摘要
为了保证公民接受大学教育的公平性,推行商业助学贷款势在必行。通过本案,对商业助学贷款运行机制和體系中存在的问题进行了分析,对商业助学贷款进行机制和體系的完善与发展的相关策略提出了建议。主要内容如下。
1、针对商业助学贷款信用體系建设中存在的问题及原因,构建了商业助学贷款信用體系的基本框架。这一基本框架包括:完善商业助学贷款信用法律法规体系、建立商业助学贷款的信用资料技术支撑體系、建立大学生信用评价體系、建立政府信用市埸管理體系建立全社会诚信教育體系、建立商业助学贷款失信惩戒机制。
2、至于如何完善助学贷款信用體系,可以探取这些措施:加快助学贷款征信管理體系的建设,对助学贷款进行立法,建设助学贷款信用担保机构的有关法律,构建大学生个人信用评价體系,完善助学贷款资讯系统,设立商业助学贷款风险补偿机制,建立商业助学贷款「风险补偿专项资金」。
3、建立了大学生助学贷款信用評价體系,构建了商业助学贷款借贷人信用评价分析框架。依靠品德、能力、资本、担保品、环境这五个要素,对大学生个人信用进行评价。该信用評价體系的功能在于,通过商业助学贷款評价模型的设计,把政府职能部门和学校结合起来了,对大学生的学习表现、家庭收入情况、个人消费情况、是否恶意拖欠学费、经济社会活动方面、同学间认可的诚信度等各种信用活动都纳入評价范围。
4、建立了商业助学贷款失信(拖欠、逾期还款)与信贷风险控制机制。降低助学贷款拖欠的措施主要是:一是建立和完善各银行之间的资讯共用机制,将提高处罚违约者的机会;二是加大对违约者的处罚力度:三是延长还款期限、降低每期还款额。四是提高政府对贷款的贴息。五是提高借款学生信用意识,加快信用體系建立
5、为了完善商业助学贷款信用體系,需要借鉴境外商业助学贷款和信用担保的经验,结合实際情况,建议采取这些切实可行的对策。(1)对大学生加强诚信教育。(2)积极推动学生属地贷款。(3)设立和增大商业助学贷款风险基金,以分散银行的风险。(4)建立健全全国范围的个人征信系统。(5)尽快出台商业助学贷款的法律法规。(6)不断加强政府、银行、学校在商业助学贷款方面的合作。政府为商业助学贷款项目的实施提供良好的政策环境和进行环境学校、银行则负责具體工作的落实。
6、通过建立政策性信用担保机构为贫困大学生的贷款提供担保,从而建立起商业助学贷款信用担保體系。运用资讯经济学中的委託——代理理论,指出商业助学贷款信用担保體系中参与主体之间存在的委託——代理关系,通过分析委託——代理关系,建立委託方与代理方的激励和约束政策,从而确立了各参与者主體之间良好的运行关系。商业助学贷款信用担保體系最终的良好运行,可以调动起参与各方的积极性,可以使各方都获得相应的利益,可以促进商业助学贷款的可持续发展。
It is imperative to implement commercial student loan to ensure citizens'fairness of receiving university education. This research analyzes issues exist in operation mechanism & system of commercial student loan, and correspondently, proposes relevant strategies which would perfect and develop them. The major elements are set as follows:
1. In view of problems and reasons present in credit system construction of commercial student loan, the paper builds the basic framework of credit system, which includes consummation of credit laws and regulations for commercial student loan, establishment of credit data technical support system, creation of credit evaluation system for university students, construction of government credit market management system, building-up of whole social credit education system, constitution of dishonesty disciplinary mechanism for commercial student loan.
2. As for how to improve the student loan credit system, we can take these measures:speed up the construction of credit management system, promulgate legislations for student loan, construct related laws of student loan credit guarantee agencies, build personal credit evaluation system for university students, improve the information system, set up risk compensation mechanism, found risk compensation special funds.
3. The establishment of student loan credit evaluation system for college students, and the constitution of credit rating analysis framework for loan borrowers. The credit evaluation system assesses personal credit rely on moral character, capacity, capital, collateral, environment these five elements. By devising evaluation model of commercial student loan, this appraisal system combines government's function departments with schools, and brings various integrity activities such as academic performance of college students, family income, personal consumption, whether maliciously default fees, economic and social activities, students-recognized credit degree in the scope of evaluation.
