低碳经济视角下新能源CDM项目的国际合作问题研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
“低碳经济”是世界经济发展面对的共同课题。它是以“低能耗、低污染、低排放”为基础的经济模式,其实质是通过降低能耗和减少污染物排放,建立合理的能源结构,从而达到社会经济发展与生态环境保护双赢的一种经济发展形态。低碳经济既是能源“低碳化”的理论基础,又是可持续发展的主要体现,同时还是新能源发展的动力所在。
     为应对全球气候变化,全球应对气候变化的国际制度框架《联合国气候变化框架公约(UNFCCC)》和《京都议定书》分别签订,提出“到2050年要将大气中二氧化碳浓度控制在工业化之前水平的2倍以内”;《京都议定书》确立了联合履约机制(JI)、清洁发展机制(CDM)和排放交易机制(ET)三种国际合作机制,其中CDM是唯一涉及发展中国家的“灵活机制”,是实现低碳经济和能源可持续发展的重要经济手段。CDM能够促使发达国家通过提供“资金和技术”的方式与发展中国家开展项目合作,同时将项目实现的核证减排量(CERs)用于履行其在《议定书》中的承诺,是发展中国家与发达国家合作共赢的一种机制。通过CDM,可以实现全球降低温室气体减排成本的效果,促进各国低碳经济的实现。
     我国CDM市场潜力巨大,从数量和对碳排放的贡献上看,新能源CDM项目占主导地位。当前,以“高碳”为主要特征的能源结构严重制约我国低碳经济的实现,而CDM的实施则有助于我国吸收额外的资金、促进技术转让,促进新能源产业发展。所以,我们应充分利用好CDM等相关国际经济合作手段,大力发展新能源,调整能源结构,保证能源可持续发展。
     从国内外研究分析,我们不难发现目前学者对新能源CDM项目的研究,大多数缺乏成体系的综合性分析,定量研究少而浅。另外从低碳经济视角出发,对新能源CDM项目的碳排放方法学原理、国际合作技术转让机理以及风险评估模型的构建及实证展开研究的也较少。
     因此,综合上述分析,本文在调查研究、整理资料的基础上,以低碳经济理论、产业发展理论、可持续发展理论、市场外部性理论、比较优势理论等为依据,基于低碳经济视角,针对CDM运行机理及其对新能源发展影响展开分析:
     首先,从碳交易概念和产生背景出发,分析了CDM、JI、ET等三大碳交易机制各自发展状况、理论特点;分析了我国参与碳交易的必要性:中国只有构建全球性的碳市场,才能在整个碳交易产业链上掌握主动权,从而规避CDM项目的风险;分析了CDM内涵和特点和CDM的双赢性:它一方面可促进发展中国家可持续发展,获得“技术和资金”,另一方面它可协助发达国家实现温室气体减排承诺;最后分析了CDM范围、相关机构职责和项目开发流程,为后续开展CDM项目研究提供理论支持。
     其次,分析了CDM对能源可持续发展和对低碳经济发展作用。研究了制约我国能源发展的障碍:如“高碳”能源结构不合理、能源效率低下、严重的能源环境与能源安全问题;探讨了我国新能源对改善能源结构、促进节能减排作用,CDM对新能源的发展有较强的相关性,CDM有利于新能源的技术转移和融资,是发展新能源、促进低碳经济实现的重要经济手段;最后提出有效推进我国新能源发展的建议。
     再者,分析了我国新能源CDM项目发展现状和潜力。通过国内外CDM项目现状的对比分析,指出我国CDM项目的数量和对碳排放的贡献在国际上都处主导地位。接着以水电、风电以及生物质发电的CDM项目为代表,分析了我国新能源CDM项目的市场现状、减排贡献及发展潜力;本节最后运用SWOT分析法,深入研究了新能源CDM项目的优势、劣势、机遇、威胁,指出我国开发新能源CDM项目存在的主要问题,并提出相应对策。
     最后,基于上述分析,着重分析了以下三个新能源CDM项目在国际合作开发中的关键问题:
     1、国际合作开发中新能源CDM项目的碳排放核证方法原理及应用研究
     针对CDM方法学和额外性判定问题,分析了碳排放基准线选择、额外性判定和考量、方法学的确定等,着重分析了新能源常用的方法学类型。最后以山西某水电CDM项目为例,运用统一基准线方法学对该项目的碳减排量进行了定量计算,为新能源CDM项目的方法学选择和核证过程提供参考。
     2、对新能源领域CDM项目的国际技术转让机理及实证研究
     首先,分析了技术转让内涵、国际技术转让和CDM项目国际技术转让问题;接着,从CDM项目技术转让类型、模式、流程三个角度详细介绍了CDM技术转让的机理;最后,着重研究了促进国际新能源CDM项目技术转让的模型——博弈谈判模型和讨价还价模型,并以吉林某生物质发电CDM项目和内蒙某风电CDM项目为例,论证了技术转让博弈模型在CDM国际合作技术转让谈判的作用,以及技术转让讨价还价模型在CDM国际合作技术转让中的适用性。
     3、对新能源CDM项目的风险预测与评价模型构建的研究并实证分析
     依据CDM项目开发流程中不同阶段可能遇到的问题,将CDM项目的风险总结归纳为注册风险、项目建设和运营风险等七种风险,在此基础上,利用蒙特卡洛模型和模糊综合评价方法,建立了新能源CDM项目风险预测和评价模型;并以某成功注册的小水电CDM项目为例,对新能源CDM项目的风险进行实例分析;最后针对新能源领域CDM项目存在的问题提出相应对策。以上模型构建和实证分析为规避新能源CDM项目开发过程中的风险提供了科学依据。
     通过以上分析,本文得出以下结论:(1)我国发展新能源具有很大必要性,而CDM对促进我国新能源发展具有积极作用。(2)新能源CDM项目具有节能减排效益,但也存在开发问题。(3)从基准线方法学角度分析了新能源的常用的碳减排方法原理并加以实证。(4)新能源CDM项目可促进技术转让,尤其是促进先进的环境友好型技术的转让。(5)新能源CDM项目在具体实施过程中存在风险,但可进行跟踪评价。
     上述研究成果解决了我国新能源CDM项目在国际合作开发中的主要问题,可借鉴到整个CDM系统中,使得对新能源CDM项目开发的研究更系统化,更具可操作性、可行性和实践性。本文创新点在于:
     (1)以可持续发展理论为指导,从低碳经济视角对新能源发展、国际CDM项目合作运作机理等问题进行了全面深入的系统研究,构建了研究的整体框架和路线。
     (2)以CDM对新能源发展的促进作用为切入点,深入探讨了CDM对新能源发展的促进作用、影响机理和风险评价方法。
     (3)深入探讨了基于国际通行规则和统一基准线方法学ACM0002定量分析新能源CDM项目对减排贡献的数理模型,并成功地将该模型应用于陕西某水电项目减排量的测算。
     (4)构建了新能源CDM国际技术转让项目的博弈模型和讨价还价模型,并以吉林某生物质发电CDM项目和内蒙某风电CDM项目为例进行实证分析,。
     (5)构建了新能源CDM项目风险分析和预测的蒙特卡洛模型,并以四川某水电站CDM项目为例对新能源CDM项目的风险进行实例分析,为规避CDM项目的开发风险提供了科学依据。
