经济开放、异质性和技术创新研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
《中国十二五发展规划》明确提出“以开放促发展、促改革、促创新”的指导思路,充分利用对外开放,加大我国科技创新力度,缩小与发达国家的距离,成为当前我国经济发展所面临的重要课题。那么对外开放、企业异质性与全要素生产率间存在怎样的相互作用机理?如何解读开放型经济体系下中国工业行业技术进步模式的选择问题?创新驱动型经济增长模式的微观基础何在?以这些问题为导向,本论文研究重点集中在如下几个方面。
     首先,本论文运用参数与半参数相结合的方法分别测度和比较分析了1993-2010年30个省份、36个工业行业以及8443家内资企业和6031家外资企业共计14474家企业的全要素生产率,并进一步探讨了行业、地区的异质属性对全要素生产率的影响。其次,论文利用中国微观企业面板数据,从超越对数生产函数出发,纳入出口状态变量,充分控制企业异质属性,深入考察出口行为与我国企业生产率之间的作用机理;并基于“自我选择”假说和“出口中学”假说之争,进一步检验出口行为和企业生产率间的因果关联。再次,利用生产函数溢值法,考察了外商直接投资与企业全要素生产率之间的关系。引入多门槛模型,考察是否存在技术差距的“门槛”,检验了外商直接投资技术溢出的持续性问题。相关研究结果表明尽管过去20年间中国工业行业全要素生产率有了普遍提高,但当前本土企业与国际技术领先尚有较大差距。出口企业的生产率相对非出口企业高出20%-30%,而这一生产率优势被较为稳健的归结于“出口中学”效应的结果。就外商直接投资而言,内资具有相匹配的吸收能力是外商直接投资技术外溢发生的前提;本土企业可以充分利用外资、通过技术模仿获得较自主创新更为“快捷”的技术进步,获得后发优势;但随着本土技术水平趋近于外资技术,模仿成本的增加以及内外资在产品市场日趋激烈的竞争导致技术外溢表现出边际递减的特性,企业自生能力的培育迫在眉睫。
     进一步的,论文提出了技术差距的“双刃”性将导致外商直接投资技术外溢非线性变化的假说,进一步通过将技术模仿和技术外溢同时纳入质量阶梯型增长模型,构建吻合中国经济发展实际的内生增长模型。通过求解一般均衡状态下的稳态均衡解剖析开放经济条件下研发资源在自主创新与技术模仿间的最优分配,并深入分析均衡条件下技术差距与技术模仿之间的内生关联,为研究技术后发国技术进步模式及决定机制提供了分析框架。其次,本论文将企业的异质性拓展为竞争性技术、国际贸易成本和具有异质性技术水平三类因素的综合,推陈出技术变量和政策变量内生驱动的一般均衡模型,考察贸易条件下不同类型企业的福利分析,为分析开放经济系统中技术变迁提供来自微观层面的分析框架。相关结论为解析开放型经济体系下中国工业行业技术进步模式的选择问题提供了源自理论层面的支撑。
     为回答第三个问题,论文采用中国企业微观数据,将外商直接投资、进口贸易、出口贸易和国际技术许可同时纳入分析框架,充分考虑包括企业所有制类型、行业特征等异质性问题对技术创新的影响,通过构建Probit随机效应模型考察了开放经济条件下中国本土企业自主创新的内生决定机制。同时,本论文采用27个发达国家和59个发展中国家的面板数据从制度层面考察了开放经济条件下技术创新的决定问题,并聚焦于比较分析知识产权制度与技术创新间的作用机理在南、北国家间的异同。相关实证研究结论表明:不同国际技术转移方式对企业技术创新的影响存在显著差异性。外商直接投资并未促进企业技术创新;相比之下,国际贸易和国际技术许可对中国企业自生能力的培育起到更为积极的作用。而从企业所有制结构来看,外资占比较高的企业,自主创新能力匮乏;而内资企业,尤其是民营企业扮演着中国经济转型阶段技术创新的主体。而就影响技术创新的制度因素而言,尽管知识产权保护在一定条件下促进了一国的技术创新,但过强的知识产权保护将降低技术创新的速率,因此存在一个最优的知识产权保护范围;且发达国家的最优知识产权保护力度高于发展中国家,因此发达国家强调发展中国家应具有与发达国家一致的知识产权保护力度是不符合发展中国家长期利益的。
The Twelfth Five-Year Development Plan has put forward the guiding idea that let open policy promote economic development, reform, and innovation. Taking full advantage of the open policy, strengthening scientific and technological innovation, and narrowing the technology gap with the developed countries have became one of the most important issues that China's economic development facing. Under this situation, the paper tries to answer the following questions, what is the mechanism between open economy, firm heterogeneity and total factor productivity? How to interpret the choice of technological progress mode in open economies? What is the determinant mechanism of innovation from the micro-perspective? Based on these questions, this dissertation focuses on the following aspects.
