河南省科技人才开发与评价研究
|
摘要
随着科技强国、人才强省战略的推进,中央关于促进中部崛起战略的实施,又使得河南省科技人才开发面临难得的发展机遇。面对新形势新任务,如何指导河南省科技人才队伍建设,为河南省的科技人才工作提供依据,成为重要课题。国内在关于科技人才开发研究中研究方面多侧重于宏观政策和理念的介绍,本文认为科学合理的科技人才开发的政策与机制,必须建立在正确评价其开发的效率与水平以及深入分析开发内容与过程的基础之上,所以,本文采用理论分析与实证研究、定量分析与定性分析相结合的研究方法,立足于科学评价河南省科技人才开发的效率与水平,并深入分析科技人才的开发过程,为河南省科技人才队伍的建设提供科学的依据与参考。主要研究成果有:
1、从科技活动经费支出、科技研发支出、课题经费支出、机构经费内部支出四个方面构建了评价科技人才投入的指标体系;从专利情况、学术论文和专业论著三个方面评价科技人才的产出,并利用DEA方法进行综合评价,构建了科技人才投入产出效率评价模型,利用EViews软件对所选指标进行分析,证明利用所选择指标进行科技人才投入产出分析是合理的,并通过模型对河南省的评价结果证明了所建立模型的科学性。
2、构建了区域科技人才开发水平评价模型。从政府工作情况、科技人才开发的现状来描述科技人才开发的评价指标。政府工作情况方面的评价指标包括对科技人才的重视程度、对科技人才的支持力度、对科技人才的激励三个方面;科技人才现状包括现有科技机构情况、大中型工业企业科技情况、人才储备、科技人才市场化、人才资源丰度、人才资源结构几个方面;利用模糊综合评价方法进行综合评价。利用所建模型对河南省科技人才开发水平进行评价,评价结果为一般,符合河南省的实际。
3、分析了科技人才开发中的博弈过程,指出无论是在科技人才的引进过程还是在科技人才的激励过程中都要致力于消除或降低科技人才与用人单位之间的信息不对称性。指出在科技人才的引进过程中解决逆向选择的根本途径在于完善人才识别机制,为各类科技人才制定较为详细的层次划分标准,而不是唯学历、职称为标准;在科技人才的激励过程中在减少双方信息不对称的前提下,要尽可能全面地对科技人才的工作成果进行评价。最后根据博弈分析的结果对河南省科技人才的开发机制进行了建设。
The development of science and technology talents in Henan province is facing opportunities with the advance of technology strategy, talents strategy, and the promotion of central rise strategy. Facing the new situation and new tasks, how to guide the construction of science and technology talents in Henan Province which provides the basis for science and technology talents work has become an important topic. Domestic research on the development of science and technology talents focuses on macroeconomic policies and concept introduction while this paper proposes a point that policies and mechanisms of the science and technology talents should be established on the correct evaluation of the efficiency and the level of its development, as well as in-depth analysis of the development content and process. Therefore, this paper uses research methods of theoretical analysis, empirical research, quantitative analysis combined with qualitative analysis to complete scientific evaluation of the development level and efficiency of science and technology talents in Henan Province and analyze the development process of the science and technology talents in Henan Province. The research results provide scientific basis and reference for the team construction of science and technology talents in Henna province. Major Results of Research:
1)The research establishes the indicator System including input indicator System based on four respects including science and technology activities spending, science and technology R & D spending,project research spending,internal spending of agencies; Also establishes the output indicator System based on three respects including patents, professional books and academic papers. In this paper, comprehensive evaluation is completed by DEA method and the evaluation model of input-output efficiency of the science and technology talent is successfully constructed before the analysis of selected indicators by EViews (an econometric software tool), which proves the choice of the indicators of scientific and technological talents input-output analysis is reasonable. At last, the evaluation results of the model based on Henan Province show that the model established is scientific.
