基于知识的高校师资队伍管理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在知识经济社会中,知识已经成为经济发展的重要资本和社会进步的强大推动力量。知识经济社会对人的要求普遍提高,其中一个主要特征就是人们普遍地具有较高的素质,普遍地受过高等教育,每个人的知识水平普遍地高于以往的各种社会形态,这就要求社会能够提供大众化高等教育及终身教育、终身学习的各种条件和环境。虽然现在信息网络技术已经改变了人们的某些生活方式,人们可以从网络上获得很多知识。但是,这些知识主要是可以明示的显性知识。而存在于人们头脑中的,很难明确表达出来的那部分知识——隐性知识,却需要在高校环境下进行传播。因此,高等教育仍然是进行知识传播主要方式。社会进步的这一发展需求使得高等教育一改以往精英化教育的模式,而形成了大众化的高等教育形态。高校教师是知识的重要生产者和传播者,只有管理好高校师资队伍,才能够有效地进行高等教育。目前的高校师资队伍是在精英教育条件下建立起来的,那么,在高等教育大众化条件下高校师资队伍应该如何建设和管理是本文重点要研究的问题。
     本文针对这一课题,从知识管理的视角出发,以系统科学、知识科学和高等教育学等理论为基础,采用调查分析、专家咨询、数据分析、逻辑论证、比较研究及定性和定量相结合的方法进行了深入研究。
     高校师资劳动的本质是知识生产、知识传播和知识创新,因此,高校师资队伍的建设和管理不能完全利用传统人力资源管理的理论和方法,而需要从知识这一本质出发,引进知识管理理论和方法与传统的高校师资队伍管理理论方法相结合,进行系统分析。在此基础上,构建高校师资队伍管理体系,提出管理方法,设计高校师资队伍的综合评价指标体系和评价方法。论文的主要内容如下:
     一、分析了高校师资队伍知识生产和知识传播的本质特征。从高校师资队伍系统及其管理的本质以及高校师资队伍系统同外部环境的关系,指出了影响师资队伍系统整体特性的内在因素。高校师资队伍的主要职能是传播知识、创造知识和社会服务。高校教师的本质是知识工作者。提出了应用知识管理加强高校师资队伍建设和管理的思路及方法。根据目前本领域存在的问题,提出本项研究的目标、研究路线和要解决的关键问题。
     二、提出了基于知识的高校师资队伍管理体系。从高校师资队伍的知识输入、输出展开研究,从知识科学和系统科学的角度,提出以知识蝶、知识泵、知识链、知识网络为主体的高校师资队伍管理的知识拓扑结构体系,并在此基础上给出由知识输入管理、知识泵管理、知识输出管理为主要内容的高校师资队伍管理体系。
     三、提出了基于知识的高校师资队伍管理方法。从前面的分析可知高校师资队伍管理的本质是知识管理,因此知识管理方法应该是高校师资队伍管理的主导管理方法。按照知识管理的一般逻辑步骤,从知识的输入、传播、创新、输出与自学习等知识活动过程给出了相应的管理方法,这些环节覆盖了高校师资队伍管理的主要方面。
     四、提出了基于知识的高校师资综合评价指标体系和评价方法。从高校教师工作产出的知识本质出发,给出了高校师资队伍评价的原则、评价内容与依据,以及应注意的问题。分析研究了高校师资知识评价的显性知识评价指标体系和隐性知识评价指标体系。在此基础上给出了一套高校师资综合评价指标体系和评价方法。
     本文研究的问题是作者多年从事高校师资队伍管理工作的总结和提炼,在理论研究的基础之上,本文还针对大连理工大学师资队伍状况和管理进行了实例分析和应用研究。
In a knowledge economy society when people are better-educated and equipped with improved quality and higher level of knowledge, knowledge has become the magnificent capital for economic development and powerful impetus to social progress as well. Consequently, society is expected to offer conditions and environment for mass higher education, life-long education and life-long learning. Although the network and information technology has brought about changes to people's way of living and enabled people to obtain more knowledge from internet, most of such easily-obtained knowledge seems to be explicit and while the tacit knowledge which exists in human's mind and is hard to explicitly expressed still has to be transmitted in a college-based environment. In this sense, higher education remains the major means of knowledge transmission. The development demands of social progress have turned higher education from the Elite Education model into the Mass Education model. Only with a good management on college faculty who serve as the important producers and transmitters of knowledge can higher education effectively be carried through. However, most of the current college faculty systems are established in an Elite Education condition, which gives rise to the research focus of this dissertation, namely, how to construct and manage college faculty system in a Mass Education condition.
