我国国有企业并购动因与并购绩效研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,国有企业的并购活动越来越活跃,一来是为了适应国家调整国民经济结构的战略影响,二来是全球金融危机给我国国有企业带来了前所未有的扩张良机。我国国有企业的并购,有成功的案例,也有失败的教训。在这样的背景下,结合企业并购的相关理论来探讨我国国有企业并购的特殊性,将为企业迎接新一轮的并购活动提供有效的理论和方法支持。本文从以下几个方面展开对国有企业并购问题的研究。
     (1)国有企业在实现企业价值增值的同时,还承担着更多的社会责任和国家责任,因此,其并购动因与一般并购活动相比具有一定的特性。本文运用效率理论、委托代理理论和并购浪潮理论,对我国国有企业并购动因和一般企业并购动因的相同点和不同点展开了分析,系统提出了4类12个方面的国有企业并购动因,并对国有企业的并购模式进行了分析。
     (2)并购绩效的考核是对国有企业并购活动进行评价的重要内容,也可以为以后的并购活动提供参考信息。本文基于国有企业并购活动绩效横向比较的视角,从财务和非财务两个指标维度,建立了全面的国有企业并购活动绩效评价指标体系,并进行了实证研究。
     (3)研究并购绩效的影响因素对未来的并购活动具有很高的参考价值。本文基于相关理论对国有企业并购与一般并购绩效影响因素的相同点及特性进行了理论分析,在此基础上提出了影响国有企业并购绩效的5个方面共计21个关键因素,并对其中的并购策略性因素对并购绩效的影响进行了实证研究。
     (4)对我国四个重要行业的国有企业并购现状与相关案例进行了分析,在此基础上,从政府在国企并购中的定位、并购前的准备、并购方案的制定、并购后的整合四个方面提出了我国国有企业开展并购活动的建议。
In recent years, state-owned enterprises merge&acquisitions (M&A) are becoming more and more active. One of the two main reasons is the strategic influence of economic structure adjusting which is being implemented by Chinese government, the other is that the globally financial crisis has brought about an unprecedented opportunity for those state-owned enterprise which are willing to expand. Some state-owned enterprises successfully executed M&A, but there are still some failed. Under this background, exploring the particularity of state-owned enterprises M&A on the basis of M&A theories will provide state-owned enterprises effectively theoretical and methodological support in the future M&A activities. This doctoral dissertation studies the M&A issues of state-owned enterprises from the following aspects:
     (1) Not only should the state-owned enterprises make value added, but also assume much social responsibilities, the M&A motivation of state-owned enterprises is not totally the same as that of other enterprises. Base on the relative thoeries, the similarities and the differiences of the M&A motivation between state-owned enterprises and general analyzed,12kinds of motivation in four aspects are sumed up. M&A patterns of state-owned enterprises are explored as well.
     (2) M&A performance analysis is the most important aspect for evaluating the M&A activities of state-owned cnterprises. It could provide useful information for the following M&A activities as well. From the visual angle of performance horizontal comparision, this doctoral disertation constructs an overall indicator system for state-owned enterprises' M&A performance evaluation based on both financial and non-financial indicators. An empirical study is used afterwards to prove the feasibility of this system.
     (3) To sum up the key factors which would affect the M&A performance is very valuable. This doctoral disertation analyze the similarities and the differiences between state-owned enterprises M&A and general M&A based on relative theories. And then the key affecting factors of the state-owned enterprises M&A performance is sumed up, which include21items in5aspects. An empirical study is also used to probe into the relationship of performance and the key affecting factors in tactical aspect.
     (4) M&A present situations and cases in four important industries in China are analyzed. Then suggestions about state-owned enterprises M&A are put forward in four aspects, which are positioning of the government, preparations before M&A activity, development of the M&A scheme, and the integration after M&A activity.
引文
[1]Agrawa, A., J. F. Jaffe, "The post-merger performance puzzle", Advances in mergers and acquisitions,2000.
    [2]Agrawa, A., J. Jaffe and G. Mandelker, "The post-merger performance of acquiring firms:are examination of an anomaly", Journal of Finance,1992,47(4).
