.Towards a New Technology Policy: The Integration of Generation and Diffusion[J].Technovation, 1999, 19( 3) :177- 186.
[12] JavierMEkboir.Research and Technology Policies in Innovation Systems:Zero Tillage in Brazil [J].Research Policy, 2003, 32( 4) : 573- 586.
[13] Stoneman, Paul.The Use of A Levy/Grant System as an Alternative to Tax Based Incentives to R&D[J].Research Policy, 1991, 20( 3) : 195- 201.
[14] Cohen, Linda.When Can Government Subsidize Research Joint Ventures Politics, Economics, and Limits to Technology Policy[J].The American Economic Review, 1994, 84( 2) : 159- 163
[15] renaud Bellais.Post Keynesian Theory, Technology Policy, and Long- term Growth[J].Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2004, 26( 3) : 419- 440.
[16] katharine Wakelin.Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30( 7) : 1079- 1090.
[17] day- YangLiu, Lon- FonShieh.TheEffects of Government Subsidy Measures on Corporate R&D Expenditure: a Case Study of the Leading Product Development Programme[J]. International Journal of Product Development,2005, 2( 3):2-7.
[18] Yasuda,Takehiko.Firm Growth,Size,Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing[J].Small Business Economics, 2005, 25( 1) :1- 15.
[19] Jog C.Mahlich,Thomas Roediger-Schluga.The Determinants of Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures : Evidence from Japan [J].Review of Industrial Organization, 2006, 28( 2) : 145- 164.
[20] Liberatore, Matthew J..An Extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Industrial R&D Project Selection and Resource Allocation [J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1987, 34( 1) : 12- 18.
[21] Brenner , Merrill S. .Practical R&D Project Prioritization [J ].Research Management, 1994, 37( 5) : 38- 42.
[22] Schmidt, Robert L.A..Stochastic Optimization Model to Improve Production Planning and R&D Resource Allocation in Biopharmaceutical Production Processes[J].Management Science, 1996, 42( 4) : 603- 617.
[23] kent F.Hansen, Malcolm A.Weiss.Allocating R&D Resources: A QuantitativeAid to Management Insight Sangman Kwak[J].Research Technology Management,1999, 42( 4) : 44-50..
[24]江涛,李石柱.国际化背景下政府主导科技资源配置的主要方式分析[J].中国科技论坛,2002,(4):9-14.
[25]李蓉,陈志刚.加速转型期的科技资源配置研究[J].科技创业月刊,2006,(5):14-16.
[26]宋宇.科技资源配置过程中的难点和无效率现象探讨[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999,(10):29-31.
[27]叶儒霏,陈欣然,余新炳等.影响我国科技资源配置效率的原因及对策分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,(5):13-18.
[28]彭华涛.区域科技资源配置的新制度经济学分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(1):141-144.
[29]王少青.我国高等学校科研投入产出分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002,(5):77-79.
[30]赵俊杰.合理使用科技资源提高科技投入产出效率[J].中国科技论坛,2005,(6):9-12.
[31]谢思全,张熇铭．京津冀科技资源的配置特点及对策研究[J]..科学学与科学技术管理2006,(10):103-109.
[32]李建华,周胜军,孙宝凤.我国科技人力资源与财力资源匹配规模优化研究[J].科学管理研究,2001,(6):72-76.
[33]连燕华,石兵,刘学英等..国家科学技术投入与产出评价[J].中国软科学,2002,(1):28-31.
[34]梅静娟,李石柱.科技资源配置阶段结构优化理论数学模型[J].北京机械工业学院学报,2002,(2):59-64.
[35]马勇,高延龙.科技资源使用效率研究[J].东北师范大学学报,2002,(3):24-28.
[36]李石柱,李冬梅,唐五湘.影响我国区域科技资源配置效率要素的定量分析[J].科学管理研究,2003,(2):60-63.
[37]李石柱,李冬梅,唐五湘.影响我国区域科技产出单指标效率要素的定量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003,(3):14-18.
[38]李冬梅,李石柱,唐五湘.我国区域科技资源配置效率情况评价[J].北京机械工业学院学报,2003,(1):50-55.
[39]魏守华,吴贵生.区域科技资源配置效率研究[J].科学学研究,2005,(4):467-473.