The "low- carbon economy" is a common topic in world economy development, it is based on the following characteristics :"low energy consumption, low pollution, low emission”,its essence is to build a reasonable energy structure through reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions, and so as to achieve a " win-win " economy development pattern about the social economic development and ecological environment protection. Low-carbon economy is not only the theoretical basis of energy low-carbonization, but also the reflection of sustainable development, and it is also the main motive of new energy the development.
     In response to the global climate change,“Kyoto Protocol " established three international cooperation mechanisms: the joint implement mechanism (JI), the clean development mechanism (CDM) and the emissions trading mechanism (ET), CDM is the only "flexible mechanisms" used in developing country, It is the important economic methods to achieve the low carbon economy and energy sustainable development. CDM is a win-win mechanism between the developing countries and the developed countries. Through the CDM project cooperation, the developed countries can fulfill its promise of carbon emissions reductions execution in the KP, by the way of providing "capital and technology" to the developing countries. Through the CDM, we can reduce the overall economic costs of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions also, then, it can promote the realization of global low carbon economy.
     Chinese CDM market has a tremendous potential. From the view of CDM quantity and contribution to carbon emissions, the new energy CDM projects play a dominant role in China. At present, our "high carbon" energy structure hinder our low carbon economy realization, and the CDM implementation is helpful to absorb the additional funds and to promote technology transfer, then promoting our new energy industry development. So we should make full use of CDM and other related means, rapid new energy development, adjust the energy structure, which can guarantee the sustainable development of energy In term of the home and abroad scholars’current research about new energy CDM, we can find that great majority research lack comprehensiveness, and the quantitative study is also shallow too; In addition, the following mechanism and empirical research is less too, which include carbon emissions methodology and its applying, new energy CDM projects technology transfer mechanism and risk evaluation models etc.. Therefore, according to the investigation and sorting of relative materials, based on low carbon economy perspective, according to low carbon economy theory, industrial development theory, sustainable development theory, market externality theory, the theory of comparative advantage etc., the paper start the analysis about CDM operation mechanism and development and affect on new energy.