     This study, first, estimates and compares analysis of the total factor of productivity of30provinces and36industrial sectors from1993to2010and14474enterprises including8443domestic and6031foreign-funded enterprises using parameters and semi-parametric econometric methods. Further study is operated to explore the impact of heterogeneous properties of the industries and regions on total factor productivity. Second, this dissertation introduces the status variable of export behavior into trans-logarithmic production function, controls the firm heterogeneity properties, and examines in depth the mechanism of export behavior and Chinese enterprises'productivity using firm level panel data. Based on the controversy of self-selection hypothesis and the hypothesis of learning-by-export, we further test the causal link between export behavior and firm productivity. Using the production function spillover method, this dissertation investigates the relationship between foreign direct investment and enterprises'total factor productivity. We examine whether there is a threshold in terms of technology gap by introducing the multi-threshold model to examine the sustainability of FDI technology spillovers. The research results point out that despite the improvement of total factor productivity in Chinese industrial sectors in the past20years, there is a significant technology gap between domestic and international enterprises. The empirical results also indicate that the productivity of exporters is around20-30%higher than non-exporters. Such productivity advantages can be attributed to learning-by-exporting effects rather than self-selection efforts; that is, export activity promotes a firm's productivity. As for the foreign direct investment, the premise of technology spillovers is that the domestic enterprises have sufficient technology levels and absorptive capabilities for learning and imitation. But, in the long run, the technology spillovers from FDI will slow with the further reduction of the technology gap, which we call the marginal decrease of FDI technology spillover effects. Hence it is inevitable to cultivate the independent R&D capability of domestic enterprises.
     Furthermore, this dissertation proposes a "double-edged" hypothesis in terms of technology gap which leads to nonlinear evolution of FDI technology spillovers. Also the paper considers both technology imitation and innovation into the quality ladder growth model and construct the endogenous growth model which is consistent with the reality of China's economic development. After solving the steady-state equilibrium solution, the study explains the optimal allocation of R&D resources between the independent innovation and technology to imitate, and provide a theoretical analytical framework for decision mechanisms of technological progress mode of a country that is backward in technology. In addition, we expand the concept of heterogeneity into the comprehensive one of competing technologies, the cost of international trade and the technological level. Based on stated above, we construct the general equilibrium model combining the variables of technology and policy variables, and analyze the welfare under various conditions of trade. This work provides a theoretical analysis framework for technological progress in the open economy from the micro-perspective. Relevant conclusions from theoretical model explain the endogenous choice of industrial technological progress mode in open economy.
     To answer the third question, the dissertation examines the endogenous decision mechanism of innovation using the Chinese firm-level panel data by applying Probit random effects model. Especially, we introduce four main channels of international technology transfer into analysis framework, such as foreign direct investment, imports, exports and technology licensing, and fully consider the impact of heterogeneity issues on the firm's innovation, including firm's different ownership type, industry characteristics and so forth. Using panel data from27developed countries and57developing countries, the study systemically examines the relationship between IPR and technological innovation after controlling for a potential endogenous problem. According to the empirical results, we do not find the obvious evidence that FDI spur the firm technology innovation. However, the research shows that international trade and technology licensing present more positive role on promoting firm innovation in China. Furthermore, the firm with higher proportion of foreign capital has lower independent innovation capability. Domestic enterprises, especially private enterprises, play an important part in technology innovation during China's economic transformation. As for the impact of institution on innovation, empirical results support the optimal IPR hypothesis. Paper finds that the threshold effects of stronger IPR on innovation depended on the initial IPR level. Neither very strong IPR nor very weak IPR are conducive to innovation. Furthermore, the optimal level of IPR in developed countries is higher rather than in developing countries; this difference implies that adoption of IPR standard of developed countries may be inefficient for developing countries.
引文
[1]UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2011,2011-7
    [2]IMF. World Economic Outlook,2011-9
    [3]World Bank. Global Economic Prospects,2011-6
    [4]郑联盛.全球经济形势近况分析.中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所国际金融研究中心简报,2011-10
    [5]林毅夫,张鹏飞.适宜技术,技术选择和经济增长.经济学(季刊),2005,(5)
    [6]Paul M. Romer. Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(5):1002-1037
    [7]Judd, Kenneth L. On the performance of Patents. Econometrica, 1985,53:567-585
    [8]Romer, Paul M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal Political Economy, 1990,98:71-102
    [9]Rivera-Batiz, Luis A & Romer, Paul M. Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,1991,106(2):531-55
    [10]Barro, Robert J., Xavier Sala-i., Martin. Economic Growth. Boston:McGraw-Hill,1995
    [11]Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman. Trade, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth. European Economic Review,1991a,35:517-526
    [12]Younge, Alwyn. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade. Journal of Political Economy,1991,106:369-406
    [13]Younge, Alwyn. Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing. Journal of Political Economy,1993,101:443-472