    [3]AlanJ.Auerbaeh, Mergers and Acquisitions, The University of Chicago Press, 1988.
    [4]Andrade, G., M. Mitchell and E. Stafford, "New evidence and perspectives on mergers", Journal of Economic Perspectives,2001,15(2).
    [5]Bagnol, M., and B. Lipman:"Successful takeovers without exclusion", Review of FinancialStudies,1988.
    [6]Baumol W. J, The Stock Market and Economic Efficiency, New York:Fordham University Press,1965
    [7]Bebchuk, L.A., "The Pressure to Tender:An Analysis and a Proposed Remedy".in John C.Coffee, Louis Lowenstein and Susan Rose-Ackerman (eds.) Knights, Raiders, and Targets, OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford,1988.
    [8]Berkovitch, E. and M. P. Narayanan, "Motives for takeovers:an empirical investigation", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,28(3).
    [9]Berkovitch, Elazar, and M. P. Narayanan, "Motives for Takeovers:An Empirical Investigation", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993.
    [10]Berry J W, Kim U, Minde T & Mok D., "Comparative Studies in Acculturative Stress", International Migration Review,1987(21).
    [11]Birkinshaw, Bresman, Hakanson, Managnig the Post-acquisition Integration Pocress:How the Human Integration and Task Integration Proeess Interact to Foster Value Creation, Journal of Managmenet Studies,2000,37(3):395-425.
    [12]Bradley M., Anand Desai, and E. Han Kim, Specialized Resources and Competition in the Market for Corporate Control, University of Michigan, September 1982.
    [13]Bradley M., Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division Between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms, Journal of Financial Economics,1988.
    [14]Brunner J.2002, Making story:law, literature and life, Harvard University press.
    [15]Buono A F and Bowditch J L., The Human Side of Mergers and Acquisitions: Managing Collisions Between People, Cultures and Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey Bass,1989.
    [16]Burkart, M., "Initial shareholders and overbidding in takeover contests",Journal of Finance,1995,50(5).
    [17]Burkart, M., D. Gromb and F. Panunz, "Why higher takeover premium protect minority shareholders", Journal of Political Economy,1998,106(1).
    [18]Chowdhry, B. and N. Jegadeesh, "Pre-tender offer share acquisition strategy in takeovers", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1994.
    [19]Chowdhry, B. and V. Nanda, "The strategic role of debt in takeover contests" Journal of Finance,1993,48(2).
    [20]Cornell Bradford and Alan Shapiro, Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance, Financial Management, spring 1987.
    [21]Dodd, P. and R. Ruback, "Tender offers and stockholder returns:an empirical analysis", Journal of Financial Economics,1977,5(3).
    [22]Eckbo, B.E., "Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth", Journal of Financial Economics,1983,11(14).
    [23]Fama, E. F., "Agency problems and the Theory of the Firm", Journal of Political Economy,1980.88(2).
    [24]Ferguson, M. F., "Ownership structure, potential competition, and the free-rider problem intender offers'", Journal of Law, Economics,& Organization,1994, 10(1).
    [25]Fishman, M. J, "Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions", Journal of Finance,1989,44(1).
    [26]Fishman, M. J., "A theory of pre-emptive takeover bidding", Rand Journal of Economics,1988,19(1).
    [27]Frank T Paine, Daniel J Power, "Merger Strategy:An Examination of Drucker's Five Rules for Successful Acquisitions", Strategic Management Journal,1984, 5(2).
    [28]Giammarino, R.M., R. L. Heinke, "A model of dynamic takeover behavior" Journal of Finance,1986,41(2).
    [29]Gort, M.. "An economic disturbance theory of mergers", Quarterly Journal of Economics,1969,83(4).
    [30]Hansen, R. G., A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions, Journal of Business,1987,60(1).
    [31]Hay and Morris, Industrial Economics and Organization:Theory and Evidence, New York:Oxford University Press,1991.
    [32]Healy, P. J., K. G. Palepu, R. S.Ruback, "Does corporate performance improve after Mergers", Journal of Financial Economics,1992.
