城镇职工健康体检服务包研制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
健康体检是面向社会绝大多数没有主观症状的受检者通过医学检查,尽可能的发现不易觉察的疾病或疾病隐患,从而达到有病早治,无病早防的目的。健康体检是健康管理的重要途径,是现代人对健康本质认识的不断深化,注重健康思维的充分体现。健康水平的提高和健康消费的发展也是社会发展、社会文明的重要标志。通过定期健康体检可以早期发现潜在的疾病,及时予以治疗;早期了解健康指标,监测身体各项功能状态的变化;早期改变不良生活、工作习惯,避免危险因子诱发健康问题。规范和有效的健康体检可以实现双重效益,即社会效益和经济效益。社会效益主要体现在健康体检可以促进个人健康,提高全民健康素质。经济效益主要体现在健康体检可以减轻个人医疗负担,节省医疗费用支出;盘活医院资源,增加医院效益;拉动健康内需,促进经济发展,推动健康产业。
     目前,国外对体检资料的研究较多的是如何做好健康管理,如何利用健康体检数据库构建健康风险评估(health risk appraisal HRA)体系预测疾病或死亡风险等,尚未见健康体检服务包研制的相关研究。我国健康体检的历史,虽然只有短短的20年,但已经形成了初具规模的“健康体检市场”。目前国内对体检资料的研究多是对个人健康状况调查结果的分析与评估,或对每年的健康体检结果的检出率、患病率的统计或相关因素的分析,也未见对健康体检服务包的系统研究。然而,在健康体检产业的发展过程中,无论是其市场运行机制还是其体检服务内容的科学性等方面,均存在许多问题。例如,卫生主管部门尚未把健康体检列入综合医院服务范围,体检中心定位不明确,缺乏相应的管理办法;各健康体检机构没有规范的运行模式,其规模、场所、设备、体检项目、服务水平等均没有相应的行业标准;许多健康体检中心服务单一、价格昂贵,辖区内一般居民无机会利用。更为突出的是许多健康体检机构推出的形式多样的“健康体检套餐”,这些套餐主要是以盈利为目的,根据自身开设的体检项目及服务价格并结合体检对象的需求和支付能力来制定,缺乏严格的科学依据,没有考虑到利用现有检查手段最大限度的检出疾病及阳性提示,也未针对不同性别不同年龄组和疾病谱的变化制定不同层次的健康体检服务包。
     本研究遵循体检服务提供方和体检服务需求方利益最大化原则,从实际出发,依据世界卫生组织健康体检项目选择建议,结合流行病学、临床医学、卫生经济学等学科理论,利用医学统计学方法,制定不同层次、不同需求的健康体检服务包。本研究以山东省某省级综合医院体检中心城镇职工健康体检数据为基础建立研究数据库,以城镇职工为目标人群,提出两个健康体检服务包的研制方案。第一个方案特需健康体检服务包:按照国际疾病分类标准ICD-10,基于疾病、阳性提示概率分布和人体解剖系统分类疾病谱研制的系统体检服务包,按人体解剖系统确定体检项目,研制系统健康体检服务包。第二个方案基本健康体检服务包:按照国际疾病分类标准ICD-10,基于疾病、阳性提示概率分布和系统聚类方法,研制分性别、年龄健康体检服务包。根据疾病或阳性提示在目标人群中的描述流行病学分析,进行分层设计:首先将样本按性别分为男性和女性两个亚群体,然后分别在男性和女性的两个群体中采用聚类分析,以疾病及阳性提示的年龄别检出率为聚类指标对年龄组进行聚类,划分体检服务包的层次。本研究的总目标为通过服务包的研制规范体检市场,提高体检质量和效率,保证体检结论的真实性和可靠性,使体检收费公开、透明、规范,进而为政府部门制定科学的健康体检产业法律、法规提供科学依据。
     研究结果:
     1、基于人体解剖系统的特需健康体检服务包
     按照国际疾病分类标准ICD-10,基于疾病、阳性提示概率分布和人体解剖系统分类疾病谱研制了9个特需健康体检服务包:呼吸系统、循环系统、消化系统(肝、胆、胰、脾服务包和胃、肠服务包)、泌尿系统、血液系统、内分泌代谢系统、神经骨骼系统、妇科、男科体检服务包。体检项目价格严格按照山东省物价局标准统一定价。
     2、基于性别、年龄、疾病谱的基本健康体检服务包
     按照国际疾病分类标准ICD-10,基于疾病、阳性提示概率分布和系统聚类方法,研制了10个性别、年龄分层基本体检服务包:
     (1)4个男性健康体检服务包:男性40岁以下健康体检服务包,男性40岁~49岁健康体检服务包,男性50岁~59岁健康体检服务包,男性60岁以上健康体检服务包。
     (2)6个女性健康体检服务包:女性30岁以下健康体检服务包,女性30岁~39岁健康体检服务包,女性40岁~49岁健康体检服务包,女性50岁~54岁健康体检服务包,女性55岁~64岁健康体检服务包,女性65岁以上健康体检服务包。
     每个年龄组健康体检服务包中,依据疾病或阳性提示在目标群体中的发生概率的高低又分为A、B、C三个层次。服务包A定义为基础体检服务包,对机体确实需要检查或经济实力允许的体检对象可自由组合服务包A、B、C。若选择服务包组合,组合中的项目不重复收费。
     研究结论:
     1、按照国际疾病分类标准ICD-10,基于疾病、阳性提示概率分布和人体解剖系统研制了9个特需健康体检服务包满足了不同体检对象的需求。
     2、按照国际疾病分类标准ICD-10,基于疾病、阳性提示概率分布和系统聚类方法研制的分层基本健康体检服务包以性别、年龄作为服务包分层的标准,增加了服务包的可操作性。
     3、本研究制定的城镇职工健康体检服务包具有一定的适用性和推广应用价值,既兼顾了体检服务提供方的利益也充分考虑了体检服务需求方利益。
     4、本研究通过城镇职工健康体检服务包的研制,为各类体检人群体检服务包的制定提供了基本思路和方法。
     建议:
     1、卫生主管部门应当重视体检服务包的研究工作,为规范健康体检市场创造条件。
     2、健康体检机构应总结和评价服务包的使用效果,能够从体检的成本和效率等角度选择适宜的服务包,提高健康体检的服务水平。
     3、健康体检机构应重视体检信息的收集、整理和分析工作。
     4、在规范健康体检服务包的基础上,宣传健康体检的重要性,加大政府投入,增强居民健康投资意识,提倡健康体检与健康保险结合,提高健康体检的利用率,充分发挥体检机构为大众健康服务的作用。
     5、进一步评价健康体检服务包的效益,开展支付意愿调查分析。
Physical examination is referred as a tool packages to detect the unobservable disease or the latent period of disease among the people who objectively have no symptom. The aims are to treat the detected diseases as soon as possible on the one hand, and to prevent illness on the other hand. It is an important health care management method to understand the nature of health in peoples' daily life and to pay attention to improve the healthy behavior. In addition, the improvement of health and health status are an important symbol to present social development and social civilization. The goal of physical