2)Construct the evaluation model of the regional development level of the science and technology talents. Describe the development of science and technology talent evaluation indicator about government work and the status of the development of science and technology talent. In the aspect of government work, the evaluation indicator includes three aspects, which are the importance of the science and technology talents, the intensity of the support of the science and technology talents, incentives for the science and technology talents. The status of the science and technology talents include in scientific and technological institutions, large and medium-sized industrial enterprises in science and technology, talents reservation, technology of the talent market, abundance of human resources, human resources structure and so on. Make use of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to complete the evaluation. Use the model of Henan Province in science and technology to evaluate the level of talent development. Although the result is common, it is actual.
3)This paper analyzes the development of science and technology talents in the course of the game, and indicates that we must try to eliminate or reduce the asymmetry of the information between the science and technology talents and employing units. We also find the fundamental way to resolve the reverse option in the process of introducing the science and technology talents, which is to perfect talents identification mechanism, detail the level of the development of standards for all types of the science and technology talents, not accord to qualifications, or the title of standards. What’s more, in the science and technology talents incentive process, reducing information asymmetry in the premise, we must try to evaluate the outcome of the work of science and technology talents to the fullest extent. At last, we build the mechanism for the development of the science and technology talents in Henan Province according to the analysis of the final outcome of the game.
1、从科技活动经费支出、科技研发支出、课题经费支出、机构经费内部支出四个方面构建了评价科技人才投入的指标体系;从专利情况、学术论文和专业论著三个方面评价科技人才的产出,并利用DEA方法进行综合评价,构建了科技人才投入产出效率评价模型,利用EViews软件对所选指标进行分析,证明利用所选择指标进行科技人才投入产出分析是合理的,并通过模型对河南省的评价结果证明了所建立模型的科学性。
2、构建了区域科技人才开发水平评价模型。从政府工作情况、科技人才开发的现状来描述科技人才开发的评价指标。政府工作情况方面的评价指标包括对科技人才的重视程度、对科技人才的支持力度、对科技人才的激励三个方面;科技人才现状包括现有科技机构情况、大中型工业企业科技情况、人才储备、科技人才市场化、人才资源丰度、人才资源结构几个方面;利用模糊综合评价方法进行综合评价。利用所建模型对河南省科技人才开发水平进行评价,评价结果为一般,符合河南省的实际。
3、分析了科技人才开发中的博弈过程,指出无论是在科技人才的引进过程还是在科技人才的激励过程中都要致力于消除或降低科技人才与用人单位之间的信息不对称性。指出在科技人才的引进过程中解决逆向选择的根本途径在于完善人才识别机制,为各类科技人才制定较为详细的层次划分标准,而不是唯学历、职称为标准;在科技人才的激励过程中在减少双方信息不对称的前提下,要尽可能全面地对科技人才的工作成果进行评价。最后根据博弈分析的结果对河南省科技人才的开发机制进行了建设。
The development of science and technology talents in Henan province is facing opportunities with the advance of technology strategy, talents strategy, and the promotion of central rise strategy. Facing the new situation and new tasks, how to guide the construction of science and technology talents in Henan Province which provides the basis for science and technology talents work has become an important topic. Domestic research on the development of science and technology talents focuses on macroeconomic policies and concept introduction while this paper proposes a point that policies and mechanisms of the science and technology talents should be established on the correct evaluation of the efficiency and the level of its development, as well as in-depth analysis of the development content and process. Therefore, this paper uses research methods of theoretical analysis, empirical research, quantitative analysis combined with qualitative analysis to complete scientific evaluation of the development level and efficiency of science and technology talents in Henan Province and analyze the development process of the science and technology talents in Henan Province. The research results provide scientific basis and reference for the team construction of science and technology talents in Henna province. Major Results of Research:
1)The research establishes the indicator System including input indicator System based on four respects including science and technology activities spending, science and technology R & D spending,project research spending,internal spending of agencies; Also establishes the output indicator System based on three respects including patents, professional books and academic papers. In this paper, comprehensive evaluation is completed by DEA method and the evaluation model of input-output efficiency of the science and technology talent is successfully constructed before the analysis of selected indicators by EViews (an econometric software tool), which proves the choice of the indicators of scientific and technological talents input-output analysis is reasonable. At last, the evaluation results of the model based on Henan Province show that the model established is scientific.
