司法公信力研究
摘要
时下,人们都在议论司法信用危机,并把它看作社会信用危机最为突出和严重的部分。不要说普通老百姓,就是很多企业、事业单位都对打官司望而生畏,都对能否得到公正的裁决缺乏合理预期,都对判决能否及时、完整的执行丧失信心。司法的信用危机来源于司法公信力的下降和缺失。一个社会如果失去了司法公信力,这个社会的信用体系就会土崩瓦解。因此,必须深刻分析其原因,采取有力的措施,加快司法体制改革和综合建设,重建司法公信力。基于这种理性认识和强烈的责任感,作者选择司法公信力作为博士学位论文的主题。
本文通过从对“司法”及“司法权”的概念分析入手研究了作为司法权本质要素的司法公信力。本文的主要内容如下:司法与司法权的概念及其演化、公信力的解读、司法公信力的理论界说、司法公信力的生成基础、司法公信力的构成、司法公信力的功能、当代中国司法公信力的缺失及其动因和司法公信力的制度建构。当然司法公信力的建构之路漫长而艰辛,需要我们在司法改革、依法治国与建设社会主义和谐社会的大背景下不断探索,本文仅仅是一个开端,希望于我国的司法理论与实践不无裨益。
The public trust to the judicature is just like the belief to the law. The law lack of the belief is nominal, judicature lack of the public trust does not form the due authority and substantial results of legal relief, hardly produce visualize of legal equity and social just also. The public trust is the request of judicial intrinsic in logic, the natural meaning of the topic and its vitality guarantee, therefore the reform in the judicial system must take the construction of the public trust as the goal. According to the above-mentioned understanding, this text from analyzing concept and characteristics of judicial public faith force to commence, analyzes the judicial public faith force of our country to descend and reason of imperfection, and how rebuild the our country the judicial public faith force carried on the quest.
The whole article has eight chapters and divides into three parts.
The first part includes three chapters, the main content of this part is to explain and understand the concept including justice, jurisdiction, the public trust and the public trust of judicature, and takes it as the foundation in the whole discussion. Among them:
First chapter mainly discusses the concept and its evolution of judicature and the jurisdiction, which is the premise to study the public trust of judicature because it is the core and the essential factor of judicature and jurisdiction. The author thinks that the judicial essence belongs to one kind of belief rather than right or authority. But the jurisdiction composes of the judicial power, the judicial authority and the public trust of judicature, and has the characteristic of the passivity, the ending and the extensive participation, and so on. Moreover in the different historical period the jurisdiction own operations have shown that the public trust of judicature produces with the development historical inevitability from the judicial
power to the judicial authority and the public trust of judicature. Second chapter mainly reads the public trust. The author thinks that the public trust is ability of obtaining the trust when public power's main body associates with the public, and the public's psychological approval. It has its own special structure shape and the theory ownership. The public trust naturally belongs to public power while it contains the credit and the trust. It is institution society trust and a kind of resource of society credit, the public trust is the legal foundation of public power at one time. Third chapter mainly bounds the public trust of judicature in theory. The author thinks that the public trust of judicature is the concept of the dual dimension, and mainly refers to the dynamic between the judicature and the public, the balanced association of trust and mutual appraisement. Looks from the origin, the public trust of judicature emanates from the essential attribute of public power. The core part of the entrustment-agency relation between the public and power institution is the trust of the public to public power and the credit of the latter to the former, which is bilateral interactions process. In this chapter, the author studies three types of the public trust of judicature, namely the authority deterrent, the rational knowledge and the psychology approves, and six characteristics of it, namely the main body's interaction, the openness, the system, the resources and the valid. The second part also includes three chapters, this part mainly analyze the production foundation. This part is in theoretically an extension and continuation to the first part. Among them: Fourth chapter mainly researches into production foundation of the public trust of judicature. The public trust of judicature certainly isn't baseless productions, but needs a series of specific social conditions. The public trust of judicature will appear and develop step by step only if the condition as grounds possesses the possibility of being reality. The author has studied the social basis and the theoretical basis on which the public trust of judicature produces. The social basis mainly refers to dualistic separation between the nation and the society, the judicial democracy, the right culture and the market economic base under the democratic political system. And the author has mainly analyzed the theoretical foundation of the public trust of
judicature from the view of economics. The author thinks that the public trust of judicature is one of the intrinsic stipulations of jurisdiction, and it is obvious to all that the public trust of judicature brings the huge function, the income and the risk because of no credit is a judicial cost, is also a social huge cost, but this kind of cost is unworthy to pay. Fifth chapter mainly carries on the discussion to internal constitution of the public trust of judicature. The public trust of judicature is essential attribute of the modern jurisdiction, but jurisdiction itself couldn't certainly produce the public trust of judicature. The judicial male letter strength constitution premise lies in judicial the independence. The public trust of judicature at least contains four necessary intrinsic inscapes, including the judicial judgment, the judicial autonomy, the judgment's persuasion and the judicial sanction. But the analysis of internal constitution couldn't get rid of the analysis of the constitutional premise, the independence of judicature and the