examination is to find the potential disease earlier in order to treat and cure the disease as soon as possible; to screen various healthy indicators and then measure the change of various physical functions of a person; to intervene the life behavior to prevent the risk factors affecting health. The criterion and effective physical examination could achieve both social benefit and economic benefit. In other words, social benefit means the improvement of an individual's health and then lead to the improvement of population health. In addition, economic benefit represents the reduced health expenditures of an individual; the effective reallocation of hospital resource. These could lead to improve the demand for health and then promote the health care industries.
     At present, the international literature shows that the research of physical examination are focused on how to well manage the physical examination, and the use of physical examination database to establish health risk appraisal system to forecast disease or the risk of mortality. However, there is no detailed research on the physical examination package in China. Although the history of physical examination is just about 20 years, it has growing to a relatively large market for physical examination. So far, the current research for the physical examination is just to the analysis and evaluation of an individual's health status, or to the factor analysis such as prevalence and mobility rate. There is little research to systematically analyze the physical examination package. In addition, there are still some occurred problems as such the business plan and content of the package in the process of developing the physical examination industry. For example, the integration of physical examination into the boundary of hospital services was not permitted by health authorities. This leads to the objective of physical examination is not clear and then to relevant less managerial method; to nonindustrial standard in accordance with business module, location, equipment, physical examination items, and service level; to less service provided to the general population due to less service item provided and relative expensive prices. In particular, the "combination of physical examination items" provided by hospitals and/or institutions are for profit motivation. Furthermore, the items and service price were not designed in accordance the demand for physical examination and affordability. These are referred as lacking of restrict scientific evidence, of non considering of maximally detecting disease and positive rate, and of various service items to meet the different demand categorized by gender, income, and epidemiological pattern. Therefore, the selective suggestions be made, in accordance with WHO recommended physical examination items, to maximize the benefit of physical examination service providers and demander for the services. A combination theory from epidemiology, clinical medicine, and health economics, able to design various service package to meet different demand. The objective of the study is to design two physical examination item packages, by targeting the particular population, basing on the database obtained from urban employee physical examination results at a specialized hospital in Shandong province.