     To address such a problem, this dissertation, from the perspective of knowledge management, undergoes in-depth researches based on relevant theories on system science, knowledge science and higher education science, with such instruments as survey analysis, expert consultation, data analysis, logic argumentation, comparative research and the integration of qualitative and quantitative research employed.
     The nature of college faculty lies in the production, transmission and innovation of knowledge. Therefore, the construction of college faculty system can hardly entirely follow the theories and methods of human resources administration but should be analyzed systematically with the introduction of theories and methods of knowledge management and their integration with traditional theories and methods of college faculty management. Only on such a basis can a system of college faculty management be established, management methods proposed, a comprehensive evaluation index system designed and assessment methods put forward.
     One, in this dissertation, the nature of college faculty is analyzed to be the production and transmission of knowledge. On the basis of the nature of college faculty management as well as the relationship between college faculty system and its exterior environment, this dissertation points out the inner factors that affect the holistic characteristics of faculty system. It also suggests that the main function of college faculty is to produce and transmit knowledge as well as to serve the society and, college teachers are, in nature, operators of knowledge. It puts forward the guidance and methods on how to strengthen the construction and management of college faculty system with knowledge management. The objectives, research methodology and key issues to be solved are also listed to address the current problems in this field.
     Two, a knowledge-based management system is proposed. From the perspective of knowledge science and system science, starting from the researches on knowledge input and knowledge output, this dissertation proposes a knowledge-based topological structure system of college faculty system which takes knowledge butterfly, knowledge pump, knowledge link, and knowledge network as its subjects, presents a new college faculty management system with knowledge input management, knowledge pump management, knowledge output management as its main content.
     Three, knowledge-based management methods are put forward. Analysis above suggests that the nature of college faculty management is the management of knowledge, and therefore knowledge-based management methods prove to be the leading management methods in college faculty management. According to the logic procedures of knowledge management, management methods of such activities as knowledge input, knowledge transmission, knowledge innovation, knowledge output and self-learning which cover all the main aspects of college faculty management are proposed.
     Four, a comprehensive knowledge-based evaluation system and the evaluation methods are established. Following the knowledge nature of college faculty's work, this dissertation proposes the principle, content and foundation of college faculty evaluation and relevant issues that need special attention, analyzes and researches the explicit and tacit evaluation index systems, and establishes a set of methods and a comprehensive system for college faculty evaluation.
     Thanks to years of experience of the author in HR in Dalian University of Technology, he could have some understanding of the management, and able to collect some evidence in this field. Hopefully, what he has done guided by knowledge science in this dissertation could have some significance to DUT HR management.
引文
[1] 周济.“历史性的跨越——世纪之交中国高等教育的改革与发展”.载《中国教育报,2002.7.11.
    [2] 陈昌贵.对“稳定我国高等教育发展规模”观念的质疑.高等教育研究.1995(1).
    [3] 宋丹,孙金伟.关于对创新及高层次创新人才的几点思考.辽宁教育研究,2004(8):41-43。
    [4] 林茂全,宋丹.论高等教育竞争战略.大连理工大学学报(社科版),2003(2):4-7。
    [5] 呼中陶,刘捷.建国50年高校教师队伍建设的回顾与思考.北京师范大学学报,1999(6):53-58.
    [6] 1978年教育部统计年鉴.
    [7] 1988年教育部统计年鉴.
    [8] 1998年教育部统计年鉴.
    [9] 教育部《2001年全国教育事业发展统计公报》.载《中国教育报》,2002.6.14,2001年版.
    [10] 《中国教育事业发展统计简况·2001》.2002.2.
    [11] Madin Trow. Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education. Conference on Future Structures of Post-sec-mdaxy Education, Paris 26th-29th June, 1973.
    [12] 许迈进,美国研究型大学师资管理特色管窥,高等工程教育研究,2003(5):60-63.
    [13] Romer Paul M. 1986: Increasing Returns and Long-Run Grown. Journal of Political Economy. 1994, 5.
    [14] K. Sveiby. Knowledge Management - Lessons from the Pioneers. On the web at: http://www.sveiby.com.au.