    [33]Hirshleifer, D. and S.Titman, "Share tendering strategies and the success of hostile takeover bids", Journal of Political Economy,1990.
    [34]Holmstr B. R. and S. N. Kaplan, "Corporate governance and merger activity in the United States:Making sense of the 1980s and 1990s", Journal of Economic Perspectives,2001.
    [35]Hubbard, R. G. and D. Palia, "A reexamination of the conglomerate merger wave in the 1960s:an internal capital markets view", Journal of Finance,1999.
    [36]James A. Fairburn, John A Kay, Mergers & Merger Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford,1989, P38,151.
    [37]Jarrel,1 G., A. Poulsen, "The returns to acquiring firms in tender offers:evidence from three decades", Financial Management,1989,18(3).
    [38]Jarrell G. A., J. A. Brickley and J. M. Netter, "The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980", Journal of Economic Perspectives,2, Winter 1988, P51
    [39]Jemes C. Horne& John M. Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Finance Management Published by Prentice-Hall, Inc.,1998.
    [40]Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback, "The market for corporate control the scientific evidence", Journal of Financial Economics,1983.
    [41]Jensen, M. C. and W. Meckling,"Theory of the firm:managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economics,1976.
    [42]Jensen, M.C and R. S. Ruback, "the market for corporate control:The scientific evidence". Journal of Financial Economics,1983, (11).
    [43]Keith D. Brouthers, Paul van Bastenburg and Joran Van Den Yen, If Most Mergers Fail, Why Are They so Popular? Long Range Planning,1998,31.
    [44]Klein Benjamin and K. B. Leffler, "The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance", Journal of Political Economy, August 1981.
    [45]Lambrecht, B.M., "The timing and terms of mergers motivated by economies of scale", Journal of Financial Economics,2004.
    [46]Lamnbrecht, B.M. and S. C. Myers, "A theory of takeovers and disinvestment" Journal of Finance,2007,62(2).
    [47]Lang, L.H. P., R.M. Stulz and R.A.Walkling, "A test of the free cash flow hypothesis:the case of bidder returns", Journal of Finance Economics,1991, 29(2).
    [48]Larsson and Rikard, The Hand Shake Between Invisible and Visible Hands, Paper Presented at Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Francisco
    [49]Leland, H., "Financial synergies and the optimal scope of the firm:implications for mergers, spinoffs, and structured finance", Journal of Finance,2007,62(2).
    [50]Levin, Horizontal Mergers, "The 50-percent Benchmark", American Economic Review,1990.
    [51]Lewellen W.G.,& B. Huntsman, "Managerial Pay and Corporate Performance" American Economic Review,60, September 1970.
    [52]Lewellen, W. G., C. Loderer and A. Rosenfeld, "Merger decisions and executive stockownership in acquiring firms", Journal of Accounting and Economics,1985, 7(1-3).
    [53]Loughran, T. and A.Vijh, "Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisition?" Journal of Finance,1997.
    [54]Lynch, H. H., Financial Performance of Conglomerates, Boston, MA:Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration,1971.
    [55]Malezadeh Ali R, Nahavandi Afsaneh, "Making Merges Work by Managing Cultures", Journal of Business Strategy 1990,11 (3).
    [56]Manne, H.G., "Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control", Journal of political Economy,73, April 1965.
    [57]Markham, J. W., Conglomerate Enterprises and Public Policy, Boston, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration,1973.
    [58]Martine Cardel Gertsen, Anne-Marie Soderberg, Jens ErikTorp. Culture Dimensions of International Mergers and Acquisitions, Berlin:Walter de Gruyter Publishers,1998.
    [59]Martynova, M., S. Oosting and L. Renneboog,2006:"The long-term operating performance of European mergers and acquisitions", Working paper available on SSRN.
    [60]Max M Habeck, Fritz Kroger, Michael R Tram. After Merger:Seven Strategies for Successful Post-Merger Integration, London:Preentence Hall,2000.
    [61]Mcafee and Williams, "Horizontal Mergers and Antitrust Policy", the Journal of Industrial Economics,1992.
    [62]Mitchel, M. and J.H. Mulherin, "The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity", Journal of Financial Economics,1996.