     The first package is to design a particularly required physical examination items in line with ICD-10. It is based on disease category, the probability distribution of the positive rate, and disease pattern of anthroponomy. In addition, it ensures the package in line with the disease category.
     The second is to design a basic physical examination item in line with ICD-10. The physical examination package, designed by income level and age, is based on disease category, the probability distribution of the positive rate, and the cluster analysis. It is stratified in accordance with disease category and positive rate identified. Firstly, the sample is categorized into both male and female sub-sample by gender. Secondly, the cluster analysis is undertaken in each male and female sub-sample. Finally, the disease category and positive rate are treated as the cluster factors to cluster the physical examination package among different age groups.
     The objective of designing the Physical examination packages are as follows; a) It should meet the need of an individual's choice in accordance with her/his gender, age, health status, economic condition. This may lead to reduce the asymmetric information and then to increase the transparency of choosing appropriate "combination of physical examination items" for each individual. Therefore, it may more or less reduce the phenomena of supply-induced demand. In general, it could save the limited resource and reduce the financial burden for individual; b) The purpose of designing the stratified Physical examination packages are to well understand the common base disease for both male and female, age-specified mobility, and so on. In other words, it is useful for researchers to analyze the chronic disease management and its effective interventions, epidemiological survey, and molecule genetics; c) The importance of designing reasonable physical examination package is to guide the collection of individuals' health information, risk evolution and forecast, health maintenance, and health promotion; d) It is also a value-added method to enrich and develop the theoretical research of physical examination industry. In conclusion, the general objective of the study is to criterion the physical examination market, improve the quality of physical examination service and its efficiency, ensure the reliable and testable results, improve the equity and transparency of the price of physical examination service. It is expected that the results obtained from the study could be recommended to policy makers for making appropriate policy and documents.
     Results:
     1、The specified physical examination package by the disease pattern of anthroponomy
     It is designed by ICD-10. Nine specified physical examination packages, including Respiratory System、Circulatory System、Alimentary System (Liver、Gallbladder、Pancreas、spleen service package and stomach、intestine service package)、urinary system、hematological system、Endocrine and metabolic system、nervous and skeletal system、gynecologic and anthology exam service package, are designed in accordance with disease category, the probability distribution of positive rate, and the disease pattern of anthroponomy. The price of medical examination projects is in strict accordance with the standards of uniform pricing regulated by Shandong bureau of price.
     2、The basic physical examination package in terms of gender, age, and disease pattern
     It is designed in accordance with ICD-10. Ten basic physical examination packages are designed, stratified by gender and age group, basing on disease category, probability distribution of positive rate, and the cluster analysis.
     a) Four packages are designed with specification for male. They are 40 years old below, 40-49 age group, 50-59 age group, and 60 years old and above respectively.
     b) Six packages are designed for female including 30 years old below, 30-39, 40-49,50-54,55-64, and 65 years old and above age group respectively.
     In terms of age group in each physical examination package, it is ranked as A, B, and C according to the probability of disease category and positive rate identified in the target population. Hence, Package A represents the basic physical examination package. The combination of choosing package A, B, and C are decided by the needs for physical examination or each individual financial affordability. However, the repeated items in the package are not double charged if they are overlapped among different packages.
     Conclusions:
     1. Nine specified physical examination packages are designed, in accordance with ICD-10, to satisfy the various demand for physical examination. The packages are scientifically designed basing on disease category, the probability distribution ofpositive rate identified, and the disease pattern of anthroponomy.
     2. Basing on disease category, the probability distribution of the positive rate identified, and systematic cluster analysis, the packages are designed in line with ICD-10. In addition, it is further stratified in terms of gender and age group to increase the flexible operation.
     3. The applicability and penalization of the urban residents' physical examination packages are reasonable. It not only gives attention to the benefit of the providers, but represents the benefit of demand side for the physical examination services.
     4. It provides a theoretical method and idea for each target population of the physical examination items through studying the urban residents' physical examination packages.
     Recommendations:
     1. The health authorities should pay attention to the research of physical examination. Basing on the research results, it could rationally regulate the physical examination market.