     First, based on the carbon trading concept and background, analyzed the respective development status and their theoretical characteristics of three carbon trading mechanism CDM, JI and ET; Analyses the necessity of our participation in the carbon trading: only by the means of constructing the global carbon market,China can have the initiative in hands in entire carbon trading industry chain ,thus avoiding the CDM risk;Analyzed CDM’s connotation and its win-win characteristic: on one hand it can promote the sustainable development in developing countries, get "technology and capital", on the other hand it can help the developed countries achieve greenhouse gas emissions commitments; At last, analyzed the CDM scope, the relevant agency responsibilities and project development processes. The theoretical support will be provided for subsequent CDM project research
     Secondly, this paper started the impact analysis of CDM on Chinese energy sustainable development and low carbon economy. First studied the obstacle restricting our energy development such as unreasonable "high carbon" energy structure, low energy efficiency and serious energy environment and security problem; Analyzed new energy contribution to energy structure improving, the carbon abatement, find out the obstacles to the new energy development; CDM is helpful for new energy technology transfer and financing; it has strong positive correlation to new energy development too ,and it is the important economic means for the development of new energy and our low carbon economy. At last the paper puts forward new energy development Suggestions.
     Furthermore, the paper analyzed the status of new energy CDM projects and their development potential. Through the home and abroad comparison and analysis about CDM project status, we can get that China CDM project play great role in the world whatever quantity or carbon emissions contribution. Then, with hydropower, wind power and biomass power generation as new energy representation, the paper analyzed the situation of new energy CDM projects market and their development potential, contribution to carbon reduction; at last, the paper utilized SWOT, studied their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats of CDM project, found the main existing questions, and pointed out corresponding countermeasures about new energy developing.
     Finally, based on the above analysis, this paper analyzed the following three key questions about new energy in international CDM project development cooperation:
     1) The research on the nature of verification method principle for the carbon emission reduction and its application in international cooperation renewable energy CDM projects. The approach for CDM methodology research and additionality determination is taken with regards to applicability of methodology, analysis of baseline scenario, and assessment of additionality, especially concerning about those methodologies applied popularly for renewable projects. In such case a Shanxi hydropower project is considered as a reference example for methodology determination and validation procedures exposure, in which the carbon emission reduction has been accurately calculated as per an available combined methodology in valid version and the relevant tools.
     2) The mechanism and empirical research of international technology transfer in CDM renewable energy field Firstly, the nature of technology transfer, the mechanism of international technology transfer, and technology transfer for CDM projects are analyzed; Secondly, the technology transfer in CDM is illuminated in different aspects including genres, modeling, and procedures; Finally, the game-negotiation modeling and bargaining modeling are both discussed particularly as in the process to accelerate the international technology transfer in CDM renewable energy project. The valid usage of the former modeling in negotiation and the availability of the latter modeling in international technology transfer are demonstrated by two CDM projects analysis regarding with a Jilin biomass power generation project and an Inner Mongolia wind farm project.
     3)the research on constructing risk forecast and evaluation modeling in renewable CDM projects and empirical research analysis
     According to the possible problems coming from different stages in CDM projects developing flows, the different risks during the whole process are summarized as seven types, such as registration risk, project construction risk, operation risk, and so on. The renewable energy CDM project risk forecast and evaluation modeling is established based on these risks analysis by Monte Carlo model and the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. A successfully registered small scale hydropower plant is exemplified for the risk evaluation and the possible tragedies to avoid risks are also supplied for renewable CDM projects. The modeling above and empirical research afford the scientific applicability criteria for avoiding risks in this field.
     As above all,the conclusion can be got as following:
     1) our country has the great necessity to promote new energy development ,and CDM has played an active role in new energy development too. 2) CDM projects of new energy has great efficiency for energy conservation and emission reduction, but it had also trouble in development problems. 3)the priciple of the carbon emission reduction was analyzed ,based on the baseline methodology of new energy and and empirical demonstration research was done too. 4) new energy CDM project can promote technology transfer, especially promote advanced environmentally friendly technology transfer. 5) the risk of new energy CDM projects exists in their implementation process, but it can be tracked on and be evaluated. The above research has solved the main problems existing in new energy CDM project development process, it can be also applied to the entire CDM system ,which will ensure the new energy research of CDM project development more systematic, more maneuverability, feasibility and practicality. The innovation points of the paper is as following:
     (1) keep the concept of sustainable development as instruction, on the view of the low carbon economy perspective, deeply and comprehensively research the new energy development, and the international CDM project operation mechanism etc. ,constructs the research framework and routes.
     (2) for new energy development in the CDM promoting effect as the breakthrough point, probes into the development of new energy to CDM project, the influence mechanism and promotes the risk evaluation method.
     (3) based on the international prevailing rules and unified baseline methodology of new energy ACM0002 , research the mathematical model of the CDM project emission contribution, and applied successfully to a hydropower project in shanxi reductions measuring.
     (4) build the game model and bargaining model for new energy CDM international technology transfer projects, and put them applying and had the empirical analysis in CDM project of Jilin biomass power generation and Inner Mongolia wind power CDM project
     (5) The renewable energy CDM project risk forecast and evaluation modeling is established by Monte Carlo model and the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. A successfully registered small scale hydropower plant is exemplified for the risk evaluation, it also offers the scientific basis for avoiding the risk of CDM project development.