    [63]Morellec, E. and A. Zhdanov, "The dynamics of mergers and acquisitions", Journal of Financial Economics,2005.
    [64]Morellec, E. and A. Zhdanov,2006, "Financing and takeovers", working paper available on SSRN.
    [65]Mueller D.C., A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers, Quarterly Journal of Economics,1969.
    [66]Mueller, H. and F. Panunz, "Tender Offers and Leverage", Quarterly Journal of Economics,2004,119(4).
    [67]Muller, D. and M. Sirower, "The cause of mergers:tests based on the gains to acquiring firms' shareholders and the size of premium", Managerial and Decision Economics,2003.
    [68]Mullin, G.L., J.L. Mullin and W. P.Mullin, "The competitive effects of mergers: stock market evidence from the U. S. steel discussion suit", Rand Journal of Economics,1995,26(2).
    [69]N.Hubbard and P. D. Vivian, if you can't integrate, don't merge.addressing the human factor, the Focus online,www.ezifacus.com.
    [70]Nelson. R. L., Merger movements in American industry 1895-1956, The Univ. Pr., 1959.
    [71]P C Haspeslagh, D.Bjemison, "Acquisition Integration:Creating the Atmosphere for Value Creation", The Management of Corporate Acquisition, The Maemillan Press LTD.1994.
    [72]Parrino, J.D. and R. S. Harris, "Takeovers, management replacement and post-acquisition operating performance:some evidence from the 1980s", Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,1999.
    [73]Prescott E. and M. Visscher, "Organization Capital", Journal of Political Economy, June 1980.
    [74]Rau, R. P. and T. Vermaelen, "Glamour, Value and the Post-acquisition Performance of Acquiring Firms", Journal of Financial Economics,1998,49(2).
    [75]Rhodes-Kroph, M. and S. Viswanathan, "Market valuation and merger waves", Journal of Finance,2004.
    [76]Rhodes-Kroph, M., D. T. Robinson and S. Viswanathan, "Valuation waves and mergeractivity:the empirical evidence", Journal of Financial Economic,2005, 77,561-603.
    [77]Robert F. Burner,2001, Does M & A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker, University of Virginia working paper.
    [78]Robert J. Borgnese and Paul F. Borgese,2001, M&A from planning to integration, McGraw-Hill.
    [79]Roll R., "The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers", Journal of Business, 1986,59(2).
    [80]Rosen Sherwin, Learning by Experience as Joint Production, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 1972.
    [81]Salant, Switzer, Reynolds, "Losses from Horizontal Mergers:The Effect of Change in Industry Structure on Cournot-nash Equilibrium", Quarterly Economics, 1983,98.
    [82]Schweiger D.M., Executive Actions for Managing Human Resource before and After Acquisition, Academy of Management Executive,1990.
    [83]Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny. Value Maximization and the Acquisition Process, Journal of Economic Perspectives,1988,25.
    [84]Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, "Managerial entrenchment:the case of manager-specific investments", Journal of Financial Economics,1989.
    [85]Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, "Stock market driven acquisitions", Journal of Financial Economics,2003.
    [86]Shleifer, A., and R.Vishny, "Large shareholders and corporate control", Journal of Financial Economics,1986.
    [87]Stephanie S Robbins, Antonis C Stylianou, "Post-merger systems integration:the impact on IS capabilities", Information & Management,1999(36).
    [88]Sudarsanam, "The essence of mergers and acquisitions", Prentice Hall Europe, 1995(5).
    [89]Temporary National Economic Committee, Investigation of Economic Power Concentration, Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office,1941,4.
    [90]Toxvaerd, F.,2004, "Strategic merger waves:a theory of musical chairs", Working paper availableon SSRN.
    [91]U.S. Congress Senate Anti-trust and Monopoly Subcommittee, Economic Concentration, Washington:government printing office,1970.
    [92]W. Lewellen, C. Loderer, K. Martin, G. Blum, "Executive Compensation and the Performance of the Firm", Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol 13,1992.
    [93]Weston, J. F., "The Nature and Significance of Conglomerate Firms", St, John's Law Review Special Edition,44, Spring 1970.