     2. The physical examination service providers should evaluate and summary the effectiveness of using the different packages. This is required the providers choosing appropriate packages in terms of effectiveness, cost and efficiency of the physical examination service. Thus, the quality of service could be improved.
     3. The service provider should pay attention to collect information of each physical examination. This further helps to trim and analysis the results.
     4. In addition, to criterion the Physical examination packages, it is required the emphasis of educating the importance of Physical examination, the increasing financial inputs from the government, the improvement of utilization rate of the Physical examination services. Then, these measures could exert the objective of servicing the general population for the service providers.
     5. The further study should pay attention to evaluate the benefit of each physical examination package and undertake the willingness to pay analysis.
引文
1.World Bank(1993)World Development Report,Investing in Health[D].New York:Oxford University Press,1994
    2.谢士威,米光明.美国健康教育历史沿革[J].中国健康教育,1998,14(4):30-32
    3.张成琪,孟庆跃,冯建利等.健康体检发展与健康管理的模式探讨[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,23(8):510-513
    4.曹志友,任旷,王华林等.关于亚健康的几点认识[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2003,21(5):388-390
    5.梁卫华.浅谈健康体检机构的产生与发展[J].Chinese Journal of Current Hospital Adminatrantion,2006,4(4):89-90
    6.新华社.世界著名健康体检机构介绍,2004.09http://www.pharmnet.com.cn/health/2004/09/24/137102.html
    7.Chii-Jun Chion,M.S.and Hsing-Yi Chang,Dr.PH.Do the elderly benefit from Annual Physical Examination?[J].Preventive Medicine,2002(35):264-270
    8.Nakannshi N,Tatara,Takashima Y,Fujiwara H,Takamori Y,Takabayashi H,et al.The association of health management with the health of elderly people[J].Age Ageing,1995(24):334-340
    9.Nakannshi N,Tatara K,Tatatorige,Murakami S,Shinsho EEffeets of preventive health service on survival of the elderly living in a community in Osaka,Japan[J].Epidemiol Commun Health,1997(51):199-204
    10.Vetter N.J,Jones DA,Victor CR.Effects of health vistors working with elderly patients in general practice;a randomized controlled trial[J].Br Med J,1984(289):1522-1524
    11.Nakannshi N,Tatara K,Fujiwara H.Do preventive health services reduce eventual demand for medical care?[J].Soc Sci Med,1996(43):999-1005
    12.李育才.健康产业发展六大趋势[J].中国卫生产业,2005(9):65-66
    13.孙乃强.健康体检的前世今生[J].中国卫生产业,2005(9):44-45
    14.蔡志明.从以病人为中心到以人为中心[J].医院管理,2003(2):34-37
    15.陈英耀,吕军,Stuart O.Schweitier.控制卫生费用还是投资于健康-兼论健康产业模式[J].中国医院管理,2003,23(4):1-3
    16.Hyner GC,Peterson KW,Twavis JW,et al.SPM handbook of health assessment tools[M].2~(nd)ed.Pittsburgh,PA:The Society of Prosective Medicine,1999
    17.Ann S.Me Alearney SCD.Population health management:strategies for health improvement[M].Chicago:Health Administration Press,2002
    18.S.Iliffe,K.Kharicha,D.Harari et al.Health risk appraisal for older people in general practice using an expert system:a pilot study[J]Health and Social Care in the Community,2005,13(1):21-29