standard of judgment, and recognition and understanding to judicial equity and the judicial satisfaction. Sixth chapter mainly studies the function of the public trust of judicature. The author thinks that the public trust of judicature has the society control function, the judicial authority safeguards the function and the judicial belief cultivation function. The judicature is the important part of organic constitution of society control strengthens, moreover is a kind of necessary society control strengthens. The society control function of the public trust of judicature has the certain value, which refers to the positive significance obtained when the society control function of the public trust of judicature deals with the need and the benefit of the society and the individual. The society control function of the public trust of judicature safeguards the social order, promotes society's government by law, and has the function of institution guide. Outsides the society control function, the public trust of judicature also safeguards the judicial authority and raises the judicial belief. The third part includes two chapters, this part mainly researches into the shortage of the public trust of judicature and its cause, and studies the institutional construction of the public trust of judicature in our country. The purpose that I wish to reach by discussion of the public trust of judicature lies
in providing a theoretical support for the construction of the public trust of judicature in our country. Among them: Seventh chapter mainly discusses the shortage of the public trust of judicature and its reason in the contemporary China. It is true that the public trust of judicature is short in the current Chinese. We have analyzed the shortage's profound cause from analyzing the present situation of the public trust of judicature in China, also changed the practical concern from the theoretical research. The author discusses the cause of formation in the system and structure. The cause in the system mainly includes the following content in six aspects, namely that the localization of jurisdiction which is leaded to because the government controls the court; the administration of the court internal management and all levels of party committees' intervention; one government and two courtyards are hard to reach the balance; the boundary between the congress and the judicature isn't clear; the judge under system and the foundation of notion. In the transfer process of law, on one hand, the vicissitude of politic, economic and cultural provides the force for the establishment and the development of the public trust of judicature, on the other hand, also is the cause of the shortage of the public trust of judicature. Eighth chapter mainly discusses the institutional construction of the public trust of judicature. Because under the pure political moral context, the public trust of judicature has fallen into the scrape in the market economy, we only can seek a kind of institutional construction. The practice process of law is the modernization process of law, also is the irreversible process from the traditional law to the modern law gradually. Chinese society couldn't give birth to the modern law which corresponds to the market economy, democratic politics, therefore the practice of government by law must massively use for reference, absorb, even transplant western system design. In order to construct the public trust of judicature conforming to the request of the time, we must firstly establish the modern judicial idea conforming to the request of the time. Based on it, to redistribute judicial power resource causes the judicature to occupy the proper status in the power pattern, and guarantees it non-administration and non-localization; to reform the judicial judgment and the persuasive power personality carrier, judge and its system,
enables the judge to satisfy the request of the public and causes the trust of the public to the judge and the judicature; To carry out the reform of enforcement system causes that the enforcement of the judicature satisfies the intrinsic request of the judicial binding force, and maintains the public trust of judicature; to reconstruct the autonomic and heteronymous system of jurisdiction makes the jurisdiction operate in according to the anticipation in theory, and causes the public trust of judicature to become the true essence and the connotation. The road of the construction of the public trust of judicature is very long and difficult certainly, therefore we need explore and practice the road gradually under the judicial reform, the rule of law and the construction of socialism harmonious society's big background, this text is only a workbook in great investigation and practice.
本文通过从对“司法”及“司法权”的概念分析入手研究了作为司法权本质要素的司法公信力。本文的主要内容如下:司法与司法权的概念及其演化、公信力的解读、司法公信力的理论界说、司法公信力的生成基础、司法公信力的构成、司法公信力的功能、当代中国司法公信力的缺失及其动因和司法公信力的制度建构。当然司法公信力的建构之路漫长而艰辛,需要我们在司法改革、依法治国与建设社会主义和谐社会的大背景下不断探索,本文仅仅是一个开端,希望于我国的司法理论与实践不无裨益。
The public trust to the judicature is just like the belief to the law. The law lack of the belief is nominal, judicature lack of the public trust does not form the due authority and substantial results of legal relief, hardly produce visualize of legal equity and social just also. The public trust is the request of judicial intrinsic in logic, the natural meaning of the topic and its vitality guarantee, therefore the reform in the judicial system must take the construction of the public trust as the goal. According to the above-mentioned understanding, this text from analyzing concept and characteristics of judicial public faith force to commence, analyzes the judicial public faith force of our country to descend and reason of imperfection, and how rebuild the our country the judicial public faith force carried on the quest.
The whole article has eight chapters and divides into three parts.