    [94]Weston, J. F., M. L. Mitchell and J. H. Mulherin,2004, Takeovers, restructuring and corporate governance, Pearson Prentice-Hall, Uper Saddle River, New Jersey.
    [95]Williamson O.E., the Economic Institutions of Capitalism, NY: the Free Press, 1985.
    [96]Williamson. E., Corporate Control and Business Behavior, Englewood cliffs, Prentice-Hall,1970.
    [97]Williamson.O. E., The Mechanisms of Governance, NY:Oxford U. Press,1996.
    [98]You Victor, Richard Caves, Michael Smith, and James Henry, Mergers and Bidders' Wealth:Managerial and Strategic Factors, the Economics of Strategic Planning, Lacy Glenn Thomas, Ⅲ, ed., L, exington, MA:Lexington Books, 1986.
    [99]曾理.国有企业并购重组模式选择[J].合作经济与科技,2011年3月.
    [100]常文芳.中国企业跨国并购中的财务风险管理研究[D].兰州理工大学硕士学位论文,2009年4月.
    [101]陈凡.当代国际银行业并购与我国银行业战略选择研究[D].辽宁大学博士学位论文,2008年5月.
    [102]陈桂华.外资并购我国上市公司绩效分析及对策建议[J].经济问题,2010年第8期:56-58.
    [103]陈国平、景奉杰.我国企业并购重组的文化整合问题研究[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005年第11期.
    [104]陈慧琴.中国上市公司资产重组问题研究[M].上海财经大学出版社,2005年.
    [105]陈建梁、袁宏泉.国内外关于并购成败的因素分析[J].经济问题探索,2004年第7期.
    [106]陈晓、陈小悦、刘钊.A股盈余报告的有用性研究[J].经济研究,1999年第5期.
    [107]陈小洪、李兆熙主编.中国企业并购重组[M].中国发展出版社,2009年.
    [108]陈小悦、孙爱军CAPM在中国股市的有效性检验[J].北京大学学报,2000年第4期.
    [109]陈信元,张田余.兼并收购中目标公司定价问题的探讨[J].南开管理评论,1999(3):4-8.
    [110]陈信元、张田余.资产重组的市场效应.1997年沪市资产重组实证分析[J].经济研究,1999年第9期.
    [111]程兆谦.购并中价值创造的三个基本问题[J].经济管理,2001年第18期.
    [112]崔保军.关于企业并购成败判定标准的思考[J].华东经济管理,2008年第12期.
    [113]戴丽萍、何庆明.企业组织结构演变研究[J].经济问题探索,2004年第9期.
    [114]戴维·哈丁、萨姆·洛维特,胡中祥、胡枫译.兼并之道.决定公司成败的四个关键决策[M].商务印书馆,2006年
    [115]戴小凤、杨军和张清海.中国股票市场的弱式有效性检验.基于单位根方法[J].系统工程,2005年第11期.
    [116]戴永秀.国有企业并购后的组织结构整合研究[D].南昌大学硕士学位论文,2008年.
    [117]邓欣.国有企业并购重组及其策略分析[J].财会通讯,2010年第6期.
    [118]杜群阳、徐臻.中国企业海外并购的绩效与风险.评价模型与实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2010年第9期.
    [119]范黎波、王肃.基于组织学习视角的跨国公司成长战略.基于北一并购德国科堡的案例分析[J].财贸经济,2011年第8期.
    [120]冯根福、吴林江.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].经济研究2001(1):54-61.
    [121]高静美、郭劲光.引致购并失败的因素解析.来自一个新视角的考察[J].重庆工商大学学报,2006年第2期.
    [122]古继宝、张英.中国企业跨国并购交易成败的影响因素[J].经济管理,2006年第19期.
    [123]顾露露,Robert Reed中国企业海外并购失败了吗?[J].经济研究.2011,07:20-25
    [124]管述学、庄宇.基于核心能力的企业并购整合模型研究[J].软科学,2005年第1期.
    [125]郭凯,刘海风.基于DEA的我国煤炭上市公司并购绩效研究[J].中国煤炭,2010年第6期:37-40
    [126]郭睿等.中国股票市场效率的实证检验[J].税务与经济,2004年第3期.