    [14]Susanto Basu, David N. Weil. Appropriate Technology and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,1998,113(4):1025-1054
    [15]Chol-Won Li. Endogenous vs. Semi-Endogenous Growth in a Two-R&D-Sector Model. Economic Journal,2000,110(462):C109-C122
    [16]Schumpeter, Joseph A. Theory Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1934
    [17]Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman. Product Development and International Trade. Journal of Political Economy,1989,97:12611283
    [18]Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman. Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. Review of Economic Studies,1991b,58:43-61
    [19]Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman. Quality Ladders and Product Cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economic,1991c,106:557-586
    [20]Aghion, Philippe, Peter Howitt. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica,1992,60:321-351
    [21]Zeng, J. Reexamining the interaction between innovation and capital accumulation. Journal of Macroeconomics,2003,25:541-560
    [22]Carlaw, K. I., R.G. Lipsey. GPT-Driven, Endogenous Growth. Economic Journal,2006,116:155-74
    [23]Krugman Paul. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. Journal of International Economics,1979,9:469-79
    [24]Krugman Paul. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review,1980,70:950-59
    [25]Dixit Avinash K., Joseph E., Stiglitz. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. The American Economic Review,1977,67(3):297-308
    [26]Krugman Paul. Intra-industry specialization and the gains from trade. Journal of Political Economy,1981,89:959-73
    [27]Krugman, Paul. New Theories of Trade among Industrial Countries. American Economic Review,1983,73(2):343-47
    [28]Helpman Elhanan, Paul Krugman. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. MIT Press Books, The MIT Press,1987,1(12)
    [29]Bernard A., Jensen B. Exporters, Jobs and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing, 1976-1987. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics,1995, 67-119
    [30]Melitz, M. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica,2003,71:1695-1725
    [31]Antras Po. Firms, Contracts and Trade Structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003,118(4):1375-1418
    [32]Baldwin, J. R., W. Gu. Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Canadian Journal of Economics,2003, 36(3):634-57
    [33]Balassa Bela. Development Strategies in Semi-Industrial Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1982
    [34]Harrison, A. Openness and growth:a time series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics,1996,48:419-447
    [35]Kuznets S. Modern Economic Growth:Rate, Structure and Spread. New Haven: Yale University Press,1966
    [36]S. Edwards. Openness, Productivity and Growth:What do We Really Know?. The Economic Journal,1998,108(447):383-398
    [37]McCulloch Neil, L Alan Winters, Xavier Cirera. Trade Liberation and Poverty: A handbook.www.cepr.org/PRESS/P144,2001
    [38]UNCTAD. Problem s and Protectionism and Structural Adjustment Introduction and Part I:Restrictions on Trade and Structural Adjustment. Report by UNCTAD,1986
    [39]Bijit Bora, Aki Kuwahara, Sam Laird. Quantification on Non-Tariff Measures. UNCTAD Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Issue, 2002,18
    [40]OECD. National Policies and Agricultural Trade. Paris,1987
    [41]Anderson, J. E, P. Neary. Measuring the Restriction of Trade Policy. World Bank Economic Review,1994,8(1):151-169
    [42]Halit Yanikkaya. Trade openness and economic growth:a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics,2003,72:57-89
    [43]Sachs Jeffery, Andrew Warner. Economic reform and process of global integration. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity,1995,(1):1-118
    [44]Rodriguez, F., Rodrik, D. Trade policy and economic growth:a skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Cambridge:MIT Press,2000
    [45]Pritchett L., Sethi G. Tariff rates, tariff revenue, and tariff reform:some new facts. The World Bank Economic Review,1994,8(1):1-16
    [46]David Dollar. Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly:Evidence from 95 LDCs,1976-1985. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1992
    [47]Summers Robert, Heston Alan. A New Set of International Comparisons of Real Product and Price Levels Estimates for 130 Countries,1950-1985. Review of Income and Wealth, Blackwell Publishing,1988
    [48]Harrison A. Openness and Growth:A Time series, Cross-country Analysis for Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics,1996,(48):419-447
    [49]Don P. Clark. Do outward-oriented developing economies industrialize faster?. International Economic Journal,1997,11(3):75-83
    [50]Anderson Kym. Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions:How Far Have We Come?. The World Economy,2003,26(4):413-440
    [51]Amelia U.S. Paulino. Trade Liberalization and Economic Performance:Theory and Evidence for Developing Countries. The World Economy,2005,28(6): 783-821
    [52]Pedro C. Ferreira, Alberto Trejos. On the output effects of barriers to trade. International Economic Review,2006,47(4):1319-1340
    [53]Armah Bartholomew. Does Latin-American has more to gain from exchange rate liberalization than sub-Saharan Africa?. International Economic Journal, 2000,14(2):113-132
    [54]L. Patrick, O. Marcelo, S. Javier. Does Globalization cause a higher Concentration of International Trade and Investment flow?. WTO working paper,1998(8)
    [55]Learner E., Edward. Measures of Openness. NBER Chapters, in:Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1988,145-204
    [56]Wolf Holger. Trade Orientation:Measurement and Consequences. Estudios de Economia,1993,20(20):52-72
    [57]McCallum, J. National Borders Matter:Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. The American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623
    [58]Stewart W. Institutional Quality and Its Effect on Trade:an empirical analysis. UBC Economic Honors Thesis,1999
    [59]Poncet, S. Measuring Chinese Domestic and International Integration. China Economic Review,2003,14(1):1-21
    [60]Poncet, S. A Fragmented China:Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration. Review of International Economics,2005, 13(3):409-430.