The first part includes three chapters, the main content of this part is to explain and understand the concept including justice, jurisdiction, the public trust and the public trust of judicature, and takes it as the foundation in the whole discussion. Among them:
First chapter mainly discusses the concept and its evolution of judicature and the jurisdiction, which is the premise to study the public trust of judicature because it is the core and the essential factor of judicature and jurisdiction. The author thinks that the judicial essence belongs to one kind of belief rather than right or authority. But the jurisdiction composes of the judicial power, the judicial authority and the public trust of judicature, and has the characteristic of the passivity, the ending and the extensive participation, and so on. Moreover in the different historical period the jurisdiction own operations have shown that the public trust of judicature produces with the development historical inevitability from the judicial
power to the judicial authority and the public trust of judicature. Second chapter mainly reads the public trust. The author thinks that the public trust is ability of obtaining the trust when public power's main body associates with the public, and the public's psychological approval. It has its own special structure shape and the theory ownership. The public trust naturally belongs to public power while it contains the credit and the trust. It is institution society trust and a kind of resource of society credit, the public trust is the legal foundation of public power at one time. Third chapter mainly bounds the public trust of judicature in theory. The author thinks that the public trust of judicature is the concept of the dual dimension, and mainly refers to the dynamic between the judicature and the public, the balanced association of trust and mutual appraisement. Looks from the origin, the public trust of judicature emanates from the essential attribute of public power. The core part of the entrustment-agency relation between the public and power institution is the trust of the public to public power and the credit of the latter to the former, which is bilateral interactions process. In this chapter, the author studies three types of the public trust of judicature, namely the authority deterrent, the rational knowledge and the psychology approves, and six characteristics of it, namely the main body's interaction, the openness, the system, the resources and the valid. The second part also includes three chapters, this part mainly analyze the production foundation. This part is in theoretically an extension and continuation to the first part. Among them: Fourth chapter mainly researches into production foundation of the public trust of judicature. The public trust of judicature certainly isn't baseless productions, but needs a series of specific social conditions. The public trust of judicature will appear and develop step by step only if the condition as grounds possesses the possibility of being reality. The author has studied the social basis and the theoretical basis on which the public trust of judicature produces. The social basis mainly refers to dualistic separation between the nation and the society, the judicial democracy, the right culture and the market economic base under the democratic political system. And the author has mainly analyzed the theoretical foundation of the public trust of
judicature from the view of economics. The author thinks that the public trust of judicature is one of the intrinsic stipulations of jurisdiction, and it is obvious to all that the public trust of judicature brings the huge function, the income and the risk because of no credit is a judicial cost, is also a social huge cost, but this kind of cost is unworthy to pay. Fifth chapter mainly carries on the discussion to internal constitution of the public trust of judicature. The public trust of judicature is essential attribute of the modern jurisdiction, but jurisdiction itself couldn't certainly produce the public trust of judicature. The judicial male letter strength constitution premise lies in judicial the independence. The public trust of judicature at least contains four necessary intrinsic inscapes, including the judicial judgment, the judicial autonomy, the judgment's persuasion and the judicial sanction. But the analysis of internal constitution couldn't get rid of the analysis of the constitutional premise, the independence of judicature and the standard of judgment, and recognition and understanding to judicial equity and the judicial satisfaction. Sixth chapter mainly studies the function of the public trust of judicature. The author thinks that the public trust of judicature has the society control function, the judicial authority safeguards the function and the judicial belief cultivation function. The judicature is the important part of organic constitution of society control strengthens, moreover is a kind of necessary society control strengthens. The society control function of the public trust of judicature has the certain value, which refers to the positive significance obtained when the society control function of the public trust of judicature deals with the need and the benefit of the society and the individual. The society control function of the public trust of judicature safeguards the social order, promotes society's government by law, and has the function of institution guide. Outsides the society control function, the public trust of judicature also safeguards the judicial authority and raises the judicial belief. The third part includes two chapters, this part mainly researches into the shortage of the public trust of judicature and its cause, and studies the institutional construction of the public trust of judicature in our country. The purpose that I wish to reach by discussion of the public trust of judicature lies
in providing a theoretical support for the construction of the public trust of judicature in our country. Among them: Seventh chapter mainly discusses the shortage of the public trust of judicature and its reason in the contemporary China. It is true that the public trust of judicature is short in the current Chinese. We have analyzed the shortage's profound cause from analyzing the present situation of the public trust of judicature in China, also changed the practical concern from the theoretical research. The author discusses the cause of formation in the system and structure. The cause in the system mainly includes the following content in six aspects, namely that the localization of jurisdiction which is leaded to because the government controls the court; the administration of the court internal management and all levels of party committees' intervention; one government and two courtyards are hard to reach the balance; the boundary between the congress and the judicature isn't clear; the judge under system and the foundation of notion. In the transfer process of law, on one hand, the vicissitude of politic, economic and cultural provides the force for the establishment and the development of the public trust of judicature, on the other hand, also is the cause of the shortage of the public trust of judicature. Eighth chapter mainly discusses the institutional construction of the public trust of judicature. Because under the pure political moral context, the public trust of judicature has fallen into the scrape in the market economy, we only can seek a kind of institutional construction. The practice process of law is the modernization process of law, also is the irreversible process from the traditional law to the modern law gradually. Chinese society couldn't give birth to the modern law which corresponds to the market economy, democratic politics, therefore the practice of government by law must massively use for reference, absorb, even transplant western system design. In order to construct the public trust of judicature conforming to the request of the time, we must firstly establish the modern judicial idea conforming to the request of the time. Based on it, to redistribute judicial power resource causes the judicature to occupy the proper status in the power pattern, and guarantees it non-administration and non-localization; to reform the judicial judgment and the persuasive power personality carrier, judge and its system,
enables the judge to satisfy the request of the public and causes the trust of the public to the judge and the judicature; To carry out the reform of enforcement system causes that the enforcement of the judicature satisfies the intrinsic request of the judicial binding force, and maintains the public trust of judicature; to reconstruct the autonomic and heteronymous system of jurisdiction makes the jurisdiction operate in according to the anticipation in theory, and causes the public trust of judicature to become the true essence and the connotation. The road of the construction of the public trust of judicature is very long and difficult certainly, therefore we need explore and practice the road gradually under the judicial reform, the rule of law and the construction of socialism harmonious society's big background, this text is only a workbook in great investigation and practice.