2)Construct the evaluation model of the regional development level of the science and technology talents. Describe the development of science and technology talent evaluation indicator about government work and the status of the development of science and technology talent. In the aspect of government work, the evaluation indicator includes three aspects, which are the importance of the science and technology talents, the intensity of the support of the science and technology talents, incentives for the science and technology talents. The status of the science and technology talents include in scientific and technological institutions, large and medium-sized industrial enterprises in science and technology, talents reservation, technology of the talent market, abundance of human resources, human resources structure and so on. Make use of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to complete the evaluation. Use the model of Henan Province in science and technology to evaluate the level of talent development. Although the result is common, it is actual.
3)This paper analyzes the development of science and technology talents in the course of the game, and indicates that we must try to eliminate or reduce the asymmetry of the information between the science and technology talents and employing units. We also find the fundamental way to resolve the reverse option in the process of introducing the science and technology talents, which is to perfect talents identification mechanism, detail the level of the development of standards for all types of the science and technology talents, not accord to qualifications, or the title of standards. What’s more, in the science and technology talents incentive process, reducing information asymmetry in the premise, we must try to evaluate the outcome of the work of science and technology talents to the fullest extent. At last, we build the mechanism for the development of the science and technology talents in Henan Province according to the analysis of the final outcome of the game.
引文
[1]Becker , G. S. Human Capital Columbia University Press,1964.
[2]赵履宽,劳动就业与劳动力市场建设,南京:江苏人民出版社,1998
[3]李忠民,人力资本-—个理论框架及其对中国一些问题的解释,北京:经济科学出版社,1999
[4]李建民,人力资本通论,上海:上海三联书店,1999
[5]候风云,中国人力资本形成及现状,北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[6]李宝元,人力资本运营,北京:企业管理出版社,2001
[7]Schneier CE, Beatly R W,Baired CS , The Performance Management Sourcebook, Human Resource Development Press ,1987
[8]OECD, The Evaluation of Scientific Research: Selected Experience,1997
[9]Deni Elliot,Research Ethics, University Press of New England,1997
[10]罗广玲,吕建辉,郑怀远等,《中国科学》D辑近五年载文与引文统计分析,情报杂志,2002(10):22-23
[11]A.F.J Van Rann, Bibliometric Indicators as Research Performance Evaluation Tools,European University. Conference on "Research Management in Europe Today Florence,1990
[12] Sbragia R, Kruglianskas,R&D in Brazilian Industry: recent indicators research, Technology Management.1996(39-2),354-358
[13]Lawani S.M, Biliometrics its theoretical foundations, methods and application,LIBRJ.1981(31-4):343-349
[14]梁静国.科研院所综合实力评估方法实践[J].决策与决策支持系统,1994,4(3):64-70
[15]刘文达,邰忠智,李光泽.浅谈高校科研评估体系的构建.科技管理研究,1999(1):16-18
[16]胡宝民,王丽丽,祝惠青.高等学校科研机构评价指标及有效性评估模型研究.技术经济,2000(5):55-57.