    [61]Bai, C.-E., Y. Du, Z. Tao, S. Y. Tong. Local Protectionism and Regional Specialization:Evidence from China's Industries. Journal of International Economics,2004,63(2):397-417
    [62]李善同,侯永志,刘云中等.中国国内地方保护的调查报告—基于企业抽样调查的分析.经济研究参考,2004a,(6):2-18
    [63]李善同,侯永志,陈波.中国国内地方保护的调查报告—非企业抽样调查结果的初步分析.经济研究参考,2004b,(18):27-31
    [64]黄赜琳,王敬云.地方保护与市场分割:来自中国的经验数据.中国工业经济, 2006,(2):60-67
    [65]黄赜琳,王敬云.基于产业结构区际贸易壁垒的实证分析.财经研究,2007,(3):4-16
    [66]赵永亮,徐勇.国内贸易与区际边界效应:保护与偏好.管理世界,2007,(9):37-47
    [67]赵永亮,徐勇,苏桂富.区际壁垒与贸易的边界效应.世界经济,2008,(2):17-29
    [68]Young, A. The Razor's Edge:Distortions and Incremental Reform in the People's Republic of China. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2000, 115(4):1091-1135
    [69]Chen, N. A. Intra-National versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter?. Journal of International Economics,2004, 63(1):93-118
    [70]Evans, C. L. Border Effects and the Availability of Domestic Products Abroad. The Canadian Journal of Economics,2006,39(1):211-246
    [71]Head, K., T. Mayer. Non-Europe:the Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive,2000,136(2):284-314
    [72]Hillberry, R. Aggregation Bias, Compositional Change, and the Border Effect. U.S. International Trade Commission working papers,2001-04-B
    [73]Posner, M. International Investment and Technical Change.Oxford Economic Papers,1961,(8):323-41
    [74]Hirsch, S. The US Electronics Industry in International Trade. National Institute Economic Review,1965,(34):92-107
    [75]Vernon,V. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,(5):190-207
    [76]Findlay R. Relative Backwardness Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer Technology:A Simple Dynamic Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1978, (62):1-16
    [77]Romer P.M. Two Strategies for Economic Development:Using Ideas and Producing Ideas. In Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics,Washington, D. C. World Bank,1992
    [78]Sachs, J., Warner A. Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers of Economic Activity,1995, (1):1-118
    [79]Gene M. Grossman, Elhanan Helpman. Technology and Trade, NBER,1994, 4926
    [80]Helpman E. The structure of foreign trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1999, (13):121-144
    [81]Griffith, R., S. Redding, J. Van Reenen. Mapping Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics,2000,86(4):883-895
    [82]Keller, W. International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, (9):752-782
    [83]Lai Mingyong, Wang Hua, Shujin Zhu. Double-Edged Effects of Technology Gap and Technology Spillovers:Theory and Chinese Industry Study. China Economic Review,2009,20(3):414-424
    [84]齐俊妍.基于产品技术含量和附加值分布的国际贸易结构分析方法研究.现代财经,2006,(8)
    [85]齐俊妍.中国是否出口了更多高技术产品——基于技术含量和附加值的考察.世界经济研究,2008,(9)
    [86]祝树金,邓群飞.中国-东盟的贸易结构和技术水平的动态变迁与比较.湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(4)
    [87]祝树金,陈艳,谢锐.“龙象之争”与“龙象共舞”——基于出口技术结构的中印贸易关系.统计研究,2009,(4)
    [88]范红忠.有效需求规模假说,研发投入与国家自主创新能力.经济研究,2007,(3):33-44
    [89]余道先,刘海云.技术创新的贸易效应研究:一个文献综述.财贸研究,2007,(5):65-72
    [90]饶晓辉.人力资本.出口贸易与我国经济增长的动态关系.国际贸易问题,2007,(3):34-39
    [91]郭炳南,朱幼恩.人力资本,技术创新与出口贸易绩效.技术经济与管理研究,2009,(6):48-52
    [92]Antras Pol, Elhanan Helpman. Global Sourcing. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,2004,112(3):552-580
    [93]Helpman E., Marc J. Melitz & Stephen R. Yeaple. Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2004,94(1):300-316
    [94]Almeida, R., Fernandes, A. M. Openness and Technological Innovations in Developing Countries:Evidence from Firm-Level Surveys. Washington D.C, World Bank, Policy Research,2007,3985
    [95]Salomon Robert and Jin Byungchae. Does Knowledge Spill to Leaders or Laggards? Exploring Industry Heterogeneity in Learning by Exporting. Journal of International Business Studies,2008,39:132-150
    [96]谢涓,李恒.对外贸易与内生性经济增长模型及其分析.统计与决策,2010,(6)
    [97]张超.产品创新,供求互动与中国经济内生增长研究.科研管理,2011,(10)
    [98]黄新飞,舒元.中国省际贸易开放与经济增长的内生性研究.管理世界,2011,(7)
    [99]Lucas, R. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics,1988, (22):3-42
    [100]王华,赖明勇,柒江艺.国际技术转移,异质性与中国企业技术创新研究.管理世界,2010,(12):131-142
    [101]Barro, R. J., JW Lee. International Comparisons of Educational Attainment. Journal of Monetary Economics,1993,(32):361-394
    [102]Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, JW. Lee. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?. Journal of International Economics, 1998,(45):115-135
    [103]De Gregorio, J. De Gregorio. Economic growth in Latin America. Journal of Development Economics,1992(39):58-84
    [104]王红领,李稻葵,冯俊新.FDI与自主研发:基于行业数据的研究.经济研究,2006,(2):44-55
    [105]Li Xiaoying, Xia ming Liu and David Parker. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in the Chinese manufacturing sector. Economic Systems, 2001,(25):305-321
    [106]Wei, Y., Liu, X. Foreign Direct Investment in China Determinants and Impact. Edward Elgar,2001
    [107]Cheung K., Lin P. Spillover Effects of FDI on Innovation in China:Evidence from Provincial Data. China Economic Review,2004, (15):25-44
    [108]Young, Stephen, Lan Ping. Technology transfer to China through foreign direct investment. Regional Studies,1997,31(7):669-679
    [109]Fan, Xiaoqin, Peter G. Warr. Foreign Investment, Spillover Effects and the Technology Gap:Evidence from China. Working Paper in Trade and Development No.00-03, The Australian National University,2000
    [110]张海洋.R&D两面性,外资活动与中国工业生产率增长.经济研究,2005,(5):107-117
    [111]范承泽,胡一帆,郑红亮.FDI对国内企业技术创新影响的理论与实证研究.经济研究,2008,(1):89-101.