4. The establishment of bad credit (arrears, late payment) and credit risk control for commercial student loan. Measures to reduce student loan default are mainly:First, constitute and perfect the information sharing mechanism among banks, which will increase penalty opportunities for those violations; Second, strengthen penalties for breach of contract; Third is to extend the repayment period, reduce each repayment amount; Four, elevate government's loan interest subsidies; Five is to increase students' awareness of loan credit and accelerate the establishment of credit system.
5. In order to improve the commercial student loan credit system, we need to draw on experience of cross-border commercial student loan and credit guarantee, combined with the actual condition. And practical solutions as follows are recommended. (1) strengthen university students' integrity education. (2) promote actively the student dependencies loan. (3) establish and increase risk funds of commercial student loan to diversify their risks. (4) establish nationwide personal credit information system. (5) promulgate laws and regulations of commercial student loan as soon as possible. (6) unceasingly enhance co-operations of the government, banks, schools in commercial student loan fields. The government provides good policy and operating environment for the implementation of commercial student loan, while schools & banks are responsible for specific tasks.
6. It's the building-up of policy-oriented credit guarantee institutions, which supply guarantees for the poor college students loan, that the credit guarantee system for commercial student loan has been established. By use of principal-agent theory in information economics, this study figures out that the principal-agent relations present between the body involved in credit guarantee system. By analyzing the principal-agent relations, it proposes incentives for the commissioning party and restriction policy for the agent-side, thus, setting up a good relationship between the main parties involved in the operation. The ultimate well-run of credit guarantee system could mobilize enthusiasms of the parties involved, could make access to the corresponding interests of all parties, could promote the sustainable development of commercial student loan.
引文
[1]G. A. Akerlof. The Market for 「 lemons 」:Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.84, No.3,1970. p488-500
[2]J. Barro Robert. The Loan Market, Collateral and Rates of Interest [J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. Vol.8, No.4,1976, p439-456
[3]J. E. Stiglitz, Andrew Weiss. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information[J].American Economic Review, Vol.71,1981, p393-410
[4]J. E. Stiglitz, Andrew Weiss. Asymmetric Information in Credit Markets and Its Implications for Macro-Economics [J]. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.44, No.4, 1992,p694-724
[5]J. E. Stiglitz, Andrew Weiss. Asymmetric Information in Credit Markets and Its Implications for Macro-Economics [J]. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.44, No.4, 1992,p694-724
[6]H. C. Wette. Collateral in Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information: Note[J]. The American Economic Review, Vol.73, No.3,1983, p442-445
[7]A. V. Thakor,Uk-Shee Chan. Collateral and Competitive Equilibria with Moral Hazard and Private Information[J]. The Journal of Finance, Vol.42, No.4,1987, p345-363
[8]A. V. Thakor, David Besanko. Collateral and Rationing:Sorting Equilibria in Monopolistic and Competitive Credit Markets[J]. International Economic Review, Vol.28, No.3,1987, p671-689
[9]A. W. A. Boot, A. V. Thakor, G. F. Udell. Secured Lending Default Risk: Equilibrium Analysis, Policy Implications and Empirical Results[J].The Economic Journal, Vol.101, No.4,1991, p458-471