[40]马燕玲,马光威.甘肃省科技投入产出分析[J].中国科技论坛,2006,(4):65-68.
[41]李强.基于内生增长理论的我国科技投入产出绩效评价模型研究[J].科学管理研究,200(4):93-98.
[42]徐建国.我国区域科技资源配置能力分析[J].中国软科学,2002,(9):98-100.
[43]牛树海,金凤君,刘毅.科技资源配置的区域差异[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):61-67.
[44]华瑶.层次分析法在科技资源配置能力综合评价中的应用[J] .东北电力学院学报,2004,(2):42-44.
[45]杨艳萍.区域科技资源配置能力的综合评价[J].决策参考,2007,(6):68-70.
[46]徐晓霞.中国科技资源的现状及开发利用中存在的问题[J].资源科学,2003,(3):83-89.
[47]丁厚德.科技资源配置的新问题和对策分析[J].科学学研究,2005,(4):474-480.
[48]魏延田.区域科技资源的再配置问题分析[J].科技管理研究,2006,(6):40-45.
[49]冯广平,夏勇其,杨立冰.科技资源优化配置的重要途径[J].科技智囊,2008,(2):36-41.
[50]朱付元,丁厚德.台湾科技资源配置的特点与机制及其借鉴意义[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000,(5):20-24.
[51]严全治,席新.美国大学的科技资源优化配置及其效益[J].比较教育[J].研究,2003,(3):14-17.
[52]刘友平.美日德韩国家科技资源配置比较及借鉴意义[J].科技与管理,2005,(5):91-94.
[53]赵曙明.中国科技人才流动态势与对策[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[54]赵志涛.人才流动中的非经济因素分析[J].科技进步与对策,2001,(8):8-10.
[55]邹华等.人才资源柔性流动机制研究[J].中外科技信息,2003,(5):20-22.
[56]牛冲槐,将海洋,王聪.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(一)——制度环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(3):16-20.
[57]牛冲槐,唐朝永,芮雪琴.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(二)——经济环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(4):2-5.
[58]牛冲槐,曹阳,郭立芳.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(三)——社会环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(1):23-26.
[59]牛冲槐,王燕妮,杨春艳.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(四)——文化环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(3):2-4.
[60]牛冲槐,赵彩艳,樊艳萍.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(五)——科技环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(3):6-9.
[61]牛冲槐,李乾坤,张永红.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(六)——组织环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(4):2-5.
[62]牛冲槐,张敏,段治平等.科技型人才聚集效应与组织冲突消减研究[J].管理学报,2006,3(3):302-308.
[63]牛冲槐,接民,张敏等.人才聚集效应及其评判[J].中国软科学,2006,(4):118-123.
[64]牛冲槐,张敏,接民等.人才聚集中自我冲突的消减与人才聚集效应研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(8):148-154.
[65]孙鸿烈.中国资源科学百科全书[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2000.
[66]孙宝凤,李建华.基于可持续发展科技资源配置研究[J].社会科学战线,2001,(5):36-39.
[67]朱付元.我国目前科技资源配置的基本特征[J].中国科技论坛,2002,(2):61-64.
[68]杨子江.科技资源内涵与外延探讨[J].科技管理研究,2007,(2):213-216.
[69]刘玲利.科技资源配置理论与配置效率研究[D].吉林大学,2007.
[70]周寄中等.科技资源论[M ].西安:陕西人们教育出版社,1999.
[71]丁厚德.科技资源配置的战略地位[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,3(1): 35-41.
[72]姜钰.黑龙江省科技资源优化配置研究[J].工业技术经济,2008,(1):12-15.
[73] Bowonder,J K Racherla,N V Mastakar.R&D SPENDING PATTERNS OF GLOBAL FIRMS[J].Research Technology Management,2005:51.
[74]吴瑛.我国高技术产业科技资源配置效率的分析[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[75]杜谦,宋卫国.科技人才定义及相关统计问题[J].中国科技论坛,2004,(5):136-140.
[76]郭强,张林祥.科技人才科学管理研究[J].软科学,2005,(2):63.
[77]胡瑞卿.科技人才创新能力的模糊综合评价[J].科技管理研究,2007,(6):159-162.