    [112]邢斐,张建华.外商技术转移对我国自主研发的影响.经济研究,2009,(6): 94-103
    [113]Kokko A. Tansini. Local technological capability and spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. Journal of Development Studies,1996,(34): 602-611
    [114]Kugler M. The spectral diffusion of spillovers from foreign direct investment. Mimeo, University of South Campton,2001
    [115]Kinoshita, Y. R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI:Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. CEPR working paper,2001,349a
    [116]Manoj Pant, Sangeeta Mondal. FDI, Technology Transfer and Spillover:A Case Study of India. Discussion Papers in Economics,2010
    [117]姚洋,张奇.中国工业企业技术效率分析.经济研究,2001,(10):13-28
    [118]黄日福.FDI的技术外溢:基于中部地区的实证研究.求索,2007,(2):42-43
    [119]王欣,陈丽珍.外商直接投资,前后向关联与技术溢出——基于江苏制造业面板数据的经验研究.数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(11):85-97
    [120]燕波,李磊.国外技术研发外溢对我国生产力的影响.上海经济研究,2009,(3):28-33
    [121]邵敏,刘重力.外资进入与技能溢价——兼论我国FDI技术外溢的偏向性.世界经济研究,2011,(1):67-74
    [122]Kogut, B., Zander, U. Knowledge of Firm, Integration Capabilities and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science,1992,(3)
    [123]阳小晓,赖明勇.FDI与技术外溢:基于金融发展的理论视角及实证研究.数量经济技术经济研究,2006,(6):72-81
    [124]Cohen Wesley M., Daniel A., Levinthal. Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(1):128-152
    [125]赖明勇,张新,彭水军等.经济增长的源泉:人力资本,研究开发与技术外溢.中国社会科学,2005,(2):32-46
    [126]Xu, B. Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics,2000, (62):477-493
    [127]何洁.外国直接投资对中国工业部门外溢效应的进一步精确量化.世界经济,2000,(12):29-36
    [128]沈坤荣,耿强.外商直接投资,技术外溢与内生经济增长——基于中国数据的计量检验与实证分析.中国社会科学,2001,(5):82-93
    [129]王志鹏,李子奈.外商直接投资,技术外溢与内生经济增长.世界经济文汇,2004,(3)23-33
    [130]陈涛涛.中国FDI行业内溢出效应的内在机制研究.世界经济,2003,(9)
    [131]陈涛涛.影响中国外商直接投资溢出效应的行业特征.中国社会科学,2003,(4)
    [132]李蕊.FDI与中国工业自主创新:基于地区面板数据的实证分析.世界经济研究,2008,(2):15-21
    [133]吴永求.FDI对国内企业研发行为的影响——理论模型与中国的经验.世界经济研究,2010,(1):82-86
    [134]Hurley R., Hult T. Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning-an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing,1998, 62:42-54
    [135]Souitaris V. External communication determinants of innovation in the context of a newly industrialized country:a comparison of objective and perceptual results from Greece. Technovation,2001,21(1):25-34
    [136]Romijn H., Albaladejo M. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy,2002, (31):1053-1067.