[10]D. Hester Donald. Customer Relationship and Terms of Loans:Evidence from a Pilot Survey:Note [J] Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.11, No.3, 1979, p349-357
[11]N. Berger, G. F Allen. Udell. Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance[J].The Journal of Business, Vol.68, No.3,1995, p351-381
[12]A. W. A. Boot, A. V. Thakor. Moral Hazard and Secured Lending in an Infinitely Repeated Credit Market Game[J]. International Economic Review, Vol.35, No.4, 1994,p899-920
[13]李明峰.银行业对企业授信「信用评等表」财务比率预警有效性之实证分析 [D].“国立”中山大学财务管理学系研究所硕士论文,2001
[14]陈吉達.建立信用评级指标体系的几个理论问题.“国立”台北教育大学社会科教育学系硕士论文[D].2007年
[15]陈嘉霖.授信与风险[R].台北:财圑法人金融研训院,2006
[16]陈石进.银行授信管理[R].台北:财圑法人台湾金融研训院,2007
[17]张国训.台湾之银行业登陆初期的经营策略[J].台湾经济金融月刊,37(8):13-22,2001
[18]行政院金融监督管理委员会,http://www.fscey.gov.tw/
[19]中央银行,http://www.cbc.gov.tw/
[20]华南商业银行,http://www.hncb.com.tw/
[21]游金华.银行徵信机制对授信品质影响之研究—以台湾银行个案分行为例[D].朝阳科技大学财务金融系硕士论文,2002
[22]胡釗维,萧胜源.「黄金走廊」[J].商业周刊,1048:133-151,2007
[23]方至民、锺憲瑞.策略管理:建立企业永续竞争力[M].台北:前程文化事业有限公司,2006
[24]吴萬益、林清河.企业研究方法[M].台北:华泰文化事业有限公司,2000
[25]林穀合.「个别国家经贸投资动态与分析」[J]东亚经贸投资研究季刊,33:143-151,2006
[26]Catching the wave.Reinebach Adam.The Investment Dealers Digest:IDD.NewYork:Jul 1,1996.Vol.62.Iss.27:p12
[27]Darrell R Lewis. Equity Effects of Higher Education in Developing Countries:Access,Choice and Persistance[M].2005
[28]Albrecht,Douglas & Ziderman,Adrian.Deferred Cost Recovery for Higher Education:Student loan Programs in Developing Countries,The World Bank,2006,p.47-48
[29]G.Psacharopoulos.Return of Investment in Education:A Global Update[M].World Development. Vol.22,No.9.2006
[30]S. P. Robbins. Organizational behavior. (9th ed.). NJ:Prentice-Hall,2001
[31]S.,Taylor, F.,Rizvi,Lingard,B.& Henry,M. Educational policy and the politics of change. London:Routledge,2007
[32]Michael Mumper. Removing College Price Barriers[M].State University of New York,Albany,P.136,1996
[32]Maureen Wood hall.Financial Support for Students:Grants, Loans or Graduate Tax. Kogan Page,1989
[33]Arthur M Hauptman.Have Federal Loans contributed to Higher Tuition?,A SHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education,Pearson Custom Publishing,2001,P250-252.
[34]E.Stenback, R.Koskela.Is there a trade off between bank competition and financial fragility? Journal of Banking and Finance 24,1853-1873,2000
[35]Hong Shen& Wen li Li. A review of the student loans scheme in China,Bangkok:UNESCO Bang kok/IIEP,2003
[36]Albrecht,Douglas & Ziderman,Adrian.Deferred Cost Recovery for Higher Education:Student loan Programs in Developing Countries[M].The World Bank,2004.
[37]Qiang Fu,Michael La Courlittle,Kerry D.Vandell. Commerical Mortgage Prepayments Under Heterogeneous Prepayment Penalty Structures[J].Revision for Journal of Real Estate Research,2003,10(3):1-50
[38]Breitmoser,Yves. Infinitely Repeated Games of Reciprocal Player[J].Economic Letters,2005,12(89):323-327
[39JIFC and Citibank team up to offer student loans in India.Euroweek London:Mar 2,2001.Iss.692:p59
[40]The Federal Family Education Loan Program.http://www.usafunds.org/about_usa_funds/student_loan_program/FFE LP/index.htm,2004(8),25
[41]The Federal Family Education Loan Program.http://www.usafunds.org/about_usa_fumds/student_loan_program/FFE LP/index.htm,2004(8),25
[42]www.ato.gov.au
[43]http://www.sina.com.cn.2005-02-23
[44]Albrecht. D.& Ziderman, A., Deferred Cost Recovery for Higher Education: Student Loan Programs in Develoning Countries. Washington, D.C.:The world bank.2007
[45]Minicozzi,Alexandra,The short term effect of educational debt on job decisions[J]. Economics of Education Review Volume:24,Issue:4,August,2005,pp.417-430.
[46]Andolfatto,David;Gervais,Martin,Human capital investment and debt constraints [J]. Review of Economic Dynamics Volume:9,Issue:1,January,2006,pp.52-67.
[47]Varian,Hal R. Intermediate microeconomics:a modern approach[M].New York:W.W. Norton,2006.2nd ed.