引文
1、马克思著:《资本论》(第三卷),人民出版社,1998 年版。
2、恩格斯著:《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》,人民出版社,1972 年版。
3、列宁著:《国家与革命》,商务印书馆,1977 年版。
1、郑成良著:《法律之内的正义:一个关于司法公正的法律实证主义解读》,法律出版社,2002 年版。
2、张维迎著:《产权、政府与信誉》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001年版。
3、郑也夫著:《信任论》,中国广播电视出版社,2001 年版。
4、姚建宗著:《法治的生态环境》,山东人民出版社,2003 年版。
5、喻敬明、林均跃、孙杰著:《国家信用管理体系》,中国社会科学文献出版社,2000 年版。
6、洪文金、高路明著:《马克思信用和银行的理论与应用》,厦门大学出版社,1988 年版。
7、何效元著:《诚实信用原则与衡平法》,台北三民书局,1977 年版。
8、厉以宁著:《经济学的伦理问题》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1995年版。
9、高兆明著:《社会变革中的伦理秩序——当代中国伦理透视》,中国矿业大学出版社,1994 年版。
10、黄鉴辉著:《山西票号史》,山西经济出版社,1992 年版。
11、李仁玉著:《契约伦理与秩序创新:市场运行的法律文化思考》,北京大学出版社,1993 年版。
12、姚辉著:《民法的精神》,法律出版社,1999 年版。
13、林水波著:《宪法政治学》,台北元照出版有限公司,2002 年版。
14、黄奏胜著:《伦理与政治之整合与运作》,台北中央文物供应社,1982年版。
15、许国贤著:《伦理政治论——一个民主时代的反思》,台北扬智文化事业股份有限公司,1997 年版。
16、张海星等著:《国家信用》,东北财经大学出版社,2000 年版。
17、胡夏冰、冯仁强编:《司法公正与司法改革研究综述》,清华大学出版社,2001 年版。
18、董皞著:《司法解释论》,中国政法大学出版社,1999 年版。
19、杨一平著:《司法正义论》,法律出版社,1999 年版。
20、周良林著:《信用心理学论纲》,吉林人民出版社,1990 年版。
21、景汉朝著:《司法实践中的理论探索》,法律出版社,2003 年版。
22、顾培东著:《从经济改革到司法改革》,法律出版社,2003 年版。
23、北京大学法学院人权研究中心编:《司法公正与权利保障》,中国法制出版社,2001 年版。
24、胡伟著:《司法政治》,香港三联书店,1994 年版。
25、孙万胜著:《司法权的法理之维》,法律出版社,2002 年版。
26、苏永钦著:《司法改革的再改革》,台北月旦出版社,1998 年版。
27、龚祥瑞著:《西方国家司法制度》,北京大学出版社,1993 年版。
28、程竹汝著:《司法改革与政治发展》,中国社会科学出版社,2001 年版。
29、苏力著:《送法下乡——中国基层司法制度研究》,中国政法大学出版社,2000 年版。
30、郑也夫等著:《中国社会中的信任》,中国城市出版社,2003 年版。
31、林喆著:《权力腐败与权力制约》,法律出版社,1997 年版。
32、张文显著:《法哲学范畴研究》,中国政法大学出版社,2001 年版。
33、张维迎著:《企业的企业家——契约理论》,上海人民出版社,1995年版。
34、孙智英著:《信用问题的经济学分析》,中国城市出版社,2002 年版。
35、王利明著:《司法改革研究》,法律出版社,2001 年版。
36、刘立宪、谢鹏程著:《海外司法改革走向》,中国方正出版社,1999年版。
37、谢中立主编:《西方社会学名著提要》,江西人民出版社,1998 年版。
38、宋冰编:《程序、正义与现代化》,中国政法大学出版社,1998 年版。
39、季卫东著:《法治秩序的建构》,中国政法大学出版社,1999 年版。
40、季金华著:《司法权威论》,山东人民出版社,2004 年版。
41、肖扬主编:《当代司法体制》,中国政法大学出版社,1998 年版。
42、黄茂荣著:《法学方法与现代民法》,中国政法大学出版社,2001 年版。
1、[美]马歇尔著,叶元龙、郭家麟译:《货币、信用与商业》,商务印书馆,1986 年版。
2、[美]福山著,彭志华译:《信任——社会美德与创造经济繁荣》,海南出版社,2001 年版。
3、[美]诺斯著,厉以平译:《经济史上的结构和变革》,商务印书馆,1992年版。
4、[美] 科斯、哈特、斯蒂格利茨等著,李风圣译:《契约经济学》,经济科学出版社,1999 年版。
5、[美]彼得·布劳著,孙非、张黎勤译:《社会生活中的交换与权利》,华夏出版社,1988 年版。
6、[英]罗素著,肖薇译:《伦理学和政治学中的人类社会》,中国社会科学出版社,1992 年版。
7、[美]伯尔曼著,梁治平译:《法律与宗教》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991 年版。
8、[美]哈瑞森著,黄葳威译:《强国之路:文化因素对政治、经济的影响》,台北中正书局,1993 年版。
9、[美]尼古拉斯·亨利著,项龙等译:《公共行政与公共事务》,华夏出版社,2002 年版。
10、[美]康芒斯著,于树生译:《制度经济学》(上、下),商务印书馆,1997 年版。
11、[美]布坎南著,平新乔、莫扶民等译:《自由、市场与国家》,上海三联书店,1989 年版。
12、[美]卡多佐著,苏力译:《司法过程的性质》,商务印书馆,1998 年版。
13、[古希腊]亚里士多德著,吴寿彭译:《政治学》,商务印书馆,1965年版。
14、[法]托克维尔著,董果良译:《论美国的民主》(上),商务印书馆,1997 年版。
15、[德]汉斯·沃尔夫等著,高家伟译:《行政法》(第一卷),商务印书馆,2002 年版。
16、[美]汉密尔顿等著,程逢如等译:《联邦党人文集》,商务印书馆,1980年版。
17、[德]马克斯·韦伯著,林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上、下),商务印书馆,1997 年版。
18、[美]E·博登海默著,邓正来译:《法理学——法律哲学与法律方法》,中国政法大学出版社,1999 年版。