    [137]Caloghirou Y., Kastelli I., Tsakanikas A. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources:complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation,2004,24(1):29-39
    [138]易晓文.基于BP神经网络的民营企业技术创新能力的模糊综合评价.数量经济技术经济研究,2003,(8)
    [139]曹庆奎,任向阳,刘琛等.基于粗集.未确知测度模型的企业技术创新能力评价研究.系统工程理论与实践,2006,(4)
    [140]解学梅,曾赛星.基于分类回归的企业技术创新影响因素测评.工业工程与管理,2009,(6)
    [141]Anselin, L., Varga, A., and Acs, Z. Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics,1997,42
    [142]Blind, K., and Grupp, H. Interdependencies between the Science and Technology Infrastructure and Innovation Activities in German Regions: Empirical findings and Policy Consequences. Research Policy,1999,28
    [143]Bode, E. The Spatial Pattern of Localized R&D Spillovers:An Empirical Investigation for Germany. Journal of Economic Geography,2004,(4)
    [144]陈国宏,郭弢.我国FDI,知识产权保护与自主创新能力关系实证研究.中国工业经济,2008,(4)
    [145]疏礼兵.浙江民营中小企业集群式技术创新模式选择.科技管理研究,2007,(1)
    [146]夏冬.我国企业技术创新中所有权结构作用的实证研究.科技进步与对策,2008,(11)
    [147]Keller, W. International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, (9):752-782
    [148]Griffith, R., S. Redding, J. Van Reenen. Mapping Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics,2000,86(4):883-895
    [149]范红忠.有效需求规模假说:研发投入与国家自主创新能力.经济研究,2007,(3)
    [150]李平,崔喜君,刘健.中国自主创新中研发资本投入产出绩效分析—兼论人力资本和知识产权保护的影响.中国社会科学,2007,(2)
    [151]高良谋,李宇.企业规模与技术创新倒U关系的形成机制与动态拓展.管理世界,2009,(8)
    [152]Llerena P., Oltra V. Diversity of Innovative Strategy as A Source of Technological Performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2002,13(2):179-120
    [153]Nguyen P., P. P. Saviotti, M.Trommetter. Variety and the Evolution of Refinery Processing. Industrial and Corporate Change,2005,14(3):469-500
    [154]Almeida, R., Fernandes, A. M. Openness and Technological Innovations in Developing Countries:Evidence from Firm-Level Surveys. Washington D.C, World Bank, Policy Research,2007,3985
    [155]Salomon Robert, Jin Byungchae. Does Knowledge Spill to Leaders or Laggards? Exploring Industry Heterogeneity in Learning by Exporting. Journal of International Business Studies,2008,39:132-150
    [156]Greunz, L. Industrial Structure and Innovation--Evidence from European Regions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2004,14(5):563-592
    [157]Woerter, M. Industrial Diversity and Its Impact on the Innovation Performance of Firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2009,19(5):675-700.
    [158]吴玉鸣.空间计量经济模型在省域研发与创新中的应用研究.数量经济技术经济研究,2006,(5)
    [159]孙文杰,沈坤荣.技术引进与中国企业的自主创新:基于分位数回归模型的经验研究.世界经济,2007,(1)
    [160]彭恒文,杜运苏.网络效应,市场结构及技术进步——基于异质性偏好视角的 分析.产业经济研究,2010,(1)
    [161]中国社会科学院工业经济研究所.2011年中国工业发展报告.北京:经济管理出版社,2011,51
    [162]Yasar, M., R. Raciborski, B. Poi. Production function estimation in Stata using the Olley and Pakes method. Stata Journal,2008,8(2):221-31
    [163]Yeaple, S.R. A Simple Model of Firm Heterogeneity International Trade and Wages. Journal of International Economics,2005,65(1):1-20
    [164]Arellano, M. and S.R. Bond. Some tests of specification for panel data:Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies,1991,58(2):277-97
    [165]Arellano, M., and O. Bover. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics,1995,68(1): 29-51
    [166]Blundell, R.W., S.R. Bond. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics,1998,87:115-43
    [167]Olley, S.G., A. Pakes. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica,1996,64(6):1263-97
    [168]Loecker, D. Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics,2007,73(1):69-79
    [169]Levinsohn, J., A. Petrin. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies,2003,70(2):317-342
    [170]Jeffrey M. Woodridge. Introductory econometrics:a modern approach. South-Western College Publishing,2000
    [171]Blalock, Ga. and J.P. Gertler. Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting. Journal of Development Economics,2004,75(2):397-416
    [172]李红玉,王皓,郑玉歆.企业演化:中国工业生产率增长的重要途径.经济研究,2008,(6)
    [173]Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond. GMM Estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, Taylor and Francis Journals,2000,19(3):321-340
    [174]Baldwin, J. R., W. Gu. Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Canadian Journal of Economics,2003, 36(3):634-57
    [175]赵伟,李淑贞.出口与企业生产率:由实证而理论的最新拓展.国际贸易问题,2007(7):24-30
    [176]Clerides, S.K., S. Lach, J.R. Tybout. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,113(3):903-47
    [177]Wang Hua, Mingyong Lai. Export behavior and firm productivity in China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies,2009,7(4):409-428
    [178]Bernard, A.B., J.B. Jensen. Exceptional exporter performance:Cause, effect, or both?. Journal of International Economics,1999,47(1):1-25
    [179]Aw, B.Y., S. Chung, Mark J. Roberts. Productivity and turnover in the export market:Micro-level evidence from the republic of Korea and Taiwan (China). The World Bank Economic Review,2000,14(1):65-90
    [180]Delgado, Miguel A., J.C. Farinas, S. Ruano. Firm productivity and export markets:A non-parametric approach. Journal of International Economics,2002, 57(2):397-422
    [181]Bernard, A.B., J. Eaton, J.B. Jensen, S. Kortum. Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review,2003,93(4):1268-90