引文
1何勇,张春艳,方浩.碳交易与低碳经济[J].浙江经济,2010.
    2陈鹏飞.国际碳交易市场运行机制分析[J].商场现代化,2010(7):5-5.
    1何勇,张春艳,方浩.碳交易与低碳经济[J].浙江经济,2010.
    1王革华等.能源与可持续发展[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
    
    1叶韵.基于外部性理论的城市规划研究[D].北京交通大学硕士毕业论文,2006.
    2贾丽虹.外部性理论及其政策边界[D].华大师范大学博士学位论文,2003.
    1清华大学.清洁发展机制[M].北京:社会科学出版社,2004.
    2清华大学.清洁发展机制[M].北京:社会科学出版社,2004.
    3中美财经资讯网
    1清华大学全球环境研究中心.我国清洁发展机制项目开发与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    2清华大学.清洁发展机制[M].北京:社会科学出版社,2004.
    3清华大学全球环境研究中心.我国清洁发展机制项目开发与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    1清华大学全球环境研究中心.我国清洁发展机制项目开发与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    2清华大学全球环境研究中心.我国清洁发展机制项目开发与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    1清华大学.清洁发展机制[M].北京:社会科学出版社,2004.
    1庄贵阳:《我国发展低碳经济的困难与障碍分析》,《江西社会科学》2009年第7期。
    
    1国家农业部.农业生物质能产业发展规划(2007-2015)[R].北京:国家农业部,2007.
    2田宜水,孟海波.农作物秸秆开发利用技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007.
    
    1《洁发展机制项目开发百问百答》马燕合.郭日生.科学出版社2009。
    2我国21实际议程管理中心.清洁发展机制方法学指南[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005:9-10
    1段茂盛,周胜.清洁发展机制方法学应用指南.北京:我国环境科学出版社,2010:21-30
    1段茂盛,周胜.清洁发展机制方法学应用指南.北京:我国环境科学出版社,2010:39-51
    [1]牛文元.关于推行低碳经济促进科学发展的若干思考[J].广西节能,2009,(3)
    [2]庄贵阳.中国发展低碳经济的困难与障碍分析[J].江西社会科学,2009,(7)
    [3]何建坤.发展低碳经济,关键在于低碳技术创新[J].绿叶,2009(1)
    [4]付允.低碳经济的发展模式研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2008(3)
    [5]贾晶晶.基于CDM的低碳技术转让[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文,2010.6
    [6]冯之浚.科技进步与低碳经济[J].中国经济周刊,2009,(40)
    [7]清华大学全球环境研究中心.我国清洁发展机制项目开发与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    [8]周剑玮.低碳经济下的CDM发展研究[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [9]姜克隽,胡秀莲.我国与全球温室气体排放情景分析模型(IPAC-Emission)[J].能源研究所.
    [10]何勇,张春艳.碳交易与低碳经济[J].浙江经济,2010(6)
    [11]高广生.清洁发展机制(CDM)的实施与管理[J].中国能源,2003(6)
    [12]刘振英,王燕.CDM给新能源开发带来的商机[J].我国科技投资,2006.
    [13]蒋小翼.2012年后CDM走势及其对中国的影响[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(3)
    [14]郭燕青.技术转移与区域经济发展[M].经济管理出版社,2004.
    [15]郑照宁,潘韬,刘德顺.用清洁发展机制促进先进能源技术转让[J].节能与环保,2003(6):16-20.
    [16]何军飞.风力发电清洁发展机制项目案例分析[J].中国电力,2006(9)
    [17]王敬东.利用清洁发展机制促进可持续发展[J].资源开发与市场,2007(10)
    [18]郑思海.CDM国际合作中的技术交流障碍与对策研究[J].特区经济,2010(2)
    [19]陈文颖.国际合作碳减排机制模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005(6)
    [20]刘纪显.CDM对我国新能源产业的影响[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(5)
    [21]林伯强.电力消费与中国经济增长:基于生产函数的研究[J].管理世界,2003(11)
    [22]王革华等.能源与可持续发展[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
    [23]陈坤.清洁发展机制项目可持续发展能力评价体系研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文,2008.
    [24]郭燕青.技术转移与区域经济发展[M].经济管理出版社,2004.
    [25]丁治平.京都议定书下温室气体减排机制研究[D].硕士论文,2008.
    [26]陈文颖.用MARKAL-MACRO模型研究碳减排对中国能源系统的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004(3)
    [27]范中启.能源—经济—环境系统可持续发展协调状态的测度与评价[J].预测,2006(4)
    [28]张希良,何建坤,常世彦,等.我国替代能源战略宏观情景研究[R].北京:清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院, 2007.