    19.Meizi He,Charlene Beynon.Prevalence of Overweight and esity In School-aged Children.Dietetic Practice and Research,2006,67(3):125
    20.李秋娟,杨光,孙鲜策等.健康风险评估与控制在预防医学中教学中的应用[J].大连医科大学学报,2006,28(3):270-271
    21.田京利,刘福勇,仲伟红等.中老年健康体检综合评估方法的研究[J].解放军保健医学杂志,2002,4(4):228-229
    22.柴传英,陈宝海,丁玲.健康体检面临的问题及对策[J].实用医药杂志,2006,23(8):10-17
    23.王丽萍,沈碧云,聂冬莉.健康体检现代管理模式的探讨[J].中国热带医学,2006,6(8):1521-1522
    24.徐贻萍,朱宝立.模糊数学法进行健康监护综合评价的探讨[J].中国工业医学杂志,2001,14(3):183-185
    25.刘秀颖,韦再华,雷海潮,等.北京市糖尿病等17种疾病的疾病负担研究.中国卫生经济.2005,12(24):14-16
    26.贾瑞珍,杜兵.健康体检的深层价值探讨(附1300例体检结果分析).中国全科医学,2007,10(1):58-59
    27.蔡於才.256例健康体检者的健康知识、行为及影响因素调查.中国健康教育,2003,19(4):274-276
    28.孙雪萍,唐新红.1999~2004年金山区幼儿园儿童体检结果分析.中国儿童保健杂志,2005,13(2):182
    29.石学峰,张成琪,宋心红.2003年济南是城区部分健康体检人群患病情况分析.预防医学论坛,2006,12(1):19-21
    30.袁红,毛精华,饶定虎,等.我院实施健康体检套餐的做法[J].中国医院管理杂志,2003,19(11):700
    31.王方刃,叶晶晶,林可颐.福建市健康体检中心服务现状研究[J].中国卫生资 源,2007,10(2):64-65
    32.茆振华.上海市民健康体检的现况调查[J].海南医药,2005,16(8):174-175
    33.李英年,李晓华,王桂玲.浅述健康体检的管理[J].医学研究生报,2006,19(1):95-96
    34.项扬,路薇.社会主义初级阶段的卫生国情[M].上海:学林出版社,1994.117-132
    35.谭嘉.医改应重点加强公卫建设.健康报,2007,7937:1
    36.孔令敏.城镇居民医保将惠及2.4亿人.健康报,2007,7936:1
    37.陈灏珠,李宗明.内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997
    38.曾强.医院体检中心的发展趋势与展望[J].中华健康管理杂志,2007,1(1)22-23
    39.王陇德.中国居民营养与健康状况调查报告之一2002综合报告[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:46-48
    40.赵威丽,徐军明.健康查体人员年龄与查体费用、查体时间相关因素调查[J].解放军护理杂志,2004,21(8)24-25
    41.张成琪,孟庆跃,唐芳等.健康体检费用来源分析.中国卫生经济,2008,3
    42.徐军明,赵威丽.健康查体人员自身因素与查体意识、查体费用关系的调查分析.解放军护理杂志,2004,21(9)23-25
    1.段燕霞.体检人员对医院健康教育工作的反馈与需求调查[J].中国健康教育杂志,1999,15(6):59-61
    2.World Bank(1993)World Development Report,Investing in Health[D].New York:Oxford University Press,1994
    3.谢士威,米光明.美国健康教育历史沿革[J].中国健康教育,1998,14(4):30-32
    4.谢展飞.影响健康的四大因素.2005.11http://i.mop.com/donotfoolme/blog/2005/11/25/975862.html
    5.陈君石,黄建始.健康管理概论.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2006:35-80
    6.李宝元.人力资本与经济发展[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000:77
    7.中国食品商务网.2006中国家庭健康投资计划,2005,12http://www.21food.cn/html/news/9/60408.htm
    8.家庭医生报.健康是最有价值的投资,2005.03http://www.jtysb.com.cn/search_text.asp?id=2986
    9.项扬,路薇.社会主义初级阶段的卫生国情[M].上海:学林出版社,1994,117-132
    10.新华社.世界著名健康体检机构介绍,2004.09http://www.pharmnet.com.cn/health/2004/09/24/137102.html
    11.Chii-Jun Chion,M.S.Hsing-Yi Chang,Dr.PH.Do the elderly benefit from Annual Physical Examination?[J].Preventive Medicine,2002(35):264-270
    12.Nakannshi N,Tatara,Takashima Y,et al.The association of health management with the health of elderly people[J].Age Ageing,1995(24):334-340
    13.Nakannshi N,Tatara K,Tatatorige,et al.Effects of preventive health service on survival of the elderly living in a community in Osaka,Japan[J].Epidemiol Commun Health,1997(51):199-204
    14.Vetter NJ,Jones DA,Victor CR.Effects of health vistors working with elderly patients in general practice;a randomized controlled trial[J].Br Med J,1984(289):1522-1524
    15.张成琪,孟庆跃,冯建利等.健康体检发展与健康管理的模式探讨[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,23(8):510-513
    16.Schneck P.On the history of dietetics from antiquity to our time.Ukrainian Historical And Medical Journal,2002:9-10