    [182]Wagner, J. The causal effect of exports on firm size and labor productivity:First evidence from a matching approach. Economics Letters,2002,77(2):287-92
    [183]Castellani, D. Export behavior and productivity growth:Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Review of World Economics,2002,138(4):605-28
    [184]Bernard, A.B., and J. Jensen. Why some firms export. Review of Economics and Statistics,2004,86(2):561-69
    [185]Baldwin, J.R., and W. Gu. Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Canadian Journal of Economics,2003, 36(3):634-57
    [186]Girma, S., D. Greenaway, R. Kneller. Does exporting increase productivity? A micro-econometric analysis of matched firms. Review of International Economics,2004,12:855-66
    [187]Blalock, Ga., J.P. Gertler. Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting. Journal of Development Economics,2004,75(2):397-416
    [188]Biesebroeck, V.J. Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Journal of International Economics,2005,67:373-91
    [189]包群,许和连,赖明勇.出口贸易如何促进经济增长?基于全要素生产率的实证研究.上海经济研究,2003,(3):3-10
    [190]姚洋,章林峰.中国本土企业出口竞争优势和技术变迁分析.世界经济,2008,(3):3-11
    [191]Kraay, A. Exports and economic performance:Evidence from a panel of Chinese enterprises, World Bank Mimeo,1999
    [192]张杰,李勇,刘志彪.出口与中国本土企业生产率:基于江苏制造业企业的实证分析.管理世界,2008,(11):50-64
    [193]吕冰洋,余丹林.中国梯度发展模式下经济效率的增进——基于空间视角的分析.中国社会科学,2009,(6)
    [194]Hu Albert G., Jefferson GH.,Qian Jinchang. R&D and Technology Transfer: Firm Level Evidence from Chinese Industry. Review of Economics and Statistics,2005,87(4):780-786
    [195]刘志彪,张杰.我国本土制造业企业出口决定因素的实证分析.经济研究,2009,(8):99-112
    [196]朱希伟,金祥荣,罗德明.国内市场分割与中国的出口贸易扩张.经济研究,2005,(12):68-76
    [197]平新乔.外国直接投资对中国企业的溢出效应分析:来自中国第一次全国经济普查数据的报告.世界经济,2007,(8)
    [198]Glass, A., Saggi K. International Technology Transfer and the Technology Gap. Journal of Development Economics,2001,55:369-398
    [199]Findlay, R. Relative Backwardness Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology:A Simple Dynamic Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1978,92:1-16
    [200]Wang, J., Blomstrom M. Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer:A Simple Model. European Economic Review,1992,36:137-155
    [201]Haskel, Jonathan, Sonia C. et al. Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms? NBER,8724,2002,8724
    [202]Romer, M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1999,18:71-102
    [203]Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive Capacity:A new perspective on learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990, (35):128-152
    [204]Kokko, A. Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers. Journal of Development Economics,1994,43:279-293
    [205]蒋殿春,张宇.经济转型与外商直接投资技术溢出效应.经济研究,2008,(7)
    [206]路江涌.外商直接投资对内资企业效率的影响和渠道.经济研究,2008,(6)
    [207]Barro, R., Sala-I-Martin, X. Economic growth. New York:McGraw Hill,1995
    [208]Hansen E. Bruce. Threshold Effect in Non-dynamic Panels:Estimation, Testing, and Inference. Journal of Econometrics,1999,73:345-368
    [209]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数.经济科学出版社,2006
    [210]张宇.FDI技术外溢的地区差异与吸收能力的门限特征—基于中国省际面板数据的门限回归分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(1)
    [211]Girma, S., David Greenaway, Katharine Wakelin. Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy,2001, 48:119-133
    [212]Girma S. Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI:A Threshold Regression Analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2005,67(3):281-306
    [213]Chong T. T-L. Consistency of change-point estimators when the number of change-points in structural change models is underspeci"ed. Working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong,1994
    [214]Bai J. Estimating multiple breaks one at a time. Econometric Theory,1997,(13): 315-352
    [215]Hansen E. Bruce. Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation. Econometrica, 2000,68(3):575-603
    [216]Blomstrom M., Wolff E. Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence in Mexico. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1994
    [217]谢建国.外商直接投资对中国的技术溢出:一个基于中国省区面板数据的研究.经济学季刊,2006,5(4)
    [218]Krammer Sorin M.S. Drivers of national innovation in transition:Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy,2009,38:845-860
    [219]Kose M. Ayhan, Prasad Eswar S., Terrones Marco E. Does openness to international financial flows raise productivity growth? Journal of International Money and Finance,2009,28:554-580
    [220]Spulber Daniel F. Innovation and international trade in technology. Journal of Economic Theory,2008,138:1-20
    [221]Almeida, R., Fernandes, A. M. Openness and Technological Innovations in Developing Countries:Evidence from Firm-Level Surveys. Washington D.C, World Bank, Policy Research,2007,3985
    [222]Salomon Robert, Jin Byungchae. Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by Exporting. Journal of International Business Studies,2008,39:132-150
    [223]Martin Woerter, Stephen Roperb. Openness and innovation-Home and export demand effects on manufacturing innovation:Panel data evidence for Ireland and Switzerland. Research Policy,2010,39:155-164
    [224]Harris M. N., Mark Rogers, Anthony Siouclis. Modeling Firm Innovation using Panel Probit Estimators. Applied Economics Letters,2003,10(11):683-686