19、[美]埃尔曼著,高鸿钧、贺卫方译:《比较法律文化》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1990 年版。
20、[日]小岛武司编,汪祖兴译:《司法制度的历史与未来》,法律出版社, 2000 年版。
21、[日]棚赖孝雄著,王亚新译:《纠纷的解决与审判制度》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
22、[美]罗德里克·M·克雷默、汤姆·R·泰勒编,管兵等译:《组织中的信任》,中国城市出版社,2003 年版。
23、[美]伯纳德?巴伯著,牟斌等译:《信任——信任的逻辑和局限》,福建人民出版社,1989 年版。
24、[美]科尔曼著,邓方译:《社会理论的基础》,社会科学文献出版社,1999 年版。
25、[美]丹尼斯·郎著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001 年版。
26、[美]加布里埃?A?阿尔蒙德、宾厄姆?鲍威尔等著,曹沛霖等译:《比较政治学:体系、过程和政策》,上海译文出版社,1987 年版。
27、[美]科特威尔著,潘大松等译:《法律社会学导论》,华夏出版社,1989年版。
28、[美]亨廷顿著,王冠华等译:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1989 年版。
29、[美]诺内特、塞尔兹尼克著,张志铭译:《转变中的法律与社会——迈向回应型法》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
30、[德]哈贝马斯著,洪佩郁、蔺菁译:《交往行动理论》(第一卷),重庆出版社,1994 年版。
31、[美]昂格尔著,吴玉章、周汉华译:《现代社会中的法律》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
32、[日]川岛武宜著,申政武等译:《现代化与法》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
33、[美]德沃金著,信春鹰等译:《认真对待权利》,中国大百科全书出版社,1996 年版。
34、[英]梅因著,沈景一译:《古代法》,商务印书馆,1995 年版。
35、[美]波斯纳著,苏力译:《法理学问题》,中国政法大学出版社,1994年版。
36、[美]科斯著,胡庄君译:《社会成本问题》,载陈昕主编:《财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集》,上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1994 年版。
37、[法]孟德斯鸠著,张雁深译:《论法的精神》(上),商务印书馆,1961年版。
38、[英]p.s.阿蒂亚著,兆一等译:《法律与现代社会》,辽宁教育出版社,1998 年版。
39、[美]贝勒斯著,张文显等译:《法律的原则——一个规范的分析》,中国大百科全书出版社,1996 年版。
40、[美]劳伦斯·M·弗里德曼著,李琼英、林欣译:《法律制度——从社会科学角度观察》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
41、[美]伯尔曼著,贺卫方等译:《法律与革命》,中国大百科全书出版社,1993 年版。
42、[美]罗斯科·庞德著,沈宗灵、董世忠译:《通过法律的社会控制法律的任务》,商务印书馆,1984 年版。
43、[英]哈耶克著,邓正来译:《法律、立法与自由》(上),中国大百科全书出版社,2000 年版。
44、[美]罗斯著,秦志勇、毛永政等译:《社会控制》,华夏出版社,1989年版。
45、[奥地利]凯尔森著,沈宗灵译:《法与国家的一般理论》,中国大百科全书出版社,1995 年版。
46、[美]罗尔斯著,何怀宏等译:《正义论》,中国社会科学出版社,1997年版。
1、杨进:《论我国社会信用危机的法文化根源》,载《法学研究》2002年第4 期。
2、谢民:《信用:作为交易行为规范的概念分析》,载《前沿》2000 年第3 期。
3、郑也夫:《信任:溯源与定义》,载《北京社会科学》1999 年第4 期。
4、王列:《关于信任问题的新探讨》,载《国外理论动态》1998 年第8 期。
5、彭泗清:《信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段》,载《社会学研究》1999 年第2 期。
6、马中东:《浅析马克思信用理论及其现实性》,载《聊城师范学院学报》1999 年第2 期。
7、黄娟:《在“应然”与“实然”之间——司法的公信力及司法权运行过程中的“信息失真”》,载《湘潭大学社会科学学报》2002年第3期。
8、曹刚、戴木才:《论司法正义及其保障》,载《中共中央党校学报》2002年第2 期。
9、朱最新、刘云甫:《司法正义实现的要件探悉》,载《湖北社会科学》2003 年第3 期。
10、吴萍:《司法公正的制度基础》,载《行政与法》2004 年第3 期。
11、胡铁民、黎映桃:《司法公正之社会结构探微》,载《理论与改革》2004 年第1 期。
12、龚向和、胡楚舟:《论司法公正的伦理底蕴》,载《长白学刊》2003年第1 期。
13、董茂云:《司法独立:司法公正的重要制度保证》,载《中国法学》2003 年第1 期。
14、高其才等:《司法公正观念源流略论》,载《清华大学学报》2003 年第2 期。
15、周光明、王成荣:《语言哲学与司法公正》,载《探索》2003年第6 期。
16、张雯、张鲲:《法治、司法改革与法律共同体》,载《济南大学学报》2002 年第1 期。
17、谢佑平、万毅:《法律权威与司法创新:中国司法改革的合法性危机》,载《法制与社会发展》2003 年第1 期。
18、张卫平:《体制、观念与司法改革》,载《中国法学》2003 年第1 期。
19、徐国忠:《司法改革与司法独立》,载《华东政法学院学报》2000 年第2 期。
20、季金华、叶强:《程序正义:司法权威的基石》,载《南京社会科学》2003 年第9 期。
21、姚建宗:《信仰:法治的精神意蕴》,载《吉林大学社会科学学报》1997 年第2 期。
22、杨建顺:《公共选择理论与司法权的界限》,载《法学论坛》2003 年第3 期。
23、汪建成、孙远:《论司法的权威与权威的司法》,载《法学评论》2001年第4 期。