[17]王平心,梁颖庄,韩英等,高校内部投入产出关系研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).1999(01):65-69
[18]丁福虎.科研绩效评估的理论与方法.科技管理研究,2000(3):45-48
[19]袁洁.高校办学效益的一种计算方法探讨[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).2003, 4(3):112-115
[20]毛军文,刘超,施红等.科技攻关课题检查验收综合评价方法的建立和应用[J].中华医学科研管理杂志.1997(01):38-39
[21]Rousseau, S., Rousseau, R,Data envalopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators. Scienometrics,1997(40):45-56;
[22]Rousseau, S., Rousseau, R, Measuring the scientific wealth of European Nations: Taking effectiveness into account. Scienometrics,1998(42):75-87
[23]王晓红,王雪峰,翟爱梅,冯英浚,一种基于DEA和多指标综合评价的大学科研绩效评价方法,中国软科学,2004(8):156-160
[24]Daft,R.L.,Organization Theory&Design,South-Western College Publishing,1997
[25]Barbara L.Ran,Gary A.Adams,Attracting retirees to apply:desired organizational characteristics of bridge employment,Journal of Organizational Behavior,2005,26(6):649-695
[26]Douglas C,Maynard,Todd J,Thorsteinson,Natalya M,Parfyonora,Reasons for working part-time:Subgroup differences in job attitudes and turnover intentions ,Career Development International,2006,11(2):145
[27]Dyuti S,Banerjee,Noel Gaston,Labour market signaling and job turnover revisited,Labour Economics,2004,11:599-622
[28]刘青山,知识型员工流失原因初探,经济论坛,2004,11:82-83
[29]王霞,我国科技人力资源评价指标体系研究,博士论文,北京:北京理工大学,2003
[30]Bandyopadhyay,Debsais On the model selection to represent human capital distribution-an empirical study Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference ,2003(1): 13-220
[31]Bandyopadhyay,Debsais On the model selection to represent human capital distribution-an empirical study Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference ,2003,112:13-220
[32]赵彦云,中国国际竞争力发展报告(1999)-科技竞争力主题,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999
[33]李志刚;汤书昆,科技中介服务业建设水平评价指标体系研究,科学学与科学技术管理,2004:88～91
[34]谢作渺,姜彦福,林强,我国科研体制评价体系的建立与评价,科学学与科学技术管理,2003:11～14
[35]李健宁,高等学校学科竞争力评价研究:[博士学位论文],上海;华东师范大学,2004
[36]庞景安,张玉华,中国科技期刊综合评价指标体系的研究,中国科技期刊研究,2000:217～219
[37]兰玉杰,陈晓剑,企业人才资源评价指标体系研究,数量经济技术经济研究,2001:74-77
[38]崔国瑞,高新技术企业综合发展能力评价研究:[硕士学位论文],成都;四川大学,2003
[39]孟凡强、时博、唐洁、盛刚、李新建,天津市博士科技人才开发现状的调查,科技管理研究,2007(5):35-38
[40]龚桢志、曾国平、周莉,西部地区创新性人才开发战略研究,科技管理研究,2005(10):47-48
[41]齐荣坤,广东科技人力资源开发的现状及对策,科技管理研究2004(5):78-79
[42]李敏,基于模糊逻辑的人力资源评价指标体系在旅游管理中的应用研究,重庆工学院学报,2006(7):56-59
[43]刘晓红,徐扬,裴峥,基于证据理论的人力资源评价结果合成方法,统计与决策,2006(6):99-101
[44]王媛,马小燕,基于模糊理论与神经网络的人才评价方法,科学管理研究,2006(3):79-81
[45]易经章,胡振华,科技人才测评指标研究,湖南工程学院学报,2003(1):89～92