[78]封铁英.科技人才评价现状与评价方法的选择和创新[J].科研管理,2007,28(增刊):30-34.
[79]郑文力.论势差效应与科技人才流动机制[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(2):112.
[80]文魁.科技创新人才环境研究报告[J].经济与管理研究,2006,(1):19-24.
[81]张敏.创新型人才培养环境的实践设计[J].经济与管理研究,2007,(7):67-70.
[82]吴冬梅,裴宏森.科技人才职业测评体系研究[J].经济与管理研究,2007,(5):21-24.
[83]黄文娣,李远.我国科技人才流动的特性分析[J].当代经济,2006,(7):77-78.
[84]牛冲槐,唐朝永.中国区域人才聚集力比较研究[J].机械管理开发,2007,(4):138-140.
[85]姬传生.人才评估的基本问题[J].徐州教育学院学报,2004,(1):31-32.
[86]陈韶光,徐天昊,袁伦渠.优秀中青年科技人才评价研究与应用[J].科技管理研究,2001,(2):63-66.
[87]李光红,杨晨.高层次人才评价指标体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(4):186-189.
[88]靳云全,路明兰.我国科技资源优化配置对策探讨[J].煤炭高等教育,2005,(5):104-106.
[89]傅家骥,仝允桓,高建等.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004:27.
[90] 2005年大中型工业企业研发投入跨上千亿元新台阶[J].数据,2006,(7):25.
[91]我国高技术产业研发投入强度显著高于制造业,但仍落后于发达国家[EB/OL]. http://www.sts.org.cn/nwdt/gndt/document/070129.htm.
[2]万威武,陈伟忠.可行性研究与项目评价[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1998.
[3] Ted O'Donoghue,Josef Zweimuller.Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth.Journal of Economic Growth,2004,9(1):81.
[4]师萍,李垣.科技资源体系内涵与制度因素[J].中国软科学,2000,(11):55-56.
[5]吴瑛.我国高技术产业科技资源配置效率的分析[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[6]王玉海.诺斯“适应性效率”概念的内涵及其启示[J].东方论坛,2005,(1):55-63.
[7]王奋.中国科技人力资源区域集聚的理论与实证研究[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2008.
[8]景芝英,徐雪梅.试论聚集经济的本质[J].财经问题研究,1998(11):11-13.
[9]廖逊.聚集经济效应[J].中国经济信息,1994(08):32.
[10] Teubal,Morris.R&D and Technology Policy in NICs as Learning Processes[J].World Development, 1996, 24( 3) : 449- 460.
[11] Hahn,Yoon-Hwan,Yu,Pyung-Il.Towards a New Technology Policy: The Integration of Generation and Diffusion[J].Technovation, 1999, 19( 3) :177- 186.
[12] JavierMEkboir.Research and Technology Policies in Innovation Systems:Zero Tillage in Brazil [J].Research Policy, 2003, 32( 4) : 573- 586.
[13] Stoneman, Paul.The Use of A Levy/Grant System as an Alternative to Tax Based Incentives to R&D[J].Research Policy, 1991, 20( 3) : 195- 201.
[14] Cohen, Linda.When Can Government Subsidize Research Joint Ventures Politics, Economics, and Limits to Technology Policy[J].The American Economic Review, 1994, 84( 2) : 159- 163
[15] renaud Bellais.Post Keynesian Theory, Technology Policy, and Long- term Growth[J].Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2004, 26( 3) : 419- 440.
[16] katharine Wakelin.Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30( 7) : 1079- 1090.
[17] day- YangLiu, Lon- FonShieh.TheEffects of Government Subsidy Measures on Corporate R&D Expenditure: a Case Study of the Leading Product Development Programme[J]. International Journal of Product Development,2005, 2( 3):2-7.
[18] Yasuda,Takehiko.Firm Growth,Size,Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing[J].Small Business Economics, 2005, 25( 1) :1- 15.
[19] Jog C.Mahlich,Thomas Roediger-Schluga.The Determinants of Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures : Evidence from Japan [J].Review of Industrial Organization, 2006, 28( 2) : 145- 164.
[20] Liberatore, Matthew J..An Extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Industrial R&D Project Selection and Resource Allocation [J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1987, 34( 1) : 12- 18.