24、董皞:《司法功能与司法公正、司法权威》,载《政法论坛》2002 年第2 期。
25、左卫民、周长军:《司法独立新论》,载《四川大学学报》2003 年第5 期。
26、林钧跃:《美国信用管理的相关法律体系》,载《世界经济》2000 年第4 期。
27、田海平:《启蒙道德与契约精神——近代西方社会转型期伦理精神的重建》,载《浙江社会科学》1999 年第1 期。
28、姜迎春:《契约伦理与道德责任——中西道德责任观之比较》,载《淮阴师范学院学报》1999 年第1 期。
29、刘可为:《从山西票号的衰亡探析企业的经营与制度创新》,载《管理世界》1997 年第4 期。
30、魏吉华:《论法律信用》,载《政治与法律》2000 年第4 期。
31、季金华:《司法权威的结构解析》,载《学习与探索》2002 年第5 期。
32、马新彦:《信赖与信赖利益考》,载《法律科学》2000 年第3 期。
33、张华:《信用危机与东方文化——金融危机的另一种诠释》,载《经济评论》2001 年第1 期。
34、谢渡扬:《我国信用秩序与法制保障》,载《管理世界》2001年第1 期。
35、罗德刚:《行政伦理的基础价值观:公正和正义》,载《社会科学研究》2002 年第3 期。
36、亚当?塞利格曼著,陈家刚译:《信任与公民社会》,载《马克思主义与现实》2002 年第5 期。
37、戚攻:《转型期“信任”重建的社会学分析》,载《探索》2003 年第5 期。
1、Schotter, Andre, The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge University Press, 1981.
2、Harold J. Spaeth, Supreme Court Policy Making, H. Freeman and Company,1979.
3、Livinston Armytage, Ednacating Judges:towards a new wards a new model of continuing judicial learning,The Hague Kluwer Inernational, 1996.
4、R·H·Coase, The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Licensed by the University of Chicago Press, 1988.
5、Oliver E. Williamson: The Economics of Organization: A Transaction Cost Approach, American Journal of Sociology, L87.
6、Tom B Tyler, What is procedural Justice, Law and Society Review 22(1988).
7、Solomon Freehof, The Natural Law in the Jewish Tradition ,University of Notre Dame Natural Law Institute Proceedings, vol.15.
2、恩格斯著:《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》,人民出版社,1972 年版。
3、列宁著:《国家与革命》,商务印书馆,1977 年版。
1、郑成良著:《法律之内的正义:一个关于司法公正的法律实证主义解读》,法律出版社,2002 年版。
2、张维迎著:《产权、政府与信誉》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001年版。
3、郑也夫著:《信任论》,中国广播电视出版社,2001 年版。
4、姚建宗著:《法治的生态环境》,山东人民出版社,2003 年版。
5、喻敬明、林均跃、孙杰著:《国家信用管理体系》,中国社会科学文献出版社,2000 年版。
6、洪文金、高路明著:《马克思信用和银行的理论与应用》,厦门大学出版社,1988 年版。
7、何效元著:《诚实信用原则与衡平法》,台北三民书局,1977 年版。
8、厉以宁著:《经济学的伦理问题》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1995年版。
9、高兆明著:《社会变革中的伦理秩序——当代中国伦理透视》,中国矿业大学出版社,1994 年版。
10、黄鉴辉著:《山西票号史》,山西经济出版社,1992 年版。
11、李仁玉著:《契约伦理与秩序创新:市场运行的法律文化思考》,北京大学出版社,1993 年版。
12、姚辉著:《民法的精神》,法律出版社,1999 年版。
13、林水波著:《宪法政治学》,台北元照出版有限公司,2002 年版。
14、黄奏胜著:《伦理与政治之整合与运作》,台北中央文物供应社,1982年版。
15、许国贤著:《伦理政治论——一个民主时代的反思》,台北扬智文化事业股份有限公司,1997 年版。
16、张海星等著:《国家信用》,东北财经大学出版社,2000 年版。
17、胡夏冰、冯仁强编:《司法公正与司法改革研究综述》,清华大学出版社,2001 年版。
18、董皞著:《司法解释论》,中国政法大学出版社,1999 年版。
19、杨一平著:《司法正义论》,法律出版社,1999 年版。
20、周良林著:《信用心理学论纲》,吉林人民出版社,1990 年版。
21、景汉朝著:《司法实践中的理论探索》,法律出版社,2003 年版。
22、顾培东著:《从经济改革到司法改革》,法律出版社,2003 年版。
23、北京大学法学院人权研究中心编:《司法公正与权利保障》,中国法制出版社,2001 年版。
24、胡伟著:《司法政治》,香港三联书店,1994 年版。
25、孙万胜著:《司法权的法理之维》,法律出版社,2002 年版。
26、苏永钦著:《司法改革的再改革》,台北月旦出版社,1998 年版。
27、龚祥瑞著:《西方国家司法制度》,北京大学出版社,1993 年版。
28、程竹汝著:《司法改革与政治发展》,中国社会科学出版社,2001 年版。
29、苏力著:《送法下乡——中国基层司法制度研究》,中国政法大学出版社,2000 年版。
30、郑也夫等著:《中国社会中的信任》,中国城市出版社,2003 年版。