[48]Robert S. Pindyck,Daniel L. Rubinfeld; Microeconomics[M].The World Bank,2007.
[49]人力资本:特别是关于教育的理论与经验分析[M].香港:天马图书出版公司,2007
[50]Koskela, E, Stenback, R,2000, Is there a trade off between bank competition and financial fragility [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance 24,1853-1873
[51]Albrecht, Douglas & Ziderman, Adrian, Deferred Cost Recovery for Higher Education:Student loan Programs in Developing Countries[M].The World Bank,1991
[52]Cripps,Martin W,Dekel,Eddie,Pesendorfer,Wolfgang. Reputation with equal discounting in repeated games with strictly conflicting interests[J]Journal of EconomicTheory,2005,4(121):259-272.
[53]Schwartz,S,Finnie,R,Student loans in Canada:an analysis of borrowing and repayment[J]. Economics of Education Review,Volume:21,Issue:5,October,2007,pp.497-512.
[54]Christou,Costas; Haliassos,Michael.,How do students finance human capital accumulation?:The choice between borrowing and work[J].Journal of Policy Modeling Volume:28,Issue:1,January,2006,pp.39-51
[55]Celentani,M,and W. Pesendorder. Reputation in Dynamic Games [J]. Journal of Economic Theory.1996,(70):109-132
[56]Bohnet,Iris,Huck,Steffen.Repetition and Reputation:Implications for Trust and Trust worthiness When Institutions Change[J].American Economic Review,2004,5(94):362-366
[57]Hong Shen.The most urgent problem in student loan scheme in China:Repayment.Harvard University:Harvard China Review,2004.2
[58]葉英俊,纪榮年译.企业评等与银行授信.台北:财圑法人台湾金融研训院,1998
[59]银行对企业授信规范编撰委员会.银行对企业授信规范(第9版).台北:财圑法人金融人员研究训练中心,1980
[60]蔡淑芳.绿色供应商之評選模式研究—以IC封装业为例.“国立”中山大学企业管理学系硕士在职专班论文,2005
[61]鄧振源,曾国雄.「层级分析法(AHP)的内涵特性与应用(下)」,中国统计学报,27(7):5-22,1989
[62]鄧振源,曾国雄.「层级分析法(AHP)的内涵特性与应用(上)」.中国统计学报,27(6):5-22,1989
[63]賴旺根.一军策略.台北:商周编辑顾问有限公司,2008
[64]罗際棠.银行授信与经营.台北:三民书局,1995
[65]蘇廣世.商业银行对法人授信规划之探讨.东吴大学會计学系硕士论文,2004
[66]T. L.Saaty.The Analytic Hierarchy Process:Planning, Priority, Resourse Allocation, New York:McGraw-Hill,1980
[67]T. L.Saaty,& Vargas, L. G. The Logic of Priorities Applications in Business, Energy, Health,and Transportation. Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff; Hingham, Mass: Distributors for North America,1982
[68]Philippe, Jorion,陈胜源译.金融风险管理.台北:寰宇出版股份有限公司,2006
[69]经济部国際贸易局http://www.trade.gov.tw/
[70]经济部投资业务处http://www.dois.moea.gov.tw/
[71]L.Hurwiez.On Informationally Decentralized System in R. Radner and C. B. McGuire(eds.),Decision and Organization, Volume in Honor of J. Marshek, Amsterdam:North-Holland Publishing Co.,1972, pp.297-336
[72]Eric Rasmusen, Games and Information (2nd Edition).Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1994:129-146
[73]S.,Taylor, F.,Rizvi, B.,Lingard & M.,Henry (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. London:Routledge
[74]Qiang Fu,Michael La Cour_little, Kerry D.Vandell. Commerical Mortgage Prepayments Under Heterogeneous Prepayment Penalty Structures [J]. Revision for Journal of Real Estate Research,2003,10(3):1-50
[75]Ministry of Planning and Investment-Vietnam,http://www.mpi.gov.vn/defauit.aspx?Lang=2
[76]Qiang Fu,Michael La Cour_little, KerryD.Vandell. Commerical Mortgage Prepayments Under Heterogeneous Prepayment Penalty Structures [J]. Revision for Journal of Real Estate Research,2003,10(3):1-50.