[21] Brenner , Merrill S. .Practical R&D Project Prioritization [J ].Research Management, 1994, 37( 5) : 38- 42.
[22] Schmidt, Robert L.A..Stochastic Optimization Model to Improve Production Planning and R&D Resource Allocation in Biopharmaceutical Production Processes[J].Management Science, 1996, 42( 4) : 603- 617.
[23] kent F.Hansen, Malcolm A.Weiss.Allocating R&D Resources: A QuantitativeAid to Management Insight Sangman Kwak[J].Research Technology Management,1999, 42( 4) : 44-50..
[24]江涛,李石柱.国际化背景下政府主导科技资源配置的主要方式分析[J].中国科技论坛,2002,(4):9-14.
[25]李蓉,陈志刚.加速转型期的科技资源配置研究[J].科技创业月刊,2006,(5):14-16.
[26]宋宇.科技资源配置过程中的难点和无效率现象探讨[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999,(10):29-31.
[27]叶儒霏,陈欣然,余新炳等.影响我国科技资源配置效率的原因及对策分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,(5):13-18.
[28]彭华涛.区域科技资源配置的新制度经济学分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(1):141-144.
[29]王少青.我国高等学校科研投入产出分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002,(5):77-79.
[30]赵俊杰.合理使用科技资源提高科技投入产出效率[J].中国科技论坛,2005,(6):9-12.
[31]谢思全,张熇铭．京津冀科技资源的配置特点及对策研究[J]..科学学与科学技术管理2006,(10):103-109.
[32]李建华,周胜军,孙宝凤.我国科技人力资源与财力资源匹配规模优化研究[J].科学管理研究,2001,(6):72-76.
[33]连燕华,石兵,刘学英等..国家科学技术投入与产出评价[J].中国软科学,2002,(1):28-31.
[34]梅静娟,李石柱.科技资源配置阶段结构优化理论数学模型[J].北京机械工业学院学报,2002,(2):59-64.
[35]马勇,高延龙.科技资源使用效率研究[J].东北师范大学学报,2002,(3):24-28.
[36]李石柱,李冬梅,唐五湘.影响我国区域科技资源配置效率要素的定量分析[J].科学管理研究,2003,(2):60-63.
[37]李石柱,李冬梅,唐五湘.影响我国区域科技产出单指标效率要素的定量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003,(3):14-18.
[38]李冬梅,李石柱,唐五湘.我国区域科技资源配置效率情况评价[J].北京机械工业学院学报,2003,(1):50-55.
[39]魏守华,吴贵生.区域科技资源配置效率研究[J].科学学研究,2005,(4):467-473.
[40]马燕玲,马光威.甘肃省科技投入产出分析[J].中国科技论坛,2006,(4):65-68.
[41]李强.基于内生增长理论的我国科技投入产出绩效评价模型研究[J].科学管理研究,200(4):93-98.
[42]徐建国.我国区域科技资源配置能力分析[J].中国软科学,2002,(9):98-100.
[43]牛树海,金凤君,刘毅.科技资源配置的区域差异[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):61-67.
[44]华瑶.层次分析法在科技资源配置能力综合评价中的应用[J] .东北电力学院学报,2004,(2):42-44.
[45]杨艳萍.区域科技资源配置能力的综合评价[J].决策参考,2007,(6):68-70.
[46]徐晓霞.中国科技资源的现状及开发利用中存在的问题[J].资源科学,2003,(3):83-89.
[47]丁厚德.科技资源配置的新问题和对策分析[J].科学学研究,2005,(4):474-480.
[48]魏延田.区域科技资源的再配置问题分析[J].科技管理研究,2006,(6):40-45.
[49]冯广平,夏勇其,杨立冰.科技资源优化配置的重要途径[J].科技智囊,2008,(2):36-41.
[50]朱付元,丁厚德.台湾科技资源配置的特点与机制及其借鉴意义[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000,(5):20-24.
[51]严全治,席新.美国大学的科技资源优化配置及其效益[J].比较教育[J].研究,2003,(3):14-17.
[52]刘友平.美日德韩国家科技资源配置比较及借鉴意义[J].科技与管理,2005,(5):91-94.
[53]赵曙明.中国科技人才流动态势与对策[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[54]赵志涛.人才流动中的非经济因素分析[J].科技进步与对策,2001,(8):8-10.