    [29]戚婷婷.清洁发展机制(CDM)项目风险评价的实证研究.我国科学技术大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [30]孙丽英.CDM背景下的新能源开发[J].新能源产业,2007(3):52-55.
    [31]崔和瑞.基于VAR模型的我国能源-经济-环境(3E)系统研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2010(1)
    [32]陈晓英.基于公共产品理论的机关后勤服务社会化研究[D].上海交通大学工商管理(MBA)硕士学位论文,2008.
    [33]清华大学全球环境研究中心.我国清洁发展机制项目开发与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    [34]魏楚.能源效率及其影响因素:基于DEA的实证分析[J].管理世界,2007(8)
    [35] Zhaoguang Hu, Quan Wen, Jianhui Wang, Xiandong Tan, Hameed Nezhad, Baoguo Shan, Xinyang Han. Integrated resource strategic planning in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2010(38):4635-4642.
    [36]魏楚.能源效率与能源生产率:基于DEA方法的省际数据比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007(7)
    [37]刘洪.我国资源节约型社会综合评价指标体系的构建及实证[J].统计与决策,2010(8)
    [38] Zhang Zhongxiang. China,the United States and technology cooperation on climate control[J].Environmental Seience&Poliey,2007(1).
    [39] Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Frame work Conventionon Climate Change (UNFCCC)[R]. UNFCCC. FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1. Bonn.1997.
    [40] United Nations Frame work Conventionon Climate Change[R]. Switzerland: IUCC,1992.
    [41]侯国卿.内蒙古风力发电现状及前景[J].电力勘测设计,2004(3)
    [42]姒勇芳.可再生能源在浙西农村生态住宅的应用[J].制冷技术.2010,(4)
    [43]王玉刚.发展低碳绿色能源打造太阳能产业强省[J].科学与管理,2010(4)
    [44]景侠.黑龙江省能源资源可持续发展研究[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2010(11)
    [45]裴郁.我国可再生能源发展战略研究[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004(2)
    [46]李俊峰.可再生能源发展状况与立法[J].中国建设动态(阳光能源),2005(2)
    [47]周凤起.中国可再生能源发展战略[J].上海电力,2005(6)
    [48]鲁峰.新能源产业可持续发展的战略思考[J].宏观经济管理,2009(11)
    [49]汤倩.中国新能源发展战略研究[J].现代商贸工业,2010(17)
    [50]袁男优.低碳经济的概念内涵[J].城市环境与城市生态,2010(1)
    [51]周璐.低碳经济:内涵、发展必然性与可行途径[J].现代商贸工业,2010(5)
    [52]范建华.低碳经济的理论内涵及体系构建研究[J].当代经济,2010(3)
    [53]陈柳钦.低碳经济发展的金融支持研究[J].金融发展研究,2010(7)
    [54]吴艳梅.关于谷威公司价格谈判策略的探讨[D].对外经济贸易大学工商管理硕士(MBA)学位论文,2006.
    [55]王海芹,邹骥.关于技术转让与发展中国家温室气体控排的研究[J].气候变化,2009(1):74-77.
    [56] Deal C.Climate Change Technology Transfer: Opportunities in the Developing World[R].USA:Iowa State University,2007.
    [57]李春银.国际技术转让的政府管理问题研究[D].广东外语外贸大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [58]李建华,张国琪.国际技术转让价格的讨价还价模型研究[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(1):28-32.
    [59]张国琪.国际技术转让价格讨价还价模型研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [60]陈鹏飞.国际碳交易市场运行机制分析[J].商场现代化,2010(7):5-5.
    [61] IEA(International Energy Agency).30key energy trends in the IEA&worldwide [C]. 30th Anniversayr of the International Energy Agency,2005.
    [62]王仲瑀.黑龙江省能源可持续发展研究[D].东北林业大学学位论文,2007.
    [63]周高平,周直.基础设施项目投资风险灰色预测模型研究[J].中南公路工程,2006(2):145-149.
    [64]李晟,蒋维,胡国良.基于ANP的模糊多层次分析法的风电项目后评价研究[J].安徽电力,2009(4):83-86.
    [65]刘广应.基于VAR的信用风险定价[J].南京审计学院学报,2010(3):19-23.
    [66] UK Energy Paper?OurEnergyFuture-Creating a Low Carbon Economy[R]. Feb, 2003.
    [67]孟繁宇,卞云飞.基于不完全信息博弈的价格谈判策略及应用[J].华商,2007(2):8-9.
    [68] IPCC.Summary for Policymakers of climate change 2007: mitigation contribution ofworking group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental Panel on climate change[M]. London: Cambridge University Press,2007.
    [69]迟远英.基于低碳经济视角的我国风电产业发展研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2008.
    [70]李倩,张飞涟.基于风险价值VAR的BOT项目投融资风险分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2009(5):174-178.
    [71] Abdeen Mustafa Omer.Focus on Low Carbon Technologies: The Positive Solution[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2007.