    [127]郭妍.我国银行海外并购绩效及其影响因素的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2010,11:18-22
    [128]韩东京.公司治理与并购模式的选择研究[J].财会研究,2010年第21期.
    [129]何彦宏.试论推进国有企业并购的对策[J].现代审计,2008年3月.
    [130]黄海燕,李月娥.上市公司并购重组绩效及其影响因素分析—来自矿产资源类上市公司的实证研究[J].财会通讯,2009年第5期:15-18
    [131]黄瑾、王基建.基于多因素层次分析的企业并购财务风险评估[J].国外建材科技,2005年第3期.
    [132]黄珏.中国国有企业集团资本运营模式及案例分析[J].经济研究导刊,2010年第 27期:30.
    [133]黄凌灵.关于企业并购财务风险问题的探讨[J].会计之友,2010年第2期.
    [134]黄速建等.并购后整合:企业并购成败的关键因素[J].经济管理,2003年第15期.
    [135]黄泰岩.不整合就别并购[J].经济理论与经济管理,2003年第2期.
    [136]黄旭,史锐.制造业上市公司并购:绩效分析与政策建议[J].财经科学,2007年第11期:41-47
    [137]姜黎辉、张朋柱.中国企业并购国外研发型公司的动因与风险——基于OLI扩展模型的分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004年第1期.
    [138]冷薇薇,陈向明.上市公司并购融资决策与绩效评价探析[J].财政研究,2009年第12期:67-69
    [139]黎正忠.并购企业文化整合的影响因素及策略研究[D].暨南大学博士学位论文,2006年.
    [140]李建兵.试论国有企业并购重组后的文化整合[J].河北省社会主义学院学报,2009年第1期.
    [141]李青原.公司并购协同效应.影响成本与资产专用性[D].武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005年.
    [142]李荣融.关于国有企业改革的几个问题[J].宏观经济研究,2007年第7期.
    [143]李善民,曾昭灶,王彩萍等.上市公司并购绩效及其影响因素研究[J].世界经济,2004年第9期:61-67
    [144]李善民,刘永新.并购整合对并购公司绩效的影响—基于中国液化气行业的研究[J].南开管理评论,2009年第4期:154-160
    [145]李尚民、朱涛.中国上市公司并购的长期绩效[J];中山大学学报2005(5):80-86.
    [146]李心丹,朱洪亮,张兵,等.基于DEA的上市公司并购效率研究[J].经济研究[J].2003(10):33-35
    [147]李艳梅.中国资源型企业海外并购风险管理研究[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2010年6月.
    [148]李育红.公司治理结构对内部控制有效性的影响[J].中国注册会计师,2011年第3期.
    [149]李云江.企业集团并购后整合研究.基于公司治理的视角[D].南昌大学硕士学位论文,2008年6月.
    [150]李哲,何佳.国有上市公司的上市模式、并购类型与绩效[J].世界经济,2007年第9期:64-73
    [151]李政.石油企业并购的财务风险及应对措施[J].当代经济,2011年第8期.
    [152]林汉川等主编,中国企业国际化经营研究报告2010[M].中国商务出版社,2010 年11月
    [153]林季红.汽车业跨国公司全球竞争态势[J].南开管理评论,2004年第4期:51-57
    [154]林秋桂.简析国有企业并购整合模式对资本运作的影响[J].中国总会计师,2010年8月总第85期.
    [155]林源、张习宁.产权交易、制度完善与企业并购.兼论促进国有企业并购的机制设计[J].改革与战略,2009年第8期.
    [156]刘亮.我国上市公司并购价值创造的实证研究[J].商业研究2005(24).30-33.
    [157]刘文炳,张颖,张金鑫.并购战略绩效评价研究—基于联想并购工BMPC业务的案例分析[J].生产力研究,2009年第14期:92-94
    [158]刘笑萍,黄晓筱,郭红玉.产业周期、并购类型与并购绩效的实证研究[J].金融研究,2009年第3期:135-153
    [159]刘新峰.企业并购中的财务风险评价与控制研究[D].西南财经大学硕士学位论文,2007年11月.