[46]李思宏,罗瑾琏,张波,科技人才评价纬度与方法进展,科学管理研究,2007(2):43-45
[47]胡瑞卿,“跳槽”科技人才个人收益测评指标体系的构建与测定,统计与信息论坛,2006(7):47-48
[48]王通讯,宏观人才学,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986:7-11
[49]潘灵霞,科技人才流动中的竞业禁止问题研究:[硕士学位论文],武汉;武汉理工大学,2007
[50]夏子贵,人才学原理,重庆:西南师范大学出版社,1989:12-31
[51]王康王通讯,人才学基础,哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,1987:21-33
[52]王通讯,人才学教程,郑州:河南人民出版社,1986:7-13
[53]江泽民,论科学技术,北京:中央文献出版社,2001
[54]钟祖荣,现代人才学,杭州:浙江教育出版社,1986:22-28;
[55]刘金祥,全球科技人才竞争态势,企业技术进步,2004.6: 27-28
[56]中共中央国务院关于进一步加强人才工作的决定(2003年12月26日),人民日报,2004年1月1日第1版
[57]李学伟,经济数据分析预测学,北京:中国铁道出版社,1998:31-62
[58]邓聚龙,灰色预测与决策,武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1988
[59]刘思峰等,灰色系统理论及其应用,北京:中国科学出版社,1999
[60]罗积玉邢英,经济统计分析方法及预测,北京:清华大学出版社,1987:33-116
[61]陈红,人才需求组合预测模型研究,地质技术经济管理,1998,20(3):36-45
[62]黄力平魏献齐马尔柯夫链一线性回归组合预测专门人才方法,华中理工大学学报,1998,26(4):15-17
[63]陈希孺王松桂,近代回归分析一原理方法及应用,安徽教育出版社,1987:56-178
[64]于文远唐伟,人才需求的动态组合预测方法及应用,中国软科学,1998,(3):31-35
[65][美]J.奈特w.瓦萨尔曼,应用统计学,天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1991:65-77
[66]颜日初孙静娟,经济预测理论与方法,西宁:广西人民出版社,1991:131-166
[67]Charnes,A.,W.W.Cooper and E.Rhodes,Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,European Journal of Operational Research,1978:429-444
[68]魏权龄,评价相对有效性的DEA方法-运筹学的新领域,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988
[69]艾里克·拉斯缪森,博弈与信息——博弈论概论(第二版),北京:北京大学出版社,2004
[70]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学,上海:上海人民出版社,2005
[71]刘德钦刘宇薛新玉,中国人口分布及空间相关分析[J],测绘科学,2004,20(7):76-79
[72]崔艳凤崔华,利用罗伦斯曲线对沿海各省市农村劳动力集中化程度的比较分析[J],辽宁行政学院报,2004,6(4):54-55
[73]数据数据中国数据资料信息,中部六省:崛起立足于工业化和城市化[X],2004-2005中国区域发展系列比较
[74]中共河南省委组织部河南省人事厅中共湖北省委组织部湖北省人事厅中共湖南省委组织部湖南省人事厅中共山西省委组织部山西省人事厅中共安徽省委组织部安徽省人事厅中共江西省委组织部江西省人事厅,中部六省人才开发合作共同宣言,中国中部崛起人才论坛,2005年9月11日
[75]河南科技厅,河南省实施科技人才发展基金取得成效,河南科技,2007(1):7
[76]高洪涛徐文洪,关于加强河南省科技人才队伍建设的思考,河南科技,2006(1):4-5
[77]席升阳,河南省科技人才结构的优化,河南科技,2002(1),20-21
[78]范森秦秋香,河南省人才资源开发中存在的问题及原因分析,河南商业高等专科学校学报,2006,19(2):57-59
[79]宋艳琴秦冬晓,河南和部分省份技术人才资源状况比较研究,中州学刊,2002(4):207-209
[80]王晓红,基于投入产出分析的科研绩效评价理论模型与方法研究:[博士论文],哈尔滨;哈尔滨工业大学,2004
[81] William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Joe Zhu, Handbook On Data Envelopment Analysis,Kluwer Academic Publishers,2004
[82]陈建林,西部人力资本投入的政府行为分析,理论与实践,2005年(7):87
[83]齐二石,刘传铭,王玲.公共组织绩效管理综合评测模型以及应用[J].天津大学学报:社会科学版,2004(4):206-210
[84]李学伟,经济数据分析预测学,北京:中国铁道出版社,1998:54-62
[85]邓聚龙,灰色预测与决策,武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1988,99-107