[77]Student Loan Securitization Market Poised for Growth After Strong 94. STEVE KLINKERMAN. American Banker(pre-1997 Fulltext).New York:Jan 20,1995.Vol.l60.Iss.13:p6
[78]Cripps, Martin W, Dekel, Eddie, Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. Reputation with equal discounting in repeated games with strictly conflicting interests[J].Journal of EconomicTheory,2005,4(121):259-272
[79]Celentani,M,and W. Pesendorder. Reputation in Dynamic Games[J].Journal of Economic Theory.1996, (70):109-132
[80]Bohnet,Iris,Huck, Steffen. Repetition and Reputation:Implications for Trust and Trustworthiness When Institutions Change[J].American Economic Review, 2004,5(94):362-366
[81]台湾经济研究院(?)hittp://www.tier.org.tw/
[82]Student loan tool rolled out.Asset Sales Report.09/08/97.Vol.11.Issue.34:p8
[83]Student Loan Securitization Is Planned by Society Corp.Liebowitz Michael.
The Investment Dealers,Digest:IDD.New York:Dec 21,1992.Vol.58.Iss.51:p34
[84]Finance:capital:Society to sell student-loan securities.Siegel David.American Banker.NewYork:Dec 23,1992:p16
[85]杨朝祥.大学学费调涨的成因与对策.台湾国家政策论壇季刊,冬季號:174-180,2003
[86]柯懿雯.台湾与澳洲就学贷款制度之比较研究.暨南大学比较教育系硕士论文,2004
[87]林彦志.我国大学学雜费政策规划之研究.嘉羲大学国民教育研究所硕士论文,2003
[88]胡心慈.台湾就学贷款业务三赢決策之研究.淡江大学管理科学研究所硕士论文,2003
[89]陈莲樱.台湾地區大学学费制定及相关因素之研究.暨南大学教育政策与行政学研究所硕士论文,2005
[90]杨世璋.我国大学实施共同助学措施及清寒奖助之研究.嘉羲大学国民教育研究所硕士论文,2007
[91]马国棟.个人高等教育成本分担---贷款与工讀的运用.暨南大学教育政策与行政学研究所硕士论文,2008
[92]洪薇茜.家庭背景、学校类型与就学贷款因果模式之建立与验证.“国立”屏東教育大学教育学系硕士论文,2008
[93]黄翊智.高等教育成本分担理论对台湾学生就学贷款制度關聯性之研究.台南大学教育经营与管理研究所硕士论文,2005
[94]台湾银行.台湾银行就学贷款入口网https://sloan.bot.com.tw/sloan/sloanlogin,do,2008
[95]教育部.助学圆夢网https://helpdreams.moe.edu.tw/home,2008
[96]教育部统计处.重要教育统计资讯https://140.111.34.54/statistics/content.aspx,2008
[97]杨景堯.我国大学学生助学贷款之研究.台湾师大教育研究所硕士论文,1983
[98]陈晓红.中小企业融资创新与信用担保[M].中国人民出版社,2003
[99]陈晓红.中小企业融资与成长,经济科学出版社,2007
[100]陈晓红,刘剑.我国中小企业融资结構与融资方式演进研究[J].中国軟科学,2003,12:P.61-P.67
[101]陈晓红,刘剑.不同成长阶段下中小企业融资方式选择研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,1
[102]任淮秀,孙剑平.从信用担保制度看中国企业债券市埸的发展[J].经济理论与经济管理,2004,1:PP.15-20
[103]洪佩民.藏在富裕社会下的教育问题,从念不起大学的孩子谈起,台湾大学新闻研究所2004年
[104]沈珊珊.贫家与教育关系之探讨;兼论台湾相关之教育政策,教育与发展研究期刊2(3),35-62
[105]林文蘭.优惠或汙名?台湾教育补助政策的社会分类效应。教育与社会研究,11,107-152,2006
[106]江芳盛.澳洲教育制度。载与王家通(主编)各国教育制度。台北师大书院
[107]张紫庭.台湾大学就学贷款制度执行之研究—以台湾师范大学为例。台湾师大政治学研究所硕士2004
[108]施博惠.台北市高级中等学校申辦就学贷款学生辦理就学贷款之研究。台北科技大学技术与职业教育研究所2003