    [225]聂冲,贾生华.离散选择模型的基本原理及其发展演进评介.数量经济技术经济研究,2005,(11)
    [226]郑江淮,高春亮,张宗庆等.国际制造业资本转移:动因,技术学习与政策导向.管理世界,2004,(11)
    [227]郭国峰.技术创新能力的影响因素介析—基于中部六省面板数据的实证研究.数量经济与技术经济研究,2007,(9)
    [228]Martin Srholec. A multilevel analysis of innovation in developing countries. TIK Working Paper on Innovation Studies,2008, (12):1-46
    [229]吴延兵.用DEA方法评测知识生产中的技术效率与技术进步.数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(7)
    [230]蒋殿春,夏良科.外商直接投资对中国高技术产业技术创新作用的经验分析.世界经济,2005,(8)
    [231]巫强,刘志彪.进口国质量管制条件下的出口国企业创新与产业升级.管理世界,2007,(2)
    [232]Xu B., E. P. Chiang, Trade. Patent s and International Technology Diffusion. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development,2005,14(1): 115-135
    [233]Kim, L. Imitation to Innovation:The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press,1997
    [234]Alfaro L., Chanda A., Kalemli-Ozcan S. FDI and Economic Growth:the Role of Local Financial Market. Journal of International Economics,2004,64:113-134
    [235]McCalman P. Reaping what you sow:an empirical analysis of international patent harmonization. Journal of international Economics,2002,55:161-186
    [236]Helpman, Elhanan. Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights. Econometria,1993,61(6):1247-1280
    [237]Glass, Amy, Kamal Saggi. Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Economics,2002,56(2):387-410
    [238]Lai, Edwin. International Intellectual Property Rights Protection and the Rate of Product Innovation. Journal of Development Economics,1998,55(1):133-153
    [239]Yang, Guifang, Keith E.Maskus. Intellectual Property Rights, Licensing, and Innovation in an Endogenous Product-Cycle Model. Journal of International Economics,2001,53(1):169-187
    [240]Shapiro, Carl. Navigating the Patent Thicket:Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting. Innovation Policy and the Economy,2001,(1):119-50
    [241]韩玉雄,李怀祖.知识产权保护对社会福利水平的影响.世界经济,2003,(9)
    [242]O'Donoghue, Ted, Josef Zweimuller. Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Economic Growth,2004,9(1):81-123
    [243]Park, Walter G. Intellectual Property Rights and International Innovation. In Keith Maskus (ed.) Frontiers of Economics and Globalization,, Handbook Series, Elsevier Science,2008a,(1)
    [244]Ginarte, Juan C., Walter G. Park. Determinants of Patent Rights:A Cross-National Study. Research Policy,1997,26(3):283-301
    [245]Varsakelis, Nikos C. The Impact of Patent Protection, Economy Openness and National Culture on R&D Investment:A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation. Research Policy,2001,30(7):1059-1068
    [246]Kanwar Sunil, Robert Evenson, Dose intellectual property protection spur technological change? Oxford Economic Papers,2003,55:235-264
    [247]Park, Walter G. Do Intellectual Property Rights Stimulate R&D and Productivity Growth? Evidence from Cross-national and Manufacturing Industries Data. In Jonathan Putnam (ed.), Intellectual Property and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Ottawa:Industry Canada,2005,(9):1-51
    [248]Branstetter, Lee, Raymond Fisman, C. et al. Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from US Firm-Level Panel Data. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006,121(1): 321-349
    [249]Allred, Brent and Walter G. Park. Patent Rights and Innovative Activities: Evidence from National and Firm-Level Data. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(6):878-900
    [250]周黎安,罗凯.企业规模与创新:来自中国省级水平的经验证据.经济学(季刊),2005,(3)
    [251]吴延兵.创新的决定因素-基于中国制造业的实证研究.世界经济文汇2008a,(2)
    [252]易先忠,张亚斌,刘智勇.自主创新,国外模仿与后发国知识产权保护.世界经济,2007,(3)
    [253]Schneider, Patricia H. International Trade, Economic Growth, and Intellectual Property Rights:A Panel Data Study of Developed and Developing Studies. Journal of Development Economics,2005,78(2):529-547
    [254]Eicher, Theo, Cecilia, Garcia-Penalosa. Endogenous strength of intellectual property rights:Implications for economic development and growth. European Economic Review,2008,52(2):237-258
    [255]Furukawa Yuichi. Intellectual property protection and innovation. Economics Letters,2010,109(2):99-101
    [256]Maskus, Keith E.& Ganslandt, Mattias. Intellectual Property Rights, Parallel Imports and Strategic Behavior. Working Paper Series 704, Research Institute of Industrial Economics,2007
    [257]Chen, Yongmin and Thitima Puttitanun. Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics,2005, 78(2):474-493
    [258]吴延兵.中国地区工业知识生产效率测算.财经研究,2008b,(10)
    [259]Furukawa Yuichi. Intellectual property protection and innovation. Economics Letters,2010,109(2):99-101
    [260]Li Haizheng, Barbra M. Fraumeni, Zhiqiang Liu, et al. Human Capital in China. NBER Working Paper No.15500, http://papers.nber.org/papers/w15500,2009
    [261]Lerner Josh. The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzle and Clues. American Economic Review,2009,99(2):343-348
    [262]庄子银.知识产权,市场结构,模仿和创新.经济研究,2009,(11)
    [263]潘士远.最优专利制度,技术进步方向与工资不平等.经济研究,2008,(1)
    [264]Caner, Mehmet and Hansen, Bruce E. Instrumental Variable Estimation Of A Threshold Model. Econometric Theory,2005,20(5):813-843
    [265]Kanwar Sunil, Robert Evenson. Dose intellectual property protection spurs technological change? Oxford Economic Papers,2003,55:235-264

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700