    [15] Karl M. Wiig. Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective. The Journal of Knowledge Management, 1997, Vol. 1, No. 1: 6-14.
    [16] Ikujiro Nonaka, Ryoko Toyama and Noboru Konno. SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning 33 (2000): 5-34.
    [17] Ikujiro Nonaka, Patrick Reinmoeller, Oai Senoo. Management Focus The 'ART' of Knowledge: Systems to Capitalize on Market Knowledge. European Management Journal, 1998, Vol. 16, No. 6: 673-684.
    [18] K. Sveiby. What is Knowledge Management. On the web at: http://www.sveiby.com.au.
    [19] Preece A, Flett A, Sleeman D, Curry D, Meany N and Perry P. Better Knowledge Management Through Knowledge Engineering. Intelligent Systems, IEEE [see also IEEE Expert], 2001, Volume 16, Issue 1: 36-43.
    [20] Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer, Hans-Peter Schnurr and York Sure. Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001, Volume 16, Issue 1: 26-34.
    [21] Colin Armistead. Knowledge Management And Process Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1999, Vol 3, No. 2: 143-154.
    [22] Jablonski S., Horn S. and Schlundt M. Process Oriented Knowledge Management. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering - Distributed Object Management - RIDE-DOM Apr 1-2 2001, IEEE Computer Society, Technical Committee on Data Engineering: 77-84.
    [23] Jacky Swan, Harry Scarbrough. Knowledge, Purpose And Process: Linking Knowledge Management And Innovation. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2001: 1-10.
    [24] Daniel E. O' Leary. Enterprise Knowledge Management. Computer, 1998, Volume 31, Issue 3: 54-61.
    [25] 夏昊翔.关于知识管理学科领域的一些考察与思考.管理科学与系统科学研究新进展——第6届全国青年管理科学与系统科学学术会议论文集,2001(大连):459-468.
    [26] Charles Despres and Daniele Chauvel. Knowledge Management (s). Journal of Knowledge management, 1999, Vol 3, No. 2: 110-120.
    [27] Karl M. Wiig. Comprehensive Knowledge Management. Working Dissertation Knowledge Research Institute, INC. #1999-4 Rev. 1.
    [28] Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, N. Y., Doubleday Anchor, 1967.
    [29] 白波,蒋永福.知识管理研究综述.情报资料工作,2001,(4).
    [30] 孙涛,知识管理.北京:中华工商联合出版社,1999:13.
    [31] 丁蔚.知识管理系统——建构学习型组织的工具.图书情报工作,2001,(6).
    [32] 吴明烈.知识管理的概念、策略及其对学习型组织的启示.组织学习与知识管理研究中心,2004.11.8,http://www.cko.com.cn/.
    [33] 邱均平,段宇锋.论知识管理与知识创新.中国图书馆学报,1999(3).
    [34] 盛小平.试析知识经济时代的知识管理.情报资料工作,1999(5).
    [35] 陈小让.知识管理:知识经济时代企业管理的新趋势.科技情报开发与经济,1998(6).
    [36] 褚峻.知识管理的资源性分析——基于企业微观层面.图书情报知识,2000.
    [37] 冯俊文.企业知识管理.软科学,2000(1).
    [38] 邱均平等.论知识管理与信息管理.中国图书馆学报,1999(6).
    [39] 王伟光,李继祥.知识管理:一种新的管理模式.社会科学辑刊,2000(2).
    [40] 朱晓峰,肖刚.知识管理基本概念探讨.情报科学,2000(2).
    [41] 王众托.知识系统工程:知识管理的新学科[J].大连理工大学学报,2000,40(S1):115-122
    [42] 尹继东.知识管理的主要层面和特点.企业经济,2000(1).
    [43] 吴锦旗.略论知识经济时代的知识管理.江西社会科学,2001(1).
    [44] 刘慎河.我国企业实施知识管理的若干思考.企业经济,2000(6).
    [45] 徐锐.知识型企业的知识管理特征.图书情报工作,2000(1).
    [46] 段尧清.论知识管理的职能及特征。科技进步与对策,2000(9).
    [47] 邱均平,马海群.再论知识管理与信息管理.图书情报工作,2000(10).
    [48] 王如富等.知识管理的职能及其与组织学习的关系.科研管理,1999(4).