    17.Mcaleamey AS.Population health management:strategies for health improvement.Chicago:Health Administration Press.2003
    18.黄建始.美国的健康管理:源自无法遏制的医疗费用增长.中华医学杂志,2006,86:1011-1013
    19.陈君石,黄建始.健康管理师[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2007
    20.Research Committee,Occupational and Environmental Health Foundation.Establishing a research agenda in health and productivity.J Occup Environ Med,2004,46:518-520
    21.Nakannshi N,Tatara K,Fujiwara H.Do preventive health services reduce eventual demand for medical carc?[J].Soc Sci Mcd,1996(43):999-1005
    22.李育才.健康产业发展六大趋势[J].中国卫生产业,2005(9):65-66
    23.中国卫生部心血管病防治中心.中国心血管病报告2005.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2006
    24.曾利明.中国目前有七成人口处于亚健康状态,2002.05http://www.people.com.cn/GB/shenghuo/20020510/725153.html
    25.健康管理分会.健康管理在体检服务中的应用,2007.10http://www.51kang.com/new/20071030130708/index.shtml
    26.郑嘉羽,刘宇静,黄志聪.筹建体检中心需注意的有关事项[J].科学管理,2006,21(4):31-36
    27.王惠军,王炳丽.SARS过后新掘金产业借势萌芽-健康体检产业发展展望[J].医药世界,2003(9):14-23
    28.苏志,宋文质.日本的职业管理及国家的扶助政策[J].中国工业医学杂志,1995(3):190-191
    29.曾强.医院体检中心的发展趋势与展望[J].中华健康管理杂志,2007,1(1)22-23
    30.王桂茹,刘群,于水.自费体检比例偏低的原因分析[J].现代预防医学,2006,33(3):454-455
    31.大众网-生活日报.体检详细导航,2007,07http://www.dzwww.com
    32.孔令敏.城镇居民医保将惠及2.4亿人.健康报,2007,7936:1
    33.谭嘉.医改应重点加强公卫建设.健康报,2007,7937:1
    34.李再强;林枫.医疗保险制度下的慢性病健康管理模式[J].中国卫生经济2005,24(1):45-46
    35.许志伟.我国健康管理与健康保险结合的意义[J].中华医学信息导报,2006,21(12):6
    36.孙乃强.健康体检的前世今生[J].中国卫生产业,2005(9):44-45
    37.Yasushi Kudo,Toshihiko Satoh,Kaori Hosoi,et al.Factors associated with satisfaction among participants in a periodical health check-up at a workplace in Japan[J].International Congress series,2006(1294):201-204
    38.蔡志明.从以病人为中心到以人为中心[J].医院管理,2003(2):34-37
    39.陈英耀,吕军,Stuart O.Schweitier控制卫生费用还是投资于健康—兼论健康产业模式[J].中国医院管理,2003,23(4):1-3
    40.Hyner GC,Peterson KW,Twavis JW,et al.SPM handbook of health assessment tools[M].2~(nd)ed.Pittsburgh,PA:The Society of Prosective Medicine,1999
    41.Ann S.Me Aleamey SCD.Population health management:strategies for health improvement[M].Chicago:Health Administration Press,2002
    42.S Iliffe,K Kharicha,D Harari,et al.Health risk appraisal for older people in general practice using an expert system:a pilot study[J].Health and Social Care in the Community,2005,13(1):21-29.
    43.Meizi He,Charlene Beynon.Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity In School-aged children.Dietetic Practice and Research,2006,67(3):125
    44.袁红,毛精华,饶定虎,等.我院实施健康体检套餐的做法[J].中国医院管理杂志,2003,19(11):700
    45.王方刃,叶晶晶,林可颐.福建市健康体检中心服务现状研究[J].中国卫生资源,2007,10(2):64-65
    46.茆振华.上海市民健康体检的现况调查[J].海南医药,2005,16(8):174-175
    47.李英年,李晓华,王桂玲.浅述健康体检的管理[J].医学研究生报,2006,19(1):95-96
    48.李秋娟,杨光,孙鲜策,等.健康风险评估与控制在预防医学中教学中的应用[J].大连医科大学学报,2006,28(3):270-271
    49.田京利,刘福勇,仲伟红,等.中老年健康体检综合评估方法的研究[J].解放军保健医学杂志,2002,4(4):228-229
    50.柴传英,陈宝海,丁玲.健康体检面临的问题及对策[J].实用医药杂志,2006,23(8):1017
    51.王丽萍,沈碧云,聂冬莉.健康体检现代管理模式的探讨[J].中国热带医学,2006,6(8):1521-1522
    52.徐贻萍,朱宝立.模糊数学法进行健康监护综合评价的探讨[J].中国工业医学杂志,2001,14(3):183-185

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700