    [72]刘涛.基于混沌神经网络的项目投资风险评价模型研究[J].财经视点,2009(3):54-56.
    [73]李彩.基于节能减排措施下的北京市能源优化模型[D].华北电力大学硕士学位论文,2009.
    [74] Ni Weidou?China’s energy? Challenges and strategies?Froniiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China[J],2007(l).
    [75]贾建容.基于蒙特卡洛模拟的火电建设项目投资风险估计[J].北京工商大学学报(自然科学版),2006(3):66-68.
    [76]陶奕宏.基于蒙特卡洛模拟的企业投资项目风险预测[J].今日南国,2009(12):75-76.
    [77] Reddy A.,Williams R.,Johansson T. Energy after Rio :Prospects and Challenges. United Nations Development Programme[J]. http://www.undp.org/seed/energy/ex -ec2en.htmlS.
    [78]马忠磊.基于清洁发展机制的能源结构改善与风险预测研究[D].华北电力大学工商管理硕士(MBA)学位论文,2007.
    [79]包月英,开小明.基于神经网络模型评价高技术项目投资风险[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2004(7):851-854.
    [80]王博.基于市场机制的可再生能源发展政策的均衡分析[D].西北大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [81] Kawase R.,Matsuoka Y., Fujino J. Decomposition Analysis of CO2 Emission in Long2term Climate Stabilization Seenarios[J].Energy Poliey,2006(34).
    [82]欧阳轶翔,雷井生.基于因子分析的企业研发项目风险评估模型及实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2010.
    [83]曾鸣,张艳馥,王鹤,贾君国.基于综合资源规划的供需资源优化组合模型[J].电力系统自动化,2007(3):24-28.
    [84]曾鸣,秦湘灵,马向春,杨玲玲,田廓.计及碳排放约束的电力综合资源规划模型与模拟分析[J].华东电力,2010(8):1103-1107.
    [85]曾鸣,刘玮,许文秀,郑琳,田廓.基于随机性动态规划方法的风电最优投资时机决策[J].华东电力,2010(8)1108-1113.
    [86] Treffers T.,Faaij A.P.C.,Sparkman J.,et al. Exploring the Possibilities for Setting up Sustainable Energy Systems for the Long Term: Two Visions for the Dutch Energy System in 2050[J]. EnergyPoliey,2005(33).
    [87]徐伟康.静态连续型博弈的计量经济模型研究[D].首都经济贸易大学博士学位论文,2010.
    [88]陈华荣.可持续发展战略管理研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [89]张庆兰.可再生能源发电并网调度自动化系统的研究与实现[D].华北电力大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [90]梁亚娟,樊京春.可再生能源发电技术温室气体减排效益分析[J].可再生能源,2004(1):23-25.
    [91] Johnston D.,Lowe R.,Bell M.An Exploration of the Technical Feasibility of Achieving CO2 Emission Reductions in Exeess of 60% Within the UK Housing Stock by the Year 2050[J]. Energy Policy,2005(33).
    [92]王悦.可再生能源经济激励主要制度研究[D].厦门大学硕士学位论文,2009.
    [93]刘尚余.可再生能源领域CDM项目开发的关键问题研究[D].我国科学技术大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [94]张喜荣,申要杰,李智.垃圾发电CDM项目风险评价及规避策略[J].电力建设,2010(8):6-12.
    [95]李金超.耒阳电厂建设项目市场分析预测与发展持续性评价研究[D].华北电力大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [96]郭军,连臣,继祥,大雷.辽宁省可再生能源温室气体减排潜力分析[J].可再生能源,008(4):109-112.
    [97] ChiYuanying,LiJingwen,ZhangShaojie.The Research for China Electric Power Energy Multivariate Structure Status Quo,Canadian Social Science,2008,Volume 4,Number 4.
    [98]苗锋.论综合资源规划与需求侧管理[J].研究与探讨,2007(9):23-24.
    [99] Wiser R.H..Renewable energy finance and project ownership the impact of alternative development structures on the cost of wind power[J].Fuel and Energy abstracts,1997,38(4):246.
    [100]范岩.能源可持续发展理论研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [101]姜述杰,赵伟英.浅谈秸秆生物质直燃发电技术[J].锅炉制造,2009(4):40-42.
    [102]胡偲,聂冬.浅析我国能源利用效率[J].学术探讨,2008(4):5-6.
    [103]郭若愚.清洁发展机制(CDM)在循环经济模式下的应用研究[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [104]马丽佳.清洁发展机制(CDM)在我国的应用[D].大连理工大学工商管理硕士(MBA)学位论文,2007.
    [105]订海兵.清洁发展机制在我国可再生能源领域实施进展与问题研究[D].厦门大学硕士学位论文,2009.
    [106]雷鸣.日本节能与新能源发展战略研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [107]韩杰.内蒙古自治区发展新能源的必要性及未来发展方向[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2010(23):77-78.