    [49] 丁蔚.从信息管理到知识管理.情报学报,2000,19(2).
    [50] 邱均平,刘焕成等.论知识管理与企业重组.中国科技情报学报,2002,(3)
    [51] 陈锐.知识管理的实现思路与实现技术.图书情报知识,1999(1).
    [52] 乐飞红.企业知识管理实现流程中知识地图的几个问题.图书情报知识,2000(3).
    [53] OECD.以知识为基础的经济[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1997.
    [54] Winch G. Knowledge Management[J]. Manufacturing Engineer, 1999, 78 (4): 178-180.
    [55] 郭维森,党延忠.基于业务流程技术的企业过程性知识获取方法.中国管理科学,2002,10(6):53-58.
    [56] 王众托.知识系统工程.北京:科学出版社,2004.
    [57] 1998年10月5-9日在巴黎联合国教科文总部召开的世界高等教育大会上通过的《世界高等教育宣言》.
    [58] Madin Trow. Reflections on the Transition from Mass to Universal Higher Education, International Review of Education, No.1, 1972, pp. 61~63.
    [59] Martin Trow. Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education. Conference on Future Structures of Post-secondary Education, Paris 26th-29th June, 1973, 63~71.
    [60] Martin Trow. Elite and Mass Higher Education: American Models and European Realities, Contribution to the Conference on Research into Higher Education: Processes and Structures, June 12-16, 1978, Dalaro, Sweden. pp. 4-5a.
    [61] Martin Trow. On Mass Higher Education and Institutional Diversity. Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, May 30, 2003.
    [62] Martin Trow. From mass higher education to universal access, Dissertation of the meeting of the Japanese Society for Higher Education Research, Hiroshima, May 31, 1998, p. 1.
    [63] 陈锡章,裴兆宏.永恒的主题-大学师资队伍建设的思考.科学出版社,2000.
    [64] 黄海泉.21世纪高校教师队伍发展战略与对策思考.国家高级教育行政学院学报,2001(1):39-41.
    [65] 陈明磊.高校师资队伍可持续发展研究.人才开发.2004(8):24-25.
    [66] 肖刚,洪晓军.新时期高校师资队伍建设的思考与对策.中国高校师资研究,2005(2):42-46.
    [67] 李忠波.对高校师资队伍建设的理性思考.中国高教研究,2005(11):71-72.
    [68] 周鹤林,汪安佑.知识经济时代人力资源管理的特点与高校科技管理创新.科学管理研究,2002,20(5):53-57.
    [69] 张巧平.高校教师队伍师资管理新模式建构问题探析.广西师范学院学报(社会科学版),2002(10):117-120.
    [70] 张建祥.论高校人事管理向人力资源管理的转变.兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2002,30(2):162-165.
    [71][77] 断根良.对高校人力资源开发与管理的几点认识和思考.西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2002.22(4).73-76.
    [72] 崔沪.高校人力资源成本管理对策探讨.经济师,2003(2):102-103.
    [73] 裴兆宏,周月红.促进高校人事管理向人力资源开发.清华大学教育研究,1999(4):118-120.
    [74][75] Evalution and Education: at quarter century. University of Chicago Press, 1991.
    [76] 洪江如,赵斌.高校人力资源管理中的模糊综合评判.运筹与管理,2001,10(2):163-166.
    [78] 朱家芙,李春梅.中西方青年教师管理工作比较研究.天津大学学报(社会科学版),2002,2(2):155-160.
    [79] 葛荃,吴量福.从“高薪招贤”看高等教育师资队伍建设—中美两国比较研究.开放时代,2004(1)):91-106.
    [80] 熊卫华,吴振球.中西高等学校师资队伍学缘结构比较研究.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2003,3(2):56-59.
    [81] 刘建勋.建立适合高校知识型员工的人力资源管理模式.唐都学刊,2003(4):127-129.
    [82] 王健.促进教师个人知识共享的学校知识管理策略.教育理论与实践,2005,25(8):1-3.
    [83] 沈雪莱,陈伟杰.基于知识管理的教师专业发展.教育探索,2005(10):35-37.
    [84] 周福盛,周庆.教师知识管理:基于个体知识的观点.图书馆理论与实践,2005(6):49-51.
    [85] 胡泽平,施琴芬.高校教师隐性知识的结构与转化因素分析.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):80-85.