[86]刘思峰等,灰色系统理论及其应用,北京:中国科学出版社,1999,56-77
[87]张宜华,精通MATLAB 5,北京:清华大学出版社,1998,33-76
[88]Wilson,R.,The structure of Incentive for Decentralization under Uncertainty,La Decision 171,1969
[89]Spence.M,R.Zechhauser,Insurance,Information and Individual Action ,American Economic Review(Papers and Proceedings),1971(61): 380-387
[90]Ross.S,The Economic Theory of Agency:The Principal's Problem, American Economic Review,1973(63):380-387
[91]何凯庄志晖,信息不完美条件下的劳动力市场博弈,重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2006,23(3):14-18
[92]陈丹红,科技人才激励机制的宏观构建与微观实施,企业经济,2006(10):34-36
[93]王世明吕渭济,浅谈人力资源配置中的信息不对称,经济与管理,2004,18(4):63-64
[94]姚华锋黎永泰夏长清,人力资源招聘的信息不对称及其防范对策,现代管理科学,2005(5):24-25
[2]赵履宽,劳动就业与劳动力市场建设,南京:江苏人民出版社,1998
[3]李忠民,人力资本-—个理论框架及其对中国一些问题的解释,北京:经济科学出版社,1999
[4]李建民,人力资本通论,上海:上海三联书店,1999
[5]候风云,中国人力资本形成及现状,北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[6]李宝元,人力资本运营,北京:企业管理出版社,2001
[7]Schneier CE, Beatly R W,Baired CS , The Performance Management Sourcebook, Human Resource Development Press ,1987
[8]OECD, The Evaluation of Scientific Research: Selected Experience,1997
[9]Deni Elliot,Research Ethics, University Press of New England,1997
[10]罗广玲,吕建辉,郑怀远等,《中国科学》D辑近五年载文与引文统计分析,情报杂志,2002(10):22-23
[11]A.F.J Van Rann, Bibliometric Indicators as Research Performance Evaluation Tools,European University. Conference on "Research Management in Europe Today Florence,1990
[12] Sbragia R, Kruglianskas,R&D in Brazilian Industry: recent indicators research, Technology Management.1996(39-2),354-358
[13]Lawani S.M, Biliometrics its theoretical foundations, methods and application,LIBRJ.1981(31-4):343-349
[14]梁静国.科研院所综合实力评估方法实践[J].决策与决策支持系统,1994,4(3):64-70
[15]刘文达,邰忠智,李光泽.浅谈高校科研评估体系的构建.科技管理研究,1999(1):16-18
[16]胡宝民,王丽丽,祝惠青.高等学校科研机构评价指标及有效性评估模型研究.技术经济,2000(5):55-57.
[17]王平心,梁颖庄,韩英等,高校内部投入产出关系研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).1999(01):65-69
[18]丁福虎.科研绩效评估的理论与方法.科技管理研究,2000(3):45-48
[19]袁洁.高校办学效益的一种计算方法探讨[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).2003, 4(3):112-115
[20]毛军文,刘超,施红等.科技攻关课题检查验收综合评价方法的建立和应用[J].中华医学科研管理杂志.1997(01):38-39
[21]Rousseau, S., Rousseau, R,Data envalopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators. Scienometrics,1997(40):45-56;
[22]Rousseau, S., Rousseau, R, Measuring the scientific wealth of European Nations: Taking effectiveness into account. Scienometrics,1998(42):75-87
[23]王晓红,王雪峰,翟爱梅,冯英浚,一种基于DEA和多指标综合评价的大学科研绩效评价方法,中国软科学,2004(8):156-160