    [108]张志勇,张华玲,刘心报.双边多轮价格谈判中的成交估计方法研究[J].决策科学与评价,2009(12):362-366.
    [109] Martine A..Uyterlinde,Martin Junginger.Implications of technological learning on the prospects for renewable energy technologies in Europe[J].Energy Policy,2007(2):68-79.
    [110]杨永杰.碳交易的机理和现状[J].法律园地,2009:123~128.
    [111]何勇,张春艳,方皓.碳交易与低碳经济[J].浙江经济,2010(5):34-35.
    [112]刘嘉津,阮美飞.体育用品制造业固定资产投资规模的灰色动态模型探索[J].河北体育学院学报,2008(2):3-5.
    [113]贾丽虹.外部性理论及其政策边界[D].华大师范大学博士学位论文,2003.
    [114]王铮,朱永彬.我国各省区碳排放量状况及减排对策研究[J].战略与决策研究,2008(2):109-115.
    [115] UNFCCC.List of DOEs[EB/OL].httP://cdm.unfccc.int/DOE/list/index.html
    [116] Brammeier Fred L..Wind powered generator[J].Solar Energy,1996,57(2):39-47.
    [117] Munksgaard,J.,Larsen,A..Socio-economic assessment of wind power lessons from Denmark[J].Energy Policy,1998,26(2):85-93.
    [118]刘畅.我国清洁发展机制制度研究[J].环境与可持续发展,2010(2):33-36.
    [119]赵志远.县域经济产业发展理论与应用研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [120]曾庆群,章德宾,胡斌.移动商务竞价行为的精炼贝叶斯纳什均衡研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2009(4):617-620.
    [121]刘锐.重庆市清洁发展机制项目(CDM)潜力研究[D].重庆大学工程硕士学位论文,2008.
    [122]姜克隽,胡秀莲,庄幸,刘强,朱松丽.我国2050年的能源需求与CO2排放情景[J].国内策略,2008(5):296-302.
    [123]何琼.我国能源安全问题探讨及对策研究[J].我国安全科学学报,2009(6):52-57.
    [124]张慧明.我国的能源现状及发展趋势[C].全国化工热工设计技术中心站2004年年会论文集,2004.
    [125] Kase R..An evaluation of wind energy potential as a power generation sourcein Kutahya , Turkey[J].Energy Conversion and Management , 2004 , 45(11-12) :1631-1641.
    [126] Lans Bovenberg,de Mooij,Ruud A.,Environmental taxation reform and endogenous growth[J].Journal of Public Economics,1997,63(2):207-237.
    [127]沈可挺,徐嵩龄,贺菊煌.我国实施CDM项目的CO2减排资源:一种经济—技术—能源—环境条件下CGE模型的评估[J].理论与方法,2002(7): 109-114.
    [128] Economic Survey of Germany 2006[R].Organization for economic cooperation and development,2006.
    [129] Holttinen,H.,Tuhkanen,S..The effect of wind power on CO2 abatement in the Nordic Countries[J].Energy Policy,2004, 32(14):1639-1652.
    [130] Johnston,D.,Lowe,R.,Bell,M..An Exploration of the Technical Feasibility of Achieving CO2Emission Reductions in Excess of 60%Within the UK Housing Stock by the Year 2050[J].Energy Policy,2005,(33):1643-1659.
    [131] Stuart Ross,Use of List Cycle Assessment in Environmental Management[J], Environmental Management,2002,29(1):132-142.
    [132]姜国权.市场社会主义劳动产权理论研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [133] Bruvoll,Annegrete,Taxing virgin materials.An approach to waste problems[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling,1998, 22(1):15-29.
    [134]我国电力企业联合会.我国电力工业统计数据分析[M].北京,2010.
    [135]联合国全球气候变化委员会http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
    [136]我国情节发展机制网http://cdm.ccchina.gov.cn/web/index.asp
    [137] A Report to The Club of Rome.The Limit to Growth.The original of this document can be found at http://www.clubofrome.org/doc/limits.rtf Ehrli Ch P.,Holdren J.P., Impact of Population Growth.Science,1974,(171):1212-1217
    [138] Treffers,T.,Faaij,APC,Sparkman,J.,Seebregts,A..Exploring the Possibilities forSetting up Sustainable Energy Systems for the LongTerm:Two Visions for the Dutch Energy System in 2050[J].Energy Policy,2005,(33): 1723-1743.
    [139]黄宗远.产业发展的机遇与机遇型产业的发展[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2008.
    [140] UNFCCC.Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Conventionon ClimateChange(UNFCCC)[R].FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1. Bonn,1997.
    [141] IPCC.In:Metz,B,Davidson,O,Swart,R,Pan,J.(Eds.),Climate Change 2001:Mitigation:Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M].Cambridge University Press ,Cambridge,UK,2001.