    [160]刘智泓.银行海外并购动机的探讨——以中国工商银行东亚并购动机为例[J].发展研究,2011年第4期.
    [161]陆桂贤.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究——基于EVA模型[J].审计与经济研究,2012,03:21-26.
    [162]陆瑶,闫聪,朱玉杰.对外跨国并购能否为中国企业创造价值?[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2011,08:16-21.
    [163]满慧.我国企业并购的理论与实证研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2007年.
    [164]倪奕雯.中国企业海外并购研究——TCL集团海外并购案例分析[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2006年12月.
    [165]欧璞.中国企业海外并购的现状、问题及对策研究[D].华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2008年9月.
    [166]彭迪,国有企业并购过程中的财务风险及其防范[D].兰州理工大学硕士学位论文,2009年.
    [167]钱欢,上市公司并购失败成因研究[J].江西金融职工大学学报,2009年第2期
    [168]屈颖爽、刘志强、陈守东.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].商场现代化,2008(5).81.
    [169]阮伦祥.2000-2007年中国企业跨国并购案例的研究[D].华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2008年5月.
    [170]宋希亮、张秋生、初宜红.我国上市公司换股并购绩效的实证研究[J].中国工业经济2008(7):111-120.
    [171]宋秀珍、谭中明、周洁.基于EVA的并购方并购绩效实证分析[J].财会通讯2008 (3):57-59.
    [172]孙芳伟,控制权收益与国有企业并购的产权障碍研究[J].改革与战略,2007年第7期
    [173]孙红.国有企业并购动因与政府干预研究[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文,2007年4月.
    [174]孙佳佳、吴铮.影响企业并购行为的大力资源因素探究[J].中国大力资源开发,2009年第2期
    [175]孙喜平.国有企业跨国并购的风险分析与防范对策[J].财会月刊,2010年10月
    [176]童伟.我国国有企业并购中的政府行为研究[J].当代经济,2010年2月
    [177]王丹.产业融合背景下的企业并购研究[D].上海社会科学院硕士学位论文,2008年5月.
    [178]王萍.外资并购我国上市公司绩效的实证分析[J].生产力研究,2010年第4期:115-116.
    [179]王玉荣,张淑艳,胡春霖.外资并购对—我国目标上市公司绩效影响的实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2009年第2期:2258-2267.
    [180]蔚海燕、梁战平,企业并购知识转移影响因素模型实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011年第2期.
    [181]肖振红.基于协同效应的并购目标企业选择研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文,2007年12月.
    [182]谢地、邵波.国有企业跨国并购动因及路径选择——基于政治经济学语境[J].江汉论坛,2010年12月.
    [183]谢纪刚、张金鑫.中央企业并购重组报告[M].中国经济出版社,2010年7月.
    [184]颜晓晖.基于AHP-GRAM模型的跨国并购投资风险评价[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2007年第5期.
    [185]杨洁、程丽霞.我国企业并购的体制环境与策略[J].经济纵横,2006年第9期.
    [186]杨晓嘉,陈收.上市公司并购绩效矩阵评价模型研究[J].财经理论与实践,2005年第2期:64-68.
    [187]杨玉龙.中国钢铁企业并购协同效效益评价——基于武钢与鄂钢重组模式[D].武汉科技大学硕士学位论文,2010年11月.
    [188]杨远霞、胡晓红.我国国有企业并购的体制风险及其防范[J].中国管理信息化,2007年第9期.
    [189]张汇军.中国企业并购的特殊性分析[J].辽宁经济,2006年第7期.
    [190]张晓丽.基于改进的EVA对我国上市公司并购绩效研究[D].山西财经大学硕士论文.2011.
    [191]张新.并购重组是否创造价值?—中国证券市场的理论与实证研究[J].经济研究,2003(6):20-29.
    [192]章新蓉,唐敏.不同动机导向下的公司并购行为及其绩效研究[J].经济问题,2010年第9期:83-87.
    [193]赵息、周军.电力行业上市公司并购绩效实证研究[J].现代管理科学2008(5):32-33.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700