31、林喆著:《权力腐败与权力制约》,法律出版社,1997 年版。
32、张文显著:《法哲学范畴研究》,中国政法大学出版社,2001 年版。
33、张维迎著:《企业的企业家——契约理论》,上海人民出版社,1995年版。
34、孙智英著:《信用问题的经济学分析》,中国城市出版社,2002 年版。
35、王利明著:《司法改革研究》,法律出版社,2001 年版。
36、刘立宪、谢鹏程著:《海外司法改革走向》,中国方正出版社,1999年版。
37、谢中立主编:《西方社会学名著提要》,江西人民出版社,1998 年版。
38、宋冰编:《程序、正义与现代化》,中国政法大学出版社,1998 年版。
39、季卫东著:《法治秩序的建构》,中国政法大学出版社,1999 年版。
40、季金华著:《司法权威论》,山东人民出版社,2004 年版。
41、肖扬主编:《当代司法体制》,中国政法大学出版社,1998 年版。
42、黄茂荣著:《法学方法与现代民法》,中国政法大学出版社,2001 年版。
1、[美]马歇尔著,叶元龙、郭家麟译:《货币、信用与商业》,商务印书馆,1986 年版。
2、[美]福山著,彭志华译:《信任——社会美德与创造经济繁荣》,海南出版社,2001 年版。
3、[美]诺斯著,厉以平译:《经济史上的结构和变革》,商务印书馆,1992年版。
4、[美] 科斯、哈特、斯蒂格利茨等著,李风圣译:《契约经济学》,经济科学出版社,1999 年版。
5、[美]彼得·布劳著,孙非、张黎勤译:《社会生活中的交换与权利》,华夏出版社,1988 年版。
6、[英]罗素著,肖薇译:《伦理学和政治学中的人类社会》,中国社会科学出版社,1992 年版。
7、[美]伯尔曼著,梁治平译:《法律与宗教》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991 年版。
8、[美]哈瑞森著,黄葳威译:《强国之路:文化因素对政治、经济的影响》,台北中正书局,1993 年版。
9、[美]尼古拉斯·亨利著,项龙等译:《公共行政与公共事务》,华夏出版社,2002 年版。
10、[美]康芒斯著,于树生译:《制度经济学》(上、下),商务印书馆,1997 年版。
11、[美]布坎南著,平新乔、莫扶民等译:《自由、市场与国家》,上海三联书店,1989 年版。
12、[美]卡多佐著,苏力译:《司法过程的性质》,商务印书馆,1998 年版。
13、[古希腊]亚里士多德著,吴寿彭译:《政治学》,商务印书馆,1965年版。
14、[法]托克维尔著,董果良译:《论美国的民主》(上),商务印书馆,1997 年版。
15、[德]汉斯·沃尔夫等著,高家伟译:《行政法》(第一卷),商务印书馆,2002 年版。
16、[美]汉密尔顿等著,程逢如等译:《联邦党人文集》,商务印书馆,1980年版。
17、[德]马克斯·韦伯著,林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上、下),商务印书馆,1997 年版。
18、[美]E·博登海默著,邓正来译:《法理学——法律哲学与法律方法》,中国政法大学出版社,1999 年版。
19、[美]埃尔曼著,高鸿钧、贺卫方译:《比较法律文化》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1990 年版。
20、[日]小岛武司编,汪祖兴译:《司法制度的历史与未来》,法律出版社, 2000 年版。
21、[日]棚赖孝雄著,王亚新译:《纠纷的解决与审判制度》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
22、[美]罗德里克·M·克雷默、汤姆·R·泰勒编,管兵等译:《组织中的信任》,中国城市出版社,2003 年版。
23、[美]伯纳德?巴伯著,牟斌等译:《信任——信任的逻辑和局限》,福建人民出版社,1989 年版。
24、[美]科尔曼著,邓方译:《社会理论的基础》,社会科学文献出版社,1999 年版。
25、[美]丹尼斯·郎著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001 年版。
26、[美]加布里埃?A?阿尔蒙德、宾厄姆?鲍威尔等著,曹沛霖等译:《比较政治学:体系、过程和政策》,上海译文出版社,1987 年版。
27、[美]科特威尔著,潘大松等译:《法律社会学导论》,华夏出版社,1989年版。
28、[美]亨廷顿著,王冠华等译:《变化社会中的政治秩序》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1989 年版。
29、[美]诺内特、塞尔兹尼克著,张志铭译:《转变中的法律与社会——迈向回应型法》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
30、[德]哈贝马斯著,洪佩郁、蔺菁译:《交往行动理论》(第一卷),重庆出版社,1994 年版。
31、[美]昂格尔著,吴玉章、周汉华译:《现代社会中的法律》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
32、[日]川岛武宜著,申政武等译:《现代化与法》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
33、[美]德沃金著,信春鹰等译:《认真对待权利》,中国大百科全书出版社,1996 年版。
34、[英]梅因著,沈景一译:《古代法》,商务印书馆,1995 年版。
35、[美]波斯纳著,苏力译:《法理学问题》,中国政法大学出版社,1994年版。
36、[美]科斯著,胡庄君译:《社会成本问题》,载陈昕主编:《财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集》,上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1994 年版。
37、[法]孟德斯鸠著,张雁深译:《论法的精神》(上),商务印书馆,1961年版。
38、[英]p.s.阿蒂亚著,兆一等译:《法律与现代社会》,辽宁教育出版社,1998 年版。
39、[美]贝勒斯著,张文显等译:《法律的原则——一个规范的分析》,中国大百科全书出版社,1996 年版。
40、[美]劳伦斯·M·弗里德曼著,李琼英、林欣译:《法律制度——从社会科学角度观察》,中国政法大学出版社,1994 年版。