    [142] Lawrence J.Hill&Stanton W.Hadley.Federal tax effects on the financialattractiveness of renewable versus conventional power plants[J].Energy Policy,1995,.23(7):593-597.
    [143]姜敬波,张永春.水电项目投资风险分析及管理方法研究[J].我国农村水利水电,2010(2):139-143.
    [144]尹鸿雁.我国公共产品供给研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2010.
    [145]吴晓霞,吴亚楠.我国企业参与CDM的风险及其控制[J].经济观察,2010(9):7-8.
    [146]董慧芹,蒋栋,孟亚君,冯世钧.我国节能减排与清洁发展机制研究[J].节能技术,2009(6):546-549.
    [147] Aaron Cosbey.Border Carbon Adjustment[J].International Institute for Sustainable development,2008(8):23-24
    [148] Ahmad N.,Wyckoff A..Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embidied in International Trade of Goods[D].OECE STI Working Paper,2003(15):134-135
    [149] Alistair Fnulph.Environment Policy Instruments and Imperfectly Competitive International Trade[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,1996(6):34-36
    [150] Anqing Shi.The Impact of Population Pressure on Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions,1975-1996:Evidence from Pooled Crosscountry Data[J].Ecological Economics,2003(44):29-42
    [151] An Feng and Amanda Sauer.Comparison of Passenger Vehicle Fuel Economy and GHG Emission Standards Around the World. The Pew Center on Global Climate Change,2004(11):26-30
    [152] Bin Shui, Robert C. Harriss. The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade[J]. Energy Policy,2006(34):4063-4069
    [153] BP.2010.BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2009. http://www.bp.com
    [154] Brian R. Copeland and M.Scott Taylor.International Trade and the Encironment:A Franework for Analysis[D],NBER Working Paper,2001(10):8540
    [155] Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Trade and Transboundary Pollution[J], American Economic Review,1995(4):716-737
    [156] Doran.K. United States Climate Policy:Using Market-based Strategies to AchieveGreenhouse Gas Emission Reductions[J]. Envirionmental and Energy Law and Policy Journal,2008(3):31-83
    [157] D.Bodansky, S.Chou and C.Jorge-Tresolini. International Climate Efforts beyond 2012[J] , Pew Center in Global Climate Change , 2004(11) , http ://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/2012%20new.pdf Accessed on July 2,2009.
    [158] Electric Power Annual and Energy Information ministration. Planned Nameplate Capacity Additions from New Generators, by Energy Source, U.S.Department of Energy,2007(10), http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat2p4.html.
    [159] Erik B.Bluemel.Regional Regulatory Initiatives Addressing GHG Leakage in the USA.2008.
    [160] Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2007. Chapter 5,U.S.Department of Energy,2007(5), http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html.
    [161] Flynt Leverett and Jeffrey Bader. Managing China-U.S.Energy Competition in the Middle East. The Washington Quarterly,2006(29):187-201.
    [162] Frankhauser,Samuel,Richard,et al. Extensions and Alteratives to Climate Change Impact Valuation:On the Critique of IPCC Working Group III’s Impact Estimate. Environment and Development Economics,1998(3):59-81
    [163] Halvorssen, A.M. UNFCCC,The Kyoto Protocal and the WTO-brewing Conflicts are They Mutually Supportive?.Dencer Journal of International Law and Policy,2008(36):369-378
    [164] House of Representatives of the U.S. American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.
    [165] Hoel,Michael.International Environmental Conventions:The Case of Uniform Reductions of Emissions.Environmental and Resource Economics,1992(2):141-159
    [166] IEA.CO2 Emission from Fuel Combustion.Paris:OECD Publishing,2008
    [167] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC).4th Assessment Report, Working Group I, Summary for Policy Makers.2007.
    [168] Jiang Lin,Nan Zhou,Mark Levine,David Fridley. Taking Out 1 Billion Tons of CO2:The Magic of China’s 11th Five Year Plan?.Energy Policy,2008.
    [169] J.Andrew Hoerner , Frank Muller.Carbon taxes for climate protection in a competitive world. A paper prepared for the Swiss Federal Office for Foreign Economic Affairs.
    [170] Janssen M,De Vries. The Battle of Perpectives:A Multi-agent Model with Adaptive Response to Climate Change[J].Ecology Economies,1998(26):43-45
    [171] Manne, Alan.S.,Richard.Richels. Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Cost of CO2 Emission Limits. Cambridge,M.A.:The MIT Press,1992:24-30
    [172] Nakano S.,Okamura A.,Sakutai N.,Suzuki M., Tijo Y., Yamano N. The Measurement of CO2 Embodiments in International Trade:Evidence from the Harmonised Input-Output and Bilateral Trade Database[D].OECE STE Working Paper,2009(3)
    [173] Nicholas. The Economics of Climate Change:The Stern Review,Cambrige University Press,2007.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700