[24]Daft,R.L.,Organization Theory&Design,South-Western College Publishing,1997
[25]Barbara L.Ran,Gary A.Adams,Attracting retirees to apply:desired organizational characteristics of bridge employment,Journal of Organizational Behavior,2005,26(6):649-695
[26]Douglas C,Maynard,Todd J,Thorsteinson,Natalya M,Parfyonora,Reasons for working part-time:Subgroup differences in job attitudes and turnover intentions ,Career Development International,2006,11(2):145
[27]Dyuti S,Banerjee,Noel Gaston,Labour market signaling and job turnover revisited,Labour Economics,2004,11:599-622
[28]刘青山,知识型员工流失原因初探,经济论坛,2004,11:82-83
[29]王霞,我国科技人力资源评价指标体系研究,博士论文,北京:北京理工大学,2003
[30]Bandyopadhyay,Debsais On the model selection to represent human capital distribution-an empirical study Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference ,2003(1): 13-220
[31]Bandyopadhyay,Debsais On the model selection to represent human capital distribution-an empirical study Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference ,2003,112:13-220
[32]赵彦云,中国国际竞争力发展报告(1999)-科技竞争力主题,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999
[33]李志刚;汤书昆,科技中介服务业建设水平评价指标体系研究,科学学与科学技术管理,2004:88～91
[34]谢作渺,姜彦福,林强,我国科研体制评价体系的建立与评价,科学学与科学技术管理,2003:11～14
[35]李健宁,高等学校学科竞争力评价研究:[博士学位论文],上海;华东师范大学,2004
[36]庞景安,张玉华,中国科技期刊综合评价指标体系的研究,中国科技期刊研究,2000:217～219
[37]兰玉杰,陈晓剑,企业人才资源评价指标体系研究,数量经济技术经济研究,2001:74-77
[38]崔国瑞,高新技术企业综合发展能力评价研究:[硕士学位论文],成都;四川大学,2003
[39]孟凡强、时博、唐洁、盛刚、李新建,天津市博士科技人才开发现状的调查,科技管理研究,2007(5):35-38
[40]龚桢志、曾国平、周莉,西部地区创新性人才开发战略研究,科技管理研究,2005(10):47-48
[41]齐荣坤,广东科技人力资源开发的现状及对策,科技管理研究2004(5):78-79
[42]李敏,基于模糊逻辑的人力资源评价指标体系在旅游管理中的应用研究,重庆工学院学报,2006(7):56-59
[43]刘晓红,徐扬,裴峥,基于证据理论的人力资源评价结果合成方法,统计与决策,2006(6):99-101
[44]王媛,马小燕,基于模糊理论与神经网络的人才评价方法,科学管理研究,2006(3):79-81
[45]易经章,胡振华,科技人才测评指标研究,湖南工程学院学报,2003(1):89～92
[46]李思宏,罗瑾琏,张波,科技人才评价纬度与方法进展,科学管理研究,2007(2):43-45
[47]胡瑞卿,“跳槽”科技人才个人收益测评指标体系的构建与测定,统计与信息论坛,2006(7):47-48
[48]王通讯,宏观人才学,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986:7-11
[49]潘灵霞,科技人才流动中的竞业禁止问题研究:[硕士学位论文],武汉;武汉理工大学,2007
[50]夏子贵,人才学原理,重庆:西南师范大学出版社,1989:12-31
[51]王康王通讯,人才学基础,哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,1987:21-33
[52]王通讯,人才学教程,郑州:河南人民出版社,1986:7-13
[53]江泽民,论科学技术,北京:中央文献出版社,2001
[54]钟祖荣,现代人才学,杭州:浙江教育出版社,1986:22-28;
[55]刘金祥,全球科技人才竞争态势,企业技术进步,2004.6: 27-28
[56]中共中央国务院关于进一步加强人才工作的决定(2003年12月26日),人民日报,2004年1月1日第1版
[57]李学伟,经济数据分析预测学,北京:中国铁道出版社,1998:31-62
[58]邓聚龙,灰色预测与决策,武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1988