[55]邹华等.人才资源柔性流动机制研究[J].中外科技信息,2003,(5):20-22.
[56]牛冲槐,将海洋,王聪.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(一)——制度环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(3):16-20.
[57]牛冲槐,唐朝永,芮雪琴.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(二)——经济环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(4):2-5.
[58]牛冲槐,曹阳,郭立芳.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(三)——社会环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(1):23-26.
[59]牛冲槐,王燕妮,杨春艳.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(四)——文化环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(3):2-4.
[60]牛冲槐,赵彩艳,樊艳萍.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(五)——科技环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(3):6-9.
[61]牛冲槐,李乾坤,张永红.科技型人才聚及环境及聚集效应分析(六)——组织环境对科技型人才聚集效应的影响分析[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(4):2-5.
[62]牛冲槐,张敏,段治平等.科技型人才聚集效应与组织冲突消减研究[J].管理学报,2006,3(3):302-308.
[63]牛冲槐,接民,张敏等.人才聚集效应及其评判[J].中国软科学,2006,(4):118-123.
[64]牛冲槐,张敏,接民等.人才聚集中自我冲突的消减与人才聚集效应研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(8):148-154.
[65]孙鸿烈.中国资源科学百科全书[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2000.
[66]孙宝凤,李建华.基于可持续发展科技资源配置研究[J].社会科学战线,2001,(5):36-39.
[67]朱付元.我国目前科技资源配置的基本特征[J].中国科技论坛,2002,(2):61-64.
[68]杨子江.科技资源内涵与外延探讨[J].科技管理研究,2007,(2):213-216.
[69]刘玲利.科技资源配置理论与配置效率研究[D].吉林大学,2007.
[70]周寄中等.科技资源论[M ].西安:陕西人们教育出版社,1999.
[71]丁厚德.科技资源配置的战略地位[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,3(1): 35-41.
[72]姜钰.黑龙江省科技资源优化配置研究[J].工业技术经济,2008,(1):12-15.
[73] Bowonder,J K Racherla,N V Mastakar.R&D SPENDING PATTERNS OF GLOBAL FIRMS[J].Research Technology Management,2005:51.
[74]吴瑛.我国高技术产业科技资源配置效率的分析[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[75]杜谦,宋卫国.科技人才定义及相关统计问题[J].中国科技论坛,2004,(5):136-140.
[76]郭强,张林祥.科技人才科学管理研究[J].软科学,2005,(2):63.
[77]胡瑞卿.科技人才创新能力的模糊综合评价[J].科技管理研究,2007,(6):159-162.
[78]封铁英.科技人才评价现状与评价方法的选择和创新[J].科研管理,2007,28(增刊):30-34.
[79]郑文力.论势差效应与科技人才流动机制[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(2):112.
[80]文魁.科技创新人才环境研究报告[J].经济与管理研究,2006,(1):19-24.
[81]张敏.创新型人才培养环境的实践设计[J].经济与管理研究,2007,(7):67-70.
[82]吴冬梅,裴宏森.科技人才职业测评体系研究[J].经济与管理研究,2007,(5):21-24.
[83]黄文娣,李远.我国科技人才流动的特性分析[J].当代经济,2006,(7):77-78.
[84]牛冲槐,唐朝永.中国区域人才聚集力比较研究[J].机械管理开发,2007,(4):138-140.
[85]姬传生.人才评估的基本问题[J].徐州教育学院学报,2004,(1):31-32.
[86]陈韶光,徐天昊,袁伦渠.优秀中青年科技人才评价研究与应用[J].科技管理研究,2001,(2):63-66.
[87]李光红,杨晨.高层次人才评价指标体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(4):186-189.
[88]靳云全,路明兰.我国科技资源优化配置对策探讨[J].煤炭高等教育,2005,(5):104-106.
[89]傅家骥,仝允桓,高建等.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004:27.
[90] 2005年大中型工业企业研发投入跨上千亿元新台阶[J].数据,2006,(7):25.
[91]我国高技术产业研发投入强度显著高于制造业,但仍落后于发达国家[EB/OL]. http://www.sts.org.cn/nwdt/gndt/document/070129.htm.