    [86] 《中国教育事业发展统计简况·2002》,2003.2.
    [87] Martin Trow. From mass higher education to universal access, Dissertation of the meeting of the Japanese Society for Higher Education Research, Hiroshima, May 31, 1998, p. 1.
    [88] 宋丹,纪红.高等教育服务应注意的几个问题,辽宁教育研究,2004年第7期,24-26.
    [89] 管培俊.面向21世纪高等学校教师队伍建设的思考与展望.教育人事,2000(3):1-9.
    [90] 林崇德,申继亮,辛涛.教师素质构成及其培养途径.中国教育学刊,1996(6):43-45.
    [91] 陈向明.实践性知识:教师专业发展的知识基础.北京大学教育评论,2003(1):105.
    [92] 孙红.人力资源管理:高校师资管理的重要理念.高教论坛,2004(2):143-148.
    [93] 宋丹,党延忠.高等学校现代师资管理模式探析.大连理工大学学报(社科版),2005(3):67-71.
    [94] 徐芳.团队绩效测评技术与实践.中国人民大学出版社,2003.
    [95] 彭剑锋,饶征.基于能力的人力资源管理.中国人民大学出版社,2003.
    [96] 宋丹,党延忠.论高校师资队伍知识管理体系.辽宁师范大学学报(社科版),2006(4):78-81.
    [97] 钟叔河.过去的大学.长江文艺出版社,2005.
    [98][99] 智效民.八位大学校长.长江文艺出版社,1999.
    [100] 黄忠敬.从国际高等教育大众化看我国高校扩招政策.教育网站,2001—6.5.
    [101] 刘群.怎么看与怎么干——对1300名高校教师与干部情况的调查与分析.高等教育,1999(4):15-18.
    [102][103] 陶爱珠主编.世界一流大学研究.上海交通大学出版社,1993.
    [104] 王洪斌.大学教师学.职工教育出版社,1988.
    [105] 王如哲.知识管理的理论和应用.中国台北:五南图书,2006(31):64.
    [106] 宋丹,周福战.高校教师评价的若干思考.辽宁教育研究,2004(6):84-86.
    [107] 欧兆虎.知识管理与知识评价.图书情报知识,2006(3):100-103.
    [108] 王前,李作学,金福.基于我国传统思维方式的个体隐性知识评价指标分析.科技进步与对策,2005(7):37-39.
    [109] 徐维祥.信息系统项目评价理论与方法.电子科技大学出版社,2001(7):74-75.
    [110] 刘树,李荣平,李林杰.科技进步综合评价研究.河北大学出版社,2000(8):37-38.
    [111] 姜伏莲,张丽.普通高校教师评价指标体系.泉州师范学院学报(社会科学),2004,22(1):21-25.
    [112] 马传普,王刚,任文涛.高校教师教学质量评价体系探讨.沈阳农业大学学报(社会科学版),2000,2(2):116-119.
    [113] 其木格,峻峰.高校教师综合能力评价指标体系的研究.内蒙古师大学报(哲学社会科学版),1998,2(2):114-118.
    [114] 董培健.对现行教师评价体系的几点思考.沈阳大学学报,2003,15(2):92-94.
    [115] 张济顺.教师评价与学术道德建设.中国教育和科研计算机网,2002.
    [116][122] 大连理工大学二00三年教师及专业技术职务评聘工作实施意见,2003.
    [117][123] 侯定丕,王战军.非线性评估的理论探索与应用.中国科技大学出版社,2001(1):24-25.
    [118] 李作学,王前,齐艳霞.员工隐性知识的识别及模糊综合评判.科技管理研究,2006(5):179-182.
    [119] 文东茅.中美著名大学规模与结构的比较.中国高教研究,2002(6):46-47
    [120] 大连理工大学报.2003.5.30(1074).
    [121] 陈春花,杨映珊.科研团队运作管理.科学出版社 2004.
    [124] Thomas L. Saaty, Luis G. Vargas. Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social and Technological Envieronments. University of Pittsburgh, 1994.
    [125] 刘新宪 朱道立.选择与判断——AHP(层次分析法)决策.上海科学普及出版社,1998:11-12.
    [126] 赵焕臣 许树柏 和金生.层次分析法——一种简易的新决策方法.科学出版社,1986.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700