[59]刘思峰等,灰色系统理论及其应用,北京:中国科学出版社,1999
[60]罗积玉邢英,经济统计分析方法及预测,北京:清华大学出版社,1987:33-116
[61]陈红,人才需求组合预测模型研究,地质技术经济管理,1998,20(3):36-45
[62]黄力平魏献齐马尔柯夫链一线性回归组合预测专门人才方法,华中理工大学学报,1998,26(4):15-17
[63]陈希孺王松桂,近代回归分析一原理方法及应用,安徽教育出版社,1987:56-178
[64]于文远唐伟,人才需求的动态组合预测方法及应用,中国软科学,1998,(3):31-35
[65][美]J.奈特w.瓦萨尔曼,应用统计学,天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1991:65-77
[66]颜日初孙静娟,经济预测理论与方法,西宁:广西人民出版社,1991:131-166
[67]Charnes,A.,W.W.Cooper and E.Rhodes,Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,European Journal of Operational Research,1978:429-444
[68]魏权龄,评价相对有效性的DEA方法-运筹学的新领域,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988
[69]艾里克·拉斯缪森,博弈与信息——博弈论概论(第二版),北京:北京大学出版社,2004
[70]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学,上海:上海人民出版社,2005
[71]刘德钦刘宇薛新玉,中国人口分布及空间相关分析[J],测绘科学,2004,20(7):76-79
[72]崔艳凤崔华,利用罗伦斯曲线对沿海各省市农村劳动力集中化程度的比较分析[J],辽宁行政学院报,2004,6(4):54-55
[73]数据数据中国数据资料信息,中部六省:崛起立足于工业化和城市化[X],2004-2005中国区域发展系列比较
[74]中共河南省委组织部河南省人事厅中共湖北省委组织部湖北省人事厅中共湖南省委组织部湖南省人事厅中共山西省委组织部山西省人事厅中共安徽省委组织部安徽省人事厅中共江西省委组织部江西省人事厅,中部六省人才开发合作共同宣言,中国中部崛起人才论坛,2005年9月11日
[75]河南科技厅,河南省实施科技人才发展基金取得成效,河南科技,2007(1):7
[76]高洪涛徐文洪,关于加强河南省科技人才队伍建设的思考,河南科技,2006(1):4-5
[77]席升阳,河南省科技人才结构的优化,河南科技,2002(1),20-21
[78]范森秦秋香,河南省人才资源开发中存在的问题及原因分析,河南商业高等专科学校学报,2006,19(2):57-59
[79]宋艳琴秦冬晓,河南和部分省份技术人才资源状况比较研究,中州学刊,2002(4):207-209
[80]王晓红,基于投入产出分析的科研绩效评价理论模型与方法研究:[博士论文],哈尔滨;哈尔滨工业大学,2004
[81] William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Joe Zhu, Handbook On Data Envelopment Analysis,Kluwer Academic Publishers,2004
[82]陈建林,西部人力资本投入的政府行为分析,理论与实践,2005年(7):87
[83]齐二石,刘传铭,王玲.公共组织绩效管理综合评测模型以及应用[J].天津大学学报:社会科学版,2004(4):206-210
[84]李学伟,经济数据分析预测学,北京:中国铁道出版社,1998:54-62
[85]邓聚龙,灰色预测与决策,武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1988,99-107
[86]刘思峰等,灰色系统理论及其应用,北京:中国科学出版社,1999,56-77
[87]张宜华,精通MATLAB 5,北京:清华大学出版社,1998,33-76
[88]Wilson,R.,The structure of Incentive for Decentralization under Uncertainty,La Decision 171,1969
[89]Spence.M,R.Zechhauser,Insurance,Information and Individual Action ,American Economic Review(Papers and Proceedings),1971(61): 380-387
[90]Ross.S,The Economic Theory of Agency:The Principal's Problem, American Economic Review,1973(63):380-387
[91]何凯庄志晖,信息不完美条件下的劳动力市场博弈,重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2006,23(3):14-18
[92]陈丹红,科技人才激励机制的宏观构建与微观实施,企业经济,2006(10):34-36
[93]王世明吕渭济,浅谈人力资源配置中的信息不对称,经济与管理,2004,18(4):63-64
[94]姚华锋黎永泰夏长清,人力资源招聘的信息不对称及其防范对策,现代管理科学,2005(5):24-25