41、[美]伯尔曼著,贺卫方等译:《法律与革命》,中国大百科全书出版社,1993 年版。
42、[美]罗斯科·庞德著,沈宗灵、董世忠译:《通过法律的社会控制法律的任务》,商务印书馆,1984 年版。
43、[英]哈耶克著,邓正来译:《法律、立法与自由》(上),中国大百科全书出版社,2000 年版。
44、[美]罗斯著,秦志勇、毛永政等译:《社会控制》,华夏出版社,1989年版。
45、[奥地利]凯尔森著,沈宗灵译:《法与国家的一般理论》,中国大百科全书出版社,1995 年版。
46、[美]罗尔斯著,何怀宏等译:《正义论》,中国社会科学出版社,1997年版。
1、杨进:《论我国社会信用危机的法文化根源》,载《法学研究》2002年第4 期。
2、谢民:《信用:作为交易行为规范的概念分析》,载《前沿》2000 年第3 期。
3、郑也夫:《信任:溯源与定义》,载《北京社会科学》1999 年第4 期。
4、王列:《关于信任问题的新探讨》,载《国外理论动态》1998 年第8 期。
5、彭泗清:《信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段》,载《社会学研究》1999 年第2 期。
6、马中东:《浅析马克思信用理论及其现实性》,载《聊城师范学院学报》1999 年第2 期。
7、黄娟:《在“应然”与“实然”之间——司法的公信力及司法权运行过程中的“信息失真”》,载《湘潭大学社会科学学报》2002年第3期。
8、曹刚、戴木才:《论司法正义及其保障》,载《中共中央党校学报》2002年第2 期。
9、朱最新、刘云甫:《司法正义实现的要件探悉》,载《湖北社会科学》2003 年第3 期。
10、吴萍:《司法公正的制度基础》,载《行政与法》2004 年第3 期。
11、胡铁民、黎映桃:《司法公正之社会结构探微》,载《理论与改革》2004 年第1 期。
12、龚向和、胡楚舟:《论司法公正的伦理底蕴》,载《长白学刊》2003年第1 期。
13、董茂云:《司法独立:司法公正的重要制度保证》,载《中国法学》2003 年第1 期。
14、高其才等:《司法公正观念源流略论》,载《清华大学学报》2003 年第2 期。
15、周光明、王成荣:《语言哲学与司法公正》,载《探索》2003年第6 期。
16、张雯、张鲲:《法治、司法改革与法律共同体》,载《济南大学学报》2002 年第1 期。
17、谢佑平、万毅:《法律权威与司法创新:中国司法改革的合法性危机》,载《法制与社会发展》2003 年第1 期。
18、张卫平:《体制、观念与司法改革》,载《中国法学》2003 年第1 期。
19、徐国忠:《司法改革与司法独立》,载《华东政法学院学报》2000 年第2 期。
20、季金华、叶强:《程序正义:司法权威的基石》,载《南京社会科学》2003 年第9 期。
21、姚建宗:《信仰:法治的精神意蕴》,载《吉林大学社会科学学报》1997 年第2 期。
22、杨建顺:《公共选择理论与司法权的界限》,载《法学论坛》2003 年第3 期。
23、汪建成、孙远:《论司法的权威与权威的司法》,载《法学评论》2001年第4 期。
24、董皞:《司法功能与司法公正、司法权威》,载《政法论坛》2002 年第2 期。
25、左卫民、周长军:《司法独立新论》,载《四川大学学报》2003 年第5 期。
26、林钧跃:《美国信用管理的相关法律体系》,载《世界经济》2000 年第4 期。
27、田海平:《启蒙道德与契约精神——近代西方社会转型期伦理精神的重建》,载《浙江社会科学》1999 年第1 期。
28、姜迎春:《契约伦理与道德责任——中西道德责任观之比较》,载《淮阴师范学院学报》1999 年第1 期。
29、刘可为:《从山西票号的衰亡探析企业的经营与制度创新》,载《管理世界》1997 年第4 期。
30、魏吉华:《论法律信用》,载《政治与法律》2000 年第4 期。
31、季金华:《司法权威的结构解析》,载《学习与探索》2002 年第5 期。
32、马新彦:《信赖与信赖利益考》,载《法律科学》2000 年第3 期。
33、张华:《信用危机与东方文化——金融危机的另一种诠释》,载《经济评论》2001 年第1 期。
34、谢渡扬:《我国信用秩序与法制保障》,载《管理世界》2001年第1 期。
35、罗德刚:《行政伦理的基础价值观:公正和正义》,载《社会科学研究》2002 年第3 期。
36、亚当?塞利格曼著,陈家刚译:《信任与公民社会》,载《马克思主义与现实》2002 年第5 期。
37、戚攻:《转型期“信任”重建的社会学分析》,载《探索》2003 年第5 期。
1、Schotter, Andre, The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge University Press, 1981.
2、Harold J. Spaeth, Supreme Court Policy Making, H. Freeman and Company,1979.
3、Livinston Armytage, Ednacating Judges:towards a new wards a new model of continuing judicial learning,The Hague Kluwer Inernational, 1996.
4、R·H·Coase, The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Licensed by the University of Chicago Press, 1988.
5、Oliver E. Williamson: The Economics of Organization: A Transaction Cost Approach, American Journal of Sociology, L87.
6、Tom B Tyler, What is procedural Justice, Law and Society Review 22(1988).
7、Solomon Freehof, The Natural Law in the Jewish Tradition ,University of Notre Dame Natural Law Institute Proceedings, vol.15.